<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Update: Rackspace Files IPO, Will Set Price Via Auction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/26/update-rackspace-files-ipo-will-set-price-via-auction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/26/update-rackspace-files-ipo-will-set-price-via-auction/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:18:30 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Venk</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/26/update-rackspace-files-ipo-will-set-price-via-auction/comment-page-1/#comment-2764728</link>
		<dc:creator>Venk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 02:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/26/update-rackspace-files-ipo-will-set-price-via-auction/#comment-2764728</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d just like to agree with another comment that was made about companies like LiquidWeb taking away business from Rackspace.  I&#039;ve been with both Rackspace and LiquidWeb. I&#039;m currently with LiquidWeb and I&#039;d have to say their support and reliability are completely on level with Rackspace and their prices are much cheaper.  Soon I think Rackspace&#039;ll have to lower their rates or risk loosing their big corporate customers.  If anyone does want to signup for LiquidWeb, I have a referal URL I&#039;d appreciate if you used: http://www.liquidweb.com/?RID=vkoduru</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d just like to agree with another comment that was made about companies like LiquidWeb taking away business from Rackspace.  I&#8217;ve been with both Rackspace and LiquidWeb. I&#8217;m currently with LiquidWeb and I&#8217;d have to say their support and reliability are completely on level with Rackspace and their prices are much cheaper.  Soon I think Rackspace&#8217;ll have to lower their rates or risk loosing their big corporate customers.  If anyone does want to signup for LiquidWeb, I have a referal URL I&#8217;d appreciate if you used: <a href="http://www.liquidweb.com/?RID=vkoduru" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.liquidweb.com/?RID=vkoduru'>http://www.liqu...om/?RID=vkoduru</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rackspace Tests The IPO Waters Today; Settles For Half The Price It Was Hoping For &#124; WEB Tech 2.0</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/26/update-rackspace-files-ipo-will-set-price-via-auction/comment-page-1/#comment-2446337</link>
		<dc:creator>Rackspace Tests The IPO Waters Today; Settles For Half The Price It Was Hoping For &#124; WEB Tech 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 03:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/26/update-rackspace-files-ipo-will-set-price-via-auction/#comment-2446337</guid>
		<description>[...] filing for an IPO last April in which it hoped to raise $400 million, Web hosting provider (and cloud-computing aspirant) Rackspace finally priced its IPO last night at [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] filing for an IPO last April in which it hoped to raise $400 million, Web hosting provider (and cloud-computing aspirant) Rackspace finally priced its IPO last night at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rackspace Tests The IPO Waters Today; Settles For Half The Price It Was Hoping For</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/26/update-rackspace-files-ipo-will-set-price-via-auction/comment-page-1/#comment-2432926</link>
		<dc:creator>Rackspace Tests The IPO Waters Today; Settles For Half The Price It Was Hoping For</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 23:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/26/update-rackspace-files-ipo-will-set-price-via-auction/#comment-2432926</guid>
		<description>[...] filing for an IPO last April in which it hoped to raise $400 million, Web hosting provider (and cloud-computing aspirant) Rackspace finally priced its IPO last night at [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] filing for an IPO last April in which it hoped to raise $400 million, Web hosting provider (and cloud-computing aspirant) Rackspace finally priced its IPO last night at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rackspace Tests The IPO Waters Today; Settles For Half The Price It Was Hoping For &#124; Trinitude Network</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/26/update-rackspace-files-ipo-will-set-price-via-auction/comment-page-1/#comment-2432381</link>
		<dc:creator>Rackspace Tests The IPO Waters Today; Settles For Half The Price It Was Hoping For &#124; Trinitude Network</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 02:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/26/update-rackspace-files-ipo-will-set-price-via-auction/#comment-2432381</guid>
		<description>[...] filing for an IPO last April in which it hoped to raise 0 million, Web hosting provider (and cloud-computing aspirant) Rackspace finally priced its IPO last night at [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] filing for an IPO last April in which it hoped to raise 0 million, Web hosting provider (and cloud-computing aspirant) Rackspace finally priced its IPO last night at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/26/update-rackspace-files-ipo-will-set-price-via-auction/comment-page-1/#comment-2307879</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 04:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/26/update-rackspace-files-ipo-will-set-price-via-auction/#comment-2307879</guid>
		<description>&quot;All in all, it is a much more efficient way to price an IPO&quot;

What is your basis for this statement?  Theoretically, auctions don&#039;t work very well in environments similar to IPOs.  In practice, country after country has tried and had problems with this method.   This is the one IPO method that has consistently done poorly around the world.  What makes the US think that we&#039;re so different, without even looking at the hundreds of IPO auctions that have been done internationally?  Have you read the research on either the theory or the actual track record for this method?  

