<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sugar Inc Skips Ad Network, Launches Blog Platform Instead</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/19/sugar-inc-skips-ad-network-for-now-launches-blog-platform-instead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/19/sugar-inc-skips-ad-network-for-now-launches-blog-platform-instead/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:22:59 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kenneth</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/19/sugar-inc-skips-ad-network-for-now-launches-blog-platform-instead/comment-page-1/#comment-3055414</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 19:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22483#comment-3055414</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the blog post...I use a company online for NICE cheap traffic:http://www.eAdvertisingCompany.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the blog post&#8230;I use a company online for NICE cheap traffic:http://www.eAdvertisingCompany.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sweet New Free Blog Platform: On Sugar at SMOjoe.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/19/sugar-inc-skips-ad-network-for-now-launches-blog-platform-instead/comment-page-1/#comment-2698333</link>
		<dc:creator>Sweet New Free Blog Platform: On Sugar at SMOjoe.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 04:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22483#comment-2698333</guid>
		<description>[...] information on a new free blog site called On Sugar and that&#8217;s when I found an article about On Sugar on TechCrunch where I learned that it launched last [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] information on a new free blog site called On Sugar and that&#8217;s when I found an article about On Sugar on TechCrunch where I learned that it launched last [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glam Teams With GumGum To Serve Free, Legal Images</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/19/sugar-inc-skips-ad-network-for-now-launches-blog-platform-instead/comment-page-1/#comment-2488830</link>
		<dc:creator>Glam Teams With GumGum To Serve Free, Legal Images</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 23:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22483#comment-2488830</guid>
		<description>[...] similar deal with blog network b5media earlier this year. And Glam&#8217;s biggest rival Sugar Inc allows its bloggers to use images from Getty images.   CrunchBase Information   GumGum  Glam Media  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] similar deal with blog network b5media earlier this year. And Glam&#8217;s biggest rival Sugar Inc allows its bloggers to use images from Getty images.   CrunchBase Information   GumGum  Glam Media  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Necati</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/19/sugar-inc-skips-ad-network-for-now-launches-blog-platform-instead/comment-page-1/#comment-2477747</link>
		<dc:creator>Necati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 19:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22483#comment-2477747</guid>
		<description>The short answer is, Yes. You may get started reading here:
http://bookmarks.honewatson.com/2008/04/13/drupal-multisite-set-up-multi-domain-single-user-base/

I see from the linked blog that you are not a coder as myself. I was able to teach myself to build a social network using Drupal, but it took 3 months of reading documentation, tutorials, the Pro Drupal book and hours and hours of webcasts.

It is worth it if you can&#039;t hire a coder though.

Kolay gelsin ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The short answer is, Yes. You may get started reading here:<br />
<a href="http://bookmarks.honewatson.com/2008/04/13/drupal-multisite-set-up-multi-domain-single-user-base/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://bookmarks.honewatson.com/2008/04/13/drupal-multisite-set-up-multi-domain-single-user-base/'>http://bookmark...ngle-user-base/</a></p>
<p>I see from the linked blog that you are not a coder as myself. I was able to teach myself to build a social network using Drupal, but it took 3 months of reading documentation, tutorials, the Pro Drupal book and hours and hours of webcasts.</p>
<p>It is worth it if you can&#8217;t hire a coder though.</p>
<p>Kolay gelsin <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Necati</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/19/sugar-inc-skips-ad-network-for-now-launches-blog-platform-instead/comment-page-1/#comment-2477742</link>
		<dc:creator>Necati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 19:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22483#comment-2477742</guid>
		<description>&quot;So what would you rather have to monetize — 5M uniques like Glam and iVillage on one site or 2.4M spread across 16 silly little sites that have Sugar in the URL?&quot;

What do you have to say about Google&#039;s Adsense Network -of millions of silly little sites?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;So what would you rather have to monetize — 5M uniques like Glam and iVillage on one site or 2.4M spread across 16 silly little sites that have Sugar in the URL?&#8221;</p>
<p>What do you have to say about Google&#8217;s Adsense Network -of millions of silly little sites?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Necati</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/19/sugar-inc-skips-ad-network-for-now-launches-blog-platform-instead/comment-page-1/#comment-2477736</link>
		<dc:creator>Necati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 19:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22483#comment-2477736</guid>
		<description>Sugar people were requested to give code back to Drupal community, and although they did share some wisdom on how their work they claimed code to be too specific to their site. And after all the funding and all I doubt even more that they would share their &quot;product&quot;.

