<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Here&#8217;s Our New Policy On A.P. stories: They&#8217;re Banned</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/16/heres-our-new-policy-on-ap-stories-theyre-banned/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/16/heres-our-new-policy-on-ap-stories-theyre-banned/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:44:52 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Devon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/16/heres-our-new-policy-on-ap-stories-theyre-banned/comment-page-6/#comment-3074216</link>
		<dc:creator>Devon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 21:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=18926#comment-3074216</guid>
		<description>They need to get with the times. I can&#039;t think of anyone who would call linking by titles to be plagiarism, and if I knew someone like that, I would think they were being stupid and unrealistic.

Besides - where is our right to decide what AP can and can&#039;t publish? See, they constantly fight for their freedom of speech, then hypocritically try to take it from others. Screw that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They need to get with the times. I can&#8217;t think of anyone who would call linking by titles to be plagiarism, and if I knew someone like that, I would think they were being stupid and unrealistic.</p>
<p>Besides &#8211; where is our right to decide what AP can and can&#8217;t publish? See, they constantly fight for their freedom of speech, then hypocritically try to take it from others. Screw that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Media Channel 2.0 &#8212; Blog &#8212; Once Again, AP Tries To Redefine Fair Use; Goes After Shepard Fairey Obama Poster</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/16/heres-our-new-policy-on-ap-stories-theyre-banned/comment-page-6/#comment-3058281</link>
		<dc:creator>Media Channel 2.0 &#8212; Blog &#8212; Once Again, AP Tries To Redefine Fair Use; Goes After Shepard Fairey Obama Poster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=18926#comment-3058281</guid>
		<description>[...] link to the AP story describing the dispute, except that weâ€™ve banned the AP for exactly this kind of behavior in the past. The AP has a history of making copyright [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] link to the AP story describing the dispute, except that weâ€™ve banned the AP for exactly this kind of behavior in the past. The AP has a history of making copyright [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: You Can Ignore The AP&#8217;s Bluster. It Is Just A Negotiating Bluff.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/16/heres-our-new-policy-on-ap-stories-theyre-banned/comment-page-6/#comment-3027930</link>
		<dc:creator>You Can Ignore The AP&#8217;s Bluster. It Is Just A Negotiating Bluff.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 16:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=18926#comment-3027930</guid>
		<description>[...] am temporarily lifting our ban on AP stories to make a point. The remarks seemed to be directed at Google, among others. But if you follow the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] am temporarily lifting our ban on AP stories to make a point. The remarks seemed to be directed at Google, among others. But if you follow the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Naked SEO Guide from Netpaths &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Suggestion For Better Rankings: Have Your Content Scraped</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/16/heres-our-new-policy-on-ap-stories-theyre-banned/comment-page-6/#comment-3013977</link>
		<dc:creator>The Naked SEO Guide from Netpaths &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Suggestion For Better Rankings: Have Your Content Scraped</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 21:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=18926#comment-3013977</guid>
		<description>[...] is trying to appease newspapers (and the AP specifically) and educate them about the web. Any large news event will have thousands of articles written about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is trying to appease newspapers (and the AP specifically) and educate them about the web. Any large news event will have thousands of articles written about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reuters vs. Associated Press vs. Rupert Murdoch &#124; Denken Über</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/16/heres-our-new-policy-on-ap-stories-theyre-banned/comment-page-6/#comment-2917323</link>
		<dc:creator>Reuters vs. Associated Press vs. Rupert Murdoch &#124; Denken Über</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 15:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=18926#comment-2917323</guid>
		<description>[...] me preguntan ¿Va a tener éxito Associated Press si prohibe el linkeo o Rupert Murdoch haciendo que haya que pagar por todo el contenido de todos sus diarios? No lo [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] me preguntan ¿Va a tener éxito Associated Press si prohibe el linkeo o Rupert Murdoch haciendo que haya que pagar por todo el contenido de todos sus diarios? No lo [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ugg</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/16/heres-our-new-policy-on-ap-stories-theyre-banned/comment-page-6/#comment-2899429</link>
		<dc:creator>ugg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 06:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=18926#comment-2899429</guid>
		<description>thanks for sharing. good to know that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for sharing. good to know that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley Aneiros</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/16/heres-our-new-policy-on-ap-stories-theyre-banned/comment-page-6/#comment-2846068</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley Aneiros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 15:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=18926#comment-2846068</guid>
