April 30, 2008

AOL’s Ad Strategy Still Waiting to Kick In

Erick Schonfeld

15 comments »

aol-logo.pngAOL may have the widest-reaching advertising network in Platform A, but it is not seeing the financial rewards of that reach. In fact, Time Warner today announced that during the first quarter, AOL’s overall advertising revenues grew just 1 percent. Total revenues at AOL slid 23 percent because the access business continues to go away, but everybody knows that and the focus now is on whether AOL can reinvent itself as a pure Internet advertising company.

AOL spent about $1 billion over the past year on companies like Tacoda and Quigo to buy its ad network market share. Those businesses aren’t quite kicking in yet partly because of delays in integrating their sales forces But the bigger problem was that gains in third-party ads sold on other sites were almost completely offset last quarter by an 18 percent drop in display ads on AOL-owned properties. AOL makes a lot more margin on ads it sells on its own sites than on ads it sells on other sites. That is why it is trying to boost its own pageviews by upgrading its sites and is the reason why it bought Bebo for $850 million earlier this year. The more ad inventory AOL can sell on its own sites, the better its margins will be.

AOL’s deal with Google on paid search advertising, like IAC’s. is also helping to shore up its overall advertising sales. Although, it is not clear what the exact impact was because the company did not break out the numbers.

  • Sphere It

Trackbacks/Pings (Trackback URL)

  1. TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ » AOLの広告戦略、未だ機能せず
  2. ethomaz » Ads By Themselves Won't Cut It
  3. Could AOL Be Next on Microsoft’s List?
  4. www.ubraniaroxy.pl » Blog Archive » Could AOL Be Next on Microsoft’s List?
  5. World car insure » yahoo’dan sonra listede aol mu var ?
  6. yahoo’dan sonra listede aol mu var ? | Siyaset Bilimi

Comments

RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. 113.com

    Better than negative… :-o

  2. Siddharth

    Not everyone can be hit in very medium. Google is the best in online advertising and search and the other web companies should understand that. Yahoo! is partnering with Google for search and ads and now AOL, may be MSN is not away. :-D

  3. ValleyGuy

    How come Ask’s RPS is going up when Google’s wasn’t?

    A decline in ISP business has direct impact on pageviews on AOL network so while its a known fact that the access revenues are declining, the impact on pageviews is perhaps a mystery

  4. Yakov

    I have got a simple solution - they have to replace their current site search with Quintura to increase page-views and clicks-through.

  5. Peter Urban

    Comment on TechCrunch: AOL’s Ad Strategy Still Waiting to Kick In {seesmic_video:{”url_thumbnail”:{”value”:”http://t.seesmic.com/thumbnail/rqfdfJhDWX_th1.jpg”}”title”:{”value”:”Comment on TechCrunch: AOL’s Ad Strategy Still Waiting to Kick In ”}”videoUri”:{”value”:”http://www.seesmic.com/video/ar8nrawL7j”}}}

  6. Darren Lee

    I am still trying to figure out if a company that acquires too many will become too big and slow moving… Perhaps I will know the answer one day … :)

  7. Jay

    yes indeed aol has powerful advert background.. but isn’t aol a daughter company of that Yahoo! giant?

  8. MathandCheeseWiz

    The big PR push on page view growth and the pre-announcement of the complete separation of Cable last week was a classic leading indicator of prepping for a weak quarter. Looking at the reported numbers, 18% year over year pageview growth paired with a steep decline in display revenue is not a great story, and makes it hard to trend going forward - certainly portends mediocre performance/growth at best. What does all this mean? Are they bulking up on low cal pages (like Bebo) to game the Comscore metrics? That seems pretty tactical. Certainly, nuking their high end sales force and replacing it with machine-managed inventory comes at a revenue per pageview cost, but maybe the math works in a way I am unaware.

  9. Press Release Point

    Darren Lee, There are plenty of examples to say that companies can run fast and at the same time acquire and integrate many other companies. IBM, Cisco, Google etc are some good examples. But there are more companies that mismanage acquisitions and end up in mess.

Leave a Reply

Continue the conversation in TechCrunch Forums