<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft&#8217;s Corporate Development Strategy Changing Daily</title>
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/microsofts-corporate-development-strategy-changing-daily/</link>
	<description>Startup and Tech News</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 10:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: studimaus</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/microsofts-corporate-development-strategy-changing-daily/#comment-2282830</link>
		<dc:creator>studimaus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 06:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/microsofts-corporate-development-strategy-changing-daily/#comment-2282830</guid>
		<description>michael, you really think microsoft would do anything postive with yahoo!? they would be too busy restructruring yahoo!, porting services to microsoft products and when they are done, nothing will really work.

the deal would not do any good for microsoft, and not for yahoo! either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>michael, you really think microsoft would do anything postive with yahoo!? they would be too busy restructruring yahoo!, porting services to microsoft products and when they are done, nothing will really work.</p>
<p>the deal would not do any good for microsoft, and not for yahoo! either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Microsoft szemett vetett a Facebook-ra &#171; pixelRainbow</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/microsofts-corporate-development-strategy-changing-daily/#comment-2281740</link>
		<dc:creator>A Microsoft szemett vetett a Facebook-ra &#171; pixelRainbow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 20:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/microsofts-corporate-development-strategy-changing-daily/#comment-2281740</guid>
		<description>[...] Microsoft szemett vetett a&#160;Facebook-ra  A mai nap arról kezdtek több helyről szállingózni a pletykák, hogy a Microsoft (MS) képviselője megkereste Mark Zuckerberget, mennyire hajlanának [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Microsoft szemett vetett a&nbsp;Facebook-ra  A mai nap arról kezdtek több helyről szállingózni a pletykák, hogy a Microsoft (MS) képviselője megkereste Mark Zuckerberget, mennyire hajlanának [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pandrogas</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/microsofts-corporate-development-strategy-changing-daily/#comment-2281561</link>
		<dc:creator>Pandrogas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 19:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/microsofts-corporate-development-strategy-changing-daily/#comment-2281561</guid>
		<description>If Microsoft wants to fix their internet strategy, maybe, just maybe, they could stop being such a cluster**** operation and at the very least maintain more of their existing live.com offerings.  To mention that Live.com still looks fractured (though not as fractured as Yahoo's stuff, but that's mostly style) should be another indicator.

Buy other companies for the tech, but MS still needs to get their **** together at home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Microsoft wants to fix their internet strategy, maybe, just maybe, they could stop being such a cluster**** operation and at the very least maintain more of their existing live.com offerings.  To mention that Live.com still looks fractured (though not as fractured as Yahoo&#8217;s stuff, but that&#8217;s mostly style) should be another indicator.</p>
<p>Buy other companies for the tech, but MS still needs to get their **** together at home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/microsofts-corporate-development-strategy-changing-daily/#comment-2281371</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 17:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/microsofts-corporate-development-strategy-changing-daily/#comment-2281371</guid>
		<description>meh. A few weeks ago Bill made an offhand comment about windows and suddenly all the folks who read too much into his nattering, like yourself, were convinced he was hinting at an early release for windows 7. MS had to clarify his statements (like the often do). The idea these comments have any to do with their overall strategy is silly. Who considers Gates "media trained"? He's not and never has been the guy that drops hints. Reading these statements as some massive 180 difference is melodramatic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>meh. A few weeks ago Bill made an offhand comment about windows and suddenly all the folks who read too much into his nattering, like yourself, were convinced he was hinting at an early release for windows 7. MS had to clarify his statements (like the often do). The idea these comments have any to do with their overall strategy is silly. Who considers Gates &#8220;media trained&#8221;? He&#8217;s not and never has been the guy that drops hints. Reading these statements as some massive 180 difference is melodramatic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Arrington</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/microsofts-corporate-development-strategy-changing-daily/#comment-2281339</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Arrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 17:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/microsofts-corporate-development-strategy-changing-daily/#comment-2281339</guid>
		<description>studimaus - getting lots of comments like yours. I've said this before but not recently - the reason why I want this deal to happen is that both microsoft and yahoo need it to have any chance of competing with google. the health of the internet demands a balance of power, and there is no balance there now. I may write a post explaining this in more detail.

