<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: eBay Won&#8217;t Take Less Than $75 Million For StumbleUpon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/10/03/ebay-wont-take-less-than-75-million-for-stumbleupon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/10/03/ebay-wont-take-less-than-75-million-for-stumbleupon/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 06:36:04 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reasons Why StumbleUpon Merged With Digg Makes Sense &#124; Profy &#124; Internet news and commentary</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/10/03/ebay-wont-take-less-than-75-million-for-stumbleupon/comment-page-2/#comment-2664067</link>
		<dc:creator>Reasons Why StumbleUpon Merged With Digg Makes Sense &#124; Profy &#124; Internet news and commentary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 07:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22957#comment-2664067</guid>
		<description>[...] a potential buyer for StumbleUpon (acquired for $75 million in May 2007) to sell this property for at least the amount it initially paid for it. Of course the blogosphere is actively engaged in various conversation of who could be the right [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a potential buyer for StumbleUpon (acquired for $75 million in May 2007) to sell this property for at least the amount it initially paid for it. Of course the blogosphere is actively engaged in various conversation of who could be the right [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tinyComb &#187; Blog Archive &#187; eBay Can&#8217;t Find A Buyer For StumbleUpon, Here&#8217;s Why Barry Diller Should Buy It&#8230;. &#124; tinyCrunch</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/10/03/ebay-wont-take-less-than-75-million-for-stumbleupon/comment-page-2/#comment-2548376</link>
		<dc:creator>tinyComb &#187; Blog Archive &#187; eBay Can&#8217;t Find A Buyer For StumbleUpon, Here&#8217;s Why Barry Diller Should Buy It&#8230;. &#124; tinyCrunch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 19:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22957#comment-2548376</guid>
		<description>[...] TC    View jason&#039;s Profile &#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;  Subscribe via RSS    RelatedBookmarksTags      iPhone China... The jailbroken iPhone has been spotted all over China, but will they actually ink a deal with China Mobile for the 3G? Does this so...   Comcast, Run By Socialists?... Comcast made its final decision to punish heavy downloaders by capping their broadband usage at 250GB. This in an effort to save br...   Direct Line Gets You To An Operator... Direct Line is a new iPhone app that maps corporate phone trees to get you straight to the operator No more need to punch in all th...          Digg it  Stumble   del.icio.us  reddit  Yahoo  Google       tinyCrunch [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TC    View jason&#8217;s Profile &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;  Subscribe via RSS    RelatedBookmarksTags      iPhone China&#8230; The jailbroken iPhone has been spotted all over China, but will they actually ink a deal with China Mobile for the 3G? Does this so&#8230;   Comcast, Run By Socialists?&#8230; Comcast made its final decision to punish heavy downloaders by capping their broadband usage at 250GB. This in an effort to save br&#8230;   Direct Line Gets You To An Operator&#8230; Direct Line is a new iPhone app that maps corporate phone trees to get you straight to the operator No more need to punch in all th&#8230;          Digg it  Stumble   del.icio.us  reddit  Yahoo  Google       tinyCrunch [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It&#8217;s Time for a Viable Business Model &#124; LucaFiligheddu.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/10/03/ebay-wont-take-less-than-75-million-for-stumbleupon/comment-page-2/#comment-2501217</link>
		<dc:creator>It&#8217;s Time for a Viable Business Model &#124; LucaFiligheddu.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 08:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22957#comment-2501217</guid>
		<description>[...] of eBay and the Skype / Stumbleupon deals, for instance, companies which are both likely to be sold again. Those times are just memories, acquisitions are nowadays more focused for big names like eBay [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of eBay and the Skype / Stumbleupon deals, for instance, companies which are both likely to be sold again. Those times are just memories, acquisitions are nowadays more focused for big names like eBay [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Credit crunch to be the death of Web 2.0? &#124; Thomas De Maesschalck's blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/10/03/ebay-wont-take-less-than-75-million-for-stumbleupon/comment-page-1/#comment-2499699</link>
		<dc:creator>Credit crunch to be the death of Web 2.0? &#124; Thomas De Maesschalck's blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 00:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22957#comment-2499699</guid>
		<description>[...] same is true for StumbleUpon, eBay put them for sale this month because the services&#8217; popularity is fading and they don&#8217;t know what to do [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] same is true for StumbleUpon, eBay put them for sale this month because the services&#8217; popularity is fading and they don&#8217;t know what to do [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Credit crunch to be the death of Web 2.0? &#124; Thomas De Maesschalck's blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/10/03/ebay-wont-take-less-than-75-million-for-stumbleupon/comment-page-1/#comment-2499698</link>
		<dc:creator>Credit crunch to be the death of Web 2.0? &#124; Thomas De Maesschalck's blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 00:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22957#comment-2499698</guid>
		<description>[...] same is true for StumbleUpon, eBay put them for sale this month because the services&#8217; popularity is fading and they don&#8217;t know what to do [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] same is true for StumbleUpon, eBay put them for sale this month because the services&#8217; popularity is fading and they don&#8217;t know what to do [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Digg Should Buy StumbleUpon - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/10/03/ebay-wont-take-less-than-75-million-for-stumbleupon/comment-page-1/#comment-2494230</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Digg Should Buy StumbleUpon - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 21:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22957#comment-2494230</guid>
		<description>[...] citing an unnamed source &#8220;with knowledge of the sale process,&#8221; noted late last week, eBay isn&#8217;t willing to lose money on its purchase of the toolbar maker that enables the collaborative discovery and recommendation of web [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] citing an unnamed source &#8220;with knowledge of the sale process,&#8221; noted late last week, eBay isn&#8217;t willing to lose money on its purchase of the toolbar maker that enables the collaborative discovery and recommendation of web [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annoyed</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/10/03/ebay-wont-take-less-than-75-million-for-stumbleupon/comment-page-1/#comment-2493144</link>
		<dc:creator>Annoyed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 18:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22957#comment-2493144</guid>
		<description>David Mullings - October 6th, 2008 at 9:12 am PDT

