<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digging Deeper On The Top Tech Blogs And Bloggers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/12/digging-deeper-on-the-top-tech-blogs-and-bloggers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/12/digging-deeper-on-the-top-tech-blogs-and-bloggers/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 02:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sudar&#8217;s Development Blog &#187; First Indian on the Techmeme Leaderboard</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/12/digging-deeper-on-the-top-tech-blogs-and-bloggers/#comment-2546472</link>
		<dc:creator>Sudar&#8217;s Development Blog &#187; First Indian on the Techmeme Leaderboard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 19:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/12/digging-deeper-on-the-top-tech-blogs-and-bloggers/#comment-2546472</guid>
		<description>[...] at position 76 in the Techmeme Leaderboard (as I am writing this blog entry) and has already been mentioned by TechCrunch. It is a remarkable achievement for a blog which is less than 2 months old. Congrats Yuvi  and all [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at position 76 in the Techmeme Leaderboard (as I am writing this blog entry) and has already been mentioned by TechCrunch. It is a remarkable achievement for a blog which is less than 2 months old. Congrats Yuvi  and all [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techhairball.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/12/digging-deeper-on-the-top-tech-blogs-and-bloggers/#comment-2464606</link>
		<dc:creator>Techhairball.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 15:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/12/digging-deeper-on-the-top-tech-blogs-and-bloggers/#comment-2464606</guid>
		<description>Good summaries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good summaries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/12/digging-deeper-on-the-top-tech-blogs-and-bloggers/#comment-2323321</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 06:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/12/digging-deeper-on-the-top-tech-blogs-and-bloggers/#comment-2323321</guid>
		<description>Shameless plug with this post. I like the blog, it's good. Techmeme is no where near as good and their RSS feed sucks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shameless plug with this post. I like the blog, it&#8217;s good. Techmeme is no where near as good and their RSS feed sucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechMeme Is Finally Searchable</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/12/digging-deeper-on-the-top-tech-blogs-and-bloggers/#comment-2313072</link>
		<dc:creator>TechMeme Is Finally Searchable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 18:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/12/digging-deeper-on-the-top-tech-blogs-and-bloggers/#comment-2313072</guid>
		<description>[...] the BloggerBoard for details on the top tech blogs and bloggers based on TechMeme headline data.   CrunchBase Information   Techmeme  Information provided by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the BloggerBoard for details on the top tech blogs and bloggers based on TechMeme headline data.   CrunchBase Information   Techmeme  Information provided by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/12/digging-deeper-on-the-top-tech-blogs-and-bloggers/#comment-2293422</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 12:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/12/digging-deeper-on-the-top-tech-blogs-and-bloggers/#comment-2293422</guid>
		<description>Nice self-promotion TechCrunch.  Very smart move.  I'd publish any list that has my blog as being more relevant than NYTimes and CNet as well, especially considering their valuations.  Additionally, I'm assuming that you plunged into the data as part of your corporate development program around building a larger blogging network.  Any good finds out there or are they all still taking stupid VC money?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice self-promotion TechCrunch.  Very smart move.  I&#8217;d publish any list that has my blog as being more relevant than NYTimes and CNet as well, especially considering their valuations.  Additionally, I&#8217;m assuming that you plunged into the data as part of your corporate development program around building a larger blogging network.  Any good finds out there or are they all still taking stupid VC money?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pasan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/12/digging-deeper-on-the-top-tech-blogs-and-bloggers/#comment-2292622</link>
		<dc:creator>pasan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 01:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/12/digging-deeper-on-the-top-tech-blogs-and-bloggers/#comment-2292622</guid>
		<description>rumors abound on TC and now we know that tricky dick nixon (arrington) reads IP addresses of his commentors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rumors abound on TC and now we know that tricky dick nixon (arrington) reads IP addresses of his commentors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: areyouageek (?) // ~~a geeks journey through the internet~~ &#187; links for 2008-05-12</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/12/digging-deeper-on-the-top-tech-blogs-and-bloggers/#comment-2292462</link>
		<dc:creator>areyouageek (?) // ~~a geeks journey through the internet~~ &#187; links for 2008-05-12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 23:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/12/digging-deeper-on-the-top-tech-blogs-and-bloggers/#comment-2292462</guid>
		<description>[...] Digging Deeper On The Top Tech Blogs And Bloggers [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Digging Deeper On The Top Tech Blogs And Bloggers [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slimy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/12/digging-deeper-on-the-top-tech-blogs-and-bloggers/#comment-2292230</link>
		<dc:creator>Slimy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 21:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/12/digging-deeper-on-the-top-tech-blogs-and-bloggers/#comment-2292230</guid>
		<description>^ I agree. Techcrunch dominates Techmeme anyway, and most of the TC stories that make it as headlines there aren't what I would call newsworthy: they're just about the blogoshere or about a rumor that never turns out to be anything. Not saying that TC doesn't deserve a lot of headlines though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^ I agree. Techcrunch dominates Techmeme anyway, and most of the TC stories that make it as headlines there aren&#8217;t what I would call newsworthy: they&#8217;re just about the blogoshere or about a rumor that never turns out to be anything. Not saying that TC doesn&#8217;t deserve a lot of headlines though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philipp Lenssen</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/12/digging-deeper-on-the-top-tech-blogs-and-bloggers/#comment-2291771</link>
		<dc:creator>Philipp Lenssen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 17:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/12/digging-deeper-on-the-top-tech-blogs-and-bloggers/#comment-2291771</guid>
		<description>&#62; However, since getting onto Techmeme is one measure
&#62; of quality (relevance, rating amongst peers, etc), getting
&#62; onto Techmeme a lot indicates more quality.

