<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tech Policy Poll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/24/tech-policy-poll/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/24/tech-policy-poll/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 01:13:35 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Its Rockin &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The GOP Launches Site (And Facebook App) To Solicit Policy Proposals. Why Aren’t the Democrats Doing This?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/24/tech-policy-poll/comment-page-2/#comment-2408623</link>
		<dc:creator>Its Rockin &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The GOP Launches Site (And Facebook App) To Solicit Policy Proposals. Why Aren’t the Democrats Doing This?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 01:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19273#comment-2408623</guid>
		<description>[...] The GOP wants you to help it figure out its party platform. Today, the Republican Platform Committee launched a site to gather comments and policy suggestions directly from the party faithful (and anyone else willing to give up their e-mail address). They also launched a corresponding Facebook app. The idea ostensibly is to gather feedback and debate about policy issues such as national security, energy and gas prices, health care reform, judicial nominations, and that old crowd pleaser &#8220;Protecting American Values.&#8221; Where&#8217;s the technology plank? Here are a few resources for them to start thinking about what tech policies we need. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The GOP wants you to help it figure out its party platform. Today, the Republican Platform Committee launched a site to gather comments and policy suggestions directly from the party faithful (and anyone else willing to give up their e-mail address). They also launched a corresponding Facebook app. The idea ostensibly is to gather feedback and debate about policy issues such as national security, energy and gas prices, health care reform, judicial nominations, and that old crowd pleaser &#8220;Protecting American Values.&#8221; Where&#8217;s the technology plank? Here are a few resources for them to start thinking about what tech policies we need. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The GOP Launches Site (And Facebook App) To Solicit Policy Proposals. Why Aren’t the Democrats Doing This? &#124; NewsMeToday</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/24/tech-policy-poll/comment-page-2/#comment-2407510</link>
		<dc:creator>The GOP Launches Site (And Facebook App) To Solicit Policy Proposals. Why Aren’t the Democrats Doing This? &#124; NewsMeToday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 22:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19273#comment-2407510</guid>
		<description>[...] The GOP wants you to help it figure out its party platform. Today, the Republican Platform Committee launched a site to gather comments and policy suggestions directly from the party faithful (and anyone else willing to give up their e-mail address). They also launched a corresponding Facebook app. The idea ostensibly is to gather feedback and debate about policy issues such as national security, energy and gas prices, health care reform, judicial nominations, and that old crowd pleaser &#8220;Protecting American Values.&#8221; Where&#8217;s the technology plank? Here are a few resources for them to start thinking about what tech policies we need. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The GOP wants you to help it figure out its party platform. Today, the Republican Platform Committee launched a site to gather comments and policy suggestions directly from the party faithful (and anyone else willing to give up their e-mail address). They also launched a corresponding Facebook app. The idea ostensibly is to gather feedback and debate about policy issues such as national security, energy and gas prices, health care reform, judicial nominations, and that old crowd pleaser &#8220;Protecting American Values.&#8221; Where&#8217;s the technology plank? Here are a few resources for them to start thinking about what tech policies we need. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; 共和党が政策提案サイトを立ち上げ（民主党は？）</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/24/tech-policy-poll/comment-page-2/#comment-2407030</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; 共和党が政策提案サイトを立ち上げ（民主党は？）</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 23:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19273#comment-2407030</guid>
		<description>[...] 共和党は、党の綱領の策定のために一般市民からのアイデアを求めている。今日、共和党綱領委員会は、支持者たち（メールアドレスを公開する意思のある人なら誰でもよい）から意見や政策提案を募るためのサイトを立ち上げた。同委員会は同時に、このサイトのためのFacebookアプリケーションをスタートした。その建前は、国防やエネルギー価格、健康保険の改革、判事の任命問題、そして年配層が好む“アメリカ的価値観の保全”といった政策課題について、意見や議論を集めることだ。あれ、科学技術がないよ。彼らが科学技術分野の必要政策課題について考えるためには、こんなサイトをおすすめしたいね。 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 共和党は、党の綱領の策定のために一般市民からのアイデアを求めている。今日、共和党綱領委員会は、支持者たち（メールアドレスを公開する意思のある人なら誰でもよい）から意見や政策提案を募るためのサイトを立ち上げた。同委員会は同時に、このサイトのためのFacebookアプリケーションをスタートした。その建前は、国防やエネルギー価格、健康保険の改革、判事の任命問題、そして年配層が好む“アメリカ的価値観の保全”といった政策課題について、意見や議論を集めることだ。あれ、科学技術がないよ。彼らが科学技術分野の必要政策課題について考えるためには、こんなサイトをおすすめしたいね。 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/24/tech-policy-poll/comment-page-2/#comment-2406469</link>
		<dc:creator>Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 00:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19273#comment-2406469</guid>
		<description>Make the federal R&amp;D tax credit permanent.  Now.  The pols have been dickering on this too long.

