<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rumor: Google To Launch Hosted Site Search, Ditch Mini</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/15/rumor-google-to-launch-hosted-site-search-ditch-mini/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/15/rumor-google-to-launch-hosted-site-search-ditch-mini/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 11:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Google shows off its bench &#124; Computer Technology and Others</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/15/rumor-google-to-launch-hosted-site-search-ditch-mini/#comment-2417689</link>
		<dc:creator>Google shows off its bench &#124; Computer Technology and Others</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 20:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/15/rumor-google-to-launch-hosted-site-search-ditch-mini/#comment-2417689</guid>
		<description>[...] another word, find. Maybe its cloud will bring a third word, host, but so far it is mainly a set of services built around that one word, search, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] another word, find. Maybe its cloud will bring a third word, host, but so far it is mainly a set of services built around that one word, search, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Open Source mobile edition</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/15/rumor-google-to-launch-hosted-site-search-ditch-mini/#comment-2416176</link>
		<dc:creator>Open Source mobile edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/15/rumor-google-to-launch-hosted-site-search-ditch-mini/#comment-2416176</guid>
		<description>[...] another word, find. Maybe its cloud will bring a third word, host, but so far it is mainly a set of services built around that one word, search, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] another word, find. Maybe its cloud will bring a third word, host, but so far it is mainly a set of services built around that one word, search, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Launches Hosted Site Search; Not Ditching Mini After All</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/15/rumor-google-to-launch-hosted-site-search-ditch-mini/#comment-2344875</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Launches Hosted Site Search; Not Ditching Mini After All</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 04:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/15/rumor-google-to-launch-hosted-site-search-ditch-mini/#comment-2344875</guid>
		<description>[...] couple weeks ago we reported a rumor that Google was going to replace its Mini search appliance with a new hosted solution for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] couple weeks ago we reported a rumor that Google was going to replace its Mini search appliance with a new hosted solution for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/15/rumor-google-to-launch-hosted-site-search-ditch-mini/#comment-2331353</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 18:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/15/rumor-google-to-launch-hosted-site-search-ditch-mini/#comment-2331353</guid>
		<description>Google today announced 3 huge new features for the Mini as well as 6 new languages. Doesn't seem like they are about to kill it.

http://googleenterprise.blogspot.com/2008/05/google-mini-gets-not-so-mini-upgrade.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google today announced 3 huge new features for the Mini as well as 6 new languages. Doesn&#8217;t seem like they are about to kill it.</p>
<p><a href="http://googleenterprise.blogspot.com/2008/05/google-mini-gets-not-so-mini-upgrade.html" rel="nofollow">http://googleenterprise.blogsp.....grade.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Cizmar</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/15/rumor-google-to-launch-hosted-site-search-ditch-mini/#comment-2328655</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Cizmar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 16:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/15/rumor-google-to-launch-hosted-site-search-ditch-mini/#comment-2328655</guid>
		<description>It's difficult to understand something that is yet not published (as we all remember from the Google Phone).  With Microsoft and Coveo agressively pushing into this market, it would not be wise for Google to back out of the Google Mini as it provides an entry solution to organizations at an incredible price point.  This can not be replaced by a hosted solution.

The Google Mini  was created specifically to address the issue of how can an organization have Google Search across its internal content.  "...allow businesses to search their websites and other data stores in the cloud." simply does not address that.

What you'll probably see is an enhanced Custom Search Edition that will allow organizations to search through their Google Apps Data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s difficult to understand something that is yet not published (as we all remember from the Google Phone).  With Microsoft and Coveo agressively pushing into this market, it would not be wise for Google to back out of the Google Mini as it provides an entry solution to organizations at an incredible price point.  This can not be replaced by a hosted solution.</p>
<p>The Google Mini  was created specifically to address the issue of how can an organization have Google Search across its internal content.  &#8220;&#8230;allow businesses to search their websites and other data stores in the cloud.&#8221; simply does not address that.</p>
<p>What you&#8217;ll probably see is an enhanced Custom Search Edition that will allow organizations to search through their Google Apps Data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tss</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/15/rumor-google-to-launch-hosted-site-search-ditch-mini/#comment-2311623</link>
		<dc:creator>tss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 10:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/15/rumor-google-to-launch-hosted-site-search-ditch-mini/#comment-2311623</guid>
		<description>With several search vendors moving to the cloud, the future of search is definitely within the cloud for websites.

