<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oh No He Didn&#8217;t</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/oh-no-he-didnt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/oh-no-he-didnt/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:13:35 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shii</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/oh-no-he-didnt/comment-page-2/#comment-2341692</link>
		<dc:creator>Shii</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 22:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/oh-no-he-didnt/#comment-2341692</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;And get the Scoble guy a job, he’s bored!&lt;/i&gt;

So true...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>And get the Scoble guy a job, he’s bored!</i></p>
<p>So true&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/oh-no-he-didnt/comment-page-2/#comment-2339176</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 08:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/oh-no-he-didnt/#comment-2339176</guid>
		<description>Oh dear, the guy doesn&#039;t do PR, what would the world become if coders were socially awkward in public situations... seriously, move on, there&#039;s nothing new here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh dear, the guy doesn&#8217;t do PR, what would the world become if coders were socially awkward in public situations&#8230; seriously, move on, there&#8217;s nothing new here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 113.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/oh-no-he-didnt/comment-page-2/#comment-2338871</link>
		<dc:creator>113.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 01:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/oh-no-he-didnt/#comment-2338871</guid>
		<description>@78 - thanks for the details..

Same conclusion -- sucks.

The mentality of this guy, that is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@78 &#8211; thanks for the details..</p>
<p>Same conclusion &#8212; sucks.</p>
<p>The mentality of this guy, that is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence Salberg</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/oh-no-he-didnt/comment-page-2/#comment-2338828</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence Salberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 01:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/oh-no-he-didnt/#comment-2338828</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s be straight about one thing: Blaine Cook was the problem at Twitter. Whether or not he was the ONLY problem remains to be seen.

I saw him speak at FOWA in Miami - Jan 2008 - probably one of the last public appearances of Cook. Not having been a user (or fan of) Twitter at that point, I was stunned that *this guy* who I was watching stumble and bumble for words was the &quot;chief architect&quot; of this big web app that everyone had been raving about for months.

His geekiness was one thing, but his schoolgirl-like snickers and giggling, along with his flighty ideals, quite amazed me. I kept thinking, &quot;Is this a web app being run by DVD pirates or something?&quot;. In stark contrast to every other web appreneur that was there, it was like watching the one guy who snuck in via back stage.

If you think I&#039;m kidding, &lt;a href=&quot;http://futureofwebapps.com/2008/miami/pastevents.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;listen to the MP3 of his talk&lt;/a&gt;, especially the Q&amp;A during the last third, at  as long as they keep it up there. It&#039;s embarrassing. I was actually embarrassed for  him (knowing nothing about him previously) when he was giving that &quot;speech&quot;. I know speeches by code guys are always a bit suspect, but this was beyond stage fright. It was a deep insight into a singular and real problem at the company: Blaine Cook.

A few gems:

&quot;So, rails is slow. Just in case there was any question. But I love it. It works well.&quot; (Huh?)

&quot;When we enter the rails stack, it takes a long time to go through that stack, even just for a cached request, relatively long time, I think about 20ms. We want to get that down to 2ms.&quot;

&quot;Oh, it looks like someone is calling me. Cause the site is down. Great.&quot;

&quot;For what it&#039;s worth, the site&#039;s been doing really well for the last two or three weeks. All the downtime so far has been when we&#039;ve hit something, some key, incorrectly, and bring the site down.&quot;

&quot;I probably would use Rails again. I&#039;m not... I love Ruby. It&#039;s a fantastic language.&quot;

&quot;Building a great product is all about execution. There are plenty of sites that basically did the same as Twitter. You could use Blogger as Twitter... all these sorts of things. But none of them really took off.&quot;

&quot;When you build a web app, you&#039;re building something that people use. And you need to make sure that people can actually use it. We haven&#039;t done the best job of it.&quot;

&quot;You know, you want to fix things. This is something that is kind of, you know, a sore subject. Make sure that, when things are broken, do everything you can to fix problems.&quot;

