I guess the upside is that a stock can’t fall below zero, so there’s an end in sight to the ongoing destruction of jobs and shareholder wealth at Yahoo. The stock closed at $13.76 today, down another 5.6%. And this isn’t just part of the market’s overall meltdown - the Nasdaq fell just 0.8% today, and Google, Yahoo’s main direct competitor, was down just 2.3%.
At this point I’ve moved beyond wondering how Yahoo’s senior management manages to keep themselves in power. The private equity funds who agreed to let Yang and Decker stay in power after the shareholder vote last summer have some real explaining to do to their investors, too.
Yahoo has no game plan, and the markets tend to notice these things. It’s time for an intervention.
See all
Post
Wow. What a bargain. I only wish I had some money to invest. lol
It’s trading at a 30 P/E on 2008 earnings. How is it a bargain?
That’s incorrect. It’s trading at 19 P/E - and google is at 22 P/E.
P/E is not everything. Like if the earing is 0, then the price should be down to 0 also?
@ Kevin, in some respects you’re right, you cant just look at P/E, but you can really only ignore it if there is something going on to lead you to believe that the E will grow and “catch up”.
So what are Yahoo doing that makes you think an inflated P/E is justified?
$13.61/$0.45 = 30 P/E.
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/ae?s=YHOO
Will someone please buy these guys…Everyday seems to be a new low. It’s clear the current management team has been unable to move the company forward in a positive fashion. Who out there besides Microsoft could step in and help Yahoo get back on its feet?
I wondered the exact same thing when I read this. I wonder if they’re rethinking the Microsoft deal? In a way, they have to. If I had some cash, I would probably be jumping in there to buy some Yahoo with the anticipation of a Microsoft by out (of course, that might be premature, but pobably not a terrible idea).
Jake
NoteScribe: Premier Notes Software
An absolute steal!
We’re in for 25% growth for 2009 according to Blake!
http://www.slideshare.net/redu.....on-329594/
Well at least they are not getting sued….
Hmm. I’ll admit confusion. MA- I believe you were a pretty big critic of Yahoo’s outsourcing deal to Google. This deal would almost certainly help the stock in the short term since it brings increased $ through the door. (I understand your argument about it being bad for them long term.) But, in the short term, because of not getting this fairly significant additional revenue, their stock is getting hurt.
So, you’re calling them morons for letting the stock price get so low. Yet, you’re against what they want to do to help the ticker in the short-term.
I’m not defending Yahoo’s management in general, but it seems like you’re having your cake and eating it too. Or however that saying goes.
I haz gotta buy some yahoo shares
May Yahoo eventually survive from this crisis?
Uh, lets see. World’s most visited website. #1 Mail. #1 News. #1 Sports. #2 Search at what, like 20%?
They’re going to be just fine.
#1 Sports — lol. In general this comment is outdated.
Mark, sports might be “lol” to you, but most likely because you never make it out of your mom’s basement. So you know, the “sports vertical” is probably one of the most lucrative sponsorship vehicles in advertising.
Mom’s calling.
Specifically Fantasy Football where Y! kills. Mark, read up on the engagement numbers for fantasy users. The #’s are much higher than other sites, probably the dream demographic for sponsors.
No Yahoo! property is #1 without massive Yahoo! network distribution - most importantly, front page distribution. The company was late to realize that it’s various properties’ success was 95% contingent on grabbing traffic from the Yahoo! network.
“#1 Sports — lol. In general this comment is outdated.”
In general I don’t find having the most visitors the last three months as outdated. Note the 16.3 million uniques gap between them and ESPN in August.
Comscore Numbers
August
1. Yahoo Sports - 38.4 million uniques.
2. NBC Sports - 23.8 million uniques
3. ESPN - 22.1 million uniques
July
1. Yahoo Sports - 21,851,000 unique readers.
2. ESPN - 18,101,000 unique readers.
3. Fox Sports - 14,644,000 unique readers.
June
1. Yahoo Sports: 22,752,000 uniques
2. ESPN: 20,601,000 uniques
3. Fox Sports: 15,105,000 uniques
Source: http://thebiglead.com/?s=comscore
Having users is great, really.
Not being able to sell ads against them makes all those users worthless & highlights the firm’s incompetence.
milton - that can be said about facebook too
Keeping a level head and having a long time horizon will pay dividends in these markets. Unclear where the “bottom” is. But you can know for sure that 5 years from now, Yahoo!, EBAY, and GOOG will be around…and kicking.
