May 3, 2008

Breaking: Microsoft Withdraws Yahoo Bid; Walks Away From Deal (Updated)

Michael Arrington

161 comments »

Microsoft will announce shortly that they have withdrawn their offer to acquire Yahoo. Talks between the two companies and their advisors broke down earlier today, according to a source close to Microsoft, after a failure to come to agreement on price and other terms.

A final meeting occurred today at Microsoft headquarters in Redmond, between Jerry Yang and David Filo from Yahoo, and Kevin Johnson and Steve Ballmer from Microsoft. At that meeting, Yahoo said the lowest price they could accept was $37/share. Microsoft reportedly went as high as $33/share. Yang and Filo returned to California shortly after the meeting, and Yang then had a subsequent phone conversation with Ballmer. At that time Ballmer withdrew the offer.

Other facts are emerging around recent negotiations between the companies. A rough timeline:

  • No meaningful talks occured between the companies until after Microsoft sent a letter to Yahoo on April 5 with a three week deadline to complete a deal.
  • On April 15, execs from both companies met in Portland, Oregon to discuss valuation and integration issues.
  • Following that April 15 meeting both sides signed a non disclosure agreement not to discuss any negotiations until after the April 26 deadline that Microsoft set in their April 5 letter.

  • On April 18, Microsoft and Yahoo advisors had a phone conversation; Yahoo signaled a minimum price of $40/share.
  • On April 29, there were multiple phone conversations between the companies; Yahoo supposedly said they would be willing to move from the $40 price and requested that Microsoft not go hostile or walk from the deal.
  • On April 30 the teams met in California. Yahoo said $38 gets the deal done.

Microsoft is making it clear that this is not just a breakdown in discussions between the companies. They are withdrawing their earlier bid and are saying they will not go hostile. They’re walking away cleanly from the deal.


Update: Press Release:

Microsoft Withdraws Proposal to Acquire Yahoo!

REDMOND, Wash., May 3 — Microsoft Corp. (Nasdaq: MSFT) today announced that it has withdrawn its proposal to acquire Yahoo! Inc. (Nasdaq: YHOO).

“We continue to believe that our proposed acquisition made sense for Microsoft, Yahoo! and the market as a whole. Our goal in pursuing a combination with Yahoo! was to provide greater choice and innovation in the marketplace and create real value for our respective stockholders and employees,” said Steve Ballmer, chief executive officer of Microsoft.

“Despite our best efforts, including raising our bid by roughly $5 billion, Yahoo! has not moved toward accepting our offer. After careful consideration, we believe the economics demanded by Yahoo! do not make sense for us, and it is in the best interests of Microsoft stockholders, employees and other stakeholders to withdraw our proposal,” said Ballmer.

“We have a talented team in place and a compelling plan to grow our business through innovative new services and strategic transactions with other business partners. While Yahoo! would have accelerated our strategy, I am confident that we can continue to move forward toward our goals,” Ballmer said.

“We are investing heavily in new tools and Web experiences, we have dramatically improved our search performance and advertiser satisfaction, and we will continue to build our scale through organic growth and partnerships,” said Kevin Johnson, Microsoft president for platforms and services.

Update: Letter From Ballmer To Yang

Below is the text of the letter from Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer to Yahoo
CEO Jerry Yang.

May 3, 2008

Mr. Jerry Yang
CEO and Chief Yahoo
Yahoo! Inc.
701 First Avenue
Sunnyvale, CA 94089

Dear Jerry:

After over three months, we have reached the conclusion of the process regarding a possible combination of Microsoft and Yahoo!.

I first want to convey my personal thanks to you, your management team, and Yahoo!’s Board of Directors for your consideration of our proposal. I appreciate the time and attention all of you have given to this matter, and I especially appreciate the time that you have invested personally. I feel that our discussions this week have been particularly useful, providing me for the first time with real clarity on what is and is not possible.

I am disappointed that Yahoo! has not moved towards accepting our offer. I first called you with our offer on January 31 because I believed that a combination of our two companies would have created real value for our respective shareholders and would have provided consumers, publishers, and advertisers with greater innovation and choice in the marketplace. Our
decision to offer a 62 percent premium at that time reflected the strength of these convictions.