I would say getting onto Techmeme measures how popular a story is among popular tech blogs. Whether that's a quality measure seems to be another issue (it may or may not be -- e.g. it may be there's some super high quality tech site out there which is way ahead of its time, meaning many of us don't link to it because we don't get it, or it may be that things like knowing a person in private life subconsciously influence what we link to, meaning more connected bloggers get more backlinks, etc. Also -- and I do definitely like Techmeme as a source to know "what's hot" in tech blogs, I think it's very smart in computing this and locating clusters! -- the way Techmeme is set up it seems to favor display of commentary of hot stories over commentary of stories that don't make the Techmeme frontpage).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; However, since getting onto Techmeme is one measure<br />
&gt; of quality (relevance, rating amongst peers, etc), getting<br />
&gt; onto Techmeme a lot indicates more quality.</p>
<p>I would say getting onto Techmeme measures how popular a story is among popular tech blogs. Whether that&#8217;s a quality measure seems to be another issue (it may or may not be &#8212; e.g. it may be there&#8217;s some super high quality tech site out there which is way ahead of its time, meaning many of us don&#8217;t link to it because we don&#8217;t get it, or it may be that things like knowing a person in private life subconsciously influence what we link to, meaning more connected bloggers get more backlinks, etc. Also &#8212; and I do definitely like Techmeme as a source to know &#8220;what&#8217;s hot&#8221; in tech blogs, I think it&#8217;s very smart in computing this and locating clusters! &#8212; the way Techmeme is set up it seems to favor display of commentary of hot stories over commentary of stories that don&#8217;t make the Techmeme frontpage).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry Work</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/12/digging-deeper-on-the-top-tech-blogs-and-bloggers/#comment-2291741</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 17:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/12/digging-deeper-on-the-top-tech-blogs-and-bloggers/#comment-2291741</guid>
		<description>sd &#038; others: quantity != quality.  This is true.  However, since getting onto Techmeme is one measure of quality (relevance, rating amongst peers, etc), getting onto Techmeme a lot indicates more quality.  It's not perfect -- like for really good bloggers who only post occasionally (but make it to Techmeme when they do), but it's still interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sd &#038; others: quantity != quality.  This is true.  However, since getting onto Techmeme is one measure of quality (relevance, rating amongst peers, etc), getting onto Techmeme a lot indicates more quality.  It&#8217;s not perfect &#8212; like for really good bloggers who only post occasionally (but make it to Techmeme when they do), but it&#8217;s still interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sd</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/12/digging-deeper-on-the-top-tech-blogs-and-bloggers/#comment-2291721</link>
		<dc:creator>sd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 16:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/12/digging-deeper-on-the-top-tech-blogs-and-bloggers/#comment-2291721</guid>
		<description>so are we just counting number of post? not measuring quality?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so are we just counting number of post? not measuring quality?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; ハイテク分野のブログ上位ランキングをブロガー別に集計してみた</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/12/digging-deeper-on-the-top-tech-blogs-and-bloggers/#comment-2291700</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; ハイテク分野のブログ上位ランキングをブロガー別に集計してみた</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 16:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/12/digging-deeper-on-the-top-tech-blogs-and-bloggers/#comment-2291700</guid>
		<description>[...] [原文へ] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [原文へ] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Cuthrell</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/12/digging-deeper-on-the-top-tech-blogs-and-bloggers/#comment-2291655</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Cuthrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 16:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/12/digging-deeper-on-the-top-tech-blogs-and-bloggers/#comment-2291655</guid>
		<description>I didn't know what mashable was until I attended SXSW.