This is the most biased post I have ever read. What do you have with Yahoo?? The markets are falling and you are blaming Yang… Come on, get real.
You might want to blame Yang for not taking a buyout offer at over twice the current share price.
Maybe you’re right. The price would likely be (effectively) much higher if Yahoo laid off all the people that would be let go in a merger.
In 2003, no one was giving Apple much of a chance as it languished in the single digits.
Mod parent up.
I’ve seen more development come out of Yahoo’s dev teams lately than several better-performing companies — see Yahoo’s YUI, Calendar, integration, etc.
How many yahoo shills does it take to move the needle on the stock price?
You are ultra-biased and incapable of subjective critical analysis.
*Take a seat over there* >>>>
So many good web2.0s useless after sold yahoo…
So, when does MSFT swoop in and make them an offer that can’t refuse?
Honestly, I’m embarassed about choosing Yahoo! Mail.. but it’s only the most sophisticated on-line e-mail there is. I can’t stand - or maybe I’m too much of a simpleton - to get all the hype about gmail — I think it sux. It barely looks cool - I’m a geek and I’m confused. But Yahoo’s mail, with its multiple tabs, is very cool. Its search sucks admittedly, and it has its own idiosyncrasies, but as an e-mail composer - for a person who multi-tasks with multiple e-mails, to and from, with multi-drafts - Yahoo Mail is great.
For that reason, like above, Yahoo! should recover.
~ Vikram
PracticeMarketingAdvisors.com
Amen to that. Y! Mail, once you get past the load time (which is about 5 seconds - multitask in the meantime, people!), is way better than the mess that is Gmail.
I think Google in general needs to start spending some decent money on design and aesthetics. This does not mean fancy graphics etc - you can be minimalistic and yet visually pleasing. Better font selection, white-spacing, color selection. Right now it looks like an artistically challenged 4 year old has selected the design palette.
What the fuck is practice marketing advisors? Do you sell synergy and sales secrets?
Just for clarification, the reasons many people use gmail are size (mine is at 8GB now), uncluttered interface, and extremely fast searches.
Gmail is extremely ugly and the “labels” are downright stupid. I want folders and a clean inbox not labels that reduce every email to something Google can easily attach ads to or spy on (which is how they offer Gmail for free).
Live Hotmail is on par with Yahoo also - plus it has integration with Skydrive, Live Messenger, Calendar and Live Spaces. Live is the best of the three and definitely not going anywhere…
Yahoo mail has unlimited storage as well.
Yahoo sucks because of banner adverts everywhere and appended adverts to emails.
It is gaudy and overly commercial………………..pure CHEEZ!
Lol, no comprende Labels? LOLOLOLOLOL and still laughing.
Speed is king!
But Yahoo Mail’s problem is that they cannot make much money from it (or I cannot see how) - the only ads I see in my Yahoo Mail are two ads in the main welcome page… and no ads elsewhere… how are they supposed to make a profit like this? (And the two ads are seemingly random as well - not contextual based…)
I love yahoo mail, and the search is 2000x better than Outlook which sits on my client. I totally love yahoo mail over gmail.
I remember there was even an offer somewhere in the mid to high 30’s per share from Microsoft for Yahoo and Yang and company turned it down. For their stock to have fallen this low just shows how poorly the company is being ran. If I was an investor or stock holder, I’d be pretty upset right about now.
Perhaps Microsoft could buy almost 50% of Google shares with the same $ that Yahoo rejected (45bn)
Goog’s capital structure is completely different. The triumvirate won’t ever lose control unless they choose.
http://online.wsj.com/public/q.....;mod=DNH_S - I’ll get my stock info from Wall Street Journal, Arrington. Dude, give it up about Yahoo, they’ve been worse.
They’re 52 week low is still .26 lower than where they are now. In case you haven’t noticed, the market’s not doing so great - in general. Bashing a company that just launched an analytics program, updated calendar, and enhanced their email experience on a site with this much traffic is sorely irresponsible and far from doing the community your a part of a greater service.
When companies of this size go through changes are hard ships, the community should support their successes, and note their weaknesses. Not prematurely bash the crap out of’m because of some personal god-knows-what. Yang turn you down for a date back in college or something?
Per Assey:
You’re completely ignoring the fact Yahoo could have cashed in their chips at $33!! The thing is worth $14 today. Now they’re talking about laying people off, what incompetent management with complete disregard for employees & shareholder value! The same people would have jobs if MSFT & YHOO joined forces…or they’be be guaranteed a very nice severance at the very least.
