<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Says Yes With Mesh</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/27/just-say-yes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/27/just-say-yes/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 10:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: //steve clayton: geek in disguise : Live Mesh and MobileMe</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/27/just-say-yes/#comment-2378684</link>
		<dc:creator>//steve clayton: geek in disguise : Live Mesh and MobileMe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/27/just-say-yes/#comment-2378684</guid>
		<description>[...] that helps! I ought to track down what Steve Gillmor thinks as he seems to “get” Mesh.   Filed under: Apple, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that helps! I ought to track down what Steve Gillmor thinks as he seems to “get” Mesh.   Filed under: Apple, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ESPN Dev Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Web 2.0 Conf, Day 2: The Clone Wars</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/27/just-say-yes/#comment-2305484</link>
		<dc:creator>ESPN Dev Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Web 2.0 Conf, Day 2: The Clone Wars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 07:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/27/just-say-yes/#comment-2305484</guid>
		<description>[...] Then there were the keynotes. O'Reilly got people all O'riled up and read a 50-line Rilke poem (which was not part of the O'riling). Max Levchin (dude who created PayPal and Slide) basically told us to, in the words of Winston Churchill, "never surrender." I think Churchill was actually talking about Internet startups too when he said that. Can't remember. Amit Mital from Microsoft showcased their newest product "Microsoft Mesh". This new product basically syncs files across any number of devices and greatly eases the ability to share files with others. I feel like there's going to be a fair amount of overhead to learn how to actually use the system for the average user - Microsoft has a pretty spotty history in terms of designing for the computer-savvy. I know, for example, that no member of my family would be able to figure out what he was showing in his video. (Paraphrasing) "You open up the mesh, attach your devices or link to them via your network, open up your target folder, and drag and drop files you want to add to your mesh. Files you want to share can be dragged to your shared mesh, etc etc." My Mom and Dad would be mouth agape after "You open up the mesh"... It's just too complicated. Not to mention it only works with Microsoft products, though they claim Mac support is coming. So we'll see how useful it actually turns out to be. It's an okay idea though. Steve Gillmor likes it: Microsoft Says Yes With Mesh [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Then there were the keynotes. O&#8217;Reilly got people all O&#8217;riled up and read a 50-line Rilke poem (which was not part of the O&#8217;riling). Max Levchin (dude who created PayPal and Slide) basically told us to, in the words of Winston Churchill, &#8220;never surrender.&#8221; I think Churchill was actually talking about Internet startups too when he said that. Can&#8217;t remember. Amit Mital from Microsoft showcased their newest product &#8220;Microsoft Mesh&#8221;. This new product basically syncs files across any number of devices and greatly eases the ability to share files with others. I feel like there&#8217;s going to be a fair amount of overhead to learn how to actually use the system for the average user - Microsoft has a pretty spotty history in terms of designing for the computer-savvy. I know, for example, that no member of my family would be able to figure out what he was showing in his video. (Paraphrasing) &#8220;You open up the mesh, attach your devices or link to them via your network, open up your target folder, and drag and drop files you want to add to your mesh. Files you want to share can be dragged to your shared mesh, etc etc.&#8221; My Mom and Dad would be mouth agape after &#8220;You open up the mesh&#8221;&#8230; It&#8217;s just too complicated. Not to mention it only works with Microsoft products, though they claim Mac support is coming. So we&#8217;ll see how useful it actually turns out to be. It&#8217;s an okay idea though. Steve Gillmor likes it: Microsoft Says Yes With Mesh [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rare United States Coins</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/27/just-say-yes/#comment-2296659</link>
		<dc:creator>Rare United States Coins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 17:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/27/just-say-yes/#comment-2296659</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Rare United States Coins...&lt;/strong&gt;

