<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Damnit&#8230;FriendFeed Gets Even More Useful With An Interestingness Filter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/06/damnitfriendfeed-gets-even-more-useful/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/06/damnitfriendfeed-gets-even-more-useful/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:28:33 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wesley Schadenfreud</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/06/damnitfriendfeed-gets-even-more-useful/comment-page-1/#comment-2493288</link>
		<dc:creator>Wesley Schadenfreud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 21:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/06/damnitfriendfeed-gets-even-more-useful/#comment-2493288</guid>
		<description>i prefer &quot;willingness to pay&quot; to any measure - 

well, perhaps i could segregate based on the service -

for instance, for twitter, there are varying input methods &amp; access points with varying UIs ... but there are ways to measure the time &amp;/or value expensed - here is what it might look like :::

1) value &amp;/or expense of 140 characters - ASCII through ISO definitions providing context; 2) value of a tweet - post on friendfeed with or without a link (more bandwidth after all including any hashtags or similar efforts to preserve space at the expense of computation); 3) value to re-tweet exactly (such that a 3rd party would not know the difference, or similar context); 4) value to retweet inexactly (3rd party could determine at least one difference); 5) not enough value &amp;/or expense to tweet again 

but the reference to &quot;interestingness&quot; is more likely a not-so-veiled-reference to a term being used as if it had meaning to one having ordinary skill in the art  - specifically - it is a word that folks from Yahoo have been pressing as part of a patent filing (specifically butterfield et al. appln 11/350,981)

not knowing why this is not included in the article, i presume the push for the term is quite ironic in light of the push for patent reform by those who profess innovation ... &amp; those who profess to be &quot;inside&quot; the innovation

&quot;willingness to pay&quot; - that is the filter i want on all of my feeds ;-) 

anyone know where that filter is ... i think i have a hunch</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i prefer &#8220;willingness to pay&#8221; to any measure &#8211; </p>
<p>well, perhaps i could segregate based on the service -</p>
<p>for instance, for twitter, there are varying input methods &amp; access points with varying UIs &#8230; but there are ways to measure the time &amp;/or value expensed &#8211; here is what it might look like :::</p>
<p>1) value &amp;/or expense of 140 characters &#8211; ASCII through ISO definitions providing context; 2) value of a tweet &#8211; post on friendfeed with or without a link (more bandwidth after all including any hashtags or similar efforts to preserve space at the expense of computation); 3) value to re-tweet exactly (such that a 3rd party would not know the difference, or similar context); 4) value to retweet inexactly (3rd party could determine at least one difference); 5) not enough value &amp;/or expense to tweet again </p>
<p>but the reference to &#8220;interestingness&#8221; is more likely a not-so-veiled-reference to a term being used as if it had meaning to one having ordinary skill in the art  &#8211; specifically &#8211; it is a word that folks from Yahoo have been pressing as part of a patent filing (specifically butterfield et al. appln 11/350,981)</p>
<p>not knowing why this is not included in the article, i presume the push for the term is quite ironic in light of the push for patent reform by those who profess innovation &#8230; &amp; those who profess to be &#8220;inside&#8221; the innovation</p>
<p>&#8220;willingness to pay&#8221; &#8211; that is the filter i want on all of my feeds <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>anyone know where that filter is &#8230; i think i have a hunch</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friendfeed &#124; Bakkel dot com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/06/damnitfriendfeed-gets-even-more-useful/comment-page-1/#comment-2390987</link>
		<dc:creator>Friendfeed &#124; Bakkel dot com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 20:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/06/damnitfriendfeed-gets-even-more-useful/#comment-2390987</guid>
		<description>[...] is Friendfeed nog steeds niet geheel doorgedrongen in ons land. Waar het in de VS erg populair is onder de webloggers en er hele discussies worden gevoerd op een enkel twitterbericht, lijkt het bij ons niet echt [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is Friendfeed nog steeds niet geheel doorgedrongen in ons land. Waar het in de VS erg populair is onder de webloggers en er hele discussies worden gevoerd op een enkel twitterbericht, lijkt het bij ons niet echt [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: washwords</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/06/damnitfriendfeed-gets-even-more-useful/comment-page-1/#comment-2359872</link>
		<dc:creator>washwords</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 23:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/06/damnitfriendfeed-gets-even-more-useful/#comment-2359872</guid>
		<description>Wow, feel a little better that I&#039;m not completely late to the party. If you&#039;re not friendfeeding, I&#039;m not completely out of the loop I guess. 

