<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Gets Into Interactive TV Ads; Buys Navic Networks For An Estimated $200 to $300 Million</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/18/microsoft-gets-into-interactive-tv-ads-buys-navic-networks-for-an-estimated-200-to-300-million/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/18/microsoft-gets-into-interactive-tv-ads-buys-navic-networks-for-an-estimated-200-to-300-million/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 01:30:57 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 建站 * 必咨 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 各大互联网公司收购的广告公司一览</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/18/microsoft-gets-into-interactive-tv-ads-buys-navic-networks-for-an-estimated-200-to-300-million/comment-page-1/#comment-2513371</link>
		<dc:creator>建站 * 必咨 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 各大互联网公司收购的广告公司一览</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 02:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19056#comment-2513371</guid>
		<description>[...] 2008年6月，收购 Navic，a company based in Waltham, Massachusetts that delivers interactive ads across cable TV networks. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2008年6月，收购 Navic，a company based in Waltham, Massachusetts that delivers interactive ads across cable TV networks. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; update market news XXI&#187; Blog Archive &#187; nugg.ad blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/18/microsoft-gets-into-interactive-tv-ads-buys-navic-networks-for-an-estimated-200-to-300-million/comment-page-1/#comment-2433507</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; update market news XXI&#187; Blog Archive &#187; nugg.ad blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19056#comment-2433507</guid>
		<description>[...] Gets Into Interactive TV Ads; Buys Navic Networks For An Estimated $200 to $300 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gets Into Interactive TV Ads; Buys Navic Networks For An Estimated $200 to $300 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft acquista Navic Networks per un costo di $200 o $300 milioni! - Geekissimo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/18/microsoft-gets-into-interactive-tv-ads-buys-navic-networks-for-an-estimated-200-to-300-million/comment-page-1/#comment-2379778</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft acquista Navic Networks per un costo di $200 o $300 milioni! - Geekissimo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19056#comment-2379778</guid>
		<description>[...] Via &#124; TechCrunch [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Via | TechCrunch [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; MicrosoftがインタラクティブTV広告分野に参入、Navic Networksを推定$200M～$300Mで買収</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/18/microsoft-gets-into-interactive-tv-ads-buys-navic-networks-for-an-estimated-200-to-300-million/comment-page-1/#comment-2378804</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; MicrosoftがインタラクティブTV広告分野に参入、Navic Networksを推定$200M～$300Mで買収</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 19:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19056#comment-2378804</guid>
		<description>[...] [原文へ] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [原文へ] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: godzilla</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/18/microsoft-gets-into-interactive-tv-ads-buys-navic-networks-for-an-estimated-200-to-300-million/comment-page-1/#comment-2378768</link>
		<dc:creator>godzilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 18:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19056#comment-2378768</guid>
		<description>I meant to say #7 Jon not #8</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant to say #7 Jon not #8</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: godzilla</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/18/microsoft-gets-into-interactive-tv-ads-buys-navic-networks-for-an-estimated-200-to-300-million/comment-page-1/#comment-2378766</link>
		<dc:creator>godzilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 18:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19056#comment-2378766</guid>
		<description>#8,
most of the big companies do that like Google bought keyhole (earth), picasa, orkut etc.,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#8,<br />
most of the big companies do that like Google bought keyhole (earth), picasa, orkut etc.,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Church</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/18/microsoft-gets-into-interactive-tv-ads-buys-navic-networks-for-an-estimated-200-to-300-million/comment-page-1/#comment-2378678</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Church</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19056#comment-2378678</guid>
		<description>Probably a good buy for MS, but why on earth have they decided they have to be an advertising giant? Just because google is? It&#039;s almost like they&#039;re on auto-pilot. They have bought some impressive ad technology to date, and now this, so I guess they are in it for the long haul.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably a good buy for MS, but why on earth have they decided they have to be an advertising giant? Just because google is? It&#8217;s almost like they&#8217;re on auto-pilot. They have bought some impressive ad technology to date, and now this, so I guess they are in it for the long haul.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Kligman</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/18/microsoft-gets-into-interactive-tv-ads-buys-navic-networks-for-an-estimated-200-to-300-million/comment-page-1/#comment-2378609</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Kligman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19056#comment-2378609</guid>
		<description>&quot;As I’ve argued before, what we need is the interactivity and targeting ability of Web video ads on TV.&quot;

