<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ok, Wired, Let&#8217;s Do This.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/13/ok-wired-lets-do-this/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/13/ok-wired-lets-do-this/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 21:59:13 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Minneapolis Web Design Desaraev</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/13/ok-wired-lets-do-this/comment-page-4/#comment-2551476</link>
		<dc:creator>Minneapolis Web Design Desaraev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 03:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/13/ok-wired-lets-do-this/#comment-2551476</guid>
		<description>I like TC and Wired, but professionalism.. or not stooping to someone elses low is nice. I only read half the article because I figure if you can&#039;t say anything nice.. or at least not air out your dirty laundry in public then I don&#039;t want to read it. Too much of that stuff on tv with all the celebutants, just expected more from Tech Crunch and Wired.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like TC and Wired, but professionalism.. or not stooping to someone elses low is nice. I only read half the article because I figure if you can&#8217;t say anything nice.. or at least not air out your dirty laundry in public then I don&#8217;t want to read it. Too much of that stuff on tv with all the celebutants, just expected more from Tech Crunch and Wired.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web 2.0: why I don&#8217;t blog about it much anymore. . . : Texas Startup Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/13/ok-wired-lets-do-this/comment-page-4/#comment-2317014</link>
		<dc:creator>Web 2.0: why I don&#8217;t blog about it much anymore. . . : Texas Startup Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 20:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/13/ok-wired-lets-do-this/#comment-2317014</guid>
		<description>[...] for commentary and opinion from Mike. Ironically, Wired and Mike are currently arguing about Mike&#8217;s conflicts of interest. The fact that Mike is IN the Web 2.0 game and active in the blogo/twitter/sphere is why I care [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for commentary and opinion from Mike. Ironically, Wired and Mike are currently arguing about Mike&#8217;s conflicts of interest. The fact that Mike is IN the Web 2.0 game and active in the blogo/twitter/sphere is why I care [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Web 2.0 Civil War &#171; Crastinate</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/13/ok-wired-lets-do-this/comment-page-4/#comment-2313575</link>
		<dc:creator>The Web 2.0 Civil War &#171; Crastinate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 21:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/13/ok-wired-lets-do-this/#comment-2313575</guid>
		<description>[...] Michael Arrington&#8217;s battle with Wired [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michael Arrington&#8217;s battle with Wired [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prediction markets = &#8220;the future of journalism&#8221; &#8212;said, from day one, Emile Servan-Schreiber of NewsFutures. Emile, if you have balls, let&#8217;s do it &#8212;all together. &#124; Midas Oracle .ORG</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/13/ok-wired-lets-do-this/comment-page-4/#comment-2311952</link>
		<dc:creator>Prediction markets = &#8220;the future of journalism&#8221; &#8212;said, from day one, Emile Servan-Schreiber of NewsFutures. Emile, if you have balls, let&#8217;s do it &#8212;all together. &#124; Midas Oracle .ORG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 12:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/13/ok-wired-lets-do-this/#comment-2311952</guid>
		<description>[...] If you look at the evolution of the media, you see that the old-school, dead-tree publications are slowly dying, and are replaced by professional blog networks &#8212;look especially in the IT industry, with TechCrunch, etc. What you have is writers who publish only for the Web, and who fill a vertical niche. (And, the Washington Post is now publishing content from&#8230; guess who.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If you look at the evolution of the media, you see that the old-school, dead-tree publications are slowly dying, and are replaced by professional blog networks &#8212;look especially in the IT industry, with TechCrunch, etc. What you have is writers who publish only for the Web, and who fill a vertical niche. (And, the Washington Post is now publishing content from&#8230; guess who.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Link-Fest for Friday May 15th 2008 &#124; SEOpsCentre</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/13/ok-wired-lets-do-this/comment-page-4/#comment-2301092</link>
		<dc:creator>Link-Fest for Friday May 15th 2008 &#124; SEOpsCentre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 14:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/13/ok-wired-lets-do-this/#comment-2301092</guid>
		<description>[...] mistake, but it was funny while it lasted. On the subject of TechCrunch, there seems to be a fight brewing between Michael Arrington and Betsy Schiffman of Wired following the announcement that TechCrunch is getting syndicated by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mistake, but it was funny while it lasted. On the subject of TechCrunch, there seems to be a fight brewing between Michael Arrington and Betsy Schiffman of Wired following the announcement that TechCrunch is getting syndicated by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Mike Arrington Show</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/13/ok-wired-lets-do-this/comment-page-4/#comment-2299829</link>
		<dc:creator>The Mike Arrington Show</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 00:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/13/ok-wired-lets-do-this/#comment-2299829</guid>
		<description>[...] Before you hit play, note that there is some offensive language in the video, referring to our recent dispute with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Before you hit play, note that there is some offensive language in the video, referring to our recent dispute with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2008-05-15 &#171; SYSTEMWECHSEL</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/13/ok-wired-lets-do-this/comment-page-4/#comment-2299780</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2008-05-15 &#171; SYSTEMWECHSEL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 23:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/13/ok-wired-lets-do-this/#comment-2299780</guid>
		<description>[...] Ok, Wired, Let’s Do This. TechCrunch vs. Wired, könnte lustig werden wenn zwei Top-US-Blogs Beef miteinander haben. (tags: Medien) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ok, Wired, Let’s Do This. TechCrunch vs. Wired, könnte lustig werden wenn zwei Top-US-Blogs Beef miteinander haben. (tags: Medien) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wired vs. Michael Arrington</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/13/ok-wired-lets-do-this/comment-page-4/#comment-2299310</link>
		<dc:creator>Wired vs. Michael Arrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 18:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/13/ok-wired-lets-do-this/#comment-2299310</guid>
		<description>[...] that Michael Arrington finally wrote a formal response on TechCrunch. His main defense was the fact that he clearly discloses all his financial ties and investments, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that Michael Arrington finally wrote a formal response on TechCrunch. His main defense was the fact that he clearly discloses all his financial ties and investments, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Nobody</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/13/ok-wired-lets-do-this/comment-page-4/#comment-2298681</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Nobody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 13:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/13/ok-wired-lets-do-this/#comment-2298681</guid>
		<description>@ Charlie Prince:  I completely agree with you - but I would point out that we don&#039;t even hold politicians to that level of scrutiny (even though we should) and - imo - as long as we are aware that conflicts exist,  we may not get any better than that. 