For those who are interested in implementing such a setup, I am thinking that this below may be a first start (plus a lot of content types as suggested).
http://drupal.org/project/og_sites</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sugar people were requested to give code back to Drupal community, and although they did share some wisdom on how their work they claimed code to be too specific to their site. And after all the funding and all I doubt even more that they would share their &#8220;product&#8221;.</p>
<p>For those who are interested in implementing such a setup, I am thinking that this below may be a first start (plus a lot of content types as suggested).<br />
<a href="http://drupal.org/project/og_sites" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://drupal.org/project/og_sites'>http://drupal.o...roject/og_sites</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harrah Casino</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/19/sugar-inc-skips-ad-network-for-now-launches-blog-platform-instead/comment-page-1/#comment-2477428</link>
		<dc:creator>Harrah Casino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 15:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22483#comment-2477428</guid>
		<description>Existing blogs can be imported from Blogger, Wordpress, or Typepad. this is interesting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Existing blogs can be imported from Blogger, Wordpress, or Typepad. this is interesting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ümit</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/19/sugar-inc-skips-ad-network-for-now-launches-blog-platform-instead/comment-page-1/#comment-2476935</link>
		<dc:creator>ümit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 20:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22483#comment-2476935</guid>
		<description>I am not sure if this is right place but i need your ideas. Can i set up a blog network using drupal under different domains? Users must be able to login and write posts all domain with one account. is this possible? I asked this question here because onsugar uses drupal too. I need your knowledge. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sure if this is right place but i need your ideas. Can i set up a blog network using drupal under different domains? Users must be able to login and write posts all domain with one account. is this possible? I asked this question here because onsugar uses drupal too. I need your knowledge. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Glaser</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/19/sugar-inc-skips-ad-network-for-now-launches-blog-platform-instead/comment-page-1/#comment-2476771</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Glaser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 15:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22483#comment-2476771</guid>
		<description>I made a mistake again.  Silly compete is Alexa 2.0

I just checked Quantcast and they are in fact at 8 million uniques.  Wow, I stand corrected again.  Sorry about arguing with myself.

http://www.quantcast.com/p-36POJYHTosuxU</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I made a mistake again.  Silly compete is Alexa 2.0</p>
<p>I just checked Quantcast and they are in fact at 8 million uniques.  Wow, I stand corrected again.  Sorry about arguing with myself.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.quantcast.com/p-36POJYHTosuxU" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.quantcast.com/p-36POJYHTosuxU'>http://www.quan...p-36POJYHTosuxU</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Glaser</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/19/sugar-inc-skips-ad-network-for-now-launches-blog-platform-instead/comment-page-1/#comment-2476770</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Glaser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 15:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22483#comment-2476770</guid>
		<description>I made a mistake again.  Silly Compete is so Alexa 2.0

I just checked Quantcast and they are in fact at 8 million uniques.  Wow, I stand corrected again.  Sorry about arguing with myself.