In our conversations this week, we conveyed our willingness to raise our offer to $33.00 per share, reflecting again our belief in this collective opportunity. This increase would have added approximately another $5 billion of value to your shareholders, compared to the current value of our initial offer. It also would have reflected a premium of over 70 percent compared to the price at which your stock closed on January 31. Yet it has proven insufficient, as your final position insisted on
Microsoft paying yet another $5 billion or more, or at least another $4 per share above our $33.00 offer.

Also, after giving this week’s conversations further thought, it is clear to me that it is not sensible for Microsoft to take our offer directly to your shareholders. This approach would necessarily involve a protracted proxy contest and eventually an exchange offer. Our discussions with you have led us to conclude that, in the interim, you would take steps
that would make Yahoo! undesirable as an acquisition for Microsoft.

We regard with particular concern your apparent planning to respond to a “hostile” bid by pursuing a new arrangement that would involve or lead to the outsourcing to Google of key paid Internet search terms offered by Yahoo! today. In our view, such an arrangement with the dominant search provider would make an acquisition of Yahoo! undesirable to us for a number
of reasons:

— First, it would fundamentally undermine Yahoo!’s own strategy and
long-term viability by encouraging advertisers to use Google as opposed
to your Panama paid search system. This would also fragment your
search advertising and display advertising strategies and the ecosystem
surrounding them. This would undermine the reliance on your display
advertising business to fuel future growth.

— Given this, it would impair Yahoo’s ability to retain the talented
engineers working on advertising systems that are important to our
interest in a combination of our companies.

— In addition, it would raise a host of regulatory and legal problems
that no acquirer, including Microsoft, would want to inherit. Among
other things, this would consolidate market share with the
already-dominant paid search provider in a manner that would reduce
competition and choice in the marketplace.

— This would also effectively enable Google to set the prices for key
search terms on both their and your search platforms and, in the
process, raise prices charged to advertisers on Yahoo. In addition to
whatever resulting legal problems, this seems unwise from a business
perspective unless in fact one simply wishes to use this as a vehicle
to exit the paid search business in favor of Google.

— It could foreclose any chance of a combination with any other search
provider that is not already relying on Google’s search services.

Accordingly, your apparent plan to pursue such an arrangement in the event of a proxy contest or exchange offer leads me to the firm decision not to pursue such a path. Instead, I hereby formally withdraw Microsoft’s proposal to acquire Yahoo!.

We will move forward and will continue to innovate and grow our business at Microsoft with the talented team we have in place and potentially through strategic transactions with other business partners.

I still believe even today that our offer remains the only alternative put forward that provides your stockholders full and fair value for their shares. By failing to reach an agreement with us, you and your stockholders have left significant value on the table.

But clearly a deal is not to be.

Thank you again for the time we have spent together discussing this.

Sincerely yours,
/s/ Steven A. Ballmer

Steven A. Ballmer
Chief Executive Officer
Microsoft Corporation

Update: Email From Steve Ballmer To All Microsoft Employees

See here for text of email from Steve Ballmer to all Microsoft employees.

Update: Yahoo Responds

Yahoo was definitely slow to the trigger today with a public statement, but they have now issued a press release regarding the withdrawal of Microsoft’s offer.

  • Sphere It

Trackbacks/Pings (Trackback URL)

  1. Hot Cross Bunzo
  2. jarkolicious :: Microsoft Walks Away From Yahoo! Acquisition
  3. Microsoft: Asta la vista Yahoo!
  4. Microsoft and Yahoo - Deal Over - Left The Box.com
  5. adventureran warped
  6. Microsoft Withdraws Bid for Yahoo « Cindy’s Take on Tech
  7. Email From Steve Ballmer To All Microsoft Employees
  8. Let’s Get the (Yahoo-Microsoft Blogging Party) Started | Mark Evans
  9. latechna Blog » Blog Archive » Microsoft Yahoo deal… Down the drain
  10. Yahoo sagt Nein zu Microsoft. @ zeptR
  11. Se acabó: Microsoft retira su oferta por Yahoo! - FayerWayer
  12. pligg.com
  13. Yahoo’s Tough Week Ahead
  14. Microsoft dice: me aburr, no quiero comprar Yahoo - Foros de CHW
  15. Microsoft/Yahoo: Summary Of News & Bonus Gillmor Gang
  16. Microsoft no pudo comprar a Yahoo! « Gabuntu
  17. HyperLink, un blog de Poza Rica| Por que la noticia es relativa — Microsoft retira ofertas para comprar a Yahoo!
  18. Microdobe? : Matt’s Homepage
  19. Microsoft-Yahoo Deals Closed
  20. Microsoft & Yahoo!, the story ends! | zero.gr
  21. Blog-opsamling | Overskrifts underskrift
  22. Bitácora [im]personal de Pepe Flores » Blog Archive » Links del día [04/05]
  23. What Now Yahoo? And What Now Microsoft? It’s Pretty Clear What Now Google… « SmoothSpan Blog
  24. Rodrigo Miranda Hablando de Pasiones » Temas interesantes
  25. racetalkblog.com » RIP MicroHoo!: Yang & Board High-Five as Stock Nosedives
  26. The Declining Value Of Redundant News Content On The Web - Publishing 2.0
  27. WebmasterRadio.FM Coverage of the Microsoft / Yahoo! (non?) Merger | WebmasterRadio.FM Blog
  28. Link Bundle - May 7 | franzone.com