In the last few weeks I&#039;ve added: del.ic.io.us, twitter, plurk, friendfeeder, soup.io, drop.io, facebook, digg, reddit, stumbleit, a few (google, flock, bloglines) readers, meebo, me.dium, hmm I&#039;m sure there are more ... I literally can&#039;t keep track. oh right, twhirl, flock,  technorati, flickr, picasa, adium, youtube....etc. ad infinitium

I&#039;m completely overwhelmed and find I&#039;m having less time to blog, let alone clean my house or go to my actual job. I find this all completely fascinating and can literally spend days (weeks) mulling each service, playing on it and ... well, you get the idea. 

I&#039;m sure I am less tech-savvy than most of your readers, but I&#039;m savvy enough to be dangerous (and geekish, social media addicted to my loved ones). 

What&#039;s my point? I don&#039;t know, besides having a headache. And oh yeah, to ask... where do I start? where do I end? I literally find something new and wonderful EVERY day and I&#039;m starting to run out hours for... life. help!?

washy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, feel a little better that I&#8217;m not completely late to the party. If you&#8217;re not friendfeeding, I&#8217;m not completely out of the loop I guess. </p>
<p>In the last few weeks I&#8217;ve added: del.ic.io.us, twitter, plurk, friendfeeder, soup.io, drop.io, facebook, digg, reddit, stumbleit, a few (google, flock, bloglines) readers, meebo, me.dium, hmm I&#8217;m sure there are more &#8230; I literally can&#8217;t keep track. oh right, twhirl, flock,  technorati, flickr, picasa, adium, youtube&#8230;.etc. ad infinitium</p>
<p>I&#8217;m completely overwhelmed and find I&#8217;m having less time to blog, let alone clean my house or go to my actual job. I find this all completely fascinating and can literally spend days (weeks) mulling each service, playing on it and &#8230; well, you get the idea. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure I am less tech-savvy than most of your readers, but I&#8217;m savvy enough to be dangerous (and geekish, social media addicted to my loved ones). </p>
<p>What&#8217;s my point? I don&#8217;t know, besides having a headache. And oh yeah, to ask&#8230; where do I start? where do I end? I literally find something new and wonderful EVERY day and I&#8217;m starting to run out hours for&#8230; life. help!?</p>
<p>washy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: web</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/06/damnitfriendfeed-gets-even-more-useful/comment-page-1/#comment-2358728</link>
		<dc:creator>web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 13:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/06/damnitfriendfeed-gets-even-more-useful/#comment-2358728</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the great post ;D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the great post ;D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/06/damnitfriendfeed-gets-even-more-useful/comment-page-1/#comment-2357259</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 20:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/06/damnitfriendfeed-gets-even-more-useful/#comment-2357259</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure they&#039;ll be happy to expose their data, as long as they can still make money.  By the way, how exactly *do* they make money?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;ll be happy to expose their data, as long as they can still make money.  By the way, how exactly *do* they make money?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlton Northern</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/06/damnitfriendfeed-gets-even-more-useful/comment-page-1/#comment-2357199</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlton Northern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 20:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/06/damnitfriendfeed-gets-even-more-useful/#comment-2357199</guid>
		<description>Good luck trying to get FF to format their data in an exportable way.  I&#039;ve been trying to do the same thing with Spock.com, but have had no luck so far.  See the link below.

