Comments on: Apple Relaunches .Mac as MobileMe: Sync Everything

By: How The Different Mobile Data Syncing Services Stack Up « Kentmihlbauer’s Blog

Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:23:56 +0000

[...] every Web phone out there comes with at least some sort of rudimentary syncing app. Apple has MobileMe, Nokia has Ovi, Palm has Synergy, Blackberry has Internet Services, and Microsoft has My Phone. An [...]

By: Sincronización de datos con el móvil | TeCHmi

Sincronización de datos con el móvil | TeCHmi — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:31:20 +0000

[...] players (provedores) de telefonía móvil ofrece su solución, eso sí cerrada. Apple tiene MobileMe, Nokia tiene Ovi, Palm tiene Synergy, Blackberry tiene Internet Services y Microsoft tiene My [...]

By: The Far Edge » Blog Archive » How The Different Mobile Data Syncing Services Stack Up

Wed, 10 Jun 2009 01:36:35 +0000

By: How Mobile Sync Services Compare | Blog YODspica Ltd

How Mobile Sync Services Compare | Blog YODspica Ltd — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 14:43:05 +0000

By: Comparing Mobile Data Syncing Services…06.09.09 « The Proverbial Lone Wolf Librarian’s Weblog

Tue, 09 Jun 2009 14:39:09 +0000

By: How The Different Mobile Data Syncing Services Stack Up | Inside Cell Phones

Tue, 09 Jun 2009 10:02:48 +0000

By: How The Different Mobile Data Syncing Services Stack Up - Mobile News

How The Different Mobile Data Syncing Services Stack Up - Mobile News — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 05:08:46 +0000

By: How The Different Mobile Data Syncing Services Stack Up

How The Different Mobile Data Syncing Services Stack Up — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 04:40:26 +0000

By: Apple Considers Streaming Media from iTunes to iPhone | Trinitude Network

Apple Considers Streaming Media from iTunes to iPhone | Trinitude Network — Sat, 09 Aug 2008 02:22:06 +0000

[...] to make consumers’ personal files available to them on whichever device they use. Of course, MobileMe already goes to show that Apple has data synchronization on its mind – but perhaps there’s a [...]

By: With MobileMe, Apple Bites Off More Than It Can Chew

With MobileMe, Apple Bites Off More Than It Can Chew — Tue, 05 Aug 2008 17:34:52 +0000

[...] notion that Apple would become a major player in cloud computing, even if MobileMe was technically only an upgrade to the six-year-old .Mac [...]

By: momokoyc

momokoyc — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 06:30:38 +0000

It seems cool but expensive.

By: What’s in store? « Londonstrategy’s Weblog

What’s in store? « Londonstrategy’s Weblog — Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:02:04 +0000

[...] in Palm OS, Symbian and Windows Mobile devices some buzzed about the all-syncing, all knowing, MobileMe replacing .Mac being the high point (with a tip of the hat to SproutCore). This may not be enough [...]

By: MD

MD — Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:06:20 +0000

All the features of webmail exists right now in .Mac so what is new?

By: TechCrunch en français » Funambol, un concurrent OpenSource de MobileMe…pour l’iPhone

Wed, 11 Jun 2008 07:16:42 +0000

[...] des grandes annonces faite par Apple, hier, fut le remplacement de .Mac par MobileMe, un nouveau service qui synchronise vos emails, contacts, calendriers, photos et fichiers entre [...]

By: TechCrunch en français » YouSendit, pour envoyer de gros fichiers sur Outlook

Wed, 11 Jun 2008 05:45:31 +0000

[...] SendThisFile et Rapidshare; sans parler des solutions de stockage et de syncronisation comme MobileMe, Dropbox ou [...]

By: Funambol To Offer An Open-Source Competitor To MobileMe . . . As An iPhone App

Funambol To Offer An Open-Source Competitor To MobileMe . . . As An iPhone App — Wed, 11 Jun 2008 04:11:34 +0000

[...] of the big announcements yesterday from Apple was that it is replacing its .Mac service with MobileMe, a new service that will sync your email, contacts, calendar, photos, and files between your iPhone, [...]

By: WebbAlert - June 10, 2008 | TechTV Update

WebbAlert - June 10, 2008 | TechTV Update — Wed, 11 Jun 2008 02:21:43 +0000

[...] with 2.0 software – and bye bye .mac – it’s now mobile me. They’re even working with Microsoft Active Exchange. Plus there are some cool applications in the iPhone App [...]

By: rainbow

rainbow — Wed, 11 Jun 2008 01:36:32 +0000

#20 I suposse they will be launching a widget soon to integrate social networking to the device.

By: Bowen

Bowen — Tue, 10 Jun 2008 20:30:03 +0000

I think I’d prefer to have RT sync with Google calendar & contacts, but if I can move things over to Apple’s web UI seamlessly, it might well be worth $99/year. That said, someone will almost certainly come out with real iPhone sync for the Google apps as well, right? I don’t really care about desktop sync (Outlook, feh!) since I just use the online UI there too.

By: Dan

Dan — Tue, 10 Jun 2008 19:49:28 +0000

smcnally – LiveMesh is supposed to be platform independent. They definitely called out OS X at least — I don’t know about the iPhone, though…

By: Shared Information?

Shared Information? — Tue, 10 Jun 2008 13:00:06 +0000

synching is good, but theres another functionality that is important from a business context, sharing contacts, tasks, calendars and documents etc. What about that?

By: Syaman

Syaman — Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:51:18 +0000

MobileMe seems to be a good complement to SugarSync.
SugarSync = syncs files (including photos)
MobileMe = syncs Photos Mail, Contacts, Calendar (but no ToDo List still!???)

By: YouSendIt Does The Heavy Lifting For Outlook

YouSendIt Does The Heavy Lifting For Outlook — Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:00:24 +0000

[...] and Rapidshare – not to mention online storage and syncing solutions like newly-(re)introduced MobileMe, Dropbox and SugarSync. CrunchBase Information YouSendIt Pando Information provided by [...]

By: Want to Try Out Apple’s MobileMe? Check Out SproutCore : New Web 2.0 Magazine

Want to Try Out Apple’s MobileMe? Check Out SproutCore : New Web 2.0 Magazine — Tue, 10 Jun 2008 09:33:29 +0000

[...] of MobileMe, so it isn’t surprising that the photo app bears a strong resemblance to the demo shown at today’s WWDC [...]

By: 99?

99? — Tue, 10 Jun 2008 09:32:45 +0000

$99/year when I can get most online storage service for free. Why should I pay an expensive price for this?