<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jingle Networks Proves Their Free Business Model Works</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/25/jingle-networks-proves-their-free-business-model-works/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/25/jingle-networks-proves-their-free-business-model-works/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:50:56 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SREEPARNA DAS</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/25/jingle-networks-proves-their-free-business-model-works/comment-page-1/#comment-2545146</link>
		<dc:creator>SREEPARNA DAS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 14:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19338#comment-2545146</guid>
		<description>REAL AD POSTING JOB FOR HOME BASED. (GNE128)
THIS TIME FOR YOU TO MAKE THAT CHANGE IN YOUR LIFE. WOULD NOT IT BE GREAT TO WORK FROM HOME AT YOUR OWN COMPUTER THROUGH INTERNET. NOTHING WILL CHANGE FOR YOU UNLESS YOU TAKE THE FIRST STEP. FOR MORE DETAILS : http://www.golden-netjob.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>REAL AD POSTING JOB FOR HOME BASED. (GNE128)<br />
THIS TIME FOR YOU TO MAKE THAT CHANGE IN YOUR LIFE. WOULD NOT IT BE GREAT TO WORK FROM HOME AT YOUR OWN COMPUTER THROUGH INTERNET. NOTHING WILL CHANGE FOR YOU UNLESS YOU TAKE THE FIRST STEP. FOR MORE DETAILS : <a href="http://www.golden-netjob.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.golden-netjob.com'>http://www.golden-netjob.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dqsvmulwr abfqcdn</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/25/jingle-networks-proves-their-free-business-model-works/comment-page-1/#comment-2405678</link>
		<dc:creator>dqsvmulwr abfqcdn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 13:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19338#comment-2405678</guid>
		<description>nqtbpe cehxnzi ftjkbe csdxek pjzw qxwbicfy jyqpdsrg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nqtbpe cehxnzi ftjkbe csdxek pjzw qxwbicfy jyqpdsrg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: suyog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/25/jingle-networks-proves-their-free-business-model-works/comment-page-1/#comment-2404075</link>
		<dc:creator>suyog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 06:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19338#comment-2404075</guid>
		<description>Company is now hiring home-based workers. Worldwide Position Open. Visit: 
http://www.Worldwideadtypist.net /refid.asp?suyogAND mailto : suyogwalve@yahoo.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Company is now hiring home-based workers. Worldwide Position Open. Visit:<br />
<a href="http://www.Worldwideadtypist.net" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.Worldwideadtypist.net'>http://www.Worl...ideadtypist.net</a> /refid.asp?suyogAND mailto : <a href="mailto:suyogwalve@yahoo.com">suyogwalve@yahoo.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boston_geek</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/25/jingle-networks-proves-their-free-business-model-works/comment-page-1/#comment-2391728</link>
		<dc:creator>boston_geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 02:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19338#comment-2391728</guid>
		<description>I agree. Looking at the bios of the guys left, they never built a real company nor do they know how to run one.  They sold the last thing as speculative tech.   And this isn&#039;t a tech company per se and it appears the tech area is the problem, not well managed since they need different senior people in Boston. Some people learned the wrong lessons in the last dot com boom.

No one is left that has any experience in running a company. This is already over.  The &quot;fat&quot; man will sing, but it will be a nasal-toned scream of desperation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. Looking at the bios of the guys left, they never built a real company nor do they know how to run one.  They sold the last thing as speculative tech.   And this isn&#8217;t a tech company per se and it appears the tech area is the problem, not well managed since they need different senior people in Boston. Some people learned the wrong lessons in the last dot com boom.</p>
<p>No one is left that has any experience in running a company. This is already over.  The &#8220;fat&#8221; man will sing, but it will be a nasal-toned scream of desperation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: another_turd_circa_dot_com_bust</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/25/jingle-networks-proves-their-free-business-model-works/comment-page-1/#comment-2390907</link>
		<dc:creator>another_turd_circa_dot_com_bust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 18:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19338#comment-2390907</guid>
		<description>So let me see if I understand this. Garrick leaves because the company is &quot;based in Boston.&quot; They need a leader in Boston. So the new CEO is from Boston, right. Wrong Detroit, 1000 miles away.

So the President is in Boston, right. Wrong, he&#039;s in New York. Something stinks in Denmark.  This company expanded, brought in outside talent, that talent brought in money and now all the outsiders have left. HMMM?

