<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cloud + Client</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/29/cloud-client/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/29/cloud-client/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:28:33 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: hmlwh's me2DAY</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/29/cloud-client/comment-page-1/#comment-2487543</link>
		<dc:creator>hmlwh's me2DAY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 22:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22770#comment-2487543</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;LeeWonHee의 생각...&lt;/strong&gt;

클라우드 컴퓨팅과 그리드 컴퓨팅의 차이는 개념과 기술의 차이다. 개념은 기술이 아니다. 기술을 통해 구현될 뿐이다....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>LeeWonHee의 생각&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>클라우드 컴퓨팅과 그리드 컴퓨팅의 차이는 개념과 기술의 차이다. 개념은 기술이 아니다. 기술을 통해 구현될 뿐이다&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/29/cloud-client/comment-page-1/#comment-2487508</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 22:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22770#comment-2487508</guid>
		<description>Steve, I have not been able to understood your points in previous articles.  I enjoyed this article.  I hope the clarification of your writing continues.

&quot;What a Joke&quot;: from my view, the market has been (accurately) reducing growth expectations.  I have never owned Microsoft stock before, but recently purchased some.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, I have not been able to understood your points in previous articles.  I enjoyed this article.  I hope the clarification of your writing continues.</p>
<p>&#8220;What a Joke&#8221;: from my view, the market has been (accurately) reducing growth expectations.  I have never owned Microsoft stock before, but recently purchased some.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: henry miller</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/29/cloud-client/comment-page-1/#comment-2487273</link>
		<dc:creator>henry miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 19:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22770#comment-2487273</guid>
		<description>yes, what is with that line :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, what is with that line <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What a Joke</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/29/cloud-client/comment-page-1/#comment-2487162</link>
		<dc:creator>What a Joke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 17:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22770#comment-2487162</guid>
		<description>If Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer are so smart and such deep thinkers, why has their stock price been stuck at $25 for five years - despite spending billons on stock buybacks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer are so smart and such deep thinkers, why has their stock price been stuck at $25 for five years &#8211; despite spending billons on stock buybacks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anand</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/29/cloud-client/comment-page-1/#comment-2487025</link>
		<dc:creator>Anand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 15:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22770#comment-2487025</guid>
		<description>If you are interested in knowing what does Oracle&#039;s partnership with Amazon mean to enterprise computing ? Check out the  article that I wrote here: http://tinyurl.com/3k3uwh

Thanks,
Anand
www.byteonic.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are interested in knowing what does Oracle&#8217;s partnership with Amazon mean to enterprise computing ? Check out the  article that I wrote here: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/3k3uwh" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://tinyurl.com/3k3uwh'>http://tinyurl.com/3k3uwh</a></p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Anand<br />
<a href="http://www.byteonic.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.byteonic.com'>http://www.byteonic.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: is gates that smart?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/29/cloud-client/comment-page-1/#comment-2486847</link>
		<dc:creator>is gates that smart?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 11:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22770#comment-2486847</guid>
		<description>Good explanation of your previous posts on mesh. I agree that MS are really onto something here, and having your context follow you across platforms opens vast areas for new stuff.
Anyone who the support of a $9B R&amp;D department should appear to be a near genius, and I find our crediting Bill Gates alone not credible. This is not sour grapes, MS have many brilliant people working there and they have created a structure that enables their ideas to become reality - full credit to them. I just do not see one person conceiving and planning something like mesh and all the various pieces that are still coming together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good explanation of your previous posts on mesh. I agree that MS are really onto something here, and having your context follow you across platforms opens vast areas for new stuff.<br />
Anyone who the support of a $9B R&amp;D department should appear to be a near genius, and I find our crediting Bill Gates alone not credible. This is not sour grapes, MS have many brilliant people working there and they have created a structure that enables their ideas to become reality &#8211; full credit to them. I just do not see one person conceiving and planning something like mesh and all the various pieces that are still coming together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yasser Masood</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/29/cloud-client/comment-page-1/#comment-2486687</link>
		<dc:creator>Yasser Masood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 07:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22770#comment-2486687</guid>
		<description>I love this line, &#039;It’s the calm of the lion, relaxing in the shade and watching the world, his world, lining up.&#039; - awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love this line, &#8216;It’s the calm of the lion, relaxing in the shade and watching the world, his world, lining up.&#8217; &#8211; awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: henry miller</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/29/cloud-client/comment-page-1/#comment-2486373</link>
		<dc:creator>henry miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 00:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22770#comment-2486373</guid>
		<description>From what I saw McCain did have some good points but radiated negativity. Whereas Obama radiated positivity Obama had 30 good insights for every one good point from his opponent. Obama just looked and acted professional, cool and presidential. McCains did the usual mud slinging and it did nothing but make Obama look mature. McCain hemmed and hawed on questions and Obama hit them square out of the park.

