<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do Not Mistype Cuil</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/28/do-not-mistype-cuil/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/28/do-not-mistype-cuil/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 02:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Names and logos: The awkward case of Cuil &#171; Dana&#8217;s user experience blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/28/do-not-mistype-cuil/#comment-2516587</link>
		<dc:creator>Names and logos: The awkward case of Cuil &#171; Dana&#8217;s user experience blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 06:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20527#comment-2516587</guid>
		<description>[...] is worth, I am hardly the first person to notice this&#8211;apparently other misspellings also have unfortunate meanings, though none that are so clearly suggested by the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is worth, I am hardly the first person to notice this&#8211;apparently other misspellings also have unfortunate meanings, though none that are so clearly suggested by the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cogito &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cuil Prodest?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/28/do-not-mistype-cuil/#comment-2425181</link>
		<dc:creator>Cogito &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cuil Prodest?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20527#comment-2425181</guid>
		<description>[...] another competitor for Google is on the market: Cuil (a funny name in Italian :)) plans to fight Google by relying on the high number of indexed pages (120 billion stated so [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] another competitor for Google is on the market: Cuil (a funny name in Italian :)) plans to fight Google by relying on the high number of indexed pages (120 billion stated so [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Czar</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/28/do-not-mistype-cuil/#comment-2423656</link>
		<dc:creator>Czar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 22:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20527#comment-2423656</guid>
		<description>Well, I must say that the launching of Cuil is good news for investors. 1/10 of Google's huh...Well, that's a big saving of bucks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I must say that the launching of Cuil is good news for investors. 1/10 of Google&#8217;s huh&#8230;Well, that&#8217;s a big saving of bucks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Realview TV</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/28/do-not-mistype-cuil/#comment-2423469</link>
		<dc:creator>Realview TV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20527#comment-2423469</guid>
		<description>Huge amounts of traffic already!  Picking out a black surfboard.  Where are the video results?  
-Realview TV</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huge amounts of traffic already!  Picking out a black surfboard.  Where are the video results?<br />
-Realview TV</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uFrik - &#187; Cuil no fué muy bien recibido</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/28/do-not-mistype-cuil/#comment-2423370</link>
		<dc:creator>uFrik - &#187; Cuil no fué muy bien recibido</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20527#comment-2423370</guid>
		<description>[...] los Estado Unidenses no es muy facil pronunciar ni usar &#8220;cuil&#8221; (pronunciado cool) En TechCrunch hubo una persona que escribió culi.com en vez de culi y lo llevo a una página de porno italiana. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] los Estado Unidenses no es muy facil pronunciar ni usar &#8220;cuil&#8221; (pronunciado cool) En TechCrunch hubo una persona que escribió culi.com en vez de culi y lo llevo a una página de porno italiana. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cuil the Media Marvel &#171; The MetaSieve Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/28/do-not-mistype-cuil/#comment-2423278</link>
		<dc:creator>Cuil the Media Marvel &#171; The MetaSieve Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20527#comment-2423278</guid>
		<description>[...] Cuil the Media&#160;Marvel Filed under: Uncategorized &#8212; Tags: Cuil, Debunking, Google, Search &#8212; metasieve @ 5:19 pm   If you were following the news in the last days you could get the impression that the end of Google is imminent. - Cuil Exits Stealth Mode With A Massive Search Engine - Google Beats Cuil Hands Down In Size And Relevance, But That Isn’t The Whole Story - And….Cuil Goes Offline - Do Not Mistype Cuil [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cuil the Media&nbsp;Marvel Filed under: Uncategorized &#8212; Tags: Cuil, Debunking, Google, Search &#8212; metasieve @ 5:19 pm   If you were following the news in the last days you could get the impression that the end of Google is imminent. - Cuil Exits Stealth Mode With A Massive Search Engine - Google Beats Cuil Hands Down In Size And Relevance, But That Isn’t The Whole Story - And….Cuil Goes Offline - Do Not Mistype Cuil [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gonzo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/28/do-not-mistype-cuil/#comment-2423251</link>
		<dc:creator>Gonzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20527#comment-2423251</guid>
		<description>@Qubo
In Spanish it is common to tell a girl "me gusta tu culo" which means "I like your ass."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Qubo<br />
In Spanish it is common to tell a girl &#8220;me gusta tu culo&#8221; which means &#8220;I like your ass.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Qubo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/28/do-not-mistype-cuil/#comment-2423248</link>
		<dc:creator>Qubo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20527#comment-2423248</guid>
		<description>In Spanish CULO means ASS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Spanish CULO means ASS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Black Web 2.0 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cuil is not Cool</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/28/do-not-mistype-cuil/#comment-2423244</link>
		<dc:creator>Black Web 2.0 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cuil is not Cool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20527#comment-2423244</guid>
		<description>[...] to much fanfare, $30 million dollars in venture capital funds, multiple TechCrunch stalkerage, and even CNN frontpage coverage, a former Google exec&#8217;s secret product was officially [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to much fanfare, $30 million dollars in venture capital funds, multiple TechCrunch stalkerage, and even CNN frontpage coverage, a former Google exec&#8217;s secret product was officially [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/28/do-not-mistype-cuil/#comment-2423101</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20527#comment-2423101</guid>
		<description>"But They don’t index the Blogs as fast a Google.com"

