May 8, 2008

Scoop: Facebook To Announce Safety And Privacy Deal With 49 States

Erick Schonfeld

48 comments »

fbdanger.jpg
The Attorney General of Connecticut, Richard Blumenthal, is about to make an announcement at noon ET that he and the attorneys generals from 48 other states have negotiated a deal with Facebook to implement new safety and privacy rules, according to sources with knowledge of the deal. Facebook will be making its own announcement later on today. This comes on the heels of a comprehensive agreement the 49 states made with MySpace last January. (The lone holdout in both cases is Texas). Blumenthal and North Carolina Attorney General Roy Cooper co-chair the coalition that brokered the deal with MySpace. As I noted back then:

Today’s agreement between MySpace and nearly all the states attorneys general to bulk up protections against sexual predators will no doubt have spillover effects on other social networks as well. No social network can afford to look like it is lagging in this area and will do whatever it can to be at par with emerging industry norms in this area.

Now Facebook is going to announce its new Key Principles Of Social Networking Safety, which will include cooperation with law enforcement, implementing technology to protect younger users, additional safety tools for all members, and additional education and safety resources for all members. It will also join MySpace on the Internet Safety Task Force. Other areas that could see more resources thrown at them include more active reviews of images, videos, and groups, better age-limit enforcement, and linking into the sex offender database for more prompt removal of sexual predators from Facebook. With Facebook and MySpace on board, the AGs will now go after other social networks to comply with them as well.

This must have been a huge pill for Facebook to swallow. On the one hand, it cannot be seen as lagging in this area with all the real concerns about sexual predators on social networks. On the other hand, the costs of compliance will no doubt be significant.

The rules will apply not only to Facebook, but to all application developers as well. Facebook will build in more automatic warning messages when underage members are in danger of giving out personal information to an unknown adult and will restrict the ability of users to change their listed ages to under 18. Facebook has agreed to voluntarily comply with the following:

• Require companies offering services — called “widgets” or
applications — to implement and enforce Facebook’s safety and
privacy guidelines;

• Review and scrutinize requests by a user to change his or her
age. Requests to change profile ages will be logged, and
Facebook will grant only a single request to change an age above
or below 18.

• Maintain and continuously update a list of pornographic websites
and regularly sever any links to such sites;

• Increase efforts to remove groups for incest, pedophilia,
cyberbullying and other violations of the site’s terms of services
and expel from the site individual violators of those terms,

• Aggressively remove inappropriate images and content;

• More prominently display safety tips;

• Require users under 18 to affirm they have read Facebook’s
safety tips when they sign up;

report-abuse.png• Regularly review models for abuse reporting and perform a test
using the New Jersey Attorney General’s abuse reporting icon.

• Restricting searches by over-18 users so they cannot seek under-
18 users, along with other significant limits on searches;

• Limiting certain ads for age-restricted products — such as alcohol
and tobacco — to users old enough to purchase such items;

• Identifying and removing profiles of all registered sex offenders;

• Sending automatic warning messages when a child is in danger
of providing personal information to an unknown adult;

• Providing extensive privacy controls allowing the user to block
access to their profile, restrict information available to users not
their friends and prevent another user from contacting them;

• Providing parents with tools to remove their underage child’s
profile from the site.

Full release after the break.

CT ATTORNEY GENERAL ANNOUNCES NATIONWIDE AGREEMENT
WITH FACEBOOK TO MAKE SITE SAFER FOR UNDERAGE USERS

Attorney General Richard Blumenthal announced today that Facebook has
agreed to make changes to better protect children from predators and
inappropriate content and to participate in a task force on implementation of age
and identity verification software.

The agreement was reached with 49 states and the District of Columbia that
are members of a coalition co-chaired by Blumenthal and Attorney General Roy
Cooper of North Carolina.