Also, increase the NSF and NIH budgets for basic research.

Cut social security benefits for everyone under 50 now, raise the retirement age a couple years and levy the ss tax on higher incomes (over $250k/yr).  Yes, I know not a tech issue but ss and medicare need serious reform before the boomers bankrupt the system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Make the federal R&amp;D tax credit permanent.  Now.  The pols have been dickering on this too long.</p>
<p>Also, increase the NSF and NIH budgets for basic research.</p>
<p>Cut social security benefits for everyone under 50 now, raise the retirement age a couple years and levy the ss tax on higher incomes (over $250k/yr).  Yes, I know not a tech issue but ss and medicare need serious reform before the boomers bankrupt the system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shopyield.com &#8250; Bottoms up&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/24/tech-policy-poll/comment-page-2/#comment-2405973</link>
		<dc:creator>shopyield.com &#8250; Bottoms up&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 17:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19273#comment-2405973</guid>
		<description>[...] Where’s the technology plank? Here are a few resources for them to start thinking about what tech policies we need&#8230;.&#8221;~~~~    This was written by Cate Long. Posted on Friday, July 11, 2008, at 1:25 pm. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Where’s the technology plank? Here are a few resources for them to start thinking about what tech policies we need&#8230;.&#8221;~~~~    This was written by Cate Long. Posted on Friday, July 11, 2008, at 1:25 pm. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/24/tech-policy-poll/comment-page-2/#comment-2405963</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 17:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19273#comment-2405963</guid>
		<description>I think that this list misses the item that could have the biggest economic impact - fiber everywhere.  Ubiquitous fiber would relieve traffic on roads, would provide a platform that would make at-home learning from video an everyday phenomenon for anyone that cared to engage in it, and would open up so many other economically beneficial possibilities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that this list misses the item that could have the biggest economic impact &#8211; fiber everywhere.  Ubiquitous fiber would relieve traffic on roads, would provide a platform that would make at-home learning from video an everyday phenomenon for anyone that cared to engage in it, and would open up so many other economically beneficial possibilities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The GOP Launches Site (And Facebook App) To Solicit Policy Proposals. Why Aren’t the Democrats Doing This? &#124; All tech stuff</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/24/tech-policy-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-2405959</link>
		<dc:creator>The GOP Launches Site (And Facebook App) To Solicit Policy Proposals. Why Aren’t the Democrats Doing This? &#124; All tech stuff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 17:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19273#comment-2405959</guid>
		<description>[...] The GOP wants you to help it figure out its party platform. Today, the Republican Platform Committee launched a site to gather comments and policy suggestions directly from the party faithful (and anyone else willing to give up their e-mail address). They also launched a corresponding Facebook app. The idea ostensibly is to gather feedback and debate about policy issues such as national security, energy and gas prices, health care reform, judicial nominations, and that old crowd pleaser &#8220;Protecting American Values.&#8221; Where&#8217;s the technology plank? Here are a few resources for them to start thinking about what tech policies we need. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The GOP wants you to help it figure out its party platform. Today, the Republican Platform Committee launched a site to gather comments and policy suggestions directly from the party faithful (and anyone else willing to give up their e-mail address). They also launched a corresponding Facebook app. The idea ostensibly is to gather feedback and debate about policy issues such as national security, energy and gas prices, health care reform, judicial nominations, and that old crowd pleaser &#8220;Protecting American Values.&#8221; Where&#8217;s the technology plank? Here are a few resources for them to start thinking about what tech policies we need. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Infotron &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The GOP Launches Site (And Facebook App) To Solicit Policy Proposals. Why Aren’t the Democrats Doing This?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/24/tech-policy-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-2405877</link>
		<dc:creator>Infotron &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The GOP Launches Site (And Facebook App) To Solicit Policy Proposals. Why Aren’t the Democrats Doing This?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19273#comment-2405877</guid>
