<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blame FriendFeed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/24/blame-friendfeed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/24/blame-friendfeed/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: It&#8217;s about Elgg today &#124; Running in parallel</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/24/blame-friendfeed/#comment-2537199</link>
		<dc:creator>It&#8217;s about Elgg today &#124; Running in parallel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 20:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/24/blame-friendfeed/#comment-2537199</guid>
		<description>[...] am finding the whole FriendFeed / Twitter slaying debate boring – who really cares. Twitter is growing in leaps and bounds and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] am finding the whole FriendFeed / Twitter slaying debate boring – who really cares. Twitter is growing in leaps and bounds and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Scoble and Scott Bourne have a quick discussion about Web 2.0! &#124; Josh Chandler's Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/24/blame-friendfeed/#comment-2507090</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Scoble and Scott Bourne have a quick discussion about Web 2.0! &#124; Josh Chandler's Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 21:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/24/blame-friendfeed/#comment-2507090</guid>
		<description>[...] Bourne and Robert Scoble to reconcile their differences over recent comments made from Bourne about Scoble&#8217;s involvement with Friendfeed and whether he was getting paid for the continous mentions on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bourne and Robert Scoble to reconcile their differences over recent comments made from Bourne about Scoble&#8217;s involvement with Friendfeed and whether he was getting paid for the continous mentions on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WinExtra - WARNING! WARNING! Gillmor off his meds</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/24/blame-friendfeed/#comment-2459115</link>
		<dc:creator>WinExtra - WARNING! WARNING! Gillmor off his meds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 07:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/24/blame-friendfeed/#comment-2459115</guid>
		<description>[...] coming from out in left field but never have a I seen one so unexplainably whacked out as Steve Gillmor&#8217;s post over on TechCrunch where he appears to be blaming Twitter&#8217;s problems right at the feet of FriendFeed. I say [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] coming from out in left field but never have a I seen one so unexplainably whacked out as Steve Gillmor&#8217;s post over on TechCrunch where he appears to be blaming Twitter&#8217;s problems right at the feet of FriendFeed. I say [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internet Marketing &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Talking Back to Your Customers &#8212; The Web 2.0 Way</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/24/blame-friendfeed/#comment-2399668</link>
		<dc:creator>Internet Marketing &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Talking Back to Your Customers &#8212; The Web 2.0 Way</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 08:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/24/blame-friendfeed/#comment-2399668</guid>
		<description>[...] has been getting a ton of complaints lately that stemmed from them having downtime and not adequately reporting the issues or keeping [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has been getting a ton of complaints lately that stemmed from them having downtime and not adequately reporting the issues or keeping [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Click2Map&#8482; Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; SMBs&#8217; Confusion with Online Social Promotion Tools</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/24/blame-friendfeed/#comment-2398733</link>
		<dc:creator>The Click2Map&#8482; Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; SMBs&#8217; Confusion with Online Social Promotion Tools</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 20:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/24/blame-friendfeed/#comment-2398733</guid>
		<description>[...] Scoble gaming the system by being omnipresent on Friendfeed? Is Friendfeed gaming the system by sucking up all of Twitter&#8217;s juice? Let&#8217;s not get too excited [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Scoble gaming the system by being omnipresent on Friendfeed? Is Friendfeed gaming the system by sucking up all of Twitter&#8217;s juice? Let&#8217;s not get too excited [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekend Reader - javascript, friendfeed, google, lifehacks, web2.0 &#171; // Internet Duct Tape</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/24/blame-friendfeed/#comment-2362205</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekend Reader - javascript, friendfeed, google, lifehacks, web2.0 &#171; // Internet Duct Tape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 02:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/24/blame-friendfeed/#comment-2362205</guid>
		<description>[...] [FRIENDFEED] Blame FriendFeed, techcrunch.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [FRIENDFEED] Blame FriendFeed, techcrunch.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/24/blame-friendfeed/#comment-2331078</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 16:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/24/blame-friendfeed/#comment-2331078</guid>
		<description>I want some of that wacky tobaccy too, Steve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want some of that wacky tobaccy too, Steve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KRZ9000</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/24/blame-friendfeed/#comment-2330739</link>
		<dc:creator>KRZ9000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 14:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/24/blame-friendfeed/#comment-2330739</guid>
		<description>lol the author seems to have issues :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol the author seems to have issues <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seeb</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/24/blame-friendfeed/#comment-2330403</link>
		<dc:creator>seeb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 10:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/24/blame-friendfeed/#comment-2330403</guid>
		<description>lost me on most of that post. was all over the place</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lost me on most of that post. was all over the place</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc&#8217;s Voice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Glory to our dead soliders</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/24/blame-friendfeed/#comment-2330064</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc&#8217;s Voice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Glory to our dead soliders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 06:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/24/blame-friendfeed/#comment-2330064</guid>
		<description>[...] I don&#8217;t blame FriendFeed - I actually like it -though I don&#8217;t do it. I have real work to do - I don&#8217;t play around much. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I don&#8217;t blame FriendFeed - I actually like it -though I don&#8217;t do it. I have real work to do - I don&#8217;t play around much. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Gillmor</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/24/blame-friendfeed/#comment-2329825</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Gillmor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 03:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/24/blame-friendfeed/#comment-2329825</guid>
		<description>I'll breathe when I'm dead</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll breathe when I&#8217;m dead</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Stewart</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/24/blame-friendfeed/#comment-2329821</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 03:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/24/blame-friendfeed/#comment-2329821</guid>
		<description>Breathe, man! You crack me up, but breathe!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Breathe, man! You crack me up, but breathe!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miles Long</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/24/blame-friendfeed/#comment-2329052</link>
		<dc:creator>Miles Long</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 20:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/24/blame-friendfeed/#comment-2329052</guid>
		<description>Made no sense at all. Sloppy writing.