Since 2006, Blumenthal and Cooper have led negotiations with MySpace
and Facebook as co-chairs of a working group of state attorneys general seeking
to make social networking safer. The multistate group’s Executive Committee
also includes Georgia, Idaho, Massachusetts, Mississippi, New Hampshire, Ohio,
Pennsylvania, Virginia and the District of Columbia.

Today’s Facebook agreement is similar to one that MySpace reached in
January with 49 states and the District of Columbia. MySpace agreed to more
than 60 specific safety measures and to head a task force, which Facebook has
joined, to explore and develop age and identity identification tools for social
networking sites.

“This agreement marks another milestone step for social networking safety
– protecting kids from online predators and pornography,” Blumenthal said. “We
are raising the safety bar, first for MySpace and now Facebook, and soon for
other sites as we fight for an industry gold standard. Facebook and MySpace are
showing how to aim higher and keep kids safer. Our ultimate goal is age and
identity verification technology — safeguards against child molesters and
inappropriate material. Checking ages and identities is vital to better shielding
underage users from predators and pornography.

“Our powerful national multistate coalition will continue fighting to stop
predators and pornography on these sites. The sites must recognize their responsibility. This agreement is open-ended — envisioning advances in
technology that enable even stronger safety steps.

“We appreciate Facebook’s cooperation throughout.”

Under the agreement, Facebook will:

• Require companies offering services — called “widgets” or
applications — to implement and enforce Facebook’s safety and
privacy guidelines;
• Review and scrutinize requests by a user to change his or her
age. Requests to change profile ages will be logged, and
Facebook will grant only a single request to change an age above
or below 18.
• Maintain and continuously update a list of pornographic websites
and regularly sever any links to such sites;
• Increase efforts to remove groups for incest, pedophilia,
cyberbullying and other violations of the site’s terms of services
and expel from the site individual violators of those terms,
• Aggressively remove inappropriate images and content;
• More prominently display safety tips;
• Require users under 18 to affirm they have read Facebook’s
safety tips when they sign up;
• Regularly review models for abuse reporting and perform a test
using the New Jersey Attorney General’s abuse reporting icon.
• Restricting searches by over-18 users so they cannot seek under-
18 users, along with other significant limits on searches;
• Limiting certain ads for age-restricted products — such as alcohol
and tobacco — to users old enough to purchase such items;
• Identifying and removing profiles of all registered sex offenders;
• Sending automatic warning messages when a child is in danger
of providing personal information to an unknown adult;
• Providing extensive privacy controls allowing the user to block
access to their profile, restrict information available to users not
their friends and prevent another user from contacting them;
• Providing parents with tools to remove their underage child’s
profile from the site.

Some of these measures have already been implemented by Facebook and
are formalized by this agreement.

  • Sphere It

Trackbacks/Pings (Trackback URL)

  1. Marc’s Voice » Blog Archive » More May '08 blogging
  2. TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ » 特報:Facebookが49州と子どもの安全・プライバシー保護規制導入で合意
  3. TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ » 特報:Facebookが49州と子どもの安全・プライバシー保護規制導入で合意
  4. Scoop: Facebook To Announce Safety And Privacy Deal With 49 States | Technology Blog
  5. Doko: Tween Social Networking With A Twist
  6. Facebook Signs on to Child Protection Guidelines | Advertising Blog
  7. Digital Media Kids
  8. Terbaik.Net » Blog Archive » Doko: Tween Social Networking With A Twist

Comments

RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. HDTV

    Great news…These sites are so useful and fun but you hear so many horrible stories.

  2. Rob

    Lame.

  3. Farb Nivi

    What are the details? How do other social networks learn from this? Is there a resource we can tap to see how to maintain the good graces of the states?

  4. Adam

    Any idea what the rules will be?

  5. David Giesberg

    I wonder why Texas is holding out on both of these deals?

  6. Ryan Waggoner

    I’m sure they’re all realizing that they better do something or they’re going to face legislation and no one wants to do that.

    Keep government off the Internet.

  7. Azhar

    Yup i got it , users from 49 states are able to have new safety and privacy rules but what about the rest of the World. When you think global stop acting local.