Frankly I would rather know about a conflict when reading a story than read a story that later I find out was completley fabricated (As seems to happen in established media from time to time). Moreover I think we would be kidding ourselves to believe that this type of conflict doesn&#039;t exist in places like WP and elsewhere just because those journalists don&#039;t own the company stock. 

As far as Steve Ballmer goes we could probably walk away from his reporting best informed because we understand his motivation so well. We often don&#039;t have this perspective when viewing other sources of information beit written by Apple fanboys or linux prophets or Microsoft haters etc, you see my point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Charlie Prince:  I completely agree with you &#8211; but I would point out that we don&#8217;t even hold politicians to that level of scrutiny (even though we should) and &#8211; imo &#8211; as long as we are aware that conflicts exist,  we may not get any better than that. </p>
<p>Frankly I would rather know about a conflict when reading a story than read a story that later I find out was completley fabricated (As seems to happen in established media from time to time). Moreover I think we would be kidding ourselves to believe that this type of conflict doesn&#8217;t exist in places like WP and elsewhere just because those journalists don&#8217;t own the company stock. </p>
<p>As far as Steve Ballmer goes we could probably walk away from his reporting best informed because we understand his motivation so well. We often don&#8217;t have this perspective when viewing other sources of information beit written by Apple fanboys or linux prophets or Microsoft haters etc, you see my point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hornelius</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/13/ok-wired-lets-do-this/comment-page-4/#comment-2297819</link>
		<dc:creator>hornelius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 04:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/13/ok-wired-lets-do-this/#comment-2297819</guid>
		<description>@ those terminating their Wired subscription

Good luck. You can stop payment on your subscription, but the mag will continue to arrive.  They are desperately in need of eyeballs. 

Rather than burning the mag, enter it in their return to sender contest. 
Colophon
Self referencial acronym which helped get this post out
Wired = Wired Isn&#039;t Right Ever Dude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ those terminating their Wired subscription</p>
<p>Good luck. You can stop payment on your subscription, but the mag will continue to arrive.  They are desperately in need of eyeballs. </p>
<p>Rather than burning the mag, enter it in their return to sender contest.<br />
Colophon<br />
Self referencial acronym which helped get this post out<br />
Wired = Wired Isn&#8217;t Right Ever Dude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh Sol</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/13/ok-wired-lets-do-this/comment-page-4/#comment-2297745</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh Sol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 03:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/13/ok-wired-lets-do-this/#comment-2297745</guid>
		<description>Tech Crunch: The blog with a personality

It will get all your news
It will infiltrate your views
Yes it&#039;s TCrunch!

It will stick to you like glue
It will modify memories too
Send in the TCrunch!

Disclaimer: I am addicted to TechCrunch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tech Crunch: The blog with a personality</p>
<p>It will get all your news<br />
It will infiltrate your views<br />
Yes it&#8217;s TCrunch!</p>
<p>It will stick to you like glue<br />
It will modify memories too<br />
Send in the TCrunch!</p>
<p>Disclaimer: I am addicted to TechCrunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/13/ok-wired-lets-do-this/comment-page-4/#comment-2297664</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 02:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/13/ok-wired-lets-do-this/#comment-2297664</guid>
		<description>Wow, talk about thin-skinned Mike.

