<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google SearchWiki Is Back. Here&#8217;s How To Kill It For Good.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-is-back-heres-how-to-kill-it-for-good/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-is-back-heres-how-to-kill-it-for-good/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 02:38:04 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Google SearchWiki &#8211; User Reactions and Search Marketing Implications &#124; Sitewire Evolutionary Marketing Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-is-back-heres-how-to-kill-it-for-good/comment-page-2/#comment-3078549</link>
		<dc:creator>Google SearchWiki &#8211; User Reactions and Search Marketing Implications &#124; Sitewire Evolutionary Marketing Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29927#comment-3078549</guid>
		<description>[...] Spammers are already spamming the &#8220;comments&#8221; of search results &#8211; as seen here.  Comments too can be flagged as inappropriate, so it is up to your loyal social following to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Spammers are already spamming the &#8220;comments&#8221; of search results &#8211; as seen here.  Comments too can be flagged as inappropriate, so it is up to your loyal social following to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: islamisohbet</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-is-back-heres-how-to-kill-it-for-good/comment-page-2/#comment-2784732</link>
		<dc:creator>islamisohbet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 12:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29927#comment-2784732</guid>
		<description>This would really be a great feature if people could be trusted to rank things honestly. Unfortunately, Google has to spend 99% of their resources to combat spammers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This would really be a great feature if people could be trusted to rank things honestly. Unfortunately, Google has to spend 99% of their resources to combat spammers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: This Life of Brian &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why the Alarm About Google&#8217;s SearchWiki?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-is-back-heres-how-to-kill-it-for-good/comment-page-2/#comment-2559907</link>
		<dc:creator>This Life of Brian &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why the Alarm About Google&#8217;s SearchWiki?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 02:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29927#comment-2559907</guid>
		<description>[...] live for all users with a Google Account, and there&#8217;s been a lot of complaining since. Mike at Tech Crunch complained that it was a new outlet for porn spam and ripe for abuse. Will at Tech Savvy Educator [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] live for all users with a Google Account, and there&#8217;s been a lot of complaining since. Mike at Tech Crunch complained that it was a new outlet for porn spam and ripe for abuse. Will at Tech Savvy Educator [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google News 17 Nov 2008 - 24 Nov 2008 &#124; WeGoSe Media</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-is-back-heres-how-to-kill-it-for-good/comment-page-2/#comment-2555588</link>
		<dc:creator>Google News 17 Nov 2008 - 24 Nov 2008 &#124; WeGoSe Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29927#comment-2555588</guid>
		<description>[...] Google SearchWiki Is Back. Here&#8217;s How To Kill It For Good. Cheers were heard across the Internet earlier today when Google&#8217;s new SearchWiki search interface inexplicably vanished. Perhaps, just maybe, it was gone for good. Or at least when it returned it would have an opt out feature. &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google SearchWiki Is Back. Here&#8217;s How To Kill It For Good. Cheers were heard across the Internet earlier today when Google&#8217;s new SearchWiki search interface inexplicably vanished. Perhaps, just maybe, it was gone for good. Or at least when it returned it would have an opt out feature. &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blogonawire &#124; Google SearchWiki - User Reactions and Search Marketing Implications</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-is-back-heres-how-to-kill-it-for-good/comment-page-2/#comment-2552071</link>
		<dc:creator>blogonawire &#124; Google SearchWiki - User Reactions and Search Marketing Implications</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 16:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29927#comment-2552071</guid>
		<description>[...] SearchWiki.  Spammers are already spamming the &#8220;comments&#8221; of search results - as seen here.  Comments too can be flagged as inappropriate, so it is up to your loyal social following to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SearchWiki.  Spammers are already spamming the &#8220;comments&#8221; of search results &#8211; as seen here.  Comments too can be flagged as inappropriate, so it is up to your loyal social following to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikolay Kolev</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-is-back-heres-how-to-kill-it-for-good/comment-page-1/#comment-2549447</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikolay Kolev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 22:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29927#comment-2549447</guid>
		<description>@Steve Bomber: Google re-invented the browser architecture? Yeah, in their marketing materials they surely did! If you use Chrome daily (like I do), you&#039;ll know it&#039;s all just marketing as it&#039;s neither more stable, nor more secure than IE7; not even than IE8.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Steve Bomber: Google re-invented the browser architecture? Yeah, in their marketing materials they surely did! If you use Chrome daily (like I do), you&#8217;ll know it&#8217;s all just marketing as it&#8217;s neither more stable, nor more secure than IE7; not even than IE8.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Powering search with UGC: Google should look at Yandex &#124; Window on the Media</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-is-back-heres-how-to-kill-it-for-good/comment-page-2/#comment-2548273</link>
		<dc:creator>Powering search with UGC: Google should look at Yandex &#124; Window on the Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 17:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29927#comment-2548273</guid>
		<description>[...] of user input I was talking about last week. The new SearchWikis are an invitation to spammers, as Michael Arrington in the US and Didier Durand in France have pointed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of user input I was talking about last week. The new SearchWikis are an invitation to spammers, as Michael Arrington in the US and Didier Durand in France have pointed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boardgirl</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-is-back-heres-how-to-kill-it-for-good/comment-page-2/#comment-2547923</link>
		<dc:creator>boardgirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 09:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29927#comment-2547923</guid>
		<description>This new feature from google called searchwiki is sure causing a stir among techies and regular surfers. Some people hate it some people love it. It is basicly a digg style vote/comment system for google search results. Check out what it looks like (if its not working in your region yet) at http://thesearchwiki.com to see some screen shots and video about how it works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This new feature from google called searchwiki is sure causing a stir among techies and regular surfers. Some people hate it some people love it. It is basicly a digg style vote/comment system for google search results. Check out what it looks like (if its not working in your region yet) at <a href="http://thesearchwiki.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://thesearchwiki.com'>http://thesearchwiki.com</a> to see some screen shots and video about how it works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Primeras reacciones sobre Google SearchWiki - Un Blog M&#225;s</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-is-back-heres-how-to-kill-it-for-good/comment-page-2/#comment-2546570</link>
		<dc:creator>Primeras reacciones sobre Google SearchWiki - Un Blog M&#225;s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 21:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29927#comment-2546570</guid>
		<description>[...] así como la imposibilidad de deshacer los cambios realizados previamente. Por otro lado, en Techcrunch afirman la facilidad con la que se puede generar spam gracias a SearchWiki y &#8220;ensuciar&#8221; los [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] así como la imposibilidad de deshacer los cambios realizados previamente. Por otro lado, en Techcrunch afirman la facilidad con la que se puede generar spam gracias a SearchWiki y &#8220;ensuciar&#8221; los [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micky D</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-is-back-heres-how-to-kill-it-for-good/comment-page-1/#comment-2546494</link>
		<dc:creator>Micky D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 20:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29927#comment-2546494</guid>
		<description>Agreed, dumbest thing i have seen from Google in a while.