Not to digress but man does Seesmic ever suck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Made no sense at all. Sloppy writing.</p>
<p>Not to digress but man does Seesmic ever suck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Church</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/24/blame-friendfeed/#comment-2328236</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Church</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 13:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/24/blame-friendfeed/#comment-2328236</guid>
		<description>I will admit, the only reason Steve's posts make sense to me is because I listen to the Gillmor Gang.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will admit, the only reason Steve&#8217;s posts make sense to me is because I listen to the Gillmor Gang.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clayton</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/24/blame-friendfeed/#comment-2327155</link>
		<dc:creator>Clayton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 04:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/24/blame-friendfeed/#comment-2327155</guid>
		<description>I'm not a fan of "that sucked" comments, they're transparently self-aggrandizing (ooo, thousands of people will see I thought that sucked!).  But really this post made no sense to me, I have to admit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a fan of &#8220;that sucked&#8221; comments, they&#8217;re transparently self-aggrandizing (ooo, thousands of people will see I thought that sucked!).  But really this post made no sense to me, I have to admit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Levine</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/24/blame-friendfeed/#comment-2326556</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Levine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 01:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/24/blame-friendfeed/#comment-2326556</guid>
		<description>As a relative newcomer to this conversation, I must say that the passions are running a bit high for the stakes here in the comments...

I thought this was an interesting piece. It cuts to the heart of open-source project development: services build up in a co-dependent fashion, and if we are judging winners and losers in dollars and cents this has the potential to create tensions if not downright problems.

IMHO, FriendFeed is a step in the right direction but ultimately something more like Flock or Facebook w/twitter integration will dominate because they have more mainstream appeal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a relative newcomer to this conversation, I must say that the passions are running a bit high for the stakes here in the comments&#8230;</p>
<p>I thought this was an interesting piece. It cuts to the heart of open-source project development: services build up in a co-dependent fashion, and if we are judging winners and losers in dollars and cents this has the potential to create tensions if not downright problems.</p>
<p>IMHO, FriendFeed is a step in the right direction but ultimately something more like Flock or Facebook w/twitter integration will dominate because they have more mainstream appeal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Gillmor</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/24/blame-friendfeed/#comment-2326507</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Gillmor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 00:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/24/blame-friendfeed/#comment-2326507</guid>
		<description>OMG I was amazed to see which comment Gabe was referring to. Gabe - you are the winner of this year's Idiot Wind Award. And what, pray tell, are you doing with your time?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG I was amazed to see which comment Gabe was referring to. Gabe - you are the winner of this year&#8217;s Idiot Wind Award. And what, pray tell, are you doing with your time?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cameron</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/24/blame-friendfeed/#comment-2326443</link>
		<dc:creator>Cameron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 23:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/24/blame-friendfeed/#comment-2326443</guid>
		<description>rofl, I'm going to save Gabe's bitchslap, for later use against trolls. There should be a Pulitzer for troll flaming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rofl, I&#8217;m going to save Gabe&#8217;s bitchslap, for later use against trolls. There should be a Pulitzer for troll flaming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/24/blame-friendfeed/#comment-2326349</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 22:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/24/blame-friendfeed/#comment-2326349</guid>
		<description>@34 Your own understanding of plain English is tenuous at best.   Idiocy and ignorance are not the same thing.

Gillmor makes a valid (albeit trite) point, but he does so in a way that could only be entertaining to a small set of tech news uber-dorks to whom Twitter is tantamount to having a life.  Very few people, even among the geeky, are interested in descending to this level of minutiae over what is essentially just a fad in the echo-chamber.