http://www.quantcast.com/p-36POJYHTosuxU</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I made a mistake again.  Silly Compete is so Alexa 2.0</p>
<p>I just checked Quantcast and they are in fact at 8 million uniques.  Wow, I stand corrected again.  Sorry about arguing with myself.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.quantcast.com/p-36POJYHTosuxU" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.quantcast.com/p-36POJYHTosuxU'>http://www.quan...p-36POJYHTosuxU</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On Sugar Blogging Platform &#124; Run SEO Run!</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/19/sugar-inc-skips-ad-network-for-now-launches-blog-platform-instead/comment-page-1/#comment-2476605</link>
		<dc:creator>On Sugar Blogging Platform &#124; Run SEO Run!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 09:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22483#comment-2476605</guid>
		<description>[...] noticed that I missed an article on TechCrunch which is about Sugar Inc. They have launched a new blogging service OnSugar.com. Of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] noticed that I missed an article on TechCrunch which is about Sugar Inc. They have launched a new blogging service OnSugar.com. Of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristy S.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/19/sugar-inc-skips-ad-network-for-now-launches-blog-platform-instead/comment-page-1/#comment-2476415</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristy S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 23:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22483#comment-2476415</guid>
		<description>Interesting play for Sugar, its more Tumblr than Wordpress, although it misses on the interface and interaction. Honestly I think they should focus on the core of why people go there and not try to be all things to all women. They do fashion and celebrity well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting play for Sugar, its more Tumblr than Wordpress, although it misses on the interface and interaction. Honestly I think they should focus on the core of why people go there and not try to be all things to all women. They do fashion and celebrity well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Glaser</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/19/sugar-inc-skips-ad-network-for-now-launches-blog-platform-instead/comment-page-1/#comment-2476280</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Glaser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 18:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22483#comment-2476280</guid>
		<description>No, no mistake, whoever is pretending to be me. Sugar is still a joke. 

It&#039;s a collection of 16 ridiculously small sites (average traffic of 150K uniques per dinky little site) that add up to 2.4M uniques -- not 8M -- just check the Compete links below. 

http://siteanalytics.compete.com/popsugar.com+glam.com+ivillage.com/?metric=uv

http://siteanalytics.compete.com/bellasugar.com+buzzsugar.com+fabsugar.com/?metric=uv

http://siteanalytics.compete.com/casasugar.com+yumsugar.com+fitsugar.com/?metric=uv

http://siteanalytics.compete.com/geeksugar.com+gigglesugar.com+dearsugar.com/?metric=uv


http://siteanalytics.compete.com/citizensugar.com+teamsugar.com+celebstyle.com/?metric=uv</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, no mistake, whoever is pretending to be me. Sugar is still a joke. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a collection of 16 ridiculously small sites (average traffic of 150K uniques per dinky little site) that add up to 2.4M uniques &#8212; not 8M &#8212; just check the Compete links below. </p>
<p><a href="http://siteanalytics.compete.com/popsugar.com+glam.com+ivillage.com/?metric=uv" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://siteanalytics.compete.com/popsugar.com+glam.com+ivillage.com/?metric=uv'>http://siteanal....com/?metric=uv</a></p>
<p><a href="http://siteanalytics.compete.com/bellasugar.com+buzzsugar.com+fabsugar.com/?metric=uv" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://siteanalytics.compete.com/bellasugar.com+buzzsugar.com+fabsugar.com/?metric=uv'>http://siteanal....com/?metric=uv</a></p>
<p><a href="http://siteanalytics.compete.com/casasugar.com+yumsugar.com+fitsugar.com/?metric=uv" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://siteanalytics.compete.com/casasugar.com+yumsugar.com+fitsugar.com/?metric=uv'>http://siteanal....com/?metric=uv</a></p>
<p><a href="http://siteanalytics.compete.com/geeksugar.com+gigglesugar.com+dearsugar.com/?metric=uv" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://siteanalytics.compete.com/geeksugar.com+gigglesugar.com+dearsugar.com/?metric=uv'>http://siteanal....com/?metric=uv</a></p>
<p><a href="http://siteanalytics.compete.com/citizensugar.com+teamsugar.com+celebstyle.com/?metric=uv" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://siteanalytics.compete.com/citizensugar.com+teamsugar.com+celebstyle.com/?metric=uv'>http://siteanal....com/?metric=uv</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Glaser</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/19/sugar-inc-skips-ad-network-for-now-launches-blog-platform-instead/comment-page-1/#comment-2476278</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Glaser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 18:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22483#comment-2476278</guid>
		<description>No mistake, whoever is pretending to be me. Sugar is still a joke. 

