<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Makes Up 88 Percent Of Mozilla&#8217;s Revenues, Threatens Its Non-Profit Status</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/google-makes-up-88-percent-of-mozillas-revenues-threatens-its-non-profit-status/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/google-makes-up-88-percent-of-mozillas-revenues-threatens-its-non-profit-status/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:27:02 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Goodbye to Google! - Sudarshan Acharya</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/google-makes-up-88-percent-of-mozillas-revenues-threatens-its-non-profit-status/comment-page-2/#comment-2926974</link>
		<dc:creator>Goodbye to Google! - Sudarshan Acharya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 04:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29285#comment-2926974</guid>
		<description>[...] Orkut, Friendfeed, App engine, Google Apps - Damn! Google is everywhere. Google generates 85% of Mozilla&#8217;s revenue (who knows how many of such companies) and now they even have one bastard browser called Chrome. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Orkut, Friendfeed, App engine, Google Apps &#8211; Damn! Google is everywhere. Google generates 85% of Mozilla&#8217;s revenue (who knows how many of such companies) and now they even have one bastard browser called Chrome. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: When Internet Explorer is no longer bundled with Windows » Tom Ribbens</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/google-makes-up-88-percent-of-mozillas-revenues-threatens-its-non-profit-status/comment-page-2/#comment-2597466</link>
		<dc:creator>When Internet Explorer is no longer bundled with Windows » Tom Ribbens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 14:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29285#comment-2597466</guid>
		<description>[...] although the end-users are not billed. Mozilla&#8217;s revenue for 2007 was $75 million. It even threatens their Non-Profit Status. When Internet Explorer would no longer be bundled with Windows, other browsers would have a fairer [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] although the end-users are not billed. Mozilla&#8217;s revenue for 2007 was $75 million. It even threatens their Non-Profit Status. When Internet Explorer would no longer be bundled with Windows, other browsers would have a fairer [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/google-makes-up-88-percent-of-mozillas-revenues-threatens-its-non-profit-status/comment-page-2/#comment-2578402</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 19:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29285#comment-2578402</guid>
		<description>Mozilla sure spent a lot on &quot;software developement&quot; and &quot;investments&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mozilla sure spent a lot on &#8220;software developement&#8221; and &#8220;investments&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: פיירפוקס – דפדפן עצמאי או שלוחה של גוגל? - TheMarker Cafe</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/google-makes-up-88-percent-of-mozillas-revenues-threatens-its-non-profit-status/comment-page-2/#comment-2574390</link>
		<dc:creator>פיירפוקס – דפדפן עצמאי או שלוחה של גוגל? - TheMarker Cafe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 06:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29285#comment-2574390</guid>
		<description>[...] פירסמה מוזילה את דו&quot;חותיה הכספיים ל-2007, ומהם עולה שלא פחות מ-88% מהכנסותיה באות ממקור שקצת קשה שלא להגדיר אותו כתאגיד עם מטרת [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] פירסמה מוזילה את דו&quot;חותיה הכספיים ל-2007, ומהם עולה שלא פחות מ-88% מהכנסותיה באות ממקור שקצת קשה שלא להגדיר אותו כתאגיד עם מטרת [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlphaCentauri</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/google-makes-up-88-percent-of-mozillas-revenues-threatens-its-non-profit-status/comment-page-2/#comment-2570462</link>
		<dc:creator>AlphaCentauri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 23:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29285#comment-2570462</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s hard to see how Mozilla is violating any rules that wouldn&#039;t apply to say, the Red Cross, which also has large revenues, highly paid executives, and accepts user fees for blood to offset operating costs/tests. 

If Mozilla is making that much money on a free product in a crappy economy and no one even noticed they were doing it until they filed their annual statements, their executives are doing a pretty good job of serving the public.