&quot;I think a lot of sites have a big problem with shipping products. They want it to be perfect before releasing it to the public. I think that&#039;s a flawed mentality. It&#039;s never going to be perfect. And you want to make sure that when you work on something, that you get it out there. And you iterate on it, and you build, and you make sure that you&#039;re just moving forward. Because it&#039;s easy to get caught up in trying to make something perfect, and then you&#039;re never going to ship it, and then you get depressed because you&#039;re not shipping something, and then you get in Valleywag &#039;Are they ever going to ship?&#039;, and these sorts of things. And so, as much as possible, you know, avoid that. You know, working on the web is a really exciting thing. And part of working on the web is releasing things, and building new things, and making the internet a more interesting place, and making the world a more interesting place. I think that&#039;s, uh, really important.&quot;

Yeah, this was his advice to OTHER web app builders. I frankly couldn&#039;t understand why FOWA even had this guy lecturing the attendees on this stuff. It wasn&#039;t like he had ten great web apps under his belt. He had one - and a half-assed one at that.

There are dozens more quips in there. 

He might be a great code guy, and he might be a great code team guy, but he should avoid microphones. And maybe, as Arrington has noted here by pointing out this singular Twitter, just maybe Cook should avoid the public controversy of it all. He isn&#039;t a PR guy... that much is evident.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s be straight about one thing: Blaine Cook was the problem at Twitter. Whether or not he was the ONLY problem remains to be seen.</p>
<p>I saw him speak at FOWA in Miami &#8211; Jan 2008 &#8211; probably one of the last public appearances of Cook. Not having been a user (or fan of) Twitter at that point, I was stunned that *this guy* who I was watching stumble and bumble for words was the &#8220;chief architect&#8221; of this big web app that everyone had been raving about for months.</p>
<p>His geekiness was one thing, but his schoolgirl-like snickers and giggling, along with his flighty ideals, quite amazed me. I kept thinking, &#8220;Is this a web app being run by DVD pirates or something?&#8221;. In stark contrast to every other web appreneur that was there, it was like watching the one guy who snuck in via back stage.</p>
<p>If you think I&#8217;m kidding, <a href="http://futureofwebapps.com/2008/miami/pastevents.php" rel="nofollow">listen to the MP3 of his talk</a>, especially the Q&amp;A during the last third, at  as long as they keep it up there. It&#8217;s embarrassing. I was actually embarrassed for  him (knowing nothing about him previously) when he was giving that &#8220;speech&#8221;. I know speeches by code guys are always a bit suspect, but this was beyond stage fright. It was a deep insight into a singular and real problem at the company: Blaine Cook.</p>
<p>A few gems:</p>
<p>&#8220;So, rails is slow. Just in case there was any question. But I love it. It works well.&#8221; (Huh?)</p>
<p>&#8220;When we enter the rails stack, it takes a long time to go through that stack, even just for a cached request, relatively long time, I think about 20ms. We want to get that down to 2ms.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Oh, it looks like someone is calling me. Cause the site is down. Great.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;For what it&#8217;s worth, the site&#8217;s been doing really well for the last two or three weeks. All the downtime so far has been when we&#8217;ve hit something, some key, incorrectly, and bring the site down.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;I probably would use Rails again. I&#8217;m not&#8230; I love Ruby. It&#8217;s a fantastic language.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Building a great product is all about execution. There are plenty of sites that basically did the same as Twitter. You could use Blogger as Twitter&#8230; all these sorts of things. But none of them really took off.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;When you build a web app, you&#8217;re building something that people use. And you need to make sure that people can actually use it. We haven&#8217;t done the best job of it.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;You know, you want to fix things. This is something that is kind of, you know, a sore subject. Make sure that, when things are broken, do everything you can to fix problems.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;I think a lot of sites have a big problem with shipping products. They want it to be perfect before releasing it to the public. I think that&#8217;s a flawed mentality. It&#8217;s never going to be perfect. And you want to make sure that when you work on something, that you get it out there. And you iterate on it, and you build, and you make sure that you&#8217;re just moving forward. Because it&#8217;s easy to get caught up in trying to make something perfect, and then you&#8217;re never going to ship it, and then you get depressed because you&#8217;re not shipping something, and then you get in Valleywag &#8216;Are they ever going to ship?&#8217;, and these sorts of things. And so, as much as possible, you know, avoid that. You know, working on the web is a really exciting thing. And part of working on the web is releasing things, and building new things, and making the internet a more interesting place, and making the world a more interesting place. I think that&#8217;s, uh, really important.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah, this was his advice to OTHER web app builders. I frankly couldn&#8217;t understand why FOWA even had this guy lecturing the attendees on this stuff. It wasn&#8217;t like he had ten great web apps under his belt. He had one &#8211; and a half-assed one at that.</p>
<p>There are dozens more quips in there. </p>
<p>He might be a great code guy, and he might be a great code team guy, but he should avoid microphones. And maybe, as Arrington has noted here by pointing out this singular Twitter, just maybe Cook should avoid the public controversy of it all. He isn&#8217;t a PR guy&#8230; that much is evident.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nobosh.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/oh-no-he-didnt/comment-page-2/#comment-2338805</link>
		<dc:creator>nobosh.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 00:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/oh-no-he-didnt/#comment-2338805</guid>
		<description>yikes. Will actions like this help or hurt him in the industry?