I'm glad your mastery of the subject matter can give your self-esteem a little temporary boost, but most people have better things to do with their lives.  Your insecurity and vitriol are irritating and really rather sad.  You are the one who should keep your mouth shut.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@34 Your own understanding of plain English is tenuous at best.   Idiocy and ignorance are not the same thing.</p>
<p>Gillmor makes a valid (albeit trite) point, but he does so in a way that could only be entertaining to a small set of tech news uber-dorks to whom Twitter is tantamount to having a life.  Very few people, even among the geeky, are interested in descending to this level of minutiae over what is essentially just a fad in the echo-chamber.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad your mastery of the subject matter can give your self-esteem a little temporary boost, but most people have better things to do with their lives.  Your insecurity and vitriol are irritating and really rather sad.  You are the one who should keep your mouth shut.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2008-05-25 &#171; 個人的な雑記</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/24/blame-friendfeed/#comment-2326330</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2008-05-25 &#171; 個人的な雑記</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 22:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/24/blame-friendfeed/#comment-2326330</guid>
		<description>[...] Blame FriendFeed (tags: friendfeed) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Blame FriendFeed (tags: friendfeed) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Berg</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/24/blame-friendfeed/#comment-2326296</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Berg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 22:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/24/blame-friendfeed/#comment-2326296</guid>
		<description>Why don't all of you get "TWITTER" tattooed on your penis so that when you masturbate you'll be jerking off to Twitter?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why don&#8217;t all of you get &#8220;TWITTER&#8221; tattooed on your penis so that when you masturbate you&#8217;ll be jerking off to Twitter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martin</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/24/blame-friendfeed/#comment-2326085</link>
		<dc:creator>martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 20:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/24/blame-friendfeed/#comment-2326085</guid>
		<description>well, if Web 2.0 is a party (and TechCrunch seemed to prove this from the start) -- this is one of the most enjoyable party conversations i've read. thank you, Steve, for starting this. so much intellectual fun. and basically you seem to be right too (although i don't get the techie stuff).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, if Web 2.0 is a party (and TechCrunch seemed to prove this from the start) &#8212; this is one of the most enjoyable party conversations i&#8217;ve read. thank you, Steve, for starting this. so much intellectual fun. and basically you seem to be right too (although i don&#8217;t get the techie stuff).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/24/blame-friendfeed/#comment-2326082</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 20:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/24/blame-friendfeed/#comment-2326082</guid>
		<description>This piece is anti-journalism. It is written in a way that if you understand the topic, it makes perfect sense and the cultural references are amusing. If you do not understand  what Steve is talking about, you are lost.

I do not claim to be an expert, however I think the underlying problem is APIs that present themselves as push, but are implemented as pull. If you have a pull API and want it to look like push, you have to poll. If you want to be up to the minute you have to poll frequently which can kill the server you are polling.

This problem goes back to RSS, however RSS has a mechanism for saying how often you can poll and be polite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This piece is anti-journalism. It is written in a way that if you understand the topic, it makes perfect sense and the cultural references are amusing. If you do not understand  what Steve is talking about, you are lost.</p>
<p>I do not claim to be an expert, however I think the underlying problem is APIs that present themselves as push, but are implemented as pull. If you have a pull API and want it to look like push, you have to poll. If you want to be up to the minute you have to poll frequently which can kill the server you are polling.</p>
<p>This problem goes back to RSS, however RSS has a mechanism for saying how often you can poll and be polite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin gao</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/24/blame-friendfeed/#comment-2326051</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin gao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 19:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/24/blame-friendfeed/#comment-2326051</guid>
		<description>i'm sorry - but this is not helping you guys move at all to the broad, non-techie audience that is so highly sought after. i appreciate your effort, steve, and with some research and rereading i'd understand most of it...but that's not what i'm here to do. i'm here to learn technology + current events, and it's hard to do both with what you're writing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m sorry - but this is not helping you guys move at all to the broad, non-techie audience that is so highly sought after. i appreciate your effort, steve, and with some research and rereading i&#8217;d understand most of it&#8230;but that&#8217;s not what i&#8217;m here to do. i&#8217;m here to learn technology + current events, and it&#8217;s hard to do both with what you&#8217;re writing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Savoy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/24/blame-friendfeed/#comment-2325992</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Savoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 19:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/24/blame-friendfeed/#comment-2325992</guid>
		<description>The comments to this post have run from one polar-opposite end of the
emotional, web-philosophy spectrum to the other and it seems that whatever
rectitude 'Blame Friendfeed' merits will remain a hotly-contested issue. 

Nevertheless, kudos to you for having the testicular fortitude to take on the esteemed coterie of digital luminaries in the take-no-prisoners manner in 
which you did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The comments to this post have run from one polar-opposite end of the<br />
emotional, web-philosophy spectrum to the other and it seems that whatever<br />
rectitude &#8216;Blame Friendfeed&#8217; merits will remain a hotly-contested issue. </p>
<p>Nevertheless, kudos to you for having the testicular fortitude to take on the esteemed coterie of digital luminaries in the take-no-prisoners manner in<br />
which you did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.093 seconds -->
