<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is There A Recipe For Success In Mobile App Stores?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/01/is-there-a-recipe-for-success-in-mobile-app-stores/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/01/is-there-a-recipe-for-success-in-mobile-app-stores/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 23:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/01/is-there-a-recipe-for-success-in-mobile-app-stores/comment-page-1/#comment-2667964</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=21616#comment-2667964</guid>
		<description>IPHONE SDK IS the most powerful. 

I've developed several paid apps for the iphone. I've also programed in .NET for the past 10 years.

What makes the SDK huge is not the programming language (Objective-C) it is the SDK itself. The ability to do complex animations, play audio, respond to touches, react to phone movement. All with a FEW LINES OF CODE!!!

Please...How powerfull a language is means mothing unless you can get great stuff done quickly! 

I love .NET, like Java, and really don't like much Objective-C, but who cares?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IPHONE SDK IS the most powerful. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve developed several paid apps for the iphone. I&#8217;ve also programed in .NET for the past 10 years.</p>
<p>What makes the SDK huge is not the programming language (Objective-C) it is the SDK itself. The ability to do complex animations, play audio, respond to touches, react to phone movement. All with a FEW LINES OF CODE!!!</p>
<p>Please&#8230;How powerfull a language is means mothing unless you can get great stuff done quickly! </p>
<p>I love .NET, like Java, and really don&#8217;t like much Objective-C, but who cares?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NGT News (Now on Fridays!): Waiting for GDGT, The CW Mobile Moves, A Must-See Documentary</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/01/is-there-a-recipe-for-success-in-mobile-app-stores/comment-page-1/#comment-2460152</link>
		<dc:creator>NGT News (Now on Fridays!): Waiting for GDGT, The CW Mobile Moves, A Must-See Documentary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 21:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=21616#comment-2460152</guid>
		<description>[...] In 10 Contactless Payments Trialists Like The IdeaParamount Developing Mobile Comics Based On FilmsA Recipe For Success In Mobile App StoresQR Codes at Ralph Lauren's Rugby [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In 10 Contactless Payments Trialists Like The IdeaParamount Developing Mobile Comics Based On FilmsA Recipe For Success In Mobile App StoresQR Codes at Ralph Lauren&#8217;s Rugby [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My wishes for the perfect mobile device &#8212; Vad NU!</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/01/is-there-a-recipe-for-success-in-mobile-app-stores/comment-page-1/#comment-2459070</link>
		<dc:creator>My wishes for the perfect mobile device &#8212; Vad NU!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 05:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=21616#comment-2459070</guid>
		<description>[...] lot have been said about Apple&#8217;s iPhone, and some of the other platform vendors are making plans to offer their own versions of the app [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] lot have been said about Apple&#8217;s iPhone, and some of the other platform vendors are making plans to offer their own versions of the app [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irene Schwarting</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/01/is-there-a-recipe-for-success-in-mobile-app-stores/comment-page-1/#comment-2454573</link>
		<dc:creator>Irene Schwarting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 21:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=21616#comment-2454573</guid>
		<description>I think this article missed one criterion that will become increasingly important as mobile applications become more common: 

7. a marketplace presentation that understands users' requirements/expectations and presents them with _relevant_ applications. 

