<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Trends Subverted Again. This Is Getting (ʎllɐǝɹ) Embarrasing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/14/google-trends-subverted-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/14/google-trends-subverted-again/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:37:56 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ✈ ▌▌ = Google Trends Hacked Again &#124; MMM</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/14/google-trends-subverted-again/comment-page-2/#comment-2626718</link>
		<dc:creator>✈ ▌▌ = Google Trends Hacked Again &#124; MMM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19969#comment-2626718</guid>
		<description>[...] Trends has been hacked several times in the past and one has to wonder what they can do to prevent such [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Trends has been hacked several times in the past and one has to wonder what they can do to prevent such [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unpleasant Google Trends Subversion: ✈ ▌▌ &#124; Gallito Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/14/google-trends-subverted-again/comment-page-2/#comment-2604849</link>
		<dc:creator>Unpleasant Google Trends Subversion: ✈ ▌▌ &#124; Gallito Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 22:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19969#comment-2604849</guid>
		<description>[...] leading to endless debate on whether it was an ugly symbol or not. Later that month the site was attacked again. 4Chan was the culprit last time, we&#8217;ll see if they&#8217;re again [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] leading to endless debate on whether it was an ugly symbol or not. Later that month the site was attacked again. 4Chan was the culprit last time, we&#8217;ll see if they&#8217;re again [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hack en Google Trends ✈ ▌▌ &#124; Sólo Pa SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/14/google-trends-subverted-again/comment-page-2/#comment-2587536</link>
		<dc:creator>Hack en Google Trends ✈ ▌▌ &#124; Sólo Pa SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 14:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19969#comment-2587536</guid>
		<description>[...] leading to endless debate on whether it was an ugly symbol or not. Later that month the site was attacked again. 4Chan was the culprit last time, we’ll see if they’re again [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] leading to endless debate on whether it was an ugly symbol or not. Later that month the site was attacked again. 4Chan was the culprit last time, we’ll see if they’re again [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Trends-palvelun väärinkäyttöä &#124; Piilaakso.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/14/google-trends-subverted-again/comment-page-2/#comment-2587329</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Trends-palvelun väärinkäyttöä &#124; Piilaakso.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 06:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19969#comment-2587329</guid>
		<description>[...] puoleensa ihmisiä, jotka pyrkivät väärinkäyttämään sitä. Tässä on pariin eri otteeseen onnistuttukin, eli saamaan haluttu hakutulos nostatettua listalle. Viimevuoden heinäkuussa [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] puoleensa ihmisiä, jotka pyrkivät väärinkäyttämään sitä. Tässä on pariin eri otteeseen onnistuttukin, eli saamaan haluttu hakutulos nostatettua listalle. Viimevuoden heinäkuussa [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Trends Falls Victim to Disturbing Stunt - Bits Blog - NYTimes.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/14/google-trends-subverted-again/comment-page-2/#comment-2587276</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Trends Falls Victim to Disturbing Stunt - Bits Blog - NYTimes.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 05:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19969#comment-2587276</guid>
		<description>[...] stunts in recent months. In July, a swastika appeared on Hot Trends. A week later, the list was attacked [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] stunts in recent months. In July, a swastika appeared on Hot Trends. A week later, the list was attacked [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Un avión contra dos torres como término popular en Google Trends ✈ ▌▌ - Bitácora de Webmaster</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/14/google-trends-subverted-again/comment-page-2/#comment-2586632</link>
		<dc:creator>Un avión contra dos torres como término popular en Google Trends ✈ ▌▌ - Bitácora de Webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19969#comment-2586632</guid>
		<description>[...] dos torres ✈ ▌▌. No es la primera vez, pues ya en julio sucedió lo mismo con una suástica y anteriormente con el texto “ǝlƃooƃ noʎ ʞɔnɟ”. En aquellos momentos Google alegó que estos términos se calculan automáticamente por algoritmos [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] dos torres ✈ ▌▌. No es la primera vez, pues ya en julio sucedió lo mismo con una suástica y anteriormente con el texto “ǝlƃooƃ noʎ ʞɔnɟ”. En aquellos momentos Google alegó que estos términos se calculan automáticamente por algoritmos [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ✈ ▌▌ - Unpleasant Google Trends Subversion</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/14/google-trends-subverted-again/comment-page-2/#comment-2586566</link>
		<dc:creator>✈ ▌▌ - Unpleasant Google Trends Subversion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19969#comment-2586566</guid>
		<description>[...] leading to endless debate on whether it was an ugly symbol or not. Later that month the site was attacked again. 4Chan was the culprit last time, we&#8217;ll see if they&#8217;re again [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] leading to endless debate on whether it was an ugly symbol or not. Later that month the site was attacked again. 4Chan was the culprit last time, we&#8217;ll see if they&#8217;re again [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: perde</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/14/google-trends-subverted-again/comment-page-2/#comment-2575456</link>
		<dc:creator>perde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19969#comment-2575456</guid>