This is exactly what Qoof.com is working on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As I’ve argued before, what we need is the interactivity and targeting ability of Web video ads on TV.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is exactly what Qoof.com is working on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/18/microsoft-gets-into-interactive-tv-ads-buys-navic-networks-for-an-estimated-200-to-300-million/comment-page-1/#comment-2378535</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19056#comment-2378535</guid>
		<description>Great post Erick!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Erick!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/18/microsoft-gets-into-interactive-tv-ads-buys-navic-networks-for-an-estimated-200-to-300-million/comment-page-1/#comment-2378527</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19056#comment-2378527</guid>
		<description>Does anybody know the statistics behind how much money is pumped into TV advertising vs. online advertising annually? Does anybody know the bio behind the Navic founders? Looks like it will stimulate Microsoft&#039;s advertising model http://www.readtheanswer.com/index.php?rta=blog</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anybody know the statistics behind how much money is pumped into TV advertising vs. online advertising annually? Does anybody know the bio behind the Navic founders? Looks like it will stimulate Microsoft&#8217;s advertising model <a href="http://www.readtheanswer.com/index.php?rta=blog" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.readtheanswer.com/index.php?rta=blog'>http://www.read...ex.php?rta=blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cooter McGee</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/18/microsoft-gets-into-interactive-tv-ads-buys-navic-networks-for-an-estimated-200-to-300-million/comment-page-1/#comment-2378523</link>
		<dc:creator>Cooter McGee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19056#comment-2378523</guid>
		<description>linear programming is dead.  Bring on the Internet ready TV and all of the Hulu&#039;s in waiting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>linear programming is dead.  Bring on the Internet ready TV and all of the Hulu&#8217;s in waiting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erick Schonfeld</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/18/microsoft-gets-into-interactive-tv-ads-buys-navic-networks-for-an-estimated-200-to-300-million/comment-page-1/#comment-2378516</link>
		<dc:creator>Erick Schonfeld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19056#comment-2378516</guid>
		<description>Navic already has deals with the cable companies and many cable boxes can already handle these kinds of ads.  

Yes, TiVo neutralizes them.  But DVRs supplied by the cable companies themsleves may not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Navic already has deals with the cable companies and many cable boxes can already handle these kinds of ads.  </p>
<p>Yes, TiVo neutralizes them.  But DVRs supplied by the cable companies themsleves may not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/18/microsoft-gets-into-interactive-tv-ads-buys-navic-networks-for-an-estimated-200-to-300-million/comment-page-1/#comment-2378505</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19056#comment-2378505</guid>
		<description>&quot;This is just funny… Microsoft is, yet again, trying to buy the innovation that it refuses to develop internally… 300M buys A LOT of engineers etc.&quot;

If you can reduce product development down to engineers and software, then you have a lot to learn. Most of the cost involved in producing a successful product or brand is NOT the cost of programming or development.
You also have to invest in people to be able to produce a good product or brand. That is why the oDesk style outsourcing rarely to never works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;This is just funny… Microsoft is, yet again, trying to buy the innovation that it refuses to develop internally… 300M buys A LOT of engineers etc.&#8221;</p>
<p>If you can reduce product development down to engineers and software, then you have a lot to learn. Most of the cost involved in producing a successful product or brand is NOT the cost of programming or development.<br />
You also have to invest in people to be able to produce a good product or brand. That is why the oDesk style outsourcing rarely to never works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/18/microsoft-gets-into-interactive-tv-ads-buys-navic-networks-for-an-estimated-200-to-300-million/comment-page-1/#comment-2378458</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19056#comment-2378458</guid>
		<description>This is just funny... Microsoft is, yet again, trying to buy the innovation that it refuses to develop internally... 300M buys A LOT of engineers etc.