I'm just sayin...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t know what mashable was until I attended SXSW.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just sayin&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/12/digging-deeper-on-the-top-tech-blogs-and-bloggers/#comment-2291653</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 16:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/12/digging-deeper-on-the-top-tech-blogs-and-bloggers/#comment-2291653</guid>
		<description>Mark, looks good, appreciate the follow-up. I expected to be included on the 90 and 30 days update, and it looks like this has been resolved. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, looks good, appreciate the follow-up. I expected to be included on the 90 and 30 days update, and it looks like this has been resolved. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark McGranaghan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/12/digging-deeper-on-the-top-tech-blogs-and-bloggers/#comment-2291559</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark McGranaghan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 15:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/12/digging-deeper-on-the-top-tech-blogs-and-bloggers/#comment-2291559</guid>
		<description>@Louis 
Yeah, your blog kinda gets the short end of the stick here, sorry about that.  Our database has several posts from your blog, though not enough to make it onto the all-time publications leaderboard (http://www.crunchbase.com/bloggerboard/tech/publication/louisgray-com) though you are on the 30-day list (http://www.crunchbase.com/bloggerboard/tech/publications?date=last_30_days).  

It seems that your posts tend to stay on the site for longer than average, which is why your Techmeme Leadboard rank is higher than your BloggerBoard rank.  Actually, if we divide the Techmeme Leaderboard "Presence" rating by the number of headline posts over the last 30 days, we get a sort of proxy for per-post impact.  Here's that measure for a handful of sites, normalized to TechCrunch = 1.0:

TechCrunch: 1.0
ReadWriteWeb: 1.1
Wall Street Journal: 0.8
TorrentFreak: 1.2
A VC: 1.0
louisgray.com: 1.35
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Louis<br />
Yeah, your blog kinda gets the short end of the stick here, sorry about that.  Our database has several posts from your blog, though not enough to make it onto the all-time publications leaderboard (http://www.crunchbase.com/bloggerboard/tech/publication/louisgray-com) though you are on the 30-day list (http://www.crunchbase.com/bloggerboard/tech/publications?date=last_30_days).  </p>
<p>It seems that your posts tend to stay on the site for longer than average, which is why your Techmeme Leadboard rank is higher than your BloggerBoard rank.  Actually, if we divide the Techmeme Leaderboard &#8220;Presence&#8221; rating by the number of headline posts over the last 30 days, we get a sort of proxy for per-post impact.  Here&#8217;s that measure for a handful of sites, normalized to TechCrunch = 1.0:</p>
<p>TechCrunch: 1.0<br />
ReadWriteWeb: 1.1<br />
Wall Street Journal: 0.8<br />
TorrentFreak: 1.2<br />
A VC: 1.0<br />
louisgray.com: 1.35</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark McGranaghan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/12/digging-deeper-on-the-top-tech-blogs-and-bloggers/#comment-2291425</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark McGranaghan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 14:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/12/digging-deeper-on-the-top-tech-blogs-and-bloggers/#comment-2291425</guid>
		<description>@Richard MacManus  
Fixed, thanks for the heads up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Richard MacManus<br />
Fixed, thanks for the heads up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/12/digging-deeper-on-the-top-tech-blogs-and-bloggers/#comment-2291414</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 14:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/12/digging-deeper-on-the-top-tech-blogs-and-bloggers/#comment-2291414</guid>
		<description>Once again, it looks like I got overlooked. Not a big deal, just a flaw in the measurements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again, it looks like I got overlooked. Not a big deal, just a flaw in the measurements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Front Page Effect – Why I’d Rather Be on Techmeme than Digg, Mixx, etc &#124; RyanSpoon.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/12/digging-deeper-on-the-top-tech-blogs-and-bloggers/#comment-2291405</link>
		<dc:creator>The Front Page Effect – Why I’d Rather Be on Techmeme than Digg, Mixx, etc &#124; RyanSpoon.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 14:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/12/digging-deeper-on-the-top-tech-blogs-and-bloggers/#comment-2291405</guid>
		<description>[...] 2* Techcrunch has posted about the top 100 bloggers based on Techmeme      [?]  Share [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2* Techcrunch has posted about the top 100 bloggers based on Techmeme      [?]  Share [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/12/digging-deeper-on-the-top-tech-blogs-and-bloggers/#comment-2291321</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 13:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/12/digging-deeper-on-the-top-tech-blogs-and-bloggers/#comment-2291321</guid>
		<description>The comments on TechDirt are usually way better than the posts.

