<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Online Realtors Win Rights to Housing Database</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/27/online-realtors-win-rights-to-housing-database/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/27/online-realtors-win-rights-to-housing-database/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 06:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/27/online-realtors-win-rights-to-housing-database/#comment-2336895</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 00:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/27/online-realtors-win-rights-to-housing-database/#comment-2336895</guid>
		<description>I'm a mortgage originator from Wells Fargo in California. How does this company pick their finance parnters?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a mortgage originator from Wells Fargo in California. How does this company pick their finance parnters?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MM</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/27/online-realtors-win-rights-to-housing-database/#comment-2336443</link>
		<dc:creator>MM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 18:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/27/online-realtors-win-rights-to-housing-database/#comment-2336443</guid>
		<description>I do wish these companies luck and think it's great to stimulate competition while also pumping so much money into their local economies by hiring all the people within each of the online brokerages infrastructures. And do hope they keep all these jobs in the USA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do wish these companies luck and think it&#8217;s great to stimulate competition while also pumping so much money into their local economies by hiring all the people within each of the online brokerages infrastructures. And do hope they keep all these jobs in the USA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MM</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/27/online-realtors-win-rights-to-housing-database/#comment-2336428</link>
		<dc:creator>MM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 18:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/27/online-realtors-win-rights-to-housing-database/#comment-2336428</guid>
		<description>@sep
thank you

@ sep &#38; Mike Brown
Thank You. Nicely written &#38; very accurate. 

For all of those who think online brokerages are going to skyrocket and become the next big thing consider what Mike said above and ask yourself this -
If selling a home is so very simple, then why didn't For Sale By Owner (FSBO) ever "take off," or force the traditional real estate model to a grinding stop?

Short answer - Because it does not work (for the most part).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@sep<br />
thank you</p>
<p>@ sep &amp; Mike Brown<br />
Thank You. Nicely written &amp; very accurate. </p>
<p>For all of those who think online brokerages are going to skyrocket and become the next big thing consider what Mike said above and ask yourself this -<br />
If selling a home is so very simple, then why didn&#8217;t For Sale By Owner (FSBO) ever &#8220;take off,&#8221; or force the traditional real estate model to a grinding stop?</p>
<p>Short answer - Because it does not work (for the most part).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve DelBianco</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/27/online-realtors-win-rights-to-housing-database/#comment-2336047</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve DelBianco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 15:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/27/online-realtors-win-rights-to-housing-database/#comment-2336047</guid>
		<description>As someone who advocates every day for convenience, choice and commerce on the Internet, I am happy to see this settlement reached.  NAR must now actively encourage Realtors to invest in technology and try new ways of providing information and service to home buyers and sellers if they want to remain relevant in the future.  For more insight:  http://blog.netchoice.org/2008/05/just-in-time-re.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone who advocates every day for convenience, choice and commerce on the Internet, I am happy to see this settlement reached.  NAR must now actively encourage Realtors to invest in technology and try new ways of providing information and service to home buyers and sellers if they want to remain relevant in the future.  For more insight:  <a href="http://blog.netchoice.org/2008/05/just-in-time-re.html" rel="nofollow">http://blog.netchoice.org/2008.....me-re.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/27/online-realtors-win-rights-to-housing-database/#comment-2335994</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 14:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/27/online-realtors-win-rights-to-housing-database/#comment-2335994</guid>
		<description>No one has mentioned that the data we are all fighting over is maintained by Realtors. Realtors take the listings, fill out the forms on the MLS and when something about the listing changes the Realtors update the data, sometimes Realtors spend hundreds of dollars on photos, websites and video and you want them to give this info away for free? 
What happens when average home owners maintain the info? Sales dates are not recorded, sale prices are not recorded, stale and erroneous info is left in the database. I'm not claiming Realtors are perfect or rocket scientists but if you get rid of them who will diligently maintain the info and unlock the doors? Do you want just anyone to enter your house at any time while it is for sale? Do you have the time to stay home from work to show your home seven days a week 12 hours a day?  Many Realtors also spend a good deal of money and time advertising and promoting properties. Did you know that the 6% so many of you mentioned does not go directly to the Realtor? It's usually split between a number of people. Quite often the listing agent keeps less than 2% for him/herself. Even when the Realtor gets both sides of the deal he/she still has to share with the broker. This can range from 50% to 20% of the commission.
Sure there are some slimy agents out there and there may be some making well over a six figure income but the last I heard the average agent makes less than $35,000 a year. Does that sound like they are all overpaid and worthless?