		<description>[...] The GOP wants you to help it figure out its party platform. Today, the Republican Platform Committee launched a site to gather comments and policy suggestions directly from the party faithful (and anyone else willing to give up their e-mail address). They also launched a corresponding Facebook app. The idea ostensibly is to gather feedback and debate about policy issues such as national security, energy and gas prices, health care reform, judicial nominations, and that old crowd pleaser &#8220;Protecting American Values.&#8221; Where&#8217;s the technology plank? Here are a few resources for them to start thinking about what tech policies we need. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The GOP wants you to help it figure out its party platform. Today, the Republican Platform Committee launched a site to gather comments and policy suggestions directly from the party faithful (and anyone else willing to give up their e-mail address). They also launched a corresponding Facebook app. The idea ostensibly is to gather feedback and debate about policy issues such as national security, energy and gas prices, health care reform, judicial nominations, and that old crowd pleaser &#8220;Protecting American Values.&#8221; Where&#8217;s the technology plank? Here are a few resources for them to start thinking about what tech policies we need. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Infotron &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The GOP Launches Site (And Facebook App) To Solicit Policy Proposals From The Public. Why Aren’t the Democrats Doing This?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/24/tech-policy-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-2405870</link>
		<dc:creator>Infotron &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The GOP Launches Site (And Facebook App) To Solicit Policy Proposals From The Public. Why Aren’t the Democrats Doing This?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19273#comment-2405870</guid>
		<description>[...] The GOP wants you to help it figure out its party platform. Today, the Republican Platform Committee launched a site to gather comments and policy suggestions directly from the party faithful (and anyone else willing to give up their e-mail address). They also launched a corresponding Facebook app. The idea ostensibly is to gather feedback and debate about policy issues such as national security, energy and gas prices, health care reform, judicial nominations, and that old crowd pleaser &#8220;Protecting American Values.&#8221; Where&#8217;s the technology plank? Here are a few resources for them to start thinking about what tech policies we need. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The GOP wants you to help it figure out its party platform. Today, the Republican Platform Committee launched a site to gather comments and policy suggestions directly from the party faithful (and anyone else willing to give up their e-mail address). They also launched a corresponding Facebook app. The idea ostensibly is to gather feedback and debate about policy issues such as national security, energy and gas prices, health care reform, judicial nominations, and that old crowd pleaser &#8220;Protecting American Values.&#8221; Where&#8217;s the technology plank? Here are a few resources for them to start thinking about what tech policies we need. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The GOP Launches Site (And Facebook App) To Solicit Policy Proposals From The Public. Why Aren&#8217;t the Democrats Doing This?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/24/tech-policy-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-2405855</link>
		<dc:creator>The GOP Launches Site (And Facebook App) To Solicit Policy Proposals From The Public. Why Aren&#8217;t the Democrats Doing This?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19273#comment-2405855</guid>
		<description>[...] The GOP wants you to help it figure out its party platform. Today, the Republican Platform Committee launched a site to gather comments and policy suggestions directly from the party faithful (and anyone else willing to give up their e-mail address). They also launched a corresponding Facebook app. The idea ostensibly is to gather feedback and debate about policy issues such as national security, energy and gas prices, health care reform, judicial nominations, and that old crowd pleaser &#8220;Protecting American Values.&#8221; Where&#8217;s the technology plank? Here are a few resources for them to start thinking about what tech policies we need. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The GOP wants you to help it figure out its party platform. Today, the Republican Platform Committee launched a site to gather comments and policy suggestions directly from the party faithful (and anyone else willing to give up their e-mail address). They also launched a corresponding Facebook app. The idea ostensibly is to gather feedback and debate about policy issues such as national security, energy and gas prices, health care reform, judicial nominations, and that old crowd pleaser &#8220;Protecting American Values.&#8221; Where&#8217;s the technology plank? Here are a few resources for them to start thinking about what tech policies we need. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/24/tech-policy-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-2386767</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 07:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19273#comment-2386767</guid>
		<description>&quot;Marc Andreessen says:  I would advocate unlimited H1B’s for anyone college educated (”brain drain the world”)&quot;

My view of Mr. Andreessen has seriously gone down, does he really think that the Great USA should take all the educated people, especially from the poor countries, so that the rich can get richer and the poor get poorer?