but you are 100% right that i predicted the deal would happen. I still think it will, as do the markets. more on that later. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>studimaus - getting lots of comments like yours. I&#8217;ve said this before but not recently - the reason why I want this deal to happen is that both microsoft and yahoo need it to have any chance of competing with google. the health of the internet demands a balance of power, and there is no balance there now. I may write a post explaining this in more detail.</p>
<p>but you are 100% right that i predicted the deal would happen. I still think it will, as do the markets. more on that later. <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: studimaus</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/microsofts-corporate-development-strategy-changing-daily/#comment-2281317</link>
		<dc:creator>studimaus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 17:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/microsofts-corporate-development-strategy-changing-daily/#comment-2281317</guid>
		<description>michael, seems you still cannot accept that the microsoft yahoo! deal did nt happen. don't know why you want it. and no, guess you are one of the few that still thinks it will happen. see, yahoo!'s share are higher than before the offer, microsoft's are lower than before the offer. so who lost?

all your groundless presumptions won't change what happened. but guess all these messages are catching a lot of readers like me. ;-) nothing more!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>michael, seems you still cannot accept that the microsoft yahoo! deal did nt happen. don&#8217;t know why you want it. and no, guess you are one of the few that still thinks it will happen. see, yahoo!&#8217;s share are higher than before the offer, microsoft&#8217;s are lower than before the offer. so who lost?</p>
<p>all your groundless presumptions won&#8217;t change what happened. but guess all these messages are catching a lot of readers like me. <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> nothing more!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/microsofts-corporate-development-strategy-changing-daily/#comment-2281316</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 16:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/microsofts-corporate-development-strategy-changing-daily/#comment-2281316</guid>
		<description>I think too much is being read into this.  Often, you have to aggregate all of these specific comments to specific questions, and then form an overall picture.  In this case, Gates might have been trying to convey something to a very specific question about acquisitions, while the partnering comment may have been in regard to alliances/partnerships/etc.

In any case, I think we are looking too closely for intent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think too much is being read into this.  Often, you have to aggregate all of these specific comments to specific questions, and then form an overall picture.  In this case, Gates might have been trying to convey something to a very specific question about acquisitions, while the partnering comment may have been in regard to alliances/partnerships/etc.</p>
<p>In any case, I think we are looking too closely for intent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ValleyGuy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/microsofts-corporate-development-strategy-changing-daily/#comment-2281315</link>
		<dc:creator>ValleyGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 16:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/microsofts-corporate-development-strategy-changing-daily/#comment-2281315</guid>
		<description>Mike,

I'm not sure if "partnerships " translates to acquisition. You're reading too much into it. Must be the lawyer within u :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure if &#8220;partnerships &#8221; translates to acquisition. You&#8217;re reading too much into it. Must be the lawyer within u <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wade</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/microsofts-corporate-development-strategy-changing-daily/#comment-2281300</link>
		<dc:creator>Wade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 16:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/microsofts-corporate-development-strategy-changing-daily/#comment-2281300</guid>
		<description>Microsoft is absolutely doing the right things and saying the right things regarding this whole YHOO deal.

I hope the shareholders kick Yang right in the Yangers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft is absolutely doing the right things and saying the right things regarding this whole YHOO deal.</p>
<p>I hope the shareholders kick Yang right in the Yangers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/microsofts-corporate-development-strategy-changing-daily/#comment-2281281</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 16:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/microsofts-corporate-development-strategy-changing-daily/#comment-2281281</guid>
		<description>Hi Bill, if you are reading through, we're taking investments in my new company. The details are on the home page of our social network http://www.sitespaces.net</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bill, if you are reading through, we&#8217;re taking investments in my new company. The details are on the home page of our social network <a href="http://www.sitespaces.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.sitespaces.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim M</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/microsofts-corporate-development-strategy-changing-daily/#comment-2281272</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 16:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/microsofts-corporate-development-strategy-changing-daily/#comment-2281272</guid>
		<description>It's Yahoo all the way. think different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s Yahoo all the way. think different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelos</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/microsofts-corporate-development-strategy-changing-daily/#comment-2281270</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 16:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/microsofts-corporate-development-strategy-changing-daily/#comment-2281270</guid>
		<description>While this is probably just poor word choice from Gates (does he have a speech writing team?), there is a difference between a partnership and an acquisition.  With a partnership, Microsoft can avoid some of the bureaucracy involved with forming consensus in a room full of powerful egos.  