What incentive do people have to put a lot of time and effort into evaluating shares in this type of auction?  How many people understand the complicated theory behind bidding strategies?  How much should you shave your bid for the winner&#039;s curse, given that you can&#039;t pin down to the nearest hundred, or even to the nearest thousand, how many bidders there will be?  Perhaps you could walk me through when and why this method is a good idea, given that it takes work to come up with a reasonable estimate of the value of these shares, and given that the auction is open to potentially millions of free riders that have no clue what they&#039;re doing and don&#039;t want to do all that hard work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;All in all, it is a much more efficient way to price an IPO&#8221;</p>
<p>What is your basis for this statement?  Theoretically, auctions don&#8217;t work very well in environments similar to IPOs.  In practice, country after country has tried and had problems with this method.   This is the one IPO method that has consistently done poorly around the world.  What makes the US think that we&#8217;re so different, without even looking at the hundreds of IPO auctions that have been done internationally?  Have you read the research on either the theory or the actual track record for this method?  </p>
<p>What incentive do people have to put a lot of time and effort into evaluating shares in this type of auction?  How many people understand the complicated theory behind bidding strategies?  How much should you shave your bid for the winner&#8217;s curse, given that you can&#8217;t pin down to the nearest hundred, or even to the nearest thousand, how many bidders there will be?  Perhaps you could walk me through when and why this method is a good idea, given that it takes work to come up with a reasonable estimate of the value of these shares, and given that the auction is open to potentially millions of free riders that have no clue what they&#8217;re doing and don&#8217;t want to do all that hard work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hironde</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/26/update-rackspace-files-ipo-will-set-price-via-auction/comment-page-1/#comment-2304868</link>
		<dc:creator>hironde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 00:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/26/update-rackspace-files-ipo-will-set-price-via-auction/#comment-2304868</guid>
		<description>This site is recommended in case of the auction. http://auction.arekashite.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This site is recommended in case of the auction. <a href="http://auction.arekashite.com/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://auction.arekashite.com/'>http://auction.arekashite.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A happy RS customer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/26/update-rackspace-files-ipo-will-set-price-via-auction/comment-page-1/#comment-2251193</link>
		<dc:creator>A happy RS customer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 18:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/26/update-rackspace-files-ipo-will-set-price-via-auction/#comment-2251193</guid>
		<description>My company has been w/ RS for over 4 years and has worked with over 20 hosting companies over the last 10 years (we are technology company).  We spend over 2k per month for hosting (multiple boxes) which is well worth it for the level of service we demand.  NO other managed hosting provider has their culture or dedication to customers like RS - think the Nordstrom&#039;s customer service model brought to hosting.

I&#039;m buying the stock based on their strong committment to the customer, you really can&#039;t find another group with their dedication.  RS is going to be around for many years - the management team is top shelf, the employees are exceptional - these guys are winners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My company has been w/ RS for over 4 years and has worked with over 20 hosting companies over the last 10 years (we are technology company).  We spend over 2k per month for hosting (multiple boxes) which is well worth it for the level of service we demand.  NO other managed hosting provider has their culture or dedication to customers like RS &#8211; think the Nordstrom&#8217;s customer service model brought to hosting.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m buying the stock based on their strong committment to the customer, you really can&#8217;t find another group with their dedication.  RS is going to be around for many years &#8211; the management team is top shelf, the employees are exceptional &#8211; these guys are winners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Selene</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/26/update-rackspace-files-ipo-will-set-price-via-auction/comment-page-1/#comment-2240162</link>
		<dc:creator>Selene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 22:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/26/update-rackspace-files-ipo-will-set-price-via-auction/#comment-2240162</guid>
		<description>@31 - If you have really seen the actual prospectus, then you probably shouldn&#039;t be posting about it on message boards, since Goldman just told me it has not been made public yet.