Comments

RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. Shafqat

    Well done TC. First to the news….

  2. lawrence

    WOW

  3. Shaun

    Thank God.

  4. bavb

    Yaaaaaay! I’m happy.

  5. Adam Robertson

    Great Michael! Thanks for alerting us!

  6. Jeff Brewster

    Now we can all move on to more important things, like why Youtube was down this morning.

  7. bob cobb

    damn

  8. Andy Gongea

    Bad news
    Anyway, with all that money and a web approach they can make something. Kudos for the try. No back to work and buy some niche companies.

  9. Michael Leigeber

    I wonder who they will be looking at next? Ballmer mentioned that they have other companies to look at if the Yahoo! deal fell through.

  10. Timothy Sykes

    awesome, good BN

  11. Shawn Farner

    Awesome! I hope Yahoo learned a lesson from all this, and I hope they keep their newly-found desire to innovate alive.

  12. Sebastien

    That doesn’t mean they Microsoft is giving Yahoo up. They’re probably gonna go hostile now! Yeah!!!!

    @6- you serious? You really think the youtube outage is more important??!!! Microsoft buying Yahoo is probably the best thing that could happen to the Internet. It’s time Google get some real competition and stop dominating the market!

  13. Frog29

    Yay!

  14. CBass

    Good for Microsoft. Bad for Yahoo.

  15. Jeff Brewster

    @11: Millions of us missed out on our Saturday mornings full of idiots breaking stuff, Britney-wannabes and Rickrolls. Sounds like you need to question your priorities :)

  16. Judson

    *ahem* mike, it’s no longer a slow news day. :D

    good job on the scoop techcrunch, that’s why we read.

  17. Ontario Emperor

    Waiting for more details. One person surmised that Microsoft was walking away completely, but this isn’t obvious at this time.

    (Heard about your post from Steven Hodson, by the way.)

  18. AJ Arora

    I give it 6 days until serious Google partnership talks begin.

  19. Gustavo Cardoso

    I hope Yahoo board know what they are doing… thats not how negotiations should go!

  20. Leon

    Maybe it’s because of Google stepping in to save Yahoo!’s behind. I’d rather see a buyout from them than Microsoft.

  21. One guy's perspective

    A bad move by Yahoo. This near-death experience will not change the fact that the company long ago lost their edge and best talent or suddenly turn it into a high-growth company in a way that would support a valuation equivalent to what MSFT was willing to pay. Desire does not magically confer ability. If you haven’t sold yet…

  22. Ron

    Oooops, I hope this means a hostile takeover battle is coming.
    1. I want this to happen, kick some Google butt maybe
    2. This is the kind of a fun fight, lawyers sucking millions, injunctions flying all
    over the place, press releases, some nasty emails popping out, real fun

    Let the games begin

  23. Dan

    MS threw Apple a lifeline when they needed it the most in order to keep alive a weak competitor for anti-trust reasons. Google I’m sure will do the same with Yahoo. But I wouldn’t count Yahoo out just yet…

  24. christopher

    this is likely not over. msft will wait one quarter. yahoo will disappoint. and msft will enter with a lower bid.

  25. magnusdopus

    Microsoft may now go after AOL or Valueclick if they really want to own the display advertising market.