There are simply so many apps available through the appstore - or through Handango, or other store-of-choice- that it is becoming very hard for users to find the 'right' or the 'best' app of any given type, or to become aware of unique/unusual applications that are particularly relevant. I think it will become more and more valuable for the store/distribution system to incorporate user understanding into prioritizing the presentation of the applications. None of the currently popular platforms or stores have this capability, although there are some startups and small players that do. It requires a fundamentally different approach to designing and positioning the store.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this article missed one criterion that will become increasingly important as mobile applications become more common: </p>
<p>7. a marketplace presentation that understands users&#8217; requirements/expectations and presents them with _relevant_ applications. </p>
<p>There are simply so many apps available through the appstore - or through Handango, or other store-of-choice- that it is becoming very hard for users to find the &#8216;right&#8217; or the &#8216;best&#8217; app of any given type, or to become aware of unique/unusual applications that are particularly relevant. I think it will become more and more valuable for the store/distribution system to incorporate user understanding into prioritizing the presentation of the applications. None of the currently popular platforms or stores have this capability, although there are some startups and small players that do. It requires a fundamentally different approach to designing and positioning the store.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/01/is-there-a-recipe-for-success-in-mobile-app-stores/comment-page-1/#comment-2454030</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 16:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=21616#comment-2454030</guid>
		<description>I've written up some tips on how to one up the App Store by harnessing the power of good design: http://jordankanarek.com/?p=30</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve written up some tips on how to one up the App Store by harnessing the power of good design: <a href="http://jordankanarek.com/?p=30" rel="nofollow">http://jordankanarek.com/?p=30</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Collins</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/01/is-there-a-recipe-for-success-in-mobile-app-stores/comment-page-1/#comment-2453790</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 13:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=21616#comment-2453790</guid>
		<description>I must be missing something, since I know you can download and install Windows Mobile apps over the air. I've downloaded and installed Tiny Twitter, Google Maps, and Opera mobile to name a few.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must be missing something, since I know you can download and install Windows Mobile apps over the air. I&#8217;ve downloaded and installed Tiny Twitter, Google Maps, and Opera mobile to name a few.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josh</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/01/is-there-a-recipe-for-success-in-mobile-app-stores/comment-page-1/#comment-2453769</link>
		<dc:creator>josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 13:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=21616#comment-2453769</guid>
		<description>One question that I can't find an answer for...
Can you sell an app that you made in Dashcode in the store, or does it have to be an Xcoded app?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One question that I can&#8217;t find an answer for&#8230;<br />
Can you sell an app that you made in Dashcode in the store, or does it have to be an Xcoded app?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tinyCrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Microsoft Stands Up To Apple&#8217;s App Store</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/01/is-there-a-recipe-for-success-in-mobile-app-stores/comment-page-1/#comment-2453126</link>
		<dc:creator>tinyCrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Microsoft Stands Up To Apple&#8217;s App Store</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 01:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=21616#comment-2453126</guid>
		<description>[...] tiny from: TechCrunch.com original post    &#171; The Ethics Of Cuil&#8217;s Indexing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tiny from: TechCrunch.com original post    &laquo; The Ethics Of Cuil&#8217;s Indexing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/01/is-there-a-recipe-for-success-in-mobile-app-stores/comment-page-1/#comment-2452938</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 22:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=21616#comment-2452938</guid>
		<description>Surprised you didn't reference your own (TechCrunch) story ( http://bit.ly/43iERo ) on  Mpowerplayer, the Launchbox Digital company.  They have the best (only?) try-before-you-buy system for non-iPhone games and apps, and came out of Launchbox with a killer Facebook version.  www.mpowerplayer.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surprised you didn&#8217;t reference your own (TechCrunch) story ( <a href="http://bit.ly/43iERo" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/43iERo</a> ) on  Mpowerplayer, the Launchbox Digital company.  They have the best (only?) try-before-you-buy system for non-iPhone games and apps, and came out of Launchbox with a killer Facebook version.  <a href="http://www.mpowerplayer.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.mpowerplayer.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/01/is-there-a-recipe-for-success-in-mobile-app-stores/comment-page-1/#comment-2452913</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 22:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=21616#comment-2452913</guid>
		<description>What's wrong with handango? They've been an "App Store" for years</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s wrong with handango? They&#8217;ve been an &#8220;App Store&#8221; for years</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Mornini</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/01/is-there-a-recipe-for-success-in-mobile-app-stores/comment-page-1/#comment-2452883</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Mornini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 21:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=21616#comment-2452883</guid>
		<description>Salesforce is there. Medical applications, both from a consumer and physician viewpoint, are there.

Surely more "Enterprise" applications will come to the iPhone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Salesforce is there. Medical applications, both from a consumer and physician viewpoint, are there.</p>
<p>Surely more &#8220;Enterprise&#8221; applications will come to the iPhone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sabrina</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/01/is-there-a-recipe-for-success-in-mobile-app-stores/comment-page-1/#comment-2452847</link>
		<dc:creator>sabrina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 21:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=21616#comment-2452847</guid>
		<description>i agree that this is a rather poorly-written article.  come on, don, at least update your little table to reflect that RIM would now be 4 with Apple.

still, i think "guys continually leave Nokia out of the equation" because they do not claim a significant share in the US smartphone market, however dominant they are globally.  RIM first, apple coming second, according to the latest research.

Handango has been around for ages, as has apps for Windows Mobile, but so what?  They obviously didn't know the best way to optimize their application markets.

