<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nathan Myhrvold&#8217;s Patent Extortion Fund Is Reaping Hundreds Of Millions of Dollars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/17/nathan-myhrvolds-patent-extortion-fund-is-reaping-hundreds-of-millions-of-dollars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/17/nathan-myhrvolds-patent-extortion-fund-is-reaping-hundreds-of-millions-of-dollars/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:40:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Is RPX’s “Defensive Patent Aggregation” Simply Patent Extortion By Another Name? &#124; American News World - News And Technology</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/17/nathan-myhrvolds-patent-extortion-fund-is-reaping-hundreds-of-millions-of-dollars/comment-page-1/#comment-2545299</link>
		<dc:creator>Is RPX’s “Defensive Patent Aggregation” Simply Patent Extortion By Another Name? &#124; American News World - News And Technology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22335#comment-2545299</guid>
		<description>[...] Ventures, which buys up billions of dollars worth of patents and then gets companies to license the entire portfolio. If companies decide not to play ball, the threat of massive patenet litigation hangs in the air. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ventures, which buys up billions of dollars worth of patents and then gets companies to license the entire portfolio. If companies decide not to play ball, the threat of massive patenet litigation hangs in the air. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is RPX’s “Defensive Patent Aggregation” Simply Patent Extortion By Another Name? &#124; American News World - News And Technology</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/17/nathan-myhrvolds-patent-extortion-fund-is-reaping-hundreds-of-millions-of-dollars/comment-page-1/#comment-2545298</link>
		<dc:creator>Is RPX’s “Defensive Patent Aggregation” Simply Patent Extortion By Another Name? &#124; American News World - News And Technology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22335#comment-2545298</guid>
		<description>[...] Ventures, which buys up billions of dollars worth of patents and then gets companies to license the entire portfolio. If companies decide not to play ball, the threat of massive patenet litigation hangs in the air. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ventures, which buys up billions of dollars worth of patents and then gets companies to license the entire portfolio. If companies decide not to play ball, the threat of massive patenet litigation hangs in the air. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boycott Novell &#187; Searete a Part of Intellectual Ventures, a Patent-trolling Firm</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/17/nathan-myhrvolds-patent-extortion-fund-is-reaping-hundreds-of-millions-of-dollars/comment-page-1/#comment-2531399</link>
		<dc:creator>Boycott Novell &#187; Searete a Part of Intellectual Ventures, a Patent-trolling Firm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 12:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22335#comment-2531399</guid>
		<description>[...] he still worked there) have been secretly moonlighting at Intellectual Ventures (IV), the &#8216;patent extortion fund&#8216; run by Bill&#8217;s pal Nathan Myhrvold. A Microsoft spokesman confirmed that its [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] he still worked there) have been secretly moonlighting at Intellectual Ventures (IV), the &#8216;patent extortion fund&#8216; run by Bill&#8217;s pal Nathan Myhrvold. A Microsoft spokesman confirmed that its [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slashdot &#124; Top Microsoft Execs Moonlighting For a Patent Bully at DuffTech</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/17/nathan-myhrvolds-patent-extortion-fund-is-reaping-hundreds-of-millions-of-dollars/comment-page-1/#comment-2530986</link>
		<dc:creator>Slashdot &#124; Top Microsoft Execs Moonlighting For a Patent Bully at DuffTech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 02:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22335#comment-2530986</guid>
		<description>[...] he still worked there) have been secretly moonlighting at Intellectual Ventures (IV), the &#8216;patent extortion fund&#8216; run by Bill&#8217;s pal Nathan Myhrvold. A Microsoft spokesman confirmed that its [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] he still worked there) have been secretly moonlighting at Intellectual Ventures (IV), the &#8216;patent extortion fund&#8216; run by Bill&#8217;s pal Nathan Myhrvold. A Microsoft spokesman confirmed that its [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who Should Obama Hire To Be America&#8217;s CTO? &#171; SmoothSpan Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/17/nathan-myhrvolds-patent-extortion-fund-is-reaping-hundreds-of-millions-of-dollars/comment-page-1/#comment-2526645</link>
		<dc:creator>Who Should Obama Hire To Be America&#8217;s CTO? &#171; SmoothSpan Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 04:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22335#comment-2526645</guid>
		<description>[...] he is a good choice.  Why is Nathan the worst choice possible?  Because he is running perhaps the Mother of all Patent Trolls.  He is exploiting the system to a prodigious degree for personal gain at the expense of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] he is a good choice.  Why is Nathan the worst choice possible?  Because he is running perhaps the Mother of all Patent Trolls.  He is exploiting the system to a prodigious degree for personal gain at the expense of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Your Business Method Patent Has Just Been Invalidated</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/17/nathan-myhrvolds-patent-extortion-fund-is-reaping-hundreds-of-millions-of-dollars/comment-page-1/#comment-2521043</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Blog Archive &#187; Your Business Method Patent Has Just Been Invalidated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 23:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22335#comment-2521043</guid>
