<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Celebrity Baby Blog is Acquired: People.com&#8217;s Gain Is FM Publishing&#8217;s Loss</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/celebrity-baby-blog-is-acquired-peoplecoms-gain-is-fm-publishings-loss/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/celebrity-baby-blog-is-acquired-peoplecoms-gain-is-fm-publishings-loss/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:02:46 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Christine</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/celebrity-baby-blog-is-acquired-peoplecoms-gain-is-fm-publishings-loss/comment-page-1/#comment-2804260</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 06:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/celebrity-baby-blog-is-acquired-peoplecoms-gain-is-fm-publishings-loss/#comment-2804260</guid>
		<description>Great article.  :)

Christine 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ibabystore.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ibabystore&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article.  <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Christine<br />
<a href="http://www.ibabystore.com" rel="nofollow">ibabystore</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Butch Decossas</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/celebrity-baby-blog-is-acquired-peoplecoms-gain-is-fm-publishings-loss/comment-page-1/#comment-2718548</link>
		<dc:creator>Butch Decossas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 18:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/celebrity-baby-blog-is-acquired-peoplecoms-gain-is-fm-publishings-loss/#comment-2718548</guid>
		<description>I really love strawberry cheesecake.


Butch Decossas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really love strawberry cheesecake.</p>
<p>Butch Decossas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Celebrity News</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/celebrity-baby-blog-is-acquired-peoplecoms-gain-is-fm-publishings-loss/comment-page-1/#comment-2596239</link>
		<dc:creator>Celebrity News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 20:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/celebrity-baby-blog-is-acquired-peoplecoms-gain-is-fm-publishings-loss/#comment-2596239</guid>
		<description>Good for them... Celebrity Baby Blog is a great site and nice pick up for FM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good for them&#8230; Celebrity Baby Blog is a great site and nice pick up for FM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: priceless</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/celebrity-baby-blog-is-acquired-peoplecoms-gain-is-fm-publishings-loss/comment-page-1/#comment-2589453</link>
		<dc:creator>priceless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 11:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/celebrity-baby-blog-is-acquired-peoplecoms-gain-is-fm-publishings-loss/#comment-2589453</guid>
		<description>money to be made</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>money to be made</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2008 Year End Acquisitions Post &#187; The StartUp Blog at PartnerUp</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/celebrity-baby-blog-is-acquired-peoplecoms-gain-is-fm-publishings-loss/comment-page-1/#comment-2586461</link>
		<dc:creator>2008 Year End Acquisitions Post &#187; The StartUp Blog at PartnerUp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/celebrity-baby-blog-is-acquired-peoplecoms-gain-is-fm-publishings-loss/#comment-2586461</guid>
		<description>[...] Baby Blog was started in 2004 by Danielle Friedland. TechCrunch &#124; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Baby Blog was started in 2004 by Danielle Friedland. TechCrunch | [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More Not-Bad News From Time Inc.: People.Com Booming &#124; Peter Kafka &#124; MediaMemo &#124; AllThingsD</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/celebrity-baby-blog-is-acquired-peoplecoms-gain-is-fm-publishings-loss/comment-page-1/#comment-2562949</link>
		<dc:creator>More Not-Bad News From Time Inc.: People.Com Booming &#124; Peter Kafka &#124; MediaMemo &#124; AllThingsD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 20:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/celebrity-baby-blog-is-acquired-peoplecoms-gain-is-fm-publishings-loss/#comment-2562949</guid>
		<description>[...] came via acquisition: When People.com bought Celebrity Baby Blog back in May, it was generating 6.9 million page views per month. Now it&#8217;s doing 30 million, Time execs say. And before my fellow journobloggers dismiss the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] came via acquisition: When People.com bought Celebrity Baby Blog back in May, it was generating 6.9 million page views per month. Now it&#8217;s doing 30 million, Time execs say. And before my fellow journobloggers dismiss the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charismatic</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/celebrity-baby-blog-is-acquired-peoplecoms-gain-is-fm-publishings-loss/comment-page-1/#comment-2558955</link>
		<dc:creator>charismatic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 11:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/celebrity-baby-blog-is-acquired-peoplecoms-gain-is-fm-publishings-loss/#comment-2558955</guid>
		<description>I would like to appreciate your efforts  you have made in writing this article. 
Cheers,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to appreciate your efforts  you have made in writing this article.<br />
Cheers,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peoplemagazine lover</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/celebrity-baby-blog-is-acquired-peoplecoms-gain-is-fm-publishings-loss/comment-page-1/#comment-2506877</link>
		<dc:creator>peoplemagazine lover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 14:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/celebrity-baby-blog-is-acquired-peoplecoms-gain-is-fm-publishings-loss/#comment-2506877</guid>
		<description>It is not only the ad space that counts on the specific site. I would think that there is a far greater plan behind this acquisition. Possibly pumping more loyal YAFS to the people network of sites, dominating a bigger part of the celebrity niche. The price is maybe not so relevant, as ROI will definitely come. But @Martins $8m seems very low.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not only the ad space that counts on the specific site. I would think that there is a far greater plan behind this acquisition. Possibly pumping more loyal YAFS to the people network of sites, dominating a bigger part of the celebrity niche. The price is maybe not so relevant, as ROI will definitely come. But @Martins $8m seems very low.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CBS Relaunches Dotspotter As TheInsider.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/celebrity-baby-blog-is-acquired-peoplecoms-gain-is-fm-publishings-loss/comment-page-1/#comment-2377413</link>
		<dc:creator>CBS Relaunches Dotspotter As TheInsider.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 20:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/celebrity-baby-blog-is-acquired-peoplecoms-gain-is-fm-publishings-loss/#comment-2377413</guid>
		<description>[...] celebrity/entertainment sites such as PopSugar or even People.com. (Although, People.com, which just bought Celebrity Baby Blog, is in a class by itself and doesn&#8217;t really need [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] celebrity/entertainment sites such as PopSugar or even People.com. (Although, People.com, which just bought Celebrity Baby Blog, is in a class by itself and doesn&#8217;t really need [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ncider</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/celebrity-baby-blog-is-acquired-peoplecoms-gain-is-fm-publishings-loss/comment-page-1/#comment-2369420</link>
		<dc:creator>Ncider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 15:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/celebrity-baby-blog-is-acquired-peoplecoms-gain-is-fm-publishings-loss/#comment-2369420</guid>
		<description>@23