What you may be referring to is the S-1 filing with the SEC (available on their web site).  This is a draft registration statement.  You can tell it is a draft because certain numbers, such as the price, are blank.   It is normal to have several of these before the one that is effective.

However, I can&#039;t find anything in there that supports your claim that RAX will not be marketed to institutional investors.  Please figure out what document you are looking at, and (assuming it&#039;s public) let us know what document to go to and what page (the S-1 is over 100 pages).  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@31 &#8211; If you have really seen the actual prospectus, then you probably shouldn&#8217;t be posting about it on message boards, since Goldman just told me it has not been made public yet.</p>
<p>What you may be referring to is the S-1 filing with the SEC (available on their web site).  This is a draft registration statement.  You can tell it is a draft because certain numbers, such as the price, are blank.   It is normal to have several of these before the one that is effective.</p>
<p>However, I can&#8217;t find anything in there that supports your claim that RAX will not be marketed to institutional investors.  Please figure out what document you are looking at, and (assuming it&#8217;s public) let us know what document to go to and what page (the S-1 is over 100 pages).  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miles (SEM iCluck)</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/26/update-rackspace-files-ipo-will-set-price-via-auction/comment-page-1/#comment-2234108</link>
		<dc:creator>Miles (SEM iCluck)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/26/update-rackspace-files-ipo-will-set-price-via-auction/#comment-2234108</guid>
		<description>They just need more rackspace for the more customers coming through their door - good idea for a web hosting company to go IPO but why aren&#039;t they grown to a higher level? And that many customers can bring in that much money?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They just need more rackspace for the more customers coming through their door &#8211; good idea for a web hosting company to go IPO but why aren&#8217;t they grown to a higher level? And that many customers can bring in that much money?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wyatt Lehmenkuler</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/26/update-rackspace-files-ipo-will-set-price-via-auction/comment-page-1/#comment-2231658</link>
		<dc:creator>Wyatt Lehmenkuler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 01:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/26/update-rackspace-files-ipo-will-set-price-via-auction/#comment-2231658</guid>
		<description>So if they want to raise 400 million, what would the stock price have to open at?  Anybody have a guess what the stock price will be first day on the market?

Wyatt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So if they want to raise 400 million, what would the stock price have to open at?  Anybody have a guess what the stock price will be first day on the market?</p>
<p>Wyatt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Period Three Blog &#187; Rackspace files IPO</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/26/update-rackspace-files-ipo-will-set-price-via-auction/comment-page-1/#comment-2230029</link>
		<dc:creator>Period Three Blog &#187; Rackspace files IPO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/26/update-rackspace-files-ipo-will-set-price-via-auction/#comment-2230029</guid>
		<description>[...] Link for more info here. With the filing we also get a clearer picture of Rackspace’s business and financials. Its revenues grew 62 percent last year to $362 million, but it posted net profits of $17.8 million, which were down 10 percent from the year before. Cash flows from operations, though, remained healthy at $105 million last year, up from $61 million in 2006. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Link for more info here. With the filing we also get a clearer picture of Rackspace’s business and financials. Its revenues grew 62 percent last year to $362 million, but it posted net profits of $17.8 million, which were down 10 percent from the year before. Cash flows from operations, though, remained healthy at $105 million last year, up from $61 million in 2006. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rackspace Rocks</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/26/update-rackspace-files-ipo-will-set-price-via-auction/comment-page-1/#comment-2229989</link>
		<dc:creator>Rackspace Rocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/26/update-rackspace-files-ipo-will-set-price-via-auction/#comment-2229989</guid>
		<description>@20 