BA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yikes. Will actions like this help or hurt him in the industry?</p>
<p>BA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: takeitorleaveit</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/oh-no-he-didnt/comment-page-2/#comment-2338525</link>
		<dc:creator>takeitorleaveit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 21:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/oh-no-he-didnt/#comment-2338525</guid>
		<description>Mike

2 Straght advices:
1. READ BLAINE&#039;S ARTICLE CAREFULLY BEFORE YOU JUMP THE GUN
2. STOP ASSOCIATING WITH SCOBLE, HE IS THE SCUM OF THE INTERNET SOCIETY</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike</p>
<p>2 Straght advices:<br />
1. READ BLAINE&#8217;S ARTICLE CAREFULLY BEFORE YOU JUMP THE GUN<br />
2. STOP ASSOCIATING WITH SCOBLE, HE IS THE SCUM OF THE INTERNET SOCIETY</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Piercy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/oh-no-he-didnt/comment-page-2/#comment-2338311</link>
		<dc:creator>John Piercy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 19:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/oh-no-he-didnt/#comment-2338311</guid>
		<description>Rob  we like you as the creative videomaker / CEO interviewing /photographer / type . 

Your well established and you have a new baby .

Leave the Twitter stuff alone , go for a photowalk with Thomas Hawk and chill out .

Let Twitter figure out its own deal .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob  we like you as the creative videomaker / CEO interviewing /photographer / type . </p>
<p>Your well established and you have a new baby .</p>
<p>Leave the Twitter stuff alone , go for a photowalk with Thomas Hawk and chill out .</p>
<p>Let Twitter figure out its own deal .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/oh-no-he-didnt/comment-page-2/#comment-2338302</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 19:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/oh-no-he-didnt/#comment-2338302</guid>
		<description>Michael, you need to reread his tweet. He said that twitter is dead to him UNTIL IM service is back online. Simple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael, you need to reread his tweet. He said that twitter is dead to him UNTIL IM service is back online. Simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/oh-no-he-didnt/comment-page-2/#comment-2338285</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 19:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/oh-no-he-didnt/#comment-2338285</guid>
		<description>that was Journalism ^= Opinionism ^= Knowledge</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that was Journalism ^= Opinionism ^= Knowledge</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/oh-no-he-didnt/comment-page-2/#comment-2338280</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 19:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/oh-no-he-didnt/#comment-2338280</guid>
		<description>Scoble: The ratio of interesting to boring articles is very low here, but sometimes the misleading titles lead to something actually interesting Arringtons opinions aside. Journalism  Opinionism  Knowledge.