Finally, you are flat out wrong in saying that the competing app stores for J2ME/Symbian phones has helped keep prices low.  The average price points for apps on Handango is around $20.  For the App Store it is below $10, with at least 20% of the apps available being offered for free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree that this is a rather poorly-written article.  come on, don, at least update your little table to reflect that RIM would now be 4 with Apple.</p>
<p>still, i think &#8220;guys continually leave Nokia out of the equation&#8221; because they do not claim a significant share in the US smartphone market, however dominant they are globally.  RIM first, apple coming second, according to the latest research.</p>
<p>Handango has been around for ages, as has apps for Windows Mobile, but so what?  They obviously didn&#8217;t know the best way to optimize their application markets.</p>
<p>Finally, you are flat out wrong in saying that the competing app stores for J2ME/Symbian phones has helped keep prices low.  The average price points for apps on Handango is around $20.  For the App Store it is below $10, with at least 20% of the apps available being offered for free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JLP</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/01/is-there-a-recipe-for-success-in-mobile-app-stores/comment-page-1/#comment-2452836</link>
		<dc:creator>JLP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 21:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=21616#comment-2452836</guid>
		<description>One main item that attracts developers to the iPhone platform is that they make the user experience seamless, so more apps are viewed/downloaded/sold.  It has its flaws, but from EVERY iPhone, you can browse, download, install, and purchase. And users know this.

One WM and Palm devices, who have had mobile software since the turn of the century, there has been no uniform way to do any of these tasks.  Except for power-users, users did not know that you could add software (no store on device), could not download OTA (a recent possibility and user knowledge on how-to is spotty), installation was a nightmare (from internet to desktop to device), the purchase experience was varied (Palm/Pocket Gear, Handango, Mobihand, Dev sites, etc), and also delivery of the "unlock" registration code for shareware was also varied by site (via email (spam issues), automatic, or otherwise).   

The AppStore solves all those distribution issues for the developer, which with the other advantages noted in this article, makes it very attractive for everyone.

A few side comments, with RIM and Symbian, you only can browse certain titles (it's not easy to get approved or get onto "the stores"), and with the other Electronic Software Distributors (ESD's), like Handango, they can take upwards of 40-75% of the sale prices.

I recently covered some of this in more detail on our blog "Mobile Evolution"...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One main item that attracts developers to the iPhone platform is that they make the user experience seamless, so more apps are viewed/downloaded/sold.  It has its flaws, but from EVERY iPhone, you can browse, download, install, and purchase. And users know this.</p>
<p>One WM and Palm devices, who have had mobile software since the turn of the century, there has been no uniform way to do any of these tasks.  Except for power-users, users did not know that you could add software (no store on device), could not download OTA (a recent possibility and user knowledge on how-to is spotty), installation was a nightmare (from internet to desktop to device), the purchase experience was varied (Palm/Pocket Gear, Handango, Mobihand, Dev sites, etc), and also delivery of the &#8220;unlock&#8221; registration code for shareware was also varied by site (via email (spam issues), automatic, or otherwise).   </p>
<p>The AppStore solves all those distribution issues for the developer, which with the other advantages noted in this article, makes it very attractive for everyone.</p>
<p>A few side comments, with RIM and Symbian, you only can browse certain titles (it&#8217;s not easy to get approved or get onto &#8220;the stores&#8221;), and with the other Electronic Software Distributors (ESD&#8217;s), like Handango, they can take upwards of 40-75% of the sale prices.</p>
<p>I recently covered some of this in more detail on our blog &#8220;Mobile Evolution&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JLP</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/01/is-there-a-recipe-for-success-in-mobile-app-stores/comment-page-1/#comment-2452815</link>
		<dc:creator>JLP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 20:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=21616#comment-2452815</guid>
		<description>One difference is Handango takes 50-75% of profits from the developer and doesn't list all the apps in it's OTA store.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One difference is Handango takes 50-75% of profits from the developer and doesn&#8217;t list all the apps in it&#8217;s OTA store.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nemrut</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/01/is-there-a-recipe-for-success-in-mobile-app-stores/comment-page-1/#comment-2452800</link>
		<dc:creator>nemrut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 20:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=21616#comment-2452800</guid>
		<description>The key here is the device.  None of the RIM/MS phones come close to the overall form factor and ease-of-use of the iphone.  Until that happens and more phones offer similar screen real estate and non-painful brwser experience, iPhone will continue to attract more developers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The key here is the device.  None of the RIM/MS phones come close to the overall form factor and ease-of-use of the iphone.  Until that happens and more phones offer similar screen real estate and non-painful brwser experience, iPhone will continue to attract more developers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WigWam</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/01/is-there-a-recipe-for-success-in-mobile-app-stores/comment-page-1/#comment-2452776</link>
		<dc:creator>WigWam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 20:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=21616#comment-2452776</guid>
		<description>I guess RIM really wins... the SDK is indeed powerful, and you can do mobile downloads, giving RIM a 5 and Apple a 4.

