<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Arrington and Ross Sorkin Talk About Yahoo On Charlie Rose</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/06/arrington-and-ross-sorkin-talk-about-yahoo-on-charlie-rose/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/06/arrington-and-ross-sorkin-talk-about-yahoo-on-charlie-rose/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:22:59 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mighty Sam Faceball</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/06/arrington-and-ross-sorkin-talk-about-yahoo-on-charlie-rose/comment-page-1/#comment-2284396</link>
		<dc:creator>Mighty Sam Faceball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 05:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/06/arrington-and-ross-sorkin-talk-about-yahoo-on-charlie-rose/#comment-2284396</guid>
		<description>Andrew Ross Sorkin says &quot;Bill Miller.  Bill Miller.  Bill Miller.  Blah Blah Blah.&quot; 

What a load of crap.  

Andrew Ross Sorkin says &quot;Yak Yak Yak. Wah. Wah. Wah.&quot;

Who the frick is Andrew Ross Sorkin.

Jeeze.  Charlie Rose show looks like a morgue.  Good thing Arrington didn&#039;t go there.  Otherwise he might have caught ebola virus or something contageous at PBS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew Ross Sorkin says &#8220;Bill Miller.  Bill Miller.  Bill Miller.  Blah Blah Blah.&#8221; </p>
<p>What a load of crap.  </p>
<p>Andrew Ross Sorkin says &#8220;Yak Yak Yak. Wah. Wah. Wah.&#8221;</p>
<p>Who the frick is Andrew Ross Sorkin.</p>
<p>Jeeze.  Charlie Rose show looks like a morgue.  Good thing Arrington didn&#8217;t go there.  Otherwise he might have caught ebola virus or something contageous at PBS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Campbell</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/06/arrington-and-ross-sorkin-talk-about-yahoo-on-charlie-rose/comment-page-1/#comment-2281074</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 14:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/06/arrington-and-ross-sorkin-talk-about-yahoo-on-charlie-rose/#comment-2281074</guid>
		<description>My &quot;corporations experience with Twitter is irrelevant?&quot; I would hardly call the ability to reach thought leaders and decision makers in my market irrelevant. The only thing that&#039;s irrelevant is your argument that, &quot;Search is not quickly becoming secondary to anything.&quot; Search is becoming secondary to social networks in many markets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My &#8220;corporations experience with Twitter is irrelevant?&#8221; I would hardly call the ability to reach thought leaders and decision makers in my market irrelevant. The only thing that&#8217;s irrelevant is your argument that, &#8220;Search is not quickly becoming secondary to anything.&#8221; Search is becoming secondary to social networks in many markets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy Huang</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/06/arrington-and-ross-sorkin-talk-about-yahoo-on-charlie-rose/comment-page-1/#comment-2279180</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy Huang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 04:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/06/arrington-and-ross-sorkin-talk-about-yahoo-on-charlie-rose/#comment-2279180</guid>
		<description>@Brian LOL &quot;infighting, factions and a mysterious beast&quot; yea it&#039;s hard to read the label when you are the can. You are obviously a master debater and love to do it every day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Brian LOL &#8220;infighting, factions and a mysterious beast&#8221; yea it&#8217;s hard to read the label when you are the can. You are obviously a master debater and love to do it every day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jf</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/06/arrington-and-ross-sorkin-talk-about-yahoo-on-charlie-rose/comment-page-1/#comment-2278836</link>
		<dc:creator>jf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 02:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/06/arrington-and-ross-sorkin-talk-about-yahoo-on-charlie-rose/#comment-2278836</guid>
		<description>Can I ask a dumb question? What does it mean that more than 100% of Microsoft&#039;s profits are tied up in Windows &amp; Office?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I ask a dumb question? What does it mean that more than 100% of Microsoft&#8217;s profits are tied up in Windows &amp; Office?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bambooo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/06/arrington-and-ross-sorkin-talk-about-yahoo-on-charlie-rose/comment-page-1/#comment-2278819</link>
		<dc:creator>bambooo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 02:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/06/arrington-and-ross-sorkin-talk-about-yahoo-on-charlie-rose/#comment-2278819</guid>
		<description>Yahooooooooooooooooooooooooooo is a great Company.......................................................... Good Luck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahooooooooooooooooooooooooooo is a great Company&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;. Good Luck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hendra</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/06/arrington-and-ross-sorkin-talk-about-yahoo-on-charlie-rose/comment-page-1/#comment-2278688</link>
		<dc:creator>Hendra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 01:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/06/arrington-and-ross-sorkin-talk-about-yahoo-on-charlie-rose/#comment-2278688</guid>
		<description>Is Arrington a big fan of Microsoft?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Arrington a big fan of Microsoft?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chance</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/06/arrington-and-ross-sorkin-talk-about-yahoo-on-charlie-rose/comment-page-1/#comment-2278619</link>
		<dc:creator>chance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 01:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/06/arrington-and-ross-sorkin-talk-about-yahoo-on-charlie-rose/#comment-2278619</guid>
		<description>If Yahoo or MSN really wants to be a search company - then they should just white out their home page and put a single search bar like Google.  