If people are seriously concerned, then change  Firefox to force the user to choose a default search engine. And notify the users of how much revenue is generated based on the search engines they choose. People who are happy with the free software from Mozilla can choose a search engine that pays Mozilla well; those who feel it is sullying the purity of the movement or an insult to the developers who volunteer their time can choose a search engine that doesn&#039;t pay for traffic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s hard to see how Mozilla is violating any rules that wouldn&#8217;t apply to say, the Red Cross, which also has large revenues, highly paid executives, and accepts user fees for blood to offset operating costs/tests. </p>
<p>If Mozilla is making that much money on a free product in a crappy economy and no one even noticed they were doing it until they filed their annual statements, their executives are doing a pretty good job of serving the public.</p>
<p>If people are seriously concerned, then change  Firefox to force the user to choose a default search engine. And notify the users of how much revenue is generated based on the search engines they choose. People who are happy with the free software from Mozilla can choose a search engine that pays Mozilla well; those who feel it is sullying the purity of the movement or an insult to the developers who volunteer their time can choose a search engine that doesn&#8217;t pay for traffic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google给Mozilla带来了88%的收入，威胁其非盈利地位 &#124; 紧跟IT潮流</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/google-makes-up-88-percent-of-mozillas-revenues-threatens-its-non-profit-status/comment-page-2/#comment-2546975</link>
		<dc:creator>Google给Mozilla带来了88%的收入，威胁其非盈利地位 &#124; 紧跟IT潮流</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 05:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29285#comment-2546975</guid>
		<description>[...] 消息来源：TechCrunch [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 消息来源：TechCrunch [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felini: The Strategist</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/google-makes-up-88-percent-of-mozillas-revenues-threatens-its-non-profit-status/comment-page-2/#comment-2545281</link>
		<dc:creator>Felini: The Strategist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29285#comment-2545281</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/google-makes-up-88-percent-of-mozillas-revenues-threatens-its-n...     page_revision: 10, last_edited: 1227544953&#124;%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z (%O ago)  edittags history files print site tools+&#160;options   edit sections append backlinks view source parent block rename delete          help  &#124;  terms of service  &#124;  privacy  &#124;  report a bug  &#124;  flag as objectionable   Hosted by Wikidot.com &#8212; get your free wiki now!   Unless stated otherwise Content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License          Click here to edit contents of this page.     Click here to toggle editing of individual sections of the page (if possible). Watch headings for an &quot;edit&quot; link when available.   Append content without editing the whole page source.   Check out how this page has evolved in the past.   If you want to discuss contents of this page - this is the easiest way to do it.   View and manage file attachments for this page.   A few useful tools to manage this Site.   See pages that link to and include this page.   Change the name (also URL address, possibly the category) of the page.   View wiki source for this page without editing.   View/set parent page (used for creating breadcrumbs and structured layout).   Notify administrators if there is objectionable content in this page.   Something does not work as expected? Find out what you can do.   General Wikidot.com documentation and help section.   Wikidot.com Terms of Service - what you can, what you should not etc.   Wikidot.com Privacy Policy.        _uff = false; _uacct = &quot;UA-68540-5&quot;; _udn=&quot;wikidot.com&quot;; urchinTracker(); [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/google-makes-up-88-percent-of-mozillas-revenues-threatens-its-n.." rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/google-makes-up-88-percent-of-mozillas-revenues-threatens-its-n'>http://www.tech...threatens-its-n</a>...     page_revision: 10, last_edited: 1227544953|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z (%O ago)  edittags history files print site tools+&nbsp;options   edit sections append backlinks view source parent block rename delete          help  |  terms of service  |  privacy  |  report a bug  |  flag as objectionable   Hosted by Wikidot.com &#8212; get your free wiki now!   Unless stated otherwise Content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License          Click here to edit contents of this page.     