<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s Misleading Blog Post: The Size Of The Web And The Size Of Their Index Are Very Different</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/25/googles-misleading-blog-post-on-the-size-of-the-web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/25/googles-misleading-blog-post-on-the-size-of-the-web/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 02:58:35 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/25/googles-misleading-blog-post-on-the-size-of-the-web/comment-page-2/#comment-2537512</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 01:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20484#comment-2537512</guid>
		<description>Visit the site. Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Visit the site. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pagerank competitor from Miscrosoft: BrowseRank &#124; OnlyGizmos</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/25/googles-misleading-blog-post-on-the-size-of-the-web/comment-page-2/#comment-2506993</link>
		<dc:creator>Pagerank competitor from Miscrosoft: BrowseRank &#124; OnlyGizmos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 18:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20484#comment-2506993</guid>
		<description>[...] that Microsoft is playing with to compete on the web. And TechCrunch adds some spice to it. A recent post at TechCrunch suggested that Google&#8217;s claim of having  &#8216;the most comprehensive index of any search engine&#8217; might not stand true [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that Microsoft is playing with to compete on the web. And TechCrunch adds some spice to it. A recent post at TechCrunch suggested that Google&#8217;s claim of having  &#8216;the most comprehensive index of any search engine&#8217; might not stand true [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Does Cuil just offer more to ignore? &#124; csmonitor.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/25/googles-misleading-blog-post-on-the-size-of-the-web/comment-page-2/#comment-2489842</link>
		<dc:creator>Does Cuil just offer more to ignore? &#124; csmonitor.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 22:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20484#comment-2489842</guid>
		<description>[...] Even if Cuil’s catalog is greater than them all, is it enough to lure users away from Google? In anticipation of Cuil’s debut, the official Google blog announced this Friday that it’s aware of 1 trillion unique web pages. But it only allows you to search maybe 4 percent of those – if you believe the industry estimate that Google indexes 40 billion pages. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Even if Cuil’s catalog is greater than them all, is it enough to lure users away from Google? In anticipation of Cuil’s debut, the official Google blog announced this Friday that it’s aware of 1 trillion unique web pages. But it only allows you to search maybe 4 percent of those – if you believe the industry estimate that Google indexes 40 billion pages. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neue Suchmaschine - Cuil möchte Google den Rank ablaufen &#124; Kundenoffensive</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/25/googles-misleading-blog-post-on-the-size-of-the-web/comment-page-2/#comment-2428178</link>
		<dc:creator>Neue Suchmaschine - Cuil möchte Google den Rank ablaufen &#124; Kundenoffensive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 14:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20484#comment-2428178</guid>
		<description>[...] den letzten Wochen war eine Meldung vorherrschend: Google hat eine Billion Websiten gefunden. Laut TechCrunch indiziert Google davon aber &#8220;nur&#8221; rund 40 Milliarden. Mehr als die H&#228;lfte des [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] den letzten Wochen war eine Meldung vorherrschend: Google hat eine Billion Websiten gefunden. Laut TechCrunch indiziert Google davon aber &#8220;nur&#8221; rund 40 Milliarden. Mehr als die H&#228;lfte des [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noutati de la nenea Google - ep 2 ! at Dani&#8217;s Corner</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/25/googles-misleading-blog-post-on-the-size-of-the-web/comment-page-2/#comment-2426106</link>
		<dc:creator>Noutati de la nenea Google - ep 2 ! at Dani&#8217;s Corner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 08:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20484#comment-2426106</guid>
		<description>[...] 3. Google s-a laudat saptamana trecuta ca a ajuns la un trilion de pagini indexate. Cei de la Techcrunch sunt curiosi de ce nu indexeaza chiar toate site-urile, si anume unele fiind de spam. Cica sunt si ele foarte importante. Poate orgoliul e de vina? Mai multe AICI. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 3. Google s-a laudat saptamana trecuta ca a ajuns la un trilion de pagini indexate. Cei de la Techcrunch sunt curiosi de ce nu indexeaza chiar toate site-urile, si anume unele fiind de spam. Cica sunt si ele foarte importante. Poate orgoliul e de vina? Mai multe AICI. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How much of information is too much information? &#171; ICT for Peacebuilding (ICT4Peace)</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/25/googles-misleading-blog-post-on-the-size-of-the-web/comment-page-2/#comment-2425898</link>
		<dc:creator>How much of information is too much information? &#171; ICT for Peacebuilding (ICT4Peace)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 01:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20484#comment-2425898</guid>