In other words, if you are searching for dynamic content your results will likely be irrelevant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But They don’t index the Blogs as fast a Google.com&#8221;</p>
<p>In other words, if you are searching for dynamic content your results will likely be irrelevant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Osita Oo NWOYE</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/28/do-not-mistype-cuil/#comment-2423095</link>
		<dc:creator>Osita Oo NWOYE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20527#comment-2423095</guid>
		<description>I think I like the Idea of a challenger to Google, It favors the users. The layout is impressive and all that. But Cuil failed my first test. CUIL CANNOT FIND ITSELF!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I like the Idea of a challenger to Google, It favors the users. The layout is impressive and all that. But Cuil failed my first test. CUIL CANNOT FIND ITSELF!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cuil: Search That Sucks or: How NOT To Launch A Search Engine :: HTMList.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/28/do-not-mistype-cuil/#comment-2423031</link>
		<dc:creator>Cuil: Search That Sucks or: How NOT To Launch A Search Engine :: HTMList.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20527#comment-2423031</guid>
		<description>[...] Search That Sucks (And for the love of all that is holy, don&#8217;t misspell it!) ids.push(269);   Save and share this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Search That Sucks (And for the love of all that is holy, don&#8217;t misspell it!) ids.push(269);   Save and share this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/28/do-not-mistype-cuil/#comment-2423022</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20527#comment-2423022</guid>
		<description>Odd, I get cnet.com from "I'm feeling lucky".  Seems random, try turning your search history off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Odd, I get cnet.com from &#8220;I&#8217;m feeling lucky&#8221;.  Seems random, try turning your search history off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.C. Butler</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/28/do-not-mistype-cuil/#comment-2422957</link>
		<dc:creator>J.C. Butler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 07:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20527#comment-2422957</guid>
		<description>I agree that we shouldn't necessarily make snap judgments about a new service, and websites need time to grow into their own and work out their kinks.  I have found the same to definitely be true with my own site, and it's really a never ending process.  But if you're going to send out a press release claiming to have one upped Google, you had better be prepared to go head to head lest that press release accomplishes its purpose.

In the case of cuil.com, not only did they get press here, but they were one of the top headlines on cnn.com claiming to be "bigger than Google" before their servers couldn't handle the search load.  The fact is, there aren't really 120 billion web pages that matter (there aren't 40 billion that matter), what's important is that you have relevant and up-to-date info on the ones that do matter.  Google does, Cuil doesn't.  I run one of the largest sites in the Middle East, all of the major search engines index our pages daily, Cuil hasn't been there for at least 2 weeks.  Many of the (random and not necessarily relevant) pages of ours that they've indexed no longer exist.  The comments above about searching cuil on google vs. searching it on cuil ironically proves that very point.