Non technical people seem to often make the mistake that great UI = powerful SDK. Just because a window can slide across the screen, or an alert box has nice gradients doesn't mean it's powerful.

I'm not saying Apple's SDK is weak by any means, but there are some limitations they place on it, that imo, make the RIM SDK more powerful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess RIM really wins&#8230; the SDK is indeed powerful, and you can do mobile downloads, giving RIM a 5 and Apple a 4.</p>
<p>Non technical people seem to often make the mistake that great UI = powerful SDK. Just because a window can slide across the screen, or an alert box has nice gradients doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s powerful.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying Apple&#8217;s SDK is weak by any means, but there are some limitations they place on it, that imo, make the RIM SDK more powerful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: srw</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/01/is-there-a-recipe-for-success-in-mobile-app-stores/comment-page-1/#comment-2452757</link>
		<dc:creator>srw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 19:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=21616#comment-2452757</guid>
		<description>I think Dan must be fired from TechCrunch!

iPhone is cool, but saying Mobile Windows doesn't have a "powerful sdk" seems very stupid! and Dan forgot that Visual Studio is much more powerful than Xcode.

Give only one more oportunity for Dan :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Dan must be fired from TechCrunch!</p>
<p>iPhone is cool, but saying Mobile Windows doesn&#8217;t have a &#8220;powerful sdk&#8221; seems very stupid! and Dan forgot that Visual Studio is much more powerful than Xcode.</p>
<p>Give only one more oportunity for Dan <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/01/is-there-a-recipe-for-success-in-mobile-app-stores/comment-page-1/#comment-2452748</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 19:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=21616#comment-2452748</guid>
		<description>Is there really room for more than one here?  Isn't MS (and goog for that matter) getting Gatesd here?  iPhone and AppStore is more than a singular product--it's the new de facto platform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there really room for more than one here?  Isn&#8217;t MS (and goog for that matter) getting Gatesd here?  iPhone and AppStore is more than a singular product&#8211;it&#8217;s the new de facto platform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sriram Krishnan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/01/is-there-a-recipe-for-success-in-mobile-app-stores/comment-page-1/#comment-2452742</link>
		<dc:creator>Sriram Krishnan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 19:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=21616#comment-2452742</guid>
		<description>Don - I worked on the developer experience for Windows Mobile some time ago. You're way off here. I would suggest playing with Visual Studio to see what the experience is like or downloading just the SDKs alone and seeing the samples.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don - I worked on the developer experience for Windows Mobile some time ago. You&#8217;re way off here. I would suggest playing with Visual Studio to see what the experience is like or downloading just the SDKs alone and seeing the samples.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loren's Mom</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/01/is-there-a-recipe-for-success-in-mobile-app-stores/comment-page-1/#comment-2452707</link>
		<dc:creator>Loren's Mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 18:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=21616#comment-2452707</guid>
		<description>This article is worse factually than the tech articles I find in my local newspaper, right next to the church bulletin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is worse factually than the tech articles I find in my local newspaper, right next to the church bulletin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlogReader</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/01/is-there-a-recipe-for-success-in-mobile-app-stores/comment-page-1/#comment-2452666</link>
		<dc:creator>BlogReader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 18:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=21616#comment-2452666</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;RIM doesn’t have an app store. They have an alliance partnership program which basically means they help distribute apps from those developers that become alliance partners. &lt;/i&gt;

They don't have an app store but are working on it internally.  Why does RIM insist on doing work themselves is beyong me.  For example they are writing their own bug tracking software when there are dozens of free and commercial ones.  Their own home grown "app store" will likely be a dud.