I found your site on technorati and read a few of your other posts. Keep up the good work. I just added your RSS feed to my Google News Reader. Looking forward to reading more from you....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Rare United States Coins&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I found your site on technorati and read a few of your other posts. Keep up the good work. I just added your RSS feed to my Google News Reader. Looking forward to reading more from you&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trackonomics</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/27/just-say-yes/#comment-2257928</link>
		<dc:creator>Trackonomics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 21:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/27/just-say-yes/#comment-2257928</guid>
		<description>[...] The Gillmor Gang on TechCrunch went as well as could be expected. After the reunion cattle call and last week&#8217;s Mesh interrogation of David Treadwell, the apparent news shifted back to the denouement of the Microsoft Yahoo [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Gillmor Gang on TechCrunch went as well as could be expected. After the reunion cattle call and last week&#8217;s Mesh interrogation of David Treadwell, the apparent news shifted back to the denouement of the Microsoft Yahoo [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trackonomics</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/27/just-say-yes/#comment-2257929</link>
		<dc:creator>Trackonomics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 21:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/27/just-say-yes/#comment-2257929</guid>
		<description>[...] The Gillmor Gang on TechCrunch went as well as could be expected. After the reunion cattle call and last week&#8217;s Mesh interrogation of David Treadwell, the apparent news shifted back to the denouement of the Microsoft Yahoo [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Gillmor Gang on TechCrunch went as well as could be expected. After the reunion cattle call and last week&#8217;s Mesh interrogation of David Treadwell, the apparent news shifted back to the denouement of the Microsoft Yahoo [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vaspers</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/27/just-say-yes/#comment-2251238</link>
		<dc:creator>vaspers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 18:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/27/just-say-yes/#comment-2251238</guid>
		<description>In his long-winded podcast where he shouted down Prokofy, Steve Gillmor reminded me of Rush Limbaugh. He doesn't understand Twitter at all, refuses to use @username to reply, and yaks on and on about his dopey "track methodolgy" to monitor mentions of his name.

Arrogant. Pompous. Long-winded. Prolix.

i.e., old fashioned "command and control" mentality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In his long-winded podcast where he shouted down Prokofy, Steve Gillmor reminded me of Rush Limbaugh. He doesn&#8217;t understand Twitter at all, refuses to use @username to reply, and yaks on and on about his dopey &#8220;track methodolgy&#8221; to monitor mentions of his name.</p>
<p>Arrogant. Pompous. Long-winded. Prolix.</p>
<p>i.e., old fashioned &#8220;command and control&#8221; mentality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekly microsoft oriented crumbs #2 - Service Endpoint</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/27/just-say-yes/#comment-2234960</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekly microsoft oriented crumbs #2 - Service Endpoint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 02:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/27/just-say-yes/#comment-2234960</guid>
		<description>[...] Microsoft Says Yes With Mesh - Steve Gilmores take on Live Mesh and a with talks to  David Treadwell, VP of the Live Platform Services in his podcast [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Microsoft Says Yes With Mesh - Steve Gilmores take on Live Mesh and a with talks to  David Treadwell, VP of the Live Platform Services in his podcast [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Gillmor says &#8230; huh?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/27/just-say-yes/#comment-2234914</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Gillmor says &#8230; huh?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 01:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/27/just-say-yes/#comment-2234914</guid>
		<description>[...] sent this link as a &#8220;great article about Live Mesh&#8221; ... and it was so bad, that I just have to rant [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] sent this link as a &#8220;great article about Live Mesh&#8221; &#8230; and it was so bad, that I just have to rant [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekly SOA crumbs #15: Have you seen the latest &#8220;mesh&#8221;up from Microsoft? - Service Endpoint</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/27/just-say-yes/#comment-2234908</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekly SOA crumbs #15: Have you seen the latest &#8220;mesh&#8221;up from Microsoft? - Service Endpoint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 01:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/27/just-say-yes/#comment-2234908</guid>
		<description>[...] Microsoft Says Yes With Mesh - Steve Gilmores take on Live Mesh and also talks to  David Treadwell, VP of the Live Platform Services in his podcast [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Microsoft Says Yes With Mesh - Steve Gilmores take on Live Mesh and also talks to  David Treadwell, VP of the Live Platform Services in his podcast [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/27/just-say-yes/#comment-2234222</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/27/just-say-yes/#comment-2234222</guid>
		<description>Hate to be crass, but MS is really good at building a thousand free things, but it only makes money on about four: Windows, Office, SQL and Exchange. Where's the money? At the end of the day, that's what it's all about, especially for MS. Will commercial t?rds drop through the mesh onto every personal interaction?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hate to be crass, but MS is really good at building a thousand free things, but it only makes money on about four: Windows, Office, SQL and Exchange. Where&#8217;s the money? At the end of the day, that&#8217;s what it&#8217;s all about, especially for MS. Will commercial t?rds drop through the mesh onto every personal interaction?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miles (SEM iCluck)</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/27/just-say-yes/#comment-2234088</link>
		<dc:creator>Miles (SEM iCluck)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/27/just-say-yes/#comment-2234088</guid>
		<description>Mesh = good, Thank god. Microsoft may still eventually die into the shadows but I have a feeling this Yahoo! deal will become more and more interesting - especially if the deal is a hostile takeover, that will ruin employee retention and Yahoo! will basically be a Yahoo!less company...........Poor Microsoft</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mesh = good, Thank god. Microsoft may still eventually die into the shadows but I have a feeling this Yahoo! deal will become more and more interesting - especially if the deal is a hostile takeover, that will ruin employee retention and Yahoo! will basically be a Yahoo!less company&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..Poor Microsoft</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amyloo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/27/just-say-yes/#comment-2233079</link>
		<dc:creator>Amyloo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/27/just-say-yes/#comment-2233079</guid>
		<description>"Anyway, I’m guessing his posts will come in moderation given the visceral reaction fm a large number of the posts."