Click here to toggle editing of individual sections of the page (if possible). Watch headings for an &#8220;edit&#8221; link when available.   Append content without editing the whole page source.   Check out how this page has evolved in the past.   If you want to discuss contents of this page &#8211; this is the easiest way to do it.   View and manage file attachments for this page.   A few useful tools to manage this Site.   See pages that link to and include this page.   Change the name (also URL address, possibly the category) of the page.   View wiki source for this page without editing.   View/set parent page (used for creating breadcrumbs and structured layout).   Notify administrators if there is objectionable content in this page.   Something does not work as expected? Find out what you can do.   General Wikidot.com documentation and help section.   Wikidot.com Terms of Service &#8211; what you can, what you should not etc.   Wikidot.com Privacy Policy.        _uff = false; _uacct = &#8220;UA-68540-5&#8243;; _udn=&#8221;wikidot.com&#8221;; urchinTracker(); [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mozilla Foundation dipende pesantemente da Google &#171; GeekMarketing</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/google-makes-up-88-percent-of-mozillas-revenues-threatens-its-non-profit-status/comment-page-2/#comment-2544097</link>
		<dc:creator>Mozilla Foundation dipende pesantemente da Google &#171; GeekMarketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 09:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29285#comment-2544097</guid>
		<description>[...] [via e via] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [via e via] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OPENSOURCE BASE &#187; Blog Archiv &#187; Finanzbericht: Mozilla steht glänzend da - dank Google</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/google-makes-up-88-percent-of-mozillas-revenues-threatens-its-non-profit-status/comment-page-1/#comment-2542791</link>
		<dc:creator>OPENSOURCE BASE &#187; Blog Archiv &#187; Finanzbericht: Mozilla steht glänzend da - dank Google</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29285#comment-2542791</guid>
		<description>[...] in deren Folge Mozilla Steuern in Höhe von lediglich 100.000 US-Dollar zahlen müsse, wie TechCrunch [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in deren Folge Mozilla Steuern in Höhe von lediglich 100.000 US-Dollar zahlen müsse, wie TechCrunch [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Programas Livres &#124; PROGRAMAS LIVRES</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/google-makes-up-88-percent-of-mozillas-revenues-threatens-its-non-profit-status/comment-page-1/#comment-2542663</link>
		<dc:creator>Programas Livres &#124; PROGRAMAS LIVRES</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29285#comment-2542663</guid>
		<description>[...] Tech Crunch}    Partilhar [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tech Crunch}    Partilhar [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FirefoxSucks sucks</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/google-makes-up-88-percent-of-mozillas-revenues-threatens-its-non-profit-status/comment-page-1/#comment-2542402</link>
		<dc:creator>FirefoxSucks sucks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29285#comment-2542402</guid>
		<description>how many open source browser you know ? and r u sure u wont suck them this time</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how many open source browser you know ? and r u sure u wont suck them this time</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FirefoxSucks sucks</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/google-makes-up-88-percent-of-mozillas-revenues-threatens-its-non-profit-status/comment-page-1/#comment-2542401</link>
		<dc:creator>FirefoxSucks sucks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29285#comment-2542401</guid>
		<description>buy a opera ,safari ,maxthelon shirts too and wear a bra of microsoft</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>buy a opera ,safari ,maxthelon shirts too and wear a bra of microsoft</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anupam</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/google-makes-up-88-percent-of-mozillas-revenues-threatens-its-non-profit-status/comment-page-1/#comment-2542400</link>
		<dc:creator>anupam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29285#comment-2542400</guid>
		<description>i think firefox sud be treated as more like a open source project like Linux and is meant for them 
therse is nothing wrong if it comes to the commercial world of windows and makes some perks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think firefox sud be treated as more like a open source project like Linux and is meant for them<br />
therse is nothing wrong if it comes to the commercial world of windows and makes some perks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FirefoxSucks</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/google-makes-up-88-percent-of-mozillas-revenues-threatens-its-non-profit-status/comment-page-1/#comment-2542095</link>
