<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pageflakes Acquisition Confirmed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/pageflakes-acquisition-confirmed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/pageflakes-acquisition-confirmed/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 20:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Netvibes CEO Steps Down; Widget Platform Will Open Up</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/pageflakes-acquisition-confirmed/#comment-2334407</link>
		<dc:creator>Netvibes CEO Steps Down; Widget Platform Will Open Up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 22:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/pageflakes-acquisition-confirmed/#comment-2334407</guid>
		<description>[...] page, but fighting against My Yahoo and iGoogle is a losing battle. (Competitor Pageflakes recently sold itself rather than continue to go it alone, for instance). In April, Netvibes showed a dip in unique [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] page, but fighting against My Yahoo and iGoogle is a losing battle. (Competitor Pageflakes recently sold itself rather than continue to go it alone, for instance). In April, Netvibes showed a dip in unique [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ONLINE SERVICES/INTERACTIVE MEDIA &#171; Daily Marauder</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/pageflakes-acquisition-confirmed/#comment-2283856</link>
		<dc:creator>ONLINE SERVICES/INTERACTIVE MEDIA &#171; Daily Marauder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 19:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/pageflakes-acquisition-confirmed/#comment-2283856</guid>
		<description>[...] MeeVee, we’re heard from multiple sources. This comes less than a month after they announced the acquisition of Pageflakes, another northern California startup. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] MeeVee, we’re heard from multiple sources. This comes less than a month after they announced the acquisition of Pageflakes, another northern California startup. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MeeVee Finds A Home, Acquired By Live Universe</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/pageflakes-acquisition-confirmed/#comment-2282014</link>
		<dc:creator>MeeVee Finds A Home, Acquired By Live Universe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 23:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/pageflakes-acquisition-confirmed/#comment-2282014</guid>
		<description>[...] we&#8217;re heard from multiple sources. This comes less than a month after they announced the acquisition of Pageflakes, another northern California [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we&#8217;re heard from multiple sources. This comes less than a month after they announced the acquisition of Pageflakes, another northern California [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What PageFlakes Does In Life Echoes In A LiveUniverse</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/pageflakes-acquisition-confirmed/#comment-2199246</link>
		<dc:creator>What PageFlakes Does In Life Echoes In A LiveUniverse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 17:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/pageflakes-acquisition-confirmed/#comment-2199246</guid>
		<description>[...] Source: [1] TechCrunch: Pageflakes Acquisition Confirmed by Erick Schonfeld  SPHERE IT!   Categories: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source: [1] TechCrunch: Pageflakes Acquisition Confirmed by Erick Schonfeld  SPHERE IT!   Categories: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inbal</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/pageflakes-acquisition-confirmed/#comment-2198919</link>
		<dc:creator>Inbal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 16:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/pageflakes-acquisition-confirmed/#comment-2198919</guid>
		<description>Skiba,