It&#039;s a collection of 16 ridiculously small sites (average traffic of 150K uniques per dinky little site) that add up to 2.4M uniques -- not 8M -- just check the Compete links below. 

So what would you rather have to monetize --  5M uniques like Glam and iVillage on one site or 2.4M spread across 16 silly little sites that have Sugar in the URL?

Here&#039;s all the public Compete data for anyone paying attention and would like to know Sugar is all hype -- no users.

1. PopSugar has only 500K uniques vs Glam and iVillage who have 10x more -- 
http://siteanalytics.compete.com/popsugar.com+glam.com+ivillage.com/?metric=uv

2. BuzzSugar, FabSugar, BellaSugar are good for combined another 300K uniques per month combined: http://siteanalytics.compete.com/bellasugar.com+buzzsugar.com+fabsugar.com/?metric=uv

3. CasaSugar, YumSugar, FitSugar are good for 250K uniques combined:
http://siteanalytics.compete.com/casasugar.com+yumsugar.com+fitsugar.com/?metric=uv

4. GeekSugar, GiggleSugar, DearSugar are good for another 250K uniques combined:
http://siteanalytics.compete.com/geeksugar.com+gigglesugar.com+dearsugar.com/?metric=uv

5. PetSugar, LilSugar, SavvySugar are good for 130K uniques combined:
http://siteanalytics.compete.com/petsugar.com+lilsugar.com+savvysugar.com/?metric=uv

6. CitizenSugar, TeamSugar, CelebStyle are good for 1M uniques combined
http://siteanalytics.compete.com/citizensugar.com+teamsugar.com+celebstyle.com/?metric=uv</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No mistake, whoever is pretending to be me. Sugar is still a joke. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a collection of 16 ridiculously small sites (average traffic of 150K uniques per dinky little site) that add up to 2.4M uniques &#8212; not 8M &#8212; just check the Compete links below. </p>
<p>So what would you rather have to monetize &#8212;  5M uniques like Glam and iVillage on one site or 2.4M spread across 16 silly little sites that have Sugar in the URL?</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s all the public Compete data for anyone paying attention and would like to know Sugar is all hype &#8212; no users.</p>
<p>1. PopSugar has only 500K uniques vs Glam and iVillage who have 10x more &#8212;<br />
<a href="http://siteanalytics.compete.com/popsugar.com+glam.com+ivillage.com/?metric=uv" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://siteanalytics.compete.com/popsugar.com+glam.com+ivillage.com/?metric=uv'>http://siteanal....com/?metric=uv</a></p>
<p>2. BuzzSugar, FabSugar, BellaSugar are good for combined another 300K uniques per month combined: <a href="http://siteanalytics.compete.com/bellasugar.com+buzzsugar.com+fabsugar.com/?metric=uv" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://siteanalytics.compete.com/bellasugar.com+buzzsugar.com+fabsugar.com/?metric=uv'>http://siteanal....com/?metric=uv</a></p>
<p>3. CasaSugar, YumSugar, FitSugar are good for 250K uniques combined:<br />
<a href="http://siteanalytics.compete.com/casasugar.com+yumsugar.com+fitsugar.com/?metric=uv" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://siteanalytics.compete.com/casasugar.com+yumsugar.com+fitsugar.com/?metric=uv'>http://siteanal....com/?metric=uv</a></p>
<p>4. GeekSugar, GiggleSugar, DearSugar are good for another 250K uniques combined:<br />
<a href="http://siteanalytics.compete.com/geeksugar.com+gigglesugar.com+dearsugar.com/?metric=uv" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://siteanalytics.compete.com/geeksugar.com+gigglesugar.com+dearsugar.com/?metric=uv'>http://siteanal....com/?metric=uv</a></p>
<p>5. PetSugar, LilSugar, SavvySugar are good for 130K uniques combined:<br />
<a href="http://siteanalytics.compete.com/petsugar.com+lilsugar.com+savvysugar.com/?metric=uv" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://siteanalytics.compete.com/petsugar.com+lilsugar.com+savvysugar.com/?metric=uv'>http://siteanal....com/?metric=uv</a></p>
<p>6. CitizenSugar, TeamSugar, CelebStyle are good for 1M uniques combined<br />
<a href="http://siteanalytics.compete.com/citizensugar.com+teamsugar.com+celebstyle.com/?metric=uv" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://siteanalytics.compete.com/citizensugar.com+teamsugar.com+celebstyle.com/?metric=uv'>http://siteanal....com/?metric=uv</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Glaser</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/19/sugar-inc-skips-ad-network-for-now-launches-blog-platform-instead/comment-page-1/#comment-2476276</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Glaser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 18:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22483#comment-2476276</guid>
		<description>No, no mistake, whoever is pretending to be me. Sugar is still a joke. 

