Microsoft Testing Self Serve Publisher Advertising Product For The First Time
by Michael Arrington on July 17, 2008

Microsoft is testing a new pilot program that will let third party publishers add Microsoft’s contextual ads next to their content in a self-serve format. From what we can tell from the email below, it will be very similar to Google’ Adsense and Yahoo’s Publisher Network.

Google dominates this space (and all other contextual advertising) because it offers publishers far higher fees for ads. Yahoo and Microsoft have made up for that shortfall by offering guarantees in the past. Or in the case of Yahoo, by offering more flexible products like allowing their ads to be shown next to third party search results.

The new program will begin on July 21. No word on how Microsoft will get more money to these sites than what is offered by Google today but they are not requiring exclusivity: “You may also use Microsoft ads on the same sites and pages as Google ads as long as you do not have a specific exclusivity agreement with them.”

Putting ads on third parties is a controversial product, since advertisers expect the kinds of click throughs and conversions that they get from search. Earlier this week Google was sued for fraud because ads placed on parked pages weren’t producing results.

Still, if Microsoft is willing to take a bath and pay publishers more than Google does, they can get a lot of page views quickly and build up inventory.

Full email is below. I’ve contacted Microsoft for a comment. From what we can determine this is the first time Microsoft has experimented with a self-serve product. Until now, you had to enter into a partnership agreement with them and they only targeted very high traffic sites.

Update: A Microsoft spokesperson says this trial has actually been underway since earlier this year with a small group of publishers, but won’t say when or if this will officially roll out publicly.

Update 2: Microsoft has sent us the following statement:

Microsoft’s self-serve advertising offering for publishers is still under development and is currently in a private pilot phase, being tested by select publishers who met the participation requirements. The private pilot phase began earlier this year. A private, phased approach allows us to learn more about customer interest in content advertising and provide guidance as to how we can improve the product and deliver the right features required to meet publisher and advertiser needs. It’s our intention to continue to expand our high quality network and relevant audience gradually and intelligently over time for our advertisers. We will evaluate customer interest and product performance as we move through the private pilot, but we have no specific launch plans to announce at this time.

We encourage publishers who are interested in joining the pilot to fill out an interest form here: http://advertising.microsoft.com/publisher


Dear xxxxxx:

Thank you for your recent completion of the self-submission form on the Microsoft adCenter site for this program. Below is more information for you about the pilot. I can answer general questions you may have about participation. Please let me know if you would like to proceed and I can invite you formally on Monday July 21st to begin.

The pilot is small and not public, and participants will be asked to agree to a Confidentiality Statement before taking part – this means that you will not be able to blog about the program or discuss it outside of your company.. We would be seeking feedback and suggestions from you about the service, its interface, and its effectiveness in generating revenue for your site. There is no exclusivity requirement and no minimum requirement for the number of ad units you may implement. You may use other contextual ads on the same pages as Microsoft ads during the pilot or implement only on the most relevant pages on your site.

You may also use Microsoft ads on the same sites and pages as Google ads as long as you do not have a specific exclusivity agreement with them.

“Competitive Ads and Services: In order to prevent user confusion, we do not permit Google ads or search boxes to be published on websites that also contain other ads or services formatted to use the same layout and colors as the Google ads or search boxes on that site. Although you may sell ads directly on your site, it is your responsibility to ensure these ads cannot be confused with Google ads.”

In addition, please take note of the following:

•We would request that you agree to take part in the pilot for at least two months or two full payment cycles.

•Only publishers who are U.S. based may take part; completing a W9 form is necessary to receive payment.

•Click rates will be closely monitored during the pilot and publishers whose click rates give cause for concern or are anomalous will be removed from the program and will not be paid for clicks on their ads.

•Microsoft can make no guarantee regarding the amount of any payments you may receive for the ads shown on your website during this test although the purpose of the program is to monetize your site with contextual advertising.

•We would ask that you not use a third party provider to serve Microsoft ads during this test program. If this is an impossible obstacle for you, please contact me about it.

•For the purposes of the pilot, you will be limited to a single account but you may implement ads on up to ten approved web properties that comply with the Microsoft adCenter editorial guidelines.

Best regards,

XXXXXXXX (for Aditi) at Microsoft

Responses (Trackback URL)

Comments

they should have just bought adbrite, kind of surprising a ton of successful companies haven’t emerged in this arena.

 

Maybe they are preparing for Yahoogle. They said that Yahoogle will have 90% of internet ads market.

 

Microsoft is blowing. As mentioned, Google dominates this space. Microsoft needs to think pro actively, not reactively, if they ever wish to compete in internet advertising with Google, and even Yahoo (lol). Since they all copy each other anyway, maybe they should just merge and create Microgooglehoo.

See an article about it here… http://www.gothamtechminute.blogspot.com

Absolutely, instead of trying to buy themselves to the top by buying Yahoo, should go after Google by creating innovative and useful products that add value, as that article suggests.

 
 

Nice! Microsoft should have done this a long time ago.

It’s better late than never. But Google is still far ahead in this game with the new Affiliate Network and etc. I wonder if the trend will always be Google leading the way. It’s good to have a change to see other companies doing something entirely different and add some creativity into the online advertising market.

Best,

Darren Lee
AdExel.com (in alpha)

 

typo error on the link - sorry!

Darren Lee
AdExcel.com (in alpha)

 

Mike why the censoring of the last comment? It was a factual statement that there are blogs already running it.

 

The problem with MS and Yahoo is that they dont include international publishers in these programs. With that they just leave google alone with a really big market. Because many publishers are based outside the US, but their traffic in great part in from US. All international publisher knows that.

 

This is fantastic news.

Any examples of websites displaying MS ad units?

 

Anyone have a link of a site already running this? Would be interesting to see the MS ads.

 
 

MSFT needs a game changer targeting tech here to convince advertisers and publishers to adopt a new solution on the long run. I would bet it will come in semantic targeting tech. (targeting ads by page relevance vs. random keywords) and new video ads.

Partially agreed, though “semantic targeting tech” is no game changer. It is the same game with different parameters. Looks like they intend to use the, “same formatting and colors”.

This is so ME-TOO to be absolutely disturbing. I guess that’s what startups are for: changing the game.

Good thing windows/office are entrenched and old people (read: execs) hate change.

Totally agree! I think the ME-TOo strategy is counter productive.

If you want to make a statement to the world that you guys are going head on with the No.1 (Google), then you should come out with sonething more bizarre and exciting.

Probably need to rethink the strategy a little.

Then again, like I said in the earlier comment, it’s better late than never to get some improvements.

 
 
 

You got to wonder what on earth took them so long to do this . . . .

 

We’ve been running pubcenter for a few month now. Its a copy of adsense but with a lot higher payouts :)) At least in this phase. Anyways, here is our site with their ad units: http://sanebull.com

Their system is contextual as well, so the ads are relevant. They also offer a more powerful ad configuration tool than adsense.

 

These guys are running it rotating with AdSense and YPN:

http://www.automoblog.net/

Click through to a post to see it, refresh if you can’t, it’s rotating.

Looks like you can actually have gradients as a background here. Wonder if that helps with CTR

 
 

really cool thanks…..

well its not enough to say cool thanks

i will say really good for this news i have applied for it lets see whats the response

 

good news, also in the sense, when this will out live, .. adsense will also improve it.

 

Leave a Reply

Create a Gravatar for your comments.
« Back to text comment