Check this out - http://developer.amazonwebservices.com/connect/thread.jspa?messageID=89123&#38;#89123</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With several search vendors moving to the cloud, the future of search is definitely within the cloud for websites.</p>
<p>Check this out - <a href="http://developer.amazonwebservices.com/connect/thread.jspa?messageID=89123&amp;#89123" rel="nofollow">http://developer.amazonwebserv.....amp;#89123</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Wong</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/15/rumor-google-to-launch-hosted-site-search-ditch-mini/#comment-2307891</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Wong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 04:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/15/rumor-google-to-launch-hosted-site-search-ditch-mini/#comment-2307891</guid>
		<description>Tom is quite right, as Google's culture has not yet fitted into the cultures of cooperations where security and regulations rule. Though in theory Google might change the factors of page ranks for cooperations, however, culture conflict is the major obstacle. In addition, regulations in different countries might require confidential info not to be off-premise for whatever reasons. Google really needs to find some marketing people from Microsoft to help its business for enterprises.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom is quite right, as Google&#8217;s culture has not yet fitted into the cultures of cooperations where security and regulations rule. Though in theory Google might change the factors of page ranks for cooperations, however, culture conflict is the major obstacle. In addition, regulations in different countries might require confidential info not to be off-premise for whatever reasons. Google really needs to find some marketing people from Microsoft to help its business for enterprises.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Week 1 update &#171; Sift&#8217;d Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/15/rumor-google-to-launch-hosted-site-search-ditch-mini/#comment-2307188</link>
		<dc:creator>Week 1 update &#171; Sift&#8217;d Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 20:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/15/rumor-google-to-launch-hosted-site-search-ditch-mini/#comment-2307188</guid>
		<description>[...] There are a few more areas we&#8217;re looking at improving, and a few secret features we&#8217;re working out that&#8217;ll make Sift&#8217;d a valuable asset in your online experience. Searching hasn&#8217;t been implemented yet, at the moment it&#8217;s not vital and we&#8217;re hanging out to see what happens with Google launching hosted site searching. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There are a few more areas we&#8217;re looking at improving, and a few secret features we&#8217;re working out that&#8217;ll make Sift&#8217;d a valuable asset in your online experience. Searching hasn&#8217;t been implemented yet, at the moment it&#8217;s not vital and we&#8217;re hanging out to see what happens with Google launching hosted site searching. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Metcalfe</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/15/rumor-google-to-launch-hosted-site-search-ditch-mini/#comment-2301413</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Metcalfe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/15/rumor-google-to-launch-hosted-site-search-ditch-mini/#comment-2301413</guid>
		<description>To echo what NickeyD said.

I can't see any medium or large enterprise letting their documents leak outside of the firewall, esp as a fair degree of business docs are highly confidential.

A lot of the cloud based solutions are being used by small companies who are either naive of the issues or frankly don't care and feel the upside outweighs the problems.

