Miss World is going digital. While many American readers may not be familiar with the competition (it isn’t the one owned by Donald Trump – that’s Miss Universe), Miss World is one of the world’s most popular televised events, and has a huge international audience. This year the competition has partnered with Amuso, a New York based media platform that specializes in contests, to bring the popularity of Miss World to the web. The competition’s portal at MissWorld.com will now offer a social network centered around the Miss World competitors, allowing users to send them messages, view photos, read about their interests, and vote on their favorite candidate.
When the competition’s finale airs this December, these votes will be tallied to determine the winner of the People’s Choice, automatically placing the candidate in the final pool of 7 nominees for the top prize. The site will also offer content from the month-long Miss World Festival leading up to the event in Johannesburg, South Africa. To help distribute the content, Amuso has partnered with portals around the world, including AOL, which will promote Miss World on AOL UK, France, and Germany, as well as on its social network Bebo.
Besides running the Miss World portal, Amuso’s primary product is a platform for online contests, allowing users to create their own versions of American Idol, Next Top Model, or whatever else they can think of, each with cash prizes. To participate in a contest, users are charged one dollar for each photograph or video submitted (the type of file depends on the contest – a beauty pageant may ask for images, while a singing contest would ask for video footage). The Amuso platform allows the contest administrator to control how voting proceeds (for example, photos can be paired off as voters choose which one they like better, or they can be presented individually with a 10 point scale). The Amuso video player also includes integrated thumbs up/down voting.

At the conclusion of the competition, the winner receives 50% of the proceeds, while the contest’s original creator gets 15% and Amuso takes 25%, along with 10% for transaction fees. If a charity conducts a competition, all of these fees are waived.
While Amuso seems to be tackling two very different spaces – catering to both large, established competitions and smaller user-created contests – it seems to be doing well on both fronts. By charging $1 per submission it is effectively monetizing user-generated content, while simultaneously ensuring the quality of its competitions (spammers are much less likely to ruin this kind of competition if they have to pay). And while much of Miss World’s audience may come from countries that are harder to monetize, the upcoming pageant is likely to drive a significant number of new users to Amuso’s platform.










.
We are very familiar with this pageant. Great news about Amuso
A relative of one of our colleagues is competing this year; she just left for South Africa over the weekend.
The pageant gets over One Billion TV viewers from around the world and 100 global contestants spend an entire month there preparing for the big day
thanks amuso, hope to see more chicks..
miss world, eh? cool!!
check out the adult version
missworldxxx dot com
hahaa
great concept. good luck to amuso!
Great idea!
You have to pay to join a competition, isn’t this like gambling? Aren’t there laws against this kind of online competitions in the US?
Wow.. Big change
I don’t care if you cannot play in all us states! I can and i love my game shows on amuso. For me it really works fine and with more and more users amuso gets better and better!
MISS UNIVERSE is still the best.Miss World coronation is so booooring and revolting.Miss World will always be a copycat of Miss Universe no matter how hard Ms World try to sell its pageant.
@Mik – wouldn’t this be more like skill-gaming? Much more accessible/legal in the US; they’re on to a winner if it is