<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WhitePages.com To Buy Snapvine for Around $20 Million</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/04/whitepagescom-to-buy-snapvine-for-around-20-million/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/04/whitepagescom-to-buy-snapvine-for-around-20-million/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:51:04 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 2008 Year End Acquisitions Post &#187; The StartUp Blog at PartnerUp</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/04/whitepagescom-to-buy-snapvine-for-around-20-million/comment-page-1/#comment-2586462</link>
		<dc:creator>2008 Year End Acquisitions Post &#187; The StartUp Blog at PartnerUp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/04/whitepagescom-to-buy-snapvine-for-around-20-million/#comment-2586462</guid>
		<description>[...] is a VOIP/Widget startup. Press Release &#124; TechCrunch &#124; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is a VOIP/Widget startup. Press Release | TechCrunch | [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dRaddissoclab</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/04/whitepagescom-to-buy-snapvine-for-around-20-million/comment-page-1/#comment-2508851</link>
		<dc:creator>dRaddissoclab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/04/whitepagescom-to-buy-snapvine-for-around-20-million/#comment-2508851</guid>
		<description>Good day! &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citeulike.org/profile/apekoff&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;michigan breast augmentation&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good day! <a href="http://www.citeulike.org/profile/apekoff" rel="nofollow">michigan breast augmentation</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Complete List of Q2 2008 Web / Internet / Tech Acquisitions &#187; The StartUp Blog at PartnerUp</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/04/whitepagescom-to-buy-snapvine-for-around-20-million/comment-page-1/#comment-2410439</link>
		<dc:creator>Complete List of Q2 2008 Web / Internet / Tech Acquisitions &#187; The StartUp Blog at PartnerUp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 20:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/04/whitepagescom-to-buy-snapvine-for-around-20-million/#comment-2410439</guid>
		<description>[...] is a VOIP/Widget startup. Press Release &#124; TechCrunch &#124; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is a VOIP/Widget startup. Press Release | TechCrunch | [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Praized Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Communication is at the Heart of Social</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/04/whitepagescom-to-buy-snapvine-for-around-20-million/comment-page-1/#comment-2366844</link>
		<dc:creator>The Praized Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Communication is at the Heart of Social</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/04/whitepagescom-to-buy-snapvine-for-around-20-million/#comment-2366844</guid>
		<description>[...] to Techcrunch, &#8220;they’ll integrate Snapvine into search results, letting people claim their information [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to Techcrunch, &#8220;they’ll integrate Snapvine into search results, letting people claim their information [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/04/whitepagescom-to-buy-snapvine-for-around-20-million/comment-page-1/#comment-2359100</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 15:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/04/whitepagescom-to-buy-snapvine-for-around-20-million/#comment-2359100</guid>
		<description>Good question Shanthala - I am familiar with what they are doing at whitepages.com and they have taken the &quot;freak-out&quot; concern seriously.  this is precisely why they bought snapvine - whitepages.com becomes the message broker while protecting the privacy of the message recipient.  I think this has the potential to be very powerful.

Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question Shanthala &#8211; I am familiar with what they are doing at whitepages.com and they have taken the &#8220;freak-out&#8221; concern seriously.  this is precisely why they bought snapvine &#8211; whitepages.com becomes the message broker while protecting the privacy of the message recipient.  I think this has the potential to be very powerful.</p>
<p>Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shanthala Balagopal</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/04/whitepagescom-to-buy-snapvine-for-around-20-million/comment-page-1/#comment-2357586</link>
		<dc:creator>Shanthala Balagopal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 23:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/04/whitepagescom-to-buy-snapvine-for-around-20-million/#comment-2357586</guid>
		<description>Hey Mike,

How do you think people will react to adding their online places to their Whitepages listings?

Would they freak out?

Shanthala</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Mike,</p>
<p>How do you think people will react to adding their online places to their Whitepages listings?</p>
<p>Would they freak out?</p>
<p>Shanthala</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WhitePages.com purchases Snapvine, will provide free voicemail &#124; money news blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/04/whitepagescom-to-buy-snapvine-for-around-20-million/comment-page-1/#comment-2350723</link>
		<dc:creator>WhitePages.com purchases Snapvine, will provide free voicemail &#124; money news blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 23:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/04/whitepagescom-to-buy-snapvine-for-around-20-million/#comment-2350723</guid>
		<description>[...] [via TechCrunch] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [via TechCrunch] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/04/whitepagescom-to-buy-snapvine-for-around-20-million/comment-page-1/#comment-2350502</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 21:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/04/whitepagescom-to-buy-snapvine-for-around-20-million/#comment-2350502</guid>
		<description>Glad the issue is fixed, I still find the site to look like someone puked ads all over it, but just my opinion. 