The social features of start pages haven't worked mainly because their user base is dramatically inferior to that of the big social networks, and as long as they're unable to interact with those networks, most people will stay wherever their friends are. Opening the lines of communication in this field would change things completely, but as it never happened for instant messaging, I'm not holding my breath.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skiba,</p>
<p>The social features of start pages haven&#8217;t worked mainly because their user base is dramatically inferior to that of the big social networks, and as long as they&#8217;re unable to interact with those networks, most people will stay wherever their friends are. Opening the lines of communication in this field would change things completely, but as it never happened for instant messaging, I&#8217;m not holding my breath.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/pageflakes-acquisition-confirmed/#comment-2198599</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 16:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/pageflakes-acquisition-confirmed/#comment-2198599</guid>
		<description>@ Robert (37) Thanks, do you know we can join  the beta test group? I've signed in through your link, and now I want to give feedback.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Robert (37) Thanks, do you know we can join  the beta test group? I&#8217;ve signed in through your link, and now I want to give feedback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert S. Robbins</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/pageflakes-acquisition-confirmed/#comment-2195804</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert S. Robbins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 10:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/pageflakes-acquisition-confirmed/#comment-2195804</guid>
		<description>You can already preview how the LiveVideo / Pageflakes integration is going work by going to the beta site at: http://livevideo.pageflakes.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can already preview how the LiveVideo / Pageflakes integration is going work by going to the beta site at: <a href="http://livevideo.pageflakes.com/" rel="nofollow">http://livevideo.pageflakes.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; PageflakesがLive Universeに正式に買収される。</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/pageflakes-acquisition-confirmed/#comment-2193089</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; PageflakesがLive Universeに正式に買収される。</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 00:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/pageflakes-acquisition-confirmed/#comment-2193089</guid>
		<description>[...] [原文へ] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [原文へ] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric T.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/pageflakes-acquisition-confirmed/#comment-2193020</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 23:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/pageflakes-acquisition-confirmed/#comment-2193020</guid>
		<description>The Live Universe and Pageflakes deal is very exciting!  Can't wait to see Pageflakes' growth after the Live Video deal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Live Universe and Pageflakes deal is very exciting!  Can&#8217;t wait to see Pageflakes&#8217; growth after the Live Video deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skiba</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/pageflakes-acquisition-confirmed/#comment-2192949</link>
		<dc:creator>Skiba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 23:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/pageflakes-acquisition-confirmed/#comment-2192949</guid>
		<description>Robert (26) - I am thinking the same thing. With Ginger, Netvibes is out there adding a social network to a personalized start page, while LiveVideo is adding a personalized start page to a social network. I heard a rumour that iGoogle will bring Opern Social in as well.

Once Facebook had tens of millions of users, they launched an open developer widget platform. This was basically a personal widget homepage added to the product. That’s been really succesful. So, if you think about it, it’s really smart to add widget aggregation and personalization to social networks, which is exactly what LiveUniverse is doing. I don’t think it makes sense to add a social network to a start page, though, which both Pageflakes and Netvibes have done, apparently with little success.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert (26) - I am thinking the same thing. With Ginger, Netvibes is out there adding a social network to a personalized start page, while LiveVideo is adding a personalized start page to a social network. I heard a rumour that iGoogle will bring Opern Social in as well.</p>
<p>Once Facebook had tens of millions of users, they launched an open developer widget platform. This was basically a personal widget homepage added to the product. That’s been really succesful. So, if you think about it, it’s really smart to add widget aggregation and personalization to social networks, which is exactly what LiveUniverse is doing. I don’t think it makes sense to add a social network to a start page, though, which both Pageflakes and Netvibes have done, apparently with little success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skiba</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/pageflakes-acquisition-confirmed/#comment-2192944</link>
		<dc:creator>Skiba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 23:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/pageflakes-acquisition-confirmed/#comment-2192944</guid>
		<description>Robert (26) - I am thinking the same thing.  With Ginger, Netvibes is out there adding a social network to a personalized start page, while LiveVideo is adding a personalized start page to a social network.   I heard a rumour that iGoogle will bring Opern Social in as well.

Once had tens of millions of users, they launched an open developer widget platform.  This was basically a personal widget homepage added to the product.  That's been really succesful.  So, if you think about it, it's really smart to add widget aggregation and personalization to social networks, which is exactly what LiveUniverse is doing.  I don't think it makes sense to add a social network to a start page, though, which both Pageflakes and Netvibes have done, apparently with little success.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert (26) - I am thinking the same thing.  With Ginger, Netvibes is out there adding a social network to a personalized start page, while LiveVideo is adding a personalized start page to a social network.   I heard a rumour that iGoogle will bring Opern Social in as well.</p>
<p>Once had tens of millions of users, they launched an open developer widget platform.  This was basically a personal widget homepage added to the product.  That&#8217;s been really succesful.  So, if you think about it, it&#8217;s really smart to add widget aggregation and personalization to social networks, which is exactly what LiveUniverse is doing.  I don&#8217;t think it makes sense to add a social network to a start page, though, which both Pageflakes and Netvibes have done, apparently with little success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VultureCap</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/pageflakes-acquisition-confirmed/#comment-2192804</link>
		<dc:creator>VultureCap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 22:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/pageflakes-acquisition-confirmed/#comment-2192804</guid>
		<description>@ Sean #29 - the reason for the big traffic jump at Netvibes was, as said in the article, a distribution deal with toolbar/spyware company MIVA (my.alot.com), where they have a whitelabel version of Netvibes.  I checked this out in Comscore and it looks like my.alot.com and Netvibes had a spike right at the same time that alot.com launched.  It looks like an iFrame implementation, so users see my.alot.com but the "hit" also counts to netvibes.com (double count).  If you look at the Comscore source/loss report, you'll see that by far the #1 source of Netvibes traffic is alot.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Sean #29 - the reason for the big traffic jump at Netvibes was, as said in the article, a distribution deal with toolbar/spyware company MIVA (my.alot.com), where they have a whitelabel version of Netvibes.  I checked this out in Comscore and it looks like my.alot.com and Netvibes had a spike right at the same time that alot.com launched.  It looks like an iFrame implementation, so users see my.alot.com but the &#8220;hit&#8221; also counts to netvibes.com (double count).  If you look at the Comscore source/loss report, you&#8217;ll see that by far the #1 source of Netvibes traffic is alot.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee B</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/pageflakes-acquisition-confirmed/#comment-2192175</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 20:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/pageflakes-acquisition-confirmed/#comment-2192175</guid>
		<description>I think everyone's so wrapped up in widgets they're missing the point with start pages.  I want usabilty and versatility, so much in 2.0-land IMVHO is prescriptive.