1) You are assuming 100% of the inventory is sold directly, not thru remnant networks.  Never happens.  You&#039;re lucky if 50% is sold directly.

2) The *average* CPM is nowhere near $6.  When you factor in remnant, it&#039;s more like $2.

3) 10x revenue is at the high end of the range, but we&#039;ll use it.  Uniques is also a major factor.

$2 x 7k x 12 x 10 = $1.68mil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@23</p>
<p>1) You are assuming 100% of the inventory is sold directly, not thru remnant networks.  Never happens.  You&#8217;re lucky if 50% is sold directly.</p>
<p>2) The *average* CPM is nowhere near $6.  When you factor in remnant, it&#8217;s more like $2.</p>
<p>3) 10x revenue is at the high end of the range, but we&#8217;ll use it.  Uniques is also a major factor.</p>
<p>$2 x 7k x 12 x 10 = $1.68mil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Race of the ad networks: Federated Media snags DeveloperShed&#8217;s 6M page views &#187; VentureBeat</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/celebrity-baby-blog-is-acquired-peoplecoms-gain-is-fm-publishings-loss/comment-page-1/#comment-2351329</link>
		<dc:creator>Race of the ad networks: Federated Media snags DeveloperShed&#8217;s 6M page views &#187; VentureBeat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 05:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/celebrity-baby-blog-is-acquired-peoplecoms-gain-is-fm-publishings-loss/#comment-2351329</guid>
		<description>[...] its users. DeveloperShed also has far more page views and visitors than Celebrity Baby&#8217;s 6.9 million and 720,000 unique in April, according to Comscore.  The DeveloperShed deal will be announced tomorrow. DeveloperShed own 12 sites, which feature [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] its users. DeveloperShed also has far more page views and visitors than Celebrity Baby&#8217;s 6.9 million and 720,000 unique in April, according to Comscore.  The DeveloperShed deal will be announced tomorrow. DeveloperShed own 12 sites, which feature [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/celebrity-baby-blog-is-acquired-peoplecoms-gain-is-fm-publishings-loss/comment-page-1/#comment-2342794</link>
		<dc:creator>richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 11:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/celebrity-baby-blog-is-acquired-peoplecoms-gain-is-fm-publishings-loss/#comment-2342794</guid>
		<description>@23...if you can get 10x, good luck to them for a blog with predictable traffic growth and no tied in earn-out.