		<description>[...] are not patentable unless they meet fairly narrow rules. What this means for Internet companies and patent trolls alike is that many of their existing patents may be invalid—at least until the case is heard by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are not patentable unless they meet fairly narrow rules. What this means for Internet companies and patent trolls alike is that many of their existing patents may be invalid—at least until the case is heard by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thetrystero</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/17/nathan-myhrvolds-patent-extortion-fund-is-reaping-hundreds-of-millions-of-dollars/comment-page-1/#comment-2519536</link>
		<dc:creator>thetrystero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 12:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22335#comment-2519536</guid>
		<description>Just got back from the USPTO. I now own the patent to the idea of patenting an idea. Oh, and I paid extra to have it be retroactively activated. And yes, I&#039;m hiring so all you JDs can send your resume my way and we can take over the world together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just got back from the USPTO. I now own the patent to the idea of patenting an idea. Oh, and I paid extra to have it be retroactively activated. And yes, I&#8217;m hiring so all you JDs can send your resume my way and we can take over the world together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; あなたのビジネス特許が無効になりました</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/17/nathan-myhrvolds-patent-extortion-fund-is-reaping-hundreds-of-millions-of-dollars/comment-page-1/#comment-2519103</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; あなたのビジネス特許が無効になりました</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 02:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22335#comment-2519103</guid>
		<description>[...] 昨年米国で1330件交付されたビジネスモデル特許の所有者の方々、および過去10年間にわたって無差別乱発気味に交付を受けた何千人の方々には、恐らく運がなかった。ワシントンDCの米国控訴裁判所は本日（米国時間10/30）、ビジネスモデル特許は、きわめて厳格な規則に沿ったものを除き、特許取得は不可能であるという裁定を下した。これがインターネット企業や特許ゴロたちにとってどんな意味があるかといえば、彼らが持っている既存の特許の大部分が無効になるということだ。少なくとも、訴訟が最高裁で審議されるまでは（上告すればの話だが）。 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 昨年米国で1330件交付されたビジネスモデル特許の所有者の方々、および過去10年間にわたって無差別乱発気味に交付を受けた何千人の方々には、恐らく運がなかった。ワシントンDCの米国控訴裁判所は本日（米国時間10/30）、ビジネスモデル特許は、きわめて厳格な規則に沿ったものを除き、特許取得は不可能であるという裁定を下した。これがインターネット企業や特許ゴロたちにとってどんな意味があるかといえば、彼らが持っている既存の特許の大部分が無効になるということだ。少なくとも、訴訟が最高裁で審議されるまでは（上告すればの話だが）。 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Your Business Method Patent Has Just Been Invalidated : VCsAndAngels - Venture Capital / VCs, Angel Investors, Startup News, Etc</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/17/nathan-myhrvolds-patent-extortion-fund-is-reaping-hundreds-of-millions-of-dollars/comment-page-1/#comment-2518891</link>
		<dc:creator>Your Business Method Patent Has Just Been Invalidated : VCsAndAngels - Venture Capital / VCs, Angel Investors, Startup News, Etc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 23:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22335#comment-2518891</guid>
		<description>[...] are not patentable unless they meet fairly narrow rules. What this means for Internet companies and patent trolls alike is that many of their existing patents may be invalid—at least until the case is heard by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are not patentable unless they meet fairly narrow rules. What this means for Internet companies and patent trolls alike is that many of their existing patents may be invalid—at least until the case is heard by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Your Business Method Patent Has Just Been Invalidated</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/17/nathan-myhrvolds-patent-extortion-fund-is-reaping-hundreds-of-millions-of-dollars/comment-page-1/#comment-2518848</link>
		<dc:creator>Your Business Method Patent Has Just Been Invalidated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 23:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22335#comment-2518848</guid>
		<description>[...] are not patentable unless they meet fairly narrow rules. What this means for Internet companies and patent trolls alike is that many of their existing patents may be invalid—at least until the case is heard by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are not patentable unless they meet fairly narrow rules. What this means for Internet companies and patent trolls alike is that many of their existing patents may be invalid—at least until the case is heard by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon2</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/17/nathan-myhrvolds-patent-extortion-fund-is-reaping-hundreds-of-millions-of-dollars/comment-page-1/#comment-2511107</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 04:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22335#comment-2511107</guid>
		<description>Totally agree.  I was at Microsoft during many of the years Mhyrvold was there.  He really liked to hear himself speak, and loved to hang around when interesting things were being invented by others.  Yet, he was the guy who wrote a famous memo that said Microsoft ought to be doing more &quot;original content&quot; investment like Slate, and less &quot;zero margin transaction plays&quot; like Expedia.com (which went on to become a $9 billion company).  