I don't want to have to choose just widgets, or just feeds, or a to do list that does nothing else (unless it's gorgeous and extremely usable like http://www.gubb.net)

My start page is http://www.symbaloo.com - I've had a look at most of the others and none give me the range of options that Symbaloo does.  I don't think I've heard it praised on TechCrunch yet but maybe I missed it...?

And for what it's worth I wish people would get away from talking just about stats.  These explosions in traffic and user figures usually mean one thing - they're not here to stay.  Far better to build a smaller audience/userbase of people that love your site rather than millions of ignorant people that don't know how to look around for something better.

Rant over.  Go and sign up to Symbaloo [and no I'm not affiliated, just very much in love :)]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think everyone&#8217;s so wrapped up in widgets they&#8217;re missing the point with start pages.  I want usabilty and versatility, so much in 2.0-land IMVHO is prescriptive.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want to have to choose just widgets, or just feeds, or a to do list that does nothing else (unless it&#8217;s gorgeous and extremely usable like <a href="http://www.gubb.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.gubb.net</a>)</p>
<p>My start page is <a href="http://www.symbaloo.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.symbaloo.com</a> - I&#8217;ve had a look at most of the others and none give me the range of options that Symbaloo does.  I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve heard it praised on TechCrunch yet but maybe I missed it&#8230;?</p>
<p>And for what it&#8217;s worth I wish people would get away from talking just about stats.  These explosions in traffic and user figures usually mean one thing - they&#8217;re not here to stay.  Far better to build a smaller audience/userbase of people that love your site rather than millions of ignorant people that don&#8217;t know how to look around for something better.</p>
<p>Rant over.  Go and sign up to Symbaloo [and no I'm not affiliated, just very much in love :)]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vijay</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/pageflakes-acquisition-confirmed/#comment-2192061</link>
		<dc:creator>Vijay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 20:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/pageflakes-acquisition-confirmed/#comment-2192061</guid>
		<description>One more home page startup....
http://www.GetMeValue.com/flavorHome.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more home page startup&#8230;.<br />
<a href="http://www.GetMeValue.com/flavorHome.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.GetMeValue.com/flavorHome.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Caulfield</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/pageflakes-acquisition-confirmed/#comment-2191983</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Caulfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 20:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/pageflakes-acquisition-confirmed/#comment-2191983</guid>
		<description>Cue TC user "* Miss Universe" to leave a comment urging all of to believe that Brad Greenspan is the second coming and that TechCrunch should do an interview with him. 