So, what will Arrington sell Techcrunch for?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@23&#8230;if you can get 10x, good luck to them for a blog with predictable traffic growth and no tied in earn-out.</p>
<p>So, what will Arrington sell Techcrunch for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; Celebrity Baby Blog買収でPeople.comのゲインはFM Publishingのロス</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/celebrity-baby-blog-is-acquired-peoplecoms-gain-is-fm-publishings-loss/comment-page-1/#comment-2338796</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; Celebrity Baby Blog買収でPeople.comのゲインはFM Publishingのロス</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 00:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/celebrity-baby-blog-is-acquired-peoplecoms-gain-is-fm-publishings-loss/#comment-2338796</guid>
		<description>[...] [原文へ] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [原文へ] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: todd g</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/celebrity-baby-blog-is-acquired-peoplecoms-gain-is-fm-publishings-loss/comment-page-1/#comment-2338666</link>
		<dc:creator>todd g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 22:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/celebrity-baby-blog-is-acquired-peoplecoms-gain-is-fm-publishings-loss/#comment-2338666</guid>
		<description>@ #5 Chris, no way.  Maybe for bigger ad buys where they only care about branding, but with smaller stuff like what we sell advertisers convert, really well.  on niche sites there&#039;s still great arbitrage opportunity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ #5 Chris, no way.  Maybe for bigger ad buys where they only care about branding, but with smaller stuff like what we sell advertisers convert, really well.  on niche sites there&#8217;s still great arbitrage opportunity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/celebrity-baby-blog-is-acquired-peoplecoms-gain-is-fm-publishings-loss/comment-page-1/#comment-2338633</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 22:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/celebrity-baby-blog-is-acquired-peoplecoms-gain-is-fm-publishings-loss/#comment-2338633</guid>
		<description>@25

&quot;A celebrity baby blog on a technology news site? How many in the tech community follow britney spears’ kids? Also a blog about celebrities raising babies seems mis categorized as parenting advice.&quot;

Who really gives a f**k about the content, it is middle of the road piece about a business being sold, get over yourself.

&quot;How many digs does it take to break a relationship? You’ve done at least 3 posts trashing federated media. Are you trying to get better ad rates, launching a competing ad network or are you shorting their business in some way?&quot;

How is this post trashing FM, if anything this is a great bit of marketing for them, if I was John I would be really happy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@25</p>
<p>&#8220;A celebrity baby blog on a technology news site? How many in the tech community follow britney spears’ kids? Also a blog about celebrities raising babies seems mis categorized as parenting advice.&#8221;</p>
<p>Who really gives a f**k about the content, it is middle of the road piece about a business being sold, get over yourself.</p>
<p>&#8220;How many digs does it take to break a relationship? You’ve done at least 3 posts trashing federated media. Are you trying to get better ad rates, launching a competing ad network or are you shorting their business in some way?&#8221;</p>
<p>How is this post trashing FM, if anything this is a great bit of marketing for them, if I was John I would be really happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TC proofreder</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/celebrity-baby-blog-is-acquired-peoplecoms-gain-is-fm-publishings-loss/comment-page-1/#comment-2338586</link>
		<dc:creator>TC proofreder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 22:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/celebrity-baby-blog-is-acquired-peoplecoms-gain-is-fm-publishings-loss/#comment-2338586</guid>
		<description>A celebrity baby blog on a technology news site?  How many in the tech community follow britney spears&#039; kids?  Also a blog about celebrities raising babies seems mis categorized as parenting advice.