So I can only imagine that if Google are doing a cloud-based solution that it is aimed at this end of the market (which is not even the customer base for the mini).  I wonder whether they will do a spin up of Google Doc Search - which already lets you share crawler data about your local drive to the cloud so that you can 'search your harddrive' from multiple locations</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To echo what NickeyD said.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t see any medium or large enterprise letting their documents leak outside of the firewall, esp as a fair degree of business docs are highly confidential.</p>
<p>A lot of the cloud based solutions are being used by small companies who are either naive of the issues or frankly don&#8217;t care and feel the upside outweighs the problems.</p>
<p>So I can only imagine that if Google are doing a cloud-based solution that it is aimed at this end of the market (which is not even the customer base for the mini).  I wonder whether they will do a spin up of Google Doc Search - which already lets you share crawler data about your local drive to the cloud so that you can &#8217;search your harddrive&#8217; from multiple locations</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/15/rumor-google-to-launch-hosted-site-search-ditch-mini/#comment-2301389</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 17:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/15/rumor-google-to-launch-hosted-site-search-ditch-mini/#comment-2301389</guid>
		<description>This is a no brainer for Google, about time.  I have a ton of clients who wouldn't hesitate to add this to their sites, but would be a hard sell to add the appliance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a no brainer for Google, about time.  I have a ton of clients who wouldn&#8217;t hesitate to add this to their sites, but would be a hard sell to add the appliance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Einspruch</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/15/rumor-google-to-launch-hosted-site-search-ditch-mini/#comment-2301306</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Einspruch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 17:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/15/rumor-google-to-launch-hosted-site-search-ditch-mini/#comment-2301306</guid>
		<description>Bummer. I would love to move to a cloud-based solution. Does anyone want to buy my Mini? Amazingly there seems to be no after-market for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bummer. I would love to move to a cloud-based solution. Does anyone want to buy my Mini? Amazingly there seems to be no after-market for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K Smart</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/15/rumor-google-to-launch-hosted-site-search-ditch-mini/#comment-2301292</link>
		<dc:creator>K Smart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 16:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/15/rumor-google-to-launch-hosted-site-search-ditch-mini/#comment-2301292</guid>
		<description>@ceejayoz

if u ACTUALLY READ WHAT IT CAN DO , u can give it COMPLETELY custom XML INDEXES THAT WOULD BE BLOCKED FROM ROBOTS.TXT THUS NOT IN THE INDEX BUT IN YOUR SITE SEARCH. I FEEL THE NEED TO TYPE ONLY IN CAPITAL LETTERS .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ceejayoz</p>
<p>if u ACTUALLY READ WHAT IT CAN DO , u can give it COMPLETELY custom XML INDEXES THAT WOULD BE BLOCKED FROM ROBOTS.TXT THUS NOT IN THE INDEX BUT IN YOUR SITE SEARCH. I FEEL THE NEED TO TYPE ONLY IN CAPITAL LETTERS .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ceejayoz</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/15/rumor-google-to-launch-hosted-site-search-ditch-mini/#comment-2300871</link>
		<dc:creator>ceejayoz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 12:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/15/rumor-google-to-launch-hosted-site-search-ditch-mini/#comment-2300871</guid>
		<description>@J Smart - uh, read the features.

"Custom Search uses the same index as Google.com to provide world-class relevance and speed."