Just because you don't see all the crap Realtors have to put up with does not mean that they are overpaid. These days even plumbers and auto mechanics can make a good income. You could unclog your own toilet and grease your own automobile moving parts but do you really want to and could you do it as quickly?

In your opinion what is a Realtors time worth? How much should they be paid for selling a home? What's a fair income for an agent who is on call seven days a week and puts in 60 hours of work a week? Most Realtors don't make a salary, they only get paid when something sells.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one has mentioned that the data we are all fighting over is maintained by Realtors. Realtors take the listings, fill out the forms on the MLS and when something about the listing changes the Realtors update the data, sometimes Realtors spend hundreds of dollars on photos, websites and video and you want them to give this info away for free?<br />
What happens when average home owners maintain the info? Sales dates are not recorded, sale prices are not recorded, stale and erroneous info is left in the database. I&#8217;m not claiming Realtors are perfect or rocket scientists but if you get rid of them who will diligently maintain the info and unlock the doors? Do you want just anyone to enter your house at any time while it is for sale? Do you have the time to stay home from work to show your home seven days a week 12 hours a day?  Many Realtors also spend a good deal of money and time advertising and promoting properties. Did you know that the 6% so many of you mentioned does not go directly to the Realtor? It&#8217;s usually split between a number of people. Quite often the listing agent keeps less than 2% for him/herself. Even when the Realtor gets both sides of the deal he/she still has to share with the broker. This can range from 50% to 20% of the commission.<br />
Sure there are some slimy agents out there and there may be some making well over a six figure income but the last I heard the average agent makes less than $35,000 a year. Does that sound like they are all overpaid and worthless?</p>
<p>Just because you don&#8217;t see all the crap Realtors have to put up with does not mean that they are overpaid. These days even plumbers and auto mechanics can make a good income. You could unclog your own toilet and grease your own automobile moving parts but do you really want to and could you do it as quickly?</p>
<p>In your opinion what is a Realtors time worth? How much should they be paid for selling a home? What&#8217;s a fair income for an agent who is on call seven days a week and puts in 60 hours of work a week? Most Realtors don&#8217;t make a salary, they only get paid when something sells.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A. Longo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/27/online-realtors-win-rights-to-housing-database/#comment-2335794</link>
		<dc:creator>A. Longo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 13:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/27/online-realtors-win-rights-to-housing-database/#comment-2335794</guid>
		<description>Not quite sure this is a win for us just yet.  I suspect much red tape to come down the line very quickly from the NAR as they still have some grips on how new innovative tools &#38; widgets that we use may be effected.  (Darn attorneys).

Currently we allow comments on listings &#38; some AVM tools for every home...I guess we will see how fast this goes into action.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not quite sure this is a win for us just yet.  I suspect much red tape to come down the line very quickly from the NAR as they still have some grips on how new innovative tools &amp; widgets that we use may be effected.  (Darn attorneys).</p>
<p>Currently we allow comments on listings &amp; some AVM tools for every home&#8230;I guess we will see how fast this goes into action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cooter McGee</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/27/online-realtors-win-rights-to-housing-database/#comment-2334469</link>
		<dc:creator>Cooter McGee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 23:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/27/online-realtors-win-rights-to-housing-database/#comment-2334469</guid>
		<description>Well, these online realtors will have next 6-18 months to work the bugs out before anyone starts looking to buy in this crapper of a real estate market again.

And hey, in San Diego, I see houses down about 40% in value from last year, yet I don't see many realtors lowering their commission rates to help the beleaguered homeowner.

