<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Times Gets Pwnd</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/30/the-times-gets-pwnd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/30/the-times-gets-pwnd/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:19:37 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: منتديات</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/30/the-times-gets-pwnd/comment-page-2/#comment-2965590</link>
		<dc:creator>منتديات</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 03:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=31087#comment-2965590</guid>
		<description>The real story is how faux news is taking up blog shelf space when the focus should be on Yahoo hijacking, or PWNING, money from customer accounts to shore-up their sorry-ass business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real story is how faux news is taking up blog shelf space when the focus should be on Yahoo hijacking, or PWNING, money from customer accounts to shore-up their sorry-ass business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: مركز تحميل</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/30/the-times-gets-pwnd/comment-page-2/#comment-2965573</link>
		<dc:creator>مركز تحميل</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 03:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=31087#comment-2965573</guid>
		<description>This kind of thing seems to happen more and more as of late. Journalistic standards have fallen to an all time low. Whatever happened to the three source rule?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This kind of thing seems to happen more and more as of late. Journalistic standards have fallen to an all time low. Whatever happened to the three source rule?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft to buy Yahoo Search for $20 billion? &#124; Business 2.0 Press</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/30/the-times-gets-pwnd/comment-page-1/#comment-2757121</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft to buy Yahoo Search for $20 billion? &#124; Business 2.0 Press</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 05:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=31087#comment-2757121</guid>
		<description>[...] The Times article was inaccurate, and sources now say there is no deal in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Times article was inaccurate, and sources now say there is no deal in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ArticleSave :: Uncategorized :: Revealed: The Times Made Up That Stuff About Google And The Tea Kettles</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/30/the-times-gets-pwnd/comment-page-1/#comment-2595605</link>
		<dc:creator>ArticleSave :: Uncategorized :: Revealed: The Times Made Up That Stuff About Google And The Tea Kettles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 07:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=31087#comment-2595605</guid>
		<description>[...] recent memory that The Times has been mistaken about a tech story - in late November the newspaper incorrectly reported on a complicated and fictional Yahoo/Microsoft search [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recent memory that The Times has been mistaken about a tech story &#8211; in late November the newspaper incorrectly reported on a complicated and fictional Yahoo/Microsoft search [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google JEST ekologiczne &#124; Human after all</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/30/the-times-gets-pwnd/comment-page-1/#comment-2592801</link>
		<dc:creator>Google JEST ekologiczne &#124; Human after all</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=31087#comment-2592801</guid>
		<description>[...] Yahoo za 20 miliardów dolarów, co nijak się miało do pierwotnej oferty Microsoftu i czemu zaprzeczały wszystkie źródła w jednej i drugiej [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Yahoo za 20 miliardów dolarów, co nijak się miało do pierwotnej oferty Microsoftu i czemu zaprzeczały wszystkie źródła w jednej i drugiej [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Revealed: The Times Made Up That Stuff About Google And CO2 emission &#124; Simple Solutions</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/30/the-times-gets-pwnd/comment-page-1/#comment-2592183</link>
		<dc:creator>Revealed: The Times Made Up That Stuff About Google And CO2 emission &#124; Simple Solutions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=31087#comment-2592183</guid>
		<description>[...] recent memory that The Times has been mistaken about a tech story - in late November the newspaper incorrectly reported on a complicated and fictional Yahoo/Microsoft search arrangement. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recent memory that The Times has been mistaken about a tech story &#8211; in late November the newspaper incorrectly reported on a complicated and fictional Yahoo/Microsoft search arrangement. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Revealed: The Times Made Up That Stuff About Google And The Tea Kettles</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/30/the-times-gets-pwnd/comment-page-1/#comment-2591955</link>
		<dc:creator>Revealed: The Times Made Up That Stuff About Google And The Tea Kettles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 02:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=31087#comment-2591955</guid>
		<description>[...] recent memory that The Times has been mistaken about a tech story - in late November the newspaper incorrectly reported on a complicated Yahoo/Microsoft search arrangement.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recent memory that The Times has been mistaken about a tech story &#8211; in late November the newspaper incorrectly reported on a complicated Yahoo/Microsoft search arrangement.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It&#8217;s Official: New Media Journalism is Legit &#171; Monday Morning Blogger</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/30/the-times-gets-pwnd/comment-page-1/#comment-2560466</link>
		<dc:creator>It&#8217;s Official: New Media Journalism is Legit &#171; Monday Morning Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 17:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=31087#comment-2560466</guid>
		<description>[...] The issue with the Times&#8217; false story is more of the same.  The Times, a well established news media source, published a story that was patently false (and over a week later the article is still up on their site).  However, tech blogs like Techcrunch reported on this false story within minutes - first questioning the validity of the story and hours later discounting it entirely. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The issue with the Times&#8217; false story is more of the same.  The Times, a well established news media source, published a story that was patently false (and over a week later the article is still up on their site).  However, tech blogs like Techcrunch reported on this false story within minutes &#8211; first questioning the validity of the story and hours later discounting it entirely. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The PHA : links for 2008-12-03</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/30/the-times-gets-pwnd/comment-page-1/#comment-2555581</link>
		<dc:creator>The PHA : links for 2008-12-03</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=31087#comment-2555581</guid>
		<description>[...] The Times Gets Pwnd (tags: yahoo technology times techcrunch sad media google crisis) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Times Gets Pwnd (tags: yahoo technology times techcrunch sad media google crisis) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Minneapolis Web Design Desaraev</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/30/the-times-gets-pwnd/comment-page-1/#comment-2554771</link>
		<dc:creator>Minneapolis Web Design Desaraev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 17:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=31087#comment-2554771</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe the crap people try. Fail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe the crap people try. Fail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Journalistic Debacle, Get A Clue!</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/30/the-times-gets-pwnd/comment-page-1/#comment-2554045</link>
		<dc:creator>Journalistic Debacle, Get A Clue!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 03:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=31087#comment-2554045</guid>