I wonder who "* Miss Universe" might be? Hmmm...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cue TC user &#8220;* Miss Universe&#8221; to leave a comment urging all of to believe that Brad Greenspan is the second coming and that TechCrunch should do an interview with him. </p>
<p>I wonder who &#8220;* Miss Universe&#8221; might be? Hmmm&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ErickFan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/pageflakes-acquisition-confirmed/#comment-2191331</link>
		<dc:creator>ErickFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/pageflakes-acquisition-confirmed/#comment-2191331</guid>
		<description>Erick,

Any idea what is the cash amount they got paid ? 

thnx.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erick,</p>
<p>Any idea what is the cash amount they got paid ? </p>
<p>thnx.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/pageflakes-acquisition-confirmed/#comment-2191227</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/pageflakes-acquisition-confirmed/#comment-2191227</guid>
		<description>Wow what happened with Netvibes in August 2007? Their traffic skyrocketed. I don't remember any big stories about them from that time, but that doesn't mean anything really...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow what happened with Netvibes in August 2007? Their traffic skyrocketed. I don&#8217;t remember any big stories about them from that time, but that doesn&#8217;t mean anything really&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Jenkins</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/pageflakes-acquisition-confirmed/#comment-2191008</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Jenkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/pageflakes-acquisition-confirmed/#comment-2191008</guid>
		<description>BIG LIVE SHOUT OUT TO EMMA!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BIG LIVE SHOUT OUT TO EMMA!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Blue</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/pageflakes-acquisition-confirmed/#comment-2190534</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Blue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 16:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/pageflakes-acquisition-confirmed/#comment-2190534</guid>
		<description>to Emma:  You have to think about it from TechCrunch's viewpoint.  #1 TC's business model is based on pageviews/uniques so that will always be important to them.  #2. A headline that mentions a more visited(popular) website is more likely to be read.

So, of course, that will be their primary focus.

Still, that doesn't change the fact that we(myself, you, and I imagine others) would be interested in articles about lesser known companies(anyone can find info about Pageflakes) that are profitable.  Especially those companies that aren't venture funded.  Anybody can generate revenue if they are given $4M.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to Emma:  You have to think about it from TechCrunch&#8217;s viewpoint.  #1 TC&#8217;s business model is based on pageviews/uniques so that will always be important to them.  #2. A headline that mentions a more visited(popular) website is more likely to be read.</p>
<p>So, of course, that will be their primary focus.</p>
<p>Still, that doesn&#8217;t change the fact that we(myself, you, and I imagine others) would be interested in articles about lesser known companies(anyone can find info about Pageflakes) that are profitable.  Especially those companies that aren&#8217;t venture funded.  Anybody can generate revenue if they are given $4M.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert S. Robbins</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/pageflakes-acquisition-confirmed/#comment-2190350</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert S. Robbins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 16:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/pageflakes-acquisition-confirmed/#comment-2190350</guid>
		<description>I've used PageFlakes and LiveVideo. The most interesting line in this article is that PageFlakes will be integrated into LiveVideo! I remember doing a video and bulletin about Web Parts on LiveVideo and sent in a suggestion that they give users the option to mash up RSS feeds on user profile pages. I wonder if this is an attempt to implement that idea? It certainly will make LiveVideo your one stop communications headquarters on the Internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve used PageFlakes and LiveVideo. The most interesting line in this article is that PageFlakes will be integrated into LiveVideo! I remember doing a video and bulletin about Web Parts on LiveVideo and sent in a suggestion that they give users the option to mash up RSS feeds on user profile pages. I wonder if this is an attempt to implement that idea? It certainly will make LiveVideo your one stop communications headquarters on the Internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/pageflakes-acquisition-confirmed/#comment-2190089</link>
		<dc:creator>G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 16:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/pageflakes-acquisition-confirmed/#comment-2190089</guid>
		<description>I would say the #1 requirement for a start page is speed. This personalized start pages drawing content from other sources are never going to have a satisfactory load time for the average user. 

Thats why a lot of people have simply set google as their start page. Personally my start page is set to officialhomepage.org (which i found thro a ad in techcruch btb)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say the #1 requirement for a start page is speed. This personalized start pages drawing content from other sources are never going to have a satisfactory load time for the average user. </p>
<p>Thats why a lot of people have simply set google as their start page. Personally my start page is set to officialhomepage.org (which i found thro a ad in techcruch btb)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/pageflakes-acquisition-confirmed/#comment-2189822</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/pageflakes-acquisition-confirmed/#comment-2189822</guid>
		<description>I'm really not sure that 191,000 users is the issue though is it. Although that's not a global figure anywhere, and there are plenty of UK users. Surely what's more important is how useful it is? And it is - very. Not only is the concept good, it is easy to use - I have people up and running with Pageflakes inside 5 minutes - but it is clearly better than Netvibes in countless ways. 