&lt;i&gt;Yes more stumblers may be using add-ons that prevent the ads to work but I only pay for the ones that work and there are always people who don’t use add-ons. 

If SU can grow its base faster than the people take to the add-on then it will still have a large user base ready for advertising.&lt;/i&gt;

You&#039;d be surprised how many people have started putting on the add ons.
When you&#039;ve got &quot;Super Users&quot; with a large fan base you&#039;re going to see a reduction of revenue.  All it takes is a little organization on the parts of the users and you&#039;ll see hardly any income from your SU pages.

You realize, of course, that there are forums for just this purpose.
Don&#039;t be surprised if you see a &quot;call to action&quot; on it in coming months.


&lt;i&gt;Also, my comment clearly indicated that “Unfortunately, the SU users don’t come back, but I feel that is more a flaw in our venture than SU.”

Content alone does not determine return visits. Presentation of content, ease of finding content, frequency of updates AND targeting the right audience all play a role.

Target too wide an audience and naturally only some will return. SU could add even more targeting options. &lt;/i&gt;

I know that you stated that it was a flaw in your &quot;venture&quot;, I can read for content.
I was reinforcing the point that content is important.

Also, I don&#039;t know why you don&#039;t think that return visits are based on content.
I can assure you that I will not revisit a site that offers fluff, stolen content, poorly written trite...etc. I can also assure you there is a rapidly growing number of users who feel the same.

Say you&#039;re at a get together and are sitting in a circle.
One person reaches down and picks up their fancy looking handbag, which is full of manure.
They pass it around the circle and all the way back to the originator.
Then he tries to pass it around again, but this time... no one will take it.
Why?
Because even though the handbag was nice to look at, it was filled with stinky crap. You can dress it up, but it&#039;s still going to stink.