  26. Vinay

    Steve Ballmer’s Good Bye for Jerry Yang !! Finally! :)

  27. Peter Cooper

    Google and Yahoo need to partner again like they did in the old days. It’s pretty simple. Google runs the search (as was the case 7 - 8 years ago) for Yahoo, gives Yahoo lots of money each year (rather than the other way round as it was), and Yahoo focuses on what it’s good at.. running online media properties and selling advertising on said properties.

    It’s all about comparative advantage. Google is good at running search and search advertising; Yahoo is good at running online media properties and selling advertising on them. They both focus on their strengths; everyone wins.

  28. Spencer

    The Press Release:

    http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-.....&EDATE

  29. nobosh.com

    @christopher wrong you need approval to make acquisitions of this size.

  30. Tech Blog

    Huh? So two real options, get the deal done or go hostile. Now Microsoft is back where they were in January? Are there other companies that Microsoft can go after? I am not sure they can just grow their business to compete online with Google let alone Yahoo.

    I bet something interesting happens this coming week in tech aquisitions

  31. Vinay

    @27 .. the link is already in the post along with the text in the letter!

  32. jamboree

    Yang is as dumb as a doorknob. Google is the enemy here. Not Microsoft.

  33. Kstraw

    who does this hurt worse? On so many fronts….

  34. Chris W.

    This should be a Made-For-Tv tech soap opera.

  35. Frank E

    Not good news for us search marketers.

  36. adam jackson

    Thank god that’s over.

  37. christopher

    @nobosh.com - what are you talking about? ballmer couldn’t get board approval for a $40B acquisition one quarter after it got approval for a $44.6B acquisition? come on, this letter clearly signals that Yahoo shareholders need to force the board not to partner with goog on paid-search in order to remain viable for acquisition at a later date.

  38. kevin

    Wow, as was said above, good for Microsoft, not so much for Yahoo.

    Microsoft has plenty of other smaller companies that they can buy to get the same benefits without the baggage that would have come with Yahoo.

    Yahoo, however, seems to be rather screwed. They are already getting pounded by Google and while Google will likely work to help keep them around I think that their time as a major player may be done.

  39. browse

    while im glad yahoo! didn’t get eaten, Ballmer is grinning through his teeth in that letter: “We’re still right. You guys will crash and burn. Your shareholders will raise hell. And on that day, you’ll be ours for a fraction of this offer.”

  40. CodeBoss

    A very interesting side to this story is that TechCrunch beat the NY Times and WSJ to the story by a minute and with more details… very connected, very cool.

  41. Darnell Clayton

    Sweet! This just made my day!

    Unless your a Yahoo! stockholder, this is good news for everyone!

    PS

    For everyone expecting Microsoft to go hostile, read the following update:

    We regard with particular concern your apparent planning to respond to a “hostile” bid by pursuing a new arrangement that would involve or lead to the outsourcing to Google of key paid Internet search terms offered by Yahoo! today. In our view, such an arrangement with the dominant search provider would make an acquisition of Yahoo! undesirable to us for a number of reasons:

    This Yahoo! love affair is now officially over. While I await the Yahoo! lawsuits to begin, it is clear the Microsoft will have to gain search engine market share the old fashioned way–by earning it.

    ~Darnell

  42. Nava Bromberger

    Yang is an idiot and I hope Microsoft does go hostile just to kick his ass. I’m not a Microsoft fan but Steve Ballmer’s letter was spot on.

  43. Andrew Cafourek

    MicroWho?

  44. Psiplex

    TC first with the scoop! Nice work and what a relief that it is over. Counting on TechCrunch to deliver the next chapter in the saga.

  45. griffin

    so disappointed with yahoo and jerry yang’s lack of vision and his complete stupidity. //g

  46. deleo

    It never seemed like a good fit to me. I could see Microsoft taking a run at AOL. AOL has a big audience and could be the same platform for Microsoft to role out its web technologies for a much lower price. I think Yahoo will get picked up by someone else that makes more sense.