		<description>[...] You can read the entire TechCrunch article HERE. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You can read the entire TechCrunch article HERE. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Another Bogus Yahoo Takeover Story - The WSJ Gets It Wrong, And This Time People Lost Money</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/30/the-times-gets-pwnd/comment-page-1/#comment-2553955</link>
		<dc:creator>Another Bogus Yahoo Takeover Story - The WSJ Gets It Wrong, And This Time People Lost Money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 01:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=31087#comment-2553955</guid>
		<description>[...] Yahoo is incorrect, say out own sources. And unlike The Times&#8217; story over the weekend, which was equally fictitious, this story had direct consequences in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Yahoo is incorrect, say out own sources. And unlike The Times&#8217; story over the weekend, which was equally fictitious, this story had direct consequences in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acai berry diet</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/30/the-times-gets-pwnd/comment-page-1/#comment-2553322</link>
		<dc:creator>acai berry diet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 14:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=31087#comment-2553322</guid>
		<description>mega fail eh lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mega fail eh lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: erwin castro</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/30/the-times-gets-pwnd/comment-page-1/#comment-2553064</link>
		<dc:creator>erwin castro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 09:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=31087#comment-2553064</guid>
		<description>Go for it Microsoft!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go for it Microsoft!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: erwin castro</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/30/the-times-gets-pwnd/comment-page-1/#comment-2553059</link>
		<dc:creator>erwin castro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 09:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=31087#comment-2553059</guid>
		<description>Microsoft really in desperate needs of Yahoo audiences, Microsoft without a doubt need Yahoo, Microsoft web presence is not enough to compete Google, Yahoo online reach plus massive users base could make sense, The combination of two companies could almost create leverage against Google, the two companies got not so bad search engine, allright online advertising system and nice brand name, Yahoo need Microsoft&#039;s massive infrastructure to power most of Yahoo search, Yahoo don&#039;t have enough cash to acquire those expensive data centers that badly needed for Yaho search business. For more about Microsoft Adventure you can check my site, and  for more about the latest on Yahoo and Google just drop to my site at http://netcrawl.blogspot.com        
I&#039;ll been following the Yahoo-Microsoft stories for months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft really in desperate needs of Yahoo audiences, Microsoft without a doubt need Yahoo, Microsoft web presence is not enough to compete Google, Yahoo online reach plus massive users base could make sense, The combination of two companies could almost create leverage against Google, the two companies got not so bad search engine, allright online advertising system and nice brand name, Yahoo need Microsoft&#8217;s massive infrastructure to power most of Yahoo search, Yahoo don&#8217;t have enough cash to acquire those expensive data centers that badly needed for Yaho search business. For more about Microsoft Adventure you can check my site, and  for more about the latest on Yahoo and Google just drop to my site at <a href="http://netcrawl.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://netcrawl.blogspot.com'>http://netcrawl.blogspot.com</a><br />
I&#8217;ll been following the Yahoo-Microsoft stories for months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truth, classical media and &#8220;new media&#8221; &#171; pensées aléatoires</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/30/the-times-gets-pwnd/comment-page-1/#comment-2553006</link>
		<dc:creator>truth, classical media and &#8220;new media&#8221; &#171; pensées aléatoires</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 08:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=31087#comment-2553006</guid>
		<description>[...] There is a classical stance by the newspaper, that try to say that only their information can be trusted, everybody else failing to have that &#8220;journalist ethic&#8221; badly needed to give acurate information. This seems to fail more and more, or maybe, it is just pointed out more and more, and in a clearer way. Another example being a Times online article[en] published recently that was completely wrong. As far as i know it was debunked by Michael Arrington on Techcrunch[en]. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There is a classical stance by the newspaper, that try to say that only their information can be trusted, everybody else failing to have that &#8220;journalist ethic&#8221; badly needed to give acurate information. This seems to fail more and more, or maybe, it is just pointed out more and more, and in a clearer way. Another example being a Times online article[en] published recently that was completely wrong. As far as i know it was debunked by Michael Arrington on Techcrunch[en]. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: njfnfjffdg</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/30/the-times-gets-pwnd/comment-page-1/#comment-2552986</link>
		<dc:creator>njfnfjffdg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 08:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=31087#comment-2552986</guid>
		<description>...You focking grownups are so focking boring</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;You focking grownups are so focking boring</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: web</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/30/the-times-gets-pwnd/comment-page-1/#comment-2552337</link>
		<dc:creator>web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=31087#comment-2552337</guid>
		<description>Maybe this rumor was started by Jerry Yang in an effort to make his stock worth something now that retirement looms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe this rumor was started by Jerry Yang in an effort to make his stock worth something now that retirement looms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tinyComb &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Damn You Citizen Journalists</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/30/the-times-gets-pwnd/comment-page-1/#comment-2552336</link>
		<dc:creator>tinyComb &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Damn You Citizen Journalists</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=31087#comment-2552336</guid>
		<description>[...] going to be the standard of responsibility to prevent fake stories from circulating in the news? It seems like a new fake story comes out just about every few days now, and they are hitting headlines. So, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] going to be the standard of responsibility to prevent fake stories from circulating in the news? It seems like a new fake story comes out just about every few days now, and they are hitting headlines. So, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erick</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/30/the-times-gets-pwnd/comment-page-1/#comment-2552190</link>
		<dc:creator>Erick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 18:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=31087#comment-2552190</guid>
		<description>If its from the Times; don&#039;t trust and verify.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If its from the Times; don&#8217;t trust and verify.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Arrington</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/30/the-times-gets-pwnd/comment-page-1/#comment-2552150</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Arrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=31087#comment-2552150</guid>
		<description>same website, same owner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>same website, same owner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: egghat</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/30/the-times-gets-pwnd/comment-page-1/#comment-2552016</link>
		<dc:creator>egghat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 14:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=31087#comment-2552016</guid>
		<description>Well no spike in the stock price?