http://carlton-northern.blogspot.com/2008/06/i-sent-below-email-to-spock-today.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good luck trying to get FF to format their data in an exportable way.  I&#8217;ve been trying to do the same thing with Spock.com, but have had no luck so far.  See the link below.</p>
<p><a href="http://carlton-northern.blogspot.com/2008/06/i-sent-below-email-to-spock-today.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://carlton-northern.blogspot.com/2008/06/i-sent-below-email-to-spock-today.html'>http://carlton-...pock-today.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: directeur</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/06/damnitfriendfeed-gets-even-more-useful/comment-page-1/#comment-2357193</link>
		<dc:creator>directeur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 20:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/06/damnitfriendfeed-gets-even-more-useful/#comment-2357193</guid>
		<description>(from FriendFeed because you don&#039;t use it)

&quot;Interestingness Filter&quot;... Even if you put a total crap online Arrington their algorithm will still think that it&#039;s interesting. I know you won&#039;t even read what I&#039;m writing (too &quot;shy&quot; to share with individuals of your kind?) but the fact is it doesn&#039;t filter on &quot;Interestingness&quot;, it does on &quot;popularity&quot; and this VERY different. Hear me? Very different :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(from FriendFeed because you don&#8217;t use it)</p>
<p>&#8220;Interestingness Filter&#8221;&#8230; Even if you put a total crap online Arrington their algorithm will still think that it&#8217;s interesting. I know you won&#8217;t even read what I&#8217;m writing (too &#8220;shy&#8221; to share with individuals of your kind?) but the fact is it doesn&#8217;t filter on &#8220;Interestingness&#8221;, it does on &#8220;popularity&#8221; and this VERY different. Hear me? Very different <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KP</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/06/damnitfriendfeed-gets-even-more-useful/comment-page-1/#comment-2356305</link>
		<dc:creator>KP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 14:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/06/damnitfriendfeed-gets-even-more-useful/#comment-2356305</guid>
		<description>@Michael - &quot;A natural next step is for them to release the feature without the first filter&quot; -
that filter across the service is available on our feed reader at Genwi - and both most viewed and highest rated filters across your subscriptions have been up on our service for 2 weeks - we don&#039;t have Scoble et al. using our site. Hopefully with some basic web design/messaging fixes that crowd will find utility to the site - b/c it&#039;s a workhorse for breaking news. Anyways- just want a chance to get mentioned in the same conversation -b/c we&#039;re right there with the leaders on these developments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Michael &#8211; &#8220;A natural next step is for them to release the feature without the first filter&#8221; -<br />
that filter across the service is available on our feed reader at Genwi &#8211; and both most viewed and highest rated filters across your subscriptions have been up on our service for 2 weeks &#8211; we don&#8217;t have Scoble et al. using our site. Hopefully with some basic web design/messaging fixes that crowd will find utility to the site &#8211; b/c it&#8217;s a workhorse for breaking news. Anyways- just want a chance to get mentioned in the same conversation -b/c we&#8217;re right there with the leaders on these developments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Anzman</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/06/damnitfriendfeed-gets-even-more-useful/comment-page-1/#comment-2356299</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Anzman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 14:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/06/damnitfriendfeed-gets-even-more-useful/#comment-2356299</guid>
		<description>Michael - Think you should add &#039;Like&#039; smileys to Techcrunch.  That highly underrated Friendfeed feature makes it easy to note you read a piece and show you enjoyed it.  Go for it :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael &#8211; Think you should add &#8216;Like&#8217; smileys to Techcrunch.  That highly underrated Friendfeed feature makes it easy to note you read a piece and show you enjoyed it.  Go for it <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walledgardennudist</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/06/damnitfriendfeed-gets-even-more-useful/comment-page-1/#comment-2356205</link>
		<dc:creator>walledgardennudist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 13:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/06/damnitfriendfeed-gets-even-more-useful/#comment-2356205</guid>
		<description>Funny.  So, one walled garden blocks another? http://groups.google.com/group/friendfeed/browse_thread/thread/0dae5c63c0fdfcc9</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny.  So, one walled garden blocks another? <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/friendfeed/browse_thread/thread/0dae5c63c0fdfcc9" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://groups.google.com/group/friendfeed/browse_thread/thread/0dae5c63c0fdfcc9'>http://groups.g...dae5c63c0fdfcc9</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/06/damnitfriendfeed-gets-even-more-useful/comment-page-1/#comment-2356203</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 13:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/06/damnitfriendfeed-gets-even-more-useful/#comment-2356203</guid>
		<description>At the previous two... Every single one of my friends is on Facebook/Myspace.  None of them would ever find a service like FriendFeed useful.

