<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google, It Wasn&#8217;t Broke</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/21/google-it-wasnt-broke/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/21/google-it-wasnt-broke/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 02:28:11 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Google Search Wiki &#8211; Like Forcing You To Eat The Heart of a Live Cobra</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/21/google-it-wasnt-broke/comment-page-4/#comment-3074053</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Search Wiki &#8211; Like Forcing You To Eat The Heart of a Live Cobra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29624#comment-3074053</guid>
		<description>[...] graywolf google bashing &#8230; nope Danny Sullivan noted the omission of an off switch, as did Michael Arrington of techcrunch. Of course most techno blogging fan boys fell in line, like the sheep they are [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] graywolf google bashing &#8230; nope Danny Sullivan noted the omission of an off switch, as did Michael Arrington of techcrunch. Of course most techno blogging fan boys fell in line, like the sheep they are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Counts</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/21/google-it-wasnt-broke/comment-page-4/#comment-3043123</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Counts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 07:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29624#comment-3043123</guid>
		<description>Everytime you turn around it looks like Google is doing something new. They want to serve their target market the best way possible. The method you mention in this post sounds a lot like the new Google SideWicki that came out recently for Google Toolbar users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everytime you turn around it looks like Google is doing something new. They want to serve their target market the best way possible. The method you mention in this post sounds a lot like the new Google SideWicki that came out recently for Google Toolbar users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google SideWiki Encourages Public Graffiti on Any Site : NaseerWeb Link Directory</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/21/google-it-wasnt-broke/comment-page-4/#comment-3021735</link>
		<dc:creator>Google SideWiki Encourages Public Graffiti on Any Site : NaseerWeb Link Directory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 12:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29624#comment-3021735</guid>
		<description>[...] way to Searchwiki, Google&#8217;s comment tool for search engine result pages. Searchwiki has been widely panned in the search industry because it&#8217;s Notes feature has been exploited by spammers, overactive [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] way to Searchwiki, Google&#8217;s comment tool for search engine result pages. Searchwiki has been widely panned in the search industry because it&#8217;s Notes feature has been exploited by spammers, overactive [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SiteProNews: Webmaster News &#38; Resources &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google SideWiki Encourages Public Graffiti on Any Site</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/21/google-it-wasnt-broke/comment-page-4/#comment-3007615</link>
		<dc:creator>SiteProNews: Webmaster News &#38; Resources &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google SideWiki Encourages Public Graffiti on Any Site</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 15:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29624#comment-3007615</guid>
		<description>[...] way to Searchwiki, Google&#8217;s comment tool for search engine result pages. Searchwiki has been widely panned in the search industry because it&#8217;s Notes feature has been exploited by spammers, overactive [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] way to Searchwiki, Google&#8217;s comment tool for search engine result pages. Searchwiki has been widely panned in the search industry because it&#8217;s Notes feature has been exploited by spammers, overactive [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Steps Where Many Have Stumbled: Sidewiki</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/21/google-it-wasnt-broke/comment-page-4/#comment-3000134</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Steps Where Many Have Stumbled: Sidewiki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 14:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29624#comment-3000134</guid>
		<description>[...] says Sidewiki is absolutely separate from last year&#8217;s SearchWiki, and comments/votes won&#8217;t be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] says Sidewiki is absolutely separate from last year&#8217;s SearchWiki, and comments/votes won&#8217;t be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Steps Where Many Have Stumbled: Sidewiki</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/21/google-it-wasnt-broke/comment-page-4/#comment-3000133</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Steps Where Many Have Stumbled: Sidewiki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 14:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29624#comment-3000133</guid>
		<description>[...] says Sidewiki is absolutely separate from last year&#8217;s SearchWiki, and comments/votes won&#8217;t be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] says Sidewiki is absolutely separate from last year&#8217;s SearchWiki, and comments/votes won&#8217;t be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Help Google find the search results that YOU want &#124; blog till you drop!</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/21/google-it-wasnt-broke/comment-page-4/#comment-2813832</link>