  8. Steven Finch

    this is very interesting news.. Good to see they are actually trying to do something.

  9. Gerpow

    Waiting to see what will it change…

  10. CAA

    Lame. Nothing to see here. Move along.

  11. Barbara Ling

    I think no matter how many rules are put into place, the best way for kids to avoid predators online is being educated about them, how to recognizet them, how to avoid them etc. Proactive knowledge will always be there when the parents/rules are not.

    Data points,

    Barbara

  12. Luke Hardiman

    Sounds suspect and reactionary to me. Facebook should be taking their cue from the users. From what I’ve seen of Zuckerberg he doesn’t seem like a particularly strong leader for his growing company, and it concerns me that he may be buckling to the wrong kind of knee-jerk moralising.

  13. John Ryan

    Technological kissups as Kara Swisher pointed out could be one of the reasons.

  14. Solacetech

    Good Deal! There is a HUGE difference between NET Neutrality and Lewd Criminal Activity…

  15. Kevin

    Let’s hope for something good ;)

  16. Joel Strellner

    Anyone know why Texas is holding out?

  17. Dani Magoo

    Apparently the Texas AG is holding out for an age verification system.

  18. Jeff the Great

    why do so many people think it is lame? These new policies wont effect any normal, adult, law abiding social network users.

    More than anything, it is a good PR move. Social networks are now a part of everyday life, good for MySpace and Facebook stepping up to the plate.

    and whats with Texas? Do they hate little kids or something?

  19. 113.com

    Very nice! :P

  20. Fed up

    It’s lame because this won’t prevent a single incident of anything, but it will make sure I get logged as a violator and brand me a pedophile if I forget and search for my niece on Facebook. Thanks, lazy parents. Since I have to yet again raise your kids for you, I think you owe me some child support.

  21. Soul

    The question was asked why so many people think it’s lame. I also think it’s lame because it’s another example of over-reaction. People tend to think there are child predators lurking under every bush, but in fact, instances of such are rare (but well publicized). Just go look at the DOJ statistics and find out for yourself.

    Here’s a better solutions for protecting kids from predators online… keep the offline, or teach them about the dangers of the real world and how to avoid them. But I wasting my words expecting parents to take more responsibility for their children when there are those in government and non-profits ready and willing to take that responsibility over.

  22. Josh

    This is really useful information. Great work! Thank you.

  23. Siddharth

    Privacy is the biggest issue today when most of the users data are now stored online and people are using websites for everything. I think Facebook should really do this.

  24. Wolke Snow

    > Restricting searches by over-18 users so they cannot seek under-18 users…

    Is it illegal in the US for an 18 year old to date a 17 year old?

    (Just a curious European question)

  25. alexanderpink

    Stupid. No links to pronographic sites? What is wrong with adults using social networks in an adult manner? This will not reduce any criminal activity, facebook is already safe, just make your profile private and don’t add anyone you don’t know if you are scared of predators! Parents should be responsible for governing and educating their children. The rest of society shouldn’t have to cater to the fears of the few. I think fb should have fought this…why let anyone intrude on your business with regulation when it may not be required by law (IANAL). It’s not even the right thing to do b/c it will not reduce crime and limits users options.

  26. Phil

    @24: The age of consent is 16/17 in most states in the US, so they can date anyone older. Some states have laws where a 3 year difference in age is allowed for teens, or when they are both under 21, etc.

  27. Borris

    yeah, this is pointless. all this is going to do is lull parents and probably kids into a false sense of security.

  28. Rodney Rumford

    I think they simply had to play nice as they become more mainstream and many people need to feel “protected” by their government officials.

    Looks like a lot of work to stay in compliance with all that they are announcing.

    No one really talked about the implications for FB developers. The whole issue of age now comes into play with app development. ;)

    Rodney Rumford
    http://www.facereviews.com

  29. Tony

    “But I wasting my words expecting parents to take more responsibility for their children when there are those in government and non-profits ready and willing to take that responsibility over.”