It&#039;s cool for the tech crowd, but that&#039;s about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the previous two&#8230; Every single one of my friends is on Facebook/Myspace.  None of them would ever find a service like FriendFeed useful.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s cool for the tech crowd, but that&#8217;s about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Hawk</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/06/damnitfriendfeed-gets-even-more-useful/comment-page-1/#comment-2356190</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Hawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 13:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/06/damnitfriendfeed-gets-even-more-useful/#comment-2356190</guid>
		<description>This is a great feature, but what&#039;s more powerful are the implications this feature has for social search in the future.  Flickr was one of the first companies to offer an interestingness feature.  In fact, they actually filed a patent on the concept, which I always thought was totally lame, but that&#039;s an aside.  I always expected Yahoo to do more with this than they ever did.

Today&#039;s feature is but the first step.  To show you what your social circle found interesting on FriendFeed in the last day, week, or month.  A simple page for discovery.

Begin to apply this concept to search more broadly though and it becomes far more powerful.  As more and more of the web gets filtered through the FriendFeed experience, strong interesting stories getting voted up, weak uninteresting stories getting voted down, by your peers.

So eventually you want to see stories on dogs or cats or TechCrunch or photography or whatever and one of the search views that you get back are search results filtered by the likes of your social circle.  Perhaps a far more relevant filter for your own personal taste.  The more of the web that gets indexed through FriendFeed, the more complete and powerful this concept becomes.

If FriendFeed can capitalize on the concept of social search, that Yahoo has largely fumbled, it could be something quite a bit bigger than the &quot;little aggregator that could&quot; that some people might see it as today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great feature, but what&#8217;s more powerful are the implications this feature has for social search in the future.  Flickr was one of the first companies to offer an interestingness feature.  In fact, they actually filed a patent on the concept, which I always thought was totally lame, but that&#8217;s an aside.  I always expected Yahoo to do more with this than they ever did.</p>
<p>Today&#8217;s feature is but the first step.  To show you what your social circle found interesting on FriendFeed in the last day, week, or month.  A simple page for discovery.</p>
<p>Begin to apply this concept to search more broadly though and it becomes far more powerful.  As more and more of the web gets filtered through the FriendFeed experience, strong interesting stories getting voted up, weak uninteresting stories getting voted down, by your peers.</p>
<p>So eventually you want to see stories on dogs or cats or TechCrunch or photography or whatever and one of the search views that you get back are search results filtered by the likes of your social circle.  Perhaps a far more relevant filter for your own personal taste.  The more of the web that gets indexed through FriendFeed, the more complete and powerful this concept becomes.</p>
<p>If FriendFeed can capitalize on the concept of social search, that Yahoo has largely fumbled, it could be something quite a bit bigger than the &#8220;little aggregator that could&#8221; that some people might see it as today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marc dahan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/06/damnitfriendfeed-gets-even-more-useful/comment-page-1/#comment-2356177</link>
		<dc:creator>marc dahan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 13:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/06/damnitfriendfeed-gets-even-more-useful/#comment-2356177</guid>
		<description>facebook is so long to upload with all the apps, friendsfeed is so quick and useful...
Look like that between myspace/facebook/google battle, herecome the Outsider Friendsfeed, so exiting, it will relaunch web 2.0 sites</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>facebook is so long to upload with all the apps, friendsfeed is so quick and useful&#8230;<br />
Look like that between myspace/facebook/google battle, herecome the Outsider Friendsfeed, so exiting, it will relaunch web 2.0 sites</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Hammer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/06/damnitfriendfeed-gets-even-more-useful/comment-page-1/#comment-2356044</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Hammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 12:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/06/damnitfriendfeed-gets-even-more-useful/#comment-2356044</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been saying for some time now that Mark Zuckerberg, as brilliant as I believe he is for Facebook (and at 23), that Bret Taylor is, to my mind, just as talented if not even moreso.