And where was he when the Internet wave came crashing upon us?  Some visionary.  He got it dead wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree.  I was at Microsoft during many of the years Mhyrvold was there.  He really liked to hear himself speak, and loved to hang around when interesting things were being invented by others.  Yet, he was the guy who wrote a famous memo that said Microsoft ought to be doing more &#8220;original content&#8221; investment like Slate, and less &#8220;zero margin transaction plays&#8221; like Expedia.com (which went on to become a $9 billion company).  </p>
<p>And where was he when the Internet wave came crashing upon us?  Some visionary.  He got it dead wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: All about Microsoft mobile edition</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/17/nathan-myhrvolds-patent-extortion-fund-is-reaping-hundreds-of-millions-of-dollars/comment-page-1/#comment-2510586</link>
		<dc:creator>All about Microsoft mobile edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 19:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22335#comment-2510586</guid>
		<description>[...] of computer hardware and software.&#039;&quot; Whenever I hear &quot;think tank,&quot; I can&#039;t help but think about former Softie Nathan Myhrvold&#039;s Intellectual Ventures -- a company many describe as a &quot;patent trolling&quot; organization. Hopefully Microsoft&#039;s chairman [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of computer hardware and software.&#8217;&#8221; Whenever I hear &#8220;think tank,&#8221; I can&#8217;t help but think about former Softie Nathan Myhrvold&#8217;s Intellectual Ventures &#8212; a company many describe as a &#8220;patent trolling&#8221; organization. Hopefully Microsoft&#8217;s chairman [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Time To Lose Righteous Indignation Over Patents</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/17/nathan-myhrvolds-patent-extortion-fund-is-reaping-hundreds-of-millions-of-dollars/comment-page-1/#comment-2503076</link>
		<dc:creator>Time To Lose Righteous Indignation Over Patents</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22335#comment-2503076</guid>
		<description>[...] this wasn&#8217;t  on display in Erick Schonfeld&#8217;s TechCrunch post from last week. While responding to the Wall Street Journal&#8217;s examination of patent [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this wasn&#8217;t  on display in Erick Schonfeld&#8217;s TechCrunch post from last week. While responding to the Wall Street Journal&#8217;s examination of patent [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Business Model Based On Litigation?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/17/nathan-myhrvolds-patent-extortion-fund-is-reaping-hundreds-of-millions-of-dollars/comment-page-1/#comment-2489151</link>
		<dc:creator>A Business Model Based On Litigation?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 07:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22335#comment-2489151</guid>
		<description>[...] Erick Schonfeld, &#8220;Nathan Myhrvold&#8217;s Patent Extortion Fund Is Reaping Hundreds Of Million...   Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Erick Schonfeld, &#8220;Nathan Myhrvold&#8217;s Patent Extortion Fund Is Reaping Hundreds Of Million&#8230;   Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurent GUERBY</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/17/nathan-myhrvolds-patent-extortion-fund-is-reaping-hundreds-of-millions-of-dollars/comment-page-1/#comment-2485980</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurent GUERBY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 17:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22335#comment-2485980</guid>
		<description>Patents are Free market ??? What are you smoking ???