As for whitepages.com&#039;s other advertisers, I looked on comscore and hitwise and it says (correctly or not I don&#039;t know) that almost 2/3rd of their downstream traffic goes to USSearch. If this is true, you&#039;re either not admitting your numbers (hey you&#039;re private you don&#039;t have to) or you&#039;re ripping off your other advertisers.

Regardless - I think the overall directory whitepages space is dead. More people are shifting to only cell phone, whitepages.com does not have these numbers in any reliable way thus the need for their site is going to dry up. I think there are some interesting sites out there playing in this space like Wink, Spock, etc. Whitepages.com - not one of them. 

There&#039;s a reason why the Snapvine guys took cash and no stock! They probably agree with me! If you believe in a company and the direction it is going, wouldn&#039;t you take stock?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad the issue is fixed, I still find the site to look like someone puked ads all over it, but just my opinion. </p>
<p>As for whitepages.com&#8217;s other advertisers, I looked on comscore and hitwise and it says (correctly or not I don&#8217;t know) that almost 2/3rd of their downstream traffic goes to USSearch. If this is true, you&#8217;re either not admitting your numbers (hey you&#8217;re private you don&#8217;t have to) or you&#8217;re ripping off your other advertisers.</p>
<p>Regardless &#8211; I think the overall directory whitepages space is dead. More people are shifting to only cell phone, whitepages.com does not have these numbers in any reliable way thus the need for their site is going to dry up. I think there are some interesting sites out there playing in this space like Wink, Spock, etc. Whitepages.com &#8211; not one of them. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s a reason why the Snapvine guys took cash and no stock! They probably agree with me! If you believe in a company and the direction it is going, wouldn&#8217;t you take stock?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Meixner</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/04/whitepagescom-to-buy-snapvine-for-around-20-million/comment-page-1/#comment-2350428</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Meixner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 21:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/04/whitepagescom-to-buy-snapvine-for-around-20-million/#comment-2350428</guid>
		<description>Yep, 
Whitepages.com had a malware issue last summer with two European advertisers. We are very grateful to the spyware sucks web site for helping us find the offenders. We have instituted processes that have helped us (knock on wood) keep spyware ads off of our sites since then. 

As for the USSearch issue: Our advertising revenue is diversified across hundreds of clients each month and no one client is a &quot;... super big chunk&quot; of our revenue.

Eric Meixner
Sr. Manager of Ad Operations
Whitepages.com, Inc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep,<br />
Whitepages.com had a malware issue last summer with two European advertisers. We are very grateful to the spyware sucks web site for helping us find the offenders. We have instituted processes that have helped us (knock on wood) keep spyware ads off of our sites since then. </p>
<p>As for the USSearch issue: Our advertising revenue is diversified across hundreds of clients each month and no one client is a &#8220;&#8230; super big chunk&#8221; of our revenue.</p>
<p>Eric Meixner<br />
Sr. Manager of Ad Operations<br />
Whitepages.com, Inc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NoWay Jose</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/04/whitepagescom-to-buy-snapvine-for-around-20-million/comment-page-1/#comment-2350405</link>
		<dc:creator>NoWay Jose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 20:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/04/whitepagescom-to-buy-snapvine-for-around-20-million/#comment-2350405</guid>
		<description>The &quot;bad and often documented rep&quot; URL points to a single case and has the following comment:

Thank you very much for your help in finding our nasty malware highjacker.  We have pulled this ad immediately. Whitepages.com does not knowingly run these types of advertisers.  We apologize for any inconvenience this issue has caused everyone.

Eric Meixner
Manager of Ad Operations
Whitepages.com, Inc.