I thought Mr. Andreessen, given his background and assumed intelligence,  had a global view rather than this &#039;us and them&#039; backwards view he seems to have let slip.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Marc Andreessen says:  I would advocate unlimited H1B’s for anyone college educated (”brain drain the world”)&#8221;</p>
<p>My view of Mr. Andreessen has seriously gone down, does he really think that the Great USA should take all the educated people, especially from the poor countries, so that the rich can get richer and the poor get poorer?</p>
<p>I thought Mr. Andreessen, given his background and assumed intelligence,  had a global view rather than this &#8216;us and them&#8217; backwards view he seems to have let slip.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/24/tech-policy-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-2386604</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 03:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19273#comment-2386604</guid>
		<description>@Luther I think the reason people are suggesting patent reform is because patents as they stand do just as much to hinder new businesses/technologies as they do to help them. Reforming them (not abolishing them) could help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Luther I think the reason people are suggesting patent reform is because patents as they stand do just as much to hinder new businesses/technologies as they do to help them. Reforming them (not abolishing them) could help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/24/tech-policy-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-2386570</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 02:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19273#comment-2386570</guid>
		<description>You spoke at a &quot;Personal DEMOCRACY Forum&quot;...

I hope &quot;Error-proof voting machines&quot; came up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You spoke at a &#8220;Personal DEMOCRACY Forum&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>I hope &#8220;Error-proof voting machines&#8221; came up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: professor8</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/24/tech-policy-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-2386563</link>
		<dc:creator>professor8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 02:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19273#comment-2386563</guid>
		<description>Well, if the question is literally which if that limited number would have the most impact, I&#039;d have to say increasing the numbers of H-1B visas would have the biggest negative impact.  Cutting the numbers of student and guest-work visas and bringing in something resembling market prices for visas of all kinds -- restricting them to the truly best and brightest -- would have the biggest positive impact.

There should be at least one non-academic, non-executive engineer on the FCC, and at DoL, DHS, DoJ, DoD... but I doubt they&#039;d have much impact.

There should be more competition in telecomm, and less regulated/protected monopoly in utilities of all kinds.  This would open up the way for increased band-width all across the country.

So, largely, I&#039;m agreeing with Morgan.  These are all problems created by past and current government meddling, so the correction is to reduce the government meddling, get them out of these areas in such a way as to increase REAL competition, and leave US citizens alone to work them out the rest of the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, if the question is literally which if that limited number would have the most impact, I&#8217;d have to say increasing the numbers of H-1B visas would have the biggest negative impact.  Cutting the numbers of student and guest-work visas and bringing in something resembling market prices for visas of all kinds &#8212; restricting them to the truly best and brightest &#8212; would have the biggest positive impact.</p>
<p>There should be at least one non-academic, non-executive engineer on the FCC, and at DoL, DHS, DoJ, DoD&#8230; but I doubt they&#8217;d have much impact.</p>
<p>There should be more competition in telecomm, and less regulated/protected monopoly in utilities of all kinds.  This would open up the way for increased band-width all across the country.</p>
<p>So, largely, I&#8217;m agreeing with Morgan.  These are all problems created by past and current government meddling, so the correction is to reduce the government meddling, get them out of these areas in such a way as to increase REAL competition, and leave US citizens alone to work them out the rest of the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: randy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/24/tech-policy-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-2386272</link>
		<dc:creator>randy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 21:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19273#comment-2386272</guid>
		<description>Just imagine, if these people voting for &quot;renewable energy&quot; were to actually have spent the last twenty years INVESTING in their breakthrough wind and solar generating ideas, rather than continuing on and on romanticizing about funding them with taxpayer money, perhaps their breakthgouh photovoltaic paint with billions of tinsy winsy little nanoscale windmills embedded in it would actually be on the shelf at Lowes at this very moment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just imagine, if these people voting for &#8220;renewable energy&#8221; were to actually have spent the last twenty years INVESTING in their breakthrough wind and solar generating ideas, rather than continuing on and on romanticizing about funding them with taxpayer money, perhaps their breakthgouh photovoltaic paint with billions of tinsy winsy little nanoscale windmills embedded in it would actually be on the shelf at Lowes at this very moment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/24/tech-policy-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-2386240</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 20:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19273#comment-2386240</guid>
		<description>Why nibble at the edges?  Push for proportional representation so the interests of the entire country actually get represented.