Coupled with the presidential election, Microhoo is producing a huge pile of non-news.  2008: When American's Became Clairvoyant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While this is probably just poor word choice from Gates (does he have a speech writing team?), there is a difference between a partnership and an acquisition.  With a partnership, Microsoft can avoid some of the bureaucracy involved with forming consensus in a room full of powerful egos.  </p>
<p>Coupled with the presidential election, Microhoo is producing a huge pile of non-news.  2008: When American&#8217;s Became Clairvoyant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James V. Reagan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/microsofts-corporate-development-strategy-changing-daily/#comment-2281236</link>
		<dc:creator>James V. Reagan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 15:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/microsofts-corporate-development-strategy-changing-daily/#comment-2281236</guid>
		<description>I interpreted Bill's comments Monday as corporate speak for "no comment."  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I interpreted Bill&#8217;s comments Monday as corporate speak for &#8220;no comment.&#8221;  <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/microsofts-corporate-development-strategy-changing-daily/#comment-2281227</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 15:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/microsofts-corporate-development-strategy-changing-daily/#comment-2281227</guid>
		<description>But.... but... but... what about Ballmer's grand 5 year plan?

http://blog.wired.com/business/2007/10/microsoft-wants.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But&#8230;. but&#8230; but&#8230; what about Ballmer&#8217;s grand 5 year plan?</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.wired.com/business/2007/10/microsoft-wants.html" rel="nofollow">http://blog.wired.com/business.....wants.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Warfield</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/microsofts-corporate-development-strategy-changing-daily/#comment-2281201</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Warfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 15:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/microsofts-corporate-development-strategy-changing-daily/#comment-2281201</guid>
		<description>This is much worse for Yahoo than Microsoft playing possum to get them at a better price.  Think about Microsoft's culture and the personalities of their leaders.  They're done with Yahoo.  Yahoo fought too hard instead of welcoming the embrace.

Microsoft's next logical move is to totally attack Yahoo to take the market share.  It's the old Alexander the Great tactic.  Circle the city, give them 24 hours to surrender, or tell them their city will be sacked.  Yahoo choose the latter option.

Microsoft's culture is ideally tuned to lay waste to a weaker foe.  They'd much rather focus that energy and attack on Yahoo than Google because Google is not winnable, at least not right now.  

Even worse for Yahoo is that Google may see that coming and decide they need to attack as well, lest Microsoft get all the share.

Business is war, and Microsoft has the warlords.

More on my blog:

http://smoothspan.wordpress.com/2008/05/07/is-microsoft-playing-possum-for-yahoo-it-could-be-much-worse/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is much worse for Yahoo than Microsoft playing possum to get them at a better price.  Think about Microsoft&#8217;s culture and the personalities of their leaders.  They&#8217;re done with Yahoo.  Yahoo fought too hard instead of welcoming the embrace.</p>
<p>Microsoft&#8217;s next logical move is to totally attack Yahoo to take the market share.  It&#8217;s the old Alexander the Great tactic.  Circle the city, give them 24 hours to surrender, or tell them their city will be sacked.  Yahoo choose the latter option.</p>
<p>Microsoft&#8217;s culture is ideally tuned to lay waste to a weaker foe.  They&#8217;d much rather focus that energy and attack on Yahoo than Google because Google is not winnable, at least not right now.  </p>
<p>Even worse for Yahoo is that Google may see that coming and decide they need to attack as well, lest Microsoft get all the share.</p>
<p>Business is war, and Microsoft has the warlords.</p>
<p>More on my blog:</p>
<p><a href="http://smoothspan.wordpress.com/2008/05/07/is-microsoft-playing-possum-for-yahoo-it-could-be-much-worse/" rel="nofollow">http://smoothspan.wordpress.co.....uch-worse/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon56</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/microsofts-corporate-development-strategy-changing-daily/#comment-2281187</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon56</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 15:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/microsofts-corporate-development-strategy-changing-daily/#comment-2281187</guid>
		<description>ignore my prev comment...looks like he was refering to the same thing both days. That's weird. I guess the second one was to drive the stock price up in the short term</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ignore my prev comment&#8230;looks like he was refering to the same thing both days. That&#8217;s weird. I guess the second one was to drive the stock price up in the short term</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: techcrunchreader</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/microsofts-corporate-development-strategy-changing-daily/#comment-2281184</link>
		<dc:creator>techcrunchreader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 15:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/microsofts-corporate-development-strategy-changing-daily/#comment-2281184</guid>
		<description>Yahoo's top shareholders:
Filo  5.8%
Yang 3.9%
Top institutionals: more than 30%
Capital Research: was 11%...now at 16%

Gordon Crawford (Capital Research) is pissed at Yahoo, like I said in an earlier comment. He will oust  Yang within a year. Remember what happened to Steve Case from AOL?

