<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TwitLinks: Not Useful, Not A TechMeme Killer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/14/yeah-twitlinks-isnt-useful/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/14/yeah-twitlinks-isnt-useful/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 18:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jonas</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/14/yeah-twitlinks-isnt-useful/#comment-2232884</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/14/yeah-twitlinks-isnt-useful/#comment-2232884</guid>
		<description>Twitlinks for Jaiku: http://jaiklinks.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitlinks for Jaiku: <a href="http://jaiklinks.com" rel="nofollow">http://jaiklinks.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitturly Cracks The TwitterMeme Nut</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/14/yeah-twitlinks-isnt-useful/#comment-2229910</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitturly Cracks The TwitterMeme Nut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/14/yeah-twitlinks-isnt-useful/#comment-2229910</guid>
		<description>[...] going to necessarily see the breaking news. Services like TwitLinks have launched recently that utterly failed to solve the problem, despite excitement from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] going to necessarily see the breaking news. Services like TwitLinks have launched recently that utterly failed to solve the problem, despite excitement from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Making something people want &#171; Scoopler</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/14/yeah-twitlinks-isnt-useful/#comment-2208171</link>
		<dc:creator>Making something people want &#171; Scoopler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 18:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/14/yeah-twitlinks-isnt-useful/#comment-2208171</guid>
		<description>[...] where users can highlight posts about interesting events in real time. As Mike Arrington points out, Twitter is already a great source of breaking news, because the real time nature of microblogging [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] where users can highlight posts about interesting events in real time. As Mike Arrington points out, Twitter is already a great source of breaking news, because the real time nature of microblogging [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurent&#8217;s blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Around the web this week</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/14/yeah-twitlinks-isnt-useful/#comment-2205397</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurent&#8217;s blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Around the web this week</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 22:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/14/yeah-twitlinks-isnt-useful/#comment-2205397</guid>
		<description>[...] of today) and extract the links from their tweets transforming them in a blog like page. It seems not to be enough, hopefully they will add some brain to it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of today) and extract the links from their tweets transforming them in a blog like page. It seems not to be enough, hopefully they will add some brain to it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: av-pag.com &#187; Alpha Twitter el del.icio.us de Twitter</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/14/yeah-twitlinks-isnt-useful/#comment-2193661</link>
		<dc:creator>av-pag.com &#187; Alpha Twitter el del.icio.us de Twitter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 04:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/14/yeah-twitlinks-isnt-useful/#comment-2193661</guid>
		<description>[...] vemos AlphaTwitter en Techcrunch, AlphaTwitter es otro mashup de Twitter, esta vez desarrollado por Luis Figueiredo un programador [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] vemos AlphaTwitter en Techcrunch, AlphaTwitter es otro mashup de Twitter, esta vez desarrollado por Luis Figueiredo un programador [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Day 85: Making something people want &#124; projectbluespark.com: Chronicles of a Young Entrepreneur</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/14/yeah-twitlinks-isnt-useful/#comment-2181474</link>
		<dc:creator>Day 85: Making something people want &#124; projectbluespark.com: Chronicles of a Young Entrepreneur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 02:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/14/yeah-twitlinks-isnt-useful/#comment-2181474</guid>
		<description>[...] where users can highlight posts about interesting events in real time. As Mike Arrington points out, Twitter is already a great source of breaking news, because the real time nature of microblogging [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] where users can highlight posts about interesting events in real time. As Mike Arrington points out, Twitter is already a great source of breaking news, because the real time nature of microblogging [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What&#8217;s New Today - April 15th, 2008 &#187; To Be A Geek: Not Just Another Wordpress Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/14/yeah-twitlinks-isnt-useful/#comment-2180218</link>
		<dc:creator>What&#8217;s New Today - April 15th, 2008 &#187; To Be A Geek: Not Just Another Wordpress Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/14/yeah-twitlinks-isnt-useful/#comment-2180218</guid>
		<description>[...] PlayStation 3 2.30 Update is Live - New PlayStation Store and DTS-HD Master Audio - Gizmodo TwitLinks: Not Useful, Not A TechMeme Killer - TechCrunch Blockbuster Tries to Buy Circuit City - NewTeeVee      (No Ratings Yet)       digg_url [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PlayStation 3 2.30 Update is Live - New PlayStation Store and DTS-HD Master Audio - Gizmodo TwitLinks: Not Useful, Not A TechMeme Killer - TechCrunch Blockbuster Tries to Buy Circuit City - NewTeeVee      (No Ratings Yet)       digg_url [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2008-04-15 &#171; Breyten&#8217;s Dev Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/14/yeah-twitlinks-isnt-useful/#comment-2178844</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2008-04-15 &#171; Breyten&#8217;s Dev Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 11:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/14/yeah-twitlinks-isnt-useful/#comment-2178844</guid>
		<description>[...] TwitLinks: Not Useful, Not A TechMeme Killer (tags: company &#38; product profiles quotably tweetmeme twitlinks twitter) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TwitLinks: Not Useful, Not A TechMeme Killer (tags: company &amp; product profiles quotably tweetmeme twitlinks twitter) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dailytwitter</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/14/yeah-twitlinks-isnt-useful/#comment-2177825</link>
		<dc:creator>dailytwitter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 06:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/14/yeah-twitlinks-isnt-useful/#comment-2177825</guid>
		<description>twitlinks is a good start at trying to pull together a disparate and chaotic communication medium. it will mature I am sure, as the critics espouse their displeasure at how it functions - thats easy, any puppet can do that. 