		<description>this applies perfectly -- http://stantonconversations.blogspot.com/2009/06/at-very-least-its-ironic.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this applies perfectly &#8212; <a href="http://stantonconversations.blogspot.com/2009/06/at-very-least-its-ironic.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://stantonconversations.blogspot.com/2009/06/at-very-least-its-ironic.html'>http://stantonc...its-ironic.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog Censorship is Coming, Blog Censorship is Coming &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/16/heres-our-new-policy-on-ap-stories-theyre-banned/comment-page-6/#comment-2837143</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog Censorship is Coming, Blog Censorship is Coming &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 06:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=18926#comment-2837143</guid>
		<description>[...] linking and quoting stories falls in line with the fair use exemption clause of copyright law, as TechCrunch reports, they want to sue you [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] linking and quoting stories falls in line with the fair use exemption clause of copyright law, as TechCrunch reports, they want to sue you [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kushal Hada</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/16/heres-our-new-policy-on-ap-stories-theyre-banned/comment-page-6/#comment-2836844</link>
		<dc:creator>Kushal Hada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 19:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=18926#comment-2836844</guid>
		<description>Has anything changed since?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anything changed since?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: illiterato</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/16/heres-our-new-policy-on-ap-stories-theyre-banned/comment-page-6/#comment-2826418</link>
		<dc:creator>illiterato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 12:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=18926#comment-2826418</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s unreasonable about defining the boundaries of fair use? You write:

&#039;They will “attempt to define clear standards as to how much of its articles and broadcasts bloggers and Web sites can excerpt without infringing on The A.P.’s copyright.”&#039;

Isn&#039;t the problem that there is little case law to determine these standards in the online sphere? The law needs to be tested, and AP is doing it the right way by asserting copyright over its own intellectual property.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s unreasonable about defining the boundaries of fair use? You write:</p>
<p>&#8216;They will “attempt to define clear standards as to how much of its articles and broadcasts bloggers and Web sites can excerpt without infringing on The A.P.’s copyright.”&#8217;</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t the problem that there is little case law to determine these standards in the online sphere? The law needs to be tested, and AP is doing it the right way by asserting copyright over its own intellectual property.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How To Save The Newspapers, Vol. XII: Outlaw Linking &#124; Newsfed - Aggregate local and tech stories with related videos and tweets!</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/16/heres-our-new-policy-on-ap-stories-theyre-banned/comment-page-6/#comment-2826338</link>
		<dc:creator>How To Save The Newspapers, Vol. XII: Outlaw Linking &#124; Newsfed - Aggregate local and tech stories with related videos and tweets!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 08:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=18926#comment-2826338</guid>
		<description>[...] Posner does not work for the Associated Press (which also has some strange ideas on linking). He is (normally) considered to be one of the great legal minds of our time. Posner is a United [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Posner does not work for the Associated Press (which also has some strange ideas on linking). He is (normally) considered to be one of the great legal minds of our time. Posner is a United [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShaunKenney.com &#187; TechCrunch Bans the Associated Press</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/16/heres-our-new-policy-on-ap-stories-theyre-banned/comment-page-6/#comment-2812060</link>
		<dc:creator>ShaunKenney.com &#187; TechCrunch Bans the Associated Press</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 03:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=18926#comment-2812060</guid>
		<description>[...] always wondered whether or not the good old-fashioned interdict would hurt or help: The stories over the weekend were bad enough - the Associated Press, with a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] always wondered whether or not the good old-fashioned interdict would hurt or help: The stories over the weekend were bad enough &#8211; the Associated Press, with a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian Grantham</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/16/heres-our-new-policy-on-ap-stories-theyre-banned/comment-page-6/#comment-2690074</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Grantham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 18:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=18926#comment-2690074</guid>
		<description>AP just sent a cease and desist to the TN station saying the station violated copyright by posting AP&#039;s YouTube video on their website! Here is WTNQ&#039;s Frank Strovel telling me about it via Skype this morning: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E9YLkcJsoGk

AP&#039;s Vice President of Affiliate Relations in Chicago and some AP attorney sent the C&amp;D, but when told about the AP YouTube channel, they had no idea it existed! They are in the process of &quot;investigating&quot; it... YES, investigating their own YouTube channel that enables embed codes for a reason!

