<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Transcoding Is Not A Crime, Says Court In Veoh Porn Case</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/27/transcoding-is-not-a-crime-says-court-in-veoh-porn-case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/27/transcoding-is-not-a-crime-says-court-in-veoh-porn-case/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:12:14 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: chudai gand lund</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/27/transcoding-is-not-a-crime-says-court-in-veoh-porn-case/comment-page-1/#comment-3034622</link>
		<dc:creator>chudai gand lund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 07:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=21500#comment-3034622</guid>
		<description>i thought its a big crime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i thought its a big crime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Point, Veoh. Court Upholds DMCA Protections In Suit Brought Against It By UMG.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/27/transcoding-is-not-a-crime-says-court-in-veoh-porn-case/comment-page-1/#comment-2585837</link>
		<dc:creator>Point, Veoh. Court Upholds DMCA Protections In Suit Brought Against It By UMG.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 00:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=21500#comment-2585837</guid>
		<description>[...] a summary judgment has been denied to a company trying to sue Veoh for copyright infringement. (The last time it was a porn company). These orders are setting important legal precedents not just for Veoh, but [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a summary judgment has been denied to a company trying to sue Veoh for copyright infringement. (The last time it was a porn company). These orders are setting important legal precedents not just for Veoh, but [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ivan valente</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/27/transcoding-is-not-a-crime-says-court-in-veoh-porn-case/comment-page-1/#comment-2481647</link>
		<dc:creator>ivan valente</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 18:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=21500#comment-2481647</guid>
		<description>fucks sapo pt,terra tv,troca-troca tv,panico tv,disponivel tv gay,portugay tv and manhunt!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fucks sapo pt,terra tv,troca-troca tv,panico tv,disponivel tv gay,portugay tv and manhunt!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sobre a hospedagem de conteúdo de terceiros &#171; MLOG</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/27/transcoding-is-not-a-crime-says-court-in-veoh-porn-case/comment-page-1/#comment-2465561</link>
		<dc:creator>Sobre a hospedagem de conteúdo de terceiros &#171; MLOG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 13:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=21500#comment-2465561</guid>
		<description>[...] propriedade da empresa de “entretenimento adulto” IO Group. O caso completo pode ser acessado aqui. Além do impacto óbvio para o Veoh, a decisão favorece também o YouTube, seu primo mais [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] propriedade da empresa de “entretenimento adulto” IO Group. O caso completo pode ser acessado aqui. Além do impacto óbvio para o Veoh, a decisão favorece também o YouTube, seu primo mais [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transcoding is legal &#171; Internet Scofflaw</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/27/transcoding-is-not-a-crime-says-court-in-veoh-porn-case/comment-page-1/#comment-2451998</link>
		<dc:creator>Transcoding is legal &#171; Internet Scofflaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 18:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=21500#comment-2451998</guid>
		<description>[...] is&#160;legal  A federal judge has ruled that converting video from one format to another cannot be, in itself, copyright infringement.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is&nbsp;legal  A federal judge has ruled that converting video from one format to another cannot be, in itself, copyright infringement.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Court Ruling In Veoh Case Could Be A Big Boost To YouTube Over Viacom &#124; CyberLaw Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/27/transcoding-is-not-a-crime-says-court-in-veoh-porn-case/comment-page-1/#comment-2451873</link>
		<dc:creator>Court Ruling In Veoh Case Could Be A Big Boost To YouTube Over Viacom &#124; CyberLaw Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 13:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=21500#comment-2451873</guid>