Oh, I get it now. You guys think you have some _power_. That's pretty interesting. This reaction is all pretty interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Anyway, I’m guessing his posts will come in moderation given the visceral reaction fm a large number of the posts.&#8221;</p>
<p>Oh, I get it now. You guys think you have some _power_. That&#8217;s pretty interesting. This reaction is all pretty interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P-Air</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/27/just-say-yes/#comment-2232418</link>
		<dc:creator>P-Air</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 07:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/27/just-say-yes/#comment-2232418</guid>
		<description>It's all about context.  Steve's writing in a more proper Gillmor context (like on the Gillmore Gang) is more enjoyable than in a TechCrunch context.  While he wrote a thought provoking piece, I didn't come to TechCrunch for "thought provoking", I came for some down time catch up on my news bytes.  I don't always agree w/Steve's perspectives, but do appreciate the thoughtfulness behind his posts (though I do occasionally get annoyed by the self aggrandizing tone and style, almost patronizing or belittling the reader...kinda reminds of Diane Chambers fm Cheers!).  Anyway, I'm guessing his posts will come in moderation given the visceral reaction fm a large number of the posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s all about context.  Steve&#8217;s writing in a more proper Gillmor context (like on the Gillmore Gang) is more enjoyable than in a TechCrunch context.  While he wrote a thought provoking piece, I didn&#8217;t come to TechCrunch for &#8220;thought provoking&#8221;, I came for some down time catch up on my news bytes.  I don&#8217;t always agree w/Steve&#8217;s perspectives, but do appreciate the thoughtfulness behind his posts (though I do occasionally get annoyed by the self aggrandizing tone and style, almost patronizing or belittling the reader&#8230;kinda reminds of Diane Chambers fm Cheers!).  Anyway, I&#8217;m guessing his posts will come in moderation given the visceral reaction fm a large number of the posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mesh-ified! &#171; thirdrow</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/27/just-say-yes/#comment-2232317</link>
		<dc:creator>mesh-ified! &#171; thirdrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 06:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/27/just-say-yes/#comment-2232317</guid>
		<description>[...] will be another great product from MS. And it&#8217;s been getting a good review. Here&#8217;s a great article from TechCrunch stating why Google should be worry about Live Mesh. And here&#8217;s another from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] will be another great product from MS. And it&#8217;s been getting a good review. Here&#8217;s a great article from TechCrunch stating why Google should be worry about Live Mesh. And here&#8217;s another from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Brogan...</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/27/just-say-yes/#comment-2232178</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Brogan...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 05:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/27/just-say-yes/#comment-2232178</guid>
		<description>I'm still over here thinking, "Steve's writing at TechCrunch?" ... Guess a week away from tech blogs really leaves one in the dark. 

