<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bill&#8217;s Gold Watch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/18/bills-gold-watch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/18/bills-gold-watch/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 23:13:35 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kathiravan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/18/bills-gold-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-2475268</link>
		<dc:creator>kathiravan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 16:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/18/bills-gold-watch/#comment-2475268</guid>
		<description>he is not tired  because his achievements would not make him  never tired...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>he is not tired  because his achievements would not make him  never tired&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kathiravan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/18/bills-gold-watch/comment-page-3/#comment-2475242</link>
		<dc:creator>kathiravan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 16:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/18/bills-gold-watch/#comment-2475242</guid>
		<description>why this article is named gold watch? &quot;GOLDEN INFORMATION&quot; would be the best title for this....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why this article is named gold watch? &#8220;GOLDEN INFORMATION&#8221; would be the best title for this&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/18/bills-gold-watch/comment-page-3/#comment-2353584</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 19:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/18/bills-gold-watch/#comment-2353584</guid>
		<description>I read similar article also named 217;s Gold Watch, and it was completely different. Personally, I agree with you more, because this article makes a little bit more sense for me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read similar article also named 217;s Gold Watch, and it was completely different. Personally, I agree with you more, because this article makes a little bit more sense for me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ixnlyv gdecaxn</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/18/bills-gold-watch/comment-page-3/#comment-2341617</link>
		<dc:creator>ixnlyv gdecaxn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 21:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/18/bills-gold-watch/#comment-2341617</guid>
		<description>cuiqkb yahckon ftixw hpwi fcqdoie bapmjqr fbkwziohn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cuiqkb yahckon ftixw hpwi fcqdoie bapmjqr fbkwziohn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pnuqfdrz cxzbr</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/18/bills-gold-watch/comment-page-2/#comment-2341609</link>
		<dc:creator>pnuqfdrz cxzbr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 21:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/18/bills-gold-watch/#comment-2341609</guid>
		<description>svqga wyfkxzc pkvwaxitg tnyfjwlk vbimtwher hwytz rkgcqm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>svqga wyfkxzc pkvwaxitg tnyfjwlk vbimtwher hwytz rkgcqm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/18/bills-gold-watch/comment-page-2/#comment-2335681</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 11:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/18/bills-gold-watch/#comment-2335681</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/18/bills-gold-watch/comment-page-2/#comment-2310582</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 02:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/18/bills-gold-watch/#comment-2310582</guid>
		<description>I was attempting to read this article, but I couldn&#039;t even figure out what the point of it was.  I felt even stupider when I realized there were almost 100 comments on this... fortunately for my self-esteem, the comments are because no one else can make sense of it either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was attempting to read this article, but I couldn&#8217;t even figure out what the point of it was.  I felt even stupider when I realized there were almost 100 comments on this&#8230; fortunately for my self-esteem, the comments are because no one else can make sense of it either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Clean</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/18/bills-gold-watch/comment-page-2/#comment-2309865</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Clean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 20:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/18/bills-gold-watch/#comment-2309865</guid>
		<description>Bill and MS have made some mistakes along the way. Who hasn&#039;t? The good he is doing giving his wealth away to the needy infinitely surpasses all the IT mistakes he has ever made. At least, he is one who has gotten the message of sharing. Not too sure about the rest! Long live Bill!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill and MS have made some mistakes along the way. Who hasn&#8217;t? The good he is doing giving his wealth away to the needy infinitely surpasses all the IT mistakes he has ever made. At least, he is one who has gotten the message of sharing. Not too sure about the rest! Long live Bill!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thanks Steve!</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/18/bills-gold-watch/comment-page-2/#comment-2309789</link>
		<dc:creator>Thanks Steve!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 19:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/18/bills-gold-watch/#comment-2309789</guid>
		<description>@ 90.  

Actually, it makes perfect sense.  Per above - you just need a lot of background knowledge.  

Social networks of the future will be largely based around affinity groups.  

A container is a basic (or advanced) social network framework that can run Google Open Social apps.  

Silverlight will allow such containers to run on mobile phones as well as the web.  

