<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Time Warner Ready To Unload AOL In Pieces.  But At What Price?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/04/time-warner-ready-to-unload-aol-in-pieces-but-at-what-price/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/04/time-warner-ready-to-unload-aol-in-pieces-but-at-what-price/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 18:16:49 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: pligg.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/04/time-warner-ready-to-unload-aol-in-pieces-but-at-what-price/comment-page-1/#comment-2429550</link>
		<dc:creator>pligg.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 18:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20699#comment-2429550</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Time Warner Ready To Unload AOL In Pieces.  But At What Price?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Time Warner has completed the internal work necessary to separate its AOL unit&#039;s dial-up-access business from its advertising and content business. Now it will get serious about plotting the Internet unit&#039;s next steps....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Time Warner Ready To Unload AOL In Pieces.  But At What Price?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Time Warner has completed the internal work necessary to separate its AOL unit&#8217;s dial-up-access business from its advertising and content business. Now it will get serious about plotting the Internet unit&#8217;s next steps&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Time Warner Sells AOL, Delicious Relaunches, Sitemeter vs. Internet Explorer, Textnovel, CSS Optimizer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/04/time-warner-ready-to-unload-aol-in-pieces-but-at-what-price/comment-page-1/#comment-2429236</link>
		<dc:creator>Time Warner Sells AOL, Delicious Relaunches, Sitemeter vs. Internet Explorer, Textnovel, CSS Optimizer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 12:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20699#comment-2429236</guid>
		<description>[...] AOL that you know might become a thing of the past. Media giant Time Warner is looking to sell off the technology concern in &#8220;about three to four pieces.&#8221; Both Yahoo and Microsoft are have shown interest in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] AOL that you know might become a thing of the past. Media giant Time Warner is looking to sell off the technology concern in &#8220;about three to four pieces.&#8221; Both Yahoo and Microsoft are have shown interest in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: microboo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/04/time-warner-ready-to-unload-aol-in-pieces-but-at-what-price/comment-page-1/#comment-2428883</link>
		<dc:creator>microboo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 01:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20699#comment-2428883</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll take that bet. Noscript + Ad Blocker Plus = No ads. Ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll take that bet. Noscript + Ad Blocker Plus = No ads. Ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kawika Holbrook</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/04/time-warner-ready-to-unload-aol-in-pieces-but-at-what-price/comment-page-1/#comment-2428269</link>
		<dc:creator>Kawika Holbrook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 16:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20699#comment-2428269</guid>
		<description>Normally, I&#039;d agree. However, if IM traffic also becomes microblogging (a-la Twitter), and if those microblog pages have conversations (a-la FriendFeed), and if those pages have text or display ads, then -- perhaps -- the traffic isn&#039;t as much of a waste as might be imagined.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Normally, I&#8217;d agree. However, if IM traffic also becomes microblogging (a-la Twitter), and if those microblog pages have conversations (a-la FriendFeed), and if those pages have text or display ads, then &#8212; perhaps &#8212; the traffic isn&#8217;t as much of a waste as might be imagined.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Barnes</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/04/time-warner-ready-to-unload-aol-in-pieces-but-at-what-price/comment-page-1/#comment-2428219</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Barnes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 15:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20699#comment-2428219</guid>
		<description>If Earthlink is a monopsony in this situation, why should they pay more than $1.38 USD for part of AOL?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Earthlink is a monopsony in this situation, why should they pay more than $1.38 USD for part of AOL?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RealityLocator.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/04/time-warner-ready-to-unload-aol-in-pieces-but-at-what-price/comment-page-1/#comment-2428211</link>
		<dc:creator>RealityLocator.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 15:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20699#comment-2428211</guid>
		<description>a media company selling off its digital media assets. makes you wonder.  obviously there is no light at the end of the AOL tunnel.  

thank god no more AOL spam cd&#039;s in the mail. 

 imagine they just bought bebo for 850 million cash and now they want to sell.  who the hell is in charge over there.  the sooner they disappear off the radar the better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a media company selling off its digital media assets. makes you wonder.  obviously there is no light at the end of the AOL tunnel.  </p>
<p>thank god no more AOL spam cd&#8217;s in the mail. </p>
<p> imagine they just bought bebo for 850 million cash and now they want to sell.  who the hell is in charge over there.  the sooner they disappear off the radar the better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucas</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/04/time-warner-ready-to-unload-aol-in-pieces-but-at-what-price/comment-page-1/#comment-2428197</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 14:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20699#comment-2428197</guid>
		<description>Wait a minute - is this still the AOL Time Warner that owns Warner Bros? The studio that just released The Dark Knight?

