<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Insidious New SEO Ad Product Will Be Hard For Google To Detect (Updated With Google Response)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/insidious-new-seo-ad-product-will-be-hard-for-google-to-detect/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/insidious-new-seo-ad-product-will-be-hard-for-google-to-detect/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 02:16:17 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: New Link Advertising Program InLinks.com from Text Link Ads</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/insidious-new-seo-ad-product-will-be-hard-for-google-to-detect/comment-page-3/#comment-3074044</link>
		<dc:creator>New Link Advertising Program InLinks.com from Text Link Ads</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29241#comment-3074044</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8211; TextLinkAds 2.0 Insidious New SEO Ad Product Will Be Hard For Google To Detect InLinks.com &#8211; TLA Launches In Links, an Inline Link Buying Program Does Google REALLY Want To [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; TextLinkAds 2.0 Insidious New SEO Ad Product Will Be Hard For Google To Detect InLinks.com &#8211; TLA Launches In Links, an Inline Link Buying Program Does Google REALLY Want To [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO &#38; Web News for the Week ending January 24, 2009 &#124; TM Web Development and Internet Marketing Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/insidious-new-seo-ad-product-will-be-hard-for-google-to-detect/comment-page-3/#comment-3059821</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO &#38; Web News for the Week ending January 24, 2009 &#124; TM Web Development and Internet Marketing Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29241#comment-3059821</guid>
		<description>[...] chimes in, once again on buying links to help with your search engine rankings. This time over at TechCrunch in response to the new InLinks product, which is a carbon copy of LinkXL. (yes, it may be a little [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] chimes in, once again on buying links to help with your search engine rankings. This time over at TechCrunch in response to the new InLinks product, which is a carbon copy of LinkXL. (yes, it may be a little [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Hats Are Dead - It&#8217;s All About Risk &#171; Internet Marketing Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/insidious-new-seo-ad-product-will-be-hard-for-google-to-detect/comment-page-3/#comment-3000588</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Hats Are Dead - It&#8217;s All About Risk &#171; Internet Marketing Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29241#comment-3000588</guid>
		<description>[...] considers buying links almost as bad as marrying your sister and eating your dog. He even recently referenced FTC guidelines that he feels provides unambiguous guidelines for paid links (now we&#8217;re getting [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] considers buying links almost as bad as marrying your sister and eating your dog. He even recently referenced FTC guidelines that he feels provides unambiguous guidelines for paid links (now we&#8217;re getting [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessie</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/insidious-new-seo-ad-product-will-be-hard-for-google-to-detect/comment-page-3/#comment-2902450</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 14:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29241#comment-2902450</guid>
		<description>If it is going to be hard for google to detect, than it probably isn&#039;t that good of an item. Or is it? I think that organic links will always be the best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it is going to be hard for google to detect, than it probably isn&#8217;t that good of an item. Or is it? I think that organic links will always be the best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seo company</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/insidious-new-seo-ad-product-will-be-hard-for-google-to-detect/comment-page-3/#comment-2871857</link>
		<dc:creator>seo company</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 12:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29241#comment-2871857</guid>
		<description>It cannot be illegal</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It cannot be illegal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Website Designer in Gurgaon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/insidious-new-seo-ad-product-will-be-hard-for-google-to-detect/comment-page-2/#comment-2865850</link>
		<dc:creator>Website Designer in Gurgaon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 13:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29241#comment-2865850</guid>
		<description>Thanks a lot .... this will really be very helpful and the matter of the fact is the whole content fall so smoothly at place .... make it very readable .... appreciate the effort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot &#8230;. this will really be very helpful and the matter of the fact is the whole content fall so smoothly at place &#8230;. make it very readable &#8230;. appreciate the effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/insidious-new-seo-ad-product-will-be-hard-for-google-to-detect/comment-page-2/#comment-2806703</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 05:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29241#comment-2806703</guid>
		<description>Inlinks is pretty much awful. Even after cancellation they continue to bill your credit card and don&#039;t reply to requests to stop that. Have to go to my CC company now and get a chargeback.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inlinks is pretty much awful. Even after cancellation they continue to bill your credit card and don&#8217;t reply to requests to stop that. Have to go to my CC company now and get a chargeback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Paid Links Service Sparks More Debate &#124; Business Marketing Experts</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/insidious-new-seo-ad-product-will-be-hard-for-google-to-detect/comment-page-2/#comment-2788697</link>
		<dc:creator>New Paid Links Service Sparks More Debate &#124; Business Marketing Experts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 00:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29241#comment-2788697</guid>
		<description>[...] &quot;Yeah, let&#8217;s stick it to Google&quot; crowd. .As far as I can tell, this started with TechCrunch reporting on InLinks, which prompted Matt Cutts to send them an email from which the following is a sample: Google has [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &quot;Yeah, let&#8217;s stick it to Google&quot; crowd. .As far as I can tell, this started with TechCrunch reporting on InLinks, which prompted Matt Cutts to send them an email from which the following is a sample: Google has [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bayram otelleri</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/insidious-new-seo-ad-product-will-be-hard-for-google-to-detect/comment-page-2/#comment-2769072</link>