		<description>[...] August 1, 2008   When it comes to Google, the size of the web and the size of their index are apparently very different. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] August 1, 2008   When it comes to Google, the size of the web and the size of their index are apparently very different. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Review of Cuil</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/25/googles-misleading-blog-post-on-the-size-of-the-web/comment-page-2/#comment-2423455</link>
		<dc:creator>Review of Cuil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 17:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20484#comment-2423455</guid>
		<description>[...] pages (&#8221;more than any other search engine&#8221;), which they state would be more than 3 times the size of Google&#8217;s index. And this would be quite the feat. Scouring the web is expensive. What makes Google so great (and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] pages (&#8221;more than any other search engine&#8221;), which they state would be more than 3 times the size of Google&#8217;s index. And this would be quite the feat. Scouring the web is expensive. What makes Google so great (and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Origin of Cuil, and Other Ridiculous Company Names &#124; Buzz Pirates</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/25/googles-misleading-blog-post-on-the-size-of-the-web/comment-page-2/#comment-2423140</link>
		<dc:creator>The Origin of Cuil, and Other Ridiculous Company Names &#124; Buzz Pirates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20484#comment-2423140</guid>
		<description>[...] Ten Duotrigintillion. Interestingly, Google recently announced that they&#8217;ve indexed their 1 Trillionth web url. They were all stoked until they realized that 1 Trillion is only [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ten Duotrigintillion. Interestingly, Google recently announced that they&#8217;ve indexed their 1 Trillionth web url. They were all stoked until they realized that 1 Trillion is only [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 4 Ways to Beat Google at Search : peopleTheatre</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/25/googles-misleading-blog-post-on-the-size-of-the-web/comment-page-2/#comment-2422897</link>
		<dc:creator>4 Ways to Beat Google at Search : peopleTheatre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 05:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20484#comment-2422897</guid>
		<description>[...] technology gimmick is the size of its index: 121 billion pages as opposed to Google’s estimated 40 billion or [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] technology gimmick is the size of its index: 121 billion pages as opposed to Google’s estimated 40 billion or [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cuil &#171; Kurt&#8217;s Rasmussen Class Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/25/googles-misleading-blog-post-on-the-size-of-the-web/comment-page-2/#comment-2422782</link>
		<dc:creator>Cuil &#171; Kurt&#8217;s Rasmussen Class Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 03:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20484#comment-2422782</guid>
		<description>[...] on the web (Google doesn’t disclose the size of their index, although they claim to know about a trillion unique web pages) (Update: see our very early testing here). They’ve also dropped one of the “l’s” from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on the web (Google doesn’t disclose the size of their index, although they claim to know about a trillion unique web pages) (Update: see our very early testing here). They’ve also dropped one of the “l’s” from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cuil Launches A Massive Search Engine &#171; Latest And The New</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/25/googles-misleading-blog-post-on-the-size-of-the-web/comment-page-2/#comment-2422746</link>
		<dc:creator>Cuil Launches A Massive Search Engine &#171; Latest And The New</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20484#comment-2422746</guid>
		<description>[...] on the web (Google doesn’t disclose the size of their index, although they claim to know about a trillion unique web pages) (Update: see our very early testing here). They’ve also dropped one of the “l’s” from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on the web (Google doesn’t disclose the size of their index, although they claim to know about a trillion unique web pages) (Update: see our very early testing here). They’ve also dropped one of the “l’s” from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cuil Launches A Massive Search Engine</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/25/googles-misleading-blog-post-on-the-size-of-the-web/comment-page-2/#comment-2422741</link>
		<dc:creator>Cuil Launches A Massive Search Engine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20484#comment-2422741</guid>
		<description>[...] the web (Google doesn&#8217;t disclose the size of their index, although they claim to know about a trillion unique web pages) ( Update: see our very early testing here). They&#8217;ve also dropped one of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the web (Google doesn&#8217;t disclose the size of their index, although they claim to know about a trillion unique web pages) ( Update: see our very early testing here). They&#8217;ve also dropped one of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SitePoint Blogs &#187; 4 Ways to Beat Google at Search</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/25/googles-misleading-blog-post-on-the-size-of-the-web/comment-page-2/#comment-2422330</link>
		<dc:creator>SitePoint Blogs &#187; 4 Ways to Beat Google at Search</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20484#comment-2422330</guid>
