<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google SearchWiki Vanishes (Updated)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-vanishes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-vanishes/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 20:06:55 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Google cu SearchWiki &#8211; bine sau rau? &#124; Daniel Buca</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-vanishes/comment-page-2/#comment-3003176</link>
		<dc:creator>Google cu SearchWiki &#8211; bine sau rau? &#124; Daniel Buca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 20:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29892#comment-3003176</guid>
		<description>[...] Functionalitatile specifice SearchWiki apar numai cand esti logat in contul google si au fost activate gradual in decursul saptamanii trecute pentru aproape toate conturile. A fost si un moment in care aceste functionalitati au disparut dar si-au revenit dupa cateva ore (vezi detalii aici). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Functionalitatile specifice SearchWiki apar numai cand esti logat in contul google si au fost activate gradual in decursul saptamanii trecute pentru aproape toate conturile. A fost si un moment in care aceste functionalitati au disparut dar si-au revenit dupa cateva ore (vezi detalii aici). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronvi Tang</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-vanishes/comment-page-2/#comment-2640839</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronvi Tang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 10:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29892#comment-2640839</guid>
		<description>I think it will have a fair share of success. Here&#039;s an article with more recent overview.

http://www.w3whiz.com/google-searchwiki/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it will have a fair share of success. Here&#8217;s an article with more recent overview.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.w3whiz.com/google-searchwiki/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.w3whiz.com/google-searchwiki/'>http://www.w3wh...gle-searchwiki/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google&#8217;s SearchWiki Disappears, Reappears : McTechie : I&#8217;m lovin&#8217;it!</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-vanishes/comment-page-2/#comment-2612546</link>
		<dc:creator>Google&#8217;s SearchWiki Disappears, Reappears : McTechie : I&#8217;m lovin&#8217;it!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 18:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29892#comment-2612546</guid>
		<description>[...] Well, drat, it appears this is a bug rather than a revamp. “We’re really sorry that people can’t use SearchWiki at the moment - [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Well, drat, it appears this is a bug rather than a revamp. “We’re really sorry that people can’t use SearchWiki at the moment &#8211; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kandomble 2.0 &#187; Comentarios sobre SearchWiki</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-vanishes/comment-page-2/#comment-2572263</link>
		<dc:creator>Kandomble 2.0 &#187; Comentarios sobre SearchWiki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 08:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29892#comment-2572263</guid>
		<description>[...] arturogoga,&#160; despuesdegoogle, readwriteweb, techcrunch, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] arturogoga,&#160; despuesdegoogle, readwriteweb, techcrunch, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-vanishes/comment-page-2/#comment-2547232</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29892#comment-2547232</guid>
		<description>This is not a good implementation. As one reader points out, people can get confused between personalized search and start entering all their private information into the comments fields such as date of birth, social security numbers, and passwords.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not a good implementation. As one reader points out, people can get confused between personalized search and start entering all their private information into the comments fields such as date of birth, social security numbers, and passwords.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Search Wiki becomes one of Google’s Experiments &#124; Web Analytics Blog &#124; Web analytics</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-vanishes/comment-page-2/#comment-2546804</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Search Wiki becomes one of Google’s Experiments &#124; Web Analytics Blog &#124; Web analytics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29892#comment-2546804</guid>
		<description>[...] Arrington, I noticed Google SearchWiki Vanishes but I was able to get it back via Google Experiment - it&#8217;s one of the 4 experiments you can [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Arrington, I noticed Google SearchWiki Vanishes but I was able to get it back via Google Experiment &#8211; it&#8217;s one of the 4 experiments you can [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google cu SearchWiki - bine sau rau? &#124; Daniel Buca</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-vanishes/comment-page-2/#comment-2546683</link>
		<dc:creator>Google cu SearchWiki - bine sau rau? &#124; Daniel Buca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 23:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29892#comment-2546683</guid>
		<description>[...] Functionalitatile specifice SearchWiki apar numai cand esti logat in contul google si au fost activate gradual in decursul saptamanii trecute pentru aproape toate conturile. A fost si un moment in care aceste functionalitati au disparut dar si-au revenit dupa cateva ore (vezi detalii aici). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Functionalitatile specifice SearchWiki apar numai cand esti logat in contul google si au fost activate gradual in decursul saptamanii trecute pentru aproape toate conturile. A fost si un moment in care aceste functionalitati au disparut dar si-au revenit dupa cateva ore (vezi detalii aici). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gman</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-vanishes/comment-page-2/#comment-2546030</link>
		<dc:creator>gman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 09:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29892#comment-2546030</guid>