And for those of you who don&#039;t read Wired anymore, why you even care speaks volumes.

And Arritards...whatever.

Jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, talk about thin-skinned Mike.</p>
<p>And for those of you who don&#8217;t read Wired anymore, why you even care speaks volumes.</p>
<p>And Arritards&#8230;whatever.</p>
<p>Jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sunkay</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/13/ok-wired-lets-do-this/comment-page-4/#comment-2297359</link>
		<dc:creator>sunkay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 00:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/13/ok-wired-lets-do-this/#comment-2297359</guid>
		<description>Well, what more can we expect from Mike Arrogant. I read the articles that are quoted too and I agree with Jackson&#039;s post above. So, now we know that Mike Arrogant cannot take criticism and resorts to obscene language. 

Oh, well. This is his low point and what about his conflicts of interest.... 

Well, Time thinks he can make or break a startup. Time also put Putin as the man of the year too.... So, what more can we expect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, what more can we expect from Mike Arrogant. I read the articles that are quoted too and I agree with Jackson&#8217;s post above. So, now we know that Mike Arrogant cannot take criticism and resorts to obscene language. </p>
<p>Oh, well. This is his low point and what about his conflicts of interest&#8230;. </p>
<p>Well, Time thinks he can make or break a startup. Time also put Putin as the man of the year too&#8230;. So, what more can we expect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/13/ok-wired-lets-do-this/comment-page-4/#comment-2297211</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 23:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/13/ok-wired-lets-do-this/#comment-2297211</guid>
		<description>Does anyone read wired anymore? I don&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone read wired anymore? I don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eddy Stevenson</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/13/ok-wired-lets-do-this/comment-page-4/#comment-2297170</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddy Stevenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 22:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/13/ok-wired-lets-do-this/#comment-2297170</guid>
		<description>well done wired!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well done wired!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hornelius</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/13/ok-wired-lets-do-this/comment-page-4/#comment-2297078</link>
		<dc:creator>hornelius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 21:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/13/ok-wired-lets-do-this/#comment-2297078</guid>
		<description>Very entertaining! The fact is, when it comes to technology, Wired never gets it right.  Wired is all about two things, profit and liberalism. 

P.S. Bruce Sterling writes and looks like a lesbian grandmother, not a dig just accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very entertaining! The fact is, when it comes to technology, Wired never gets it right.  Wired is all about two things, profit and liberalism. </p>
<p>P.S. Bruce Sterling writes and looks like a lesbian grandmother, not a dig just accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bjorn</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/13/ok-wired-lets-do-this/comment-page-4/#comment-2297066</link>
		<dc:creator>Bjorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 21:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/13/ok-wired-lets-do-this/#comment-2297066</guid>
		<description>Seems like a fake war among friends to generate pageviews.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like a fake war among friends to generate pageviews.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#124; TechCrunch, WIRED Go to War by Post Deal</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/13/ok-wired-lets-do-this/comment-page-4/#comment-2297046</link>
		<dc:creator>&#124; TechCrunch, WIRED Go to War by Post Deal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 21:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/13/ok-wired-lets-do-this/#comment-2297046</guid>
		<description>[...] blogger Michael Arrington BLASTED Wired Magazine blogger Betsy Schiffman&#8217;s SWIPE at TechCrunch&#8217;s recently announced [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] blogger Michael Arrington BLASTED Wired Magazine blogger Betsy Schiffman&#8217;s SWIPE at TechCrunch&#8217;s recently announced [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Nielubowicz</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/13/ok-wired-lets-do-this/comment-page-4/#comment-2297025</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Nielubowicz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 21:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/13/ok-wired-lets-do-this/#comment-2297025</guid>
		<description>Somebody with more free time on their hands than myself head to that CJR link I posted above and click on Advance Publications. Advance owns Conde Nast which owns Wired. It all gets a little complicated, since Wired print and Wired.com were in the hands off different owners from &#039;98 - &#039;06, but Wired.com was bound to print the mags articles despite that. 

