May 9, 2008

Spotplex Suffers Identity Crisis, Stumbles Into DeadPool

Jason Kincaid

25 comments »

We introduced Spotplex in February 2007 as a potential Digg killer that served up popular stories by monitoring how many people read them. Somewhere along the way, it also turned into an Alexa-like analytics service. Unfortunately, neither market worked out for them and they’ve been forced to shut their doors.

The Digg-style service used JavaScript that was embedded on participating pages to track how often posts were read, and top-read posts were featured on Spotplex’s homepage. The service set itself apart from Digg by requiring no intervention on the reader’s part to promote a page. On the other hand, Spotplex only recorded hits on blogs that had embedded the Javascript snippets, which severely restricted its sources of content.

Spotplex’s JavaScript embeds were also used to offer an analytics service that was designed to contend with sites like Alexa and Compete. While the addition of this service marked a shift to a very different market, both of Spotplex’s services leveraged the same backend.

CEO Doyon Kim says that the company’s ultimate failure was due to a lack of adequate funding. The company underestimated the resources that were required to build and maintain its service, and it neglected to seek venture funding after its $450,000 seed round. This is surprising given Kim’s experience in the industry: he co-founded DialPad, which was acquired by Yahoo in 2005.

Spotplex is now in the TechCrunch Deadpool.

  • Sphere It

Trackbacks/Pings (Trackback URL)

  1. Web 2.0 Asia
  2. Spotplex falls into the Deadpool | Widgets Lab
  3. SpotPlex Closed Down « Matt's Blog
  4. Spotplex can't find its groove, forced to close | Blogging

Comments

RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. Daniel Brusilovsky

    Sad to see them go…

  2. Azhar

    oh, that’s a bad news. I hope they come back with a better plan and more conviction again.

  3. Daniel Brusilovsky

    @Azhar: Me too….

  4. Cindy Szponder

    Cash flow is the number one killer of new businesses. I’m surprised that the estimated funding requirement was so under the actual needs. Looks like they also tried to take on two fields rather than focus on one. Contributed to downfall?

  5. ilyena

    I have the theory of the first song we listen a day. I think this song rules over us across the next twenty four hours.
    I’m spanish, so my english is truly bad, sorry.

  6. YouYap.com

    I dont know, I just like reading about these deadpool start ups.

  7. Ivan

    Yoorl.com, has a very similar service, but without the limitation only to sites that actually have embedded some javascript… Can’t say yoorl is doing any better… But then again yoorl had no funding, and not much publicity either…

  8. nobosh.com

    Spotplex could have gone places with more time and focus.

  9. Tim G

    Sounds like they wanted to fold.

  10. Kevin Allman

    their traffic was on the up …its really sad that they ran out of funding…if someone picks it up now, the new owners can still leverage the traffic a bit…

    is running out of funding = inadequate business model?

    http://www.blubert.com - the cool stuff in tech

  11. Doyon

    Jason,

    It was sad to see our company put in your deadpool, but thanks for mentioning us anyway. However, there is a part which can be a little bit misleading. It wasn’t our developers’ fault (underestimating the requirement). Ultimately, it was my fault and all the blames should be on me. They just did their job, and they are all great engineers.

    Thanks,

    Doyon

  12. Mike

    Not enough funding to scale??? or what?

  13. Rashmi Ranjan

    $350k dollars is not enough to sustain ….

    If a website can not sustain itself with that much funding …. they need to fold ….

    with even a funding of $50k …. i can start a website and run it for 3 years without any source of income ….

    a serious look has to be taken into the development cost ….

  14. Mike

    I wonder how Spotplex spent their money… $350k is enough, but not alot. They had to be conservative in their spendings in my opinion, and from the looks of it, that never happened.

  15. Jeremy

    I think this says it all, really:
    http://www.quantcast.com/spotplex.com

    The number one issue I’ve seen when start ups go down: lack of traction. After a year if a social site can’t really gain some momentum…they really shouldn’t look for another round of funding.

    Even if the quantcast numbers are way off…60K visitors, monthly, is only 2K per day. When you add up the team involved + friends & family…that should account for a few dozen, minimum.

    Sad, though, to see a business shut down. I hope that the team involved is moving on to bigger & better things.

  16. YouYap.com

    Thats alot of money dude. Alot of people run website with almost nothing. I can get same amount of traffic with alot less money. Are you selling your domain?

  17. Cam

    Rashmi Ranjan <- is an idiot.

    a blog / basic site with no editors and dev saleries. Yes
    A scalable solution that fits their product niche. No

    50k your a Joke!

  18. Fabio

    Shame! It sounded like a cool idea to me… and sharing the same back end for both services was clever.

  19. phenom

    Sad to see them go

  20. Me

    2000 visitors a day are nothing… You can’t earn money with those. But better fold early than spending even more money into it.

  21. dEEPS

    thats bad, hope Doyon is back with something cooler :)

Leave a Reply

Continue the conversation in TechCrunch Forums