<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Google Invested in Clearwire</title>
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/why-google-invested-in-clearwire/</link>
	<description>Startup and Tech News</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 08:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sprint finally getting its WiMAX on &#171; Get inked</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/why-google-invested-in-clearwire/#comment-2294732</link>
		<dc:creator>Sprint finally getting its WiMAX on &#171; Get inked</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 23:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/why-google-invested-in-clearwire/#comment-2294732</guid>
		<description>[...] Why Google Invested in Clearwire [via Zemanta] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Why Google Invested in Clearwire [via Zemanta] [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technology and Gadgets Review &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why the WiMax Deal Is A Disaster, Part II (Or, How Craig McCaw Snookered Eric Schmidt)</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/why-google-invested-in-clearwire/#comment-2291401</link>
		<dc:creator>Technology and Gadgets Review &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why the WiMax Deal Is A Disaster, Part II (Or, How Craig McCaw Snookered Eric Schmidt)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 14:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/why-google-invested-in-clearwire/#comment-2291401</guid>
		<description>[...] Clearwire had to promise it would build out a richer mobile broadband service as well. This is why Google investedâto bring the broadband Internet to mobile devices (some of them hopefully running the Android [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Clearwire had to promise it would build out a richer mobile broadband service as well. This is why Google investedâto bring the broadband Internet to mobile devices (some of them hopefully running the Android [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why the WiMax Deal Is A Disaster, Part II (Or, How Craig McCaw Snookered Eric Schmidt)</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/why-google-invested-in-clearwire/#comment-2285601</link>
		<dc:creator>Why the WiMax Deal Is A Disaster, Part II (Or, How Craig McCaw Snookered Eric Schmidt)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 20:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/why-google-invested-in-clearwire/#comment-2285601</guid>
		<description>[...] Clearwire had to promise it would build out a richer mobile broadband service as well. This is why Google invested—to bring the broadband Internet to mobile devices (some of them hopefully running the Android [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Clearwire had to promise it would build out a richer mobile broadband service as well. This is why Google invested—to bring the broadband Internet to mobile devices (some of them hopefully running the Android [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stef</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/why-google-invested-in-clearwire/#comment-2284887</link>
		<dc:creator>stef</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 12:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/why-google-invested-in-clearwire/#comment-2284887</guid>
		<description>here in belgium clearwire needs to sort out their sh*t a bit better. they have ridiculous salesmen flyering lamppost and leaving business cards in burger joints saying "call me for really cheap internet". they're all slick salesmen looking douchebags that will tell you anything to get their i-signed-up-another-customer bonus. 