Everything else is just a distraction to the branding of search and on Yahoo - people ready sports, finances, news, but don&#039;t search.  On Google, there is nothing to do but search.  Of course, if Yahoo abandons the content and goes only with search, the users might go away also.  In the 90&#039;s Yahoo was the web directory for everything.  

If yahoo really wants to lead in Search, it has to Brand an independent venture as its Search Engine, Genie, wizard, etc.  Otherwise, consumers will not know they are supposed to equate Yahoo = search.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Yahoo or MSN really wants to be a search company &#8211; then they should just white out their home page and put a single search bar like Google.  </p>
<p>Everything else is just a distraction to the branding of search and on Yahoo &#8211; people ready sports, finances, news, but don&#8217;t search.  On Google, there is nothing to do but search.  Of course, if Yahoo abandons the content and goes only with search, the users might go away also.  In the 90&#8217;s Yahoo was the web directory for everything.  </p>
<p>If yahoo really wants to lead in Search, it has to Brand an independent venture as its Search Engine, Genie, wizard, etc.  Otherwise, consumers will not know they are supposed to equate Yahoo = search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bambooo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/06/arrington-and-ross-sorkin-talk-about-yahoo-on-charlie-rose/comment-page-1/#comment-2278604</link>
		<dc:creator>bambooo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 01:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/06/arrington-and-ross-sorkin-talk-about-yahoo-on-charlie-rose/#comment-2278604</guid>
		<description>tc .....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tc &#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Mingus</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/06/arrington-and-ross-sorkin-talk-about-yahoo-on-charlie-rose/comment-page-1/#comment-2278513</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Mingus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 01:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/06/arrington-and-ross-sorkin-talk-about-yahoo-on-charlie-rose/#comment-2278513</guid>
		<description>@Amy Huang, right, just without the plane crash, deserted island, all of which is on fire, cold blooded murder, infighting, factions and a mysterious beast. Good analogy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Amy Huang, right, just without the plane crash, deserted island, all of which is on fire, cold blooded murder, infighting, factions and a mysterious beast. Good analogy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy Huang</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/06/arrington-and-ross-sorkin-talk-about-yahoo-on-charlie-rose/comment-page-1/#comment-2278491</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy Huang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 00:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/06/arrington-and-ross-sorkin-talk-about-yahoo-on-charlie-rose/#comment-2278491</guid>
		<description>@Brian Sounds like someone needs a hobby. Looks like Lord of the Flies mentality around here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Brian Sounds like someone needs a hobby. Looks like Lord of the Flies mentality around here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Mingus</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/06/arrington-and-ross-sorkin-talk-about-yahoo-on-charlie-rose/comment-page-1/#comment-2278449</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Mingus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 00:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/06/arrington-and-ross-sorkin-talk-about-yahoo-on-charlie-rose/#comment-2278449</guid>
		<description>@Michael Campbell

Your &quot;corporation&#039;s&quot; experience with twitter is irrelevant. 