		<description>very very nice</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very very nice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Reading Forum &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Google Trends Game</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/14/google-trends-subverted-again/comment-page-2/#comment-2448013</link>
		<dc:creator>The Reading Forum &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Google Trends Game</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 17:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19969#comment-2448013</guid>
		<description>[...] been reading some of the chatter about how some folks have gamed google trends recently.  Tech Crunch had a blurb about some inverted text that made it to the top of trends that speaks to how it&#8217;s done.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] been reading some of the chatter about how some folks have gamed google trends recently.  Tech Crunch had a blurb about some inverted text that made it to the top of trends that speaks to how it&#8217;s done.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Trends Gets Gamed &#124; Make Money Online</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/14/google-trends-subverted-again/comment-page-2/#comment-2445559</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Trends Gets Gamed &#124; Make Money Online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 09:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19969#comment-2445559</guid>
		<description>[...] poop at work” (which made it at least to No. 10). That is after the top result this morning was “?l?oo? no? ??n?.” And last week, there was the swastika [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] poop at work” (which made it at least to No. 10). That is after the top result this morning was “?l?oo? no? ??n?.” And last week, there was the swastika [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ˙˙˙ǝɾǝɾ sɐɹqɐlɐd sɐl ɹɐǝʇloʌ oɯoɔ - como voltear las palabras - Artifacts: el blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/14/google-trends-subverted-again/comment-page-2/#comment-2427746</link>
		<dc:creator>˙˙˙ǝɾǝɾ sɐɹqɐlɐd sɐl ɹɐǝʇloʌ oɯoɔ - como voltear las palabras - Artifacts: el blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 20:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19969#comment-2427746</guid>
		<description>[...] unos días vi en TechCrunch una historia de un hackeo que lograron hacerle a Google al poner la frase &#8220;ǝlƃooƃ noʎ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] unos días vi en TechCrunch una historia de un hackeo que lograron hacerle a Google al poner la frase &#8220;ǝlƃooƃ noʎ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redcram</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/14/google-trends-subverted-again/comment-page-2/#comment-2424091</link>
		<dc:creator>redcram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19969#comment-2424091</guid>
		<description>To call it subversion is stupid, how many times in a short period did google need to caught out, google is becoming too big if it can see this.

This should be called Diseconomies of Scale google style.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To call it subversion is stupid, how many times in a short period did google need to caught out, google is becoming too big if it can see this.</p>
<p>This should be called Diseconomies of Scale google style.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Google TechTalk Rss Feed Hacked? &#124; am i works?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/14/google-trends-subverted-again/comment-page-2/#comment-2417403</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Google TechTalk Rss Feed Hacked? &#124; am i works?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19969#comment-2417403</guid>
		<description>[...] is happening with Google, first spammers were able to  manipulate the google trends and now [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is happening with Google, first spammers were able to  manipulate the google trends and now [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ˙˙˙ǝɾǝɾ sɐɹqɐlɐd sɐl ɹɐǝʇloʌ oɯoɔ - Artifacts: el blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/14/google-trends-subverted-again/comment-page-2/#comment-2416652</link>
		<dc:creator>˙˙˙ǝɾǝɾ sɐɹqɐlɐd sɐl ɹɐǝʇloʌ oɯoɔ - Artifacts: el blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 01:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19969#comment-2416652</guid>
		<description>[...] unos días vi en TechCrunch una historia de un hackeo que lograron hacerle a Google al poner la frase &#8220;ǝlƃooƃ noʎ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] unos días vi en TechCrunch una historia de un hackeo que lograron hacerle a Google al poner la frase &#8220;ǝlƃooƃ noʎ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: don't follow that link</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/14/google-trends-subverted-again/comment-page-1/#comment-2416637</link>
		<dc:creator>don't follow that link</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19969#comment-2416637</guid>
		<description>Do not folow that link.  That website just plays the same song over &amp; over again, with pop-ups (no your blocker won&#039;t help) of the lyrics... forever.  You have to reboot to get away.  Jerks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do not folow that link.  That website just plays the same song over &amp; over again, with pop-ups (no your blocker won&#8217;t help) of the lyrics&#8230; forever.  You have to reboot to get away.  Jerks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Trends Gets Gamed &#124; Just Past Stories</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/14/google-trends-subverted-again/comment-page-2/#comment-2415549</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Trends Gets Gamed &#124; Just Past Stories</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 05:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19969#comment-2415549</guid>
		<description>[...] poop at work” (which made it at least to No. 10). That is after the top result this morning was “?l?oo? no? ??n?.” And last week, there was the swastika [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] poop at work” (which made it at least to No. 10). That is after the top result this morning was “?l?oo? no? ??n?.” And last week, there was the swastika [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tell me: do you still trust Google trends - dnlocal</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/14/google-trends-subverted-again/comment-page-2/#comment-2414633</link>