when you then visit their offices to create an account (yes you have to physically go to their office), there is one lazy ass guy handing out routers and the" waiting room" looks worse than a backstreet dentist in new delhi. and then ofcourse ... there is hardly any reception anywhere in brussels. simply an atrocious company, here in belgium at least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>here in belgium clearwire needs to sort out their sh*t a bit better. they have ridiculous salesmen flyering lamppost and leaving business cards in burger joints saying &#8220;call me for really cheap internet&#8221;. they&#8217;re all slick salesmen looking douchebags that will tell you anything to get their i-signed-up-another-customer bonus. </p>
<p>when you then visit their offices to create an account (yes you have to physically go to their office), there is one lazy ass guy handing out routers and the&#8221; waiting room&#8221; looks worse than a backstreet dentist in new delhi. and then ofcourse &#8230; there is hardly any reception anywhere in brussels. simply an atrocious company, here in belgium at least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webstop: Przystanek Web &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Bądź zawsze o krok przed innymi - Google właśnie wykonało krok do przodu</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/why-google-invested-in-clearwire/#comment-2284361</link>
		<dc:creator>Webstop: Przystanek Web &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Bądź zawsze o krok przed innymi - Google właśnie wykonało krok do przodu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 04:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/why-google-invested-in-clearwire/#comment-2284361</guid>
		<description>[...] Schonfeld na TechCrunch zastanawia się dlaczego Google uczestniczyło w tej inwestycji - według niego główną motywacją jest [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Schonfeld na TechCrunch zastanawia się dlaczego Google uczestniczyło w tej inwestycji - według niego główną motywacją jest [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Masoud</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/why-google-invested-in-clearwire/#comment-2283724</link>
		<dc:creator>Masoud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 18:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/why-google-invested-in-clearwire/#comment-2283724</guid>
		<description>There is more to this than just ensuring open access. Google's massive investment in the back-haul network and their data center build-up is ensuring that it is always a couple of hops away from users, and can deliver super-fast connectivity on the back-haul. If they get access to the last mile (WiFi, White-Band, WiMax, some other way), deliver a few telephony apps and couple it with their with presence and other services, you pretty much have the nuts and bolts of a new operator. Would they get into selling services directly? Maybe, maybe not. They could just as easily have thousands of neighborhood entrepreneurs who will pop-up as micro-operators selling services (subscription based, ad-based, as part of some other business).
That would be when 21st century telcos start to bring down 20th century telcos. Don't hold your breath though; this is a long show!
More at my blog: http://feeds.feedburner.com/TheUnfoldingMirror</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is more to this than just ensuring open access. Google&#8217;s massive investment in the back-haul network and their data center build-up is ensuring that it is always a couple of hops away from users, and can deliver super-fast connectivity on the back-haul. If they get access to the last mile (WiFi, White-Band, WiMax, some other way), deliver a few telephony apps and couple it with their with presence and other services, you pretty much have the nuts and bolts of a new operator. Would they get into selling services directly? Maybe, maybe not. They could just as easily have thousands of neighborhood entrepreneurs who will pop-up as micro-operators selling services (subscription based, ad-based, as part of some other business).<br />
That would be when 21st century telcos start to bring down 20th century telcos. Don&#8217;t hold your breath though; this is a long show!<br />
More at my blog: <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/TheUnfoldingMirror" rel="nofollow">http://feeds.feedburner.com/TheUnfoldingMirror</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Open?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/why-google-invested-in-clearwire/#comment-2281956</link>
		<dc:creator>Open?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 22:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/why-google-invested-in-clearwire/#comment-2281956</guid>
		<description>" ...I don’t feel that Google is really all that interested in openness after they are the default provider of a bunch of services in the wireless space."

Yep....right on the money...

And how open is it when

Google basically paid $500m to ensure that the masses are forced to use Google.....aka..."Google may also be the default search engine on devices connected to the network."

You know for sure that any Google Android device will have a great user interface...except perhaps for the portion that allows someone to attempt to change the default search browser!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; &#8230;I don’t feel that Google is really all that interested in openness after they are the default provider of a bunch of services in the wireless space.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yep&#8230;.right on the money&#8230;</p>
<p>And how open is it when</p>
<p>Google basically paid $500m to ensure that the masses are forced to use Google&#8230;..aka&#8230;&#8221;Google may also be the default search engine on devices connected to the network.&#8221;</p>
<p>You know for sure that any Google Android device will have a great user interface&#8230;except perhaps for the portion that allows someone to attempt to change the default search browser!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Kapustka</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/why-google-invested-in-clearwire/#comment-2281734</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Kapustka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 20:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/why-google-invested-in-clearwire/#comment-2281734</guid>
		<description>Even if Clearwire goes bust, this new company owns a big big swath of valuable spectrum. &lt;a href="http://www.sidecutreports.com/2008/05/02/4g-spectrum-a-bigger-bite-than-backhaul/" rel="nofollow"&gt;As we wrote earlier&lt;/a&gt;, much more spectrum at 2.5 GHz than at 700 MHz, so that alone is worth at least what the new investors put in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if Clearwire goes bust, this new company owns a big big swath of valuable spectrum. <a href="http://www.sidecutreports.com/2008/05/02/4g-spectrum-a-bigger-bite-than-backhaul/" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/www.sidecutreports.com');">As we wrote earlier</a>, much more spectrum at 2.5 GHz than at 700 MHz, so that alone is worth at least what the new investors put in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erick Schonfeld</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/why-google-invested-in-clearwire/#comment-2281695</link>
		<dc:creator>Erick Schonfeld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 20:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/why-google-invested-in-clearwire/#comment-2281695</guid>
		<description>@ Derek, Why so unquestioning?  By your logic, anything Google or Intel touches can't fail.