Here is something to read about intellectual property and patents :

&quot;&quot;&quot;    Just to illustrate how great out ignorance of the optimum forms of delimitation of various rights remains - despite our confidence in the indispensability of the general institution of several property - a few remarks about one particuilar form of property may be made. [...]

    The difference between these and other kinds of property rights is this: while ownership of material goods guides the user of scarce means to their most important uses, in the case of immaterial goods such as literary productions and technological inventions the ability to produce them is also limited, yet once they have come into existence, they can be indefinitely multiplied and can be made scarce only by law in order to create an inducement to produce such ideas. Yet it is not obvious that such forced scarcity is the most effective way to stimulate the human creative process. I doubt whether there exists a single great work of literature which we would not possess had the author been unable to obtain an exclusive copyright for it; it seems to me that the case for copyright must rest almost entirely on the circumstance that such exceedingly useful works as encyclopaedias, dictionaries, textbooks and other works of reference could not be produced if, once they existed, they could freely be reproduced.

    Similarly, recurrent re-examinations of the problem have not demonstrated that the obtainability of patents of invention actually enhances the flow of new technical knowledge rather than leading to wasteful concentration of research on problems whose solution in the near future can be foreseen and where, in consequence of the law, anyone who hits upon a solution a moment before the next gains the right to its exclusive use for a prolonged period.&quot;&quot;&quot;

    The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism, 1988 (p. 35) Friedrich von Hayek

=&gt; Patents is communism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patents are Free market ??? What are you smoking ???</p>
<p>Here is something to read about intellectual property and patents :</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8221;"    Just to illustrate how great out ignorance of the optimum forms of delimitation of various rights remains &#8211; despite our confidence in the indispensability of the general institution of several property &#8211; a few remarks about one particuilar form of property may be made. [...]</p>
<p>    The difference between these and other kinds of property rights is this: while ownership of material goods guides the user of scarce means to their most important uses, in the case of immaterial goods such as literary productions and technological inventions the ability to produce them is also limited, yet once they have come into existence, they can be indefinitely multiplied and can be made scarce only by law in order to create an inducement to produce such ideas. Yet it is not obvious that such forced scarcity is the most effective way to stimulate the human creative process. I doubt whether there exists a single great work of literature which we would not possess had the author been unable to obtain an exclusive copyright for it; it seems to me that the case for copyright must rest almost entirely on the circumstance that such exceedingly useful works as encyclopaedias, dictionaries, textbooks and other works of reference could not be produced if, once they existed, they could freely be reproduced.</p>
<p>    Similarly, recurrent re-examinations of the problem have not demonstrated that the obtainability of patents of invention actually enhances the flow of new technical knowledge rather than leading to wasteful concentration of research on problems whose solution in the near future can be foreseen and where, in consequence of the law, anyone who hits upon a solution a moment before the next gains the right to its exclusive use for a prolonged period.&#8221;"&#8221;</p>
<p>    The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism, 1988 (p. 35) Friedrich von Hayek</p>
<p>=&gt; Patents is communism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: If You Had the Opportunity to Steal, And Someone Stole, Are You Guilty? &#171; SmoothSpan Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/17/nathan-myhrvolds-patent-extortion-fund-is-reaping-hundreds-of-millions-of-dollars/comment-page-1/#comment-2481271</link>
		<dc:creator>If You Had the Opportunity to Steal, And Someone Stole, Are You Guilty? &#171; SmoothSpan Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 15:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22335#comment-2481271</guid>
		<description>[...] So the trolls get paid.  There are public companies that make their business on nothing but this sort of practice.  It has gotten so lucrative that individuals once engaged in creating intellectual property are increasingly being lured into the business.  Nathan Myhrvold&#8217;s Intellectual Ventures owns 20,000 patents and has so far returned over a bil.... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So the trolls get paid.  There are public companies that make their business on nothing but this sort of practice.  It has gotten so lucrative that individuals once engaged in creating intellectual property are increasingly being lured into the business.  Nathan Myhrvold&#8217;s Intellectual Ventures owns 20,000 patents and has so far returned over a bil&#8230;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boycott Novell &#187; More Microsoft Patent Trolls, Extortions, and SCO</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/17/nathan-myhrvolds-patent-extortion-fund-is-reaping-hundreds-of-millions-of-dollars/comment-page-1/#comment-2476385</link>
		<dc:creator>Boycott Novell &#187; More Microsoft Patent Trolls, Extortions, and SCO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 21:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22335#comment-2476385</guid>
		<description>[...] calls it a &#8220;Patent Extortion Fund.&#8221;  Don’t blame Nathan Myhrvold for taking advantage of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] calls it a &#8220;Patent Extortion Fund.&#8221;  Don’t blame Nathan Myhrvold for taking advantage of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/17/nathan-myhrvolds-patent-extortion-fund-is-reaping-hundreds-of-millions-of-dollars/comment-page-1/#comment-2476333</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 19:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22335#comment-2476333</guid>
		<description>The patent system could use some fixing.  It will be interesting to see if the stalled Patent Reform Act of 2007 will gain renewed support.  At the very least, the new Allied Security Trust and RPX Rational Patent means competition for Myhrvold, which is always a good thing for consumers and innovators.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The patent system could use some fixing.  It will be interesting to see if the stalled Patent Reform Act of 2007 will gain renewed support.  At the very least, the new Allied Security Trust and RPX Rational Patent means competition for Myhrvold, which is always a good thing for consumers and innovators.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The State of Intellectual Property</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/17/nathan-myhrvolds-patent-extortion-fund-is-reaping-hundreds-of-millions-of-dollars/comment-page-1/#comment-2476332</link>
		<dc:creator>The State of Intellectual Property</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 19:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22335#comment-2476332</guid>
		<description>[...] Ventures as one outfit that could drive patents toward an elevated asset class status. In a recent TechCrunch post about Myhrvold, it appears he&#8217;s gone a long way in pushing patents to become more liquid and tradeable. In [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ventures as one outfit that could drive patents toward an elevated asset class status. In a recent TechCrunch post about Myhrvold, it appears he&#8217;s gone a long way in pushing patents to become more liquid and tradeable. In [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sara</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/17/nathan-myhrvolds-patent-extortion-fund-is-reaping-hundreds-of-millions-of-dollars/comment-page-1/#comment-2475470</link>
		<dc:creator>Sara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 19:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22335#comment-2475470</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m thankful for Office Space every time I read/hear someone use the &quot;no talent ass clown&quot; insult.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m thankful for Office Space every time I read/hear someone use the &#8220;no talent ass clown&#8221; insult.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Howard</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/17/nathan-myhrvolds-patent-extortion-fund-is-reaping-hundreds-of-millions-of-dollars/comment-page-1/#comment-2475368</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 17:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22335#comment-2475368</guid>
		<description>Doesn&#039;t this amount to a Pyramid scheme?  You threaten to sue a company but get them to invest in you instead, on the premise that they can threaten to sue more companies, who will then buy in to the fund . . . I guess the SEC and the rest are a little busy these days . . .