		<dc:creator>FirefoxSucks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 07:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29285#comment-2542095</guid>
		<description>One more thing. I don&#039;t trust Google. Now that I know Firefox is dependent on Google for its very survival, I am not sure if I should trust Firefox. Maybe one of these days I will start digging into the code ... who knows what personal information Firefox is silently collecting ... the credibility is gone as far as I am concerned. And to think that I actually bought a Firefox t-shirt to stop feeling guilty! Damn! $75 effing million! I might as well buy an IE t-shirt!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more thing. I don&#8217;t trust Google. Now that I know Firefox is dependent on Google for its very survival, I am not sure if I should trust Firefox. Maybe one of these days I will start digging into the code &#8230; who knows what personal information Firefox is silently collecting &#8230; the credibility is gone as far as I am concerned. And to think that I actually bought a Firefox t-shirt to stop feeling guilty! Damn! $75 effing million! I might as well buy an IE t-shirt!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FirefoxSucks</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/google-makes-up-88-percent-of-mozillas-revenues-threatens-its-non-profit-status/comment-page-1/#comment-2542081</link>
		<dc:creator>FirefoxSucks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 07:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29285#comment-2542081</guid>
		<description>Firefox 3 sucks. I never complained because I thought Mozilla Foundation is a bunch of geeks doing this for free - a small, passionate, open-source group. But now I see that they are a bunch of capitalists making big bucks out of this and I don&#039;t see why I should be so tolerant anymore. I demand quality ... and I have the right because I introduced a bunch a people to Firefox who no doubt contributed to their millions. Fire the managers who were in charge of developing the new version. They did an extremely poor job. In the light of these revenue figures, &quot;Firefox download day&quot; is starting to look like a cheap marketing farce. I am ready to move on to other open-source browsers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox 3 sucks. I never complained because I thought Mozilla Foundation is a bunch of geeks doing this for free &#8211; a small, passionate, open-source group. But now I see that they are a bunch of capitalists making big bucks out of this and I don&#8217;t see why I should be so tolerant anymore. I demand quality &#8230; and I have the right because I introduced a bunch a people to Firefox who no doubt contributed to their millions. Fire the managers who were in charge of developing the new version. They did an extremely poor job. In the light of these revenue figures, &#8220;Firefox download day&#8221; is starting to look like a cheap marketing farce. I am ready to move on to other open-source browsers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How Mozilla&#8217;s Firefox Earns Money &#171; gredfo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/google-makes-up-88-percent-of-mozillas-revenues-threatens-its-non-profit-status/comment-page-1/#comment-2541987</link>
		<dc:creator>How Mozilla&#8217;s Firefox Earns Money &#171; gredfo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 05:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29285#comment-2541987</guid>
		<description>[...] How Mozilla&#8217;s Firefox Earns&#160;Money   Published November 20, 2008   business , frontpage Tags: business, google, mozilla firefox      I&#8217;ve had several discussions with people who wonder how Firefox makes money for the non-profit Mozilla Foundation. Well, here is a link to a recent article from TechCrunch: Google Makes Up 88 Percent Of Mozilla’s Revenues [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How Mozilla&#8217;s Firefox Earns&nbsp;Money   Published November 20, 2008   business , frontpage Tags: business, google, mozilla firefox      I&#8217;ve had several discussions with people who wonder how Firefox makes money for the non-profit Mozilla Foundation. Well, here is a link to a recent article from TechCrunch: Google Makes Up 88 Percent Of Mozilla’s Revenues [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisJF</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/google-makes-up-88-percent-of-mozillas-revenues-threatens-its-non-profit-status/comment-page-1/#comment-2541767</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisJF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 01:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29285#comment-2541767</guid>
		<description>Please read this:

Mike Beltzner wrote to me saying that the article is full of inaccuracies.