The idiots in Sunnyvale are as bright as the folks who rode the wave from 1997-2000 only to take the elevator right back down through 2002.
“Maybe” a layoff now, definitely a layoff in a merger. Where’s the smart money?
Yahoo is here to stay
You compare them with google, so try using yahoo finance to do a 3 month chart comparison of yahoo vs goog
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?.....amp;c=goog
They are almost identical charts…
Then compare with Apple:
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?.....amp;c=aapl
You’re completely ignoring the fact Yahoo could have cashed in their chips at $33!! The thing is worth $14 today. Now they’re talking about laying people off, what incompetent management with complete disregard for employees & shareholder value! The same people would have jobs if MSFT & YHOO joined forces…or they’be be guaranteed a very nice severance at the very least.
The idiots in Sunnyvale are as bright as the folks who rode the wave from 1997-2000 only to take the elevator right back down through 2002.
Just for fun, I though I would do a Historical Quote check on YHOO, semi-randomly on 12/12/1998 — back in the days when I had a bunch of YHOO stock. Oh for those days…
Date Price High Low Volume
12/10/98 192.75 202.00 188.63 5,993,500
Apart from the fact that the toy world of 1998 doesn’t exist anymore, I thought it was interesting to look at the Volume. Nearly 6 million shares traded back then. Today, there were more than 43 million. I guess that also tells you how easy it is to get YHOO these days compared to the halcyon days of my past. Man, I miss having massive YHOO and MSFT and RNWK (or whatever Real was) and the like on my daily e*trade screen. OK, back in the present, time to wake up from dream…
I don’t know why there is so much criticism of yahoo. I’m in marketing, and continue to go back to yahoo. I keep trying the other options out there. As far as PPC goes, Google gets more hit, but it seems yahoo has better qualified customers. As far as interface goes, yahoo’s webhosting is cheap and works good. Googles analytics is a better for tracking, but yahoo is catching up.
Overall, they may not have 50 beta products in the works such as Google, but they do offer a more stable and trustworthy platfrom than the others.
Funny & Smart Political-Pop Culture T’s
http://www.showyourthoughts.com
Would anyone be surprise if Yahoo heads to Deadpool? If Jerry Yang wasn’t too greedy or proud and accepted Ballmer’s deal, all shareholders would be laughing all the way to the bank. Today, the stock is down more than 50%. What a pity? I just wonder how YHOO shareholders feel today.
been here before. got out of it. do it again.
Yahoo need to die. Human rights violator to the core.
You must have a lot of money invested in Yahoo’s competitors. I hope the bile and schadenfreude you reserve for one of the largest employers of skilled technical minds in the valley helps you sleep at night.
Holy shit dude… we are fucked
Do Jerry and Sue go home and pound their heads into the wall for pissing away $25B in value in the course of 9 months?
Folks like Bill Miller and others have no clue as to what is happening on a day to day basis within the company — yet Sue and Jerry sweet talks these investors into trusting them with fabricating predictions about a turn-around that is right around the corner. Yet, the reality is rather sad Sue is largely incapable of making and driving operational and product decisions — she is out of her league.
Ballmer got lucky because of Jerry irrational behavior. I am sure Ballmer must be thanking Jerry for walking away from the deal.
Had Microsoft bought Yahoo at $33, this would have been such a disaster for MS.
If MS bought Yahoo their stock wouldn’t have fallen. Yahoo has no plan beyond not being bought by Microsoft. MS had plans to incorporate Live Search into Yahoo, do things with Flickr, Yahoo Mail, etc.
MS would have really benefited from this.
Has anyone seen the news on Valleywag where the CFO wants to give minimum severance and Sue “scheming” to boot Jerry…hilarious!
Any Yahoo people care to share their thoughts??
jerry yang, sue decker and bush need to get together and write a book about leadership. so inspiring.
you guys are vicious. this is not funny anymore. if only they had a killerstartup in there arsenal.
http://www.killerstartups.com/.....or-network
RecoveryLocator.com
you are so freaking annoying with you ABCLocator spam. Do you actually thinking you are bringing any good publicity to your site?
What the fuck are these abortion links that slime out of all your posts? I don’t get it.
PROTIP: make something decent. That way, people will use it and tell their friends instead of you having to smut peddle these awful links every where. Let me guess - you read the book The Secret?
It’s called PageRank.
If they are really after upping their PageRank, I am sure Google’s policy prohibits spamming their URL every”F”where. Is there a way to complain to Google?