		<description>[...] often transcoding the content from one format into flash. However, the judge in the Veoh case trashed that argument pretty easily:  Here, Veoh has simply established a system whereby software automatically processes [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] often transcoding the content from one format into flash. However, the judge in the Veoh case trashed that argument pretty easily:  Here, Veoh has simply established a system whereby software automatically processes [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veoh non è responsabile dei propri utenti &#171; GmG&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/27/transcoding-is-not-a-crime-says-court-in-veoh-porn-case/comment-page-1/#comment-2451258</link>
		<dc:creator>Veoh non è responsabile dei propri utenti &#171; GmG&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 07:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=21500#comment-2451258</guid>
		<description>[...] converte in formato flash i file caricati dagli utenti e ne crea delle anteprime. Il giudice Lloyd ha convenuto con Veoh: si tratta di un procedimento automatico messo a disposizione dei netizen. Il servizio di sharing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] converte in formato flash i file caricati dagli utenti e ne crea delle anteprime. Il giudice Lloyd ha convenuto con Veoh: si tratta di un procedimento automatico messo a disposizione dei netizen. Il servizio di sharing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: U.S. Court Decision Good News For Online Video Sites</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/27/transcoding-is-not-a-crime-says-court-in-veoh-porn-case/comment-page-1/#comment-2451197</link>
		<dc:creator>U.S. Court Decision Good News For Online Video Sites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 04:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=21500#comment-2451197</guid>
		<description>[...] Michael Arrington, &#8220;Transcoding Is Not A Crime, Says Court In Veoh Porn Case&#8221;, TechCrunc..., Michael Arrington, &#8220;What The Veoh Decision Means For YouTube And Others&#8221;, TechCrunch, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michael Arrington, &#8220;Transcoding Is Not A Crime, Says Court In Veoh Porn Case&#8221;, TechCrunc&#8230;, Michael Arrington, &#8220;What The Veoh Decision Means For YouTube And Others&#8221;, TechCrunch, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LegalEagle</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/27/transcoding-is-not-a-crime-says-court-in-veoh-porn-case/comment-page-1/#comment-2450836</link>
		<dc:creator>LegalEagle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 18:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=21500#comment-2450836</guid>
		<description>Whoa, how come no one is reporting that fact that this is NOT a judicial opinion with any precedential value.  This was a decision by a magistrate -- which is sort of a judge&#039;s assistant.  No other court is going to be bound by this, and it may not even be published in the official reports of decisions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoa, how come no one is reporting that fact that this is NOT a judicial opinion with any precedential value.  This was a decision by a magistrate &#8212; which is sort of a judge&#8217;s assistant.  No other court is going to be bound by this, and it may not even be published in the official reports of decisions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: metavital's me2DAY</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/27/transcoding-is-not-a-crime-says-court-in-veoh-porn-case/comment-page-1/#comment-2450770</link>
		<dc:creator>metavital's me2DAY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 17:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=21500#comment-2450770</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;meta의 생각...&lt;/strong&gt;

최근 저작권 침해 소송에서 승소한 Veoh의 사례가 무엇을 의미하는지 간략히 알아보자면……...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>meta의 생각&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>최근 저작권 침해 소송에서 승소한 Veoh의 사례가 무엇을 의미하는지 간략히 알아보자면……&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veoh Wins Copyright Infringement Case &#124; Any Impact On Viacom Vs YouTube Lawsuit? &#187; Web TV Wire</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/27/transcoding-is-not-a-crime-says-court-in-veoh-porn-case/comment-page-1/#comment-2450201</link>
		<dc:creator>Veoh Wins Copyright Infringement Case &#124; Any Impact On Viacom Vs YouTube Lawsuit? &#187; Web TV Wire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 03:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=21500#comment-2450201</guid>
		<description>[...] to TechCrunch, Judge Howard Lloyd [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to TechCrunch, Judge Howard Lloyd [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2008-08-28 &#171; 個人的な雑記</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/27/transcoding-is-not-a-crime-says-court-in-veoh-porn-case/comment-page-1/#comment-2449926</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2008-08-28 &#171; 個人的な雑記</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 22:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=21500#comment-2449926</guid>