Skinning, will allow data originating from multiple sources (such as Facebook, Xing etc), to be packaged and viewed in a consistent way in a on a social app - running on your phone, for example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ 90.  </p>
<p>Actually, it makes perfect sense.  Per above &#8211; you just need a lot of background knowledge.  </p>
<p>Social networks of the future will be largely based around affinity groups.  </p>
<p>A container is a basic (or advanced) social network framework that can run Google Open Social apps.  </p>
<p>Silverlight will allow such containers to run on mobile phones as well as the web.  </p>
<p>Skinning, will allow data originating from multiple sources (such as Facebook, Xing etc), to be packaged and viewed in a consistent way in a on a social app &#8211; running on your phone, for example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc&#8217;s Voice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Mid-May blogging - amidst the heat</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/18/bills-gold-watch/comment-page-2/#comment-2309762</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc&#8217;s Voice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Mid-May blogging - amidst the heat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 19:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/18/bills-gold-watch/#comment-2309762</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;ve actually wondered if Bill gates really WILL step down. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ve actually wondered if Bill gates really WILL step down. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thanks Steve!</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/18/bills-gold-watch/comment-page-2/#comment-2309749</link>
		<dc:creator>Thanks Steve!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 19:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/18/bills-gold-watch/#comment-2309749</guid>
		<description>Folks, 

Yes, this article was poorly named and hard to follow.   It would have benefited from links to the items referenced.  I used google to catch up on some items i was unfamiliar with.  

I&#039;ve followed Gillmor for years - mostly via the Gilmore Gang podcasts - and there is no doubt in my mind that Steve is a brilliant strategist - who has the ability to process large amounts of information and identify key trends.  The only problem is that when you have this skill set, it&#039;s often hard to communicate clearly and concisely to those who are aren&#039;t fully informed - or who have a different way of interpreting information.  

The first problem for people that think on this level - is that to them, many  things are obvious - and it&#039;s hard to know what&#039;s not obvious to the general punter.  It takes a lot of background knowledge to digest information at this level.  

At the end of the day, Steve&#039;s insights are generally highly valuable for those in a position to benefit from them: Strategists, futurists, VC&#039;s and those of us that care about a future where our interests are front and center.  

Perhaps this is too valuable to be given away for free here at TC - especially given the time pressure to react quickly.  There is a reason that analyst reports cost thousands - and it&#039;s because filling in the gaps (with data, graphs and clarity of articulation) takes a lot of time and effort.  

Perhaps Mike can:

1) Label high level industry strategy posts, such that they are easily distinguishable - and so that those of us who are only interested in these posts, can subscribe to them separately.  

2) Find an editor who is also fully across industry dynamics to help make Steve&#039;s insights easier to interpret for the TechCrunch audience.  

Keep it coming Steve.  There are those of us that greatly appreciate it - in whatever format it comes.  (although you may find that the really high level stuff is better on your blog than here?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Folks, </p>
<p>Yes, this article was poorly named and hard to follow.   It would have benefited from links to the items referenced.  I used google to catch up on some items i was unfamiliar with.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve followed Gillmor for years &#8211; mostly via the Gilmore Gang podcasts &#8211; and there is no doubt in my mind that Steve is a brilliant strategist &#8211; who has the ability to process large amounts of information and identify key trends.  The only problem is that when you have this skill set, it&#8217;s often hard to communicate clearly and concisely to those who are aren&#8217;t fully informed &#8211; or who have a different way of interpreting information.  </p>
<p>The first problem for people that think on this level &#8211; is that to them, many  things are obvious &#8211; and it&#8217;s hard to know what&#8217;s not obvious to the general punter.  It takes a lot of background knowledge to digest information at this level.  </p>
<p>At the end of the day, Steve&#8217;s insights are generally highly valuable for those in a position to benefit from them: Strategists, futurists, VC&#8217;s and those of us that care about a future where our interests are front and center.  </p>
<p>Perhaps this is too valuable to be given away for free here at TC &#8211; especially given the time pressure to react quickly.  There is a reason that analyst reports cost thousands &#8211; and it&#8217;s because filling in the gaps (with data, graphs and clarity of articulation) takes a lot of time and effort.  </p>
<p>Perhaps Mike can:</p>
<p>1) Label high level industry strategy posts, such that they are easily distinguishable &#8211; and so that those of us who are only interested in these posts, can subscribe to them separately.  </p>
<p>2) Find an editor who is also fully across industry dynamics to help make Steve&#8217;s insights easier to interpret for the TechCrunch audience.  </p>
<p>Keep it coming Steve.  There are those of us that greatly appreciate it &#8211; in whatever format it comes.  (although you may find that the really high level stuff is better on your blog than here?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TC proofreder</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/18/bills-gold-watch/comment-page-2/#comment-2309717</link>
		<dc:creator>TC proofreder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 19:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/18/bills-gold-watch/#comment-2309717</guid>
		<description>This would be a great piece of writing if it was separated into 4-6 different posts with descriptions and detailed arguments for each topic. The current post is like a tech writer on speed - trying to say 200 things without taking a breath.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This would be a great piece of writing if it was separated into 4-6 different posts with descriptions and detailed arguments for each topic. The current post is like a tech writer on speed &#8211; trying to say 200 things without taking a breath.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/18/bills-gold-watch/comment-page-2/#comment-2309682</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 18:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/18/bills-gold-watch/#comment-2309682</guid>
		<description>&quot;feeding downstream vertical versions of affinity groups to skinned Silverlight containers&quot; is perhaps the most bullshit-ridden sentence I&#039;ve ever read.  