I remember watching this &quot;historic&quot; merger happening on TV in the middle of dotcom crazy time. This is really crazy! 

Jerry - you stick to your guns, you can&#039;t do any worse than these guys.

As usual Erick, another fascinating story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait a minute &#8211; is this still the AOL Time Warner that owns Warner Bros? The studio that just released The Dark Knight?</p>
<p>I remember watching this &#8220;historic&#8221; merger happening on TV in the middle of dotcom crazy time. This is really crazy! </p>
<p>Jerry &#8211; you stick to your guns, you can&#8217;t do any worse than these guys.</p>
<p>As usual Erick, another fascinating story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whisperer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/04/time-warner-ready-to-unload-aol-in-pieces-but-at-what-price/comment-page-1/#comment-2428192</link>
		<dc:creator>whisperer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 14:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20699#comment-2428192</guid>
		<description>@kk

This kind of information is critical to conversations ar TC where bloggers and posters alike tend to assume that the entire world is just a Super-Sized Silicon Valley, in this case, a place where everyone who is anyone has a choice of high speed access options.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@kk</p>
<p>This kind of information is critical to conversations ar TC where bloggers and posters alike tend to assume that the entire world is just a Super-Sized Silicon Valley, in this case, a place where everyone who is anyone has a choice of high speed access options.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kk</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/04/time-warner-ready-to-unload-aol-in-pieces-but-at-what-price/comment-page-1/#comment-2428187</link>
		<dc:creator>kk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 14:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20699#comment-2428187</guid>
		<description>@ Michelle

Yes there is in some areas of the country DSL &amp; Cable are not available and your only options are either Dial up or Satelite and Satelite cost like 400% more than DSL and Cable so you guess which people rural areas will pick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Michelle</p>
<p>Yes there is in some areas of the country DSL &amp; Cable are not available and your only options are either Dial up or Satelite and Satelite cost like 400% more than DSL and Cable so you guess which people rural areas will pick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TaT: StudiVZ-Interview, Interview mit Ron, AdShadow, AOL-Verkauf?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/04/time-warner-ready-to-unload-aol-in-pieces-but-at-what-price/comment-page-1/#comment-2428172</link>
		<dc:creator>TaT: StudiVZ-Interview, Interview mit Ron, AdShadow, AOL-Verkauf?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 14:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20699#comment-2428172</guid>
		<description>[...] AOL vor dem Verkauf? - Die haben ja kürzlich erst einen Haufen Geld für Bebo rausgeschmissen &#8230; Techcrunch ist der Meinung, das Time Warner schon froh sein könnte wenn man 7 Mrd. $ für AOL reinbekommen könnte.    Noch kein Kommentar    Noch kein Kommentar &#187; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] AOL vor dem Verkauf? &#8211; Die haben ja kürzlich erst einen Haufen Geld für Bebo rausgeschmissen &#8230; Techcrunch ist der Meinung, das Time Warner schon froh sein könnte wenn man 7 Mrd. $ für AOL reinbekommen könnte.    Noch kein Kommentar    Noch kein Kommentar &raquo; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TECHFLOCK</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/04/time-warner-ready-to-unload-aol-in-pieces-but-at-what-price/comment-page-1/#comment-2428164</link>
		<dc:creator>TECHFLOCK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 14:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20699#comment-2428164</guid>
		<description>Hmm .. how much did M$ pay for aQuantive whatever ? what was the reach that had ? Don&#039;t see it in the Top 10 list above . advertising.com is the killer asset that M$ will bid for .. yahoo + aol will make a killer combination in the ad market and can take on google + doubleclick .. so expecting a minimum of 10 billion$ for ad business. the content business is decent enough for 2-3 billion and dial up .. i hear earthlink has 3.3 million subscribers .. aol still has approx 8 million .. so make that another 3-4 billion .. i am looking at 15 billion or more...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm .. how much did M$ pay for aQuantive whatever ? what was the reach that had ? Don&#8217;t see it in the Top 10 list above . advertising.com is the killer asset that M$ will bid for .. yahoo + aol will make a killer combination in the ad market and can take on google + doubleclick .. so expecting a minimum of 10 billion$ for ad business. the content business is decent enough for 2-3 billion and dial up .. i hear earthlink has 3.3 million subscribers .. aol still has approx 8 million .. so make that another 3-4 billion .. i am looking at 15 billion or more&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malik Aleem Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/04/time-warner-ready-to-unload-aol-in-pieces-but-at-what-price/comment-page-1/#comment-2428159</link>
		<dc:creator>Malik Aleem Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 13:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20699#comment-2428159</guid>
		<description>Being the a bigger player, microsoft is more likely to buy AOL as they want a bigger share in the online content and ad business. Yahoo is still into the business and if microsoft is trying to buy it too then it also leads to the conclusion microsoft would be the no. 1 bidder.. But how much would they bid?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being the a bigger player, microsoft is more likely to buy AOL as they want a bigger share in the online content and ad business. Yahoo is still into the business and if microsoft is trying to buy it too then it also leads to the conclusion microsoft would be the no. 1 bidder.. But how much would they bid?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pasan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/04/time-warner-ready-to-unload-aol-in-pieces-but-at-what-price/comment-page-1/#comment-2428144</link>
		<dc:creator>pasan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 13:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20699#comment-2428144</guid>
		<description>AOL has three things that Yahoo should prize:

(1) Lots of traffic including search queries
(2) Lots of proprietary content
(3) Killer advertising assets under Platform A that any of the major Internet companies would love to have: Ad.com, Quigo, Tacoda &amp; Adtech.

Yahoo should buy them but they seem to whiff in most M&amp;A discussions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AOL has three things that Yahoo should prize:</p>
<p>(1) Lots of traffic including search queries<br />
(2) Lots of proprietary content<br />
(3) Killer advertising assets under Platform A that any of the major Internet companies would love to have: Ad.com, Quigo, Tacoda &amp; Adtech.</p>
<p>Yahoo should buy them but they seem to whiff in most M&amp;A discussions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Osborn</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/04/time-warner-ready-to-unload-aol-in-pieces-but-at-what-price/comment-page-1/#comment-2428137</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Osborn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 13:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20699#comment-2428137</guid>
		<description>Exactly. IM traffic is pretty much a waste of an investment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly. IM traffic is pretty much a waste of an investment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicki B.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/04/time-warner-ready-to-unload-aol-in-pieces-but-at-what-price/comment-page-1/#comment-2428134</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicki B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 13:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20699#comment-2428134</guid>
		<description>Well, I meant more the dial-up service they offer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I meant more the dial-up service they offer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle McCormack</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/04/time-warner-ready-to-unload-aol-in-pieces-but-at-what-price/comment-page-1/#comment-2428133</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle McCormack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 13:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20699#comment-2428133</guid>
		<description>Is there really still a &#039;dial up&#039; business?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there really still a &#8216;dial up&#8217; business?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It's all in the numbers</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/04/time-warner-ready-to-unload-aol-in-pieces-but-at-what-price/comment-page-1/#comment-2428130</link>
		<dc:creator>It's all in the numbers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 13:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20699#comment-2428130</guid>
		<description>No one has monetized IM traffic - it is as worthless as social network inventory.  Need to let go of &quot;AIM is huge&quot; - SMS and wall posts have all the momentum...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one has monetized IM traffic &#8211; it is as worthless as social network inventory.  Need to let go of &#8220;AIM is huge&#8221; &#8211; SMS and wall posts have all the momentum&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Cerm</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/04/time-warner-ready-to-unload-aol-in-pieces-but-at-what-price/comment-page-1/#comment-2428129</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Cerm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 12:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20699#comment-2428129</guid>
		<description>AOL still provides me with the same email address that I&#039;ve had since I first got internet access in 1995-ish.  I switched to Gmail 3 years ago, but I still keep it around because it&#039;s free, and there are some people who only have that address, and AOL has had IMAP support forever (so I haven&#039;t use their horrendous software in years).  