		<description>[...] technology gimmick is the size of its index: 121 billion pages as opposed to Google&#8217;s estimated 40 billion or so.  Cuil also touts a better ranking algorithm based on &#8220;content and relevance&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] technology gimmick is the size of its index: 121 billion pages as opposed to Google&#8217;s estimated 40 billion or so.  Cuil also touts a better ranking algorithm based on &#8220;content and relevance&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Trillion URLs &#171; The Scholarly Kitchen</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/25/googles-misleading-blog-post-on-the-size-of-the-web/comment-page-2/#comment-2422059</link>
		<dc:creator>A Trillion URLs &#171; The Scholarly Kitchen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20484#comment-2422059</guid>
		<description>[...] as TechCrunch has pointed out, discovering all these URLs and actually storing information about them are two different things. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as TechCrunch has pointed out, discovering all these URLs and actually storing information about them are two different things. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: We&#8217;re All Just Link Farmers Now&#8230; &#124; Redfin Corporate Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/25/googles-misleading-blog-post-on-the-size-of-the-web/comment-page-2/#comment-2422042</link>
		<dc:creator>We&#8217;re All Just Link Farmers Now&#8230; &#124; Redfin Corporate Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20484#comment-2422042</guid>
		<description>[...] For a long time, we have all brooded and marveled at how the entire Internet has been deformed by the enormous mass of Google at its center. Just last Friday, Google seemed to conclude that the size of the Web is no larger than the size of its index. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For a long time, we have all brooded and marveled at how the entire Internet has been deformed by the enormous mass of Google at its center. Just last Friday, Google seemed to conclude that the size of the Web is no larger than the size of its index. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Now Tracks 1 Trillion URLs</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/25/googles-misleading-blog-post-on-the-size-of-the-web/comment-page-2/#comment-2421826</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Now Tracks 1 Trillion URLs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20484#comment-2421826</guid>
		<description>[...] Jesse Alpert &amp; Nissan Hajaj, &#8220;We Knew The Web Was Big&#8221;, Google Blog, July 25, 2008, Michael Arrington, &#8220;Google’s Misleading Blog Post: The Size Of The Web And The Size Of Their..., Frederic Lardinois, &#8220;Google Now Knows About 1 Trillion Pages&#8221;, Read Write Web, July [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jesse Alpert &amp; Nissan Hajaj, &#8220;We Knew The Web Was Big&#8221;, Google Blog, July 25, 2008, Michael Arrington, &#8220;Google’s Misleading Blog Post: The Size Of The Web And The Size Of Their&#8230;, Frederic Lardinois, &#8220;Google Now Knows About 1 Trillion Pages&#8221;, Read Write Web, July [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zaki mirza</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/25/googles-misleading-blog-post-on-the-size-of-the-web/comment-page-2/#comment-2421314</link>
		<dc:creator>zaki mirza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 04:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20484#comment-2421314</guid>
		<description>if your final comment was about CUIL then im sorry to say CUIL failed to impress me even a bit (even the ontology is something quite old now .. something like searchme.com is far better).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if your final comment was about CUIL then im sorry to say CUIL failed to impress me even a bit (even the ontology is something quite old now .. something like searchme.com is far better).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cuil Launches A Massive Search Engine</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/25/googles-misleading-blog-post-on-the-size-of-the-web/comment-page-2/#comment-2421258</link>
		<dc:creator>Cuil Launches A Massive Search Engine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 04:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20484#comment-2421258</guid>
		<description>[...] the web (Google doesn&#8217;t disclose the size of their index, although they claim to know about a trillion unique web pages). They&#8217;ve also dropped one of the &#8220;l&#8217;s&#8221; from their name - previously the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the web (Google doesn&#8217;t disclose the size of their index, although they claim to know about a trillion unique web pages). They&#8217;ve also dropped one of the &#8220;l&#8217;s&#8221; from their name &#8211; previously the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/25/googles-misleading-blog-post-on-the-size-of-the-web/comment-page-2/#comment-2421214</link>
		<dc:creator>seo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 02:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20484#comment-2421214</guid>
		<description>good things is   
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bjlaser.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;光学元件&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good things is<br />
<a href="http://www.bjlaser.net" rel="nofollow">光学元件</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MY-Hou &#124; 不務正業</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/25/googles-misleading-blog-post-on-the-size-of-the-web/comment-page-2/#comment-2421129</link>
		<dc:creator>MY-Hou &#124; 不務正業</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 22:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20484#comment-2421129</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;PageRank与最近的Google...&lt;/strong&gt;

Google PageRank 这两天又成了热门话题咯，为啥？它更新了呗.