  47. SsabmuD

    Some of you guys posting on here are morons and don’t have a damn clue about business. This isn’t about Microsoft being evil. Yahoo just literally signed their death sentence and in the process screwed over their shareholders. If I were a Yahoo shareholder or employee, I’d be PISSED OFF right now and looking for a new gig pronto as its only a matter of time before the pink slips start flying. On the brighter side, Microsoft comes out looking like the studs they really are. For the first time I can actually say that Steve B. just made the smartest decision of his career. Microsoft employees overwhelmingly did NOT want this acquisition to happen and they certainly did not want the company going into debt to do it. For that kind of money, Microsoft could go on an acquisition spree and buy the hottest companies on the market and expand their portfolio immensely at a fraction of the cost, not to mention they could invest heavily into their own people and really step the game up to put the final nail in Yahoo’s coffin. MSFT gave them a lifeline and like the pompous spoiled silicon valley brats that they are, they spit in their saviors face. Bad move Yahoo. Nice knowin ya…time to buy Microsoft stock baby!

  48. Carl Starrett

    Cool…now I don’t have to move my website. I cannot fathom why people thin this would have been a good move for anybody.

  49. me

    WHOHOOOOO!!!!!!! HAHAHAHA. TRY AND BE HOSTILE WITH A FRIENDLY COMPANY AND YOU WILL LOOSE. THANKS FOR THE OFFER, BUT NO THANKS. BULLY US? AND WE WILL GO TO OUR BIG BROTHER FOR HELP :)

  50. Mark Zawacki

    YHOO R.I.P.

  51. Workpost

    This is probably the best resolution for both companies. Yahoo will survive and now Microsoft can afford to buy something a little less expensive and those 20 new startups / year.

  52. Dumb & Dumber

    Yahoo has no choice but to start running Google ads pretty much everywhere now, otherwise their next quarter will be truly horrendous… Google wins.

  53. me

    MICROSOFT HAS BEEN TRYING TO BUY AOL FOR 4 YEARS. BUT AOL ALREADY MADE DEALS WITH GOOGLE. YAHOO WAS THERE ONLY NEXT APPROACH TO LEVERAGE SEARCH RESULTS. NOT GOING TO HAPPEN.

    SsabmuD IS A MORON. HOW LONG HAVE YOU HATED ON AOL ALSO? 400MIL A YEAR BUSINESS STILL GOING STRONG. AND YOU HAVE THE AUDACITY TO THINK YAHOO IS DIEING? GOOD LUCK WITH THAT..HAHAHAHAHAHA

  54. Chris

    Let the Yahoo shareholder lawsuits begin…

  55. John

    Microsoft just went HOSTILE!
    This is NOT over. This was the only way they COULD go hostile. Now they can let Yahoo shareholders be hostile for them and they don’t have to appear like the bad guys.
    This deal will get done between $33-35.
    The twists and turns have not ceased and there is not yet release.

  56. Nat

    Maybe that will be call a black Saturday for both sides..not a win/win situation

    Nat
    http://www.workersinc.com

  57. Ziad

    Winner: Google

  58. Sandeep

    Now Microsoft can put its attention to comparatively smaller acquisitions. Big beneficiaries: Digg, Facebook (and maybe AOL)

  59. Sina

    From the Microsoft Press Release:

    After careful consideration, we believe the economics demanded by Yahoo! do not make sense for us, and it is in the best interests of Microsoft stockholders, employees and other stakeholders to withdraw our proposal,’ said Balmer

    What about users of Microsoft products? No mention. A perfect example of the problem with Microsoft management.

  60. Zoul

    Yahoo will surely suffer and Google will dominate!!

  61. DvB

    Hubris can be very costly. Yahoo! played chicken, and MSFT didn’t flinch - instead, they just turned around and drove off.

    Plan B, Yahoo? Search by Google? And that leaves what? Cue up the requiem. While I’d love to see a rabbit pulled out of the hat, I fear Yahoo! has reached the final chapter…

  62. Manos

    Mike, who sent you this letter?

  63. Jay (Twitter @qthrul)

    Well, so much for getting Xbox and Flickr to play together nicely.

  64. Shannon

    I am so glad this happened. The companies were two totally different cultures. It would have never worked.

  65. DjBigDaddy

    @Deleoe might have a good idea. AOL might be a better fit for microsoft.

  66. Venkat Rao

    here come the lawsuits.

    how much is yhoo stock gonna drop on monday?? 50%?? ouch!

  67. bry

    TC - another reason why you are in my top 3 reads.