		<description>[...] Transcoding Is Not A Crime, Says Court In Veoh Porn Case (tags: copyright law veoh videos) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Transcoding Is Not A Crime, Says Court In Veoh Porn Case (tags: copyright law veoh videos) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2008-08-28 &#171; 個人的な雑記</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/27/transcoding-is-not-a-crime-says-court-in-veoh-porn-case/comment-page-1/#comment-2449925</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2008-08-28 &#171; 個人的な雑記</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 22:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=21500#comment-2449925</guid>
		<description>[...] Transcoding Is Not A Crime, Says Court In Veoh Porn Case (tags: copyright law veoh videos) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Transcoding Is Not A Crime, Says Court In Veoh Porn Case (tags: copyright law veoh videos) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transcoding is NOT a Crime! &#124; David Ortez</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/27/transcoding-is-not-a-crime-says-court-in-veoh-porn-case/comment-page-1/#comment-2449915</link>
		<dc:creator>Transcoding is NOT a Crime! &#124; David Ortez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 21:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=21500#comment-2449915</guid>
		<description>[...] Michael Arrington states it best, “Finally, a judge who may have actually visited the Internet once or twice before deciding a case.” I concur. The Internet may seem like the Wild West but it seems that a pragmatic and logical approach can be applied to the evolving ethical, moral and legal dilemmas that arise. Arrington further entertains the impact of the Veoh decision and offers his interpretation of how online video sites may protect them selves in the future. In my opinion, linking to content that may potentially infringe on the copyright of a product should not be illegal. Before we know it . . . the Thought Police will be out and just thinking about downloading something will land you in jail. If you liked this post, you can buy me a coffee! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michael Arrington states it best, “Finally, a judge who may have actually visited the Internet once or twice before deciding a case.” I concur. The Internet may seem like the Wild West but it seems that a pragmatic and logical approach can be applied to the evolving ethical, moral and legal dilemmas that arise. Arrington further entertains the impact of the Veoh decision and offers his interpretation of how online video sites may protect them selves in the future. In my opinion, linking to content that may potentially infringe on the copyright of a product should not be illegal. Before we know it . . . the Thought Police will be out and just thinking about downloading something will land you in jail. If you liked this post, you can buy me a coffee! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fair Electronic Use &#187; Judge Defends DMCA, Veoh Prevails in Lawsuit</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/27/transcoding-is-not-a-crime-says-court-in-veoh-porn-case/comment-page-1/#comment-2449447</link>
		<dc:creator>Fair Electronic Use &#187; Judge Defends DMCA, Veoh Prevails in Lawsuit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=21500#comment-2449447</guid>
		<description>[...] Transcoding files to Flash format does not put the files in the site’s control; they are still protected by the DMCA safe harbor (see previous post). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Transcoding files to Flash format does not put the files in the site’s control; they are still protected by the DMCA safe harbor (see previous post). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: News Bits: Veoh Wins DMCA Case &#171; The Social Graph</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/27/transcoding-is-not-a-crime-says-court-in-veoh-porn-case/comment-page-1/#comment-2449437</link>
		<dc:creator>News Bits: Veoh Wins DMCA Case &#171; The Social Graph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=21500#comment-2449437</guid>
		<description>[...] The decision from U.S. District Court judge Howard Lloyd ruled against adult entertainment company IO Group, which had charged Veoh with copyright infringement after video clips from several of its movies appeared on the Veoh site. The key finding in the decision, according to TechCrunch, is Lloyd&#8217;s ruling that transcoding isn&#8217;t a crime. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The decision from U.S. District Court judge Howard Lloyd ruled against adult entertainment company IO Group, which had charged Veoh with copyright infringement after video clips from several of its movies appeared on the Veoh site. The key finding in the decision, according to TechCrunch, is Lloyd&#8217;s ruling that transcoding isn&#8217;t a crime. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: News Bits: Veoh Wins DMCA Case &#171; mtippett</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/27/transcoding-is-not-a-crime-says-court-in-veoh-porn-case/comment-page-1/#comment-2449432</link>