6% commission - deadpool</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, these online realtors will have next 6-18 months to work the bugs out before anyone starts looking to buy in this crapper of a real estate market again.</p>
<p>And hey, in San Diego, I see houses down about 40% in value from last year, yet I don&#8217;t see many realtors lowering their commission rates to help the beleaguered homeowner.</p>
<p>6% commission - deadpool</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: May 28, 2008 &#124; next media update</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/27/online-realtors-win-rights-to-housing-database/#comment-2334441</link>
		<dc:creator>May 28, 2008 &#124; next media update</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 23:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/27/online-realtors-win-rights-to-housing-database/#comment-2334441</guid>
		<description>[...] Online Realtors Win Rights to Housing Database TECHCRUNCH The National Association of Realtors has settled its antitrust case with the Department of Justice, and has given online realtors full access to the industry-standard Multiple Listing Service (MLS) Databases. The MLS is a comprehensive listing of homes that are available on the housing market, and until this point the NAR has restricted access to online brokers. These online brokers have been offering fees that are significantly lower than traditional realtor rates, and rather than adapt as an industry, the NAR choose to withhold the essential data. The Department of Justice took issue with this stance, and filed suit in September 2005. The deal is especially important for disruptive online-only companies like Redfin , which rely on being able to access current home listings. Source&#62; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Online Realtors Win Rights to Housing Database TECHCRUNCH The National Association of Realtors has settled its antitrust case with the Department of Justice, and has given online realtors full access to the industry-standard Multiple Listing Service (MLS) Databases. The MLS is a comprehensive listing of homes that are available on the housing market, and until this point the NAR has restricted access to online brokers. These online brokers have been offering fees that are significantly lower than traditional realtor rates, and rather than adapt as an industry, the NAR choose to withhold the essential data. The Department of Justice took issue with this stance, and filed suit in September 2005. The deal is especially important for disruptive online-only companies like Redfin , which rely on being able to access current home listings. Source&gt; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/27/online-realtors-win-rights-to-housing-database/#comment-2334237</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 21:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/27/online-realtors-win-rights-to-housing-database/#comment-2334237</guid>
		<description>Has no one here heard of ZipRealty? or the fact that the MLS is available currently on line to everyone? The NAR is a professional organization which of course is going to attempt to protect the livelyhoods of its members. Why shouldn't they? I think that this ruling was a defeat for Redfin as it has destroyed their ability to use conversational marketing as a tool to sell homes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has no one here heard of ZipRealty? or the fact that the MLS is available currently on line to everyone? The NAR is a professional organization which of course is going to attempt to protect the livelyhoods of its members. Why shouldn&#8217;t they? I think that this ruling was a defeat for Redfin as it has destroyed their ability to use conversational marketing as a tool to sell homes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/27/online-realtors-win-rights-to-housing-database/#comment-2333818</link>
		<dc:creator>clo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 17:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/27/online-realtors-win-rights-to-housing-database/#comment-2333818</guid>
		<description>According to the ruling, these 'new' rules only apply to VOW sites, not IDX websites. As far as I know, Redfin is an IDX site, so I don't think any of this affects them at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the ruling, these &#8216;new&#8217; rules only apply to VOW sites, not IDX websites. As far as I know, Redfin is an IDX site, so I don&#8217;t think any of this affects them at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/27/online-realtors-win-rights-to-housing-database/#comment-2333809</link>
		<dc:creator>clo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 17:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/27/online-realtors-win-rights-to-housing-database/#comment-2333809</guid>
		<description>Comments on homes have been around since 2006:

http://www.realestatejournal.com/buysell/markettrends/20060907-delaney.html

Redfin isn't the first to come up with this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comments on homes have been around since 2006:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.realestatejournal.com/buysell/markettrends/20060907-delaney.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.realestatejournal.c.....laney.html</a></p>
<p>Redfin isn&#8217;t the first to come up with this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Clark</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/27/online-realtors-win-rights-to-housing-database/#comment-2333648</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 16:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/27/online-realtors-win-rights-to-housing-database/#comment-2333648</guid>
		<description>@ Sep

Kevin (what's up Kevin?) said it right...."Good luck".  We actually had plans of taking our SF model into other markets, but like Kevin said, each and every single MLS is different.  We simply didn't have the time or capacity to do so.  It is a frickin nightmare!  I actually didn't have to pay any fees for our access to the local MLS data, but I believe that to be because I am a member of SFAR and NAR.  Like I said, outside companies might have a bit more trouble.   