MonthlyTweets = 12,000,000  // Tweet Scan
MonthlySearches = 61,000,000,000 // comScore

MonthlyTweets*x = MonthlySearches
x ~= 5,000

Move along now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Michael Campbell</p>
<p>Your &#8220;corporation&#8217;s&#8221; experience with twitter is irrelevant. </p>
<p>MonthlyTweets = 12,000,000  // Tweet Scan<br />
MonthlySearches = 61,000,000,000 // comScore</p>
<p>MonthlyTweets*x = MonthlySearches<br />
x ~= 5,000</p>
<p>Move along now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peteski</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/06/arrington-and-ross-sorkin-talk-about-yahoo-on-charlie-rose/comment-page-1/#comment-2278411</link>
		<dc:creator>Peteski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 00:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/06/arrington-and-ross-sorkin-talk-about-yahoo-on-charlie-rose/#comment-2278411</guid>
		<description>You have to stop letting Enzo cut your hair, try Gino - he&#039;s the best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have to stop letting Enzo cut your hair, try Gino &#8211; he&#8217;s the best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Campbell</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/06/arrington-and-ross-sorkin-talk-about-yahoo-on-charlie-rose/comment-page-1/#comment-2278378</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 00:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/06/arrington-and-ross-sorkin-talk-about-yahoo-on-charlie-rose/#comment-2278378</guid>
		<description>Twitter is a broadcast medium, plain and simple. Some early adopters have 15,000 followers. I doubt if any of them &quot;HAVE TO&quot; search for anything ever again.

I am #1 on Google, MSN and Yahoo for my target keywords. Google is hanging in at my #1 traffic source, but Yahoo is #6 and MSN #7 in terms of traffic, behind PRWeb #2, iTunes #3, StumbleUpon #4 and Twitter #5.

So in reply to @Brian (who seems to have lots of time to comment, leaving 6 of 19 here so far) it&#039;s not just my &quot;personal experience&quot; from Twitter, its hard data, stats collected last month, from sites that my corporation operates.

People can live in the &quot;Google&quot; world as long as they want, with its 2001 search technology. But future traffic (people under 30) lies in (dare I say it) Web 2.0 properties with its social WOM (word of mouth) marketing.

Change happens. Search and its effectiveness have declined. When it comes to getting traffic and paying customers, search has become secondary in many markets. It&#039;s no longer effective at getting the word out and takes too long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter is a broadcast medium, plain and simple. Some early adopters have 15,000 followers. I doubt if any of them &#8220;HAVE TO&#8221; search for anything ever again.</p>
<p>I am #1 on Google, MSN and Yahoo for my target keywords. Google is hanging in at my #1 traffic source, but Yahoo is #6 and MSN #7 in terms of traffic, behind PRWeb #2, iTunes #3, StumbleUpon #4 and Twitter #5.</p>
<p>So in reply to @Brian (who seems to have lots of time to comment, leaving 6 of 19 here so far) it&#8217;s not just my &#8220;personal experience&#8221; from Twitter, its hard data, stats collected last month, from sites that my corporation operates.</p>
<p>People can live in the &#8220;Google&#8221; world as long as they want, with its 2001 search technology. But future traffic (people under 30) lies in (dare I say it) Web 2.0 properties with its social WOM (word of mouth) marketing.</p>
<p>Change happens. Search and its effectiveness have declined. When it comes to getting traffic and paying customers, search has become secondary in many markets. It&#8217;s no longer effective at getting the word out and takes too long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Mingus</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/06/arrington-and-ross-sorkin-talk-about-yahoo-on-charlie-rose/comment-page-1/#comment-2278300</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Mingus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 00:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/06/arrington-and-ross-sorkin-talk-about-yahoo-on-charlie-rose/#comment-2278300</guid>
		<description>@qthrul, I just checked out Cranky Geeks. There&#039;s only one problem with that site. Its name is John Dvorak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@qthrul, I just checked out Cranky Geeks. There&#8217;s only one problem with that site. Its name is John Dvorak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: antje wilsch</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/06/arrington-and-ross-sorkin-talk-about-yahoo-on-charlie-rose/comment-page-1/#comment-2278284</link>
		<dc:creator>antje wilsch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 00:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/06/arrington-and-ross-sorkin-talk-about-yahoo-on-charlie-rose/#comment-2278284</guid>
		<description>I thought Aaron was older than that... geesh he looks like a young&#039;un (and hate that he said &quot;a advertising xxx&quot; it&#039;s like nails on a chalkboard... (picky picky). &quot;
Mike, like the pen touch :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Aaron was older than that&#8230; geesh he looks like a young&#8217;un (and hate that he said &#8220;a advertising xxx&#8221; it&#8217;s like nails on a chalkboard&#8230; (picky picky). &#8221;<br />
Mike, like the pen touch <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Mingus</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/06/arrington-and-ross-sorkin-talk-about-yahoo-on-charlie-rose/comment-page-1/#comment-2278276</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Mingus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 00:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/06/arrington-and-ross-sorkin-talk-about-yahoo-on-charlie-rose/#comment-2278276</guid>
		<description>@qthrul, I can see that. I&#039;d like to see a bloggingheads.tv version of the Gillmore Gang chats, which I think might be similar to what your suggesting, although not sure about the crossfire format. Occasionally completely ludicrous comments creep  in there. I think most of them would be avoided if they were all on camera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@qthrul, I can see that. I&#8217;d like to see a bloggingheads.tv version of the Gillmore Gang chats, which I think might be similar to what your suggesting, although not sure about the crossfire format. Occasionally completely ludicrous comments creep  in there. I think most of them would be avoided if they were all on camera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techcrunch attack health care!!</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/06/arrington-and-ross-sorkin-talk-about-yahoo-on-charlie-rose/comment-page-1/#comment-2278268</link>
		<dc:creator>Techcrunch attack health care!!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 00:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/06/arrington-and-ross-sorkin-talk-about-yahoo-on-charlie-rose/#comment-2278268</guid>
		<description>We need to protest against the government for giving too much  healthcare access for seniors &amp; upper class seniors. They always get everything they want.