That is *not* the same thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@J Smart - uh, read the features.</p>
<p>&#8220;Custom Search uses the same index as Google.com to provide world-class relevance and speed.&#8221;</p>
<p>That is *not* the same thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rumor: Google To Launch Hosted Site Search, Ditch Mini &#124; All About mobile</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/15/rumor-google-to-launch-hosted-site-search-ditch-mini/#comment-2300298</link>
		<dc:creator>Rumor: Google To Launch Hosted Site Search, Ditch Mini &#124; All About mobile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 06:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/15/rumor-google-to-launch-hosted-site-search-ditch-mini/#comment-2300298</guid>
		<description>[...] via    LET US GROW: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] via    LET US GROW: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J Smart</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/15/rumor-google-to-launch-hosted-site-search-ditch-mini/#comment-2300246</link>
		<dc:creator>J Smart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 05:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/15/rumor-google-to-launch-hosted-site-search-ditch-mini/#comment-2300246</guid>
		<description>I'm underwhelmed with all of you, especially you Michael. 
First, this isn't new news. Google already sells this product (under a ridiculous nmae, CSBE). Go to google.com/sitesearch. We use it for our site and LOVE it. As for the Mini its great. It powers the intranet and DOES have doc level security (using basic auth). Any real news on TechCrunch?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m underwhelmed with all of you, especially you Michael.<br />
First, this isn&#8217;t new news. Google already sells this product (under a ridiculous nmae, CSBE). Go to google.com/sitesearch. We use it for our site and LOVE it. As for the Mini its great. It powers the intranet and DOES have doc level security (using basic auth). Any real news on TechCrunch?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; 噂話：Googleが「Mini Search Appliance」を廃止して「Hosted Site Search」を</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/15/rumor-google-to-launch-hosted-site-search-ditch-mini/#comment-2300239</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; 噂話：Googleが「Mini Search Appliance」を廃止して「Hosted Site Search」を</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 05:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/15/rumor-google-to-launch-hosted-site-search-ditch-mini/#comment-2300239</guid>
		<description>[...] [原文へ] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [原文へ] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveS</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/15/rumor-google-to-launch-hosted-site-search-ditch-mini/#comment-2300236</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 05:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/15/rumor-google-to-launch-hosted-site-search-ditch-mini/#comment-2300236</guid>
		<description>This is just plain stupid. If they think that I would allow my internal data to leak out outside our firewall, they're insane!!! No one has a perfect security record and google's record is not perfect either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just plain stupid. If they think that I would allow my internal data to leak out outside our firewall, they&#8217;re insane!!! No one has a perfect security record and google&#8217;s record is not perfect either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NickeyD</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/15/rumor-google-to-launch-hosted-site-search-ditch-mini/#comment-2300230</link>
		<dc:creator>NickeyD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 05:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/15/rumor-google-to-launch-hosted-site-search-ditch-mini/#comment-2300230</guid>
		<description>All those internal documents and pages leaking out the firewall ?  I don't think our IT department would like that very much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All those internal documents and pages leaking out the firewall ?  I don&#8217;t think our IT department would like that very much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Hendrickson</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/15/rumor-google-to-launch-hosted-site-search-ditch-mini/#comment-2300178</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Hendrickson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 04:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/15/rumor-google-to-launch-hosted-site-search-ditch-mini/#comment-2300178</guid>
		<description>@Kevin - Large corporations may not embrace cloud computing yet but smaller ones arguably are more willing to. Hence the decision to get rid of the Mini but not the main appliance, which hospitals etc would continue to prefer. I don't see why Google would abandon the mini without replacing it unless there's simply not enough demand for the unit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kevin - Large corporations may not embrace cloud computing yet but smaller ones arguably are more willing to. Hence the decision to get rid of the Mini but not the main appliance, which hospitals etc would continue to prefer. I don&#8217;t see why Google would abandon the mini without replacing it unless there&#8217;s simply not enough demand for the unit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/15/rumor-google-to-launch-hosted-site-search-ditch-mini/#comment-2300177</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 04:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/15/rumor-google-to-launch-hosted-site-search-ditch-mini/#comment-2300177</guid>
		<description>The problem with the Mini is/was that they stripped it of document level security making it next to useless.  The only solution they offered was this…

“You can create section-level security by placing a proxy web server in front of the Google Mini and password protecting it.”

So there was no real way to filter results effectively.  The documents themselves could be password protected but they’d still appear in search results and show the first couple paragraphs.  To get anything secure you had to upgrade to the full Search Appliance which costs a whopping $30,000.  

So the Google Mini was just a bad product that Google didn’t want to support anymore (remember that Google has a pretty meager support staff since most of their business doesn’t require things like telephone support).

This certainly isn’t some victory for cloud computing it’s just Google trying to save face.  