Also, to extend Esther Dyson&#039;s phrasing that I heard (I belive Michael also said something similar), if Google is the next Microsoft, and Facebook is the next Google, then I would add that Friendfeed strongly appears to be the next Facebook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been saying for some time now that Mark Zuckerberg, as brilliant as I believe he is for Facebook (and at 23), that Bret Taylor is, to my mind, just as talented if not even moreso.</p>
<p>Also, to extend Esther Dyson&#8217;s phrasing that I heard (I belive Michael also said something similar), if Google is the next Microsoft, and Facebook is the next Google, then I would add that Friendfeed strongly appears to be the next Facebook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Cox</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/06/damnitfriendfeed-gets-even-more-useful/comment-page-1/#comment-2355947</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Cox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 12:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/06/damnitfriendfeed-gets-even-more-useful/#comment-2355947</guid>
		<description>@ Michael - I think your right that FriendFeed seems to be on the right track to solving the centralized me quandary.  Innovation without considerable roll-outs to follow (IE it seems like FriendFeed has 2 or 3 new things a week while we are still waiting for Twitter&#039;s search) is setting yourself up to be the Friendster of your space.

@ Michael/Everyone - I would lose heads up to Sameer Mishra in a spell-off hands down, [if you haven&#039;t seen this yet then you must be under a rock: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VjzrNWPul9E] would it kill someone to create a nice add-on app to do a quick spell check for sites that allow comment submitions?  LOL, am I the only one that is deathly afraid of the occasional monumental typo that gives your post about as much credibility as a 3 year old banging his head against the keyboard?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Michael &#8211; I think your right that FriendFeed seems to be on the right track to solving the centralized me quandary.  Innovation without considerable roll-outs to follow (IE it seems like FriendFeed has 2 or 3 new things a week while we are still waiting for Twitter&#8217;s search) is setting yourself up to be the Friendster of your space.</p>
<p>@ Michael/Everyone &#8211; I would lose heads up to Sameer Mishra in a spell-off hands down, [if you haven&#8217;t seen this yet then you must be under a rock: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VjzrNWPul9E" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VjzrNWPul9E'>http://www.yout...h?v=VjzrNWPul9E</a> would it kill someone to create a nice add-on app to do a quick spell check for sites that allow comment submitions?  LOL, am I the only one that is deathly afraid of the occasional monumental typo that gives your post about as much credibility as a 3 year old banging his head against the keyboard?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Neimke</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/06/damnitfriendfeed-gets-even-more-useful/comment-page-1/#comment-2355829</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Neimke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 11:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/06/damnitfriendfeed-gets-even-more-useful/#comment-2355829</guid>
		<description>Wow, that&#039;s so cool.  $5M and they managed to get 3 new hyperlinks on the page.  Sweet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, that&#8217;s so cool.  $5M and they managed to get 3 new hyperlinks on the page.  Sweet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Blog Posts</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/06/damnitfriendfeed-gets-even-more-useful/comment-page-1/#comment-2355659</link>
		<dc:creator>My Blog Posts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 10:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/06/damnitfriendfeed-gets-even-more-useful/#comment-2355659</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Friendfeed is your Personal Techmeme - Suggests Personalised &#8220;Best Reads&#8221;...&lt;/strong&gt;

Friendfeed becomes your own personalised Techmeme (according to me)
How ?
[Underneath the search box on your FriendFeed homepage, you now have links to see the &#8220;best of&#8221; FriendFeed from the past day, week, or month according to the people y...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Friendfeed is your Personal Techmeme &#8211; Suggests Personalised &#8220;Best Reads&#8221;&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Friendfeed becomes your own personalised Techmeme (according to me)<br />
How ?<br />
[Underneath the search box on your FriendFeed homepage, you now have links to see the &#8220;best of&#8221; FriendFeed from the past day, week, or month according to the people y&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan Horna</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/06/damnitfriendfeed-gets-even-more-useful/comment-page-1/#comment-2355632</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Horna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 09:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/06/damnitfriendfeed-gets-even-more-useful/#comment-2355632</guid>
		<description>It looks like FriendFeed is going to clean up the social networking mess with a little help from the prioritizing algorithm. 