		<dc:creator>Bayram otelleri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 19:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29241#comment-2769072</guid>
		<description>That’s a mistake. Shoemoney has a lot of influence (especially among the seo / sem crowd), and he’s been a long time friend of the site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That’s a mistake. Shoemoney has a lot of influence (especially among the seo / sem crowd), and he’s been a long time friend of the site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bayram otelleri</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/insidious-new-seo-ad-product-will-be-hard-for-google-to-detect/comment-page-2/#comment-2769071</link>
		<dc:creator>Bayram otelleri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 19:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29241#comment-2769071</guid>
		<description>That’s a mistake. Shoemoney has a lot of influence (especially among the seo / sem crowd), and he’s been a long time friend of the site. Instead of banning him, they should hire him to try and find other holes in the service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That’s a mistake. Shoemoney has a lot of influence (especially among the seo / sem crowd), and he’s been a long time friend of the site. Instead of banning him, they should hire him to try and find other holes in the service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Vanderhurst</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/insidious-new-seo-ad-product-will-be-hard-for-google-to-detect/comment-page-2/#comment-2755615</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Vanderhurst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 12:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29241#comment-2755615</guid>
		<description>Organic will always be the best :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Organic will always be the best <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vax SEO Reporting &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Normally, It&#8217;s a Good Thing to Get Featured on Techcrunch</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/insidious-new-seo-ad-product-will-be-hard-for-google-to-detect/comment-page-2/#comment-2744113</link>
		<dc:creator>Vax SEO Reporting &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Normally, It&#8217;s a Good Thing to Get Featured on Techcrunch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 17:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29241#comment-2744113</guid>
		<description>[...] Well, not this time. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Well, not this time. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: futurich</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/insidious-new-seo-ad-product-will-be-hard-for-google-to-detect/comment-page-2/#comment-2665945</link>
		<dc:creator>futurich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 17:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29241#comment-2665945</guid>
		<description>so is it illegal to make your blog &#039;do-follow&#039;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so is it illegal to make your blog &#8216;do-follow&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEOForumz Blog Site -Learn SEO and more.. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; New Paid Links Service Sparks More Debate</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/insidious-new-seo-ad-product-will-be-hard-for-google-to-detect/comment-page-2/#comment-2648493</link>
		<dc:creator>SEOForumz Blog Site -Learn SEO and more.. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; New Paid Links Service Sparks More Debate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 06:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29241#comment-2648493</guid>
		<description>[...] &quot;Yeah, let&#8217;s stick it to Google&quot; crowd. .As far as I can tell, this started with TechCrunch reporting on InLinks, which prompted Matt Cutts to send them an email from which the following is a sample: Google has [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &quot;Yeah, let&#8217;s stick it to Google&quot; crowd. .As far as I can tell, this started with TechCrunch reporting on InLinks, which prompted Matt Cutts to send them an email from which the following is a sample: Google has [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Paid Links Service Sparks More Debate &#124; SEO Ranking, Marketing and Tactic</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/insidious-new-seo-ad-product-will-be-hard-for-google-to-detect/comment-page-2/#comment-2637034</link>
		<dc:creator>New Paid Links Service Sparks More Debate &#124; SEO Ranking, Marketing and Tactic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29241#comment-2637034</guid>
		<description>[...] &quot;Yeah, let&#8217;s stick it to Google&quot; crowd. .As far as I can tell, this started with TechCrunch reporting on InLinks, which prompted Matt Cutts to send them an email from which the following is a sample: Google has [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &quot;Yeah, let&#8217;s stick it to Google&quot; crowd. .As far as I can tell, this started with TechCrunch reporting on InLinks, which prompted Matt Cutts to send them an email from which the following is a sample: Google has [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO &#38; Web News for the Week ending January 24, 2009 &#124; Trademark Productions Web Design &#38; SEO Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/insidious-new-seo-ad-product-will-be-hard-for-google-to-detect/comment-page-2/#comment-2604665</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO &#38; Web News for the Week ending January 24, 2009 &#124; Trademark Productions Web Design &#38; SEO Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 17:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29241#comment-2604665</guid>
		<description>[...] chimes in, once again on buying links to help with your search engine rankings. This time over at TechCrunch in response to the new InLinks product, which is a carbon copy of LinkXL. (yes, it may be a little [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] chimes in, once again on buying links to help with your search engine rankings. This time over at TechCrunch in response to the new InLinks product, which is a carbon copy of LinkXL. (yes, it may be a little [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dwight Zahringer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/insidious-new-seo-ad-product-will-be-hard-for-google-to-detect/comment-page-2/#comment-2604608</link>
		<dc:creator>Dwight Zahringer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 15:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29241#comment-2604608</guid>
		<description>Ha. This is funny time and time again. 