The difference is Rackspace gets the MOM alert and solves the problem when you are sleeping.  You wake up and enjoy your breakfast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@20 </p>
<p>The difference is Rackspace gets the MOM alert and solves the problem when you are sleeping.  You wake up and enjoy your breakfast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/26/update-rackspace-files-ipo-will-set-price-via-auction/comment-page-1/#comment-2229209</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 06:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/26/update-rackspace-files-ipo-will-set-price-via-auction/#comment-2229209</guid>
		<description>With such a quiet IPO market for venture-backed companies last quarter, it&#039;s at least good to see one braving the waters.  I hope they do well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With such a quiet IPO market for venture-backed companies last quarter, it&#8217;s at least good to see one braving the waters.  I hope they do well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rackspace files for IPO &#187; VentureBeat</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/26/update-rackspace-files-ipo-will-set-price-via-auction/comment-page-1/#comment-2229157</link>
		<dc:creator>Rackspace files for IPO &#187; VentureBeat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 05:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/26/update-rackspace-files-ipo-will-set-price-via-auction/#comment-2229157</guid>
		<description>[...] market, Rackspacehas filed for an IPO. The web-hosting company filed for an IPO late Friday, according to TechCrunch. The company said it will try to raise $400 million and set its price through an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] market, Rackspacehas filed for an IPO. The web-hosting company filed for an IPO late Friday, according to TechCrunch. The company said it will try to raise $400 million and set its price through an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: antonolsen.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rackspace Files IPO, Will Set Price Via Auction</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/26/update-rackspace-files-ipo-will-set-price-via-auction/comment-page-1/#comment-2229129</link>
		<dc:creator>antonolsen.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rackspace Files IPO, Will Set Price Via Auction</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 04:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/26/update-rackspace-files-ipo-will-set-price-via-auction/#comment-2229129</guid>
		<description>[...] Update: Rackspace Files IPO, Will Set Price Via Auction Hosting provider Rackspace filed for an initial public offering with the SEC last night, as we predicted it would. The company will try to raise $400 million, and it intends to set the IPO price through an auction, much like Google did. The underwriters are Goldman Sachs, Merrill Lynch, Credit Suisse, and WR Hambrecht &amp; Co. (the leading proponent of such IPO pricing). Pricing through an auction is designed to make sure the company raises the most money possible instead of giving up a first-day pop to investors who are allocated shares by the investment banks doing the deal. Shares will still be allocated to such clients, but anyone who bids beforehand in the auction at or above the eventual IPO price will also get shares. All in all, it is a much more efficient way to price an IPO and more companies should do it. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Update: Rackspace Files IPO, Will Set Price Via Auction Hosting provider Rackspace filed for an initial public offering with the SEC last night, as we predicted it would. The company will try to raise $400 million, and it intends to set the IPO price through an auction, much like Google did. The underwriters are Goldman Sachs, Merrill Lynch, Credit Suisse, and WR Hambrecht &amp; Co. (the leading proponent of such IPO pricing). Pricing through an auction is designed to make sure the company raises the most money possible instead of giving up a first-day pop to investors who are allocated shares by the investment banks doing the deal. Shares will still be allocated to such clients, but anyone who bids beforehand in the auction at or above the eventual IPO price will also get shares. All in all, it is a much more efficient way to price an IPO and more companies should do it. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What a Joke</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/26/update-rackspace-files-ipo-will-set-price-via-auction/comment-page-1/#comment-2228868</link>
		<dc:creator>What a Joke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 01:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/26/update-rackspace-files-ipo-will-set-price-via-auction/#comment-2228868</guid>
		<description>#29. If you read the prospectus you&#039;d see why Goldman doesn&#039;t want to risk its capital to sell this issue. The other investment banks are selling it through their wealth management divisions (i.e. selling it to individual investors), because they don&#039;t think institutional investors will buy it. Good luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#29. If you read the prospectus you&#8217;d see why Goldman doesn&#8217;t want to risk its capital to sell this issue. The other investment banks are selling it through their wealth management divisions (i.e. selling it to individual investors), because they don&#8217;t think institutional investors will buy it. Good luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Jordan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/26/update-rackspace-files-ipo-will-set-price-via-auction/comment-page-1/#comment-2228825</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 00:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/26/update-rackspace-files-ipo-will-set-price-via-auction/#comment-2228825</guid>
		<description>What I most see happening is that whatever level of service Rackspace has, it will probably go down once it&#039;s public.  As well as the number of employees is likely to drop as well.  I&#039;m sorry to hear they&#039;re selling out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I most see happening is that whatever level of service Rackspace has, it will probably go down once it&#8217;s public.  As well as the number of employees is likely to drop as well.  I&#8217;m sorry to hear they&#8217;re selling out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; Rackspace、SECにIPO申請―株価はオークション方式で決定</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/26/update-rackspace-files-ipo-will-set-price-via-auction/comment-page-1/#comment-2228760</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; Rackspace、SECにIPO申請―株価はオークション方式で決定</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 00:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/26/update-rackspace-files-ipo-will-set-price-via-auction/#comment-2228760</guid>
		<description>[...] [原文へ] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [原文へ] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smitchz</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/26/update-rackspace-files-ipo-will-set-price-via-auction/comment-page-1/#comment-2228752</link>
		<dc:creator>Smitchz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 00:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/26/update-rackspace-files-ipo-will-set-price-via-auction/#comment-2228752</guid>
		<description>28 - It is a management decision to use an auction offering, do a little research on how the game works will you? I&#039;m sure they could have gone the traditional route with no problem. Btw, take a look at some of the past auctions from WRH and they&#039;ve performed their capital raising function quite well.