The Mozilla Corporation is not registered as a non-profit entity, pays taxes, receives revenues, etc. The Mozilla Foundation is a non-profit organization, and its status is not under question. Google does not provide funds to Mozilla as &quot;charity&quot;; it&#039;s a negotiated revenue deal, and they make more money off of the traffic generated than they pay to Mozilla. It&#039;s easy to forget that, but this is not a charity issue; it&#039;s an &quot;affinity&quot; revenue sharing deal.
http://gemal.dk/blog/2008/11/20/mozilla_foundation_nonprofit_no_more/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please read this:</p>
<p>Mike Beltzner wrote to me saying that the article is full of inaccuracies.<br />
The Mozilla Corporation is not registered as a non-profit entity, pays taxes, receives revenues, etc. The Mozilla Foundation is a non-profit organization, and its status is not under question. Google does not provide funds to Mozilla as &#8220;charity&#8221;; it&#8217;s a negotiated revenue deal, and they make more money off of the traffic generated than they pay to Mozilla. It&#8217;s easy to forget that, but this is not a charity issue; it&#8217;s an &#8220;affinity&#8221; revenue sharing deal.<br />
<a href="http://gemal.dk/blog/2008/11/20/mozilla_foundation_nonprofit_no_more/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://gemal.dk/blog/2008/11/20/mozilla_foundation_nonprofit_no_more/'>http://gemal.dk...profit_no_more/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ntopics</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/google-makes-up-88-percent-of-mozillas-revenues-threatens-its-non-profit-status/comment-page-1/#comment-2541582</link>
		<dc:creator>ntopics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29285#comment-2541582</guid>
		<description>This sounds outstanding! To make this much money, yet be
freeware. Rumor that Microsoft may offer Windows 7 as freeware.
Mozilla kicks!

thanks from tony</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounds outstanding! To make this much money, yet be<br />
freeware. Rumor that Microsoft may offer Windows 7 as freeware.<br />
Mozilla kicks!</p>
<p>thanks from tony</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daily Research &#187; Shared Items - November 20, 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/google-makes-up-88-percent-of-mozillas-revenues-threatens-its-non-profit-status/comment-page-1/#comment-2541497</link>
		<dc:creator>Daily Research &#187; Shared Items - November 20, 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 21:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29285#comment-2541497</guid>
		<description>[...] Google Makes Up 88 Percent Of Mozilla’s Revenues, Threatens Its Non-Profit Status [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google Makes Up 88 Percent Of Mozilla’s Revenues, Threatens Its Non-Profit Status [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/google-makes-up-88-percent-of-mozillas-revenues-threatens-its-non-profit-status/comment-page-1/#comment-2541400</link>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29285#comment-2541400</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand why Google came up with Chrome??? If Mozilla is their charitable/non-profit arm...then why waste money on a new junk browser. 

I think Mozilla should be Google.org

http://www.livbit.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand why Google came up with Chrome??? If Mozilla is their charitable/non-profit arm&#8230;then why waste money on a new junk browser. </p>
<p>I think Mozilla should be Google.org</p>
<p><a href="http://www.livbit.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.livbit.com'>http://www.livbit.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raport finansowy Mozilli at stream of bytes</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/google-makes-up-88-percent-of-mozillas-revenues-threatens-its-non-profit-status/comment-page-1/#comment-2541389</link>
		<dc:creator>Raport finansowy Mozilli at stream of bytes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 19:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29285#comment-2541389</guid>
		<description>[...] mnóstwo osób pyta mnie dziś o raport finansowy Mozilli i związany z nim artykuł na TechCrunch, a dziennikarze chwycili za pióra coby opisać jakież to straszne rzeczy nam grożą (i tak: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mnóstwo osób pyta mnie dziś o raport finansowy Mozilli i związany z nim artykuł na TechCrunch, a dziennikarze chwycili za pióra coby opisać jakież to straszne rzeczy nam grożą (i tak: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/google-makes-up-88-percent-of-mozillas-revenues-threatens-its-non-profit-status/comment-page-1/#comment-2541332</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29285#comment-2541332</guid>
		<description>It strikes me as incredibly odd that almost everything I&#039;ve read on this subject, both the editorials and the associated comments, fail to recognize that if it wasn&#039;t google who was paying for the search referrals it would be someone else. 