The headlines will forget about cuil tomorrow (if not today), and they will probably have to dethrone one of the top three search engines before any major media risks giving them any press again.  What's worse, however, is that they had a shot with a few million customers expecting to see something un-imaginable, something better than Google!  And I'd be surprised if even one of those users walked away feeling that their expectations had been met.  Cuil may have a great idea, a great product, and the perfect algorithm, but they hatched a preemie and instantly made their job a whole lot harder, if not impossible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that we shouldn&#8217;t necessarily make snap judgments about a new service, and websites need time to grow into their own and work out their kinks.  I have found the same to definitely be true with my own site, and it&#8217;s really a never ending process.  But if you&#8217;re going to send out a press release claiming to have one upped Google, you had better be prepared to go head to head lest that press release accomplishes its purpose.</p>
<p>In the case of cuil.com, not only did they get press here, but they were one of the top headlines on cnn.com claiming to be &#8220;bigger than Google&#8221; before their servers couldn&#8217;t handle the search load.  The fact is, there aren&#8217;t really 120 billion web pages that matter (there aren&#8217;t 40 billion that matter), what&#8217;s important is that you have relevant and up-to-date info on the ones that do matter.  Google does, Cuil doesn&#8217;t.  I run one of the largest sites in the Middle East, all of the major search engines index our pages daily, Cuil hasn&#8217;t been there for at least 2 weeks.  Many of the (random and not necessarily relevant) pages of ours that they&#8217;ve indexed no longer exist.  The comments above about searching cuil on google vs. searching it on cuil ironically proves that very point.</p>
<p>The headlines will forget about cuil tomorrow (if not today), and they will probably have to dethrone one of the top three search engines before any major media risks giving them any press again.  What&#8217;s worse, however, is that they had a shot with a few million customers expecting to see something un-imaginable, something better than Google!  And I&#8217;d be surprised if even one of those users walked away feeling that their expectations had been met.  Cuil may have a great idea, a great product, and the perfect algorithm, but they hatched a preemie and instantly made their job a whole lot harder, if not impossible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul..</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/28/do-not-mistype-cuil/#comment-2422847</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul..</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 04:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20527#comment-2422847</guid>
		<description>Yikes, what's the story with the images that are shown with the search results?  Seems to be the same images returned for different sites which really confuses me when I'm looking at the results.  The images may have a meaning - and I kind of like the columnar view - but right now it just makes my head spin :-)

(and on a self-important note our site shows up on page 7 which is kind of annoying ;-) ).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yikes, what&#8217;s the story with the images that are shown with the search results?  Seems to be the same images returned for different sites which really confuses me when I&#8217;m looking at the results.  The images may have a meaning - and I kind of like the columnar view - but right now it just makes my head spin <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>(and on a self-important note our site shows up on page 7 which is kind of annoying <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> ).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/28/do-not-mistype-cuil/#comment-2422683</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 01:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20527#comment-2422683</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;I found this interesting article&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.atelier-us.com/e-business-and-it/article/new-search-engine-wwwcuilcom-finally-ready-to-compete-with-google" rel="nofollow"&gt;New Search Engine, Cuil, Finally Ready to Compete With Google&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I found this interesting article</b><br />
<a href="http://www.atelier-us.com/e-business-and-it/article/new-search-engine-wwwcuilcom-finally-ready-to-compete-with-google" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/www.atelier-us.com');">New Search Engine, Cuil, Finally Ready to Compete With Google</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/28/do-not-mistype-cuil/#comment-2422653</link>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 01:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20527#comment-2422653</guid>
		<description>This is pretty funny. When you type 'cuil' cuil.com doesn't give you any relevant results! Google does, though...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is pretty funny. When you type &#8216;cuil&#8217; cuil.com doesn&#8217;t give you any relevant results! Google does, though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: waldo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/28/do-not-mistype-cuil/#comment-2422598</link>
		<dc:creator>waldo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20527#comment-2422598</guid>
		<description>There is a French, balls, and Hygiene joke around here somewhere....  (psst pass the catsup for my freedom fries)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a French, balls, and Hygiene joke around here somewhere&#8230;.  (psst pass the catsup for my freedom fries)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moe Glitz</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/28/do-not-mistype-cuil/#comment-2422550</link>
		<dc:creator>Moe Glitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 23:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20527#comment-2422550</guid>
		<description>It doesn't matter how many results pages are displayed for Keyword Searches on either Google or Cuil. What matters to the end User is finding the relevant information and the right link on the First Page.

Does any end User really care about finding 1,000,000 results for their chosen keyword search.
If Cuil really wants to eat into Google Search Marketplace, it needs to work really hard in the area of presenting a results First Page.
Google is still really naff in that area. Whenever I do a search there for cnet, it never shows cnet.com in the top four results.

I wish Cuil all the best in their quest to be a Search player, but I must make Two important points about their new website.
Firstly the homepage looks so dark and bleak. Compare Ask to Cuil. 
A Search Engine Homepage should look more bright and inviting.