Another reason to avoid Google accounts and logging in to them, the members of my non-tech savvy forum are logging out of their Google accounts and abandoning them in droves and switching to Yahoo/Hotmail addys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, dumbest thing i have seen from Google in a while.</p>
<p>Another reason to avoid Google accounts and logging in to them, the members of my non-tech savvy forum are logging out of their Google accounts and abandoning them in droves and switching to Yahoo/Hotmail addys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Spam, confusion, and annoyance - welcome to SearchWiki &#124; Pagespank.com - web 0.0</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-is-back-heres-how-to-kill-it-for-good/comment-page-2/#comment-2546200</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Spam, confusion, and annoyance - welcome to SearchWiki &#124; Pagespank.com - web 0.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 14:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29927#comment-2546200</guid>
		<description>[...] TechCrunch&#8217;s porn spam, I have a few favourite comments, including the anonymous searcher who has commented on most Google [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TechCrunch&#8217;s porn spam, I have a few favourite comments, including the anonymous searcher who has commented on most Google [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tryps</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-is-back-heres-how-to-kill-it-for-good/comment-page-2/#comment-2545518</link>
		<dc:creator>Tryps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 20:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29927#comment-2545518</guid>
		<description>So.. how am I supposed to use this feature?
1) Google something
2) Click on a link
3) Like or hate what I see
4) Click back to the search results
5) Make a comment