maybe something like dailytwitter when it finally goes into beta with go towards some of that data mining?

http://blog.dailytwitter.com/?p=41

daliytwitter...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>twitlinks is a good start at trying to pull together a disparate and chaotic communication medium. it will mature I am sure, as the critics espouse their displeasure at how it functions - thats easy, any puppet can do that. </p>
<p>maybe something like dailytwitter when it finally goes into beta with go towards some of that data mining?</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.dailytwitter.com/?p=41" rel="nofollow">http://blog.dailytwitter.com/?p=41</a></p>
<p>daliytwitter&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: handbag</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/14/yeah-twitlinks-isnt-useful/#comment-2177780</link>
		<dc:creator>handbag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 05:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/14/yeah-twitlinks-isnt-useful/#comment-2177780</guid>
		<description>:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frames</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/14/yeah-twitlinks-isnt-useful/#comment-2177777</link>
		<dc:creator>frames</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 05:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/14/yeah-twitlinks-isnt-useful/#comment-2177777</guid>
		<description>TwitLinks good</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TwitLinks good</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MeatyREADS &#187; Twitter is the First News</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/14/yeah-twitlinks-isnt-useful/#comment-2177665</link>
		<dc:creator>MeatyREADS &#187; Twitter is the First News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 05:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/14/yeah-twitlinks-isnt-useful/#comment-2177665</guid>
		<description>[...] never even heard of Twitter, let alone know its value for breaking news. Michael Arrington of TechCrunch says: It’s clear that Twitter is the place that a lot of news breaks first (example), hours before [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] never even heard of Twitter, let alone know its value for breaking news. Michael Arrington of TechCrunch says: It’s clear that Twitter is the place that a lot of news breaks first (example), hours before [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/14/yeah-twitlinks-isnt-useful/#comment-2177358</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 03:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/14/yeah-twitlinks-isnt-useful/#comment-2177358</guid>
		<description>I'll roll with #22 a bit - alltop (gosh -- i can't believe i'm about to say this) has already proven.....useful &#60;gulp&#62; to me...and just a few days ago it was the cat's pee.

Way to go, Guy - I suck! You rule! Or the day laborers you paid to put that site together for you rule.  :)

Watch our, haters - you're time is coming! It buuurrrrrrns. Be careful with the hate!

That said, does this Twitterish site actually do anything? No.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll roll with #22 a bit - alltop (gosh &#8212; i can&#8217;t believe i&#8217;m about to say this) has already proven&#8230;..useful &lt;gulp&gt; to me&#8230;and just a few days ago it was the cat&#8217;s pee.</p>
<p>Way to go, Guy - I suck! You rule! Or the day laborers you paid to put that site together for you rule.  <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Watch our, haters - you&#8217;re time is coming! It buuurrrrrrns. Be careful with the hate!</p>
<p>That said, does this Twitterish site actually do anything? No.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casey Cuddy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/14/yeah-twitlinks-isnt-useful/#comment-2176692</link>
		<dc:creator>Casey Cuddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/14/yeah-twitlinks-isnt-useful/#comment-2176692</guid>
		<description>TechCrunch wasn't all that valuable, or feature perfect, or well-defined in the beginning either. Truth is that heavy news consumers are migrating AWAY from the origin to the aggregators. TwitLinks is yet another with credibility behind its human filters. The question becomes, what is the credibility of the human "expert" filter posting links, which is not to say that Michael has none in his assessment (obv). However, it is to say that the mere act of spamming TwitLinks to prove that it can be done validates that it is the human filter that is the ORIGIN of any potential problem.