http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&amp;tab=wn&amp;ned=us&amp;q=healthcare&amp;btnG=Search

Every seniors who frought WW2, Vetinam wars, etc... They all give us too much trouble for younger generation.  War on terrorism, 9/11, everything is brainwashing.   We want higher budget cuts on healthcare!

People today, they can&#039;t even afford anything... minnesota electric, oil, and whole thing is turning upside down.


Techcrunch Go attack Healthcare plan!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We need to protest against the government for giving too much  healthcare access for seniors &amp; upper class seniors. They always get everything they want.</p>
<p><a href="http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&amp;tab=wn&amp;ned=us&amp;q=healthcare&amp;btnG=Search" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&amp;tab=wn&amp;ned=us&amp;q=healthcare&amp;btnG=Search'>http://news.goo...amp;btnG=Search</a></p>
<p>Every seniors who frought WW2, Vetinam wars, etc&#8230; They all give us too much trouble for younger generation.  War on terrorism, 9/11, everything is brainwashing.   We want higher budget cuts on healthcare!</p>
<p>People today, they can&#8217;t even afford anything&#8230; minnesota electric, oil, and whole thing is turning upside down.</p>
<p>Techcrunch Go attack Healthcare plan!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay (Twitter @qthrul)</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/06/arrington-and-ross-sorkin-talk-about-yahoo-on-charlie-rose/comment-page-1/#comment-2278222</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay (Twitter @qthrul)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 23:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/06/arrington-and-ross-sorkin-talk-about-yahoo-on-charlie-rose/#comment-2278222</guid>
		<description>@Brian Mingus - Okay, so cycle out the Andrew seat periodically.  It could be like Cranky Geeks end of the table seat... only more relevant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Brian Mingus &#8211; Okay, so cycle out the Andrew seat periodically.  It could be like Cranky Geeks end of the table seat&#8230; only more relevant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Mingus</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/06/arrington-and-ross-sorkin-talk-about-yahoo-on-charlie-rose/comment-page-1/#comment-2278217</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Mingus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 23:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/06/arrington-and-ross-sorkin-talk-about-yahoo-on-charlie-rose/#comment-2278217</guid>
		<description>@ previous poster

This blog is about economics. It&#039;s run by a freaking economist for crying out loud.

My tolerance for some of the comments around here is shrinking. I should stop reading them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ previous poster</p>
<p>This blog is about economics. It&#8217;s run by a freaking economist for crying out loud.</p>
<p>My tolerance for some of the comments around here is shrinking. I should stop reading them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Please budget Cut on healthcare</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/06/arrington-and-ross-sorkin-talk-about-yahoo-on-charlie-rose/comment-page-1/#comment-2278182</link>
		<dc:creator>Please budget Cut on healthcare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 23:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/06/arrington-and-ross-sorkin-talk-about-yahoo-on-charlie-rose/#comment-2278182</guid>
		<description>Who cares...  It&#039;s worthless talking trash. Why can&#039;t mike talk about economy and inflation?