-danny</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t this amount to a Pyramid scheme?  You threaten to sue a company but get them to invest in you instead, on the premise that they can threaten to sue more companies, who will then buy in to the fund . . . I guess the SEC and the rest are a little busy these days . . .</p>
<p>-danny</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raceofgiants</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/17/nathan-myhrvolds-patent-extortion-fund-is-reaping-hundreds-of-millions-of-dollars/comment-page-1/#comment-2474163</link>
		<dc:creator>raceofgiants</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 23:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22335#comment-2474163</guid>
		<description>If large companies were met with rules regarding the size of their patent portfolio, they would just start registering them under different companies, subsidiaries, and employee names. Too easy.

I think they should be forced to get a product to market in a certain time period. Otherwise the patent reverts to the original inventor, expires or is auctioned off. Either way, the timer resets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If large companies were met with rules regarding the size of their patent portfolio, they would just start registering them under different companies, subsidiaries, and employee names. Too easy.</p>
<p>I think they should be forced to get a product to market in a certain time period. Otherwise the patent reverts to the original inventor, expires or is auctioned off. Either way, the timer resets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/17/nathan-myhrvolds-patent-extortion-fund-is-reaping-hundreds-of-millions-of-dollars/comment-page-1/#comment-2473721</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 17:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22335#comment-2473721</guid>
		<description>I did, and I agree. It sounds like jealousy on the part of many of this thread&#039;s posters. Exploit a broken system for profit. System gets fixed. System is no longer exploitable. We all win in the end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did, and I agree. It sounds like jealousy on the part of many of this thread&#8217;s posters. Exploit a broken system for profit. System gets fixed. System is no longer exploitable. We all win in the end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/17/nathan-myhrvolds-patent-extortion-fund-is-reaping-hundreds-of-millions-of-dollars/comment-page-1/#comment-2473717</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 17:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22335#comment-2473717</guid>
		<description>Google isn&#039;t incapable of evil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google isn&#8217;t incapable of evil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hulk</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/17/nathan-myhrvolds-patent-extortion-fund-is-reaping-hundreds-of-millions-of-dollars/comment-page-1/#comment-2473620</link>
		<dc:creator>Hulk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=22335#comment-2473620</guid>
		<description>Get that cash</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get that cash</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