So now, the MSFT strategy is the same: 
1-Let the stock tank, 
2-Let institutions be angry (replace?) at Yang &#38; friends, 
3-Go hostile. (Shareholders will welcome MSFT with open arms)

Of course Bill and Steven won't say that to the media. 

But Gates's speech was coherent with the strategy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahoo&#8217;s top shareholders:<br />
Filo  5.8%<br />
Yang 3.9%<br />
Top institutionals: more than 30%<br />
Capital Research: was 11%&#8230;now at 16%</p>
<p>Gordon Crawford (Capital Research) is pissed at Yahoo, like I said in an earlier comment. He will oust  Yang within a year. Remember what happened to Steve Case from AOL?</p>
<p>So now, the MSFT strategy is the same:<br />
1-Let the stock tank,<br />
2-Let institutions be angry (replace?) at Yang &amp; friends,<br />
3-Go hostile. (Shareholders will welcome MSFT with open arms)</p>
<p>Of course Bill and Steven won&#8217;t say that to the media. </p>
<p>But Gates&#8217;s speech was coherent with the strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon56</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/microsofts-corporate-development-strategy-changing-daily/#comment-2281182</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon56</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 15:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/microsofts-corporate-development-strategy-changing-daily/#comment-2281182</guid>
		<description>The first comment refers to partnerships and acquisitions in general(like the one with Hyundai) while the latest one talks about the online space...

Taken out of context they seem to contradict each other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first comment refers to partnerships and acquisitions in general(like the one with Hyundai) while the latest one talks about the online space&#8230;</p>
<p>Taken out of context they seem to contradict each other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jc</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/microsofts-corporate-development-strategy-changing-daily/#comment-2281167</link>
		<dc:creator>jc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 15:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/microsofts-corporate-development-strategy-changing-daily/#comment-2281167</guid>
		<description>I think MS still wants yahoo and is just waiting for the stock to bottom out before putting in another bid.  I don't think Ballmer will give up this easily and will get yahoo at 33 one way or another.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think MS still wants yahoo and is just waiting for the stock to bottom out before putting in another bid.  I don&#8217;t think Ballmer will give up this easily and will get yahoo at 33 one way or another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tower of Hanoi</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/microsofts-corporate-development-strategy-changing-daily/#comment-2281151</link>
		<dc:creator>Tower of Hanoi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 15:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/microsofts-corporate-development-strategy-changing-daily/#comment-2281151</guid>
		<description>I think strategies evolve..   it doesn't change rapidly in a day or two..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think strategies evolve..   it doesn&#8217;t change rapidly in a day or two..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sramana Mitra</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/microsofts-corporate-development-strategy-changing-daily/#comment-2281117</link>
		<dc:creator>Sramana Mitra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 14:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/microsofts-corporate-development-strategy-changing-daily/#comment-2281117</guid>
		<description>Here's my take on Microsoft's Shopping list:
http://sramanamitra.com/2008/05/05/microsofts-shopping-list/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s my take on Microsoft&#8217;s Shopping list:<br />
<a href="http://sramanamitra.com/2008/05/05/microsofts-shopping-list/" rel="nofollow">http://sramanamitra.com/2008/0.....ping-list/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed L</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/microsofts-corporate-development-strategy-changing-daily/#comment-2281116</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 14:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/microsofts-corporate-development-strategy-changing-daily/#comment-2281116</guid>
		<description>I think that despite paying for surveys to state the contrary ( http://idisposable.net/2008/05/07/microsofts-web-20-developer-program-scores-points-but-read-the-fine-print/ ) , Microsoft has a crisis on their hands in terms of cloud computing and the shift of applications to services.  

At what point will the elephant in the room start knocking about?  When people are buying Linux based PC's to bridge the gap between cell phone and notebook, and Apple is taking more market share every quarter, of course Microsoft won't sit idly by.