Also, a lot of traffic seems to be along the lines of &quot;shut up already&quot;. I&#039;m just hoping for a better ratio in both so I can read Friendfeed again without seeing your curious fungus creeping about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scoble: The ratio of interesting to boring articles is very low here, but sometimes the misleading titles lead to something actually interesting Arringtons opinions aside. Journalism  Opinionism  Knowledge.</p>
<p>Also, a lot of traffic seems to be along the lines of &#8220;shut up already&#8221;. I&#8217;m just hoping for a better ratio in both so I can read Friendfeed again without seeing your curious fungus creeping about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy Daniels</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/oh-no-he-didnt/comment-page-2/#comment-2338249</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy Daniels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 18:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/oh-no-he-didnt/#comment-2338249</guid>
		<description>Paul, I agree with you 100%, it&#039;s all about me me me nowadays. Nowadays when I go to techmeme I hardly read anything because when I do I end up reading crap like this and scobles whining about twitter or something. I wish he would stay at the bank.

And whats up with the video comments? I wish they would take seesmic or whatever it is, turn it sideways and shove it straight up their ass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, I agree with you 100%, it&#8217;s all about me me me nowadays. Nowadays when I go to techmeme I hardly read anything because when I do I end up reading crap like this and scobles whining about twitter or something. I wish he would stay at the bank.</p>
<p>And whats up with the video comments? I wish they would take seesmic or whatever it is, turn it sideways and shove it straight up their ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/oh-no-he-didnt/comment-page-2/#comment-2338236</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 18:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/oh-no-he-didnt/#comment-2338236</guid>
		<description>I love the smell of dot-commer immaturity in morning!  It reminds me of bubbles popping.  Unfortunately the crazy parties tend to die down as well.  Ah...kibu.com, whereforartthou?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the smell of dot-commer immaturity in morning!  It reminds me of bubbles popping.  Unfortunately the crazy parties tend to die down as well.  Ah&#8230;kibu.com, whereforartthou?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Hammer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/oh-no-he-didnt/comment-page-2/#comment-2338192</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Hammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 18:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/oh-no-he-didnt/#comment-2338192</guid>
		<description>PS Only if you agree, but you need to pay more attention to the way that you dress (and comb your hair) in some of your videos and public appearances.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS Only if you agree, but you need to pay more attention to the way that you dress (and comb your hair) in some of your videos and public appearances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Hammer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/oh-no-he-didnt/comment-page-2/#comment-2338184</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Hammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 18:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/oh-no-he-didnt/#comment-2338184</guid>
		<description>Michael,

I agree with your ends, but not with your means. I think you know (from previously) what I am talking about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,</p>
<p>I agree with your ends, but not with your means. I think you know (from previously) what I am talking about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Scrivens</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/oh-no-he-didnt/comment-page-2/#comment-2338095</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Scrivens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 17:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/oh-no-he-didnt/#comment-2338095</guid>
		<description>I took the time to think and see if maybe I was simply hating on Scoble and after some deliberation I have come to this conclusion. I am not hating on Scoble, I am simply annoyed by Scoble. I don&#039;t read his site, don&#039;t watch his shows, yet everywhere I go I have to read a comment by Scoble and it usually includes him interviewing some person at a company, Twitter or FriendFeed.

Scoble is ruining my web experience even when I try to avoid him. At least when Arrington annoys me he keeps himself to his own site.

And there is your new Web 2.0 company folks, create a service where I can ignore people across the web and not just on a single site. You will get VC money somehow, trust me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I took the time to think and see if maybe I was simply hating on Scoble and after some deliberation I have come to this conclusion. I am not hating on Scoble, I am simply annoyed by Scoble. I don&#8217;t read his site, don&#8217;t watch his shows, yet everywhere I go I have to read a comment by Scoble and it usually includes him interviewing some person at a company, Twitter or FriendFeed.</p>
<p>Scoble is ruining my web experience even when I try to avoid him. At least when Arrington annoys me he keeps himself to his own site.</p>
<p>And there is your new Web 2.0 company folks, create a service where I can ignore people across the web and not just on a single site. You will get VC money somehow, trust me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xavierv</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/oh-no-he-didnt/comment-page-2/#comment-2338065</link>
		<dc:creator>xavierv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 16:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/oh-no-he-didnt/#comment-2338065</guid>
		<description>&quot;The unofficial off the record story...&quot;

If you wrote it, it&#039;s not unofficial, that&#039;s for sure!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The unofficial off the record story&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>If you wrote it, it&#8217;s not unofficial, that&#8217;s for sure!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: suckingeggs</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/oh-no-he-didnt/comment-page-2/#comment-2338059</link>
		<dc:creator>suckingeggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 16:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/oh-no-he-didnt/#comment-2338059</guid>
		<description>Do I smell burning martyrs? 