P.S.
Nobody wants to be subjected to stinky crap.
Put that in your &quot;venture&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Mullings &#8211; October 6th, 2008 at 9:12 am PDT</p>
<p><i>Yes more stumblers may be using add-ons that prevent the ads to work but I only pay for the ones that work and there are always people who don’t use add-ons. </p>
<p>If SU can grow its base faster than the people take to the add-on then it will still have a large user base ready for advertising.</i></p>
<p>You&#8217;d be surprised how many people have started putting on the add ons.<br />
When you&#8217;ve got &#8220;Super Users&#8221; with a large fan base you&#8217;re going to see a reduction of revenue.  All it takes is a little organization on the parts of the users and you&#8217;ll see hardly any income from your SU pages.</p>
<p>You realize, of course, that there are forums for just this purpose.<br />
Don&#8217;t be surprised if you see a &#8220;call to action&#8221; on it in coming months.</p>
<p><i>Also, my comment clearly indicated that “Unfortunately, the SU users don’t come back, but I feel that is more a flaw in our venture than SU.”</p>
<p>Content alone does not determine return visits. Presentation of content, ease of finding content, frequency of updates AND targeting the right audience all play a role.</p>
<p>Target too wide an audience and naturally only some will return. SU could add even more targeting options. </i></p>
<p>I know that you stated that it was a flaw in your &#8220;venture&#8221;, I can read for content.<br />
I was reinforcing the point that content is important.</p>
<p>Also, I don&#8217;t know why you don&#8217;t think that return visits are based on content.<br />
I can assure you that I will not revisit a site that offers fluff, stolen content, poorly written trite&#8230;etc. I can also assure you there is a rapidly growing number of users who feel the same.</p>
<p>Say you&#8217;re at a get together and are sitting in a circle.<br />
One person reaches down and picks up their fancy looking handbag, which is full of manure.<br />
They pass it around the circle and all the way back to the originator.<br />
Then he tries to pass it around again, but this time&#8230; no one will take it.<br />
Why?<br />
Because even though the handbag was nice to look at, it was filled with stinky crap. You can dress it up, but it&#8217;s still going to stink.</p>
<p>P.S.<br />
Nobody wants to be subjected to stinky crap.<br />
Put that in your &#8220;venture&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Mullings</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/10/03/ebay-wont-take-less-than-75-million-for-stumbleupon/comment-page-1/#comment-2493000</link>
		<dc:creator>David Mullings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 16:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22957#comment-2493000</guid>
		<description>Yes more stumblers may be using add-ons that prevent the ads to work but I only pay for the ones that work and there are always people who don&#039;t use add-ons.

If SU can grow its base faster than the people take to the add-on then it will still have a large user base ready for advertising.

Also, my comment clearly indicated that &quot;Unfortunately, the SU users don’t come back, but I feel that is more a flaw in our venture than SU.&quot;

Content alone does not determine return visits. Presentation of content, ease of finding content, frequency of updates AND targeting the right audience all play a role.

Target too wide an audience and naturally only some will return. SU could add even more targeting options.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes more stumblers may be using add-ons that prevent the ads to work but I only pay for the ones that work and there are always people who don&#8217;t use add-ons.</p>
<p>If SU can grow its base faster than the people take to the add-on then it will still have a large user base ready for advertising.</p>
<p>Also, my comment clearly indicated that &#8220;Unfortunately, the SU users don’t come back, but I feel that is more a flaw in our venture than SU.&#8221;</p>
<p>Content alone does not determine return visits. Presentation of content, ease of finding content, frequency of updates AND targeting the right audience all play a role.</p>
<p>Target too wide an audience and naturally only some will return. SU could add even more targeting options.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annoyed</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/10/03/ebay-wont-take-less-than-75-million-for-stumbleupon/comment-page-1/#comment-2492861</link>
		<dc:creator>Annoyed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 14:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22957#comment-2492861</guid>
		<description>SU -was- great until eBay took it over.
Then it started a downward spiral and it just keeps going down.
The only annoying process is that all the jackals have moved in and have mucked the place up by crapping all over where people come to enjoy themselves.