		<description>Search wiki features still shows under my account.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Search wiki features still shows under my account.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google makes bad usability to get user data? &#171; Software Development at Statsbiblioteket</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-vanishes/comment-page-2/#comment-2546005</link>
		<dc:creator>Google makes bad usability to get user data? &#171; Software Development at Statsbiblioteket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 08:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29892#comment-2546005</guid>
		<description>[...] A critical view. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A critical view. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matty</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-vanishes/comment-page-1/#comment-2545951</link>
		<dc:creator>Matty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 07:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29892#comment-2545951</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s ok, my mother has added her bank logins and various site passwords in to the comment sections for the site URL&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s ok, my mother has added her bank logins and various site passwords in to the comment sections for the site URL&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google&#8217;s SearchWiki Disappears, Reappears &#124; Student Tech News</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-vanishes/comment-page-2/#comment-2545843</link>
		<dc:creator>Google&#8217;s SearchWiki Disappears, Reappears &#124; Student Tech News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 04:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29892#comment-2545843</guid>
		<description>[...] Well, drat, it appears this is a bug rather than a revamp. “We’re really sorry that people can’t use SearchWiki at the moment - [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Well, drat, it appears this is a bug rather than a revamp. “We’re really sorry that people can’t use SearchWiki at the moment &#8211; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coolnalu</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-vanishes/comment-page-1/#comment-2545346</link>
		<dc:creator>coolnalu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29892#comment-2545346</guid>
		<description>prolly not. you certainly can&#039;t trust internet users to rank sites unbiasedly. the value is to provide customized result to provide better relevancy different people based on individual preferences.

yet the comment feature is awful. my dark side is urging me to assault websites i hate with malicious spam comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>prolly not. you certainly can&#8217;t trust internet users to rank sites unbiasedly. the value is to provide customized result to provide better relevancy different people based on individual preferences.</p>
<p>yet the comment feature is awful. my dark side is urging me to assault websites i hate with malicious spam comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mixed reception for Google SearchWiki &#171; Clicking and Screaming</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-vanishes/comment-page-2/#comment-2545055</link>
		<dc:creator>Mixed reception for Google SearchWiki &#171; Clicking and Screaming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 12:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29892#comment-2545055</guid>
		<description>[...] as useful rather than life-changing. I find it entirely unobtrusive (a criticism levelled at it by TechCrunch, which has sourced a guide for removing it - as has Google) and I think there may be occasions when [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as useful rather than life-changing. I find it entirely unobtrusive (a criticism levelled at it by TechCrunch, which has sourced a guide for removing it &#8211; as has Google) and I think there may be occasions when [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Bruce Clay on &#8220;Ranking is Dead&#8221; at Pubcon 2008 &#124; Web Pro News Interview &#171; Nashville Search Engine Optimization, Ethical SEO, and Social Media Marketing Company</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-vanishes/comment-page-2/#comment-2545039</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Bruce Clay on &#8220;Ranking is Dead&#8221; at Pubcon 2008 &#124; Web Pro News Interview &#171; Nashville Search Engine Optimization, Ethical SEO, and Social Media Marketing Company</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 12:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29892#comment-2545039</guid>
		<description>[...] irrespective of the micro-action Google takes on its most recent foray into results personalization with search-wiki, two search ranking trends seem very evident: 1) personalization of search (Google likely sees this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] irrespective of the micro-action Google takes on its most recent foray into results personalization with search-wiki, two search ranking trends seem very evident: 1) personalization of search (Google likely sees this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-vanishes/comment-page-2/#comment-2544841</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 08:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29892#comment-2544841</guid>
		<description>I like it. If you use Google like a directory for contact details etc.. then it&#039;s appreciated to be able to bring my preferred results to the top.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like it. If you use Google like a directory for contact details etc.. then it&#8217;s appreciated to be able to bring my preferred results to the top.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Redmond Ruby</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-vanishes/comment-page-1/#comment-2544605</link>
		<dc:creator>Redmond Ruby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 02:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29892#comment-2544605</guid>
		<description>Gee, that&#039;s a visual that I didn&#039;t need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee, that&#8217;s a visual that I didn&#8217;t need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google SearchWiki: Good, poor, Gone? &#124; PcBlue.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-vanishes/comment-page-2/#comment-2544557</link>
		<dc:creator>Google SearchWiki: Good, poor, Gone? &#124; PcBlue.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 01:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29892#comment-2544557</guid>