    It’s part of the overall trend of giving up personal responsibility. As long as the government is ready to step in and take care of the problem (which it does with such great efficiency!), people will continue to be willing to relinquish responsibility to the government, and then blame the government when things go wrong.

  30. Dave Barnes

    It is “attorneys general” and not “attorneys generals”.

  31. Ruslan

    As always shity parents delegate their parents’ responsibilities of control what their kids doing to somebody else. How lame ! No wonder why some of these forgotten kids then buy guns and start shooting to classmates.

  32. LN

    I can’t wait to see how many children are saved by this groundbreaking legislation!

    And yeah… so no 18 year olds can search for their slightly younger friends, without being tarred as predators? Yay for the US!

  33. Smart

    This totally ignores other countries with ages of consent lower than 18 (like everyone but US)… but I supposed these rules will apply to all regardless?

    Also, that standard button made by New Jersey AG is HIDEOUS. I think it needs more exclamation points - definitely.

  34. Spuds

    I am all for increased safety and privacy but will it really achieve what they think it will…..NO!

  35. Original Sin

    The problem with such blanket legislation is that it will force Facebook to treat an adult from say London the same way it treats a ten-year-old from New Jersey.

    To use an example from my own profile, I had a picture where I am holding a gun. I wasn’t breaking any laws, I don’t even own a gun (the picture was from a shooting range) and what I was doing was perfectly legal, but the picture was removed, twice.

    It’s annoying and indeed lame that a site that we’ve all become so dependent on has dragged the lowest common denominator so far down. As mentioned above, this false sense of security is created for all those lazy parents who want to believe that their irresponsible child is “safe” on facebook.

  36. seeb

    BIG DEAL.

    All this means is that when you sign up you have to scroll to the bottom of the terms and conditions before you can click continue and sign up.

    These sort of things arent deterrents, ok so im under 18, i check the tickbox that says i have read safety tips before i can continue. Of course i dont read it i just want to hurry through and sign up.

    The rest of the stuff on the list they should be doing anyway but these things are pretty weak.

  37. Strix

    “… it cannot be seen as lagging in this area with all the real concerns about sexual predators on social networks.” - There’s the problem right there, the concern is much more real than any actual danger this system will prevent. I resent the expectation that my discourse online should be reduced to what Facebook considers appropriate for tweens because some parents of fretting over their ‘online predator’ urban legend.

  38. Jacob

    That’s good that they’ll be beefing it up. It may help with parents’ perception of social networking to know that they’re working on it.

    But still. Sometimes the age thing drives me nuts. I’m in middle school, and really the only computer-oriented person there, the only programmer, etc. I have a couple friends, but I know absolutely 0 computer people. Would I love to find someone I could talk to about programming or the latest non-mainstream technology release? Heck yeah.

    Would I love to write Facebook apps? Heck yeah.

    But anyone who does not work towards making that impossible is viewed as evil, as a pedophile.

    I call for a “safe” social network. Or maybe even an extension of Facebook that would allow us to connect within our school but block everybody else unless the parent consented. I could do so many great things for my school community and student council if we were a Facebook group I could write apps for. The adminstration would be able to communicate with students, etc.

    Facebook, though, does do a good job deterring people as I cannot sign up with my school, therefore I cannot connect with anyone I know.

  39. Jacob

    To add to what I said, I would also like to point out that I find it extremely unlikely that one would be victimized unless one were using a social network to seek an intimate relationship.

    Finding a friend I can email about Python or the talent show is not going to get me followed home and raped, as far as I know.

  40. Gadgeteer10

    Unfortunately I am sure it will not do much, but still I will have to give thumbs up to Facebook on the big effort to stop some of these horrible cases. Also Facebook and Myspace are the leading social network websites and I am sure that many will follow their example after this announcement. Great job!

Leave a Reply

Continue the conversation in TechCrunch Forums