		<dc:creator>Help Google find the search results that YOU want &#124; blog till you drop!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 22:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29624#comment-2813832</guid>
		<description>[...] thanks to Robert for sending me the Techcrunch article about Google&#8217;s revamp which I missed last week as I was on holiday. Although I still like the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] thanks to Robert for sending me the Techcrunch article about Google&#8217;s revamp which I missed last week as I was on holiday. Although I still like the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Google SearchWiki Will Make Digital Point Outsourcers Rich &#124; rapid-DEV.net</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/21/google-it-wasnt-broke/comment-page-4/#comment-2801811</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Google SearchWiki Will Make Digital Point Outsourcers Rich &#124; rapid-DEV.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 05:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29624#comment-2801811</guid>
		<description>[...] of speculation has been created around Google&#8217;s introduction of SearchWiki, which is  their mandate for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of speculation has been created around Google&#8217;s introduction of SearchWiki, which is  their mandate for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/21/google-it-wasnt-broke/comment-page-4/#comment-2782217</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 04:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29624#comment-2782217</guid>
		<description>They are just added these features so they can further their control of behaviour marketing.  The data they have on a person, the more they can analyze about us.  And show the ads that appeal to us.  They don&#039;t care about us, just expanding their control over us and the marketing industry.  google is evil!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are just added these features so they can further their control of behaviour marketing.  The data they have on a person, the more they can analyze about us.  And show the ads that appeal to us.  They don&#8217;t care about us, just expanding their control over us and the marketing industry.  google is evil!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Search Wiki - Like Forcing You To Eat The Heart of a Live Cobra &#124; Reviews</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/21/google-it-wasnt-broke/comment-page-4/#comment-2752856</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Search Wiki - Like Forcing You To Eat The Heart of a Live Cobra &#124; Reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 17:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29624#comment-2752856</guid>
		<description>[...] graywolf google bashing &#8230; nope Danny Sullivan noted the omission of an off switch, as did Michael Arrington of techcrunch. Of course most techno blogging fan boys fell in line, like the sheep they are [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] graywolf google bashing &#8230; nope Danny Sullivan noted the omission of an off switch, as did Michael Arrington of techcrunch. Of course most techno blogging fan boys fell in line, like the sheep they are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Search Wiki &#124; SEOTALK.GR</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/21/google-it-wasnt-broke/comment-page-4/#comment-2752521</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Search Wiki &#124; SEOTALK.GR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 08:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29624#comment-2752521</guid>
		<description>[...] να τα καταφέρει&#8230;Ήδη έχουν αρχίσει πάντως οι πρώτες αρνητικές αντιδράσεις και κριτικές για την νέα αυτή υπηρεσία&#8230;Το σίγουρο είναι οτι όσοι [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] να τα καταφέρει&#8230;Ήδη έχουν αρχίσει πάντως οι πρώτες αρνητικές αντιδράσεις και κριτικές για την νέα αυτή υπηρεσία&#8230;Το σίγουρο είναι οτι όσοι [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Live From Google: Searchology &#124; Newsfed - Aggregate local and tech stories with related videos and tweets!</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/21/google-it-wasnt-broke/comment-page-4/#comment-2744324</link>
		<dc:creator>Live From Google: Searchology &#124; Newsfed - Aggregate local and tech stories with related videos and tweets!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 19:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29624#comment-2744324</guid>
		<description>[...] she&#8217;s talking about (the dreaded) Search Wiki. 40% of searches on any day are repeat searches for a user. The ability to mark them [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] she&#8217;s talking about (the dreaded) Search Wiki. 40% of searches on any day are repeat searches for a user. The ability to mark them [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Live From Google: Searchology &#124; CHARGED's Digital Lifestyle at Work or Play</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/21/google-it-wasnt-broke/comment-page-4/#comment-2744204</link>
		<dc:creator>Live From Google: Searchology &#124; CHARGED's Digital Lifestyle at Work or Play</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 18:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29624#comment-2744204</guid>