steve gillmor = duncan riley + dictionary.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;feeding downstream vertical versions of affinity groups to skinned Silverlight containers&#8221; is perhaps the most bullshit-ridden sentence I&#8217;ve ever read.  </p>
<p>steve gillmor = duncan riley + dictionary.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/18/bills-gold-watch/comment-page-2/#comment-2309679</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 18:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/18/bills-gold-watch/#comment-2309679</guid>
		<description>&quot;feeding downstream vertical versions of affinity groups to skinned Silverlight containers&quot; is perhaps the most bullshit-ridden sentence I&#039;ve ever read.  

steve gillmor = duncan riley + dictionary.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;feeding downstream vertical versions of affinity groups to skinned Silverlight containers&#8221; is perhaps the most bullshit-ridden sentence I&#8217;ve ever read.  </p>
<p>steve gillmor = duncan riley + dictionary.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynx</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/18/bills-gold-watch/comment-page-2/#comment-2309658</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 18:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/18/bills-gold-watch/#comment-2309658</guid>
		<description>Is it bad that i&#039;m looking forward to steves next post?

Please let there be one - maybe even allow him to have the first say on the Microsoft/Yahoo deal when it finnally happens.  Que 4 thousand comments of utter rage....if theres a god, it will happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it bad that i&#8217;m looking forward to steves next post?</p>
<p>Please let there be one &#8211; maybe even allow him to have the first say on the Microsoft/Yahoo deal when it finnally happens.  Que 4 thousand comments of utter rage&#8230;.if theres a god, it will happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/18/bills-gold-watch/comment-page-2/#comment-2309537</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 17:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/18/bills-gold-watch/#comment-2309537</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going to pile on to the rest of the comments here. These stories are extremely difficult to comprehend. Sorry, Mr. Gillmor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to pile on to the rest of the comments here. These stories are extremely difficult to comprehend. Sorry, Mr. Gillmor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EH</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/18/bills-gold-watch/comment-page-2/#comment-2309421</link>
		<dc:creator>EH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 17:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/18/bills-gold-watch/#comment-2309421</guid>
		<description>Rod@86: Check his reply at #79. Apparently it &lt;i&gt;was&lt;/i&gt; copy edited! Crap is crap, and that things can always be worse does not elevate crap to gold. It&#039;s like saying, &quot;imagine the policies that &lt;i&gt;weren&#039;t&lt;/i&gt; approved by Dick Cheney.&quot;