#1  InLinks is a dupe of LinkXL which has a hidden footprint, automation and been around for over 2 years now.

#2 Matt is really reaching for any fruit by bringing in the Federal Trade Commission and their suggestions for consumers. Google needs to revamp their algo and try not to rely so heavily on backlinks for rankings

#3 Google hates that they created a black market with PR. &quot;Opps- we didn&#039;t realize that people would make $ off our engine too, where&#039;s our cut!?&quot; (or do I say &quot;Cutts?&quot;

#4 LinkXL has the ability to add &quot;NoFollow&quot; to any link, therefore as Matt states &quot;provides a legal link that does not pass rank&quot; therefore is not a bad text link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha. This is funny time and time again.<br />
#1  InLinks is a dupe of LinkXL which has a hidden footprint, automation and been around for over 2 years now.</p>
<p>#2 Matt is really reaching for any fruit by bringing in the Federal Trade Commission and their suggestions for consumers. Google needs to revamp their algo and try not to rely so heavily on backlinks for rankings</p>
<p>#3 Google hates that they created a black market with PR. &#8220;Opps- we didn&#8217;t realize that people would make $ off our engine too, where&#8217;s our cut!?&#8221; (or do I say &#8220;Cutts?&#8221;</p>
<p>#4 LinkXL has the ability to add &#8220;NoFollow&#8221; to any link, therefore as Matt states &#8220;provides a legal link that does not pass rank&#8221; therefore is not a bad text link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TLA InLinks Officially Launched &#124; aw-aw.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/insidious-new-seo-ad-product-will-be-hard-for-google-to-detect/comment-page-2/#comment-2602527</link>
		<dc:creator>TLA InLinks Officially Launched &#124; aw-aw.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29241#comment-2602527</guid>
		<description>[...] market for this kind of service. Google blogger Matt Cutts is obviously not happy about this. He contacted TechCrunch and said : Google has been very clear that selling such links that pass PageRank is a violation of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] market for this kind of service. Google blogger Matt Cutts is obviously not happy about this. He contacted TechCrunch and said : Google has been very clear that selling such links that pass PageRank is a violation of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: inLinks Review - An Arrow to Google’s Achilles’ Heel? &#124; GetBux</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/insidious-new-seo-ad-product-will-be-hard-for-google-to-detect/comment-page-2/#comment-2577731</link>
		<dc:creator>inLinks Review - An Arrow to Google’s Achilles’ Heel? &#124; GetBux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 18:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29241#comment-2577731</guid>
		<description>[...] links and Google engineer Matt Cutts has gone as far as to say that use of the platform could be in violation of FTC guidelines (a scare tactic of course). Shoemoney rightfully responds by pointing out the hypocrisy of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] links and Google engineer Matt Cutts has gone as far as to say that use of the platform could be in violation of FTC guidelines (a scare tactic of course). Shoemoney rightfully responds by pointing out the hypocrisy of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: inLinks Review - An Arrow to Google’s Achilles’ Heel? &#171; GetBux</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/insidious-new-seo-ad-product-will-be-hard-for-google-to-detect/comment-page-2/#comment-2573959</link>
		<dc:creator>inLinks Review - An Arrow to Google’s Achilles’ Heel? &#171; GetBux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 12:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29241#comment-2573959</guid>
		<description>[...] links and Google engineer Matt Cutts has gone as far as to say that use of the platform could be in violation of FTC guidelines (a scare tactic of course). Shoemoney rightfully responds by pointing out the hypocrisy of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] links and Google engineer Matt Cutts has gone as far as to say that use of the platform could be in violation of FTC guidelines (a scare tactic of course). Shoemoney rightfully responds by pointing out the hypocrisy of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Ferguson</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/insidious-new-seo-ad-product-will-be-hard-for-google-to-detect/comment-page-2/#comment-2568070</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Ferguson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29241#comment-2568070</guid>