		<description>[...] I agree with many of Brennon&#8217;s points. Others say Google is contradicting its aesthetic and simplistic ideals. Some just rant about the recent bugs with it, due to which Google has completely removed the SearchWiki features for the moment. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I agree with many of Brennon&#8217;s points. Others say Google is contradicting its aesthetic and simplistic ideals. Some just rant about the recent bugs with it, due to which Google has completely removed the SearchWiki features for the moment. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rev</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-vanishes/comment-page-1/#comment-2544553</link>
		<dc:creator>Rev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 01:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29892#comment-2544553</guid>
		<description>My bad.   But, I think you get the point anyway.  The fact that the input that other people give through SearchWiki affects the search results of other users is simply messed up.  Then if it is not affecting the algorithm, what is it changing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My bad.   But, I think you get the point anyway.  The fact that the input that other people give through SearchWiki affects the search results of other users is simply messed up.  Then if it is not affecting the algorithm, what is it changing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google SearchWiki: Good, poor, Gone? &#124; Must Have Gadgets</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-vanishes/comment-page-2/#comment-2544541</link>
		<dc:creator>Google SearchWiki: Good, poor, Gone? &#124; Must Have Gadgets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 00:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29892#comment-2544541</guid>
		<description>[...] I agree with many of Brennon&#8217;s points. Others say Google is contradicting its aesthetic and simplistic ideals. Some just rant about the recent bugs with it, due to which Google has completely removed the SearchWiki features for the moment. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I agree with many of Brennon&#8217;s points. Others say Google is contradicting its aesthetic and simplistic ideals. Some just rant about the recent bugs with it, due to which Google has completely removed the SearchWiki features for the moment. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google SearchWiki: Good, poor, Gone? &#124; Gizmos and Gadgets</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-vanishes/comment-page-2/#comment-2544528</link>
		<dc:creator>Google SearchWiki: Good, poor, Gone? &#124; Gizmos and Gadgets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 00:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29892#comment-2544528</guid>
		<description>[...] I agree with many of Brennon&#8217;s points. Others say Google is contradicting its aesthetic and simplistic ideals. Some just rant about the recent bugs with it, due to which Google has completely removed the SearchWiki features for the moment. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I agree with many of Brennon&#8217;s points. Others say Google is contradicting its aesthetic and simplistic ideals. Some just rant about the recent bugs with it, due to which Google has completely removed the SearchWiki features for the moment. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google SearchWiki: Good, poor, Gone? &#124; Technology News</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-vanishes/comment-page-2/#comment-2544518</link>
		<dc:creator>Google SearchWiki: Good, poor, Gone? &#124; Technology News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 23:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29892#comment-2544518</guid>
		<description>[...] I agree with many of Brennon&#8217;s points. Others say Google is contradicting its aesthetic and simplistic ideals. Some just rant about the recent bugs with it, due to which Google has completely removed the SearchWiki features for the moment. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I agree with many of Brennon&#8217;s points. Others say Google is contradicting its aesthetic and simplistic ideals. Some just rant about the recent bugs with it, due to which Google has completely removed the SearchWiki features for the moment. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ahjsgh</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-vanishes/comment-page-2/#comment-2544517</link>
		<dc:creator>ahjsgh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 23:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29892#comment-2544517</guid>
		<description>searchmydick.com is still available</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>searchmydick.com is still available</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google SearchWiki: Good, poor, Gone? &#124; Gadget News</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-vanishes/comment-page-2/#comment-2544516</link>
		<dc:creator>Google SearchWiki: Good, poor, Gone? &#124; Gadget News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 23:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29892#comment-2544516</guid>
		<description>[...] I agree with many of Brennon&#8217;s points. Others say Google is contradicting its aesthetic and simplistic ideals. Some just rant about the recent bugs with it, due to which Google has completely removed the SearchWiki features for the moment. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I agree with many of Brennon&#8217;s points. Others say Google is contradicting its aesthetic and simplistic ideals. Some just rant about the recent bugs with it, due to which Google has completely removed the SearchWiki features for the moment. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-vanishes/comment-page-2/#comment-2544463</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 21:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29892#comment-2544463</guid>
		<description>Stupid idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stupid idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google SearchWiki - Getting Close to Personalized - Pogung177 - Not Addict Anymore</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-vanishes/comment-page-2/#comment-2544413</link>
		<dc:creator>Google SearchWiki - Getting Close to Personalized - Pogung177 - Not Addict Anymore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 19:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29892#comment-2544413</guid>
		<description>[...] Google SearchWiki Vanishes (Updated) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google SearchWiki Vanishes (Updated) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
