Comments on: MedPedia Is Wikifying the Medical Search Space

By: Medpedia preview site is now live « Oogalabs’s Blog

Medpedia preview site is now live « Oogalabs’s Blog — Thu, 30 Apr 2009 20:02:09 +0000

[...] release here TechCrunch here Los Angeles Times [...]

By: Medpedia’s Health Platform Could Be Just What The Doctor Ordered | Kawink Blog

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:08:52 +0000

[...] Project, an initiative we wrote about during its private beta launch, has unveiled a public version of its trustworthy, fully transparent [...]

By: Medpedia’s Health Platform Could Be Just What The Doctor Ordered | Spin Valley Post

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:30:29 +0000

[...] Project, an initiative we wrote about during its private beta launch, has unveiled a public version of its trustworthy, fully transparent [...]

By: Medpedia’s Health Platform Could Be Just What The Doctor Ordered

Medpedia’s Health Platform Could Be Just What The Doctor Ordered — Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:25:22 +0000

[...] Project, an initiative we wrote about during its private beta launch, has unveiled a public version of its trustworthy, fully transparent [...]

By: Medpedia’s Health Platform Could Be Just What The Doctor Ordered

Medpedia’s Health Platform Could Be Just What The Doctor Ordered — Tue, 17 Feb 2009 08:03:26 +0000

[...] Project, an initiative we wrote about during its private beta launch, has unveiled a public version of its trustworthy, fully transparent [...]

By: blog.e-healthgr | Medpedia, ιατρική εγκυκλοπαίδεια τύπου wikipedia

blog.e-healthgr | Medpedia, ιατρική εγκυκλοπαίδεια τύπου wikipedia — Wed, 24 Sep 2008 19:28:44 +0000

[...] MedPedia Is Wikifying the Medical Search Space, TechCrunch [...]

By: Ultrasound Equipment

Ultrasound Equipment — Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:22:05 +0000

Thanks to the article, well thought out. I searched for a while to find the right answer to my questions!

By: heyjudeseattle

heyjudeseattle — Mon, 04 Aug 2008 23:47:07 +0000

Is there really a shortage of expert medical opinion on the Web? We’ve got PubMed and Google Scholar for scholarly journals. WebMD, MayoClinic, and RevolutionHealth all provide varying degrees of expert advice. The list goes on and on. I hope that MedPedia avoids becoming another walled garden of content by and for doctors. Instead, I’d love to see a well-moderated, mash-up of evidence-based medicine and consumer experience. That would be new!

By: Healthcare Economist · Wikipedia for Medicine

Healthcare Economist · Wikipedia for Medicine — Thu, 31 Jul 2008 05:37:22 +0000

[...] Hat Tip: Tech Crunch. [...]

By: Medical ‘Wikipedia’ Is Looking For a Few Good Doctors « .: HealthyGuys’s HealthBlog :.

Sun, 27 Jul 2008 22:53:23 +0000

[...] site is backed by an incubator called Ooga Labs (whose Silicon Valley cred is detailed at TechCrunch) and will run text [...]

By: Medical ‘Wikipedia’ Is Looking For a Few Good Doctors

Medical ‘Wikipedia’ Is Looking For a Few Good Doctors — Sun, 27 Jul 2008 10:11:23 +0000

[...] site is backed by an incubator called Ooga Labs (whose Silicon Valley cred is detailed at TechCrunch) and will run text [...]

By: Medical ‘Wikipedia’ Is Looking An Eye To a Only One Good Doctors : Antidepressant

Sat, 26 Jul 2008 08:18:14 +0000

[...] locality is backed around an incubator called Ooga Labs (whose Silicon Valley cred is full at TechCrunch) and wishes run printed matter [...]

By: BioMedical Science » Blog Archive » Medical ‘Wikipedia’ Is Looking For a Few Good Doctors

Fri, 25 Jul 2008 20:26:46 +0000

[...] site is backed by an incubator called Ooga Labs (whose Silicon Valley cred is detailed at TechCrunch) and will run text [...]

By: Health Blog : Medical 'Wikipedia' Is Looking For a Few Good Doctors

Health Blog : Medical 'Wikipedia' Is Looking For a Few Good Doctors — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 19:46:59 +0000

[...] backed by a for-profit incubator called Ooga Labs (whose Silicon Valley cred is detailed at TechCrunch), and text ads will run on the [...]