@MM and David #20

It is a long hard battle and the NAR and all of the Realtors will put up a HUGE fight against change.  It has been my experience that it is true the travel industry was shaken up, but buying an airline ticket is different than buying a house.  You cannot buy a house off of pictures alone (although I did 5 times, but they were investments), and there are too many variables of a transaction that a computer/program likely will never be able to duplicate/replace.   You guys are spot on...at least for now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Sep</p>
<p>Kevin (what&#8217;s up Kevin?) said it right&#8230;.&#8221;Good luck&#8221;.  We actually had plans of taking our SF model into other markets, but like Kevin said, each and every single MLS is different.  We simply didn&#8217;t have the time or capacity to do so.  It is a frickin nightmare!  I actually didn&#8217;t have to pay any fees for our access to the local MLS data, but I believe that to be because I am a member of SFAR and NAR.  Like I said, outside companies might have a bit more trouble.   </p>
<p>@MM and David #20</p>
<p>It is a long hard battle and the NAR and all of the Realtors will put up a HUGE fight against change.  It has been my experience that it is true the travel industry was shaken up, but buying an airline ticket is different than buying a house.  You cannot buy a house off of pictures alone (although I did 5 times, but they were investments), and there are too many variables of a transaction that a computer/program likely will never be able to duplicate/replace.   You guys are spot on&#8230;at least for now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hustle Strategy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/27/online-realtors-win-rights-to-housing-database/#comment-2333457</link>
		<dc:creator>Hustle Strategy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 15:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/27/online-realtors-win-rights-to-housing-database/#comment-2333457</guid>
		<description>this could be great news, hopefully some of these sites will present a decent search.  realtor.com is not the best, especially if you have an address of a home and want to just check the details of it, it can be frustrating...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this could be great news, hopefully some of these sites will present a decent search.  realtor.com is not the best, especially if you have an address of a home and want to just check the details of it, it can be frustrating&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Ramirez</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/27/online-realtors-win-rights-to-housing-database/#comment-2333383</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Ramirez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 14:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/27/online-realtors-win-rights-to-housing-database/#comment-2333383</guid>
		<description>Anything to put those 6% wannabes to rest. However the biggest problem with real estate in America is too many people still have way too much of themselves invested in their home (in many cases its their only asset) thus they are having a hard time accepting that residential real estate is not a good investment - its just better than paying rent if (and its a still a big IF) you can pay the same or less than if you rent . In the end it won't help the industry or economy in terms of any kind of recovery because we are in need of major league correction which is more related to the end of the lax credit that help drive this liar based industry but once the dust settles I expect to see a much more efficient and an empowered buyer aware market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anything to put those 6% wannabes to rest. However the biggest problem with real estate in America is too many people still have way too much of themselves invested in their home (in many cases its their only asset) thus they are having a hard time accepting that residential real estate is not a good investment - its just better than paying rent if (and its a still a big IF) you can pay the same or less than if you rent . In the end it won&#8217;t help the industry or economy in terms of any kind of recovery because we are in need of major league correction which is more related to the end of the lax credit that help drive this liar based industry but once the dust settles I expect to see a much more efficient and an empowered buyer aware market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MM</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/27/online-realtors-win-rights-to-housing-database/#comment-2332886</link>
		<dc:creator>MM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 11:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/27/online-realtors-win-rights-to-housing-database/#comment-2332886</guid>
		<description>David (#20) is correct for the reasons he stated above and about a dozen more that are not covered anywhere in this story or comments. All for which these online real estate sites will not make it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David (#20) is correct for the reasons he stated above and about a dozen more that are not covered anywhere in this story or comments. All for which these online real estate sites will not make it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jro</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/27/online-realtors-win-rights-to-housing-database/#comment-2332484</link>
		<dc:creator>jro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 06:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/27/online-realtors-win-rights-to-housing-database/#comment-2332484</guid>
		<description>@Tony 13 - that information might be useful, but I doubt that quality of information will be acquired.  But by all means have people add all the comments they want.  I question the quality, accuracy and *gaming* of the information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tony 13 - that information might be useful, but I doubt that quality of information will be acquired.  But by all means have people add all the comments they want.  I question the quality, accuracy and *gaming* of the information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Boer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/27/online-realtors-win-rights-to-housing-database/#comment-2332423</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Boer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 05:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/27/online-realtors-win-rights-to-housing-database/#comment-2332423</guid>
		<description>@sep -- Good luck.  There are ~900 MLS's in the country, each with their own registration procedures, data display rules, data formats, and rules.  It can cost as much as $500/month to get a data feed from one of these MLS's.  It's just crazy.  One of them will allow you to publicly display these 25 attributes; the one in the neighboring county will have a different list of 28 attributes.