		<description>[...] she&#8217;s talking about (the dreaded) Search Wiki. 40% of searches on any day are repeat searches for a user. The ability to mark them [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] she&#8217;s talking about (the dreaded) Search Wiki. 40% of searches on any day are repeat searches for a user. The ability to mark them [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techhours &#187; Live From Google: Searchology</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/21/google-it-wasnt-broke/comment-page-3/#comment-2744156</link>
		<dc:creator>Techhours &#187; Live From Google: Searchology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 17:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29624#comment-2744156</guid>
		<description>[...] she&#8217;s talking about (the dreaded) Search Wiki. 40% of searches on any day are repeat searches for a user. The ability to mark them [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] she&#8217;s talking about (the dreaded) Search Wiki. 40% of searches on any day are repeat searches for a user. The ability to mark them [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Live From Google: Searchology</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/21/google-it-wasnt-broke/comment-page-3/#comment-2744142</link>
		<dc:creator>Live From Google: Searchology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 17:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29624#comment-2744142</guid>
		<description>[...] she&#8217;s talking about (the dreaded) Search Wiki. 40% of searches on any day are repeat searches for a user. The ability to mark them [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] she&#8217;s talking about (the dreaded) Search Wiki. 40% of searches on any day are repeat searches for a user. The ability to mark them [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Search Wiki - uma forma de ganhar ou de perder tráfego? &#124; Fique Rico Online</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/21/google-it-wasnt-broke/comment-page-3/#comment-2723737</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Search Wiki - uma forma de ganhar ou de perder tráfego? &#124; Fique Rico Online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 12:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29624#comment-2723737</guid>
		<description>[...] de vários experts na matéria nem sempre foi positiva acerca desta nova funcionalidade. O Techcrunch por exemplo, não gostou da ideia por detrás do novo Google Search Wiki, e fez questão do o [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] de vários experts na matéria nem sempre foi positiva acerca desta nova funcionalidade. O Techcrunch por exemplo, não gostou da ideia por detrás do novo Google Search Wiki, e fez questão do o [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Vanderhurst</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/21/google-it-wasnt-broke/comment-page-3/#comment-2688123</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Vanderhurst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 16:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29624#comment-2688123</guid>
		<description>Google got me confused one time. I thought my site was on first page but then found out that I am log in and my web history is on. So that gave me a better explanation. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google got me confused one time. I thought my site was on first page but then found out that I am log in and my web history is on. So that gave me a better explanation. <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SearchWiki Not a Signal in Search Algorithm ... Yet &#124; Blind Five Year Old</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/21/google-it-wasnt-broke/comment-page-3/#comment-2628107</link>
		<dc:creator>SearchWiki Not a Signal in Search Algorithm ... Yet &#124; Blind Five Year Old</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29624#comment-2628107</guid>
		<description>[...] functionality. It even spilled over into &#8216;mainstream&#8217; media with TechCrunch&#8217;s Michael Arrington asking Google to shelve the new [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] functionality. It even spilled over into &#8216;mainstream&#8217; media with TechCrunch&#8217;s Michael Arrington asking Google to shelve the new [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google SearchWiki: What It Is and What It Means For Your Real Estate Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/21/google-it-wasnt-broke/comment-page-3/#comment-2605744</link>
		<dc:creator>Google SearchWiki: What It Is and What It Means For Your Real Estate Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 01:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29624#comment-2605744</guid>
		<description>[...] Michael Arrington of Tech Crunch  Discuss this article in our Forums! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michael Arrington of Tech Crunch  Discuss this article in our Forums! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fruity</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/21/google-it-wasnt-broke/comment-page-3/#comment-2604971</link>
		<dc:creator>fruity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 00:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29624#comment-2604971</guid>
		<description>Dear Google, if I can&#039;t depend on your results. Who loses the most? You, me, or your shareholders? Your search results right now are worse than EBAY SEARCH RESULTS. I hope you print this out have a staff meeting over that point alone. Look at what happened to ebay when sellers could no longer trust the integrity of the system.