By: Thomas

Thomas — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:26:11 +0000

I require a site where I can look up persistent adverse events/effects sufferred post chemotherapy treatment. As an example*, my wife, for breast cancer, was treated with CMF chemo drugs. Due to severe adverse reactions this treatment was abandoned at the halfway stage. Pre treatment for 61 years she did not have heartburn (reflux) but during and post treatment she had persistent severe refractory reflux that did not respond to drugs and eventually required anti-reflux surgery. Pre surgery it was found that her stomach produced more than double the normal amount of acid [plus other defects]. I cannot find a causal link that the chemo drugs caused the abnormal acid increase. For my medical insurer to accept a claim (iotrogenic injury) of less than 1%, I must provide the research material and this is very hard to find. Living in a small closed community like New Zealand, it is not so easy to obtain assistance from the medical profesionals. Tom Cawood Auckland NZ
* also persistent episodic refractory nausea and formation of cataracts.

By: Michiel van der Blonk

Michiel van der Blonk — Thu, 24 Jul 2008 04:03:55 +0000

Nice. Now what I really need is an online expert system that knows all this information and guides me through a diagnostic process. Then I buy the meds on ebay and I won’t have to go to the doctor ever again! Ok that’s not serious but yes an expert system (simple decision tree) would be very insightful.

By: MedPedia Is Wikifying the Medical Search Space « Weblibraryjpn’s Weblog

Wed, 23 Jul 2008 23:33:07 +0000

[...] MedPedia Is Wikifying the Medical Search Space(July 23, 2008 TechCrunch) MedPedia is a new project, currently in development, that will offer an online collaborative medical encyclopedia for use by the general public. [...]

By: MedicalWriter

MedicalWriter — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 21:53:12 +0000

Great idea, but have you ever read anything written by an MD? Usually not very pretty. Not to mention understandable by the average person.

By: Adrian Midgley

Adrian Midgley — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 21:30:49 +0000

http://ganfyd.org has been doing something quite similar for a couple of years now.

The licence is carefully thought out, and subtly different.

We have not had any trouble with infighting, unlike the dafter parts of WP.

By: Ca-Jobs.org | California Jobs » Blog Archive » Medpedia PHP Software Engineer (financial district)

Wed, 23 Jul 2008 20:48:32 +0000

[...] http://www.tech...l-search-space/ LA Times: [...]

By: TechCrunch: MedPedia Is Wikifying the Medical Search Space « TechJews.com

TechCrunch: MedPedia Is Wikifying the Medical Search Space « TechJews.com — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 18:52:06 +0000

[...] TechCrunch Read more here: http://www.tech...al-search-space Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Eric Sorscher5th Annual AMSA ARC Premed Conference [...]

By: Jonathan

Jonathan — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 16:21:51 +0000

I hope this works. Another new medical site that also allows people to contribute information is RareShare (http://www.RareShare.org). This one focuses on rare diseases, not general health, and also has a social networking dimension to it…

By: Kamic

Kamic — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:33:00 +0000

I would defiantly use this site as I have problems with my pancreas; I can’t seem to find information with reliable sources. For example I found that some sites say my life expectancies anywhere from 5 years to a normal life span. How can it be so varied? Our health care system needs to have more research completed at home to not only help themselves but help the doctors down the right path.

By: Israel

Israel — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:26:55 +0000

The fact that they will police the information posted by Md and Phd’s is excellent I look forward to seeing more from medpedia. I agree with Udo that the insider materials will help wikpedia.

By: Udo

Udo — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:13:53 +0000

Having only professionals edit content may alleviate spam, but it will do nothing (quite the opposite) to prevent bickering and infighting, occasionally accompanied by displays of gross incompetence. And when this occurs, people won’t be able to step in and repair stuff the way it’s done on Wikipedia.

Another “problem” is that this site is targeted at consumers with a mere high-school level education. I don’t see how it can be a useful tool for the scientific community even if they introduce a separate category of pages they call “more technical” info.

But since this is all available for free under a GNU license i’m hoping useful content can be smarted up and then backported into Wikipedia where it belongs. Especially tons of PD diagrams and image material that MedPedia seems to have liberated from some institutions.