It&#039;s a collection of 16 ridiculously small sites (average traffic of 150K uniques per dinky little site) that add up to 2.4M uniques -- not 8M -- just check the Compete links below. 

So what would you rather have to monetize --  5M uniques like Glam and iVillage on one site or 2.4M spread across 16 silly little sites that have Sugar in the URL?

Here&#039;s all the public Compete data for anyone paying attention and would like to know Sugar is all hype -- no users.

1. PopSugar has only 500K uniques vs Glam and iVillage who have 10x more -- 
http://siteanalytics.compete.com/popsugar.com+glam.com+ivillage.com/?metric=uv

2. BuzzSugar, FabSugar, BellaSugar are good for combined another 300K uniques per month combined: http://siteanalytics.compete.com/bellasugar.com+buzzsugar.com+fabsugar.com/?metric=uv

3. CasaSugar, YumSugar, FitSugar are good for 250K uniques combined:
http://siteanalytics.compete.com/casasugar.com+yumsugar.com+fitsugar.com/?metric=uv

4. GeekSugar, GiggleSugar, DearSugar are good for another 250K uniques combined:
http://siteanalytics.compete.com/geeksugar.com+gigglesugar.com+dearsugar.com/?metric=uv

5. PetSugar, LilSugar, SavvySugar are good for 130K uniques combined:
http://siteanalytics.compete.com/petsugar.com+lilsugar.com+savvysugar.com/?metric=uv

