<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LongJump Challenges Force.com With New Developer Suite</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/22/longjump-challenges-forcecom-with-new-developer-suite/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/22/longjump-challenges-forcecom-with-new-developer-suite/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:08:32 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: online backup</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/22/longjump-challenges-forcecom-with-new-developer-suite/comment-page-1/#comment-2975316</link>
		<dc:creator>online backup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 06:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22508#comment-2975316</guid>
		<description>Oh!  That&#039;s Interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh!  That&#8217;s Interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: viefns omfxei</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/22/longjump-challenges-forcecom-with-new-developer-suite/comment-page-1/#comment-2502339</link>
		<dc:creator>viefns omfxei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 06:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22508#comment-2502339</guid>
		<description>ouaceivpg itzwaynq gnwsuvmk coev ixwdenmt qoaes itbm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ouaceivpg itzwaynq gnwsuvmk coev ixwdenmt qoaes itbm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Appleton</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/22/longjump-challenges-forcecom-with-new-developer-suite/comment-page-1/#comment-2480345</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Appleton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 20:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22508#comment-2480345</guid>
		<description>Yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sal Daoud</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/22/longjump-challenges-forcecom-with-new-developer-suite/comment-page-1/#comment-2478285</link>
		<dc:creator>Sal Daoud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 06:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22508#comment-2478285</guid>
		<description>@TechCrunch  Michael, Intuit, Inc. also has a PaaS solution.  I wonder if you have looked into it before writing this article and if so, what are the reasons for not listing it?

http://tinyurl.com/5yk5rf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@TechCrunch  Michael, Intuit, Inc. also has a PaaS solution.  I wonder if you have looked into it before writing this article and if so, what are the reasons for not listing it?</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/5yk5rf" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://tinyurl.com/5yk5rf'>http://tinyurl.com/5yk5rf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cloud Feed &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Daily Cloud Feed - Sep 22, 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/22/longjump-challenges-forcecom-with-new-developer-suite/comment-page-1/#comment-2478051</link>
		<dc:creator>Cloud Feed &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Daily Cloud Feed - Sep 22, 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 23:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22508#comment-2478051</guid>
		<description>[...] LongJump Challenges Force.com With New Developer Suite [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] LongJump Challenges Force.com With New Developer Suite [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Developer Suite in The News</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/22/longjump-challenges-forcecom-with-new-developer-suite/comment-page-1/#comment-2477999</link>
		<dc:creator>Developer Suite in The News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 22:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22508#comment-2477999</guid>
		<description>[...] Mark Hendrickson from Techcrunch observes in &#8220;LongJump Challenges Force.com with New Developer Suite&#8221; : &#8220;LongJump will provide a sandbox area for developers to test their Java applications before [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mark Hendrickson from Techcrunch observes in &#8220;LongJump Challenges Force.com with New Developer Suite&#8221; : &#8220;LongJump will provide a sandbox area for developers to test their Java applications before [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Guerra</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/22/longjump-challenges-forcecom-with-new-developer-suite/comment-page-1/#comment-2477720</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Guerra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 18:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22508#comment-2477720</guid>
		<description>@Bill Appleton says &quot;... With salesforce you can only create applications that exist inside their CRM product...&quot;. Is this true?, if I built something with Force.com only salesforce.com users will be able to use my app?.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bill Appleton says &#8220;&#8230; With salesforce you can only create applications that exist inside their CRM product&#8230;&#8221;. Is this true?, if I built something with Force.com only salesforce.com users will be able to use my app?.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Appleton</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/22/longjump-challenges-forcecom-with-new-developer-suite/comment-page-1/#comment-2477575</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Appleton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 17:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22508#comment-2477575</guid>
		<description>With salesforce you can only create applications that exist inside their CRM product. Force.com isn&#039;t a competitor to Longjump, AWS, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With salesforce you can only create applications that exist inside their CRM product. Force.com isn&#8217;t a competitor to Longjump, AWS, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grego</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/22/longjump-challenges-forcecom-with-new-developer-suite/comment-page-1/#comment-2477549</link>
		<dc:creator>grego</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 16:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22508#comment-2477549</guid>
		<description>Rato,