Write the way you like, Steve. I'd read you anywhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still over here thinking, &#8220;Steve&#8217;s writing at TechCrunch?&#8221; &#8230; Guess a week away from tech blogs really leaves one in the dark. </p>
<p>Write the way you like, Steve. I&#8217;d read you anywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gillmor Gang rebounds &#171; Filtered Media</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/27/just-say-yes/#comment-2231813</link>
		<dc:creator>Gillmor Gang rebounds &#171; Filtered Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 02:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/27/just-say-yes/#comment-2231813</guid>
		<description>[...] wrap your noggin around this post and comments at TechCrunch. The fun has started. Possibly related posts: (automatically [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wrap your noggin around this post and comments at TechCrunch. The fun has started. Possibly related posts: (automatically [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/27/just-say-yes/#comment-2231798</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 02:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/27/just-say-yes/#comment-2231798</guid>
		<description>I haven't chuckled my way through a comment stream like this for ages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t chuckled my way through a comment stream like this for ages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blue Sky</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/27/just-say-yes/#comment-2231524</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue Sky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/27/just-say-yes/#comment-2231524</guid>
		<description>I think I understood to article. Reading it was an excellent mental exercise when compared to the what I frequently read in similar posts.  I do however get the feeling that there's an elitist group here looking down their collective noses at those who find this type of writing daunting to make sense of.  I think the suggestion of providing a clear summary of the post is valid.  Someone with better writing skills and more familiar with the subject matter than myself should take this on.  This is based on the assumption you want a wider audience to understand the information being discussed which I hope is the case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I understood to article. Reading it was an excellent mental exercise when compared to the what I frequently read in similar posts.  I do however get the feeling that there&#8217;s an elitist group here looking down their collective noses at those who find this type of writing daunting to make sense of.  I think the suggestion of providing a clear summary of the post is valid.  Someone with better writing skills and more familiar with the subject matter than myself should take this on.  This is based on the assumption you want a wider audience to understand the information being discussed which I hope is the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Howlett</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/27/just-say-yes/#comment-2231460</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Howlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 23:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/27/just-say-yes/#comment-2231460</guid>
		<description>I don't care what the other 90% think - Steve's insights are well worth the reading. Pity so many people can't appreciate good literature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t care what the other 90% think - Steve&#8217;s insights are well worth the reading. Pity so many people can&#8217;t appreciate good literature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Camp</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/27/just-say-yes/#comment-2230953</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Camp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/27/just-say-yes/#comment-2230953</guid>
		<description>It was the longest nonsensical haiku in the history of the form.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was the longest nonsensical haiku in the history of the form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Hawks</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/27/just-say-yes/#comment-2230954</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Hawks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/27/just-say-yes/#comment-2230954</guid>
		<description>Was this article a waste of my time? Yes.
Was this story filled with made up terms that only exist to a microbig riding the SocMedBS bus to Officenomics? Yes.
Will I quit reading TechCrunch if they start trying to publish more junk like this?
The answer is a resounding yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was this article a waste of my time? Yes.<br />
Was this story filled with made up terms that only exist to a microbig riding the SocMedBS bus to Officenomics? Yes.<br />
Will I quit reading TechCrunch if they start trying to publish more junk like this?<br />
The answer is a resounding yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Learning Aesthetics - Mesh</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/27/just-say-yes/#comment-2230917</link>
		<dc:creator>Learning Aesthetics - Mesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/27/just-say-yes/#comment-2230917</guid>
		<description>[...] Gillmor has a TechCrunch post which demo&#8217;s that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gillmor has a TechCrunch post which demo&#8217;s that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mahadev</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/27/just-say-yes/#comment-2230813</link>
		<dc:creator>Mahadev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/27/just-say-yes/#comment-2230813</guid>
		<description>It truly scares me to think there are people out there that think that Gillmor makes any form of sense whatsoever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It truly scares me to think there are people out there that think that Gillmor makes any form of sense whatsoever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eikonos</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/27/just-say-yes/#comment-2230555</link>
		<dc:creator>eikonos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 17:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/27/just-say-yes/#comment-2230555</guid>
		<description>I agree with (what seems to be) the basic point: Mesh is good, however the writing is spectacularly, astonishingly bad.  Really, really awful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with (what seems to be) the basic point: Mesh is good, however the writing is spectacularly, astonishingly bad.  Really, really awful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence Salberg</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/27/just-say-yes/#comment-2230554</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence Salberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 17:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/27/just-say-yes/#comment-2230554</guid>
		<description>Soooo.... I thought I'd leave a brief comment saying that this "new guy" seems to be an excellent writer and that I enjoyed creative phrases like "standards baked in the dark having the same dubious odor" and "the seeming invulnerability of Gates’ machine accelerated to the boundaries of global saturation".