Then again, maybe &quot;edited&quot; in this context refers to someone hitting the &quot;approve&quot; button for the post. Steve is not exactly known for clarity and concision, so we continue to wallow in the ambiguity of his use of language.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="mailto:Rod@86:">Rod@86:</a> Check his reply at #79. Apparently it <i>was</i> copy edited! Crap is crap, and that things can always be worse does not elevate crap to gold. It&#8217;s like saying, &#8220;imagine the policies that <i>weren&#8217;t</i> approved by Dick Cheney.&#8221;</p>
<p>Then again, maybe &#8220;edited&#8221; in this context refers to someone hitting the &#8220;approve&#8221; button for the post. Steve is not exactly known for clarity and concision, so we continue to wallow in the ambiguity of his use of language.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/18/bills-gold-watch/comment-page-2/#comment-2308923</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 14:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/18/bills-gold-watch/#comment-2308923</guid>
		<description>Please, stop with this or at least have someone edit it. I don&#039;t read this fine blog each day to make my head hurt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please, stop with this or at least have someone edit it. I don&#8217;t read this fine blog each day to make my head hurt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boris</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/18/bills-gold-watch/comment-page-2/#comment-2308699</link>
		<dc:creator>Boris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 12:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/18/bills-gold-watch/#comment-2308699</guid>
		<description>Steve,

You&#039;ll be fine. Duncan got the crap beat out of him in some of the comments but most of us warmed up to him anyway. 

Remember that you&#039;ve got the knowledge (and thats important). Shorten up your posts and you should be good. More knowledge into smaller post.

Think about it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll be fine. Duncan got the crap beat out of him in some of the comments but most of us warmed up to him anyway. </p>
<p>Remember that you&#8217;ve got the knowledge (and thats important). Shorten up your posts and you should be good. More knowledge into smaller post.</p>
<p>Think about it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/18/bills-gold-watch/comment-page-2/#comment-2308209</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 08:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/18/bills-gold-watch/#comment-2308209</guid>
		<description>Unbelievable!
What total useless drivel. And what about the comments? No, I&#039;m not talking about the 80-something from the Readers, I&#039;m talking about Steve&#039;s comments to the comments... It&#039;s like a child! &quot;I won&#039;t listen to you if you don&#039;t tell me your real name! [fingers in ears] BLABLABLA...&quot;

I&#039;m not a native English speaker, meaning English is only my second language. That being said, I consider myself fairly good at both reading, writing as well as speaking English, especially when it comes to techno-lingo after spending 15 years in a profession filled with English terminology and white-papers and manuals... But this... 
I found myself thinking after the second piece &quot;What the .... is he talking about? I don&#039;t understand what the point is with this... what&#039;s the message???&quot; And then I quickly scrolled down to the comments and realized I wasn&#039;t alone...
I think TC-management should think long and hard about who their customers/readers are and what kind of style/form best suits their customers. Maybe Mike feels that he only addresses Americans with TC and that he therefor can allow this kind of stylistic mambo-jambo to the content. If that is the case, I think he should consider that the Europeans, the Chinese, the Indians and the rest of the world&#039;s techno-workers wastly outnumber the Americans... This piece of masterwork is not good nor easy reading, regardless of your level of understanding when it comes to the English language!

I&#039;m not saying Mike should take Steve off the team or anything here, that decision is of course totally up to Mike and Mike alone, but... I have been an employer and if Steve was one of my employees, I&#039;d give him a real bashing for forgetting the number one rule of business: The customer is always right!
If Steve thinks some comments are out of line or simply rude or attacking his persona or whatever, just leave it, don&#039;t add fuel to the fire. By calling the customers names and acting like a big jerk he is just alienating the readers, the customers, from the blog. It&#039;s laughable...