6. CitizenSugar, TeamSugar, CelebStyle are good for 1M uniques combined
http://siteanalytics.compete.com/citizensugar.com+teamsugar.com+celebstyle.com/?metric=uv</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, no mistake, whoever is pretending to be me. Sugar is still a joke. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a collection of 16 ridiculously small sites (average traffic of 150K uniques per dinky little site) that add up to 2.4M uniques &#8212; not 8M &#8212; just check the Compete links below. </p>
<p>So what would you rather have to monetize &#8212;  5M uniques like Glam and iVillage on one site or 2.4M spread across 16 silly little sites that have Sugar in the URL?</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s all the public Compete data for anyone paying attention and would like to know Sugar is all hype &#8212; no users.</p>
<p>1. PopSugar has only 500K uniques vs Glam and iVillage who have 10x more &#8212;<br />
<a href="http://siteanalytics.compete.com/popsugar.com+glam.com+ivillage.com/?metric=uv" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://siteanalytics.compete.com/popsugar.com+glam.com+ivillage.com/?metric=uv'>http://siteanal....com/?metric=uv</a></p>
<p>2. BuzzSugar, FabSugar, BellaSugar are good for combined another 300K uniques per month combined: <a href="http://siteanalytics.compete.com/bellasugar.com+buzzsugar.com+fabsugar.com/?metric=uv" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://siteanalytics.compete.com/bellasugar.com+buzzsugar.com+fabsugar.com/?metric=uv'>http://siteanal....com/?metric=uv</a></p>
<p>3. CasaSugar, YumSugar, FitSugar are good for 250K uniques combined:<br />
<a href="http://siteanalytics.compete.com/casasugar.com+yumsugar.com+fitsugar.com/?metric=uv" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://siteanalytics.compete.com/casasugar.com+yumsugar.com+fitsugar.com/?metric=uv'>http://siteanal....com/?metric=uv</a></p>
<p>4. GeekSugar, GiggleSugar, DearSugar are good for another 250K uniques combined:<br />
<a href="http://siteanalytics.compete.com/geeksugar.com+gigglesugar.com+dearsugar.com/?metric=uv" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://siteanalytics.compete.com/geeksugar.com+gigglesugar.com+dearsugar.com/?metric=uv'>http://siteanal....com/?metric=uv</a></p>
<p>5. PetSugar, LilSugar, SavvySugar are good for 130K uniques combined:<br />
<a href="http://siteanalytics.compete.com/petsugar.com+lilsugar.com+savvysugar.com/?metric=uv" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://siteanalytics.compete.com/petsugar.com+lilsugar.com+savvysugar.com/?metric=uv'>http://siteanal....com/?metric=uv</a></p>
<p>6. CitizenSugar, TeamSugar, CelebStyle are good for 1M uniques combined<br />
<a href="http://siteanalytics.compete.com/citizensugar.com+teamsugar.com+celebstyle.com/?metric=uv" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://siteanalytics.compete.com/citizensugar.com+teamsugar.com+celebstyle.com/?metric=uv'>http://siteanal....com/?metric=uv</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Glaser</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/19/sugar-inc-skips-ad-network-for-now-launches-blog-platform-instead/comment-page-1/#comment-2476211</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Glaser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 15:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22483#comment-2476211</guid>
		<description>I made a mistake popsugar is only one of their sites. They have over 8 million unique visitors in 2 years</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I made a mistake popsugar is only one of their sites. They have over 8 million unique visitors in 2 years</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: saneyuki</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/19/sugar-inc-skips-ad-network-for-now-launches-blog-platform-instead/comment-page-1/#comment-2476204</link>
		<dc:creator>saneyuki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 15:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22483#comment-2476204</guid>
		<description>Yeah - i admit that this drupal-hackery is pretty slick!  much better than wordpress.com (which i use)

onsugar really looks spot on!  i DO WISH that someone would make a Drupal Installation Profile that looks like this! *drooool</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah &#8211; i admit that this drupal-hackery is pretty slick!  much better than wordpress.com (which i use)</p>
<p>onsugar really looks spot on!  i DO WISH that someone would make a Drupal Installation Profile that looks like this! *drooool</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Glaser</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/19/sugar-inc-skips-ad-network-for-now-launches-blog-platform-instead/comment-page-1/#comment-2476198</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Glaser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 15:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22483#comment-2476198</guid>
		<description>Sugar is a joke. Look at their compete.com stats vs. 10x bigger competitors iVillage and Glam

http://siteanalytics.compete.com/popsugar.com+glam.com+ivillage.com/?metric=uv

500K unique visitors a month and 15M in funding -- that is preposterous.

Will Sugar be around in 5 years -- no.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sugar is a joke. Look at their compete.com stats vs. 10x bigger competitors iVillage and Glam</p>
<p><a href="http://siteanalytics.compete.com/popsugar.com+glam.com+ivillage.com/?metric=uv" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://siteanalytics.compete.com/popsugar.com+glam.com+ivillage.com/?metric=uv'>http://siteanal....com/?metric=uv</a></p>
<p>500K unique visitors a month and 15M in funding &#8212; that is preposterous.</p>
<p>Will Sugar be around in 5 years &#8212; no.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/19/sugar-inc-skips-ad-network-for-now-launches-blog-platform-instead/comment-page-1/#comment-2476196</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 15:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22483#comment-2476196</guid>
		<description>perhaps it may do for drupal what wordpress.com did for wp .org - but in this case, the admin interface is killer, and i&#039;d love to see it turned into an install profile for the larger drupal community...