Then I see the 70+ comments decrying the use of big words and flowery language. And the references to Jane Austin (as if that commenter has ever read Austin or any classic literature to know of what he speaks). And the general malaise that fell upon said commenters as they struggled to engage their brain beyond their typical myopic 30-second samples of CollegeHumor.

And I'm at once both irritated and pleased. I see how an intelligent man like this Gillmor guy cuts through so much with this article, and yet, how so few are capable of understanding it. We have so much farther to go as a society.

But, then, as I write this, I'm reminded of one of my biggest pet peeves in the blogosphere and how Gillmor-esque writing may be the silent solution to one day ending tardo anonymous comments. TechCrunch has the oddest assembly of comments anywhere - gurus like Scoble mixed in with fools like JoeUser.

But maybe a blog that has a higher level of quality writing, not just highly sought after content, but content that is well-written (and humorous) can slowly make those JoeUser fiends disappear. They simply can't engage what they don't understand. Sort of a Jane Austin captcha.

Of course, if I had my two cents worth, it would be to mix both. I don't even know who this guy is - or his thrice-linked-to Gillmor Gang, but we could use a little more of it from time to time, me thinks.

BTW, when I clicked the "About TechCrunch" link (before I saw Gillmor's bio at the bottom) I didn't see him. But I did notice some female CEO named Heather who was listed first? Huh? Who the heck is she and why is she at the top of the page above Arrington and Schoenfield, et. al.? Just because she's the token CEO? If Mike got his girlfriend to sign her name on some state document, all well and good. But we don't give a flying leap about her - certainly not with the first billing she got on that page.

Anyway, for those commenters who got lost with this, here's your Twitter-esque summary: "Gillmor good, dumb commenters bad, Heather on bottom, Arrington on top". 

Yeah, I know. That sounded bad. Sorry. It couldn't be avoided in the 140 character limit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Soooo&#8230;. I thought I&#8217;d leave a brief comment saying that this &#8220;new guy&#8221; seems to be an excellent writer and that I enjoyed creative phrases like &#8220;standards baked in the dark having the same dubious odor&#8221; and &#8220;the seeming invulnerability of Gates’ machine accelerated to the boundaries of global saturation&#8221;.</p>
<p>Then I see the 70+ comments decrying the use of big words and flowery language. And the references to Jane Austin (as if that commenter has ever read Austin or any classic literature to know of what he speaks). And the general malaise that fell upon said commenters as they struggled to engage their brain beyond their typical myopic 30-second samples of CollegeHumor.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;m at once both irritated and pleased. I see how an intelligent man like this Gillmor guy cuts through so much with this article, and yet, how so few are capable of understanding it. We have so much farther to go as a society.</p>
<p>But, then, as I write this, I&#8217;m reminded of one of my biggest pet peeves in the blogosphere and how Gillmor-esque writing may be the silent solution to one day ending tardo anonymous comments. TechCrunch has the oddest assembly of comments anywhere - gurus like Scoble mixed in with fools like JoeUser.</p>
<p>But maybe a blog that has a higher level of quality writing, not just highly sought after content, but content that is well-written (and humorous) can slowly make those JoeUser fiends disappear. They simply can&#8217;t engage what they don&#8217;t understand. Sort of a Jane Austin captcha.</p>
<p>Of course, if I had my two cents worth, it would be to mix both. I don&#8217;t even know who this guy is - or his thrice-linked-to Gillmor Gang, but we could use a little more of it from time to time, me thinks.</p>
<p>BTW, when I clicked the &#8220;About TechCrunch&#8221; link (before I saw Gillmor&#8217;s bio at the bottom) I didn&#8217;t see him. But I did notice some female CEO named Heather who was listed first? Huh? Who the heck is she and why is she at the top of the page above Arrington and Schoenfield, et. al.? Just because she&#8217;s the token CEO? If Mike got his girlfriend to sign her name on some state document, all well and good. But we don&#8217;t give a flying leap about her - certainly not with the first billing she got on that page.</p>
<p>Anyway, for those commenters who got lost with this, here&#8217;s your Twitter-esque summary: &#8220;Gillmor good, dumb commenters bad, Heather on bottom, Arrington on top&#8221;. </p>
<p>Yeah, I know. That sounded bad. Sorry. It couldn&#8217;t be avoided in the 140 character limit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.115 seconds -->
