April 29, 2008

Ready To Rumble: Here’s Who Microsoft Will Bring To a Hostile Fight Over Yahoo

Erick Schonfeld

29 comments »

reservoir-dogs.pngMicrosoft does not like to be rushed. Everyone is waiting for its next move, now that the deadline it set for Yahoo to accept its takeover bid expired last Saturday. And everyone can keep waiting. Nevertheless, preparations are being made for an announcement this week from Microsoft on what it will do next.

Out of its various options, the two most likely are either to go hostile with the bid or to walk away. Chief financial officer Chris Liddell signaled as much during last weeks’ earnings conference call, where he also discounted the possibility of a higher bid:

The strongest argument that we should increase our bid because we can afford to is not one I favor. We have yet to see tangible evidence that our bid substantially undervalues the company. In fact we see the opposite.

That might have been posturing, but I don’t think so. Last week, Citi analyst Mark Mahaney put the odds of Microsoft going hostile at 40 percent, and of walking away at 10 percent. In the event of a hostile offer, Microsoft could either try to go directly to shareholders and ask them to tender their shares or engage in a proxy battle to replace Yahoo’s board of directors. A tender offer would trigger Yahoo’s poison pill and get really messy and expensive. (For an excellent discussion on how all of this would work, read Marc Andreessen’s post on the subject).

All signs point to a coming proxy battle. Microsoft has picked its alternate slate to replace Yahoo’s board of directors. And it has gathered around itself a group of advisers known for their bare-knuckle M&A tactics. Who is this group of reservoir dogs that Microsoft would bring to a fight to take over Yahoo’s board? They include:

Morgan Stanley. Investment bankers Paul Taubman, Drew Guevara, Thomas Whayne, Chuck Cory, and Rob Kindler are on the crew assigned to Microsoft. Taubman heads up Morgan Stanley’s entire global mergers and acquisitions group (but he also had the dubious distinction of advising Time Warner on the AOL deal).
The Blackstone Group. Jill Greenthal is advising from this high-powered investment bank that specializes in M&A, among other things.
Joele Frank. She is the person you call when you are doing a hostile takeover and you need special public relations for the occasion. That is what she does: hostile PR. She is good and she is fierce.
Innisfree M&A. A proxy solicitation firm that handles the logistics of a proxy battle.

These are all veteran fighters who don’t mind getting a little blood on their hands.

They’ll be up against Yahoo’s investment bankers, led by Goldman Sachs (Lehman and Moelis are also advisers). We’ve also heard a rumor that low-key M&A consulting firm MacKenzie Partners is helping Yahoo. (But judging from all the dead links on their Website, maybe it is Yahoo who should be helping them)

Watching from the sidelines will be Google, with their back-up man Frank Quattrone at Qatalyst and his old partner George Boutros at Credit Suisse.

Should Microsoft walk away or unleash its reservoir dogs?

  • Sphere It

Comments

I don’t understand what the “great value” is to begin with with acquiring Yahoo… that is a crap load of money that could easily be spent hiring a whole city of programmers to not only duplicate but vastly improve on what Yahoo is bringing to the table for a fraction of the costs.

Jon
http://dreamclue.com …get the message!

 

Its show time !!!!

 

Quite an impressive team.

 
 

“Release the hounds!”

 

The MacKenzie rumor made me LOL.

 

That’s some serious firepower to assemble if you’re getting ready to “walk away”.

 
 

Love the photo & comparison w/the movie.

 

roflmao @ MacKenzie Partners’ website ..

 

When will Microsoft just go away?

 
 
 

Maybe Microsoft is just being dumb by releasing it’s reservoir dogs. It will make serious wounds on the Yahoo! as a company, my guess.

Just offer more for “god’s sake” or walk away.

(”I’m gonna destroy, destroy you!”, Microsoftzilla to Yahoo! Kong)

 

It seems so silly to me to go through a nasty battle with a company that they desperately need. It’s like cutting off the arm of your enemy then giving them a high five. How happy do you think Yahoo employees will be to go work with Microsoft after MS takes them to task? I’m guessing, not very.

Google is just loving this, more and more market share goes to them and the nastier this gets, the better for them and the more it will hurt MS and Yahoo.

 

@ Jon, #1: MS is probably after Yahoo! for their marketing business. If MS is going to be able to put up a fight against Googles Adsense program, they need volume. Yahoo can bring some volume to Microsofts ad-program. Oh, and they would also get a couple of cool programmers and other stuff… :)

@ Sandra G, #15: My guess is that MS primarily wants the Yahoo ad-network. If they can get a couple of programmers and cool technology as well, thats an added bonus, but not likely what made MS start the bidding in the first place. A merged MicroHoo would most certainly need to get rid of some staff due to overlapping services and cost-cuttings. If some Yahoo staff decide that MicroHoo is not for them, they would probably be playing right in to Microsoft’s hands by quitting before the merger is a fact. Yahoo’s key, strategic personnel would most likely be looking forward to some juicy benefits program, and the rest can be replaced by Microsoft staff or new contracters…

 

Can someone please do a ‘chris crocker’ and make a “please leave yahoo alone” video. That seems to be the common sentiment across the board. Or better yet, someone find that crocker kid and pay him to make a ‘Yahoo’ sequel of his video.

 
 

@chughes
agreed, love the comparison as well.
Some Yahoo employees are calling around looking for new jobs as well.

 

FU MS Biaches. Leave Yahoo Alone.

 

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.