Next announcment: It was sold, but they won&#039;t tell you for how much. 

This dog don&#039;t hunt, it&#039;s too obese.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So let me see if I understand this. Garrick leaves because the company is &#8220;based in Boston.&#8221; They need a leader in Boston. So the new CEO is from Boston, right. Wrong Detroit, 1000 miles away.</p>
<p>So the President is in Boston, right. Wrong, he&#8217;s in New York. Something stinks in Denmark.  This company expanded, brought in outside talent, that talent brought in money and now all the outsiders have left. HMMM?</p>
<p>Next announcment: It was sold, but they won&#8217;t tell you for how much. </p>
<p>This dog don&#8217;t hunt, it&#8217;s too obese.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: waddling_fatso</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/25/jingle-networks-proves-their-free-business-model-works/comment-page-1/#comment-2390885</link>
		<dc:creator>waddling_fatso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 18:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19338#comment-2390885</guid>
		<description>What a joke. First they are going to sell themselves for $175 million. Then they&#039;re going to go IPO. Then their CEO quits? Announcing you finally have a positive gross margin says &quot;we were giving it a way for less than cost and after $75 million in investment and three years, we finally figured out how to make 1/4 cent on what we sell, but we we still lose money on the bottom line and can&#039;t pay the bills&quot;. LOL

It&#039;s a turd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a joke. First they are going to sell themselves for $175 million. Then they&#8217;re going to go IPO. Then their CEO quits? Announcing you finally have a positive gross margin says &#8220;we were giving it a way for less than cost and after $75 million in investment and three years, we finally figured out how to make 1/4 cent on what we sell, but we we still lose money on the bottom line and can&#8217;t pay the bills&#8221;. LOL</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a turd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/25/jingle-networks-proves-their-free-business-model-works/comment-page-1/#comment-2389414</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 03:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19338#comment-2389414</guid>
		<description>&quot;They reportedly answer for calls per month than all of those competitors combined.&quot;

Is this a typo of &quot;four&quot; or &quot;more&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;They reportedly answer for calls per month than all of those competitors combined.&#8221;</p>
<p>Is this a typo of &#8220;four&#8221; or &#8220;more&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: what</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/25/jingle-networks-proves-their-free-business-model-works/comment-page-1/#comment-2389320</link>
		<dc:creator>what</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 01:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19338#comment-2389320</guid>
		<description>LOL Michael (19). Volume != percentage. When someone says &quot;big chunk&quot; they are implying MARKET SHARE, not VOLUME. 5%, no matter how you describe it or how much emphasis you use it not a &quot;big chunk&quot; of a market with (relatively) few players, many of them pretty new. 

You are using the flawed argument of &quot;you go match that then we&#039;ll see&quot; - did I say I could do better? No. I&#039;m simply analyzing their situation versus Arrington&#039;s assessment of it. 

It&#039;s true, they do have a lot of volume, and they actually have me as a customer as well. This isn&#039;t about the product, this is about exaggerating their place in the industry. They are a big company, and growing, but it&#039;s clear that based on their financing they still have a ways to go, and perhaps new methods of monetization to develop to make it there. 

And no, I don&#039;t wish I had a job answering 411 calls. Plus, you are grossly minimizing the business expenditures they have (hint: $75 million in funding usually doesn&#039;t go to companies with &quot;not much overhead&quot;). Maybe you should look into how much it costs to successfully sell ads and market a product on a national level.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL Michael (19). Volume != percentage. When someone says &#8220;big chunk&#8221; they are implying MARKET SHARE, not VOLUME. 5%, no matter how you describe it or how much emphasis you use it not a &#8220;big chunk&#8221; of a market with (relatively) few players, many of them pretty new. </p>
<p>You are using the flawed argument of &#8220;you go match that then we&#8217;ll see&#8221; &#8211; did I say I could do better? No. I&#8217;m simply analyzing their situation versus Arrington&#8217;s assessment of it. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s true, they do have a lot of volume, and they actually have me as a customer as well. This isn&#8217;t about the product, this is about exaggerating their place in the industry. They are a big company, and growing, but it&#8217;s clear that based on their financing they still have a ways to go, and perhaps new methods of monetization to develop to make it there. </p>
<p>And no, I don&#8217;t wish I had a job answering 411 calls. Plus, you are grossly minimizing the business expenditures they have (hint: $75 million in funding usually doesn&#8217;t go to companies with &#8220;not much overhead&#8221;). Maybe you should look into how much it costs to successfully sell ads and market a product on a national level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/25/jingle-networks-proves-their-free-business-model-works/comment-page-1/#comment-2388974</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19338#comment-2388974</guid>
		<description>What