And, oh, Intel actually backed away from this deal.  It only put in half of what it was originally asked for last year.  And Google had to be pulled in kicking and screaming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Derek, Why so unquestioning?  By your logic, anything Google or Intel touches can&#8217;t fail.</p>
<p>And, oh, Intel actually backed away from this deal.  It only put in half of what it was originally asked for last year.  And Google had to be pulled in kicking and screaming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chewy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/why-google-invested-in-clearwire/#comment-2281570</link>
		<dc:creator>Chewy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 19:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/why-google-invested-in-clearwire/#comment-2281570</guid>
		<description>Clearwire is a terrible service. I want to hear from one user who actually likes the service they offer. Google the words "clearwire sucks" and see how people really feel about this brand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clearwire is a terrible service. I want to hear from one user who actually likes the service they offer. Google the words &#8220;clearwire sucks&#8221; and see how people really feel about this brand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mogilny</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/why-google-invested-in-clearwire/#comment-2281486</link>
		<dc:creator>Mogilny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 18:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/why-google-invested-in-clearwire/#comment-2281486</guid>
		<description>WiMAX was all the rage back in 2005.  It is 2008, i have seen only one WiMAX mobile device.   One.  In comparison, in Korea, they have WiBro setup already.  People can sign up for 22 bucks a month for unlimited download.  They can even access it on their subway systems (yes, they even have an efficient subway system there).  WiBro was setup by one telecom company, KT, not an orgy of companies with their own selfish interests.  Also, WiBro was setup only in Soeul.  I don't get why WiMAX needs to roll out with a nation wide strategy while it can start rolling out in a metro area.. (oh, maybe the bay area?).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WiMAX was all the rage back in 2005.  It is 2008, i have seen only one WiMAX mobile device.   One.  In comparison, in Korea, they have WiBro setup already.  People can sign up for 22 bucks a month for unlimited download.  They can even access it on their subway systems (yes, they even have an efficient subway system there).  WiBro was setup by one telecom company, KT, not an orgy of companies with their own selfish interests.  Also, WiBro was setup only in Soeul.  I don&#8217;t get why WiMAX needs to roll out with a nation wide strategy while it can start rolling out in a metro area.. (oh, maybe the bay area?).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/why-google-invested-in-clearwire/#comment-2281439</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 18:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/why-google-invested-in-clearwire/#comment-2281439</guid>
		<description>Pocket change for google</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pocket change for google</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; グーグルがClearwireに出資した理由</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/why-google-invested-in-clearwire/#comment-2281368</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; グーグルがClearwireに出資した理由</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 17:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/why-google-invested-in-clearwire/#comment-2281368</guid>
		<description>[...] [原文へ] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] [原文へ] [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MDH</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/why-google-invested-in-clearwire/#comment-2281343</link>
		<dc:creator>MDH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 17:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/why-google-invested-in-clearwire/#comment-2281343</guid>
		<description>"Clearwire won’t go “bust”, Clearwire may not meet high expectations, but I 100% guarantee Clearwire &#38; WiMAX won’t go “bust”."

I'll bet there are plenty of people who said that about - http://tinyurl.com/4uaf5g

It's an awfully conflicted investment group on this deal - although I agree with most of the posts that you have to admire and cheer that Google is putting their money behind their efforts to encourage open networks - hope it works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Clearwire won’t go “bust”, Clearwire may not meet high expectations, but I 100% guarantee Clearwire &amp; WiMAX won’t go “bust”.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll bet there are plenty of people who said that about - <a href="http://tinyurl.com/4uaf5g" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/4uaf5g</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s an awfully conflicted investment group on this deal - although I agree with most of the posts that you have to admire and cheer that Google is putting their money behind their efforts to encourage open networks - hope it works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jro</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/why-google-invested-in-clearwire/#comment-2281284</link>
		<dc:creator>jro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 16:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/why-google-invested-in-clearwire/#comment-2281284</guid>
		<description>Google sure does use that word "open" a lot, and in the mobile space it's no different.