Something is shifting here, this place, the net, the communication mechanisms.  Twitter is at the forefront of it with the creation of instant micro blogging, what are we thinking and doing and who wants to consume the data. And more importantly that information is freely accessible, not controlled by corporations with no heart only the eye of the $.

The gatekeepers of the old guard have lost the battle. Books used to be locked up and chained inside churches to protect the information and knowledge from the people (sheeple in the eyes of the so called illuminists) The printing press changed all that, after many deaths ensued.

When radio came out if threatened the old guard, ARPA created networks, the networks created other networks and the media giants did not see the threat. DRM, intellectual property rights etc, its over all over. We are now the producers.

And here we sit on the cusp of the new dawn, the state is threatened, no one, no one! knows the true picture, nor see the the depth of the next revolution and enlightenment.

You guys are the self professed thought chiefs, prime enablers of this dawn, yet you act like the old guard, those gatekeepers are dead in the water ... think about that the next time you create content, and people create content above it.

The next new thing, is macro blogging mash-ups (tumblr&#039;s et al) for want of a better word. If twitter lives or die it does not matter, what matters is the new forms of communication  are not controlled by media companies, guru&#039;s of thought enablers.

So stop bitching and get a grip we are all in for an amazing ride.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do I smell burning martyrs? </p>
<p>Something is shifting here, this place, the net, the communication mechanisms.  Twitter is at the forefront of it with the creation of instant micro blogging, what are we thinking and doing and who wants to consume the data. And more importantly that information is freely accessible, not controlled by corporations with no heart only the eye of the $.</p>
<p>The gatekeepers of the old guard have lost the battle. Books used to be locked up and chained inside churches to protect the information and knowledge from the people (sheeple in the eyes of the so called illuminists) The printing press changed all that, after many deaths ensued.</p>
<p>When radio came out if threatened the old guard, ARPA created networks, the networks created other networks and the media giants did not see the threat. DRM, intellectual property rights etc, its over all over. We are now the producers.</p>
<p>And here we sit on the cusp of the new dawn, the state is threatened, no one, no one! knows the true picture, nor see the the depth of the next revolution and enlightenment.</p>
<p>You guys are the self professed thought chiefs, prime enablers of this dawn, yet you act like the old guard, those gatekeepers are dead in the water &#8230; think about that the next time you create content, and people create content above it.</p>
<p>The next new thing, is macro blogging mash-ups (tumblr&#8217;s et al) for want of a better word. If twitter lives or die it does not matter, what matters is the new forms of communication  are not controlled by media companies, guru&#8217;s of thought enablers.</p>
<p>So stop bitching and get a grip we are all in for an amazing ride.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toworse</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/oh-no-he-didnt/comment-page-2/#comment-2338042</link>
		<dc:creator>Toworse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 16:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/oh-no-he-didnt/#comment-2338042</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s start a reality show in the lines of &quot;Flav or Love&quot; and put Mike, Scoble and other in it .... Guess they will tweet themselves out of the show with such low standards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s start a reality show in the lines of &#8220;Flav or Love&#8221; and put Mike, Scoble and other in it &#8230;. Guess they will tweet themselves out of the show with such low standards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: apollo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/oh-no-he-didnt/comment-page-2/#comment-2338037</link>
		<dc:creator>apollo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 16:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/oh-no-he-didnt/#comment-2338037</guid>
		<description>Anyone else read this over at Venture Beat: Scoble broke Twitter not RoR
 http://venturebeat.com/2008/05/29/twitter-dont-blame-ruby-blame-scoble/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone else read this over at Venture Beat: Scoble broke Twitter not RoR<br />
 <a href="http://venturebeat.com/2008/05/29/twitter-dont-blame-ruby-blame-scoble/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://venturebeat.com/2008/05/29/twitter-dont-blame-ruby-blame-scoble/'>http://ventureb...y-blame-scoble/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EH</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/oh-no-he-didnt/comment-page-2/#comment-2338032</link>
		<dc:creator>EH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 16:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/oh-no-he-didnt/#comment-2338032</guid>
		<description>Scoble and Arrington are vying for the same position: the old guy on TMZ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scoble and Arrington are vying for the same position: the old guy on TMZ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MyMesh</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/oh-no-he-didnt/comment-page-2/#comment-2338030</link>
		<dc:creator>MyMesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 16:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/oh-no-he-didnt/#comment-2338030</guid>
		<description>The Twitter downtime issue was more than a technical issue. It had been for a long time an attitude issue, taking it for granted that the community will love them no matter what. Until very very recently. Which is a good thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Twitter downtime issue was more than a technical issue. It had been for a long time an attitude issue, taking it for granted that the community will love them no matter what. Until very very recently. Which is a good thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EH</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/oh-no-he-didnt/comment-page-2/#comment-2338029</link>
		<dc:creator>EH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 16:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/oh-no-he-didnt/#comment-2338029</guid>
		<description>Ha ha, toworse, I was thinking the same thing. People Magazine, US....there&#039;s a certain truth to some people being merely technical paparazzi.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha ha, toworse, I was thinking the same thing. People Magazine, US&#8230;.there&#8217;s a certain truth to some people being merely technical paparazzi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Scrivens</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/oh-no-he-didnt/comment-page-2/#comment-2338027</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Scrivens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 16:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/oh-no-he-didnt/#comment-2338027</guid>
		<description>&quot;I know the truth: that we’re both laughing all the way to the bank.&quot;