I would say no contest.

The same could be said for Google/Microsoft. When Microsoft/Ballmer stop with the negativity and focus on creativity. Stop with the idea of destroying MS&#039;s enemies which is such an old paradigm. George Bush is stuck there. War on drugs, war on terror, always out to get the evil doers. Leading by creating fear. If Bush had put the 2 trillion dollar surplus left by Clinton into developing technologies and inspiring people like Google is doing the US and the world would not be in the financial meltdown you see today. A different tack is needed by nations and companies.

I would like to see Microsoft change in one simple way. They want to take business from other companies. MS should start by adopting Google&#039;s strategy of being and doing as much good as possible.

Relationships are based on giving (not taking). MS is not evil but it would be great if they could focus more on giving, being constructive and creative like Google does.

Life is short why not focus on creating a better world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I saw McCain did have some good points but radiated negativity. Whereas Obama radiated positivity Obama had 30 good insights for every one good point from his opponent. Obama just looked and acted professional, cool and presidential. McCains did the usual mud slinging and it did nothing but make Obama look mature. McCain hemmed and hawed on questions and Obama hit them square out of the park.</p>
<p>I would say no contest.</p>
<p>The same could be said for Google/Microsoft. When Microsoft/Ballmer stop with the negativity and focus on creativity. Stop with the idea of destroying MS&#8217;s enemies which is such an old paradigm. George Bush is stuck there. War on drugs, war on terror, always out to get the evil doers. Leading by creating fear. If Bush had put the 2 trillion dollar surplus left by Clinton into developing technologies and inspiring people like Google is doing the US and the world would not be in the financial meltdown you see today. A different tack is needed by nations and companies.</p>
<p>I would like to see Microsoft change in one simple way. They want to take business from other companies. MS should start by adopting Google&#8217;s strategy of being and doing as much good as possible.</p>
<p>Relationships are based on giving (not taking). MS is not evil but it would be great if they could focus more on giving, being constructive and creative like Google does.</p>
<p>Life is short why not focus on creating a better world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/29/cloud-client/comment-page-1/#comment-2486315</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 23:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22770#comment-2486315</guid>
		<description>I watched the debate live and I thought it was a draw. You can put your own spin on technology, but suggest you leave politics out of it. It takes away from your argument.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watched the debate live and I thought it was a draw. You can put your own spin on technology, but suggest you leave politics out of it. It takes away from your argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chase Brammer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/29/cloud-client/comment-page-1/#comment-2486314</link>
		<dc:creator>Chase Brammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 23:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22770#comment-2486314</guid>
		<description>This is the most intelligent, well thought out, and &quot;edgy&quot; post I have read during the last 6 months on TC.  I am not a huge fan of MS, but it is refreshing to hear someone recognize that they are a powerhouse to compete with the likes of Google in delivery and innovation.  Great article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the most intelligent, well thought out, and &#8220;edgy&#8221; post I have read during the last 6 months on TC.  I am not a huge fan of MS, but it is refreshing to hear someone recognize that they are a powerhouse to compete with the likes of Google in delivery and innovation.  Great article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kika</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/29/cloud-client/comment-page-/#comment-2486287</link>
		<dc:creator>kika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 23:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22770#comment-2486287</guid>
		<description>In a nutshell, MS lost the SaS battle (or just consider it not worth to win) and wants to start a new one, on a new field.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a nutshell, MS lost the SaS battle (or just consider it not worth to win) and wants to start a new one, on a new field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kika</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/29/cloud-client/comment-page-1/#comment-2486284</link>
		<dc:creator>kika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 22:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22770#comment-2486284</guid>
		<description>Economy downturn offers small companies an advantage and technology downturn does it as well. Troubled water isn&#039;t always source of trouble. There&#039;re always guys who are going to catch some fish in there. And some of them will do. It&#039;s actually not so interesting to watch what MS will do, but to look at the smaller guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Economy downturn offers small companies an advantage and technology downturn does it as well. Troubled water isn&#8217;t always source of trouble. There&#8217;re always guys who are going to catch some fish in there. And some of them will do. It&#8217;s actually not so interesting to watch what MS will do, but to look at the smaller guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