@dude
no ads on my site, not here for traffic. i am here to share. when you have something to share show it.
hope is few and far between for yahope. just as it is for all the mumbo jumbo bubble sites that have no foundation and proliferate the startup community. there is little innovation left on the net. Im sorry if your in love with slammer and pukegirls. yahope needs all the help it can get. right now they have no light at the end of this tunnel. I am a beacon of light for any one serious about having a massive location based strategic natural language footprint the internet. Like i said one day me and Mike will meet and he will saying nothing but good things about me. Powerset was a fluke. I am the real deal whether you like it or not.
PowerLocator.com - Natural Language Location
http://professionallocator.nin...../mylocator
@locator spammer dude
“I am a beacon of light for any one serious about having a massive location based strategic natural language footprint the internet.”
Are you certified insane? All that you share are lame *locator domains all linking to a ever more lame ning social network, for god’s sake!!! Zeez…
@jk-
money where your mouth is.
http://www.vator.tv/pitch/show.....an-jose-ca
GodLocator.com- let there be light!
you tool, how many different people have to tell you to stop posting your shit..???
You have shared your “inovation” with us, and all your ning networks (really inovative by the way, because setting up a ning network is so fucking hard HA)
but the network with the most users is 3 (1 you, 1 your mom, 1 your friend)
From you link:
http://www.vator.tv/pitch/show.....an-jose-ca (PEOPLE READ THIS, it will make you laugh out loud)
“A 1200 channel network of locator engines for every subject. First to Pioneer Vertical Locator Cluster Technology. ”
“Pioneer of Vertical Locator Cluster Technology Most Valuable Collection of Strategic web properties ever created. 1200+ locator engines. First to solve search. King of Location. ”
what the hell is vertical locator cluster technology really mean? to you and your wisdom it really is a ning network with 1200 groups… (3 members total)
Since the search is based on user input how does 3 users make your “cluster” (it is a cluster but more like a cluster fuck) solve search? What can I find on your ning network that I can’t find on google, yahoo, live, ask?
Here is my favorite
“Founded in: 1999
Stage: Revenue generating
Number of employees: 1-5
Completed funding: Self-Funded
Profitable year: already profitable”
Lets break that down, you have 1200 domains ($10 reg fee) thats $12000 invested every year, you admit you don’t have ads, you don’t charge for member ship… so explain to me how exactly is it “already profitable”…
Also a tech tip for you if you register 1200 domains, don’t forward them to the main ning site, forward them to the correct group within your ning site (TheOwnerOfLocatorsIsAfuckHeadLocator.com would point to the “i’m a dumb ass” group on your ning site)
One last thing, if its innovative people will join, people would not bash you all the time but to be around since 99 and have 3 members speaks volumes to how usefull you shit service is…
ADMIN PleASe PLEASE ban his IP from your site….
@Pure Envy- AKA “Phantom Hater” you just made history. your now a legend. sooner or later you will be revealed. sissy.
some things “appreciate” in life and some dont.
your like a crank call scared to show your identity.
you need to look up the definition of spam.
LostLocator.com- Help Yourself.
Heres Breakfast.
http://professionallocator.nin.....deo%3A4108
LMAO. Guys, I have tried and he is relentless.
He may not know html, js, css, php, ruby python, perl, java, or what an algorithm is exactly (he thinks it is spam), but he can use a comment form and register domains. And, he will not stop.
He is on disability from the LAPD hoping to get rich on the dotcom boom (he doesn’t now about 2001), so he has nothing better to do. he certainly doesn’t know about http://dir.yahoo.com
I just love the comments left in this Locator Section of TC! Sorta brightens my day with humor…
@ThisIsFunCommentatorLocator
im sure we could “all” use a good smile or two around here!
humor is the best medicine. i knew there was a redeeming value here. If that is my only redemption of the day so be it. i appreciate everything that appreciates.
ComedyLocator.com
How am I a sissy? Ohh because I post anonymous posts…. Ok call me sissy or coward if I don’t want my personal views tied to my company. Unlike you I can afford to be anonymous in what I post because I don’t need the links to my sites, because I unlike you have a useful service that people pay good money for, and I do traditional networking/advertising, along with text ads. Am I rich no, am I poor no, do I make a good living YES. You see the problem with posting your personal believes and tying them to your companies via links is this…. People have different views and sometimes those personal views get mixed in with their purchasing decisions, tying your views to your company can cause you to lose sales.