Also, the whole &quot;no toolbar&quot; thing... it&#039;s going to be the end of SU.
I&#039;ve seen postings on sites like Mixx and other spammer hangouts that have already started their rollouts on saturating Stumble with their sub par content and copypasta.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SU -was- great until eBay took it over.<br />
Then it started a downward spiral and it just keeps going down.<br />
The only annoying process is that all the jackals have moved in and have mucked the place up by crapping all over where people come to enjoy themselves.</p>
<p>Also, the whole &#8220;no toolbar&#8221; thing&#8230; it&#8217;s going to be the end of SU.<br />
I&#8217;ve seen postings on sites like Mixx and other spammer hangouts that have already started their rollouts on saturating Stumble with their sub par content and copypasta.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annoyed</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/10/03/ebay-wont-take-less-than-75-million-for-stumbleupon/comment-page-1/#comment-2492856</link>
		<dc:creator>Annoyed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 14:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22957#comment-2492856</guid>
		<description>You can say that again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can say that again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annoyed</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/10/03/ebay-wont-take-less-than-75-million-for-stumbleupon/comment-page-1/#comment-2492853</link>
		<dc:creator>Annoyed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 14:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22957#comment-2492853</guid>
		<description>It was more social and fun prior to the sale to eBay.
The content was better.
The people were better.
You didn&#039;t have spammers, marketers or self promoting bloggers every where you turned.
I&#039;ve been on SU for a long, long time and it&#039;s degraded so much.
It&#039;s now a place for thieves, scam artists and pyramid schemes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was more social and fun prior to the sale to eBay.<br />
The content was better.<br />
The people were better.<br />
You didn&#8217;t have spammers, marketers or self promoting bloggers every where you turned.<br />
I&#8217;ve been on SU for a long, long time and it&#8217;s degraded so much.<br />
It&#8217;s now a place for thieves, scam artists and pyramid schemes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lyal Avery</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/10/03/ebay-wont-take-less-than-75-million-for-stumbleupon/comment-page-1/#comment-2492849</link>
		<dc:creator>Lyal Avery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 14:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22957#comment-2492849</guid>
		<description>StumbleUpon could have been great, had eBay marketed it properly.  A channel experience for less technically inclined users - instead, they left it as a neutered social bookmarking site with an incredibly annoying process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>StumbleUpon could have been great, had eBay marketed it properly.  A channel experience for less technically inclined users &#8211; instead, they left it as a neutered social bookmarking site with an incredibly annoying process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annoyed</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/10/03/ebay-wont-take-less-than-75-million-for-stumbleupon/comment-page-1/#comment-2492848</link>
		<dc:creator>Annoyed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 14:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22957#comment-2492848</guid>
		<description>But keep in mind that more and more Stumblers are using addons that won&#039;t allow your ads to work. I personally use 5 such add ons and urge my rather large fanbase to follow suit. Which, they in turn tell to their fanbases.

Quite honestly, stumblers don&#039;t like to be directed to sites that are on SU simply to drive traffic. They &quot;thumb&quot; things down and it gets drowned in the rest of the sea of crappy content that is plaguing Stumble, right where it belongs. We also flag these people as spammers and report them.