The truth is that Enterprise search is a problem for Google in general.  My informal tests of the Google Mini (I got to evaluate it) showed that it didn’t yield much better results than the equivalent Sharepoint solution.  Google’s problem with the enterprise market is that their tricks don’t work in an environment with security and relatively low traffic.  So a salary sheet might see virtually no traffic or links (since only upper management can see it) which puts it low on the “page rank” model but it’s exactly what should be at the top of corporate search results (for those who can see it)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with the Mini is/was that they stripped it of document level security making it next to useless.  The only solution they offered was this…</p>
<p>“You can create section-level security by placing a proxy web server in front of the Google Mini and password protecting it.”</p>
<p>So there was no real way to filter results effectively.  The documents themselves could be password protected but they’d still appear in search results and show the first couple paragraphs.  To get anything secure you had to upgrade to the full Search Appliance which costs a whopping $30,000.  </p>
<p>So the Google Mini was just a bad product that Google didn’t want to support anymore (remember that Google has a pretty meager support staff since most of their business doesn’t require things like telephone support).</p>
<p>This certainly isn’t some victory for cloud computing it’s just Google trying to save face.  </p>
<p>The truth is that Enterprise search is a problem for Google in general.  My informal tests of the Google Mini (I got to evaluate it) showed that it didn’t yield much better results than the equivalent Sharepoint solution.  Google’s problem with the enterprise market is that their tricks don’t work in an environment with security and relatively low traffic.  So a salary sheet might see virtually no traffic or links (since only upper management can see it) which puts it low on the “page rank” model but it’s exactly what should be at the top of corporate search results (for those who can see it)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Latest from Google - 15 May 2008 &#124; My Blog Posts</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/15/rumor-google-to-launch-hosted-site-search-ditch-mini/#comment-2300167</link>
		<dc:creator>Latest from Google - 15 May 2008 &#124; My Blog Posts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 04:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/15/rumor-google-to-launch-hosted-site-search-ditch-mini/#comment-2300167</guid>
		<description>[...] Also see Rumor from Techcrunch [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Also see Rumor from Techcrunch [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Shannon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/15/rumor-google-to-launch-hosted-site-search-ditch-mini/#comment-2300165</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Shannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 04:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/15/rumor-google-to-launch-hosted-site-search-ditch-mini/#comment-2300165</guid>
		<description>Actually I think this is monumentally stupid.  Large corporations have not embraced cloud computing.  I work in a hospital and I can tell you there is no way the IT Management would feel comfortable having Google spider their content and store it on a Google machine.  How will the service spider content on corporate intranets behind the firewall.

I assume just the mini will die and the full Google Appliance will remain.  I think the driving force here is to kill the mini which is $3000 and push corporations to the full appliance at $30,000.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually I think this is monumentally stupid.  Large corporations have not embraced cloud computing.  I work in a hospital and I can tell you there is no way the IT Management would feel comfortable having Google spider their content and store it on a Google machine.  How will the service spider content on corporate intranets behind the firewall.</p>
<p>I assume just the mini will die and the full Google Appliance will remain.  I think the driving force here is to kill the mini which is $3000 and push corporations to the full appliance at $30,000.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Faisal</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/15/rumor-google-to-launch-hosted-site-search-ditch-mini/#comment-2300147</link>
		<dc:creator>Faisal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 03:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/15/rumor-google-to-launch-hosted-site-search-ditch-mini/#comment-2300147</guid>
		<description>I was waiting for some thing like that for years.

Better late than never!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was waiting for some thing like that for years.</p>
<p>Better late than never!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Urban</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/15/rumor-google-to-launch-hosted-site-search-ditch-mini/#comment-2300143</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Urban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 03:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/15/rumor-google-to-launch-hosted-site-search-ditch-mini/#comment-2300143</guid>
		<description>This makes total sense. In Europe people will still be apprehensive of giving their data 'away' into Google's hands, but as usual they'll realize a decade later that the world moves on and they can't do anything about it. Good move on Google's side that was kind of overdue.

Peter
do you follow me @ http://twitter.com/peterurban</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This makes total sense. In Europe people will still be apprehensive of giving their data &#8216;away&#8217; into Google&#8217;s hands, but as usual they&#8217;ll realize a decade later that the world moves on and they can&#8217;t do anything about it. Good move on Google&#8217;s side that was kind of overdue.</p>
<p>Peter<br />
do you follow me @ <a href="http://twitter.com/peterurban" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/peterurban</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Q</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/15/rumor-google-to-launch-hosted-site-search-ditch-mini/#comment-2300141</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Q</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 03:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/15/rumor-google-to-launch-hosted-site-search-ditch-mini/#comment-2300141</guid>
		<description>I'd love to see this unfold</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d love to see this unfold</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.093 seconds -->