http://de.finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=YHO.F&amp;t=5d

up more than 20% in early trading in Frankfurt. 130,000 shares aren&#039;t that much, but definitely more than &quot;no harm done&quot; ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well no spike in the stock price?</p>
<p><a href="http://de.finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=YHO.F&amp;t=5d" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://de.finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=YHO.F&amp;t=5d'>http://de.finan...=YHO.F&amp;t=5d</a></p>
<p>up more than 20% in early trading in Frankfurt. 130,000 shares aren&#8217;t that much, but definitely more than &#8220;no harm done&#8221; &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/30/the-times-gets-pwnd/comment-page-1/#comment-2552014</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 14:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=31087#comment-2552014</guid>
		<description>Nah techrunch is always right!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nah techrunch is always right!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claude</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/30/the-times-gets-pwnd/comment-page-1/#comment-2551923</link>
		<dc:creator>Claude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 12:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=31087#comment-2551923</guid>
		<description>The real story is how faux news is taking up blog shelf space when the focus should be on Yahoo hijacking, or PWNING, money from customer accounts to shore-up their sorry-ass business.

They hit my card for $34.95 on Nov. 24th. claiming to be &quot;auto-renewing&quot; a product I bought back in 2005 (for $2.99). When I search the web I see I&#039;m not alone. Folks are talking class-action.

I would&#039;nt be surprised if Yahoo flung this crap &quot;news&quot; themselves just to see how much would stick and who would be stuck-on-it. What a stink&#039;n diversion. 

Yahoo aint getting $20 billion! They&#039;re stealing from 20 million!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real story is how faux news is taking up blog shelf space when the focus should be on Yahoo hijacking, or PWNING, money from customer accounts to shore-up their sorry-ass business.</p>
<p>They hit my card for $34.95 on Nov. 24th. claiming to be &#8220;auto-renewing&#8221; a product I bought back in 2005 (for $2.99). When I search the web I see I&#8217;m not alone. Folks are talking class-action.</p>
<p>I would&#8217;nt be surprised if Yahoo flung this crap &#8220;news&#8221; themselves just to see how much would stick and who would be stuck-on-it. What a stink&#8217;n diversion. </p>
<p>Yahoo aint getting $20 billion! They&#8217;re stealing from 20 million!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/30/the-times-gets-pwnd/comment-page-1/#comment-2551905</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 12:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=31087#comment-2551905</guid>
		<description>Even though you got the wrong paper, thanks for calling The Times &quot;The Times&quot; and not &quot;The Times of London&quot;, which every other American seems to think it&#039;s called.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though you got the wrong paper, thanks for calling The Times &#8220;The Times&#8221; and not &#8220;The Times of London&#8221;, which every other American seems to think it&#8217;s called.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