So you go ahead and call me “sissy”, but the bank will keep calling me “preferred”, and my friends and family will keep calling me “successful”.
I have questions and please answer them, if you answer them honestly I will stop replying to your spam, if not I will post them to every comment I ever see you make.
1. Is this you (http://www.xtremelocator.com/) if so this is good, and can see the use for it.?
2. What exactly does your service do? I mean I watched your video declaring you “king of location” but I can’t locate anything on your site, so what does your site currently provide, and what does it hope to provide?
3. I thought it was used to locate things, so say I wanted to find bibles I would go to bibleslocator.com, if I wanted prostitutes I would go to prostitutelocator.com, watches go to watcheslocator.com? Yet when I go to watcheslocator.com I don’t get presented with watches I get NOTHING, ohh I have to go to watchlocator.com, but I don’t get watches their either, no I get http://professionallocator.ning.com/ that shows me videos of “votelocator.com” not exactly what I wanted is it? So I see other locators to the left side, nope watches not there either, let’s try clicking on all 78 (how does 1200 domains translate to only 78 of the locators?), wait it’s not their either… hmmm I guess I can’t locate watches in the new and improved way to search for things???? That sucks, can I go back to the old way of search?
4. Explain to me how a directory listing of all content is better than the current search? I mean currently I go to the search engine of my choice, there is a box I type in what I want, and they display sites that match my search (takes all of 5 seconds). Your I type in almostanythinglocator.com and I am redirected to a main page then I have to find the category I want, then have to dig through the stuff (and what determines the display order) to find a site or content (this takes allot longer), and has been done, yahoo dir, dmoz, and many others, this same principle is on all classifieds, ebay, and any other listing service (yet because this method sucks, they all have what…. A search box).
5. Your own site has a search box, so I am supposed to abandon current search methods, to come to your site and use the current search method to find the correct group so I can then use the “new search method”?
6. How are you profitable? 1200+ domains cost you a minimum of 12,000 a year for reg alone, not including man hours, hosting, paying ning to remove the ads, so how are you making money from all your time?
7. Why did you go with xxxLocator.com incurring a 10 yearly fee for each one, running the risk of someone owning one you want, when you could have done subdomains? X.mylocator.com, x2.mylocator.com and so on?
8. I want to find information on the latest Chevy prototype, explain to me step by step how I find that using your locator? Or I want to find out about Levis how step by step can I do that using your service? I couldn’t figure it out on my own. (maybe I’m stupid, or maybe your service needs allot of work?)
@Envy you are giving him free publicity.. Not worth it.
Man that is tough for Yahoo. How do they expect to rebound. Are we seeing a meltdown of the entire company? Check this out: http://www.rawhidenation.com
Ya… and Apple closed at HALF of what it was in mid-August.
I guess it was head-on collision.
Steve Jobs in one train, Yang in the other.
That’s a simpleton’s view of the situation:
You’re completely ignoring the fact Yahoo could have cashed in their chips at $33 a few short months ago! The thing is worth $14 today. Now they’re talking about laying people off, what incompetent management with complete disregard for employees & shareholder value! The same people would have jobs if MSFT & YHOO joined forces…or they’be be guaranteed a very nice severance at the very least.
The idiots in Sunnyvale are as bright as the folks who rode the wave from 1997-2000 only to take the elevator right back down through 2002.
I would never invest in YaHoO stock, cause Jerry Yang himself is a “stock FLOP”…lol
For those making predictions like, “Yahoo is here to stay”, the same might have been said about Lehmans, Bear Stearns, WaMu, Fannie & Freddie, etc.
No matter how you slice it, $33 in the hand is better than $14 in the bush…especially about now.
So, you think if the Yahoo’s management team were different this wouldn’t happen? Please…
Any other management team would have taken $33 8 months ago. The employees would have taken $33.
No doubt about it.
Well, hopefully the Sox will win the series if you get my drift.
Cubs all the way!
Train Wreck? You are to kind, it’s a cluster f*ck!
Yahoo is still not “cheap” on a price-to-[insert whatever metric you want] ratio. Half of the company is a throwaway, but the other half is great. In order to fix it, the MUST bring in new blood. The existing people are too close emotionally to make the required changes. They need to go too, unfortunately.
this too shall pass for Y! . They are just going to be fine.
Yahoo will die soon, it sent its user to Jail in China because of human rights, which thing could a company do worse than that? Yahoo is evil, it must die.
A lot of Left-Wing CEO’s are killing a lot of companies.. Coincidence?