The problem is not politics per se.  Its the fact that the money is deciding things.

This will not change until you can actually specify who you want to represent you.  And then actually getting your interests represented by your choice.

We need to rethink this system.  Technology is just one area where we are missing the opportunities and/or ignoring serious threats to our future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why nibble at the edges?  Push for proportional representation so the interests of the entire country actually get represented.</p>
<p>The problem is not politics per se.  Its the fact that the money is deciding things.</p>
<p>This will not change until you can actually specify who you want to represent you.  And then actually getting your interests represented by your choice.</p>
<p>We need to rethink this system.  Technology is just one area where we are missing the opportunities and/or ignoring serious threats to our future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/24/tech-policy-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-2386175</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 20:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19273#comment-2386175</guid>
		<description>Maybe time to invest in a better polling software for this site but seriously adopting open source in govt would be a good idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe time to invest in a better polling software for this site but seriously adopting open source in govt would be a good idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mat J</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/24/tech-policy-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-2386132</link>
		<dc:creator>Mat J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 19:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19273#comment-2386132</guid>
		<description>Luther,

Cheap Useless third worlders ..hmmm..  That is a very strong word. I bet one or two gens back , your DNA also originated from one of those useless third worlds . 

And if you do not know, here also there is absolutely amazing contributions for inventors. Invent something yourself and you can find that out. Or do a Google which alas is also sprung from the minds of some third worlder(s)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luther,</p>
<p>Cheap Useless third worlders ..hmmm..  That is a very strong word. I bet one or two gens back , your DNA also originated from one of those useless third worlds . </p>
<p>And if you do not know, here also there is absolutely amazing contributions for inventors. Invent something yourself and you can find that out. Or do a Google which alas is also sprung from the minds of some third worlder(s)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maggie</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/24/tech-policy-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-2386065</link>
		<dc:creator>maggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19273#comment-2386065</guid>
		<description>Well the question is a bit strange. Reading your post, it would seem that you&#039;re asking which is more important, but the question is about economic impact. Those two have very different answers.

In any case, they&#039;re all important, but the copyright thing is getting out of hand. Yesterday The Consumerist reported that the MPAA is now claiming that they shouldn&#039;t need to proof to sue you. Who do these people think they are?! They must believe that they&#039;re God or something. 

That attitude made me want to make a few copies just for spite. I&#039;ve never done it, but I&#039;m willing to just for the principle of the matter.

The article is here:
http://consumerist.com/tag/mpaa/?i=5018612&amp;t=the-mpaa-says-they-shouldnt-need-proof-to-sue-you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well the question is a bit strange. Reading your post, it would seem that you&#8217;re asking which is more important, but the question is about economic impact. Those two have very different answers.</p>
<p>In any case, they&#8217;re all important, but the copyright thing is getting out of hand. Yesterday The Consumerist reported that the MPAA is now claiming that they shouldn&#8217;t need to proof to sue you. Who do these people think they are?! They must believe that they&#8217;re God or something. </p>
<p>That attitude made me want to make a few copies just for spite. I&#8217;ve never done it, but I&#8217;m willing to just for the principle of the matter.</p>
<p>The article is here:<br />
<a href="http://consumerist.com/tag/mpaa/?i=5018612&amp;t=the-mpaa-says-they-shouldnt-need-proof-to-sue-you" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://consumerist.com/tag/mpaa/?i=5018612&amp;t=the-mpaa-says-they-shouldnt-need-proof-to-sue-you'>http://consumer...roof-to-sue-you</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luther</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/24/tech-policy-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-2386023</link>
		<dc:creator>Luther</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19273#comment-2386023</guid>
		<description>Get rid of &quot;hired to invent.&quot; It should be obvious that no incentive leads to strangulation of innovation. Japan has mandatory compensation for employed inventors, and of course is starting to pull ahead in many areas, such as autos, electronics, robotics, etc.

&quot;Hired to invent&quot; is the equivalent of communism for inventors. A fixed salary is a disincentive, as  one maximizes return on work by doing the least amount of work. For ex., if you make 2 G&#039;s/week and fuck off for 39 hours, then you make 2 G&#039;s/man-hour of work; but if you work 40 hours, then your return on work is only  $50/man-hour of work. This logical analysis guides most scientists, who are very logical.