for those familiar with drupal, the entire interface is simply custom content type names all generated as nodes with unique icons in the interface - others could do this as well, but onsugar has made it far less intimidating for regular people considering how nerdy drupal can get with nodes and taxonomy....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>perhaps it may do for drupal what wordpress.com did for wp .org &#8211; but in this case, the admin interface is killer, and i&#8217;d love to see it turned into an install profile for the larger drupal community&#8230;</p>
<p>for those familiar with drupal, the entire interface is simply custom content type names all generated as nodes with unique icons in the interface &#8211; others could do this as well, but onsugar has made it far less intimidating for regular people considering how nerdy drupal can get with nodes and taxonomy&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adult Social Networking</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/19/sugar-inc-skips-ad-network-for-now-launches-blog-platform-instead/comment-page-1/#comment-2476150</link>
		<dc:creator>Adult Social Networking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 13:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22483#comment-2476150</guid>
		<description>they got list of sugar, sure will use for http://www.hiadults.com and tell our members to use it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they got list of sugar, sure will use for <a href="http://www.hiadults.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.hiadults.com'>http://www.hiadults.com</a> and tell our members to use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/19/sugar-inc-skips-ad-network-for-now-launches-blog-platform-instead/comment-page-1/#comment-2476133</link>
		<dc:creator>Johan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 12:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22483#comment-2476133</guid>
		<description>Please check it out : http://www.mirretro.ru. We would like to hear your comments , please drop us a line .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please check it out : <a href="http://www.mirretro.ru" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.mirretro.ru'>http://www.mirretro.ru</a>. We would like to hear your comments , please drop us a line .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/19/sugar-inc-skips-ad-network-for-now-launches-blog-platform-instead/comment-page-1/#comment-2476132</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 12:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22483#comment-2476132</guid>
		<description>Funding:  	$15M
:)))

this: http://mirretro.ru</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funding:  	$15M<br />
 <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> ))</p>
<p>this: <a href="http://mirretro.ru" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://mirretro.ru'>http://mirretro.ru</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Farmer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/19/sugar-inc-skips-ad-network-for-now-launches-blog-platform-instead/comment-page-1/#comment-2476052</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Farmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 08:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22483#comment-2476052</guid>
		<description>Lay off the Haterade, yo!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lay off the Haterade, yo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virginia Web Design firm</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/19/sugar-inc-skips-ad-network-for-now-launches-blog-platform-instead/comment-page-1/#comment-2476002</link>
		<dc:creator>Virginia Web Design firm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 06:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22483#comment-2476002</guid>
		<description>Whatever people have to say about the Sugar Network, they&#039;ve done a great job of scaling from one site into a network.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever people have to say about the Sugar Network, they&#8217;ve done a great job of scaling from one site into a network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/19/sugar-inc-skips-ad-network-for-now-launches-blog-platform-instead/comment-page-1/#comment-2475992</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 05:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22483#comment-2475992</guid>
		<description>Webmob-ad, is a new start-up that just came out . It is a pioneer in the automation of mobile and web advertsing by creating the only self serve and fully automated marketplace for CPC and CPM advertising . It supports all types text ads, banners and video ads.For publishers , it offers the highest split of earnings you can find out there and much more. It caters to web and mobile Publishers and Advertisers . Web and Mobile Publishers can earn money easier than ever and registering is FREE. Please check it out : http://www.webmob-ad.com. We would like to hear your comments , please drop us a line .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Webmob-ad, is a new start-up that just came out . It is a pioneer in the automation of mobile and web advertsing by creating the only self serve and fully automated marketplace for CPC and CPM advertising . It supports all types text ads, banners and video ads.For publishers , it offers the highest split of earnings you can find out there and much more. It caters to web and mobile Publishers and Advertisers . Web and Mobile Publishers can earn money easier than ever and registering is FREE. Please check it out : <a href="http://www.webmob-ad.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.webmob-ad.com'>http://www.webmob-ad.com</a>. We would like to hear your comments , please drop us a line .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