I dont want to be social in my google search. I want to type and get results that return results with my keywords in it. If I wanted to be social, I&#039;d go to a library and have someone with knowledge go find it for me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Google, if I can&#8217;t depend on your results. Who loses the most? You, me, or your shareholders? Your search results right now are worse than EBAY SEARCH RESULTS. I hope you print this out have a staff meeting over that point alone. Look at what happened to ebay when sellers could no longer trust the integrity of the system.</p>
<p>I dont want to be social in my google search. I want to type and get results that return results with my keywords in it. If I wanted to be social, I&#8217;d go to a library and have someone with knowledge go find it for me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Should you care about Google SearchWiki?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/21/google-it-wasnt-broke/comment-page-3/#comment-2594535</link>
		<dc:creator>Should you care about Google SearchWiki?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 09:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29624#comment-2594535</guid>
		<description>[...] through its SearchWiki offering? Given how some folks see this as the end of SEO, a train wreck, &#8220;a mess of arrows and troll comments,&#8221; should you be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] through its SearchWiki offering? Given how some folks see this as the end of SEO, a train wreck, &#8220;a mess of arrows and troll comments,&#8221; should you be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Make Google&#8217;s Results Your Own : Step Ahead</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/21/google-it-wasnt-broke/comment-page-3/#comment-2591718</link>
		<dc:creator>Make Google&#8217;s Results Your Own : Step Ahead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29624#comment-2591718</guid>
		<description>[...] with all things Google related, people are pretty quick to jump in with their opinions. Michael Arrington over at TechCrunch is not a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with all things Google related, people are pretty quick to jump in with their opinions. Michael Arrington over at TechCrunch is not a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Insoc &#187; Blog Archive &#187; SearchWiki: Google entra de lleno a las busquedas “a medida”</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/21/google-it-wasnt-broke/comment-page-3/#comment-2590523</link>
		<dc:creator>Insoc &#187; Blog Archive &#187; SearchWiki: Google entra de lleno a las busquedas “a medida”</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 18:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29624#comment-2590523</guid>
		<description>[...] hace rogar). Quizás mas interesante que realizar comentarios apresurados y arrogantes como el de Techcrunch sea tratar de interpretar que busca Google con esto y cual es su visión de las [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hace rogar). Quizás mas interesante que realizar comentarios apresurados y arrogantes como el de Techcrunch sea tratar de interpretar que busca Google con esto y cual es su visión de las [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Make Google&#8217;s Results Your Own : Step Ahead Web Strategies</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/21/google-it-wasnt-broke/comment-page-3/#comment-2581483</link>
		<dc:creator>Make Google&#8217;s Results Your Own : Step Ahead Web Strategies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 15:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29624#comment-2581483</guid>
		<description>[...] with all things Google related, people are pretty quick to jump in with their opinions. Michael Arrington over at TechCrunch is not a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with all things Google related, people are pretty quick to jump in with their opinions. Michael Arrington over at TechCrunch is not a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brelson.com &#187; 2008 - the year Google jumped the shark?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/21/google-it-wasnt-broke/comment-page-3/#comment-2576338</link>
		<dc:creator>brelson.com &#187; 2008 - the year Google jumped the shark?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 11:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29624#comment-2576338</guid>
		<description>[...] Google SearchWiki - I&#8217;m listing this first because out of all Google&#8217;s product launches this has been the first to really impact its core offering, search. The idea is that users of the feature can manipulate and personalise their search results. Someone suggested to me that it heralded the end of natural search optimisation. My prediction? The feature will be gone within 12 months. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google SearchWiki &#8211; I&#8217;m listing this first because out of all Google&#8217;s product launches this has been the first to really impact its core offering, search. The idea is that users of the feature can manipulate and personalise their search results. Someone suggested to me that it heralded the end of natural search optimisation. My prediction? The feature will be gone within 12 months. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