I guarantee it&#039;ll be hard to find where Wired mentions Advance&#039;s interest / investment in properties that were subject&#039;s of articles. Discovery communicatons for instance? Time Warner cable? (owned jointly by TW &amp; Advance from &#039;95 - &#039;02) Just look at that list of Advance properties, plenty to pick from...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somebody with more free time on their hands than myself head to that CJR link I posted above and click on Advance Publications. Advance owns Conde Nast which owns Wired. It all gets a little complicated, since Wired print and Wired.com were in the hands off different owners from &#8216;98 &#8211; &#8216;06, but Wired.com was bound to print the mags articles despite that. </p>
<p>I guarantee it&#8217;ll be hard to find where Wired mentions Advance&#8217;s interest / investment in properties that were subject&#8217;s of articles. Discovery communicatons for instance? Time Warner cable? (owned jointly by TW &amp; Advance from &#8216;95 &#8211; &#8216;02) Just look at that list of Advance properties, plenty to pick from&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Nielubowicz</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/13/ok-wired-lets-do-this/comment-page-4/#comment-2296920</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Nielubowicz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 20:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/13/ok-wired-lets-do-this/#comment-2296920</guid>
		<description>Mike, here&#039;s a great link to get a look at all of the incestuous relationships in media today.  http://www.cjr.org/resources/  

How many of these outlets disclose their corporate ties to their interview subjects to the viewing / reading public? Very few...

I&#039;d pat you on the back for being so good about disclosing, but then you&#039;re just doing what everyone ought to be doing in the first place.

Jason</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, here&#8217;s a great link to get a look at all of the incestuous relationships in media today.  <a href="http://www.cjr.org/resources/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.cjr.org/resources/'>http://www.cjr.org/resources/</a>  </p>
<p>How many of these outlets disclose their corporate ties to their interview subjects to the viewing / reading public? Very few&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;d pat you on the back for being so good about disclosing, but then you&#8217;re just doing what everyone ought to be doing in the first place.</p>
<p>Jason</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch, WIRED Go to War by Post Deal &#124; Gizmos and Gadgets</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/13/ok-wired-lets-do-this/comment-page-4/#comment-2296904</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch, WIRED Go to War by Post Deal &#124; Gizmos and Gadgets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 20:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/13/ok-wired-lets-do-this/#comment-2296904</guid>
		<description>[...] blogger Michael Arrington BLASTED Wired Magazine blogger Betsy Schiffman&#8217;s SWIPE at TechCrunch&#8217;s recently announced [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] blogger Michael Arrington BLASTED Wired Magazine blogger Betsy Schiffman&#8217;s SWIPE at TechCrunch&#8217;s recently announced [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RRattt</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/13/ok-wired-lets-do-this/comment-page-4/#comment-2296900</link>
		<dc:creator>RRattt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 20:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/13/ok-wired-lets-do-this/#comment-2296900</guid>
		<description>Wanker, Abbot and Karim all have it spot on (other than my not so humble self). 

It&#039;s nice to read posts by people who can write, too. You can hear their intelligence on the screen. 

The writing on TC is often voluminous and lazily done, but the information is interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wanker, Abbot and Karim all have it spot on (other than my not so humble self). </p>
<p>It&#8217;s nice to read posts by people who can write, too. You can hear their intelligence on the screen. </p>
<p>The writing on TC is often voluminous and lazily done, but the information is interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Video comments: Actually not so bad &#187; mathewingram.com/work &#124;</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/13/ok-wired-lets-do-this/comment-page-4/#comment-2296870</link>
		<dc:creator>Video comments: Actually not so bad &#187; mathewingram.com/work &#124;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 19:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/13/ok-wired-lets-do-this/#comment-2296870</guid>
		<description>[...] on a blog to be video &#8212; but in some cases it&#8217;s kind of fun to see Mike Arrington talking about Wired magazine, or to see Fred in person chatting into his web-cam. It is much more personal (which [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on a blog to be video &#8212; but in some cases it&#8217;s kind of fun to see Mike Arrington talking about Wired magazine, or to see Fred in person chatting into his web-cam. It is much more personal (which [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abbot</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/13/ok-wired-lets-do-this/comment-page-4/#comment-2296810</link>
		<dc:creator>Abbot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 19:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/13/ok-wired-lets-do-this/#comment-2296810</guid>
		<description>Ann Coulter makes a good living being a professional troll too.

She also has a TON of fans who defend her every action.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ann Coulter makes a good living being a professional troll too.</p>
<p>She also has a TON of fans who defend her every action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John / LOLKINGDOM</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/13/ok-wired-lets-do-this/comment-page-4/#comment-2296799</link>
		<dc:creator>John / LOLKINGDOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 19:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/13/ok-wired-lets-do-this/#comment-2296799</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not Hugh Macleod but I thought I&#039;d make you a cartoon in the meantime:

http://www.lolkingdom.com/2008/05/techcrunch-and-michael-arrington-vs.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not Hugh Macleod but I thought I&#8217;d make you a cartoon in the meantime:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lolkingdom.com/2008/05/techcrunch-and-michael-arrington-vs.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.lolkingdom.com/2008/05/techcrunch-and-michael-arrington-vs.html'>http://www.lolk...rington-vs.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