Secondly the name is so bad. Even though the name is suppose to be pronounced 'cool' - as a word of mouth brand name, how many people are going to spell the word 'cuil' on a search engine site like Google, of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#8217;t matter how many results pages are displayed for Keyword Searches on either Google or Cuil. What matters to the end User is finding the relevant information and the right link on the First Page.</p>
<p>Does any end User really care about finding 1,000,000 results for their chosen keyword search.<br />
If Cuil really wants to eat into Google Search Marketplace, it needs to work really hard in the area of presenting a results First Page.<br />
Google is still really naff in that area. Whenever I do a search there for cnet, it never shows cnet.com in the top four results.</p>
<p>I wish Cuil all the best in their quest to be a Search player, but I must make Two important points about their new website.<br />
Firstly the homepage looks so dark and bleak. Compare Ask to Cuil.<br />
A Search Engine Homepage should look more bright and inviting.</p>
<p>Secondly the name is so bad. Even though the name is suppose to be pronounced &#8216;cool&#8217; - as a word of mouth brand name, how many people are going to spell the word &#8216;cuil&#8217; on a search engine site like Google, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NoBS</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/28/do-not-mistype-cuil/#comment-2422523</link>
		<dc:creator>NoBS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20527#comment-2422523</guid>
		<description>cuil can't even find itself... enter cuil in the search bar and everything else pops up...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cuil can&#8217;t even find itself&#8230; enter cuil in the search bar and everything else pops up&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: velioncho</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/28/do-not-mistype-cuil/#comment-2422480</link>
		<dc:creator>velioncho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 21:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20527#comment-2422480</guid>
		<description>Guys,
don't be too rash on this company. too early. 
Google evolved over the time to where it is now. You give enough time to this company and see. My point is that these guys show better results for some of the keywords I have used, - that makes me believe that they have better algorithms/engine but that they still have to do lot of improvements. Definitely there are some good brains behind this. Most of you who simply say you did not get results for a specific search, you have no clues what goes behind. If you are looking to compare all results side by side to Google, then do it after six months are so. However some of the results I saw from Cuil, they are way way better than Google, that makes me believe these guys have laid a good foundation and now they can build on top of it. Today's press coverage is definitely help them to pull more smart folks from the search world, to improve on the product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys,<br />
don&#8217;t be too rash on this company. too early.<br />
Google evolved over the time to where it is now. You give enough time to this company and see. My point is that these guys show better results for some of the keywords I have used, - that makes me believe that they have better algorithms/engine but that they still have to do lot of improvements. Definitely there are some good brains behind this. Most of you who simply say you did not get results for a specific search, you have no clues what goes behind. If you are looking to compare all results side by side to Google, then do it after six months are so. However some of the results I saw from Cuil, they are way way better than Google, that makes me believe these guys have laid a good foundation and now they can build on top of it. Today&#8217;s press coverage is definitely help them to pull more smart folks from the search world, to improve on the product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coffee</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/28/do-not-mistype-cuil/#comment-2422458</link>
		<dc:creator>coffee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 21:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20527#comment-2422458</guid>
		<description>I like how searching for 'cuil' on cuil's search engine returns nothing relevant about the company..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like how searching for &#8216;cuil&#8217; on cuil&#8217;s search engine returns nothing relevant about the company..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikhil</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/28/do-not-mistype-cuil/#comment-2422455</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikhil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 21:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20527#comment-2422455</guid>
		<description>So how is this tech news? Is Techcrunch getting paid to write about Cuil?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So how is this tech news? Is Techcrunch getting paid to write about Cuil?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skeptical</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/28/do-not-mistype-cuil/#comment-2422452</link>
		<dc:creator>Skeptical</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 21:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20527#comment-2422452</guid>
		<description>In French, if you drop the "i" in Cuil, it sounds pretty bad as well...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In French, if you drop the &#8220;i&#8221; in Cuil, it sounds pretty bad as well&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YM Ousley</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/28/do-not-mistype-cuil/#comment-2422447</link>
		<dc:creator>YM Ousley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 21:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20527#comment-2422447</guid>
		<description>I was going to say for French it could sound like "ass". Pretty sure there's only one meaning there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to say for French it could sound like &#8220;ass&#8221;. Pretty sure there&#8217;s only one meaning there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 10.208 seconds -->