@djlosch -- Crap realtors, of whom there are plenty, are perhaps just "customer service jobs."  The good ones, thankfully, are more akin to other professionals -- coders, consultants, attorneys, doctors, etc.  Doing a home transaction is considerably more complicated than, say, taking orders at a McDonald's drive-through.  So it's unlikely the profession will ever be replaced "by a simple database."

@Mighty Sam -- The notion of Realtors withholding listings from the MLS is, in my experience, something like the Lochness Monster -- vague hints of being true, but very few actual confirmed sightings.  In the good ol' days when product flew off the shelf in a weekend, a handful of ne'er-do-good'er Realtors would do the old "double-end" trick:  "forget" to put a property on the MLS, do open houses anyways, then sucker some unsuspecting buyer into using said Realtor to do both sides of the transaction.  2X commission = 2X $.  Now that sales have slowed and homes are taking some actual effort to sell, I rarely if ever see that happening these days.  There are still ways of double-ending a deal, but not putting a listing in the MLS is not an easy way of doing so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@sep &#8212; Good luck.  There are ~900 MLS&#8217;s in the country, each with their own registration procedures, data display rules, data formats, and rules.  It can cost as much as $500/month to get a data feed from one of these MLS&#8217;s.  It&#8217;s just crazy.  One of them will allow you to publicly display these 25 attributes; the one in the neighboring county will have a different list of 28 attributes.</p>
<p>@djlosch &#8212; Crap realtors, of whom there are plenty, are perhaps just &#8220;customer service jobs.&#8221;  The good ones, thankfully, are more akin to other professionals &#8212; coders, consultants, attorneys, doctors, etc.  Doing a home transaction is considerably more complicated than, say, taking orders at a McDonald&#8217;s drive-through.  So it&#8217;s unlikely the profession will ever be replaced &#8220;by a simple database.&#8221;</p>
<p>@Mighty Sam &#8212; The notion of Realtors withholding listings from the MLS is, in my experience, something like the Lochness Monster &#8212; vague hints of being true, but very few actual confirmed sightings.  In the good ol&#8217; days when product flew off the shelf in a weekend, a handful of ne&#8217;er-do-good&#8217;er Realtors would do the old &#8220;double-end&#8221; trick:  &#8220;forget&#8221; to put a property on the MLS, do open houses anyways, then sucker some unsuspecting buyer into using said Realtor to do both sides of the transaction.  2X commission = 2X $.  Now that sales have slowed and homes are taking some actual effort to sell, I rarely if ever see that happening these days.  There are still ways of double-ending a deal, but not putting a listing in the MLS is not an easy way of doing so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sep</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/27/online-realtors-win-rights-to-housing-database/#comment-2332393</link>
		<dc:creator>Sep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 04:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/27/online-realtors-win-rights-to-housing-database/#comment-2332393</guid>
		<description>Alex - say I want to do make my own mini-Redfin (for argument sakes). How exactly do I go about getting access to NAR (fees? delivery mechanism? etc etc)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex - say I want to do make my own mini-Redfin (for argument sakes). How exactly do I go about getting access to NAR (fees? delivery mechanism? etc etc)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trademanufacturer.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/27/online-realtors-win-rights-to-housing-database/#comment-2332370</link>
		<dc:creator>trademanufacturer.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 04:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/27/online-realtors-win-rights-to-housing-database/#comment-2332370</guid>
		<description>realty suffers extensively from pro-marketing ?please plain...thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>realty suffers extensively from pro-marketing ?please plain&#8230;thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: djlosch</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/27/online-realtors-win-rights-to-housing-database/#comment-2332357</link>
		<dc:creator>djlosch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 04:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/27/online-realtors-win-rights-to-housing-database/#comment-2332357</guid>
		<description>i see this as a combination of things.  realtors don't want to be replaced by a simple database just like so many customer service jobs already have. 