Without new industries protected by patent and the nearly 20 year headstart afforded by patent protection, static, uninnovative businesses  are forced to compete on the basis of labor costs alone, and the US loses in this competition, which has led to the present policy of inundating the US with legal and illegal immigrants to drive down wages for global competition.

We owed much of our 20th century primacy to great inventors like Thomas Edison, and it is shameful that we treat scientists and engineers as a cheap commodity, bringing in hordes of cheap (and useless) third worlders to ruin job markets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get rid of &#8220;hired to invent.&#8221; It should be obvious that no incentive leads to strangulation of innovation. Japan has mandatory compensation for employed inventors, and of course is starting to pull ahead in many areas, such as autos, electronics, robotics, etc.</p>
<p>&#8220;Hired to invent&#8221; is the equivalent of communism for inventors. A fixed salary is a disincentive, as  one maximizes return on work by doing the least amount of work. For ex., if you make 2 G&#8217;s/week and fuck off for 39 hours, then you make 2 G&#8217;s/man-hour of work; but if you work 40 hours, then your return on work is only  $50/man-hour of work. This logical analysis guides most scientists, who are very logical.</p>
<p>Without new industries protected by patent and the nearly 20 year headstart afforded by patent protection, static, uninnovative businesses  are forced to compete on the basis of labor costs alone, and the US loses in this competition, which has led to the present policy of inundating the US with legal and illegal immigrants to drive down wages for global competition.</p>
<p>We owed much of our 20th century primacy to great inventors like Thomas Edison, and it is shameful that we treat scientists and engineers as a cheap commodity, bringing in hordes of cheap (and useless) third worlders to ruin job markets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Church</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/24/tech-policy-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-2386015</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Church</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19273#comment-2386015</guid>
		<description>And, anyone talking about &quot;Free Market Internet&quot;, it may sound intelligent until you realize that government subsidies, tax benefits, and awarded monopolies have already been given out. You can&#039;t go back now. 

The public owns the airwaves, these companies just rent them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, anyone talking about &#8220;Free Market Internet&#8221;, it may sound intelligent until you realize that government subsidies, tax benefits, and awarded monopolies have already been given out. You can&#8217;t go back now. </p>
<p>The public owns the airwaves, these companies just rent them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin Philips</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/24/tech-policy-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-2386011</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Philips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19273#comment-2386011</guid>
		<description>Require anyone moving or managing bits to screen content for permissions.  Require an enforceable option for people who chose NOT to use a creative commons license.  Enough handwringing about the problem with copyright law while encouraging innovations that make it irrelevant.  There needs to be a rebalancing of the freedom to innovate, so that content creation is not completely stifled as a business in the forward rush of technology innovation as a business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Require anyone moving or managing bits to screen content for permissions.  Require an enforceable option for people who chose NOT to use a creative commons license.  Enough handwringing about the problem with copyright law while encouraging innovations that make it irrelevant.  There needs to be a rebalancing of the freedom to innovate, so that content creation is not completely stifled as a business in the forward rush of technology innovation as a business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Church</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/24/tech-policy-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-2386009</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Church</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19273#comment-2386009</guid>
		<description>Asha and Jedi Wright

What the fuck are you talking about?

The Federal Communications Commission is going to do what about energy?

Um...yeah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Asha and Jedi Wright</p>
<p>What the fuck are you talking about?</p>
<p>The Federal Communications Commission is going to do what about energy?</p>
<p>Um&#8230;yeah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erick Schonfeld</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/24/tech-policy-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-2385990</link>
		<dc:creator>Erick Schonfeld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19273#comment-2385990</guid>
		<description>Keep the suggestions coming. I&#039;m about to go on stage.

Only reason I asked for one is because the polling software we use only allows one vote per person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep the suggestions coming. I&#8217;m about to go on stage.</p>
<p>Only reason I asked for one is because the polling software we use only allows one vote per person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Cleland</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/24/tech-policy-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-2385983</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Cleland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19273#comment-2385983</guid>
		<description>A preposterous vote! one only has a choice of government intervention policies -- do you honestly think none of techcrunch&#039;s readers want an option of leave the Free Market Internet alone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A preposterous vote! one only has a choice of government intervention policies &#8212; do you honestly think none of techcrunch&#8217;s readers want an option of leave the Free Market Internet alone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