So that seems like a red herring (at best) and I don&#039;t see anything else online about these guys and malware.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;bad and often documented rep&#8221; URL points to a single case and has the following comment:</p>
<p>Thank you very much for your help in finding our nasty malware highjacker.  We have pulled this ad immediately. Whitepages.com does not knowingly run these types of advertisers.  We apologize for any inconvenience this issue has caused everyone.</p>
<p>Eric Meixner<br />
Manager of Ad Operations<br />
Whitepages.com, Inc.</p>
<p>So that seems like a red herring (at best) and I don&#8217;t see anything else online about these guys and malware.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/04/whitepagescom-to-buy-snapvine-for-around-20-million/comment-page-1/#comment-2350346</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 20:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/04/whitepagescom-to-buy-snapvine-for-around-20-million/#comment-2350346</guid>
		<description>First, congrats to the guys at Snapvine, but I agree with Peter Urban (post 5) great job on taking cash. 

Whitepages.com has a bad and often documented rep for being pretty slimey with spyware. See: http://msmvps.com/blogs/spywaresucks/archive/2007/08/22/1129296.aspx 
I have a hard time believing in this company or their model. Everytime you go to their site you get spammed with ads.

Also, most of their traffic seems to go to USSearch, which would mean to me that must be a super big chunck of their revenue. I point this out becase techcrunch highlighted Intelius&#039; business model and USSearch&#039;s is the exact same. So if Intelius is forced to change their model so will USSearch which will flow down to Whitepages.com. 

Lastly, if you look at the metrics that InfoSpace sold their directory services company to Idearc for, Whitepages does not make for an exciting IPO.