There are two corporate cultures at AP: one that has embraced the new distribution and revenue model and one that is over paid and running AP into the ground.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AP just sent a cease and desist to the TN station saying the station violated copyright by posting AP&#8217;s YouTube video on their website! Here is WTNQ&#8217;s Frank Strovel telling me about it via Skype this morning: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E9YLkcJsoGk" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E9YLkcJsoGk'>http://www.yout...h?v=E9YLkcJsoGk</a></p>
<p>AP&#8217;s Vice President of Affiliate Relations in Chicago and some AP attorney sent the C&amp;D, but when told about the AP YouTube channel, they had no idea it existed! They are in the process of &#8220;investigating&#8221; it&#8230; YES, investigating their own YouTube channel that enables embed codes for a reason!</p>
<p>There are two corporate cultures at AP: one that has embraced the new distribution and revenue model and one that is over paid and running AP into the ground.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/16/heres-our-new-policy-on-ap-stories-theyre-banned/comment-page-6/#comment-2688040</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 16:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=18926#comment-2688040</guid>
		<description>They should be boycotted.  What an  outrage they are behaving like this when they GET their content from other news sources.

 &quot;As part of their cooperative agreement with The Associated Press, most member news organizations grant automatic permission for the AP to distribute their local news reports&quot;. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Associated_Press</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should be boycotted.  What an  outrage they are behaving like this when they GET their content from other news sources.</p>
<p> &#8220;As part of their cooperative agreement with The Associated Press, most member news organizations grant automatic permission for the AP to distribute their local news reports&#8221;. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Associated_Press" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Associated_Press'>http://en.wikip...ssociated_Press</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dutch Gays Pervert the Bible; AP Couldn&#8217;t Care Less &#171; Jess and Josh Talk About Stuff</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/16/heres-our-new-policy-on-ap-stories-theyre-banned/comment-page-6/#comment-2677087</link>
		<dc:creator>Dutch Gays Pervert the Bible; AP Couldn&#8217;t Care Less &#171; Jess and Josh Talk About Stuff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 01:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=18926#comment-2677087</guid>
		<description>[...] AP Couldn&#8217;t Care&#160;Less By joshshots  Maybe it&#8217;s just because bloggers are still boycotting the Associated Press (right?), but nobody appears to notice that the beleaguered news organization recently picked up on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] AP Couldn&#8217;t Care&nbsp;Less By joshshots  Maybe it&#8217;s just because bloggers are still boycotting the Associated Press (right?), but nobody appears to notice that the beleaguered news organization recently picked up on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alarm</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/16/heres-our-new-policy-on-ap-stories-theyre-banned/comment-page-6/#comment-2636590</link>
		<dc:creator>Alarm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=18926#comment-2636590</guid>
		<description>thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alarm</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/16/heres-our-new-policy-on-ap-stories-theyre-banned/comment-page-6/#comment-2636587</link>
		<dc:creator>Alarm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=18926#comment-2636587</guid>
		<description>thanks man. good job</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks man. good job</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ctn</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/16/heres-our-new-policy-on-ap-stories-theyre-banned/comment-page-6/#comment-2636000</link>
		<dc:creator>ctn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 23:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=18926#comment-2636000</guid>
		<description>i think this good</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think this good</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Overly restrictive A.P. quoting guidelines risk winning battles at the war’s expense &#124; SEO Backlinking - SEO and Online Reputation Management Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/16/heres-our-new-policy-on-ap-stories-theyre-banned/comment-page-6/#comment-2635207</link>
		<dc:creator>Overly restrictive A.P. quoting guidelines risk winning battles at the war’s expense &#124; SEO Backlinking - SEO and Online Reputation Management Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=18926#comment-2635207</guid>