I wish things were open on wireless airwaves, but somehow I don't feel that Google is really all that interested in openness after they are the default provider of a bunch of services in the wireless space.

It's probably better than the status quo, but call me skeptical.  The whole "frying-pan/fryer" reference comes to mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google sure does use that word &#8220;open&#8221; a lot, and in the mobile space it&#8217;s no different.</p>
<p>I wish things were open on wireless airwaves, but somehow I don&#8217;t feel that Google is really all that interested in openness after they are the default provider of a bunch of services in the wireless space.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s probably better than the status quo, but call me skeptical.  The whole &#8220;frying-pan/fryer&#8221; reference comes to mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/why-google-invested-in-clearwire/#comment-2281282</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 16:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/why-google-invested-in-clearwire/#comment-2281282</guid>
		<description>Please hurry .... my EVDO is expensive and there is a ton of innovation to occur in the wireless broadband space.  EVDO is good, but not mass market due to cost.  Im excited about all consumer devices becoming wireless broadband ones!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please hurry &#8230;. my EVDO is expensive and there is a ton of innovation to occur in the wireless broadband space.  EVDO is good, but not mass market due to cost.  Im excited about all consumer devices becoming wireless broadband ones!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WontBust</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/why-google-invested-in-clearwire/#comment-2281276</link>
		<dc:creator>WontBust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 16:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/why-google-invested-in-clearwire/#comment-2281276</guid>
		<description>I gotta agree with Derek... at least in the idea that it won't go bust.

Sprint, WiMax, Intel, Google... Sprint may have been in the dumps for a while, but it's not run by idiots... not entirely.  As a former Sprint Employee, I gotta say I like what they're doing... and I've seen them do some dumb stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I gotta agree with Derek&#8230; at least in the idea that it won&#8217;t go bust.</p>
<p>Sprint, WiMax, Intel, Google&#8230; Sprint may have been in the dumps for a while, but it&#8217;s not run by idiots&#8230; not entirely.  As a former Sprint Employee, I gotta say I like what they&#8217;re doing&#8230; and I&#8217;ve seen them do some dumb stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SKoop</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/why-google-invested-in-clearwire/#comment-2281258</link>
		<dc:creator>SKoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 16:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/why-google-invested-in-clearwire/#comment-2281258</guid>
		<description>Mike Skupin is #1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike Skupin is #1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cyntia</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/why-google-invested-in-clearwire/#comment-2281250</link>
		<dc:creator>cyntia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 16:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/why-google-invested-in-clearwire/#comment-2281250</guid>
		<description>Nice...
:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice&#8230;<br />
 <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Gathright</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/why-google-invested-in-clearwire/#comment-2281238</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Gathright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 15:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/why-google-invested-in-clearwire/#comment-2281238</guid>
		<description>"If Clearwire should ever go bust, though, that’s $500 million down the drain."

Why such a hater?  Between this and the other post, seems like you have zero faith in what really is such a promising technology.  I'm gonna take a wild stab in the dark and say Google &#38; Intel are smarter than Erick Schonfeld.  I could totally be wrong on that, and TechCrunch may have the next Gates, Zuckerberg, or Brin working for them, but hmmm.... I gonna throw my chips on "No".  They know what they are getting into.  Intel has pretty much staked it's reputation on this considering the billions of dollars they've spent and the companies they've lobbied.  If WiMAX succeeds, it will expand to developing nations and the Intel OLPC type laptop will become even more attractive.  Jackpot for Intel.  Google is investing simply because it offers another entry point for devices on the internet.  Hell, I wouldn't be surprised to see them sell off their shares once this becomes self-sustaining.  This isn't an investment for monetary gain for Google, it just ensures that there is at least 1 "open" wireless entry point, and that is their main concern right now.

Clearwire won't go "bust", Clearwire may not meet high expectations, but I 100% guarantee Clearwire &#38; WiMAX won't go "bust".