Yay, of course google! I&#039;d love to do that for you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So.. how am I supposed to use this feature?<br />
1) Google something<br />
2) Click on a link<br />
3) Like or hate what I see<br />
4) Click back to the search results<br />
5) Make a comment</p>
<p>Yay, of course google! I&#8217;d love to do that for you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Engago Team</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-is-back-heres-how-to-kill-it-for-good/comment-page-2/#comment-2545221</link>
		<dc:creator>Engago Team</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29927#comment-2545221</guid>
		<description>Maybe in the near future we can tell the end of the once mighty Google:
- Started the hated Wiki Search
- Killed themselves by killing Adsense thanks to their Wiki Search
- Microsoft and Amazon controlled the cloud market and Google never could make people pay for their Google Apps.
- Tried to sell mobile phones into retail stores - which killed Google completely as Samsung controlled the pricing of the required processors and chips.

Now we all miss Google Earth</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe in the near future we can tell the end of the once mighty Google:<br />
- Started the hated Wiki Search<br />
- Killed themselves by killing Adsense thanks to their Wiki Search<br />
- Microsoft and Amazon controlled the cloud market and Google never could make people pay for their Google Apps.<br />
- Tried to sell mobile phones into retail stores &#8211; which killed Google completely as Samsung controlled the pricing of the required processors and chips.</p>
<p>Now we all miss Google Earth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Get Rid of Google's Search Wiki for Good &#124; Next Modo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-is-back-heres-how-to-kill-it-for-good/comment-page-2/#comment-2545200</link>
		<dc:creator>Get Rid of Google's Search Wiki for Good &#124; Next Modo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29927#comment-2545200</guid>
		<description>[...] Google SearchWiki is back again.  I&#8217;m tired of talking about this crappy tool.  Arrington, over at TechCrunch has a post on how to get rid of SearchWiki for good. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google SearchWiki is back again.  I&#8217;m tired of talking about this crappy tool.  Arrington, over at TechCrunch has a post on how to get rid of SearchWiki for good. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google SearchWiki &#124; Technico Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-is-back-heres-how-to-kill-it-for-good/comment-page-2/#comment-2545151</link>
		<dc:creator>Google SearchWiki &#124; Technico Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 14:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29927#comment-2545151</guid>
		<description>[...] ogni medaglia ha il suo rovescio, infatti, come ha riferito TechCrunch negli ultimi giorni, spesso i commenti vengono utilizzati per spammare siti più o meno dignitosi, e di solito [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ogni medaglia ha il suo rovescio, infatti, come ha riferito TechCrunch negli ultimi giorni, spesso i commenti vengono utilizzati per spammare siti più o meno dignitosi, e di solito [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-is-back-heres-how-to-kill-it-for-good/comment-page-2/#comment-2545144</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 14:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29927#comment-2545144</guid>
		<description>Doesn&#039;t surprise me - Google seems to have forgotten about their users. They rolled out the new iGoogle beta to &quot;a percentage of users&quot; with NO option to back out, and pissed off a lot of users there. They &quot;streamlined&quot; their real-estate search, basically by removing all filtering capabilities, and gave no response to users who complained.

This is just more of the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t surprise me &#8211; Google seems to have forgotten about their users. They rolled out the new iGoogle beta to &#8220;a percentage of users&#8221; with NO option to back out, and pissed off a lot of users there. They &#8220;streamlined&#8221; their real-estate search, basically by removing all filtering capabilities, and gave no response to users who complained.</p>
<p>This is just more of the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: exapted</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-is-back-heres-how-to-kill-it-for-good/comment-page-2/#comment-2545013</link>
		<dc:creator>exapted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 11:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29927#comment-2545013</guid>
		<description>My Google account is registered as a US account, and I use US English as my interface language.