I'm hopeful that this deal will ensure that Pageflakes is able to expand and increase the user base and add even more use and functionality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m really not sure that 191,000 users is the issue though is it. Although that&#8217;s not a global figure anywhere, and there are plenty of UK users. Surely what&#8217;s more important is how useful it is? And it is - very. Not only is the concept good, it is easy to use - I have people up and running with Pageflakes inside 5 minutes - but it is clearly better than Netvibes in countless ways. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m hopeful that this deal will ensure that Pageflakes is able to expand and increase the user base and add even more use and functionality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enrique</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/pageflakes-acquisition-confirmed/#comment-2189797</link>
		<dc:creator>Enrique</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/pageflakes-acquisition-confirmed/#comment-2189797</guid>
		<description>They have been working on OPML export feature for years. I remember requesting that more than an year back. 

http://www.pageflakes.com/insider/?p=56#comment-74

No wonder why people leave.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They have been working on OPML export feature for years. I remember requesting that more than an year back. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.pageflakes.com/insider/?p=56#comment-74" rel="nofollow">http://www.pageflakes.com/insider/?p=56#comment-74</a></p>
<p>No wonder why people leave.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eclw - 1n191k :)</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/pageflakes-acquisition-confirmed/#comment-2189653</link>
		<dc:creator>eclw - 1n191k :)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 14:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/pageflakes-acquisition-confirmed/#comment-2189653</guid>
		<description>I access this blog through pageflakes. It's a nice gui, it loads fast. Proud to be one of the 191k.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I access this blog through pageflakes. It&#8217;s a nice gui, it loads fast. Proud to be one of the 191k.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raef</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/pageflakes-acquisition-confirmed/#comment-2189640</link>
		<dc:creator>Raef</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 14:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/18/pageflakes-acquisition-confirmed/#comment-2189640</guid>
		<description>Is anything new in the in the world of start pages destined to be a "perennial also-ran"? I hope not. I just launched quick.as and I have a measly 400 uniques ... although granted the press release went out about 6 hours ago! 

I agree with some of the criticism in the comments above regarding numbers not necessarily being the best measure of success. It is all relative to the site and what it is you are doing. I spent a month developing quick.as off the smell of an oily rag so I'd be rapt with 191,000 uniques a month! 

At the same time, I appreciate hearing about the numbers of uniques start-up are doing as while it is not the best measure of success, it is a pretty important one!

Another point. From a users point of view (and hence business viability) I question the value of these highly customizable, cluttered, slow loading start pages. I have tried them all in the past and become too frustrated with how slow they can become. Obviously it depends what you put on there, but I found it was easier just going to the source site to find whatever content you were after. That was part of the rationale for quick.as. Don't people want a a start page that allows you to quickly go to a site that gives you content, rather than trying to deliver content like Pageflakes, Netvives, et al.?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is anything new in the in the world of start pages destined to be a &#8220;perennial also-ran&#8221;? I hope not. I just launched quick.as and I have a measly 400 uniques &#8230; although granted the press release went out about 6 hours ago! </p>
<p>I agree with some of the criticism in the comments above regarding numbers not necessarily being the best measure of success. It is all relative to the site and what it is you are doing. I spent a month developing quick.as off the smell of an oily rag so I&#8217;d be rapt with 191,000 uniques a month! </p>
<p>At the same time, I appreciate hearing about the numbers of uniques start-up are doing as while it is not the best measure of success, it is a pretty important one!</p>
<p>Another point. From a users point of view (and hence business viability) I question the value of these highly customizable, cluttered, slow loading start pages. I have tried them all in the past and become too frustrated with how slow they can become. Obviously it depends what you put on there, but I found it was easier just going to the source site to find whatever content you were after. That was part of the rationale for quick.as. Don&#8217;t people want a a start page that allows you to quickly go to a site that gives you content, rather than trying to deliver content like Pageflakes, Netvives, et al.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.106 seconds -->
