<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GroupTweet Back Online, Promises No More Privacy Slip Ups</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/29/grouptweet-back-online-promises-no-more-privacy-slipups/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/29/grouptweet-back-online-promises-no-more-privacy-slipups/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 05:45:16 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Online Sudokuer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/29/grouptweet-back-online-promises-no-more-privacy-slipups/comment-page-1/#comment-2251924</link>
		<dc:creator>Online Sudokuer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 20:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/29/grouptweet-back-online-promises-no-more-privacy-slipups/#comment-2251924</guid>
		<description>shouldn&#039;t twitter include this in their feature list ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>shouldn&#8217;t twitter include this in their feature list ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deys.ca &#187; GroupTweet Privacy Slip Up?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/29/grouptweet-back-online-promises-no-more-privacy-slipups/comment-page-1/#comment-2241153</link>
		<dc:creator>Deys.ca &#187; GroupTweet Privacy Slip Up?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 03:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/29/grouptweet-back-online-promises-no-more-privacy-slipups/#comment-2241153</guid>
		<description>[...] clipped from www.techcrunch.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] clipped from <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.techcrunch.com'>http://www.techcrunch.com</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ontario Emperor</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/29/grouptweet-back-online-promises-no-more-privacy-slipups/comment-page-1/#comment-2240530</link>
		<dc:creator>Ontario Emperor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 00:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/29/grouptweet-back-online-promises-no-more-privacy-slipups/#comment-2240530</guid>
		<description>Whether Aaron was careless or not in his original design (and I can&#039;t really judge that), I have admired his rapid response to this whole mess. I wish him the best of luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether Aaron was careless or not in his original design (and I can&#8217;t really judge that), I have admired his rapid response to this whole mess. I wish him the best of luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny P</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/29/grouptweet-back-online-promises-no-more-privacy-slipups/comment-page-1/#comment-2234360</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 21:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/29/grouptweet-back-online-promises-no-more-privacy-slipups/#comment-2234360</guid>
		<description>Metacafe is the only decent alternative to the GooTube monopoly. I hope that they will keep growing. I think that they will!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Metacafe is the only decent alternative to the GooTube monopoly. I hope that they will keep growing. I think that they will!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach Weisman</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/29/grouptweet-back-online-promises-no-more-privacy-slipups/comment-page-1/#comment-2234349</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach Weisman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 21:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/29/grouptweet-back-online-promises-no-more-privacy-slipups/#comment-2234349</guid>
		<description>I am a strong proponent for openness BUT that does not mean at the expense of data that the user INTENDS TO BE PRIVATE.  Data portability in every sense should be available as should security precautions that the USER should fully control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a strong proponent for openness BUT that does not mean at the expense of data that the user INTENDS TO BE PRIVATE.  Data portability in every sense should be available as should security precautions that the USER should fully control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/29/grouptweet-back-online-promises-no-more-privacy-slipups/comment-page-1/#comment-2234193</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/29/grouptweet-back-online-promises-no-more-privacy-slipups/#comment-2234193</guid>
		<description>GroupTweet didn&#039;t think through their service.  This should have been an obvious problem to someone designing a piece of software.  There is no reason to have any faith in them.  They are sure to &quot;overlook&quot; major problems with their software again.

My recommendation is to keep away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GroupTweet didn&#8217;t think through their service.  This should have been an obvious problem to someone designing a piece of software.  There is no reason to have any faith in them.  They are sure to &#8220;overlook&#8221; major problems with their software again.</p>
<p>My recommendation is to keep away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; プライバシー問題を解決して、GroupTweetサービス再開</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/29/grouptweet-back-online-promises-no-more-privacy-slipups/comment-page-1/#comment-2234154</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; プライバシー問題を解決して、GroupTweetサービス再開</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/29/grouptweet-back-online-promises-no-more-privacy-slipups/#comment-2234154</guid>
		<description>[...] ［本文へ］ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ［本文へ］ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acedanger</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/29/grouptweet-back-online-promises-no-more-privacy-slipups/comment-page-1/#comment-2233947</link>
		<dc:creator>acedanger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 19:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/29/grouptweet-back-online-promises-no-more-privacy-slipups/#comment-2233947</guid>
		<description>Zach, @1 - no, don&#039;t blame twitter for being too open, @2 - no, twitter shouldn&#039;t do anything special for third party apps</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zach, @1 &#8211; no, don&#8217;t blame twitter for being too open, @2 &#8211; no, twitter shouldn&#8217;t do anything special for third party apps</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach Weisman</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/29/grouptweet-back-online-promises-no-more-privacy-slipups/comment-page-1/#comment-2233940</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach Weisman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 19:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/29/grouptweet-back-online-promises-no-more-privacy-slipups/#comment-2233940</guid>
		<description>Even if it is user error, Twitter should at least have a SPECIAL warning for GroupTweet users....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if it is user error, Twitter should at least have a SPECIAL warning for GroupTweet users&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach Weisman</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/29/grouptweet-back-online-promises-no-more-privacy-slipups/comment-page-1/#comment-2233937</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach Weisman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 19:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/29/grouptweet-back-online-promises-no-more-privacy-slipups/#comment-2233937</guid>
		<description>Cheers to GroupTweet for being so responsible.  

I blame Twitter for the problem as they allowed third parties too much access.  They should have their shit on lock down by now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheers to GroupTweet for being so responsible.  </p>
<p>I blame Twitter for the problem as they allowed third parties too much access.  They should have their shit on lock down by now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