The false observation is made again and again that since google makes up the majority of the search referral revenue they have some kind of hold on mozilla. This makes no sense because the default search provider could just as easily be yahoo, or ask jeeves, or live, or anyone else. There could conceivably be fluctuations on the amount paid, total and per referral, but the simple fact is Firefox sports a very valuable piece of real estate that could be monetized in any number of ways. Fundamentally this real estate has NOTHING TO DO WITH GOOGLE.

The value is in Firefox and it&#039;s search bar. This value exists independently of Google. The fact that google is the primary renter of this piece of real estate does not mean they own it and it doesn&#039;t mean Mozilla couldn&#039;t find another suitor if it so choose to look for one.

Google doesn&#039;t own Mozilla people. Look a couple steps past the obvious. If that money wasn&#039;t coming from them it would be coming from someone else or a group of someone elses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It strikes me as incredibly odd that almost everything I&#8217;ve read on this subject, both the editorials and the associated comments, fail to recognize that if it wasn&#8217;t google who was paying for the search referrals it would be someone else. </p>
<p>The false observation is made again and again that since google makes up the majority of the search referral revenue they have some kind of hold on mozilla. This makes no sense because the default search provider could just as easily be yahoo, or ask jeeves, or live, or anyone else. There could conceivably be fluctuations on the amount paid, total and per referral, but the simple fact is Firefox sports a very valuable piece of real estate that could be monetized in any number of ways. Fundamentally this real estate has NOTHING TO DO WITH GOOGLE.</p>
<p>The value is in Firefox and it&#8217;s search bar. This value exists independently of Google. The fact that google is the primary renter of this piece of real estate does not mean they own it and it doesn&#8217;t mean Mozilla couldn&#8217;t find another suitor if it so choose to look for one.</p>
<p>Google doesn&#8217;t own Mozilla people. Look a couple steps past the obvious. If that money wasn&#8217;t coming from them it would be coming from someone else or a group of someone elses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roundup: Job report hurts stocks, BlackBerry reviews surface and more &#187; VentureBeat</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/google-makes-up-88-percent-of-mozillas-revenues-threatens-its-non-profit-status/comment-page-1/#comment-2541327</link>
		<dc:creator>Roundup: Job report hurts stocks, BlackBerry reviews surface and more &#187; VentureBeat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29285#comment-2541327</guid>
		<description>[...] IRS auditing Mozilla&#8217;s nonprofit status &#8212; At issue is how to classify the money Mozilla receives from Google, which made up a whopping 88 percent of Mozilla&#8217;s revenue in 2008. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] IRS auditing Mozilla&#8217;s nonprofit status &#8212; At issue is how to classify the money Mozilla receives from Google, which made up a whopping 88 percent of Mozilla&#8217;s revenue in 2008. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oni</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/google-makes-up-88-percent-of-mozillas-revenues-threatens-its-non-profit-status/comment-page-1/#comment-2541299</link>
		<dc:creator>oni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29285#comment-2541299</guid>
		<description>Mozilla the &quot;charitable arm of Google&quot;? Do you have any proof whatsoever about that? Because until then it&#039;s just spouting bullshit. People like you don&#039;t deserve the name of &quot;journalist&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mozilla the &#8220;charitable arm of Google&#8221;? Do you have any proof whatsoever about that? Because until then it&#8217;s just spouting bullshit. People like you don&#8217;t deserve the name of &#8220;journalist&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irrational</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/google-makes-up-88-percent-of-mozillas-revenues-threatens-its-non-profit-status/comment-page-1/#comment-2541294</link>
		<dc:creator>Irrational</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=29285#comment-2541294</guid>
		<description>Shouldn&#039;t the Church of Scientology lose its non-profit status, too?  That hasn&#039;t happened yet, so I don&#039;t expect it to happen to the Mozilla Foundation any time soon.

At least the Mozilla Foundation is legit...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shouldn&#8217;t the Church of Scientology lose its non-profit status, too?  That hasn&#8217;t happened yet, so I don&#8217;t expect it to happen to the Mozilla Foundation any time soon.</p>
<p>At least the Mozilla Foundation is legit&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