Lastly, a big LOL at comment #79 by Steve... My God! 
To say that a bad piece of text was even worse before, that&#039;s not a good excuse, it&#039;s not even humor...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unbelievable!<br />
What total useless drivel. And what about the comments? No, I&#8217;m not talking about the 80-something from the Readers, I&#8217;m talking about Steve&#8217;s comments to the comments&#8230; It&#8217;s like a child! &#8220;I won&#8217;t listen to you if you don&#8217;t tell me your real name! [fingers in ears] BLABLABLA&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not a native English speaker, meaning English is only my second language. That being said, I consider myself fairly good at both reading, writing as well as speaking English, especially when it comes to techno-lingo after spending 15 years in a profession filled with English terminology and white-papers and manuals&#8230; But this&#8230;<br />
I found myself thinking after the second piece &#8220;What the &#8230;. is he talking about? I don&#8217;t understand what the point is with this&#8230; what&#8217;s the message???&#8221; And then I quickly scrolled down to the comments and realized I wasn&#8217;t alone&#8230;<br />
I think TC-management should think long and hard about who their customers/readers are and what kind of style/form best suits their customers. Maybe Mike feels that he only addresses Americans with TC and that he therefor can allow this kind of stylistic mambo-jambo to the content. If that is the case, I think he should consider that the Europeans, the Chinese, the Indians and the rest of the world&#8217;s techno-workers wastly outnumber the Americans&#8230; This piece of masterwork is not good nor easy reading, regardless of your level of understanding when it comes to the English language!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying Mike should take Steve off the team or anything here, that decision is of course totally up to Mike and Mike alone, but&#8230; I have been an employer and if Steve was one of my employees, I&#8217;d give him a real bashing for forgetting the number one rule of business: The customer is always right!<br />
If Steve thinks some comments are out of line or simply rude or attacking his persona or whatever, just leave it, don&#8217;t add fuel to the fire. By calling the customers names and acting like a big jerk he is just alienating the readers, the customers, from the blog. It&#8217;s laughable&#8230;</p>
<p>Lastly, a big LOL at comment #79 by Steve&#8230; My God!<br />
To say that a bad piece of text was even worse before, that&#8217;s not a good excuse, it&#8217;s not even humor&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/18/bills-gold-watch/comment-page-2/#comment-2307819</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 03:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/18/bills-gold-watch/#comment-2307819</guid>
		<description>This article is meaningless and useless drivel.  I&#039;d really like to hear from MA what he thinks of that blog post.  I wish I could have a setting to filter him out. 

Maybe techcrunch is just punking us?

Maybe Steve is paying to be able to write?

I&#039;ll donate 5 bucks to his severance pay...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is meaningless and useless drivel.  I&#8217;d really like to hear from MA what he thinks of that blog post.  I wish I could have a setting to filter him out. </p>
<p>Maybe techcrunch is just punking us?</p>
<p>Maybe Steve is paying to be able to write?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll donate 5 bucks to his severance pay&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vinnie Tobiaz</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/18/bills-gold-watch/comment-page-2/#comment-2307796</link>
		<dc:creator>Vinnie Tobiaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 03:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/18/bills-gold-watch/#comment-2307796</guid>
		<description>Steve,

Just wanted to let you know I&#039;m taking an English Composition class currently in college and the first assignment was to find an example of plagiarism online or find an article with incorrect grammar. I pulled up TechCrunch and skipped right to this post. So many run-on sentences</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,</p>
<p>Just wanted to let you know I&#8217;m taking an English Composition class currently in college and the first assignment was to find an example of plagiarism online or find an article with incorrect grammar. I pulled up TechCrunch and skipped right to this post. So many run-on sentences</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alberto</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/18/bills-gold-watch/comment-page-2/#comment-2307792</link>
		<dc:creator>Alberto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 03:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/18/bills-gold-watch/#comment-2307792</guid>
		<description>Steve,

Is there a RSS feed for your posts only? They are getting lost in the middle of the other bleh TC&#039;s entries. Or just tinyurl your posts on Twitter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,</p>
<p>Is there a RSS feed for your posts only? They are getting lost in the middle of the other bleh TC&#8217;s entries. Or just tinyurl your posts on Twitter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LiquidSilver</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/18/bills-gold-watch/comment-page-2/#comment-2307774</link>
		<dc:creator>LiquidSilver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 02:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/18/bills-gold-watch/#comment-2307774</guid>
		<description>I actually would like to see Michael Arrington leave an objective comment about this article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually would like to see Michael Arrington leave an objective comment about this article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Gillmor</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/18/bills-gold-watch/comment-page-2/#comment-2307741</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Gillmor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 02:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/18/bills-gold-watch/#comment-2307741</guid>
		<description>Eric

You should have seen the version before it was edited.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric</p>
<p>You should have seen the version before it was edited.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