......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>PageRank与最近的Google&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Google PageRank 这两天又成了热门话题咯，为啥？它更新了呗.<br />
&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1986 To Present &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google 到底索引了多少网页? Google 到底索引了多少网页?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/25/googles-misleading-blog-post-on-the-size-of-the-web/comment-page-2/#comment-2421002</link>
		<dc:creator>1986 To Present &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google 到底索引了多少网页? Google 到底索引了多少网页?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 16:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20484#comment-2421002</guid>
		<description>[...] 今天 Google 官方博客发表了一篇文章说他们索引了互联网上的一万亿个独立 URL. TechCrunch 马上出来一篇文章对 Google 的文章做了进一步解释. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 今天 Google 官方博客发表了一篇文章说他们索引了互联网上的一万亿个独立 URL. TechCrunch 马上出来一篇文章对 Google 的文章做了进一步解释. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amit Chowdhry</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/25/googles-misleading-blog-post-on-the-size-of-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-2420996</link>
		<dc:creator>Amit Chowdhry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 16:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20484#comment-2420996</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s hilarious!! hahaha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s hilarious!! hahaha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alexc</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/25/googles-misleading-blog-post-on-the-size-of-the-web/comment-page-2/#comment-2420953</link>
		<dc:creator>alexc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 13:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20484#comment-2420953</guid>
		<description>Those who actually crawl and index data would know that there is actually a link between number of discovered urls and number of them crawled - we have discovered 211 bln unique urls in crawl of around 43 bln pages (only successfully retrieved counted), this is pretty representative of the web scale: using 5 urls for 1 crawled page ratio we can arrive to figure of 200 bln pages crawled by Google in which they discovered 1 trln unique urls. Their index might be around 40 bln, however they certainly did crawl a lot more than that and only included best candidates into full text index. 

So I reckon this article is as misleading as Googles post ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those who actually crawl and index data would know that there is actually a link between number of discovered urls and number of them crawled &#8211; we have discovered 211 bln unique urls in crawl of around 43 bln pages (only successfully retrieved counted), this is pretty representative of the web scale: using 5 urls for 1 crawled page ratio we can arrive to figure of 200 bln pages crawled by Google in which they discovered 1 trln unique urls. Their index might be around 40 bln, however they certainly did crawl a lot more than that and only included best candidates into full text index. </p>
<p>So I reckon this article is as misleading as Googles post <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: גוגל מכירה מעל טריליון עמודי אינטרנט. קידום אתרים. &#124; גוגל-ספרה</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/25/googles-misleading-blog-post-on-the-size-of-the-web/comment-page-2/#comment-2420882</link>
		<dc:creator>גוגל מכירה מעל טריליון עמודי אינטרנט. קידום אתרים. &#124; גוגל-ספרה</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 09:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20484#comment-2420882</guid>
		<description>[...] להם כח מחשוב לכך אך ישנם קריטריונים שונים לאינדוקס. יש מעריכים כי מספר הדפים שגוגל מאנדקס הוא בסביבות ה40 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] להם כח מחשוב לכך אך ישנם קריטריונים שונים לאינדוקס. יש מעריכים כי מספר הדפים שגוגל מאנדקס הוא בסביבות ה40 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Banach</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/25/googles-misleading-blog-post-on-the-size-of-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-2420759</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Banach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 02:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=20484#comment-2420759</guid>
		<description>&quot;couille&quot; means testicle in french and is pronounced the same way. what a joke!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;couille&#8221; means testicle in french and is pronounced the same way. what a joke!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