		<description>I have a question for everyone (including Matt Cutts) about this interesting conversation.  What if I put a simple disclosure on my blog or website that says that comments may be used to promote products that have not necessarily been reviewed by my site.   This is more in response to the dofollow or nofollow that google has been so intent on.  It is my understanding that the only reason that google does not like commenting for links is that there is no disclosure.  Google could set a uniform disclaimer for all sites that when the spider reads the disclaimer it knows that these comments have been disclosed. To go further what if I allow webmasters to place paid links on my site with a simple disclaimer on my site that states that these ads may be paid for.  Would that not meet the FTC&#039;s rules?  It seems that google is being somewhat anti-capitalist in their stance on these topics.  Maybe I am misunderstanding google&#039;s entire argument so please inform me or let me know if something like this might work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question for everyone (including Matt Cutts) about this interesting conversation.  What if I put a simple disclosure on my blog or website that says that comments may be used to promote products that have not necessarily been reviewed by my site.   This is more in response to the dofollow or nofollow that google has been so intent on.  It is my understanding that the only reason that google does not like commenting for links is that there is no disclosure.  Google could set a uniform disclaimer for all sites that when the spider reads the disclaimer it knows that these comments have been disclosed. To go further what if I allow webmasters to place paid links on my site with a simple disclaimer on my site that states that these ads may be paid for.  Would that not meet the FTC&#8217;s rules?  It seems that google is being somewhat anti-capitalist in their stance on these topics.  Maybe I am misunderstanding google&#8217;s entire argument so please inform me or let me know if something like this might work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/insidious-new-seo-ad-product-will-be-hard-for-google-to-detect/comment-page-2/#comment-2561623</link>
		<dc:creator>Seo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 17:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29241#comment-2561623</guid>
		<description>The links provide though this ads network does not meaning in link buiding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The links provide though this ads network does not meaning in link buiding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/insidious-new-seo-ad-product-will-be-hard-for-google-to-detect/comment-page-2/#comment-2561013</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 02:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29241#comment-2561013</guid>
		<description>Looks like Inlinks has been punished by Google.  Despite 100&#039;s of incoming links itself PR appears to be 0.
Plus searching for &quot;are easy on the eyes. Sell in content ads without the annoying pop up! &quot; (taken from the homepage) has multple other sites above them...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like Inlinks has been punished by Google.  Despite 100&#8217;s of incoming links itself PR appears to be 0.<br />
Plus searching for &#8220;are easy on the eyes. Sell in content ads without the annoying pop up! &#8221; (taken from the homepage) has multple other sites above them&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: InLinks.com - TLA Launches In Links, an Inline Link Buying Program</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/insidious-new-seo-ad-product-will-be-hard-for-google-to-detect/comment-page-2/#comment-2558480</link>
		<dc:creator>InLinks.com - TLA Launches In Links, an Inline Link Buying Program</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 19:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29241#comment-2558480</guid>
		<description>[...] Cutts was quick to say that this link buying program violates Google&#8217;s TOS (and might be against an FTC guideline), but Shoemoney highlighted how Google is known to look the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cutts was quick to say that this link buying program violates Google&#8217;s TOS (and might be against an FTC guideline), but Shoemoney highlighted how Google is known to look the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Normally, It&#8217;s a Good Thing to Get Featured on Techcrunch</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/insidious-new-seo-ad-product-will-be-hard-for-google-to-detect/comment-page-2/#comment-2555041</link>
		<dc:creator>Normally, It&#8217;s a Good Thing to Get Featured on Techcrunch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 19:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29241#comment-2555041</guid>
		<description>[...] Well, not this time. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Well, not this time. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