  68. sballmer's son

    So are we back at singing “developers developers developers”?

  69. Tuyen Vo

    I actually think Microsoft played this well. If they would have been able to grab Yahoo at $33, that would have been great. If they couldn’t, they would have disrupted operations at one of their biggest rivals. Think of all the talent that has left Yahoo in the last 4 months. Not just big executives but many great mid level folks, as well. Also, there was no way Yahoo could do any really big marketing/technology/etc. deals with the Microsoft cloud hanging over them. I think Yahoo’s stock will dip and Microsoft will eventually buy them for the original price (if not lower).

  70. RIAA

    shannon, cultures dont matter in this type of offer. This is an ACQUISITION, not a merger. Yahoo was just going to be a marketshare addition to Microsoft, thats it. Who gives a fuck about the cultures when you get 20% added to your search engine marketshare

  71. Chris

    Steve Ballmer is a big ape. He makes decisions with his primate instinct alone. Any other person could have completed this deal.

  72. Ryan MF

    Great.

    Now where’s my Delicious 2?

  73. nitsuj

    Hmm…I guess fiduciary responsibility is fidouchebaggery to Yahoo. At least Yahoo continues to prove that while Semel was an idiot there are bigger idiots out there…and apparently they are all at Yahoo.

    Will be interesting to see the shareholder lawsuits. I think Ballmer’s letter points out quite a few areas where the board wasn’t looking out for the good of the shareholders - 70% premium, poison pills, etc.

  74. Chris

    wow

  75. Arin Sarkssian

    Hmmm, maybe ill pay my Yahoo Mail Plus bill now.

    wow. im pretty shocked but I gotta say i’m excited that my beloved yahoo mail isnt gonna turn into Yahoo HotMail Live XP SP5

  76. Brian

    Microsoft is setting up Yahoo! to be crushed by its own shareholders in lawsuits. They leaked that letter specifically to show shareholders that Yahoo management is not acting in their best interests.

    At the very least, expect a whole new management team at Yahoo.

    Microsoft will be able to buy them next year for less than they offered this year, if they still want them.

  77. Jimmy Dell

    The funny thing is going to be when Jerry calls Schmidt this week to work that “great” partnership and Schmidt laughs in his face… pwned

  78. Syed

    What a loss. I sincerely believed that Yahoo and MS merger would have ultimately challenged Google and this in turn would have made search even better. But oh well. I think Yahoo is the clear loser in this case

  79. Dom

    There is absolutely no way this will go hostile.

    MS knows that if it did, half the Yahoo staff (the talented half) would walk out overnight. There are many Y! staff who simply don’t want to work for MS as a matter of principal - and going hostile would simple aggravate that.

  80. YouYap.com

    They will be back

  81. James Gardiner

    It is easy to see that Steve wrote what he did in his letter to make sure investors know just how F-ed Up the Yahoo board have been.

    Making a final attempt and rising the bid makes the Yahoo board look like children.

    Yahoo shares will dive below the value from before the bid… Because of the reasons Steve Baller mentions and because the board is not acting in the best interest of the shareholders.

    And with all the poison pills left like a cancer in Yahoo.

    Can share holders sue the board?? The first thing that would be on my mind if I was a shareholder.

    This big issue here is what will fill the vacuum that Yahoo leaves behind.

    I still feel Microsoft will come in and take over the scorched earth.

    But the biggest worry is Google filling the vacuum and becoming even more dominant. This why Microsoft would not have wanted this to happen, and by the looks of it, tried hard and made a decent offer.

  82. jk

    I am shorting yhoo. it is going under 20 next week.

  83. Victor Shamanovsky

    Stick a fork in it, YHOO\Yahoo! is done.

    Here come shareholder law suits. As they should.

    $37? That is laughable. I thought $30 would be too much.

  84. Lee

    This battle is not over, those that are celebrating that Yahoo is safe, i would hold on. this is not MSFT walking away , this is MSFTpulling a tactic hostile move. MSFT is letting disgruntled shareholders and employees do their hostile bidding now (i mean ALOT of disgruntled shareholders). there are no other viable options that will give shareholders that kind of premium, not even Google.

    now enjoy the plummeting of YHOO stock….

  85. YDRIVE

    Y! will continue to impress the world, with msft, or standalone… so, that’s ok :-D

  86. Jerry Yang

    Shit.