You are an idiot. 5% of 6 Billion is 300 million, that is a very significant number of calls per year. You come up with a way to get that many calls per year - then come back and share with us. The only thing the company needs to run the system is a server connected to the free411 line someone to market for them and someone to sell advertisements. Not much overhead if you ask me. They don&#039;t even need an office space, everyone could work from home. I&#039;ll bet you wished you could have a job like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What</p>
<p>You are an idiot. 5% of 6 Billion is 300 million, that is a very significant number of calls per year. You come up with a way to get that many calls per year &#8211; then come back and share with us. The only thing the company needs to run the system is a server connected to the free411 line someone to market for them and someone to sell advertisements. Not much overhead if you ask me. They don&#8217;t even need an office space, everyone could work from home. I&#8217;ll bet you wished you could have a job like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yawn</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/25/jingle-networks-proves-their-free-business-model-works/comment-page-1/#comment-2388939</link>
		<dc:creator>Yawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19338#comment-2388939</guid>
		<description>Wait Paul, you don&#039;t have a business model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait Paul, you don&#8217;t have a business model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PaulFromJingle</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/25/jingle-networks-proves-their-free-business-model-works/comment-page-1/#comment-2388920</link>
		<dc:creator>PaulFromJingle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 19:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19338#comment-2388920</guid>
		<description>Like I said, guys, I&#039;m not going to get into any of the financial stuff -- you guys can discuss that.  I just wanted to point out that it&#039;s the good service as much as the business model that&#039;s been key to our success.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like I said, guys, I&#8217;m not going to get into any of the financial stuff &#8212; you guys can discuss that.  I just wanted to point out that it&#8217;s the good service as much as the business model that&#8217;s been key to our success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NotPaulFromNotJingle</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/25/jingle-networks-proves-their-free-business-model-works/comment-page-1/#comment-2388888</link>
		<dc:creator>NotPaulFromNotJingle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 19:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19338#comment-2388888</guid>
		<description>Hey Paul,

Why&#039;d you drop operator roll over?

Why&#039;d George leave?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Paul,</p>
<p>Why&#8217;d you drop operator roll over?</p>
<p>Why&#8217;d George leave?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yawn</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/25/jingle-networks-proves-their-free-business-model-works/comment-page-1/#comment-2388866</link>
		<dc:creator>Yawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 19:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19338#comment-2388866</guid>
		<description>@ 14 PaulFromJingle

Again, that&#039;s like saying &quot;Delta flies to 200 cities!  Yay!  But we lost $2 billion!  Yay!  We fly to so many cities!&quot;

Seriously guys, figure out a model that works and then try pulling a fast one on us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ 14 PaulFromJingle</p>
<p>Again, that&#8217;s like saying &#8220;Delta flies to 200 cities!  Yay!  But we lost $2 billion!  Yay!  We fly to so many cities!&#8221;</p>
<p>Seriously guys, figure out a model that works and then try pulling a fast one on us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PaulFromJingle</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/25/jingle-networks-proves-their-free-business-model-works/comment-page-1/#comment-2388862</link>
		<dc:creator>PaulFromJingle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 19:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19338#comment-2388862</guid>
		<description>Hi everyone,

Paul from 1-800-FREE411 here.  I&#039;m not going to get into the financial stuff, but would rather just add that it&#039;s our range of services that&#039;s put us out in front: our number offers business, gov&#039;t, and residential listings (most of our competitors offer only business listings), you can search by name or by category, you can use the number via Skype, and you can get driving directions texted to you immediately following a call.  Of course, our business model works well, but it&#039;s also the high quality of the call experience that has led to success.