But I am not located in the US. So I&#039;m assuming that&#039;s why SearchWiki doesn&#039;t show up for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My Google account is registered as a US account, and I use US English as my interface language.</p>
<p>But I am not located in the US. So I&#8217;m assuming that&#8217;s why SearchWiki doesn&#8217;t show up for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why googles did search machine place in? &#124; Truckers' Kit</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-is-back-heres-how-to-kill-it-for-good/comment-page-2/#comment-2544978</link>
		<dc:creator>Why googles did search machine place in? &#124; Truckers' Kit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 11:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29927#comment-2544978</guid>
		<description>[...] the new voting and commenting feature for search results Google introduced last week, or not, it was undeniably a bold move for the company to turn on the feature for everyone with a Google [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the new voting and commenting feature for search results Google introduced last week, or not, it was undeniably a bold move for the company to turn on the feature for everyone with a Google [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Bomber</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-is-back-heres-how-to-kill-it-for-good/comment-page-1/#comment-2544768</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Bomber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 06:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29927#comment-2544768</guid>
		<description>Yeah, except they pretty much re-invented the entire web browser architecture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, except they pretty much re-invented the entire web browser architecture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Bomber</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-is-back-heres-how-to-kill-it-for-good/comment-page-1/#comment-2544764</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Bomber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 06:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29927#comment-2544764</guid>
		<description>Then don&#039;t use it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then don&#8217;t use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vaibhav</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-is-back-heres-how-to-kill-it-for-good/comment-page-1/#comment-2544757</link>
		<dc:creator>Vaibhav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 06:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29927#comment-2544757</guid>
		<description>Okay... mark that second part as wrong. If I choose to view other people&#039;s notes, it changes the order of search results as well for me. So, that bit I said is wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay&#8230; mark that second part as wrong. If I choose to view other people&#8217;s notes, it changes the order of search results as well for me. So, that bit I said is wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vaibhav</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-is-back-heres-how-to-kill-it-for-good/comment-page-1/#comment-2544753</link>
		<dc:creator>Vaibhav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 06:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29927#comment-2544753</guid>
		<description>Actually, the original blog post on the Google Blog makes it clear that you only see other people&#039;s comments if you want to.

Also, the changes in rankings that you make are personal, and don&#039;t have any effect on the actual results for anyone else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the original blog post on the Google Blog makes it clear that you only see other people&#8217;s comments if you want to.</p>
<p>Also, the changes in rankings that you make are personal, and don&#8217;t have any effect on the actual results for anyone else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Bomber</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-is-back-heres-how-to-kill-it-for-good/comment-page-2/#comment-2544749</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Bomber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 06:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29927#comment-2544749</guid>
		<description>Amen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-is-back-heres-how-to-kill-it-for-good/comment-page-2/#comment-2544720</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 05:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29927#comment-2544720</guid>
		<description>You can&#039;t fight it.. pr0n was what the Internet was invented for. Free access to pr0n is why most folks signed up with their first Isp. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can&#8217;t fight it.. pr0n was what the Internet was invented for. Free access to pr0n is why most folks signed up with their first Isp. <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JpMaxMan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/22/google-searchwiki-is-back-heres-how-to-kill-it-for-good/comment-page-2/#comment-2544713</link>
		<dc:creator>JpMaxMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 05:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29927#comment-2544713</guid>
		<description>I actually kind of like this feature - it has a lot of potential to eliminate the search spam sites.  I&#039;m sure they will get the comment spam under control and I don&#039;t think it destroys the clean interface. 

To each his own, but I see a lot of potential here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually kind of like this feature &#8211; it has a lot of potential to eliminate the search spam sites.  I&#8217;m sure they will get the comment spam under control and I don&#8217;t think it destroys the clean interface. </p>
<p>To each his own, but I see a lot of potential here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