Let&#039;s wait and see it it works. So far the majority of the algorithms have failed. Think of crappy Facebook app invites, Twitter followers with 92573 friends and so on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like FriendFeed is going to clean up the social networking mess with a little help from the prioritizing algorithm. </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s wait and see it it works. So far the majority of the algorithms have failed. Think of crappy Facebook app invites, Twitter followers with 92573 friends and so on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evangelist</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/06/damnitfriendfeed-gets-even-more-useful/comment-page-1/#comment-2355513</link>
		<dc:creator>Evangelist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 08:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/06/damnitfriendfeed-gets-even-more-useful/#comment-2355513</guid>
		<description>Hmmm... Why is twitter status site powered by Tumblr?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230; Why is twitter status site powered by Tumblr?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colby Olson</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/06/damnitfriendfeed-gets-even-more-useful/comment-page-1/#comment-2355506</link>
		<dc:creator>Colby Olson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 08:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/06/damnitfriendfeed-gets-even-more-useful/#comment-2355506</guid>
		<description>I would love to see a &quot;network wide best of:&quot; option next to the currently new &quot;best of:&quot; from those I am subscribed to. I would hate to see FriendFeed become the next Digg where it&#039;s only a battle of who can get the most digg&#039;s via their friends.

Their new feature now has me jumping into the damn fishing boat instead of merely being hooked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to see a &#8220;network wide best of:&#8221; option next to the currently new &#8220;best of:&#8221; from those I am subscribed to. I would hate to see FriendFeed become the next Digg where it&#8217;s only a battle of who can get the most digg&#8217;s via their friends.</p>
<p>Their new feature now has me jumping into the damn fishing boat instead of merely being hooked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodney Rumford</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/06/damnitfriendfeed-gets-even-more-useful/comment-page-1/#comment-2355398</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodney Rumford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 07:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/06/damnitfriendfeed-gets-even-more-useful/#comment-2355398</guid>
		<description>yup. friendfeed is on a roll with this new feature in addition to the &quot;Rooms&quot; that they added last week. 

These guys are on to something as friendfeed continues to get more interesting and useful; while twitter is just struggling to keep afloat. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yup. friendfeed is on a roll with this new feature in addition to the &#8220;Rooms&#8221; that they added last week. </p>
<p>These guys are on to something as friendfeed continues to get more interesting and useful; while twitter is just struggling to keep afloat. <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/06/damnitfriendfeed-gets-even-more-useful/comment-page-1/#comment-2355372</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 07:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/06/damnitfriendfeed-gets-even-more-useful/#comment-2355372</guid>
		<description>@scoble

it&#039;s been 6 hours, for sure it&#039;s out of the state now...

@michael

Oh great another feature to make me even more addicted to this micro-blogging phenom. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@scoble</p>
<p>it&#8217;s been 6 hours, for sure it&#8217;s out of the state now&#8230;</p>
<p>@michael</p>
<p>Oh great another feature to make me even more addicted to this micro-blogging phenom. <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hey Twitter, Maybe It&#8217;s Better Not To Share Absolutely Everything</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/06/damnitfriendfeed-gets-even-more-useful/comment-page-1/#comment-2355367</link>
		<dc:creator>Hey Twitter, Maybe It&#8217;s Better Not To Share Absolutely Everything</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 07:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/06/damnitfriendfeed-gets-even-more-useful/#comment-2355367</guid>
		<description>[...] &#171; Previous post [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &laquo; Previous post [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Scoble</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/06/damnitfriendfeed-gets-even-more-useful/comment-page-1/#comment-2355317</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Scoble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 07:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/06/damnitfriendfeed-gets-even-more-useful/#comment-2355317</guid>
		<description>Love the new features. By the way, if someone sees Twitter&#039;s database, can you please return it? Seems that they&#039;ve lost it: http://status.twitter.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the new features. By the way, if someone sees Twitter&#8217;s database, can you please return it? Seems that they&#8217;ve lost it: <a href="http://status.twitter.com/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://status.twitter.com/'>http://status.twitter.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