However, I am not sure they can "buy" their way out of this. For every MSN Live, there are Facebooks and Myspace.  For every ad play they make, Google makes their ad supercomputer better.  I think Bill G has to pull a rabbit out of the hat here, and quick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that despite paying for surveys to state the contrary ( <a href="http://idisposable.net/2008/05/07/microsofts-web-20-developer-program-scores-points-but-read-the-fine-print/" rel="nofollow">http://idisposable.net/2008/05.....ine-print/</a> ) , Microsoft has a crisis on their hands in terms of cloud computing and the shift of applications to services.  </p>
<p>At what point will the elephant in the room start knocking about?  When people are buying Linux based PC&#8217;s to bridge the gap between cell phone and notebook, and Apple is taking more market share every quarter, of course Microsoft won&#8217;t sit idly by.</p>
<p>However, I am not sure they can &#8220;buy&#8221; their way out of this. For every MSN Live, there are Facebooks and Myspace.  For every ad play they make, Google makes their ad supercomputer better.  I think Bill G has to pull a rabbit out of the hat here, and quick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luther</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/microsofts-corporate-development-strategy-changing-daily/#comment-2281097</link>
		<dc:creator>Luther</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 14:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/microsofts-corporate-development-strategy-changing-daily/#comment-2281097</guid>
		<description>Seems like a neurotic need to always resent what other people have. What's wrong with an operating system near monopoly?

With all their moolah, you'd think M$ could perfect Live Search and compete with Google. Does Google have a patent position that prevents this? I don't know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like a neurotic need to always resent what other people have. What&#8217;s wrong with an operating system near monopoly?</p>
<p>With all their moolah, you&#8217;d think M$ could perfect Live Search and compete with Google. Does Google have a patent position that prevents this? I don&#8217;t know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sipboy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/microsofts-corporate-development-strategy-changing-daily/#comment-2281087</link>
		<dc:creator>Sipboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 14:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/microsofts-corporate-development-strategy-changing-daily/#comment-2281087</guid>
		<description>I would agree that there is a contradiction there. But any business person would change their stance if a great opportunity presented itself, even if it means being contradictory. I am reading into this with the belief that a new opportunity has presented itself in a fairly short time frame, but he can't speak about it at this point. Let's remember, Gates is arguably one of the best visionaries of our time who has been able to capitalize on great opportunities at key points. You have to believe MSFT has a strategy, even if it sounds contradicting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would agree that there is a contradiction there. But any business person would change their stance if a great opportunity presented itself, even if it means being contradictory. I am reading into this with the belief that a new opportunity has presented itself in a fairly short time frame, but he can&#8217;t speak about it at this point. Let&#8217;s remember, Gates is arguably one of the best visionaries of our time who has been able to capitalize on great opportunities at key points. You have to believe MSFT has a strategy, even if it sounds contradicting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eve</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/microsofts-corporate-development-strategy-changing-daily/#comment-2281082</link>
		<dc:creator>Eve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 14:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/07/microsofts-corporate-development-strategy-changing-daily/#comment-2281082</guid>
		<description>Michael-

Here's the deal.  They have until 5/15 to nominate a slate of replacement board members.  They will either wait until the last hour, or have a small shareholder nominate the MS slate without their direct involvement, or pass entirely (my guess).

In any of those scenarios, 5/15 will be an UGLY day for Yahoo stock.  REAL bad.  5/15 to 7/3 will be a blood bath.  And then Microsoft comes in and makes their $34 per share final offer and it gets done, or Yang is strung up by his privates on a flagpole in front of corporate HQ.

The stock has plenty of room to drop, and it won't drop until MS passes on nominating a slate.  

So the correct gamblers' strategy is to get out now, and back in a little more every day until MS buys in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael-</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the deal.  They have until 5/15 to nominate a slate of replacement board members.  They will either wait until the last hour, or have a small shareholder nominate the MS slate without their direct involvement, or pass entirely (my guess).</p>
<p>In any of those scenarios, 5/15 will be an UGLY day for Yahoo stock.  REAL bad.  5/15 to 7/3 will be a blood bath.  And then Microsoft comes in and makes their $34 per share final offer and it gets done, or Yang is strung up by his privates on a flagpole in front of corporate HQ.</p>
<p>The stock has plenty of room to drop, and it won&#8217;t drop until MS passes on nominating a slate.  </p>
<p>So the correct gamblers&#8217; strategy is to get out now, and back in a little more every day until MS buys in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.373 seconds -->