Thanks,
Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi everyone,</p>
<p>Paul from 1-800-FREE411 here.  I&#8217;m not going to get into the financial stuff, but would rather just add that it&#8217;s our range of services that&#8217;s put us out in front: our number offers business, gov&#8217;t, and residential listings (most of our competitors offer only business listings), you can search by name or by category, you can use the number via Skype, and you can get driving directions texted to you immediately following a call.  Of course, our business model works well, but it&#8217;s also the high quality of the call experience that has led to success.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChaCha</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/25/jingle-networks-proves-their-free-business-model-works/comment-page-1/#comment-2388689</link>
		<dc:creator>ChaCha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 17:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19338#comment-2388689</guid>
		<description>Just to promote another service, which, by the way Micheal hates (he&#039;ll come around though), is ChaCha.

You can text 242-242 or call 1.800.224.2242 (1.800.2.ChaCha) and ask ANY question you like.  

They also offer super quick stock quotes.  Text s plus the ticker name or company name (ex. &quot;s appl&quot; or &quot;s goog&quot;).

Theres weather.  Text w and a city name or zip code (ex. w 95015 or w Chicago, IL)

And business info.  Text bus businessName in cityName (ex. bus Apple in Cuppertino, CA)

And you can also call and ask these directly.  

And is FREE!!

How can you not like this service?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to promote another service, which, by the way Micheal hates (he&#8217;ll come around though), is ChaCha.</p>
<p>You can text 242-242 or call 1.800.224.2242 (1.800.2.ChaCha) and ask ANY question you like.  </p>
<p>They also offer super quick stock quotes.  Text s plus the ticker name or company name (ex. &#8220;s appl&#8221; or &#8220;s goog&#8221;).</p>
<p>Theres weather.  Text w and a city name or zip code (ex. w 95015 or w Chicago, IL)</p>
<p>And business info.  Text bus businessName in cityName (ex. bus Apple in Cuppertino, CA)</p>
<p>And you can also call and ask these directly.  </p>
<p>And is FREE!!</p>
<p>How can you not like this service?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yawn</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/25/jingle-networks-proves-their-free-business-model-works/comment-page-1/#comment-2388601</link>
		<dc:creator>Yawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 15:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19338#comment-2388601</guid>
		<description>Haha another example of how Tech people don&#039;t understand business.  Just because you make $0.10 per call doesn&#039;t &quot;validate your business model&quot;.  That would be like saying that United and Delta&#039;s business model is &quot;validated&quot; by the fact people pay $100 for an airline ticket.

You have to make a profit.  Jingle is a failure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha another example of how Tech people don&#8217;t understand business.  Just because you make $0.10 per call doesn&#8217;t &#8220;validate your business model&#8221;.  That would be like saying that United and Delta&#8217;s business model is &#8220;validated&#8221; by the fact people pay $100 for an airline ticket.</p>
<p>You have to make a profit.  Jingle is a failure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free 411 &#124; Bronte Media</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/25/jingle-networks-proves-their-free-business-model-works/comment-page-1/#comment-2388508</link>
		<dc:creator>Free 411 &#124; Bronte Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19338#comment-2388508</guid>
		<description>[...] Color me skeptical. Jingle, the free 411 provider, is saying that they are profitable on a per call basis. And at the same time they are announcing the CEO is leaving, they are closing down their California office and they are re-organizing. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Color me skeptical. Jingle, the free 411 provider, is saying that they are profitable on a per call basis. And at the same time they are announcing the CEO is leaving, they are closing down their California office and they are re-organizing. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Math Common Sense</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/25/jingle-networks-proves-their-free-business-model-works/comment-page-1/#comment-2388434</link>
		<dc:creator>Math Common Sense</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19338#comment-2388434</guid>
		<description>Fake Nick Gonzales: that&#039;s $30m recurring revenue that they&#039;re losing money on. I guess they&#039;ll make it up in volume, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fake Nick Gonzales: that&#8217;s $30m recurring revenue that they&#8217;re losing money on. I guess they&#8217;ll make it up in volume, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hawk</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/25/jingle-networks-proves-their-free-business-model-works/comment-page-1/#comment-2388350</link>
		<dc:creator>Hawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 11:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19338#comment-2388350</guid>
		<description>What is surprising here is that this model seems to be a bit behind times, even by Indian standards. In India, there is a popular service called Just Dial (funded by Tiger Global and SBAIF) which is similar to the US&#039; free-411 service. They were doing ads as a revenue model a few years back but there was quite a bit of user dissatisfaction and they have scuttled it. Now they are completely on a paid inclusion and pay on lead. It is surprising that in the US they are still running ads on the phone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is surprising here is that this model seems to be a bit behind times, even by Indian standards. In India, there is a popular service called Just Dial (funded by Tiger Global and SBAIF) which is similar to the US&#8217; free-411 service. They were doing ads as a revenue model a few years back but there was quite a bit of user dissatisfaction and they have scuttled it. Now they are completely on a paid inclusion and pay on lead. It is surprising that in the US they are still running ads on the phone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; Jingle Networksが無料ビジネスモデルを実証</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/25/jingle-networks-proves-their-free-business-model-works/comment-page-1/#comment-2388219</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; Jingle Networksが無料ビジネスモデルを実証</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 09:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19338#comment-2388219</guid>
		<description>[...] [原文へ] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [原文へ] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter s</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/25/jingle-networks-proves-their-free-business-model-works/comment-page-1/#comment-2388216</link>
		<dc:creator>peter s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 09:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19338#comment-2388216</guid>
		<description>This article needs a bit of copy editing:
- &quot;which prompt customers be connected to a similar company &quot; is missing a word (&quot;to be&quot;, not just &quot;be&quot;).
- &quot;They reportedly answer for calls per month than all of those competitors combined.&quot; appears to be missing te word &quot;more&quot; (or is it &quot;less&quot;?).