Am I the only one who read this and thought Scoble is a major cock? Who the hell says this in front of their audience? Oh yeah, Scoble says that kind of stuff in front of anyone, I forgot.

If you guys are going to rag on him at least put some identity behind your comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I know the truth: that we’re both laughing all the way to the bank.&#8221;</p>
<p>Am I the only one who read this and thought Scoble is a major cock? Who the hell says this in front of their audience? Oh yeah, Scoble says that kind of stuff in front of anyone, I forgot.</p>
<p>If you guys are going to rag on him at least put some identity behind your comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toworse</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/oh-no-he-didnt/comment-page-2/#comment-2338001</link>
		<dc:creator>Toworse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 16:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/oh-no-he-didnt/#comment-2338001</guid>
		<description>Sad to see this desperation Mike.
You sounds more like a Paparazzi these days.
Are you stalking Blaine Cook.
Do you have so much time in your hands that you sped hours scanning Baline and Scoble&#039;s tweets.
I am surprised to see you professionalism stoop to such low standards.

Techcruch these days is like the Inquirer that we usually avoid in the supermarket.

Scoble reminds me of a desperate loser.
Please dont become him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sad to see this desperation Mike.<br />
You sounds more like a Paparazzi these days.<br />
Are you stalking Blaine Cook.<br />
Do you have so much time in your hands that you sped hours scanning Baline and Scoble&#8217;s tweets.<br />
I am surprised to see you professionalism stoop to such low standards.</p>
<p>Techcruch these days is like the Inquirer that we usually avoid in the supermarket.</p>
<p>Scoble reminds me of a desperate loser.<br />
Please dont become him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sundar</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/oh-no-he-didnt/comment-page-2/#comment-2337991</link>
		<dc:creator>Sundar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 15:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/oh-no-he-didnt/#comment-2337991</guid>
		<description>Micheal, why are you always at the back of Blaine? Are you just scanning his tweets so that you can write a post about it. I think you can bring more value than that to your website. Please don&#039;t make your personal comments in here. It degrades the quality of TC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Micheal, why are you always at the back of Blaine? Are you just scanning his tweets so that you can write a post about it. I think you can bring more value than that to your website. Please don&#8217;t make your personal comments in here. It degrades the quality of TC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