Mike is very heavy handed with his personal agenda and worldview.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The comments on TechDirt are usually way better than the posts.</p>
<p>Mike is very heavy handed with his personal agenda and worldview.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fred wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/12/digging-deeper-on-the-top-tech-blogs-and-bloggers/#comment-2291314</link>
		<dc:creator>fred wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 13:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/12/digging-deeper-on-the-top-tech-blogs-and-bloggers/#comment-2291314</guid>
		<description>i would love someone to rate the comments of the top tech blogs. i agree about techdirt's comments. always great. they are pretty good here at TC too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i would love someone to rate the comments of the top tech blogs. i agree about techdirt&#8217;s comments. always great. they are pretty good here at TC too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gorillamoso</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/12/digging-deeper-on-the-top-tech-blogs-and-bloggers/#comment-2291287</link>
		<dc:creator>gorillamoso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 13:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/12/digging-deeper-on-the-top-tech-blogs-and-bloggers/#comment-2291287</guid>
		<description>actually, a far more useful methodology would be one which found a way to rate the actua content of a post. that is, not all posts are created equal. one or two lines, slapdash, obviously are not the equal of a post based on real research or reporting or original thought. thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>actually, a far more useful methodology would be one which found a way to rate the actua content of a post. that is, not all posts are created equal. one or two lines, slapdash, obviously are not the equal of a post based on real research or reporting or original thought. thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard MacManus</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/12/digging-deeper-on-the-top-tech-blogs-and-bloggers/#comment-2291283</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard MacManus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 13:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/12/digging-deeper-on-the-top-tech-blogs-and-bloggers/#comment-2291283</guid>
		<description>note: ReadWriteWeb is counted twice, as ReadWriteWeb and Read/WriteWeb. Please can u fix that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>note: ReadWriteWeb is counted twice, as ReadWriteWeb and Read/WriteWeb. Please can u fix that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob cobb</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/12/digging-deeper-on-the-top-tech-blogs-and-bloggers/#comment-2291276</link>
		<dc:creator>bob cobb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 13:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/12/digging-deeper-on-the-top-tech-blogs-and-bloggers/#comment-2291276</guid>
		<description>I cant remember the last time I was on cnet, especially to read their blog</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cant remember the last time I was on cnet, especially to read their blog</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NewWorldOrder</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/12/digging-deeper-on-the-top-tech-blogs-and-bloggers/#comment-2291235</link>
		<dc:creator>NewWorldOrder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 12:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/12/digging-deeper-on-the-top-tech-blogs-and-bloggers/#comment-2291235</guid>
		<description>@Dev,

I think M.A. did that on purpose.  I don't think he even wanted to bring attention to the guys real Website....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dev,</p>
<p>I think M.A. did that on purpose.  I don&#8217;t think he even wanted to bring attention to the guys real Website&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LiveCrunch</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/12/digging-deeper-on-the-top-tech-blogs-and-bloggers/#comment-2291195</link>
		<dc:creator>LiveCrunch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 12:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/12/digging-deeper-on-the-top-tech-blogs-and-bloggers/#comment-2291195</guid>
		<description>Michael, 

Why are some sites posted twice? And not combined into 1 if that is by monthly basis?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael, </p>
<p>Why are some sites posted twice? And not combined into 1 if that is by monthly basis?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.099 seconds -->