People who complain about not getting repeat traffic are the ones who don&#039;t have anything worth reading.  Crappy content = crappy traffic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But keep in mind that more and more Stumblers are using addons that won&#8217;t allow your ads to work. I personally use 5 such add ons and urge my rather large fanbase to follow suit. Which, they in turn tell to their fanbases.</p>
<p>Quite honestly, stumblers don&#8217;t like to be directed to sites that are on SU simply to drive traffic. They &#8220;thumb&#8221; things down and it gets drowned in the rest of the sea of crappy content that is plaguing Stumble, right where it belongs. We also flag these people as spammers and report them.</p>
<p>People who complain about not getting repeat traffic are the ones who don&#8217;t have anything worth reading.  Crappy content = crappy traffic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freddie</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/10/03/ebay-wont-take-less-than-75-million-for-stumbleupon/comment-page-1/#comment-2492840</link>
		<dc:creator>Freddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 13:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22957#comment-2492840</guid>
		<description>What is the development in revenue last years? what would be revenue in 2012? Isn&#039;t this like Netscpape, an inventor loosing there position and never recover?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the development in revenue last years? what would be revenue in 2012? Isn&#8217;t this like Netscpape, an inventor loosing there position and never recover?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annoyed</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/10/03/ebay-wont-take-less-than-75-million-for-stumbleupon/comment-page-1/#comment-2492837</link>
		<dc:creator>Annoyed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 13:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22957#comment-2492837</guid>
		<description>And it&#039;s people like you that are ruining the experience for all the non SEO/Marketers/bottom feeders on SU.

StumbleUpon was a nice place to waste down time, get some -quality- pages and enjoy themselves. Now?  Every other page is a copypasta blog with completely stolen content self submitted by the site&#039;s owner.
Spam rings and stumble exchange rings run rampant.

Now?
SU has become an SEO haven.
A spammer free for all.
An avalanche of marketing and self promotion.
It&#039;s become a cesspool.

I&#039;ve been on SU since the beginning and as soon as I find - or have someone code - something that&#039;s similar to SU, I&#039;m leaving.
And I&#039;ll be sure to take take as many of my my 5000+ fans with me as I can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And it&#8217;s people like you that are ruining the experience for all the non SEO/Marketers/bottom feeders on SU.</p>
<p>StumbleUpon was a nice place to waste down time, get some -quality- pages and enjoy themselves. Now?  Every other page is a copypasta blog with completely stolen content self submitted by the site&#8217;s owner.<br />
Spam rings and stumble exchange rings run rampant.</p>
<p>Now?<br />
SU has become an SEO haven.<br />
A spammer free for all.<br />
An avalanche of marketing and self promotion.<br />
It&#8217;s become a cesspool.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been on SU since the beginning and as soon as I find &#8211; or have someone code &#8211; something that&#8217;s similar to SU, I&#8217;m leaving.<br />
And I&#8217;ll be sure to take take as many of my my 5000+ fans with me as I can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eBay Acquires Bill Me Later to Merge with PayPal &#124; Profy &#124; Internet news and commentary</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/10/03/ebay-wont-take-less-than-75-million-for-stumbleupon/comment-page-1/#comment-2492784</link>
		<dc:creator>eBay Acquires Bill Me Later to Merge with PayPal &#124; Profy &#124; Internet news and commentary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 12:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22957#comment-2492784</guid>
		<description>[...] when the blogosphere is heavily engaged in discussing rumors of eBay trying to sell StumbleUpon and even suggesting Skype may be the next [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] when the blogosphere is heavily engaged in discussing rumors of eBay trying to sell StumbleUpon and even suggesting Skype may be the next [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob, BtG</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/10/03/ebay-wont-take-less-than-75-million-for-stumbleupon/comment-page-1/#comment-2492368</link>
		<dc:creator>rob, BtG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 00:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22957#comment-2492368</guid>
		<description>other stumbleupon news-http://www.blogtogreat.com/2008/10/stumbleupon-to.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>other stumbleupon news-http://www.blogtogreat.com/2008/10/stumbleupon-to.html</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fordian You</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/10/03/ebay-wont-take-less-than-75-million-for-stumbleupon/comment-page-1/#comment-2492283</link>
		<dc:creator>Fordian You</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 20:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22957#comment-2492283</guid>
		<description>&quot;Not less than $75 million,&quot; huh?  I got three words for you, eBay:

RESERVE NOT MET.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Not less than $75 million,&#8221; huh?  I got three words for you, eBay:</p>
<p>RESERVE NOT MET.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taste Kid&#8217;s Journey &#187; StumbleUpon for Sale, but Why?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/10/03/ebay-wont-take-less-than-75-million-for-stumbleupon/comment-page-1/#comment-2492055</link>
		<dc:creator>Taste Kid&#8217;s Journey &#187; StumbleUpon for Sale, but Why?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 13:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22957#comment-2492055</guid>
		<description>[...] $75 million in May 2007, it seems eBay is now trying to sell the popular content discovery service. The rumours are they have difficulties in finding a buyer willing to pay at least the acquisition price, the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] $75 million in May 2007, it seems eBay is now trying to sell the popular content discovery service. The rumours are they have difficulties in finding a buyer willing to pay at least the acquisition price, the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dwayne</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/10/03/ebay-wont-take-less-than-75-million-for-stumbleupon/comment-page-1/#comment-2491868</link>
		<dc:creator>Dwayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 05:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22957#comment-2491868</guid>
		<description>Stumbleupon is heavily undermarketed and hard to monetise. Unless they implement a way to monetise it, besides the web toolbar, they&#039;ve got the traffic but no drive.

Looks like eBay fails again with another investment..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stumbleupon is heavily undermarketed and hard to monetise. Unless they implement a way to monetise it, besides the web toolbar, they&#8217;ve got the traffic but no drive.</p>
<p>Looks like eBay fails again with another investment..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goorsha</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/10/03/ebay-wont-take-less-than-75-million-for-stumbleupon/comment-page-1/#comment-2491812</link>
		<dc:creator>Goorsha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 03:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22957#comment-2491812</guid>
		<description>Revenue is 6 Million. 

Hence, 5 X Revenue = 30 Million. 

So, this is how much it is worth!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Revenue is 6 Million. </p>
<p>Hence, 5 X Revenue = 30 Million. </p>
<p>So, this is how much it is worth!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goorsha</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/10/03/ebay-wont-take-less-than-75-million-for-stumbleupon/comment-page-1/#comment-2491811</link>
		<dc:creator>Goorsha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 03:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22957#comment-2491811</guid>
		<description>Revenue is 6 Million. 

Hence, 5Xrevenue= 30 Million. This is how much it os worth!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Revenue is 6 Million. </p>
<p>Hence, 5Xrevenue= 30 Million. This is how much it os worth!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Beville</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/10/03/ebay-wont-take-less-than-75-million-for-stumbleupon/comment-page-1/#comment-2491749</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Beville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 01:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22957#comment-2491749</guid>
		<description>StumbleUpon is mostly a waste of time and a confusing model for social web.  It was fun around 2003.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>StumbleUpon is mostly a waste of time and a confusing model for social web.  It was fun around 2003.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John C. McClore</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/10/03/ebay-wont-take-less-than-75-million-for-stumbleupon/comment-page-1/#comment-2491705</link>
		<dc:creator>John C. McClore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 23:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22957#comment-2491705</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll buy it.  For one dollar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll buy it.  For one dollar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buzzdup.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/10/03/ebay-wont-take-less-than-75-million-for-stumbleupon/comment-page-1/#comment-2491697</link>
		<dc:creator>buzzdup.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 22:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22957#comment-2491697</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;eBay Won’t Take Less Than $75 Million For StumbleUpon...&lt;/strong&gt;

Deutsche Bank is still out there trying to find a buyer for eBay’s StumbleUpon business, we’ve heard from new sources (we first reported on this on September 18). But there’s one problem: while eBay wants to unload the business, they aren’t wil...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>eBay Won’t Take Less Than $75 Million For StumbleUpon&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Deutsche Bank is still out there trying to find a buyer for eBay’s StumbleUpon business, we’ve heard from new sources (we first reported on this on September 18). But there’s one problem: while eBay wants to unload the business, they aren’t wil&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