Rumors suggesting a $8 billion spurge on AOL might have also caused this drop. If you buy Yahoo now, the only hope for you to get a return is thru a merger with Microsoft.
A dissenting view:
You are too emotionally invested in bashing Yahoo to see that its share price fall is just slightly worse than average. In fact, this is now the worst year-to-date for stocks ever. Yahoo’s underperformance, while noticeable, is hardly a “train wreck.”
(Don’t own shares, and wouldn’t buy ‘em).
That’s a simpleton’s view of the situation:
You’re completely ignoring the fact Yahoo could have cashed in their chips at $33 a few short months ago! The thing is worth $14 today. Now they’re talking about laying people off, what incompetent management with complete disregard for employees & shareholder value! The same people would have jobs if MSFT & YHOO joined forces…or they’be be guaranteed a very nice severance at the very least.
The idiots in Sunnyvale are as bright as the folks who rode the wave from 1997-2000 only to take the elevator right back down through 2002.
Reply if you have a rebuttal…so far nothing from anyone defending managements complete destruction of value.
Maybe you people believe this bullshit they paraded around - http://www.slideshare.net/redu…..on-329594/
Just wait until earnings 10/21
PS: Sun Micro, now that’s a train wreck.
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/ta?.....amp;c=yhoo
oh please Mike. This is the most irresponsible post without any ground work. Look at P/Es of similar companies.GOOG jumped from 600’s to mid-300’s while YHOO went down from 30’s to 15. Don’t tell $13 looked too small for you. It is all market cap at the end. I still can’t believe this came from Mike considering his usually good analysis on the subjects.
That’s a simpleton’s view of the situation:
You’re completely ignoring the fact Yahoo could have cashed in their chips at $33 a few short months ago! The thing is worth $14 today. Now they’re talking about laying people off, what incompetent management with complete disregard for employees & shareholder value! The same people would have jobs if MSFT & YHOO joined forces…or they’be be guaranteed a very nice severance at the very least.
The idiots in Sunnyvale are as bright as the folks who rode the wave from 1997-2000 only to take the elevator right back down through 2002.
Reply if you have a rebuttal…so far nothing from anyone defending managements complete destruction of value.
Maybe you people believe this bullshit they paraded around - http://www.slideshare.net/redu.....on-329594/
Just wait until earnings 10/21
I love you guys quoting the US Comscore figures to justify Y!’s continued existence. Outside the US 9apart from a few pockets in Asia) it is Sh*t.
Look at the Comscore figures for Germany where it is struggling to break #5.
Back in the late nineties, the US *was* the internet audience. I can’t remember which film this (paraphrased) line came from but it was apt back then: “of course the internet is American, that’s why it’s called AMERICA On LIne”.
10 years on, the US is a much smaller part of that audience, so beware the quoting of US Comscore as the holy grail…..
Hey Mike,
I’m guessing you have less than full confidence in this plan
We’d love to get your thoughts.
http://www.slideshare.net/redu.....on-329594/
Google will step in at some point…
Zee, Michael –
That’s a simpleton’s view of the situation:
You’re completely ignoring the fact that Apple and Google also lost 50% of their value within the last year. Clearly there will be a series of posts as insightful as this one about how Eric, Sergey, Larry, and Steve have *all* got to go! Those idiots!!
Not to say there are not real challenges to weather… Only pointing out the imbalance in fury. Anyhow, looking forward to more hard-hitting journalism from the blog set… Go web2.0!
Mike,
Your continuing attempts to destroy Yahoo are transparent and really pretty pathetic. You are not fooling anybody. What are you, shorting the stock or something? Either way, for your own sake and limited credibility, you should give it a rest.
Sorry Harry,
Jerry & Sue beat Michael to it.
Ditto –Mike is really too blind and stupid to “give it a rest” –Sadly, he will not… Plus, he is totally oblivious to the fact that ‘what goes around, comes around, eventually’ More so in the Valley.
Let’s see if TC survives the turmoil. Thanks to Mike, TC is like a run away tiny train driven by a retarded monkey –it is just one of hundreds of blogs.
The only thing that will save the economy now is your social security money. Privatizing social security would provide plenty of money to bail out Wall Street. Republicans have always been big supporters of privatizing social security so remember that on election day. I think you could also be paying more taxes than you do. Come on! You can afford to pay a bit more in taxes. [This is sarcasm].
Yeah. Social Security [no such a thing] is just a fund full of IOUs –The F****g liberal-Democratic Congress has eviscerated it in the past few years…