Jon
http://woodmarvels.com - Create Unique Memories</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just funny&#8230; Microsoft is, yet again, trying to buy the innovation that it refuses to develop internally&#8230; 300M buys A LOT of engineers etc.</p>
<p>Jon<br />
<a href="http://woodmarvels.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://woodmarvels.com'>http://woodmarvels.com</a> &#8211; Create Unique Memories</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/18/microsoft-gets-into-interactive-tv-ads-buys-navic-networks-for-an-estimated-200-to-300-million/comment-page-1/#comment-2378444</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19056#comment-2378444</guid>
		<description>http://www.navic.tv/technology/apollo.php

I don&#039;t see how these features could be implemented on a normal cable box? I know digital cable boxes have the ability to do this, but it&#039;s locked by Time Warner. You can buy your own box, like a TiVo set, but is everybody going to do that just to be spammed to in the middle of a show?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.navic.tv/technology/apollo.php" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.navic.tv/technology/apollo.php'>http://www.navi...logy/apollo.php</a></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see how these features could be implemented on a normal cable box? I know digital cable boxes have the ability to do this, but it&#8217;s locked by Time Warner. You can buy your own box, like a TiVo set, but is everybody going to do that just to be spammed to in the middle of a show?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OneManOneCity</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/18/microsoft-gets-into-interactive-tv-ads-buys-navic-networks-for-an-estimated-200-to-300-million/comment-page-1/#comment-2378439</link>
		<dc:creator>OneManOneCity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19056#comment-2378439</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s almost as if Microsoft waits for Google to start getting into a market, then they immediately have to be involved.

You can&#039;t get ahead by always being one step behind . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s almost as if Microsoft waits for Google to start getting into a market, then they immediately have to be involved.</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t get ahead by always being one step behind . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/18/microsoft-gets-into-interactive-tv-ads-buys-navic-networks-for-an-estimated-200-to-300-million/comment-page-1/#comment-2378438</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19056#comment-2378438</guid>
		<description>Clickable overlay ads on TV?

I&#039;ve never seen this on timewarner. BTW, the interactivity would be overridden by TiVo on playback.

&quot;As I’ve argued before, what we need is the interactivity&quot;

I would see this as being extremely invasive technology. I would count on TiVo to neutralize these ads as adblocker plus neutralizes the TechCrunch ads.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1865

You&#039;re talking about replacing a LOT of cable boxes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clickable overlay ads on TV?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never seen this on timewarner. BTW, the interactivity would be overridden by TiVo on playback.</p>
<p>&#8220;As I’ve argued before, what we need is the interactivity&#8221;</p>
<p>I would see this as being extremely invasive technology. I would count on TiVo to neutralize these ads as adblocker plus neutralizes the TechCrunch ads.<br />
<a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1865" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1865'>https://addons....efox/addon/1865</a></p>
<p>You&#8217;re talking about replacing a LOT of cable boxes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: You SEO partner</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/18/microsoft-gets-into-interactive-tv-ads-buys-navic-networks-for-an-estimated-200-to-300-million/comment-page-1/#comment-2378437</link>
		<dc:creator>You SEO partner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19056#comment-2378437</guid>
		<description>I was wondering how long it would take connect the internet to television.  This is a great company to bring it mainstream.  Good investment Microsoft.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was wondering how long it would take connect the internet to television.  This is a great company to bring it mainstream.  Good investment Microsoft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yakov</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/18/microsoft-gets-into-interactive-tv-ads-buys-navic-networks-for-an-estimated-200-to-300-million/comment-page-1/#comment-2378426</link>
		<dc:creator>Yakov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19056#comment-2378426</guid>
		<description>sounds quite expensive!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sounds quite expensive!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruno F.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/18/microsoft-gets-into-interactive-tv-ads-buys-navic-networks-for-an-estimated-200-to-300-million/comment-page-1/#comment-2378417</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruno F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=19056#comment-2378417</guid>
		<description>It is funny to think 10-15 years ago Microsoft started messing with Video delivered over IP, and now in 2008 they are getting into cable. Seems like taking two steps forward, and one step backwards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is funny to think 10-15 years ago Microsoft started messing with Video delivered over IP, and now in 2008 they are getting into cable. Seems like taking two steps forward, and one step backwards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