Congrats on the sales, bigger contrats on the cash!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, congrats to the guys at Snapvine, but I agree with Peter Urban (post 5) great job on taking cash. </p>
<p>Whitepages.com has a bad and often documented rep for being pretty slimey with spyware. See: <a href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/spywaresucks/archive/2007/08/22/1129296.aspx" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://msmvps.com/blogs/spywaresucks/archive/2007/08/22/1129296.aspx'>http://msmvps.c...22/1129296.aspx</a><br />
I have a hard time believing in this company or their model. Everytime you go to their site you get spammed with ads.</p>
<p>Also, most of their traffic seems to go to USSearch, which would mean to me that must be a super big chunck of their revenue. I point this out becase techcrunch highlighted Intelius&#8217; business model and USSearch&#8217;s is the exact same. So if Intelius is forced to change their model so will USSearch which will flow down to Whitepages.com. </p>
<p>Lastly, if you look at the metrics that InfoSpace sold their directory services company to Idearc for, Whitepages does not make for an exciting IPO.</p>
<p>Congrats on the sales, bigger contrats on the cash!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schutzler</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/04/whitepagescom-to-buy-snapvine-for-around-20-million/comment-page-1/#comment-2350199</link>
		<dc:creator>Schutzler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 19:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/04/whitepagescom-to-buy-snapvine-for-around-20-million/#comment-2350199</guid>
		<description>I know both founders and both companies quite well.  Imho, this is a smart merger.  The Snapvine team will fit well with the team at Whitepages.com   The Snapvine technical competence in VoIP, SMS, Mobile, etc is of particularly great value to Whitepages.  And it’s an excellent opportunity for Alex and Joe to combine their assets &amp; talents into creating more consumer value than either company could alone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know both founders and both companies quite well.  Imho, this is a smart merger.  The Snapvine team will fit well with the team at Whitepages.com   The Snapvine technical competence in VoIP, SMS, Mobile, etc is of particularly great value to Whitepages.  And it’s an excellent opportunity for Alex and Joe to combine their assets &amp; talents into creating more consumer value than either company could alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crazy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/04/whitepagescom-to-buy-snapvine-for-around-20-million/comment-page-1/#comment-2350042</link>
		<dc:creator>Crazy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 18:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/04/whitepagescom-to-buy-snapvine-for-around-20-million/#comment-2350042</guid>
		<description>Wow. That company was a sinking ship. It looks like they got very lucky to get bought for less than half of what they &quot;thought&quot; they were worth. I bet they had some board and investor pressure to take what money they could and run fast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. That company was a sinking ship. It looks like they got very lucky to get bought for less than half of what they &#8220;thought&#8221; they were worth. I bet they had some board and investor pressure to take what money they could and run fast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Geller</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/04/whitepagescom-to-buy-snapvine-for-around-20-million/comment-page-1/#comment-2349848</link>
		<dc:creator>David Geller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 17:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/04/whitepagescom-to-buy-snapvine-for-around-20-million/#comment-2349848</guid>
		<description>Congratulations to Joe and his team and Snapvine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations to Joe and his team and Snapvine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luca</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/04/whitepagescom-to-buy-snapvine-for-around-20-million/comment-page-1/#comment-2349557</link>
		<dc:creator>Luca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 14:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/04/whitepagescom-to-buy-snapvine-for-around-20-million/#comment-2349557</guid>
		<description>Mmm... Our service Sitofono (www.sitofono.com) delivers high quality click to call and voicemail to directories (among those the italian Yellow and White pages, the 4th biggest worldwide) at an annual cost that is a very, very, very tiny percentage of what they paid. I hope they have a clear idea on how to quickly get their ROI.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mmm&#8230; Our service Sitofono (www.sitofono.com) delivers high quality click to call and voicemail to directories (among those the italian Yellow and White pages, the 4th biggest worldwide) at an annual cost that is a very, very, very tiny percentage of what they paid. I hope they have a clear idea on how to quickly get their ROI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neville</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/04/whitepagescom-to-buy-snapvine-for-around-20-million/comment-page-1/#comment-2349547</link>
		<dc:creator>Neville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 14:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/04/whitepagescom-to-buy-snapvine-for-around-20-million/#comment-2349547</guid>
		<description>At a $50 million valuation, the investors did not almost double their money. 12/50  is just under 25% (in other words, investing 12 million dollars into a company valued at 50 million will only get you 25% of the company). 25% of $20M is $5M. This doesn&#039;t take into account preferred vs. common stock, but still.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At a $50 million valuation, the investors did not almost double their money. 12/50  is just under 25% (in other words, investing 12 million dollars into a company valued at 50 million will only get you 25% of the company). 25% of $20M is $5M. This doesn&#8217;t take into account preferred vs. common stock, but still.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rex Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/04/whitepagescom-to-buy-snapvine-for-around-20-million/comment-page-1/#comment-2349501</link>
		<dc:creator>Rex Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 14:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/04/whitepagescom-to-buy-snapvine-for-around-20-million/#comment-2349501</guid>
		<description>if the company wasn&#039;t going anywhere, $20 million is a lot of money and the investors almost doubled their money. seems like a successful outcome to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if the company wasn&#8217;t going anywhere, $20 million is a lot of money and the investors almost doubled their money. seems like a successful outcome to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/04/whitepagescom-to-buy-snapvine-for-around-20-million/comment-page-1/#comment-2349441</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 13:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/04/whitepagescom-to-buy-snapvine-for-around-20-million/#comment-2349441</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m interested to know how they were valued at $50mil?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m interested to know how they were valued at $50mil?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Urban</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/04/whitepagescom-to-buy-snapvine-for-around-20-million/comment-page-1/#comment-2349425</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Urban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 13:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/04/whitepagescom-to-buy-snapvine-for-around-20-million/#comment-2349425</guid>
		<description>Congratulations. The snapvine guys are smart to go with cash deal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations. The snapvine guys are smart to go with cash deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/04/whitepagescom-to-buy-snapvine-for-around-20-million/comment-page-1/#comment-2349364</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 13:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/04/whitepagescom-to-buy-snapvine-for-around-20-million/#comment-2349364</guid>
		<description>Does anyone know what the Whitepages.com valuation was?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know what the Whitepages.com valuation was?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rlam</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/04/whitepagescom-to-buy-snapvine-for-around-20-million/comment-page-1/#comment-2349327</link>
		<dc:creator>rlam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 13:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/04/whitepagescom-to-buy-snapvine-for-around-20-million/#comment-2349327</guid>
		<description>Anything that leads to better privacy is good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anything that leads to better privacy is good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R. Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/04/whitepagescom-to-buy-snapvine-for-around-20-million/comment-page-1/#comment-2349264</link>
		<dc:creator>R. Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 12:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/04/whitepagescom-to-buy-snapvine-for-around-20-million/#comment-2349264</guid>
		<description>I would not have predicted M&amp;A between social network widgets and white pages. If they can make this work it is probably a good deal however.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would not have predicted M&amp;A between social network widgets and white pages. If they can make this work it is probably a good deal however.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/04/whitepagescom-to-buy-snapvine-for-around-20-million/comment-page-1/#comment-2349182</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 12:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/04/whitepagescom-to-buy-snapvine-for-around-20-million/#comment-2349182</guid>
		<description>Who would have known that something so simple was worth so much!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who would have known that something so simple was worth so much!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