It&#039;s hard to believe that AOL was once synonymous with the internet in the minds of most people.  Soon, the only sign that they ever existed will be AIM, which still has a stranglehold on the US market (though SMS has mostly replaced IM as the way kids inanely communicate).

AOL was the Google of the &#039;90s.  It&#039;s tough to imagine a future without Google, but anyone would have said the same about AOL in &#039;96.  It makes you wonder what other big companies today will be in the dustbin in 10 years (other than Yahoo!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AOL still provides me with the same email address that I&#8217;ve had since I first got internet access in 1995-ish.  I switched to Gmail 3 years ago, but I still keep it around because it&#8217;s free, and there are some people who only have that address, and AOL has had IMAP support forever (so I haven&#8217;t use their horrendous software in years).  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s hard to believe that AOL was once synonymous with the internet in the minds of most people.  Soon, the only sign that they ever existed will be AIM, which still has a stranglehold on the US market (though SMS has mostly replaced IM as the way kids inanely communicate).</p>
<p>AOL was the Google of the &#8217;90s.  It&#8217;s tough to imagine a future without Google, but anyone would have said the same about AOL in &#8216;96.  It makes you wonder what other big companies today will be in the dustbin in 10 years (other than Yahoo!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trae</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/04/time-warner-ready-to-unload-aol-in-pieces-but-at-what-price/comment-page-1/#comment-2428126</link>
		<dc:creator>Trae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 12:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20699#comment-2428126</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s interesting to note here is the Instant Messaging services.  AIM is still one of the most popular instant messaging services.  With a Microsoft purchase will all the AIM users move into MS&#039;s Messenger service?  Same for Yahoo?  Honestly, the consolidation of IMs and the increased market share this might bring sounds to be the most lucrative piece of this whole purchase.

Trae
http://www.traeblain.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s interesting to note here is the Instant Messaging services.  AIM is still one of the most popular instant messaging services.  With a Microsoft purchase will all the AIM users move into MS&#8217;s Messenger service?  Same for Yahoo?  Honestly, the consolidation of IMs and the increased market share this might bring sounds to be the most lucrative piece of this whole purchase.</p>
<p>Trae<br />
<a href="http://www.traeblain.com/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.traeblain.com/'>http://www.traeblain.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It's all in the numbers</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/04/time-warner-ready-to-unload-aol-in-pieces-but-at-what-price/comment-page-1/#comment-2428124</link>
		<dc:creator>It's all in the numbers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 12:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20699#comment-2428124</guid>
		<description>@alex - ... and that view may have earned AOL the royal sum of $.0001 ($1 CPM, 10% margin)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@alex &#8211; &#8230; and that view may have earned AOL the royal sum of $.0001 ($1 CPM, 10% margin)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/04/time-warner-ready-to-unload-aol-in-pieces-but-at-what-price/comment-page-1/#comment-2428115</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 12:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20699#comment-2428115</guid>
		<description>@Nicki B - I&#039;d suspect you&#039;ve seen a platform a served ad at least once already today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Nicki B &#8211; I&#8217;d suspect you&#8217;ve seen a platform a served ad at least once already today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicki B.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/04/time-warner-ready-to-unload-aol-in-pieces-but-at-what-price/comment-page-1/#comment-2428113</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicki B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 12:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20699#comment-2428113</guid>
		<description>There are still people who use AOL?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are still people who use AOL?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mallik</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/04/time-warner-ready-to-unload-aol-in-pieces-but-at-what-price/comment-page-1/#comment-2428110</link>
		<dc:creator>Mallik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 12:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20699#comment-2428110</guid>
		<description>AFter a long yahoo-Microsof saga will it be AOL-Microsoft saga this time ??

Visit http://codeinspections.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AFter a long yahoo-Microsof saga will it be AOL-Microsoft saga this time ??</p>
<p>Visit <a href="http://codeinspections.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://codeinspections.blogspot.com'>http://codeinsp...ns.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boris</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/04/time-warner-ready-to-unload-aol-in-pieces-but-at-what-price/comment-page-1/#comment-2428109</link>
		<dc:creator>boris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 12:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20699#comment-2428109</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.test.ru&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; :) &lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://www.test.ru' rel="nofollow"> <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