		<dc:creator>News Bits: Veoh Wins DMCA Case &#171; mtippett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=21500#comment-2449432</guid>
		<description>[...] The decision from U.S. District Court judge Howard Lloyd ruled against adult entertainment company IO Group, which had charged Veoh with copyright infringement after video clips from several of its movies appeared on the Veoh site. The key finding in the decision, according to TechCrunch, is Lloyd&#8217;s ruling that transcoding isn&#8217;t a crime. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The decision from U.S. District Court judge Howard Lloyd ruled against adult entertainment company IO Group, which had charged Veoh with copyright infringement after video clips from several of its movies appeared on the Veoh site. The key finding in the decision, according to TechCrunch, is Lloyd&#8217;s ruling that transcoding isn&#8217;t a crime. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Telecom Policy Blog Aggregator &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Court Ruling In Veoh Case Could Be A Big Boost To YouTube Over Viacom</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/27/transcoding-is-not-a-crime-says-court-in-veoh-porn-case/comment-page-1/#comment-2449315</link>
		<dc:creator>Telecom Policy Blog Aggregator &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Court Ruling In Veoh Case Could Be A Big Boost To YouTube Over Viacom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=21500#comment-2449315</guid>
		<description>[...] often transcoding the content from one format into flash. However, the judge in the Veoh case trashed that argument pretty easily:  Here, Veoh has simply established a system whereby software automatically processes [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] often transcoding the content from one format into flash. However, the judge in the Veoh case trashed that argument pretty easily:  Here, Veoh has simply established a system whereby software automatically processes [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/27/transcoding-is-not-a-crime-says-court-in-veoh-porn-case/comment-page-1/#comment-2449308</link>
		<dc:creator>G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=21500#comment-2449308</guid>
		<description>The only point the judement makes is telling copyright holders to present facts and not show up in court with nothing but four letters sketched on a placard “DMCA” .  If you read through it - the judge merely asked the plaintiff to present facts and only reason Veoh got a summary judgement.  Viacom and others will be arriving in court with thousands of pieces of documentation - and this decision will in no way impact Viacom’s case against Google.  Had this been about anything other than the DMCA, news like this would not even make it to the classified section of a decent newspaper..

Let&#039;s be honest here Michael (you are an attorney yourself) - given how this played out, ending in Summary Judgement in favor of the defendant - we all know this was a sloppy rent-a-desk bunch of lawyer(s) representing IO.   

As for the legal team at Google putting out their &quot;design contest for victory signs&quot; - someone there better corral those boys and snap them out of it.  The games have not even started yet - hell - it ain&#039;t even the opening cermonies when it comes to the Viacom-Google duel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only point the judement makes is telling copyright holders to present facts and not show up in court with nothing but four letters sketched on a placard “DMCA” .  If you read through it &#8211; the judge merely asked the plaintiff to present facts and only reason Veoh got a summary judgement.  Viacom and others will be arriving in court with thousands of pieces of documentation &#8211; and this decision will in no way impact Viacom’s case against Google.  Had this been about anything other than the DMCA, news like this would not even make it to the classified section of a decent newspaper..</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s be honest here Michael (you are an attorney yourself) &#8211; given how this played out, ending in Summary Judgement in favor of the defendant &#8211; we all know this was a sloppy rent-a-desk bunch of lawyer(s) representing IO.   </p>
<p>As for the legal team at Google putting out their &#8220;design contest for victory signs&#8221; &#8211; someone there better corral those boys and snap them out of it.  The games have not even started yet &#8211; hell &#8211; it ain&#8217;t even the opening cermonies when it comes to the Viacom-Google duel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pull YouTube clips? Or monetize them? - Lost Remote TV Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/27/transcoding-is-not-a-crime-says-court-in-veoh-porn-case/comment-page-1/#comment-2449301</link>
		<dc:creator>Pull YouTube clips? Or monetize them? - Lost Remote TV Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=21500#comment-2449301</guid>