RIM should figure out what it is doing and just stick to that, and that is making phones.  And they should fire whomever is in charge of OS upgrades for them -- have you ever upgraded the OS on a BB?  Can you?  Contact your carrier?  Your what?  Apple is making all these problems go away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>RIM doesn’t have an app store. They have an alliance partnership program which basically means they help distribute apps from those developers that become alliance partners. </i></p>
<p>They don&#8217;t have an app store but are working on it internally.  Why does RIM insist on doing work themselves is beyong me.  For example they are writing their own bug tracking software when there are dozens of free and commercial ones.  Their own home grown &#8220;app store&#8221; will likely be a dud.</p>
<p>RIM should figure out what it is doing and just stick to that, and that is making phones.  And they should fire whomever is in charge of OS upgrades for them &#8212; have you ever upgraded the OS on a BB?  Can you?  Contact your carrier?  Your what?  Apple is making all these problems go away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlogReader</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/01/is-there-a-recipe-for-success-in-mobile-app-stores/comment-page-1/#comment-2452664</link>
		<dc:creator>BlogReader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 18:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=21616#comment-2452664</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; What exactly does the development environment and sdk downloadable from their site count as then?&lt;/i&gt;

A piece of junk?  Their IDE is a complete joke and their Eclipse "plugin" isn't a plugin at all but a port of their junky IDE into Eclipse.  It is probably the worst IDE out on the market</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> What exactly does the development environment and sdk downloadable from their site count as then?</i></p>
<p>A piece of junk?  Their IDE is a complete joke and their Eclipse &#8220;plugin&#8221; isn&#8217;t a plugin at all but a port of their junky IDE into Eclipse.  It is probably the worst IDE out on the market</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/01/is-there-a-recipe-for-success-in-mobile-app-stores/comment-page-1/#comment-2452653</link>
		<dc:creator>J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 17:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=21616#comment-2452653</guid>
		<description>Don,

Can all iPhone apps be downloaded OTA?

How do you quantify easy? I downloaded MLB Game Day on my Blackberry a few weeks ago and it took 3 clicks and entering my user/pass. That included paying for the application service fee and linking it to my MLB.com account.

I also just downloaded Google Talk on my BB in two clicks, and it took all of 30 seconds. That's pretty easy.

Finally, I'm no Microsoft fanboy, but Windows Mobile isn't popular? By one measure, Windows Mobile is 3 times as popular as RIM and Apple combined! (http://wmpoweruser.com/?p=538) Now, true, Windows Mobile doesn't have one killer device (neither does RIM/Blackberry -- or Apple anymore for that matter) but at best, Windows Mobile should be NA, because they don't create any hardware that I know of, only software.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don,</p>
<p>Can all iPhone apps be downloaded OTA?</p>
<p>How do you quantify easy? I downloaded MLB Game Day on my Blackberry a few weeks ago and it took 3 clicks and entering my user/pass. That included paying for the application service fee and linking it to my MLB.com account.</p>
<p>I also just downloaded Google Talk on my BB in two clicks, and it took all of 30 seconds. That&#8217;s pretty easy.</p>
<p>Finally, I&#8217;m no Microsoft fanboy, but Windows Mobile isn&#8217;t popular? By one measure, Windows Mobile is 3 times as popular as RIM and Apple combined! (http://wmpoweruser.com/?p=538) Now, true, Windows Mobile doesn&#8217;t have one killer device (neither does RIM/Blackberry &#8212; or Apple anymore for that matter) but at best, Windows Mobile should be NA, because they don&#8217;t create any hardware that I know of, only software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lovehater</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/01/is-there-a-recipe-for-success-in-mobile-app-stores/comment-page-1/#comment-2452651</link>
		<dc:creator>Lovehater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 17:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=21616#comment-2452651</guid>
		<description>"powerful sdk"? Don't get me wrong I love my iphone but from a devoloper stand point window moblie and rim have much better sdks that you take advantage of all the features of the phone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;powerful sdk&#8221;? Don&#8217;t get me wrong I love my iphone but from a devoloper stand point window moblie and rim have much better sdks that you take advantage of all the features of the phone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas E</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/01/is-there-a-recipe-for-success-in-mobile-app-stores/comment-page-1/#comment-2452649</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 17:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=21616#comment-2452649</guid>
		<description>Indeed.. I would echo the sibling comments. You really gave away a lot with that statement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed.. I would echo the sibling comments. You really gave away a lot with that statement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.162 seconds -->
