George W. Bush committed hate crimes of epic proportions and with the stench of terrorism (indicated in my blog).

George W. Bush did in fact commit innumerable hate crimes.

And I do solemnly swear by Almighty God that George W. Bush committed other hate crimes of epic proportions and with the stench of terrorism which I am not at liberty to mention.

Many people know what Bush did.

And many people will know what Bush did—even to the end of the world.

Bush was absolute evil.

Bush is now like a fugitive from justice.

Bush is a psychological prisoner.

Bush has a lot to worry about.

Bush can technically be prosecuted for hate crimes at any time.

In any case, Bush will go down in history in infamy.

Submitted by Andrew Yu-Jen Wang
B.S., Summa Cum Laude, 1996
Messiah College, Grantham, PA
Lower Merion High School, Ardmore, PA, 1993

“GEORGE W. BUSH IS THE WORST PRESIDENT IN U.S. HISTORY” BLOG OF ANDREW YU-JEN WANG
______________________
I am not sure where I had read it before, but anyway, it is a linguistically excellent statement, and it goes kind of like this: “If only it were possible to ban invention that bottled up memory so it never got stale and faded.” Oh wait—off the top of my head—I think the quotation came from my Lower Merion High School yearbook.

Dave, please, Illuminati Karate doesn’t even deny it.

Neither did Illuminati Karate admit it, didn’t they? Although George did say “I literally laughed all the way to the bank”, I guess one can take that to mean, in their own convenient belief, that one doesn’t deny being a squatter.

But…you still haven’t said what a squatter is, outside of the generally-accepted dictionary definition and Wikipedia’s entry. Not that everyone’s forced to agree with you or me, anyway, but name-calling without any necessarily factual or authoritative basis isn’t exactly productive.

I’m sure, though, you know how to use your time productively.

http://en.wikip.../Cybersquatting

” registering, trafficking in, or using a domain name with bad faith intent to profit from the goodwill of a trademark belonging to someone else”

What you quoted is pretty much the “definition” of cybersquatting, although obviously no one’s forced to agree with Wikipedia’s entry. But why is Illuminati Karate called a “squatter” here, which is probably what Chris maybe angrily commented about?

Indeed, where is squatting involved? Unless we seek to redefine it to what we want it to be?

they could of got this name back free via UDRP or WIPO

Not really free as it costs around $1300 to $1500 (I think) to file a dispute, much more get a favorable decision.

It is cybersquatting because the phrase “George W Bush” is trademarked

Is it, indeed? Unlike Hillary Clinton who has because she sold books under her name, politicians don’t necessarily have trademark rights to their namesakes.

If George himself made money using his name, then perhaps he might have one. But that means he himself would’ve to argue, not his library foundation who bought the domain name back and not him personally.

So unfortunately, this isn’t necessarily cybersquatting. Not this time, anyway.