How many digs does it take to break a relationship?  You&#039;ve done at least  3 posts trashing federated media. Are you trying to get better ad rates, launching a competing ad network or are you shorting their business in some way?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A celebrity baby blog on a technology news site?  How many in the tech community follow britney spears&#8217; kids?  Also a blog about celebrities raising babies seems mis categorized as parenting advice.</p>
<p>How many digs does it take to break a relationship?  You&#8217;ve done at least  3 posts trashing federated media. Are you trying to get better ad rates, launching a competing ad network or are you shorting their business in some way?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackmayhofferr</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/celebrity-baby-blog-is-acquired-peoplecoms-gain-is-fm-publishings-loss/comment-page-1/#comment-2338524</link>
		<dc:creator>jackmayhofferr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 21:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/celebrity-baby-blog-is-acquired-peoplecoms-gain-is-fm-publishings-loss/#comment-2338524</guid>
		<description>@ Dave 

My point is, none of us are good at &quot;guessing&quot; valuations. Even the mighty TC and it&#039;s staff of crackerjack reporters (errr Bloggers).  

Although, don&#039;t be so hard on yourself Dave. According to #21, you did were right in there with a decent estimate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Dave </p>
<p>My point is, none of us are good at &#8220;guessing&#8221; valuations. Even the mighty TC and it&#8217;s staff of crackerjack reporters (errr Bloggers).  </p>
<p>Although, don&#8217;t be so hard on yourself Dave. According to #21, you did were right in there with a decent estimate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/celebrity-baby-blog-is-acquired-peoplecoms-gain-is-fm-publishings-loss/comment-page-1/#comment-2338482</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 20:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/celebrity-baby-blog-is-acquired-peoplecoms-gain-is-fm-publishings-loss/#comment-2338482</guid>
		<description>7 million page views

low = $3 cpm = $21k pm or $252,000 pa
med = $6 cpm = $42 pm or $504,000 pa
high = $10 cpm = $70k pm or $840,000 pa
v.high = $15 cpm = $105kpm or $1.26 mill pa

x10 revenue, ergo range of 2.5 million to 11.26 million

@20 - Now that is exactly why i didn&#039;t bother, I am neither good at it or paid to do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>7 million page views</p>
<p>low = $3 cpm = $21k pm or $252,000 pa<br />
med = $6 cpm = $42 pm or $504,000 pa<br />
high = $10 cpm = $70k pm or $840,000 pa<br />
v.high = $15 cpm = $105kpm or $1.26 mill pa</p>
<p>x10 revenue, ergo range of 2.5 million to 11.26 million</p>
<p>@20 &#8211; Now that is exactly why i didn&#8217;t bother, I am neither good at it or paid to do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackmayhofferr</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/celebrity-baby-blog-is-acquired-peoplecoms-gain-is-fm-publishings-loss/comment-page-1/#comment-2338455</link>
		<dc:creator>jackmayhofferr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 20:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/celebrity-baby-blog-is-acquired-peoplecoms-gain-is-fm-publishings-loss/#comment-2338455</guid>
		<description>@ Martin 

You say you can confirm the purchase price. Please Do.  