Perhaps copy editing is just another casualty of &quot;web publishing&quot;? What next - dropping all vowels, leaving only the consonants?
To me, it is a pity that this mars an otherwise very good site. At least use a grammar checker, in addition to (I assume) the use of a spelling checker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article needs a bit of copy editing:<br />
- &#8220;which prompt customers be connected to a similar company &#8221; is missing a word (&#8221;to be&#8221;, not just &#8220;be&#8221;).<br />
- &#8220;They reportedly answer for calls per month than all of those competitors combined.&#8221; appears to be missing te word &#8220;more&#8221; (or is it &#8220;less&#8221;?).</p>
<p>Perhaps copy editing is just another casualty of &#8220;web publishing&#8221;? What next &#8211; dropping all vowels, leaving only the consonants?<br />
To me, it is a pity that this mars an otherwise very good site. At least use a grammar checker, in addition to (I assume) the use of a spelling checker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/25/jingle-networks-proves-their-free-business-model-works/comment-page-1/#comment-2388178</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 08:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19338#comment-2388178</guid>
		<description>@what - For example, Apple has about a 7% market share and for them even going to 10% is a &quot;huge chunk&quot; by most people&#039;s perspective</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@what &#8211; For example, Apple has about a 7% market share and for them even going to 10% is a &#8220;huge chunk&#8221; by most people&#8217;s perspective</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Arrington</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/25/jingle-networks-proves-their-free-business-model-works/comment-page-1/#comment-2388144</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Arrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 08:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19338#comment-2388144</guid>
		<description>&quot;what&quot; - take a breath, chill. And then listen to the podcast interview that I linked to if you want all the details on their cost structure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;what&#8221; &#8211; take a breath, chill. And then listen to the podcast interview that I linked to if you want all the details on their cost structure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fake Nick Gonzales</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/25/jingle-networks-proves-their-free-business-model-works/comment-page-1/#comment-2388120</link>
		<dc:creator>Fake Nick Gonzales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 07:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19338#comment-2388120</guid>
		<description>Math Genius, you are unfortunately not. Think before you hate.

That&#039;s 5% of 6B calls PER YEAR. That means $30M recurring revenue annually on a TOTAL of $75m raised.

If the company is marginally profitable on each call as they claim, and presuming they continue to gain market share without dramatically increasing burn, they could very possibly reach break even in the medium-term future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Math Genius, you are unfortunately not. Think before you hate.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s 5% of 6B calls PER YEAR. That means $30M recurring revenue annually on a TOTAL of $75m raised.</p>
<p>If the company is marginally profitable on each call as they claim, and presuming they continue to gain market share without dramatically increasing burn, they could very possibly reach break even in the medium-term future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura Iriarte</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/25/jingle-networks-proves-their-free-business-model-works/comment-page-1/#comment-2388098</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Iriarte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 06:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19338#comment-2388098</guid>
		<description>I use the free 411 service all the time!  1-800-free411!  i did have trouble finding something last week once but usually it works fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use the free 411 service all the time!  1-800-free411!  i did have trouble finding something last week once but usually it works fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