also, realty suffers extensively from pro-marketing -- the idea that they only list the pros of a property, and never any of the cons.  a simple example is washer/dryers in apartments.  most places that have it will say it, the places that don't won't mention it.  the place that leaves it off will sell better than the place that discloses it doesn't have it.  if onliners put in that information, sales will be reduced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i see this as a combination of things.  realtors don&#8217;t want to be replaced by a simple database just like so many customer service jobs already have. </p>
<p>also, realty suffers extensively from pro-marketing &#8212; the idea that they only list the pros of a property, and never any of the cons.  a simple example is washer/dryers in apartments.  most places that have it will say it, the places that don&#8217;t won&#8217;t mention it.  the place that leaves it off will sell better than the place that discloses it doesn&#8217;t have it.  if onliners put in that information, sales will be reduced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Clark</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/27/online-realtors-win-rights-to-housing-database/#comment-2332314</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 03:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/27/online-realtors-win-rights-to-housing-database/#comment-2332314</guid>
		<description>@ Sep,

What data are you referring to?  Data from the original post about NAR allowing access, or data that sites like Redfin are churning out?  

For my local MLS (San Francisco) I had to beg, borrow and steal  for over one year to get permission to download and re-transmit MLS data in a different format as a "third party vendor" for my real estate newsletter biz (sfnewsletter).  The process was painful!  Not painful because they required so much of me, but painful because something so simple as signing a contract and tweaking it to accommodate our modified needs took ages to get through the legal department.  Local associations of Realtors guard that information very closely.  In the end I prevailed and can now publish sold data in real time to my list of readers, but it will be quite some time before companies that to NAR appear hostile will have access to that same data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Sep,</p>
<p>What data are you referring to?  Data from the original post about NAR allowing access, or data that sites like Redfin are churning out?  </p>
<p>For my local MLS (San Francisco) I had to beg, borrow and steal  for over one year to get permission to download and re-transmit MLS data in a different format as a &#8220;third party vendor&#8221; for my real estate newsletter biz (sfnewsletter).  The process was painful!  Not painful because they required so much of me, but painful because something so simple as signing a contract and tweaking it to accommodate our modified needs took ages to get through the legal department.  Local associations of Realtors guard that information very closely.  In the end I prevailed and can now publish sold data in real time to my list of readers, but it will be quite some time before companies that to NAR appear hostile will have access to that same data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sep</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/27/online-realtors-win-rights-to-housing-database/#comment-2332270</link>
		<dc:creator>Sep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 02:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/27/online-realtors-win-rights-to-housing-database/#comment-2332270</guid>
		<description>I don't see exactly how one goes about getting access to the data?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see exactly how one goes about getting access to the data?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin gao</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/27/online-realtors-win-rights-to-housing-database/#comment-2332264</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin gao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 02:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/27/online-realtors-win-rights-to-housing-database/#comment-2332264</guid>
		<description>its a step in the right direction...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its a step in the right direction&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zain</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/27/online-realtors-win-rights-to-housing-database/#comment-2332238</link>
		<dc:creator>zain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 02:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/27/online-realtors-win-rights-to-housing-database/#comment-2332238</guid>
		<description>@david: why not? I don't need a babysitter to walk me through the house buying process. I can pick out a house myself. I need someone to fill out the paperwork. The $15,000+ cash I get back is just icing on the cake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@david: why not? I don&#8217;t need a babysitter to walk me through the house buying process. I can pick out a house myself. I need someone to fill out the paperwork. The $15,000+ cash I get back is just icing on the cake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Q dub</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/27/online-realtors-win-rights-to-housing-database/#comment-2332236</link>
		<dc:creator>Q dub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 02:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/27/online-realtors-win-rights-to-housing-database/#comment-2332236</guid>
		<description>You can start with punishing sellers who squelch comments by putting a big sticker:

"THE SELLER HAS REQUESTED THE REMOVAL OF 2 COMMENTS FROM THIS THREAD"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can start with punishing sellers who squelch comments by putting a big sticker:</p>
<p>&#8220;THE SELLER HAS REQUESTED THE REMOVAL OF 2 COMMENTS FROM THIS THREAD&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.122 seconds -->