Personally/professionally, I don&#039;t have any relationship with rackspace and I think it looks attractive enough to consider investing in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>28 &#8211; It is a management decision to use an auction offering, do a little research on how the game works will you? I&#8217;m sure they could have gone the traditional route with no problem. Btw, take a look at some of the past auctions from WRH and they&#8217;ve performed their capital raising function quite well.</p>
<p>Personally/professionally, I don&#8217;t have any relationship with rackspace and I think it looks attractive enough to consider investing in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What a Joke</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/26/update-rackspace-files-ipo-will-set-price-via-auction/comment-page-1/#comment-2228653</link>
		<dc:creator>What a Joke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 23:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/26/update-rackspace-files-ipo-will-set-price-via-auction/#comment-2228653</guid>
		<description>Interesting how the bankers want to dutch auction this issue. They don&#039;t want to take this is deal on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting how the bankers want to dutch auction this issue. They don&#8217;t want to take this is deal on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/26/update-rackspace-files-ipo-will-set-price-via-auction/comment-page-1/#comment-2228299</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 19:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/26/update-rackspace-files-ipo-will-set-price-via-auction/#comment-2228299</guid>
		<description>@Gamerguy what was your server/bandwidth setup with them? I&#039;d like to see how much everything cost. 

Thats one of the big things that I dont like about Rackspace...you can&#039;t even see their prices w/o contacting their sales people which will push you to make their sale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Gamerguy what was your server/bandwidth setup with them? I&#8217;d like to see how much everything cost. </p>
<p>Thats one of the big things that I dont like about Rackspace&#8230;you can&#8217;t even see their prices w/o contacting their sales people which will push you to make their sale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GamerGuy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/26/update-rackspace-files-ipo-will-set-price-via-auction/comment-page-1/#comment-2228249</link>
		<dc:creator>GamerGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 18:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/26/update-rackspace-files-ipo-will-set-price-via-auction/#comment-2228249</guid>
		<description>@Andrew  You are SO right....if anyone is looking for a data centre in the UK...I&#039;ve had the same experience with RapidSwitch....in fact they are faster and more responsive than Rackspace...AND you get 10TB/Month with every server !!  And NO NO I don&#039;t work for Rapidswitch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Andrew  You are SO right&#8230;.if anyone is looking for a data centre in the UK&#8230;I&#8217;ve had the same experience with RapidSwitch&#8230;.in fact they are faster and more responsive than Rackspace&#8230;AND you get 10TB/Month with every server !!  And NO NO I don&#8217;t work for Rapidswitch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GamerGuy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/26/update-rackspace-files-ipo-will-set-price-via-auction/comment-page-1/#comment-2228236</link>
		<dc:creator>GamerGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 18:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/26/update-rackspace-files-ipo-will-set-price-via-auction/#comment-2228236</guid>
		<description>Well..I&#039;ve just sent them a termination notice.  My bandwidth costs had risen to more than $20K per month...I moved web host (didn&#039;t notice that they weren&#039;t as FANATICAL as Rackspace and saved my company $15K per month AT LEAST.   Good luck with your IPO Rackspace (NOT).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well..I&#8217;ve just sent them a termination notice.  My bandwidth costs had risen to more than $20K per month&#8230;I moved web host (didn&#8217;t notice that they weren&#8217;t as FANATICAL as Rackspace and saved my company $15K per month AT LEAST.   Good luck with your IPO Rackspace (NOT).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/26/update-rackspace-files-ipo-will-set-price-via-auction/comment-page-1/#comment-2228046</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 16:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/26/update-rackspace-files-ipo-will-set-price-via-auction/#comment-2228046</guid>
		<description>@20. Yes they have excellent track record, but the truck thing showed that all their guarantees are worthless. They can have the same power outages as any other provider. The only difference is Rackspace will pay you a few pennies for those outages from the start, and other providers will pay you a few pennies after 30 minutes of downtime per year.