		<description>[...] Related: Court sides with Veoh in porn video lawsuit [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Related: Court sides with Veoh in porn video lawsuit [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Court Ruling In Veoh Case Could Be A Big Boost To YouTube Over Viacom &#124; bitbucket.kylewelsh.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/27/transcoding-is-not-a-crime-says-court-in-veoh-porn-case/comment-page-1/#comment-2449273</link>
		<dc:creator>Court Ruling In Veoh Case Could Be A Big Boost To YouTube Over Viacom &#124; bitbucket.kylewelsh.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=21500#comment-2449273</guid>
		<description>[...] often transcoding the content from one format into flash. However, the judge in the Veoh case trashed that argument pretty easily:  Here, Veoh has simply established a system whereby software automatically processes [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] often transcoding the content from one format into flash. However, the judge in the Veoh case trashed that argument pretty easily:  Here, Veoh has simply established a system whereby software automatically processes [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech Scoop - Hot Technology Gossip &#187; Court Ruling In Veoh Case Could Be A Big Boost To YouTube Over Viacom</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/27/transcoding-is-not-a-crime-says-court-in-veoh-porn-case/comment-page-1/#comment-2449268</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech Scoop - Hot Technology Gossip &#187; Court Ruling In Veoh Case Could Be A Big Boost To YouTube Over Viacom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=21500#comment-2449268</guid>
		<description>[...] often transcoding the content from one format into flash. However, the judge in the Veoh case trashed that argument pretty easily:  Here, Veoh has simply established a system whereby software automatically processes [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] often transcoding the content from one format into flash. However, the judge in the Veoh case trashed that argument pretty easily:  Here, Veoh has simply established a system whereby software automatically processes [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Court Ruling In Veoh Case Could Be A Big Boost To YouTube Over Viacom &#124; Technology Update News</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/27/transcoding-is-not-a-crime-says-court-in-veoh-porn-case/comment-page-1/#comment-2449263</link>
		<dc:creator>Court Ruling In Veoh Case Could Be A Big Boost To YouTube Over Viacom &#124; Technology Update News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=21500#comment-2449263</guid>
		<description>[...] often transcoding the content from one format into flash. However, the judge in the Veoh case trashed that argument pretty easily:  Here, Veoh has simply established a system whereby software automatically processes [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] often transcoding the content from one format into flash. However, the judge in the Veoh case trashed that argument pretty easily:  Here, Veoh has simply established a system whereby software automatically processes [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DMCA safe harbor protects Veoh online video sharing &#8212; major victory that may help YouTube &#171; The Utube Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/27/transcoding-is-not-a-crime-says-court-in-veoh-porn-case/comment-page-1/#comment-2449222</link>
		<dc:creator>DMCA safe harbor protects Veoh online video sharing &#8212; major victory that may help YouTube &#171; The Utube Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=21500#comment-2449222</guid>
		<description>[...] the DMCA safe harbor.  Michael Arrington of Tech Crunch has 2 excellent analyses of the decision here and here.  One of the key parts of the ruling is that a video sharing site does not become [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the DMCA safe harbor.  Michael Arrington of Tech Crunch has 2 excellent analyses of the decision here and here.  One of the key parts of the ruling is that a video sharing site does not become [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Media and DMCA - once again Porn shows the way ? &#124; Strategist.org.uk</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/27/transcoding-is-not-a-crime-says-court-in-veoh-porn-case/comment-page-1/#comment-2449180</link>
		<dc:creator>New Media and DMCA - once again Porn shows the way ? &#124; Strategist.org.uk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 12:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=21500#comment-2449180</guid>
		<description>[...] now it looks like its forging the way in determining how this issue will evolve - from TechCrunch:  &#8230;the U.S. District Court in the Northern District of California, threw out adult [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] now it looks like its forging the way in determining how this issue will evolve &#8211; from TechCrunch:  &#8230;the U.S. District Court in the Northern District of California, threw out adult [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