  87. yoogle

    BREAKING NEWS :

    MSFT TO BUY MAHALO

  88. Utkarsh Sinha

    Good for MS …..

  89. Terry Semel

    Nice! Yahoo shareholders will forget all about how poorly I ran Yahoo. Jerry’s the fool now.

  90. Alamgir Kahn

    Yahoo is F’d!

    MS will go after AOL.

  91. Fun Times

    Apple is cooking something. Either yahoo, sony, nintendo, or some korean company. They have huge amounts of cash just sitting there, 18bn… I am sure they can get some financing for the $37 bid and really up the ante on .mac.

    Apple if you’re listening, now is the time to strike MSFT where it hurts. (even though I have both AAPL and MSFT) Offer $37 and they have to accept!

    As for yahoo, don’t worry, ups and downs based on emotions are not unusual, but Google wins big Monday. Yahoo is valuable, plain and simple.

    Why short yahoo when you can probably buy it long at a huge discount Monday?

  92. gorillamoso

    hey “Shafqat” (that can’t be a real name, can it? :)

    acc to time stamps and what i read on techmeme, cnet’s ina fried broke the story. sorry

  93. Observer

    If google is smart, they’ll walk away from Yahoo now as well. Their mission is accomplished. There will be no search deal.

    Last think google wants is to get involved in a regulatory mess with the US govt. If they do the Yahoo search deal, they likely will be a monopoly by any reasonable measure. All execution will slow to a crawl, everything will have to be approved by lawyers. Don’t think goog wants to do this for a few incremental points of marketshare.

  94. Alan Wilensky

    I called the tune months ago - a buddy at an investment bank said they were already out (mentally) back in February.

    http://bizcast.typepad.com/cli.....yahoo.html

  95. Alan Wilensky

    Ha! Brad Horowitz tweets “Congrats Jerry and good luck Yahoos!” No shit.

  96. ajadoniz

    I’m kind of happy in that it would have been a nightmare to untangle the mess that is Yahoo!. Jerry is a douche, not for trying to “extort” money from MS, but because he’s been incompetent in steering Yahoo!.

  97. Akhmad fathonih

    How sick is yahoo,really?i mean financially.
    I already know that yahoo is sick (read: very cool) at creating product. While google is releasing ‘not many’ thing cool recently, yahoo is waking up.
    Yahoo will its niche, as what google has done. Yahoo, i believe in you as i believe in google.

  98. Brian

    As a Yahoo s/h I’m not real happy about this but I’m even unhappier that this letter was somehow obtained and published on the internet without any mention of how it was obtained. I have no problem with the release of the news but someone in 1 of those 2 companies needs to lose their job for leaking this letter and I really hope someone in either MS or Yahoo can figure out how this happened and take appropriate measures. If this happened in my company, I’d turn it upside down to nail the big mouth.

  99. Jerry Yang

    i swear it is not my fault. the board put me upto it. Shareholders please don’t hang me. i have a great vision it will take three years and we will be a giant again… really my magic ball told me. To our employees we can realize the REAL value of our company and watch all your dreams go down the drain.

  100. Son Nguyen

    The reasons Steve mentioned are definitely very strong arguments. Yahoo gave up its fight in paid search advertising. Panama, AMP! or whatever next are no longer serious commitments. Now everyone should be very afraid of Google!

  101. Sandra G

    This is terrible for Microsoft, they couldn’t catch Yahoo on their own before, they won’t now and are destined to be a distant 3rd in search and advertising.

    This is ok for Yahoo, they may still work on a search advertising deal with Google if it doesn’t get tripped up by regulators.

    This is awesome for Google, they are still the unchallenged leader in search and advertising (not that it would have changed if the deal had gone through). I bet they want the deal with Yahoo to go through just so they can put the stake through Microsoft’s heart and take them off the internet for good.

    Anyone want to start a pool as to how long Ballmer will be with Microsoft now? My guess is he will be gone by September. I mean really, what more can he do with Microsoft? Buying AOL for him won’t change anything. God knows they can’t buy their way to the top now without Yahoo. Mahalo? Powerset? That won’t change anything.