And honestly I don&#039;t see Liquid Web as that small. Go on any webmaster forum and its pretty much considered a top level provider, right up there with rackspace. If you ask whats better LW vs [any competitor except Rackspace] you&#039;ll always get that LW is better. And unlike RS they are actually there among the little guys, doing promotions, resolving issues, while RS is nowhere to be found because they don&#039;t give a crap about the little guy and instead focus on big corporate clients. And VC backed startups that have been drinking their koolaid. 

As far as data centers are considered, Liquid Web is already up to 2 datacenters and they don&#039;t seem to have a problem scaling/getting users/keeping the same level of support. 

And honestly, I can&#039;t really see how Rackspace can be that much better than them at service. If I need to call, no matter the time of day I get a response within 2 rings. If I need to email, the first reply comes in 10-20 minutes after which its back and forth like instant messaging through email between myself and the support guy until my issue gets resolved. So what happens with Rackspace? Rackspace picks up a phone after 1 ring? And its 5 minutes instead of 10 for emails? I dunno about you but not getting gouged, not getting nickel and dimed for every little thing, and not getting the high and mighty attitude is worth to me, having to wait that 1 extra ring and that extra 5 minutes for a reply. 

And no I don&#039;t work for Liquid Web, I&#039;m just a VERY satisfied customer who has been treated right from day 1(well day 0 actually, they were just as good and patient when I was asking questions)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@20. Yes they have excellent track record, but the truck thing showed that all their guarantees are worthless. They can have the same power outages as any other provider. The only difference is Rackspace will pay you a few pennies for those outages from the start, and other providers will pay you a few pennies after 30 minutes of downtime per year.</p>
<p>And honestly I don&#8217;t see Liquid Web as that small. Go on any webmaster forum and its pretty much considered a top level provider, right up there with rackspace. If you ask whats better LW vs [any competitor except Rackspace] you&#8217;ll always get that LW is better. And unlike RS they are actually there among the little guys, doing promotions, resolving issues, while RS is nowhere to be found because they don&#8217;t give a crap about the little guy and instead focus on big corporate clients. And VC backed startups that have been drinking their koolaid. </p>
<p>As far as data centers are considered, Liquid Web is already up to 2 datacenters and they don&#8217;t seem to have a problem scaling/getting users/keeping the same level of support. </p>
<p>And honestly, I can&#8217;t really see how Rackspace can be that much better than them at service. If I need to call, no matter the time of day I get a response within 2 rings. If I need to email, the first reply comes in 10-20 minutes after which its back and forth like instant messaging through email between myself and the support guy until my issue gets resolved. So what happens with Rackspace? Rackspace picks up a phone after 1 ring? And its 5 minutes instead of 10 for emails? I dunno about you but not getting gouged, not getting nickel and dimed for every little thing, and not getting the high and mighty attitude is worth to me, having to wait that 1 extra ring and that extra 5 minutes for a reply. </p>
<p>And no I don&#8217;t work for Liquid Web, I&#8217;m just a VERY satisfied customer who has been treated right from day 1(well day 0 actually, they were just as good and patient when I was asking questions)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ummm...</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/26/update-rackspace-files-ipo-will-set-price-via-auction/comment-page-1/#comment-2228039</link>
		<dc:creator>ummm...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 16:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/26/update-rackspace-files-ipo-will-set-price-via-auction/#comment-2228039</guid>
		<description>Erick - &quot;Revenue per square foot&quot; (which you suggest is important) is a hilarious metric -- the servers are stacked vertically too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erick &#8211; &#8220;Revenue per square foot&#8221; (which you suggest is important) is a hilarious metric &#8212; the servers are stacked vertically too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