Please give us a legitimate source, so we know that you are nit blowing smoke up our asses

this shouldn&#039;t be hard based on you comment above</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Martin </p>
<p>You say you can confirm the purchase price. Please Do.  </p>
<p>Please give us a legitimate source, so we know that you are nit blowing smoke up our asses</p>
<p>this shouldn&#8217;t be hard based on you comment above</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Celebrity Baby News is Despicable</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/celebrity-baby-blog-is-acquired-peoplecoms-gain-is-fm-publishings-loss/comment-page-1/#comment-2338449</link>
		<dc:creator>Celebrity Baby News is Despicable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 20:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/celebrity-baby-blog-is-acquired-peoplecoms-gain-is-fm-publishings-loss/#comment-2338449</guid>
		<description>[...] I saw the oddly-named baby of someone famous on the cover of People magazine. And today, I read on TechCrunch that, coincidentally, People.com has bought Celebrity Baby Blog for an undisclosed sum: Celebrity [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I saw the oddly-named baby of someone famous on the cover of People magazine. And today, I read on TechCrunch that, coincidentally, People.com has bought Celebrity Baby Blog for an undisclosed sum: Celebrity [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/celebrity-baby-blog-is-acquired-peoplecoms-gain-is-fm-publishings-loss/comment-page-1/#comment-2338440</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 20:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/celebrity-baby-blog-is-acquired-peoplecoms-gain-is-fm-publishings-loss/#comment-2338440</guid>
		<description>I can confirm that the blog was acquired for $8,000,000</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can confirm that the blog was acquired for $8,000,000</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackmayhofferr</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/celebrity-baby-blog-is-acquired-peoplecoms-gain-is-fm-publishings-loss/comment-page-1/#comment-2338389</link>
		<dc:creator>jackmayhofferr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 20:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/celebrity-baby-blog-is-acquired-peoplecoms-gain-is-fm-publishings-loss/#comment-2338389</guid>
		<description>David 

why don&#039;t you throw out a price instead of complaining that TC did speculate on the price.  Time has no obligation to make public the purchase price unless it is a significant portion of their market cap. In this case, they don&#039;t need to.  

so how about Dave?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David </p>
<p>why don&#8217;t you throw out a price instead of complaining that TC did speculate on the price.  Time has no obligation to make public the purchase price unless it is a significant portion of their market cap. In this case, they don&#8217;t need to.  </p>
<p>so how about Dave?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/celebrity-baby-blog-is-acquired-peoplecoms-gain-is-fm-publishings-loss/comment-page-1/#comment-2338357</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 19:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/celebrity-baby-blog-is-acquired-peoplecoms-gain-is-fm-publishings-loss/#comment-2338357</guid>
		<description>Come on....lets have a price, little disappointed it is just ignored in the original piece TC = :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on&#8230;.lets have a price, little disappointed it is just ignored in the original piece TC = <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe M.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/celebrity-baby-blog-is-acquired-peoplecoms-gain-is-fm-publishings-loss/comment-page-1/#comment-2338347</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 19:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/celebrity-baby-blog-is-acquired-peoplecoms-gain-is-fm-publishings-loss/#comment-2338347</guid>
		<description>@17,

I didn&#039;t say its a business model.  Its an option.  You get incremental revenue from the people who sign up and you still sell ads for the majority that don&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@17,</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t say its a business model.  Its an option.  You get incremental revenue from the people who sign up and you still sell ads for the majority that don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackmayhofferr</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/celebrity-baby-blog-is-acquired-peoplecoms-gain-is-fm-publishings-loss/comment-page-1/#comment-2338332</link>
		<dc:creator>jackmayhofferr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 19:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/celebrity-baby-blog-is-acquired-peoplecoms-gain-is-fm-publishings-loss/#comment-2338332</guid>
		<description>@ Chris and Sports Tech, 

It may be easy and cheap to implement, but the model only works if enough people subscribe.  Which in most cases as been proven that not enough subs can be acquired to make such a program successful</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Chris and Sports Tech, </p>
<p>It may be easy and cheap to implement, but the model only works if enough people subscribe.  Which in most cases as been proven that not enough subs can be acquired to make such a program successful</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