		<description>[...] Mike Arrington, Here’s Our New Policy On A.P. stories: They’re Banned, and all stories and posts linked from there; Techmeme re [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mike Arrington, Here’s Our New Policy On A.P. stories: They’re Banned, and all stories and posts linked from there; Techmeme re [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: [The Far Edge] &#187; Hot News: The AP Is Living In The Last Century</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/16/heres-our-new-policy-on-ap-stories-theyre-banned/comment-page-6/#comment-2633793</link>
		<dc:creator>[The Far Edge] &#187; Hot News: The AP Is Living In The Last Century</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 06:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=18926#comment-2633793</guid>
		<description>[...] AP’s beef against AHN appears to have more merit than when it tried to go after bloggers for merely linking to its stories without changing the headlines. AHN itself sells news feeds and headlines to other [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] AP’s beef against AHN appears to have more merit than when it tried to go after bloggers for merely linking to its stories without changing the headlines. AHN itself sells news feeds and headlines to other [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gadget world &#187; Hot News: The AP Is Living In The Last Century</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/16/heres-our-new-policy-on-ap-stories-theyre-banned/comment-page-6/#comment-2633733</link>
		<dc:creator>Gadget world &#187; Hot News: The AP Is Living In The Last Century</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 04:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=18926#comment-2633733</guid>
		<description>[...] AP’s beef against AHN appears to have more merit than when it tried to go after bloggers for merely linking to its stories without changing the headlines. AHN itself sells news feeds and headlines to other [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] AP’s beef against AHN appears to have more merit than when it tried to go after bloggers for merely linking to its stories without changing the headlines. AHN itself sells news feeds and headlines to other [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot News: The AP Is Living In The Last Century &#124; Blog YODspica Ltd</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/16/heres-our-new-policy-on-ap-stories-theyre-banned/comment-page-6/#comment-2633645</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot News: The AP Is Living In The Last Century &#124; Blog YODspica Ltd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 02:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=18926#comment-2633645</guid>
		<description>[...] AP&#8217;s beef against AHN appears to have more merit than when it tried to go after bloggers for merely linking to its stories without changing the headlines. AHN itself sells news feeds and headlines to other [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] AP&#8217;s beef against AHN appears to have more merit than when it tried to go after bloggers for merely linking to its stories without changing the headlines. AHN itself sells news feeds and headlines to other [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot News: The AP Is Living In The Last Century</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/16/heres-our-new-policy-on-ap-stories-theyre-banned/comment-page-6/#comment-2633451</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot News: The AP Is Living In The Last Century</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 21:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=18926#comment-2633451</guid>
		<description>[...] AP&#8217;s beef against AHN appears to have more merit than when it tried to go after bloggers for merely linking to its stories without changing the headlines. AHN itself sells news feeds and headlines to other [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] AP&#8217;s beef against AHN appears to have more merit than when it tried to go after bloggers for merely linking to its stories without changing the headlines. AHN itself sells news feeds and headlines to other [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ozan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/16/heres-our-new-policy-on-ap-stories-theyre-banned/comment-page-6/#comment-2627990</link>
		<dc:creator>Ozan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=18926#comment-2627990</guid>
		<description>I do not understand what this is ap?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not understand what this is ap?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thecolor &#187; Once Again, The AP Tries To Redefine Fair Use; Goes After Shepard Fairey For Obama Poster</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/16/heres-our-new-policy-on-ap-stories-theyre-banned/comment-page-6/#comment-2617416</link>
		<dc:creator>thecolor &#187; Once Again, The AP Tries To Redefine Fair Use; Goes After Shepard Fairey For Obama Poster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 22:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=18926#comment-2617416</guid>
		<description>[...] link to the AP story describing the dispute, except that we’ve banned the AP for exactly this kind of behavior in the past. The AP has a history of making copyright [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] link to the AP story describing the dispute, except that we’ve banned the AP for exactly this kind of behavior in the past. The AP has a history of making copyright [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