Can't we stop asking technology to do EVERYTHING, and take some responsibility for our own approach, interests and behaviors in influencing how effective certain apps, and the medium overall, become in helping us to navigate the flood? TwitLinks is only as helpful as its contributors, so be helpful, please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TechCrunch wasn&#8217;t all that valuable, or feature perfect, or well-defined in the beginning either. Truth is that heavy news consumers are migrating AWAY from the origin to the aggregators. TwitLinks is yet another with credibility behind its human filters. The question becomes, what is the credibility of the human &#8220;expert&#8221; filter posting links, which is not to say that Michael has none in his assessment (obv). However, it is to say that the mere act of spamming TwitLinks to prove that it can be done validates that it is the human filter that is the ORIGIN of any potential problem.</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t we stop asking technology to do EVERYTHING, and take some responsibility for our own approach, interests and behaviors in influencing how effective certain apps, and the medium overall, become in helping us to navigate the flood? TwitLinks is only as helpful as its contributors, so be helpful, please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard MacManus</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/14/yeah-twitlinks-isnt-useful/#comment-2176413</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard MacManus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/14/yeah-twitlinks-isnt-useful/#comment-2176413</guid>
		<description>Bam wrote: "so we now found out RWW probably got paid to write that post. even if they didn’t, they certainly cheated us!"

I missed the part where you explained the logic for that :-) Anyway I can confirm that we weren't paid to write about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bam wrote: &#8220;so we now found out RWW probably got paid to write that post. even if they didn’t, they certainly cheated us!&#8221;</p>
<p>I missed the part where you explained the logic for that <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> Anyway I can confirm that we weren&#8217;t paid to write about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D.L.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/14/yeah-twitlinks-isnt-useful/#comment-2176377</link>
		<dc:creator>D.L.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/14/yeah-twitlinks-isnt-useful/#comment-2176377</guid>
		<description>Is there going to be any friction with Leo over the Twit name?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there going to be any friction with Leo over the Twit name?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pte</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/14/yeah-twitlinks-isnt-useful/#comment-2176343</link>
		<dc:creator>pte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/14/yeah-twitlinks-isnt-useful/#comment-2176343</guid>
		<description>michael to remove competitions for his friends?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>michael to remove competitions for his friends?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ely Fall</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/14/yeah-twitlinks-isnt-useful/#comment-2176342</link>
		<dc:creator>Ely Fall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/14/yeah-twitlinks-isnt-useful/#comment-2176342</guid>
		<description>The nice thing about Twitter Apps is the majority serve a purpose, and they are more creative&#38;useful than 95% of Facebook applications. I still wonder why there is no Twitter Apps Fund yet</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The nice thing about Twitter Apps is the majority serve a purpose, and they are more creative&amp;useful than 95% of Facebook applications. I still wonder why there is no Twitter Apps Fund yet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/14/yeah-twitlinks-isnt-useful/#comment-2176258</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/14/yeah-twitlinks-isnt-useful/#comment-2176258</guid>
		<description>@michael - The links haven't been removed, they are further down the page. Thanks for highlighting a problem with twitlinks which I will try and get fixed :)


@Bam - RWW didn't get paid to write that post :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@michael - The links haven&#8217;t been removed, they are further down the page. Thanks for highlighting a problem with twitlinks which I will try and get fixed <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>@Bam - RWW didn&#8217;t get paid to write that post <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/14/yeah-twitlinks-isnt-useful/#comment-2176225</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/14/yeah-twitlinks-isnt-useful/#comment-2176225</guid>
		<description>@Tony - Exactly how long have you been reading this blog?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tony - Exactly how long have you been reading this blog?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bam Azizi</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/14/yeah-twitlinks-isnt-useful/#comment-2176160</link>
		<dc:creator>Bam Azizi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/14/yeah-twitlinks-isnt-useful/#comment-2176160</guid>
		<description>so we now found out RWW probably got paid to write that post. even if they didn't, they certainly cheated us!  but that's doesn't make Michael Arrington the saint either!