I think we could save the economy... If we have huge budget cuts on  healthcare for retired executives, seniors &amp; upper class seniors. This means we can save billion dollars on food crisis, oil,  college education, and other mortgage crisis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who cares&#8230;  It&#8217;s worthless talking trash. Why can&#8217;t mike talk about economy and inflation?</p>
<p>I think we could save the economy&#8230; If we have huge budget cuts on  healthcare for retired executives, seniors &amp; upper class seniors. This means we can save billion dollars on food crisis, oil,  college education, and other mortgage crisis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Mingus</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/06/arrington-and-ross-sorkin-talk-about-yahoo-on-charlie-rose/comment-page-1/#comment-2278147</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Mingus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 23:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/06/arrington-and-ross-sorkin-talk-about-yahoo-on-charlie-rose/#comment-2278147</guid>
		<description>@Michael Campbell

Your personal experience with twitter is irrelevant. Search is not quickly becoming secondary to anything.

Duh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Michael Campbell</p>
<p>Your personal experience with twitter is irrelevant. Search is not quickly becoming secondary to anything.</p>
<p>Duh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Gardiner</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/06/arrington-and-ross-sorkin-talk-about-yahoo-on-charlie-rose/comment-page-1/#comment-2278140</link>
		<dc:creator>James Gardiner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 23:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/06/arrington-and-ross-sorkin-talk-about-yahoo-on-charlie-rose/#comment-2278140</guid>
		<description>Wow Mike, good overview at the end.
Exactly what I see happening.
Strange how its hard to get  precise and brief description like yours on the web.

I personally still think it will happen (70%), but lower then $30 now.

Microsoft will make Yahoo board pay for letting Yang pull what he did.

This may take 3 months however.

30%, they just go out any by page views..

James</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow Mike, good overview at the end.<br />
Exactly what I see happening.<br />
Strange how its hard to get  precise and brief description like yours on the web.</p>
<p>I personally still think it will happen (70%), but lower then $30 now.</p>
<p>Microsoft will make Yahoo board pay for letting Yang pull what he did.</p>
<p>This may take 3 months however.</p>
<p>30%, they just go out any by page views..</p>
<p>James</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Campbell</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/06/arrington-and-ross-sorkin-talk-about-yahoo-on-charlie-rose/comment-page-1/#comment-2278132</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 23:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/06/arrington-and-ross-sorkin-talk-about-yahoo-on-charlie-rose/#comment-2278132</guid>
		<description>I agree with Jay Neely&#039;s comment that search is quickly becoming secondary. I&#039;m more likely to broadcast a tweet on Twitter, and get the opinions of people I trust, instead of relying on a search engine, that constantly gets gamed by people in the SEO business.

The search engines are advertising companies now. Google is a verb. Yahoo is still a portal. MSN is a software company that has no memorable online branding.

The take away lesson in all this, are the new kids on the block, like Twitter, StumbleUpon, Facebook, et al. If I was Google, Yahoo, or MSN, I&#039;d be looking to them for the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Jay Neely&#8217;s comment that search is quickly becoming secondary. I&#8217;m more likely to broadcast a tweet on Twitter, and get the opinions of people I trust, instead of relying on a search engine, that constantly gets gamed by people in the SEO business.</p>
<p>The search engines are advertising companies now. Google is a verb. Yahoo is still a portal. MSN is a software company that has no memorable online branding.</p>
<p>The take away lesson in all this, are the new kids on the block, like Twitter, StumbleUpon, Facebook, et al. If I was Google, Yahoo, or MSN, I&#8217;d be looking to them for the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Mingus</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/06/arrington-and-ross-sorkin-talk-about-yahoo-on-charlie-rose/comment-page-1/#comment-2278122</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Mingus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 23:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/06/arrington-and-ross-sorkin-talk-about-yahoo-on-charlie-rose/#comment-2278122</guid>
		<description>@qthrul, I doubt it. Michael would own Andrew. Andrew got all of his talking points either from this blog, or out of his arse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@qthrul, I doubt it. Michael would own Andrew. Andrew got all of his talking points either from this blog, or out of his arse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sea</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/06/arrington-and-ross-sorkin-talk-about-yahoo-on-charlie-rose/comment-page-1/#comment-2278110</link>
		<dc:creator>sea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 23:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/06/arrington-and-ross-sorkin-talk-about-yahoo-on-charlie-rose/#comment-2278110</guid>
		<description>haven&#039;t finish yet, there may be still opportunity for Microsoft.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haven&#8217;t finish yet, there may be still opportunity for Microsoft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