		<dc:creator>Tell me: do you still trust Google trends - dnlocal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 17:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19969#comment-2414633</guid>
		<description>[...] me: do you still trust Google trends       Google Trends Subverted Again. This Is Getting (ʎllɐǝɹ) Embarrasing  This is really easy to do, since it&#039;s a one time hit on google (using iframe or image tag) for a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] me: do you still trust Google trends       Google Trends Subverted Again. This Is Getting (ʎllɐǝɹ) Embarrasing  This is really easy to do, since it&#8217;s a one time hit on google (using iframe or image tag) for a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Trends Game my.bookmarks</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/14/google-trends-subverted-again/comment-page-2/#comment-2414414</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Trends Game my.bookmarks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 12:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19969#comment-2414414</guid>
		<description>[...] Is Google Trends can be manipulated?(full story) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is Google Trends can be manipulated?(full story) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Trends Gets Gamed - ShoeMoney&#174;</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/14/google-trends-subverted-again/comment-page-2/#comment-2414061</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Trends Gets Gamed - ShoeMoney&#174;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 02:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19969#comment-2414061</guid>
		<description>[...] poop at work” (which made it at least to No. 10). That is after the top result this morning was “ǝlƃooƃ noʎ ʞɔnɟ.” And last week, there was the swastika [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] poop at work” (which made it at least to No. 10). That is after the top result this morning was “ǝlƃooƃ noʎ ʞɔnɟ.” And last week, there was the swastika [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sanzneko</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/14/google-trends-subverted-again/comment-page-1/#comment-2412958</link>
		<dc:creator>Sanzneko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 02:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19969#comment-2412958</guid>
		<description>Well that&#039;s an obvious lie. 4chan bans any one who raids or promotes destructive acts. You&#039;re obviously from Ebaumsworld.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well that&#8217;s an obvious lie. 4chan bans any one who raids or promotes destructive acts. You&#8217;re obviously from Ebaumsworld.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garfield</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/14/google-trends-subverted-again/comment-page-1/#comment-2412953</link>
		<dc:creator>Garfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 02:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19969#comment-2412953</guid>
		<description>Too bad 4chan has nothing to do with attacks like this. Like what the rest of the people here and myself have been saying, Ebaumsworld.com has been and continues to be responsible for hack attacks across the internet like this. They continue to get away with it because they pretend to be from 4chan and do one hell of a job making it seem like it&#039;s 4chan. You can get rid of 4chan all you want, but nothing will happen because the source of the problem is Ebaumsworld.com and their hacker users. They are the problem and to not accept it is to give into their lies and falsehood.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad 4chan has nothing to do with attacks like this. Like what the rest of the people here and myself have been saying, Ebaumsworld.com has been and continues to be responsible for hack attacks across the internet like this. They continue to get away with it because they pretend to be from 4chan and do one hell of a job making it seem like it&#8217;s 4chan. You can get rid of 4chan all you want, but nothing will happen because the source of the problem is Ebaumsworld.com and their hacker users. They are the problem and to not accept it is to give into their lies and falsehood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garfield</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/14/google-trends-subverted-again/comment-page-1/#comment-2412949</link>
		<dc:creator>Garfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 02:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19969#comment-2412949</guid>
		<description>Ebaumsworld.com is behind this trying to blame it on 4chan like always. I wish the media would wake up and realize that Ebaumsworld users are the ones behind hack attacks like this and they ALWAYS blame 4chan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ebaumsworld.com is behind this trying to blame it on 4chan like always. I wish the media would wake up and realize that Ebaumsworld users are the ones behind hack attacks like this and they ALWAYS blame 4chan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rolled</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/14/google-trends-subverted-again/comment-page-1/#comment-2411422</link>
		<dc:creator>rolled</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 18:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19969#comment-2411422</guid>
		<description>rick astley did it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rick astley did it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ali</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/14/google-trends-subverted-again/comment-page-2/#comment-2410000</link>
		<dc:creator>Ali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 09:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19969#comment-2410000</guid>
		<description>Wat


sent from: fav.or.it [FID640263]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wat</p>
<p>sent from: fav.or.it [FID640263]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buy wow account</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/14/google-trends-subverted-again/comment-page-2/#comment-2409991</link>
		<dc:creator>buy wow account</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 09:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19969#comment-2409991</guid>
		<description>so sweet!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so sweet!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