Blog and blogers are killing the very thing that made them so popular among people, which used to be unbiased, raw and honest attention to their passion and people's precious time. But now, every tech blog is fighting for a bit of extra attention, killing somebody else's fling and expanding into different markets while killing other blogs, sounds too much like the good old corporate world.

i hope me and my own blog would never become this... disgusting!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so we now found out RWW probably got paid to write that post. even if they didn&#8217;t, they certainly cheated us!  but that&#8217;s doesn&#8217;t make Michael Arrington the saint either!</p>
<p>Blog and blogers are killing the very thing that made them so popular among people, which used to be unbiased, raw and honest attention to their passion and people&#8217;s precious time. But now, every tech blog is fighting for a bit of extra attention, killing somebody else&#8217;s fling and expanding into different markets while killing other blogs, sounds too much like the good old corporate world.</p>
<p>i hope me and my own blog would never become this&#8230; disgusting!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/14/yeah-twitlinks-isnt-useful/#comment-2176121</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 21:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/14/yeah-twitlinks-isnt-useful/#comment-2176121</guid>
		<description>I like that Arrington is blunt.  Too many tech blogs sugarcoat things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like that Arrington is blunt.  Too many tech blogs sugarcoat things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis Figueiredo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/14/yeah-twitlinks-isnt-useful/#comment-2175961</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Figueiredo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 21:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/14/yeah-twitlinks-isnt-useful/#comment-2175961</guid>
		<description>There something out there already that may be what you're looking for: http://www.alphatwitter.com
Check it out</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There something out there already that may be what you&#8217;re looking for: <a href="http://www.alphatwitter.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.alphatwitter.com</a><br />
Check it out</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Arrington</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/14/yeah-twitlinks-isnt-useful/#comment-2175956</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Arrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 21:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/14/yeah-twitlinks-isnt-useful/#comment-2175956</guid>
		<description>They've removed the spammy links that I put in, but it's obvious that they did it manually. That doesn't scale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;ve removed the spammy links that I put in, but it&#8217;s obvious that they did it manually. That doesn&#8217;t scale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle MacRae</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/14/yeah-twitlinks-isnt-useful/#comment-2175914</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle MacRae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 21:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/14/yeah-twitlinks-isnt-useful/#comment-2175914</guid>
		<description>I was trying to do something like this a couple of weeks ago - filtering and aggregating tweets on the basis of how many people 'star' them. So if 200 people star the same tweet, it's likely to appear in the current 'most popular' list. Lists refreshed continually to ensure freshness, all-time top charts, archive, categorization etc etc. What you have then is a quality filter to cut through the noise.

It's also a level playing field in the sense that a star from Mike Arrington carries no more weight than a star from, well, me or anybody else. But there is weighting of sorts, of course, because those people with the most followers are more likely to attract stars from their followers. Probably have to filter out the obvious system-gamers.

Problem was getting access to the data i.e. being able to scan everybody's public feed continuously to pick up starred tweets. No way to do this with Twitter's current API. Ergo, brick wall on the development front.

If anyone can help, please get in touch: kyle@scunnered.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was trying to do something like this a couple of weeks ago - filtering and aggregating tweets on the basis of how many people &#8217;star&#8217; them. So if 200 people star the same tweet, it&#8217;s likely to appear in the current &#8216;most popular&#8217; list. Lists refreshed continually to ensure freshness, all-time top charts, archive, categorization etc etc. What you have then is a quality filter to cut through the noise.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also a level playing field in the sense that a star from Mike Arrington carries no more weight than a star from, well, me or anybody else. But there is weighting of sorts, of course, because those people with the most followers are more likely to attract stars from their followers. Probably have to filter out the obvious system-gamers.</p>
<p>Problem was getting access to the data i.e. being able to scan everybody&#8217;s public feed continuously to pick up starred tweets. No way to do this with Twitter&#8217;s current API. Ergo, brick wall on the development front.</p>
<p>If anyone can help, please get in touch: <a href="mailto:kyle@scunnered.com">kyle@scunnered.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.095 seconds -->