  102. BlogReader

    #64 shannon, cultures dont matter in this type of offer. This is an ACQUISITION, not a merger. Yahoo was just going to be a marketshare addition to Microsoft, thats it. Who gives a fuck about the cultures when you get 20% added to your search engine marketshare

    This wasn’t about marketshare in search at all, Microsoft is far behind in the mobilespace and needed a way to break into it. Also do you think that tech companies are just about their product? Yahoo’s nothing without their dedicated employees running the ship, if MSFT were to anger them they would leave and MSFT would be stuck with an anchor.

  103. Robert

    What people don’t understand is that this is a master blow by Ballmer and Microsoft. Yahoo will be busy with lawsuits, low morale , angry shareholders and analysts not willing to buy anything they do or say…

    Meanwhile Microsoft will keep buying other niche companies, ante up the game against yahoo search and might even come back and buy yahoo at $28…It is a win win for Microsoft!

    Jerry - Who the f..k gave you all that advice? When we bought a shitload of shares for our investment firm, we came up with a value of 32$ ,this was in 2006 when the market was even better..Expect lawsuits from us come monday!

  104. chance

    I do predict MS will wait 3-6 months with the bid at 33 and finish the deal. I suppose Google does need competition in search from advertisers to keep their rates in line, but with the development of ad networks on niche sites, I think that will help advertiser prices. I did not want to see MS-Yahoo for the fact that while they may be losing in search, they are still the top 2 of portal and e-mail usage and in essence own the online lives of many consumers. While google isn’t a portal with content, its goals are to collect as much info on the individual consumer as possible through search or web-optimization which makes it somewhat scary to privacy advocates.

  105. Gustavo Cardoso

    Does anybody here cat the discrepancy between what Yahoo IS and what Jerry THINK it is? The thing of partining with Google for advertising is Yahoo declaring its incompetence to squeeze money from this market (dominated by Google). And they are telling Microsoft that they worth more than what was offered? FOR WHAT?? For christ sake… What a huge discrepancy… They are prostituting their selves to Google and telling Microsoft they worth $37.00?? Dream-on… For the first time in my life I admint that Ballmer did very clever! =D

  106. ryan

    @86 good job, buddy. you “called the tune” based on the word of a “3rd-tier gopher” at an investment bank NOT retained by yahoo or msft. you must be so proud, notwithstanding the fact that you had a 50/50 shot of being right, an unreliable source, and you got the reason for msft walking away wrong. still, well done.

  107. Jorge

    @90 As the letter is posted in a press release on the home page of Microsoft.com it hardly seems necessary to turn either company “upside down” to figure out where it came from.

  108. John

    @ Brian - do you really think that Ballmer didn’t know that the letter would be leaked? Sending a letter to all of Microsoft employees is just an indirect way of sending a letter to the press.

  109. Marty One

    YHOO’s board, especially Jerry, are probably wishing they could sell their shares before Monday! Or course, that would be illegal. MSFT, I hate to say it, is being very smart. They will be able to buy YHOO at fire sale prices before long. Not smart Jerry!

  110. Steve Ballmer of MS

    Little prick tried to bluff me.

  111. Sheeni Meeni

    Yahoo Board better hire some good lawyers to handle the flood of shareholder lawsuits that are bound to be filed.

    Eeks.

  112. lil Billy

    Thank god MS doesn’t get to screw this up too.

  113. Icarus

    Msft - > next target -> Facebook ?

  114. Icarus

    Will this slow down fresh hiring at Msft?

  115. MMT

    Yup. Saw this one coming a mile away. Good for Microsoft. They’ll be able to buy Yahoo for low twenties in six months.

    http://www.bestcashcow.com/tec.....oft-google

  116. Dumb & Dumber

    Re: Facebook comment

    Facebook is not a good acquisition target by any means. At $0.92 CPM they are overvalued already.

  117. Hyloka

    Microsoft’s next move should be to take that $1.5B that it was going to use to retain Yahoo!’s best employees, lease a big building down the street from Yahoo! and offer some really fat sign-on and retention bonuses for the best Yahoo!’s to leave. I’m guessing with their stock in the crapper and just being told by their management that all of their efforts on Panama sucked in comparison with Google search, they might prefer to feel the love over at Microsoft.

  118. Patrick Grote

    Marty One … I believe you are correct.

    Microsoft will end up with Yahoo at 50% off the price they offered. Yahoo stock will end up around $10 a share.

  119. vasudev