Yes, Coghead PaaS does support SaaS.  As a Coghead solution provider you could be a multi-tenant SaaS provider to millions of end-users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rato,</p>
<p>Yes, Coghead PaaS does support SaaS.  As a Coghead solution provider you could be a multi-tenant SaaS provider to millions of end-users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harrah's Laughlin</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/22/longjump-challenges-forcecom-with-new-developer-suite/comment-page-1/#comment-2477519</link>
		<dc:creator>Harrah's Laughlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 16:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22508#comment-2477519</guid>
		<description>interesting tool</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting tool</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Wilensky</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/22/longjump-challenges-forcecom-with-new-developer-suite/comment-page-1/#comment-2477343</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Wilensky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 13:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22508#comment-2477343</guid>
		<description>Can we please keep Scoble out of here? We don&#039;t know who is paying him to say what.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can we please keep Scoble out of here? We don&#8217;t know who is paying him to say what.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rato</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/22/longjump-challenges-forcecom-with-new-developer-suite/comment-page-1/#comment-2477316</link>
		<dc:creator>Rato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 13:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22508#comment-2477316</guid>
		<description>Pls, could anyone explain to me if Paas supports Saas approach, in other words, building an app on top of Force, Longjump or Coghead, would I be able to support a multi-tenant arquitecture, providing service to thousands or millions of end-users?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pls, could anyone explain to me if Paas supports Saas approach, in other words, building an app on top of Force, Longjump or Coghead, would I be able to support a multi-tenant arquitecture, providing service to thousands or millions of end-users?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: www.ShawnDrewry.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/22/longjump-challenges-forcecom-with-new-developer-suite/comment-page-1/#comment-2477258</link>
		<dc:creator>www.ShawnDrewry.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 11:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22508#comment-2477258</guid>
		<description>SalesForce needs to tighten up their game on the &quot;WANTED Analytics&quot; window loading so slow and do a better job pre-populating their phone number, e-mail address and other contact information fields a little more on the &quot;lead&quot; page (The orange page). I find that I have to do more searching in Google to find companies phone numbers and website addresses when I am using SalesForce, which is a pain in the @$$, cause when I go thru the leads, I automatically thought that all of them would already have all the contact info provided either by the SalesForce bot or Wanted analytics crawler, when they crawl across the web...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SalesForce needs to tighten up their game on the &#8220;WANTED Analytics&#8221; window loading so slow and do a better job pre-populating their phone number, e-mail address and other contact information fields a little more on the &#8220;lead&#8221; page (The orange page). I find that I have to do more searching in Google to find companies phone numbers and website addresses when I am using SalesForce, which is a pain in the @$$, cause when I go thru the leads, I automatically thought that all of them would already have all the contact info provided either by the SalesForce bot or Wanted analytics crawler, when they crawl across the web&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/22/longjump-challenges-forcecom-with-new-developer-suite/comment-page-1/#comment-2477240</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 11:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22508#comment-2477240</guid>
		<description>Yes, if your customers are Salesforce.com users. But let’s not forget it’s a limitation as well, taking into account force.com users don’t cover the whole audience out there. And LongJump is developed for programmer utilization. 
I would consider of more challenge here such vendors like Coghead or TeamDesk.net, not LongJump, as long as they provide solutions for non-techie users, thus being more in demand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, if your customers are Salesforce.com users. But let’s not forget it’s a limitation as well, taking into account force.com users don’t cover the whole audience out there. And LongJump is developed for programmer utilization.<br />
I would consider of more challenge here such vendors like Coghead or TeamDesk.net, not LongJump, as long as they provide solutions for non-techie users, thus being more in demand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Apps Consulting</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/22/longjump-challenges-forcecom-with-new-developer-suite/comment-page-1/#comment-2477229</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Apps Consulting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 10:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22508#comment-2477229</guid>
		<description>From your post, LongJump seems quite promising.  Its new feature, Eclipse IDE, is really a great feature. But I agree with your concluding statement that we have to give some time to it to see whether it will be able to create an impact or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From your post, LongJump seems quite promising.  Its new feature, Eclipse IDE, is really a great feature. But I agree with your concluding statement that we have to give some time to it to see whether it will be able to create an impact or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doron Gordon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/22/longjump-challenges-forcecom-with-new-developer-suite/comment-page-1/#comment-2477146</link>
		<dc:creator>Doron Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 08:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22508#comment-2477146</guid>
		<description>We played around with the offerings from bungee and LongJump before deciding to stick with the force. I think both offerings are innovative and provides great tools to develop PaaS apps (and gives you lots more flexibility then force), but IMO one of the less talked about issues for PaaS developers is not the ease of development rather its the ease of the go-to market - in order words, how the PaaS vendor can support your marketing, credibility and provides a brand that you can leverage. At the end of the day, when you tell your customers and partners that your app is built and hosted @ force.com, they know who is behind it and what level of SLA they can deliver. 

Doron</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We played around with the offerings from bungee and LongJump before deciding to stick with the force. I think both offerings are innovative and provides great tools to develop PaaS apps (and gives you lots more flexibility then force), but IMO one of the less talked about issues for PaaS developers is not the ease of development rather its the ease of the go-to market &#8211; in order words, how the PaaS vendor can support your marketing, credibility and provides a brand that you can leverage. At the end of the day, when you tell your customers and partners that your app is built and hosted @ force.com, they know who is behind it and what level of SLA they can deliver. </p>
<p>Doron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/22/longjump-challenges-forcecom-with-new-developer-suite/comment-page-1/#comment-2477128</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 07:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22508#comment-2477128</guid>
		<description>I had a chance to check out Bungee at the Web 2.0 Expo and thought it looked very useful.  I&#039;m not sure how the market is divided by all the PaaS providers, but Bungee certainly seemed good for the recreational and professional markets.  Knowing SalesForce/Force.com, they&#039;d still be going after the SMB and enterprise markets.  So, I think there&#039;s room for some of the players out there.  Overall, I think the PaaS industry will become very interesting in a year.  

JP
http://www.convos.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a chance to check out Bungee at the Web 2.0 Expo and thought it looked very useful.  I&#8217;m not sure how the market is divided by all the PaaS providers, but Bungee certainly seemed good for the recreational and professional markets.  Knowing SalesForce/Force.com, they&#8217;d still be going after the SMB and enterprise markets.  So, I think there&#8217;s room for some of the players out there.  Overall, I think the PaaS industry will become very interesting in a year.  </p>
<p>JP<br />
<a href="http://www.convos.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.convos.com'>http://www.convos.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Scoble</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/22/longjump-challenges-forcecom-with-new-developer-suite/comment-page-1/#comment-2477120</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Scoble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 07:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22508#comment-2477120</guid>
		<description>Longjump was recently on WorkFast.TV here: http://www.fastcompany.tv/video/paas-provider-longjump which gives you some more details about what they are doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Longjump was recently on WorkFast.TV here: <a href="http://www.fastcompany.tv/video/paas-provider-longjump" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.fastcompany.tv/video/paas-provider-longjump'>http://www.fast...ovider-longjump</a> which gives you some more details about what they are doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