Can we have Duncan back?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If Clearwire should ever go bust, though, that’s $500 million down the drain.&#8221;</p>
<p>Why such a hater?  Between this and the other post, seems like you have zero faith in what really is such a promising technology.  I&#8217;m gonna take a wild stab in the dark and say Google &amp; Intel are smarter than Erick Schonfeld.  I could totally be wrong on that, and TechCrunch may have the next Gates, Zuckerberg, or Brin working for them, but hmmm&#8230;. I gonna throw my chips on &#8220;No&#8221;.  They know what they are getting into.  Intel has pretty much staked it&#8217;s reputation on this considering the billions of dollars they&#8217;ve spent and the companies they&#8217;ve lobbied.  If WiMAX succeeds, it will expand to developing nations and the Intel OLPC type laptop will become even more attractive.  Jackpot for Intel.  Google is investing simply because it offers another entry point for devices on the internet.  Hell, I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised to see them sell off their shares once this becomes self-sustaining.  This isn&#8217;t an investment for monetary gain for Google, it just ensures that there is at least 1 &#8220;open&#8221; wireless entry point, and that is their main concern right now.</p>
<p>Clearwire won&#8217;t go &#8220;bust&#8221;, Clearwire may not meet high expectations, but I 100% guarantee Clearwire &amp; WiMAX won&#8217;t go &#8220;bust&#8221;.</p>
<p>Can we have Duncan back?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ferodynamics</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/why-google-invested-in-clearwire/#comment-2281235</link>
		<dc:creator>Ferodynamics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 15:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/why-google-invested-in-clearwire/#comment-2281235</guid>
		<description>I know this is a little OT, but I had to clarify.  This is from iGoogle, their new (artsy) widgets homepage/desktop:

"Google makes no promises or representations about its performance, quality, or content."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this is a little OT, but I had to clarify.  This is from iGoogle, their new (artsy) widgets homepage/desktop:</p>
<p>&#8220;Google makes no promises or representations about its performance, quality, or content.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ferodynamics</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/why-google-invested-in-clearwire/#comment-2281229</link>
		<dc:creator>Ferodynamics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 15:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/why-google-invested-in-clearwire/#comment-2281229</guid>
		<description>Sounds cool, as long as we're not forced to use Google widgets.  

It bothers me Google is pushing iGoogle and these widgets but they don't stand behind them enough to ensure they are safe, according to their own disclaimer they don't vouch for their own widgets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds cool, as long as we&#8217;re not forced to use Google widgets.  </p>
<p>It bothers me Google is pushing iGoogle and these widgets but they don&#8217;t stand behind them enough to ensure they are safe, according to their own disclaimer they don&#8217;t vouch for their own widgets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sumesh</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/why-google-invested-in-clearwire/#comment-2281199</link>
		<dc:creator>Sumesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 15:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/why-google-invested-in-clearwire/#comment-2281199</guid>
		<description>"If Clearwire should ever go bust, though, that’s $500 million down the drain"

For a company that stores $10b in cash, and spent $1-3 billion in acquisitions, $500m would be like five pennies.

If they get it right, that's good for Google, if they're bust, Google still loses less than a billion. Bah!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If Clearwire should ever go bust, though, that’s $500 million down the drain&#8221;</p>
<p>For a company that stores $10b in cash, and spent $1-3 billion in acquisitions, $500m would be like five pennies.</p>
<p>If they get it right, that&#8217;s good for Google, if they&#8217;re bust, Google still loses less than a billion. Bah!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cindy Szponder</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/why-google-invested-in-clearwire/#comment-2281197</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy Szponder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 15:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/why-google-invested-in-clearwire/#comment-2281197</guid>
		<description>With Sprint as a player in Clearwire, I feel that Google did take a bit of a risk investing in this particular venture. However, if Clearwire is successful it will be a great investment. Anyone out there have $500M to gamble with? Perhaps Google has better information on the stability of the venture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With Sprint as a player in Clearwire, I feel that Google did take a bit of a risk investing in this particular venture. However, if Clearwire is successful it will be a great investment. Anyone out there have $500M to gamble with? Perhaps Google has better information on the stability of the venture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MyMesh</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/why-google-invested-in-clearwire/#comment-2281172</link>
		<dc:creator>MyMesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 15:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/why-google-invested-in-clearwire/#comment-2281172</guid>
		<description>It would be a real question if google invested not.. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be a real question if google invested not.. <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.379 seconds -->
